Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
We have already viewed a circuit as a box containing an input u in (s) and an output
uout(s). The transfer function H(s) describes the operation which the circuit performs on the
input to obtain the output. The signal processing function performed by the circuit is then
represented as in Fig. 1. In this diagram, the lines represent signals while the boxes represent the
transfer function of a circuit or other funtional block. The details of the inner workings of the
circuit are ignored in this figure, and only the input/output relation is shown.
When dealing with a system containing many elements, it is a good idea to break the
circuit down into its basic functional blocks. The transfer functions of each block are described,
and the details of the inner workings of the blocks are ignored. Input and output impedances and
other properties of the blocks are also not represented. This results in a high-level, simpler
functional description of the system, which can be more easily understood. Once this is done, it
then remains to figure out what happens when the blocks are connected together as in the actual
circuit. Doing so is the object of these notes.
Cascaded blocks
u 1 (s ) u2 (s ) u3 (s )
H 1 (s ) H 2(s )
1
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
So the cascaded blocks can be reduced to a single block with transfer function H 2 (s) H1(s), as
diagrammed in Fig. 3.
u 1 (s ) u3 (s )
H 1 (s ) H 2(s )
Fig. 3. Reduced block diagram which represents the cascade connection of blocks H1(s) and H2(s).
Some care must be taken when cascading blocks, to ensure that the transfer functions of
the two blocks do not change when the blocks are connected together. If the transfer functions
do change, then they must be modified to properly account for the change.
+
R1 V1 (s) V2 (s)
v1 (t) + v2 (t) H 1 (s )
– C1
–
H1 (s) = 1
1 + sR1 C1
Fig. 4. Simple R-C low-pass filter example.
Fig. 5. Block diagram representation of the R-C low-
pass filter.
+ +
v1 (t) + R1 R2
– C1 v2 (t) C2 v3 (t)
– –
Now let us cascade a second R-C section as in Fig. 6, to obtain a two-pole low pass filter.
We would like to represent this circuit using the block diagram of Fig. 7.
2
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
V1 (s ) V2 (s ) V3 (s )
H 1 (s ) H 2(s )
The transfer function H2 (s) can be easily found. Given V 2 in Fig. 6, we can solve for V3 to find
V (s) 1
H 2(s) = 3 = (6)
V2(s) 1 + sR2C2
But H 1 (s) is no longer given by Eq. (5). The addition of the second R-C section loads down the
first section, and causes the transfer function H1(s) to change. Now, the impedance (R 2 + 1/sC2 )
appears effectively in parallel with capacitor C1 . The voltage divider relation for the first R-C
section becomes
1 || R2 + 1
sC 1 sC2
V2(s) = V1(s) (7)
R1 + 1 || R2 + 1
sC1 sC2
So the transfer function H1 (s) becomes
1 || R2 + 1
V2(s) sC 1 sC2
H 1(s) = = (8)
V1(s) R1 + 1 || R2 + 1
sC1 sC2
The cascade connection makes H1 (s) much more complicated.
It is usually a good idea to design your circuits so that the blocks do not interact, and so
that loading effects such as the one illustrated above are not significant. The resulting circuits
are much easier to understand, and there is greater likelihood that the analysis will be free of
algebra errors and that the final design will work as intended. Other people can also more easily
understand how your design works, which is a good idea in a team environment.
It is possible to choose the element values in the circuit above so that Eq. (8) and Eq. (5)
are essentially equal. By multiplying out Eq. (8) to express it in factored pole-zero form, one
obtains
1 + sR2C2
H 1(s) = (9)
1 + s R 1 C 1 + R2 C 2 + R1 C 2 + s 2 R 1 C 1 R 2 C 2
If R2 >> R 1 or C2 << C 1 , then the sR1 C2 term in the denominator is small compared to
s(R1 C1 + R2 C2 ). One can therefore neglect this term, and write H 1 (s) as
1 + sR2C2
H 1(s) ≈ (10)
1 + s R 1 C 1 + R2 C 2 + s 2 R 1 C 1 R 2 C 2
The denominator can now be factored as follows:
1 + sR2C2 1
H 1(s) ≈ = (11)
1 + sR1C1 1 + sR2C2 1 + sR1C1
3
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
which is the original H1(s) in Eq. (5). So if R2 >> R1 or C2 << C1 , then the loading effect of the
second R-C section on the first section is negligible.
In general, if the Thevenin-equivalent output impedance of the H 1 network is small in
magnitude compared to the impedance at the input of the H2 block, then connecting the blocks
together has little effect on the transfer function H 1 (s).
V3 (s )
V1 (s )
V1 (s ) V4 (s )
+–
+
V1 (s )
V1 (s )
V2 (s )
Fig. 7. Block diagram of a summing node. Fig. 8. Block diagram of a pick-off point.
V1 (s ) V2 (s ) V3 (s ) V4 (s )
H 1 (s ) + H 2 (s )
–
4
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
Original Equivalent
V1 (s ) V2 (s ) V1 (s ) V2 (s )
H 1 (s ) H 2(s ) H 1 (s ) H 2(s )
V1 (s ) V3 (s ) V1 (s ) V3 (s )
H 1 (s ) +
–
+
– H 1 (s )
V2 (s ) 1 V2 (s )
H1 (s)
V1 (s ) V3 (s ) V1 (s ) V3 (s )
+
– H 1 (s ) H 1 (s ) +
–
V2 (s ) V2 (s )
H 1 (s )
V1 (s ) V2 (s ) V1 (s ) V2 (s )
H 1 (s ) H 1 (s )
1 V3 (s )
V3 (s ) H1 (s)
V1 (s ) V2 (s ) V1 (s ) V2 (s )
H 1 (s ) H 1 (s )
V3 (s )
V3 (s ) H 1 (s )
V1 (s ) V2 (s ) V3 (s )
+
– G(s) V1 (s) G(s) V3 (s )
1 + G(s) H(s)
H(s)
block, to push a pick-off point through a block, and to reduce a feedback connection to a single
block.
The last rule, for reducing the feedback connection to a single block, requires some
analysis. We can write
5
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
G(s)
V3(s) = V1(s) (17)
1 + G(s) H(s)
which yields the equivalent block shown in the table.
Some examples
V2 (s )
V1 (s ) +
–
G1 (s) +
– G2 (s)
H2 (s)
H1 (s)
V2 (s )
V1 (s ) G2 (s)
+
–
G1 (s)
1 + G2 (s) H2 (s)
H1 (s)
6
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
G1 (s) G2 (s) V2 (s )
V1 (s ) +
– 1 + G2 (s) H2 (s)
H1 (s)
G1 G2 V2 (s )
V1 (s ) 1 + G2 H2
1 + G1 G2 H1
1 + G2 H2
Z 3 (s )
V1
Z1 V3
Z 1 (s ) Z3
–
Z 2 (s )
V2 + +
V1 (s ) +
– V2 (s ) +
–
Z2 V3 (s )
–
Consider next the op-amp circuit given in Fig. 15. For this circuit, we can write
– V3 = V1 + V2 (19)
Z3 Z1 Z2
and hence the output V3 is given by,
V3 = – Z3 V1 + V2 (20)
Z1 Z2
7
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
V1 (s ) 1 V3 (s )
+
+
– Z3
Z1
V2 (s ) 1
Z2
R3
R1
R5
R4 C1
C2
– R5
–
+ R2 –
V1 (s ) + +
– + V4 (s )
V2 (s ) V3 (s )
A block diagram of this circuit can be developed using a method similar to the previous
example. The equations of each op amp circuit are:
R1 V1 + V4
V2 = – (21)
1 + s R 1 C1 R 4 R 3
V3 = – 1 V2 (22)
s C2 R 2
V4 = – V3 (23)
8
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
1
R3
V1 (s ) 1 R1 1
++ – – –1
R4 1 + s R1 C1 s R2 C2 V4 (s )
V2 (s ) V3 (s )
1
R3
V1 (s ) 1 R1 1
+- – –
R4 1 + s R1 C1 s R2 C2
V3 (s )
Fig. 19. The block diagram of Fig. 18, with V 3 treated as the output.
1
R3
V1 (s ) 1 R1
+-
R4 s R2 C2 1 + s R1 C1 V3 (s )
Reduction of the feedback connection, and simplification of the transfer function of the resulting
block into standard normalized form, yields Fig. 21.
V1 (s ) 1 R3
R4 1 + s C2 R2 R3 / R1 + s2 C1 C2 R2 R3 V3 (s )
9
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
V3 = R3 1 (24)
V1 R 4 1 + s C 2 R 2 R 3 / R1 + s 2 C 1 C 2 R 2 R 3
Therefore, the transfer function contains two poles. Writing this transfer function in the standard
form
V3 = H 1
0 (25)
V1 1+ s + s 2
Q ω0 ω0
and equating coefficients of s yields the following analytical expressions for the transfer function
salient features:
R
dc gain H0 = 3 (26)
R4
C1
Q-factor Q = R1 (28)
C 2 R2 R3
It can be seen that these quantities can be chosen arbitrarily. For example, the dc gain is given
by R3 /R4. R2 , R3 , C1 , and C2 determine the corner frequency ω0. The Q is set by R1 .
A version of the biquad filter which contains both quadratic poles and quadratic zeroes is
given in Fig. 22. By proper choice of the element values, it is possible to design this circuit to
obtain any desired values of pole and zero corner frequencies and Q-factors.
10
ECEN2260 Supplementary notes on block diagrams
R3
R1
R5
R4 C1
C2
– R5
–
+ R2 –
V1 (s ) + +
– +
– output
+
Fig. 22. Biquad filter circuit whose transfer function contains quadratic zeroes and quadratic poles.
An invalid manipulation
A common mistake made by students is to push a pickoff point through a summing node.
The two block diagrams illustrated in Fig. 23 are not equivalent!
V3 (s ) V1 (s )
V1 (s ) V3 (s ) V1 (s ) V3 (s )
+ +
– –
V2 (s ) V2 (s )
Fig. 23. It is not valid to push a pickoff point through a summing node! The block diagrams
illustrated above are not equivalent.
This suggests that, when attempting to simplify block diagrams, one should usually attempt to
push pickoff points away from summing nodes.
11