Black Book III

January 1 2009
Irrefutable evidence of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy revealed for take down
www.uRus.ca
BLACK BOOK III

The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP Connection
Continued from
BLACK BOOK II (2)

The RCMP Connection Part 2
RCMP Correspondence and evidence November 8 2007 up to September 3 2008
Continued from
BLACK BOOK II (1)

RCMP Correspondence and evidence January 3 2006 up to November 8 2007
The RCMP Connection Part 1
Continued from
The original BLACK BOOK September 1 2006 now renamed BLACK BOOK I
Evidence provided to the Ontario Premier, my MPP, my MP, others and the RCMP
I had filed November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for
refusing to investigate Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and on September
10 2008 I received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed by RCMP
Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area that has irrefutably proven the
upper echelon of the RCMP are major players in the Government Organized Crime.
Amongst the evidence provided to the RCMP is the original BLACK BOOK dated September 1
2006, BLACK BOOK II (1) “The RMP Connection Part 1” a compilation of the evidence
provided to the RCMP from January 3 2006 – November 8 2007 and the BLACK BOOK II (2)
“The RCMP Connection Part 2” a compilation of the evidence provided to the RCMP from November 8
2007 to September 3 2008 the signing of the document that will go down in history as the
New Year Resolution?

1
A new life guaranteed requires you only to Believe and Support it
The government conspirators have provided us the truth
“uRus Charter Democracy Force ROP”

www.uRus.ca
Presents
This is copyright © material … See www.URus.ca for restrictions … For Personal Use Only
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Before I address the preceding report by the Chair, Paul E. Kennedy of the Commission for Public
Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police I would like to point out a few fundamentals
of extreme benefit to every individual in Canada.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.
If a group of people, an organization or multinationals…whatever, consistently operate inconsistent

with the supreme law of Canada that guarantees every individual Charter rights of equal protection and
benefit before and under the law it would prudent to report the alleged offender to the authorities
providing all the evidence one had available to support the allegations and when the evidence is
reasonable on its own it is the responsibility of the Constitution: Establishment to have a competent
responsible irreproachable system in place to deal with such issues staffed with competent responsible
irreproachable personnel able to act in continuity department to department, agency to agency.
department to agency…whatever in a seamless fashion to achieve the ultimate goal of protecting the
Canadian people from individuals, groups, organizations or multinationals or gangs because there is no
doubt one individual can not stand to a gang intent on injuring or depriving them of that which belongs
to them, being an obvious infringement of an individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
It does not matter to the individual how the authorities choose to write words to paper such as section
so and so of Act so and so that is the Establishments specialty assigned to deal with whatever the
situation may be, document in any which way they like in efficient and effective manner but priority is
11
to get the job done consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed
democratic and Charter rights which the people finance the entire legal system, government and the
whole shebang trusting the authorities are competent responsible irreproachable in continuity with
fortitude and conviction to providing the necessities of society efficiently and cost effectively as
possible or else they are being deprived of everything they pay for including their safety and wellbeing
as guaranteed by the Charter.
The life of an individual is obviously their priority one prized possession where it is simply impossible
to put a value on a person’s life for without it the person obviously has nothing whether they have a
billion bucks in possession or a penny in his or her shoes.
There is no doubt there is a catalogue available in the hit world and there are people who for a thousand
bucks or less would kill a person rich or poor but do we value a person’s life by finding one of these
people and asking the price?
I think not because these people do not exist in “The Spirit of the Law” having no guaranteed rights to
exist a life inconsistent with the Constitution adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
and there simply is no way in hell the Constitution can be interpreted to protect them from “The Spirit
of the Law” that if the Establishment was efficient and effective Canada would be blanketed with an
aura of “The Spirit of the Law” acquiesced over the years with it now being how many years since the
Federation of the democracy of Canada in 1867. One hundred and forty two years approximately and
democracy has not yet been demonstrated in Canada, whereas a person whose life span is far less and
born in 1867 has long died never seeing the democracy where if the person was wealthy existing in the
Upper Tier it would be of no concern to especially having all the advantages that accompany it and of
course once the persons dead their concerns are over.
There can be know doubt that all humans have the same requirements to sustain life and money is the
common denominator of trade for the necessities of life and of course the more one has the more likely
they will exist the quality of life of their choosing where it is rare one would choose a life of apparent
poverty and no matter how much money one has it is very difficult to resist an easy opportunity to gain
more.
Well I may get back to this line of thought but you can go ahead and follow it wherever it leads you but
I thought given the seriousness of the issues that I have been presenting to the government for several
years now as Mr. Kennedy stated…3 years as a matter of fact on January 3 2009 that I have been
communicating with the RCMP and first began e-mailing evidence and commentary, January 18 2006
often lengthy using the RCMP - Michael Thomson e-mail address, which he supplied me in his report
of the same day.
His report was on matters of the Canadian Corporations Business Act which I had requested the RCMP
on January 3 2006 to address providing the evidence to Inspector Peter Goulet at the RCMP
Newmarket headquarters.
It is important to understand that I did not o to the RCMP headquarters looking for Inspector Peter
Goulet who I had never met before and I was not communicating with Sgt. Michael Thomson on a
personal level nor a desired level as I was just presenting irrefutable evidence at the time of criminal
offenses of fraud by my former tenant Don Wilson witnessed and recorded by the ORHT judicator
Nancy Fahlgren in a public building being part of the Ontario legal system financed by the people to
12
administer and enforce the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 consistent with the Constitution conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit.
The evidence that was provided to the RCMP on January 3 2006 included the evidence I accumulated
to the date since the offenses were committed on June 30 2005 and the RCMP have been kept up to
date with all the evidence I have accumulated to date that irrefutably proves government organized
crime, corruption and conspiracy.
The Chair of the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP dares to demean me as if to
say that I believe the world populace is insane except for me and from my perspective it appears so and
reality attests, but just as Canada is under the legal authority of the Constitution where everyone is
presumed innocent in harmony with “The Spirit of the Law” any person of sane moral thought and
reason know that to be the desired situation, the Ideal that is simply a matter of sanely dealing with
reality where it is every individual’s responsibility to exist in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law”
It is the same reasoning that the legal system is financed obviously with the intent of staffing it with
competent responsible irreproachable personnel in continuity from top to bottom, top to sideways,
sideways to bottom all financed for precisely the same purpose to provide the necessities of society
much similar to garbage persons, although humongously different whereas similarly the administers
and enforcers job is to pick up the garbage and recycle it but as garbage can only increase as the
population grows if the legal system was efficient and cost effective the garb age they deal with should
steadily decrease f they had a legitimate system in place forever attentive to punishment with
exemplary fortitude and conviction to deterrence and recycling where nipping amoral inclination in the
bud is priority one and deterence the only viable means of protecting every individual prior to
becoming victim.
Agreed I have reiterated upon reiteration and have extended into lengthy writings that I have provided
to government personnel since August 10 2005 and published on my web sites informing them all
where the evidence can be found should they misplace their copies because it happens you know, as I
experienced with the Toronto Mayor’s Office cover up of the gallagher papers as they seem to have
vanished when I decided to publish the evidence on the web where it would be readily available to
them and anyone else and save a whole lot of time waiting for a resolve that was never in their cards.
Before we continue it would be prudent if the people administering and enforcing the law had an
excellent understanding of the law, which obviously has nothing to do with the RCMP Act or any of
the others the government personnel have been citing that probably accounts for me persistently stating
that every government person who disagrees with me, which is them all must be in on the conspiracy
and I have often mentioned that it is quite possibly just due to ignorance and incompetence that I have
come to know in my forty year career in land surveying, the first 10 with the province and the last 14
with the City of Toronto and 16 years in the private sector dealing with government from both sides of
the counter.
It is irrelevant whether you or any of the other government personnel are just naturally ignorant,
incompetent and irresponsible or deliberately so being in on the conspiracy for the result is the same
and every individual is not being protected equally as guaranteed by the Charter and do not write for
any other purpose than to provide you and the rest the truth for you to read for ever long it takes you to
become coherent to the law because you are simply not allowed to pretend you are administering and
enforcing the law to pick up a pay check, benefits, and decent pension to ransack us.
13
If you are of sane moral thought and reason I would have thought that it would have been picked up on
more than three years ago and saved me three valuable years that seem to become more rare as you get
older.
Just for the record we all know you people cannot possibly be as dumb as you would have us believe
and certainly I was not writing all this over the years expecting any of you to all of sudden snap into
sane moral thought and reason because you know all about that stuff.
You just do not care to use it for sane moral thought and reason, being something you hide b ehind as
you carry out the traditional unscrupulous ways of your mentors.
No, that is not the purpose of proliferating you unscrupulous people with the truth.
It was done for many reasons other than the inane for there are people out there who happen to be
coherent to reality existing at the other end of your ignorant unscrupulous ways, who are only ignorant
in matters of law because they have other fields of endeavor chosen for their careers where they know
well the detriments of a career not attended to where competent responsible people strive to maintain
equilibrium above the poverty line in the reality the government has provided us so distanced from the
Ideal obviously due the fact the government modus operandi well documented is headed in the opposite
direction 180 degrees adverse to the Constitution and every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
I do not know how many times I wrote of you charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and
orchestration of the entire legal system against the people but then you guys go ahead and clearly
demonstrate it in everything you do and write and I thank you for you’re the fine evidence you
provided dated December 23 2008 that goes nicely with the one from RCMP Superintendent Robert
Davis wrapping up the case for the people.
So there can be no deny by any of you people that you have been in possession of the evidence and
there can be no denying as to your attitude and opinion of it that is consistent with the conspiracy and
you had no other choice in an attempt to keep the conspiracy going using the same old modus operandi
that we are all familiar with.
For the benefit of the people who have careers in other fields of endeavor, the moral majority I have
made the effort to provide them a quick study of the law….that should take ten minutes or so to get into
“The Spirit of the Law” so they can have a look at the deliberate incompetence of the legal system and
the spirit in which you abuse the trust and compromise the safety and wellbeing of the people who trust
and finance you.
This is going to be hard for you people to believe but you are supposed to be on our side especially
selected from the population provided with the honor to protect us all equally which is such a simple
concept most receptive where any laws that you follow that do not meet the ends then those are the
damn laws that are inconsistent with the Constitution for Christ sake.
I wonder if it is possible to assemble a team that can consistently score on the opponents net as well as
you consistently score on ours.
14
January 1 2009
by Reverse Osmosis Psychosis
We will eradicate Government Organized Crime, corruption, inhumanities, poverty, and starvation
Governments are corrupt beyond belief
Believe it and poof ...they are gone
The unscrupulous federal government wrote the law

precisely sane of moral thought and reason
for us to trust and believe to ransack the people of the

Lower Tier who have been seasoned
Their Modus Operandi is that of Organized Crime as

reality attests
15
Know "The Spirit of the Law" then Believe in it and we will
do the rest
URUS Charter Democracy Force ROP
www.urus.ca
January 1 2009
If you believe that you already know the law having observed the politicians
and legal system in action quite competent of the reality that is "How it is"
with persistent poverty, starvation, inhumanities, hopelessness and despair
that begets crime in flourishing numbers that our tax dollars cannot keep the
pace, so distanced from the Ideal defined and guaranteed in the Canadian
Charter of rights....perhaps you are part of the problem and do not Know The
Law.
Perhaps you are an excellent witness as to how the shysters operate adverse
to the law and the only way to determine that is to take 10 minutes to
compare what you have come to know to see if your observed knowledge is
consistent with the Constitution, the supreme law of Canada that recognizes
the supremacy of God and the rule of law where all laws must be consistent
with "The Spirit of the Law"
Know "The Spirit of the Law" in ten minutes and recognize the Devil's Disciples for
the rest of your life
16
Excerpts from the Constitution Act, 1982: Document
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
"Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of Law"
The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of Conduct
103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the
rules in the spirit as well as in the letter.
Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle
Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability,

dominance
Charter: contract, licence, deed, agreement, bond, hire, rent, employ
Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism: parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality
Spirit: strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, Force, fortitude
Justice: fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even- handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity
Consistency: constancy, steadiness, reliability, uniformity, evenness, stability, regularity
Osmosis: the gradual, often unconscious, absorption of knowledge or

ideas through continual exposure rather than deliberate learning
17
The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law
The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law.
Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority
is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in
accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.
The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.

According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly
include a clear separation of powers,
legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.
The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has
become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"
publicly disclosed laws
"The Letter of the Law" in the first statement of Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
clearly cedes to the supremacy of God and Jesus of world renown summarized the aspirations
attributed to God as "The Golden Rule" obviously "The Spirit of the Law".
Where there is conflict between "The Spirit of the Law" and "The Letter of the Law" "The Spirit of
the Law" has superiority clearly stated in "The Letter of the Law", where sane moral thought and
reason is either stated or implied giving credence to that which is least apt to be mistaken by
humankind whereas to be human is to err, there can be no mistaking the meaning and intention of The
Golden Rule as words put to paper by people can be unintentionally ambiguous, adverse to "The Spirit
of the Law" inconsistent with the Constitution, either erroneously or deliberately placed for nefarious
intent or deliberately interpreted inconsistent with the Constitution, but of no force or effect
18
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical
disability.
Consistency
Consistency in "The Spirit of the Law"= The Golden Rule is obviously mandatory to meet the terms
of the Charter, in particular s. 15.(1) and s.52.(1)
To meet the terms of the "Letter of the Law" consistency is mandatory where "The Letter of the Law"
clearly recognizes the supremacy of God . "The Spirit of the Law" has priority over "The Letter of
the Law" and where there is perceived to be conflict "The Spirit of the Law" must prevail throughout
to maintain legal certainty of justice and equal protection and benefits of the law the legal system
personnel , namely the members of the Law Societies, government and private sector must be
competent, responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to the support of
every individual's guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. Clearly The Golden Rule
is "The Spirit of the Law" consistent with democracy, justice, principles, and the rule of law and
a sane person of moral legitimate thought and reason could not possibly find the Golden Rule any fairer
or simpler to comprehend where credence must be to that, which is least apt to be mistaken by
humankind where all persons in matters of law are presumed human and sane who should have no
misunderstanding as to what is receptive and non receptive to each other.
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
and democratic society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b)
freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of
communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived
thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based
on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or
denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers
appropriate and just in the circumstances.
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.
19
32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all
matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and
Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all
matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
It is irrelevant whether or not God exists or whether or not one believes he exists as obviously it does
not matter what one believes as long as they are CONSISTENTLY in, of and with "The Spirit of the
Law"
A person's safety and wellbeing is the most valuable possession every individual has and must be
treated with the respect they are entitled to as equals guaranteed by law. It is every individual's
responsibility to abide by the law that ultimately protects every individual and it is the responsibility of
the federal and provincial governments who signed the Constitution to consistently demonstrate due
diligence to every individual's guaranteed Charter rights ensuring every individual abides by the law.
We are all human requiring the same necessities of life and would have to be insane not to know what
is receptive and non-receptive of others
Sanity must CONSISTENTLY prevail in "The Spirit of the Law"
Confucius 551 BC - 479 BC born to poverty rose to dine with kings experiencing all walks of life gave
us the Golden Rule "Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself" and
"Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness" Jesus confirmed the
Golden Rule in paraphrase as the summary of the aspirations attributed to God
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"
The purpose of Law and Order is to define the law and enforce it. In the case of the Constitution
priority one is to every individual's guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits
It cannot be over emphasized that competent responsible irreproachable people of sane moral thought
and reason in continuity with fortitude and conviction to every individual's guaranteed Charter rights is
mandatory of the administers and enforcers of the laws to be consistent with the Constitution.
Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc Declaration of principles
1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following
principles:
20
1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve.
4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.
The law is particularly clear CONSISTENT with sane moral thought and reason and due punishment
applies to every individual who strays from the law and in positions of trust where tremendous amounts
of money are involved with extraordinary temptation and opportunity extreme measures must be taken
to eradicate the temptation and opportunity by extreme punishment particularly attentive to deterrence,
the only viable means of present knowledge to apply due diligence to the protection of every individual
as guaranteed..
In order to maintain equality of protection and benefits consistent with the Constitution justice must be
the personification of "The Spirit of the Law" free to victims on the presentation of reasonable evidence
that they have been victimized as defined in the provisions of the Charter in s.24 (1) are guaranteed the
right to apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to be recompensed by the perpetrator in due course
unobstructed.
It is extortion to charge victims for their guaranteed Charter rights that only exasperates the already
humongous burden on the taxpayers who are made to finance the entire legal system to deal with the
amorally inclined. It is the amoral who should be made to finance the operating costs of the system
with the taxpayer having already been deprived to pay for the infrastructure and to get the system up
and running. It must be done in efficient and effective manner for the sole purpose to determine one's
innocence or guilt, and when proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt made to recompense his or her
victim to the status he or she was in prior to the act that brought the perpetrator before the courts. The
convicted must also recompense the taxpayer for all court costs. The taxpayer is deprived every court
case and every time a perpetrator is allowed to go free when a victim is deprived of his or her right to
bring the perpetrator to justice.and I reiterate they who deprive them of the right do so illegally without
the authority of the Constitution and without the financial backing of the taxpayer.
When a victim is obstructed in any way from the justice entitled to him or her under the Constitution
his or her guaranteed Charter rights have been severely compromised and in fact denied and may apply
to the courts for recompense consistent with sane moral thought and reason, consistent with s.24(1) of
the Charter. Not only are the victims rights severely compromised, but every individual’s rights are
also with their safety and wellbeing at stake as the amoral inclined are allowed to pursue their immoral
inclinations unencumbered flourishing like weeds as do the legal profession, administers and enforcers,
one and the same as they nourish and water the weeds protecting them from the justice of the people as
mothers whose children are never guilty, nor are they of protecting their kids rearing them to be
criminals.
21
Weed Syndrome
The government members of the Law Societies...legal profession, DOJ-federal and the office of the
Attorney General -provincial, politicians, their affluent and influential friends have manufactured the
"Weed Syndrome" completely 180 degrees adverse to the Constitution, without a trace the Constitution
exists in their modus operandi which reality attests, as the rich continue to get richer and the poor
continue to get poorer as Stats Canada attests.
The reason is obvious ...the government members of the legal profession and politicians are
Government Organized Crime personified creating the problems of society to address them for
luxurious profit. enticed by their affluent and influential friends of the corporate world who have their
hands into everything, manipulating the stock markets, orchestrating the entire legal system against the
people while protecting them from the people, creating Ombudsman's, Commissions, Task Forces,
Human Rights Tribunals, ....The Law Society of Upper Canada is a particularly good example as to
the obvious intention of these unscrupulous people of nefarious bent. as they have the nerve to blatantly
admit, either stated or implied that their members are not required to give a damn about every
individual's guaranteed Charter rights and they go on to clearly admit that evidence is irrelevant to
them when it is against their members and demonstrated that in the manner they dealt with my
complaint against one of their members. See (the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document)
CanLaw an international lawyer referral service states on the first page of their web site
www.canlaw.ca that the Law Society can not be trusted as they protect their members from the
consumer, not the consumer from their members
The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites irrefutably proves the entire
system is designed to protect the members of the Law Society, politicians and their affluent and
influential friends.
The system is designed to ransack society in every which way, the insurance companies the legal
professionals ravage that the consumer pays the tab, the long drawn out court cases due the fact the
laws are a tangled web of deceit, that most elusive concept –the rule of law- but hard to easily define
by design, not consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual's Charter rights infested
with ambiguity, loopholes and inconsistencies with the Constitution that they do not give a damn
about, and the taxpayer pays the tab
The members of the legal profession have infested the corporate world, all adhering to the illegitimate
laws which they all hold as legitimate, where the more affluent and influentially backed wins the case
rather than justice and society. They help themselves to taxes as to whatever they feel the people can
afford, and still survive to a healthy existence to do the work that makes the people of the Upper Tier
healthy and wise, while the people of the Lower Tier hardly have a chance to catch their breathe. They
allow the banks and credit card companies to gouge the people, just another way to make the people of
the Upper Tier rich, and the Lower Tier poorer and poorer.
Trickle up effect
22
For the economy to grow the people need money to spend. Though never tried before if the
government and friends stopped stealing the people's money they would give it to them by
spending where it more than likely to more than trickles up to them.
The "Weed Syndrome" continues to grow and difficult to bring any one of them to justice because
they all live in glass houses and one stone could richochet shattering them all to the ground.
All the people with the authority or influence to deal with the issues, including the media, charities,
Democracy Watch and others akin, Church, United Nations, Transparency International,...you name
them....a few of them documented by the Charter Democracy Force and published on their web site
www.charterdemocracyforce.org are all involved one way or another. The Church thrives by
befuddling the peoples minds with myths and fiction setting them up for the Fiction of the Attorney
General as defined by University of British Columbia University history professor in his book making
reference to the compelling book by Edmund Morgan "Inventing the people: The Popular rise of
Sovereignty in England and America" that asserts the success of any form of government is dependent
on deceiving the people and in a democracy it is necssary for the people to believe they have a voice
or...the representatives are the people.
Corruption is not just inherent to the system...it is embedded into the system particularly designed to
ransack society, creating poverty, starvation, inhumanities, hopelessness and despair that instigates
crime with wars inevitable of apposing political parties who incite their people to civil unrest and wars
as they are all in a frenzy over the money that is readily available to them from the people who
unfortunately finance and trust they act on their behalf. The ramifications of the "Weed Syndrome"
upon the world is unfathomable, worse than one can imagine of the unscrupulous running wild
having done over and over again, and much worse with the worst yet to come.
Amidst the prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence published on this site and the Charter Democracy
Force web sites is also a prodigious amount of commentary in simple layman's terms with the intent to
wake the people from their spell so they can see reality and the nefarious bent for what they really are,
smiles and hand shakes that you had best remember to check your rings and watches are still there after
the encounter.
Up until June 30 2005 I was as naive about the deliberately, entirely corrupt government organized
conspiracy as the next guy and if wasn't for the fact of so many coincidences being precisely
compatible to my life’s experience I would not have the irrefutable proof to provide to the people and
the relatively simple matter to eradicate the "Weed Syndrome" before the world is smothered with the
weeds with nowhere for flowers and food crops to grow
Please have a thorough understanding of "The Spirit of the Law" before attempting
to read on
23
I believe that it would be fair to say that it would be insane not to be sane if we could
Bald and Two Faced Liars
The Fiction of the Attorney General
The Brainwashing of the People
First their minds then their bodies work for them
University of British Columbia history professor Jonathan Swainger writes of Edmund Morgan's
compelling book "Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America"
Opens with an assertion that the success of any form of government requires the acceptance of a
number of fictions
In democracies, for example, it is necessary for the population to "believe that the people have a
voice...or that the representatives of the people are the people"
The cure: Do not Believe the nefarious bent
24
Inventing the people: is just a metaphor for brain washing
Far from the popular belief of the governments and friends the people need to be
successful for the economy to thrive
Ambition is easier enticed when their is something in it for all the people
Parity comes to mind and democracy and Charter rights and the rule of law and the
Golden Rule
Did Parliament write the R & R of the Attorney General?
Downloaded from the Ontario web site
Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General
The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.
One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is
responsible for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while
simultaneously representing the interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the
Government to the Ministry and the Ministry's communities of interest.
As “guardian of the public interest” the Attorney General has a definite responsibility to ensure every
individual is equally protected and benefitted whereas the interests of Cabinet must cede priority to
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and the Attorney General is responsible to make certain
they do in the same manner he must make certain every Canadian individual accepts their
responsibility with due punishment due the crime with strict adherence to deterrence being the only
viable option of present knowledge with due regard to one’s ability to pay.
25
Whereas a $5000 fine could be pocket change to one and 3 years savings…whatever to another
providing humongous advantage to the affluent and influential contrary to section 15.(1)
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based
on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority
32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters
within the authority of the legislature of each province.
The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming
from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-
like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".
Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney
General.
There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique
responsibilities to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government.
While there are different emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout
all the various aspects of the Attorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and
traditional responsibility beyond that of a political minister.
,I reiterate that every individual has priority one responsibility to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights and the Attorney General as “guardian of the public interest” has a definite priority to
ensure all government departments, agencies, courts, Ombudsman, police, members of the Law Society
of Upper Canada, ….whoever that he influences or advises are responsible and consistent with the
Constitution, with due diligence to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, whereas their laws
must be clear with no ambiguity, loopholes and inconsistencies left for individual’s to debate in court
putting unnecessary burden on the public only benefitting the unscrupulous members of the Law
Society who do not give a damn about every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and the office of
the Ontario General condones it, as I have provided the irrefutable evidence to both the office of the
Ontario Attorney General and the DOJ-Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
They illegally pass the burden to the individual who does not have the wherewithal to do it and why
should they having other fields of endeavour who know well of the consequences of not being attentive
to their jobs.
26
The government members of the Law Society have been and are financed by the people to administer
and enforce the Constitution consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s equal
rights of protection and benefits who have been formally educated, with the insider knowledge that
comes with experience with the entire system, buildings, maintenance ,furnishings, equipment all
financed by the people, specifically provided with the wherewithal to act on behalf of the people and
society as a whole and what do they do?
They take over our whole damn system and structure it for their flourishing luxurious benefit refusing
to protect the people as guaranteed because they need victims, clientele to provide for their luxurious
lifestyle attentive to benefiting themselves to the humongous detriment to the individual and society as
a whole who they simply do not give a damn about or the Constitution as their modus operandi clearly
demonstrates absolutely 180 degrees adverse to every individual’s Charter rights.
The evidence has been provided to both the Premier of Ontario and the Prime Minister of Canada who
also do not give a damn.
It has been provided to the Bar Associations across Canada, the Federal Association of Law Societies
who does not give a damn and the list goes on forever, published in the GLIST of e-mail addresses on
the URus Charter Democracy Force ROP web site www.URus.ca
These people are pathetic excuses for human beings taking every advantage of their trusted positions
working together against the people but invariably persistently in fight for power for the first whack at
how they are going to ransack us and divvy up the loot.
The evidence is irrefutable and is every where in reality clearly demonstrated for everyone to see that
their
system obstructs the middle class from accessing the court system because of the exorbitant costs for
even a 3 day civil action cited as $60,000 in the July 26 2008 Toronto Saturday Star as Ontario
Attorney General Chris Bentley and prominent judges cited the seriousness of the issues as they set th
public up for another hug cash grab to top up the Legal Aid system whre thy set money aside with easy
access to pilfer in their unscrupulous ways as thy would have us believe it is socity they car about as
the members of the Law Society are looking for hefty raises so they can continue to ransack the victims
who can afford and are willing to pay their extorted exorbitant fees
for access to the legal system that every victim is legally entitled to and guaranteed under s. 24 (1)
The ramifications of their entire illegitimate legal system is absolutely horrendous upon the Canadian
populace that is the cause of the persistent struggle of humankind, with many victims left in their wake
who they feast off, the cause of poverty, hopelessness and despair that begets criminal actions to
survive and escape the cellar they are put in, providing the members of the Law Societies clientele that
the taxpayer funds their legal counsel at exorbitant prices while the taxpayer of the middle class
cannot afford to access the courts which allows the perpetrator to go free to leave many victims in
their wake before they graduate to hardened criminals and victimize someone of the Upper Tier where
the money is that catches the interest of these nefarious bent who would have us believe they are
respectable members of society acting on the people’s behalf for their safety and wellbeing as
guaranteed by the Charter
27
The simple and obvious fact is if they were to structure an efficient and cost effective legal system the
Law Society would not flourish but in fact gradually work themselves out of jobs the same as the rest of
the government department personnel who merely design their systems to deal with the symptoms they
they leave the roots of the problems unattended.
This deprives and infringes on the Charter rights of every individual in innumerable ways as well one
can imagine and surpass.
The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney
General Act. Section 5 states:
The Attorney General,

(a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council;
(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;
(c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario;
(d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General of England by
law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall perform the duties and powers
that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General
in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the
powers of the Legislature;
(e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon all matters of law
referred to him or her by the Government;
(f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government measures of a
legislative nature;
(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with such ministries
and agency;
(h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of government in respect of
any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;
(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;
(j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant Governor in
Council. "
a clear separation of powers,??
What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and
responsibilities, primarily as outlined in the Act.
Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))
The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as the
independent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends
to the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the
position and well established in common law, statutes and tradition.
It is well established that they are Government Organized Crime personified and old laws,
traditions, statutes and new laws traditions and statutes must be consistent with the Constitution or
be of no force or effect as to their inconsistencies.
28
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to
easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary
measures and safeguards personal liberties.
The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is
maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.
In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's
policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's
legal advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy
advice has the same weight as that of other ministers.
Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))
One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for
criminal prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92
gives the provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and
thereby gives the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code.
The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney
General and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision
whether or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the
prosecution should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown
Attorney.
It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out
the Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political
pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be
undertaken - and seen to be undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political
considerations. Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy.
This responsibility has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's
Attorney - not as a Minister of the government of the day.
This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A
wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney
General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions
relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone and
independent of the traditional Cabinet decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of
cases, these decisions are made by the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys.
An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting
criminal prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which
includes not only the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a
distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.
29
The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept
of criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One
of the Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the
public in understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.
The rule of law- that they do not respect, that most elusive concept, -the rle of law- hard to easily
define that protects the people and society as a whole.
The legitimate- rule of law- as defined by the Wikipedia appears to be consistent with “The Spirit of
the Law”
The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site was
obviously authored and authorized prior to the Constitution with no reference to the Charter with
many inconsistencies with the Constitution but clearly demonstrates the unscrupulous nature of the
authors and authorizers, presumably Parliament, ideological abusers.
The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has
become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"
There is nothing difficult to understand about the Constitution, the Charter, “The Spirit of the Law”
“The Golden Rule” and the rule of law all being CONSISTENT with each other.
Why wouldn’t the people understand and obviously the authors and authorizers of the R & R were
aware that the people would not understand their unscrupulous illegitimate ways and felt it necessary
to make that entry?
The challenge is for the people to make the members of the Law Societies and Politicians understand
that they are required to be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and
conviction to structure a system consistent with the Constitution with exemplary diligence to every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits.
They claim-the rule of law- is a well established legal principle prior to 1982 and they are the people
with the authority to make the laws, so why have they not corrected them to be efficient consistent with
the Constitution as required by s. (52)?
The rule of law as the R & R defines it is not consistent with democracy let alone the Charter and the
evidence published on the URus Charter Democracy Force ROP clearly shows the legal system is in
shambles 180 degrees adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights irrefutably proving the
government members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are as unscrupulous today as they were
prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution with 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document
irrefutably proving it.
The office of the Attorney General administers the Law Society Act and is a bencher who appoints the
Chair, but is not subject to reprimand by through the mandate of the Law Society Act.
30
The office Ontario Attorney General and the office of the Minister of Justice are appointed positions
most probably puppets of the bureaucracy well embedded in the system who carry out the tradition of
the nefarious bent
You should now have a good understanding of the law aware that the “Roles and Responsibilities of
the Attorney General” are inconsistent with the Constitution and any inconsistencies are of no force or
effect
You should all be aware of the government’s unscrupulous nature but you have not seen anything yet
until you read the evidence of my personal trek in search for justice that began 3 ½ years ago regarding
events that occurred on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal.
This is well covered in the original BLACK BOOK now a preliminary section in BLACK BOOK II
that will be used to eradicate amoral inclination from our government personnel.
Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the
Legislature, for decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of
course, once the prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute.
The sub judicae rule bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the
matter. The sub judicae rule strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions
that are before the courts. Given the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment
coming from the office would be seen as an attempt to influence the case.
Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual
criminal cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political
interference. Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the
Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where
the public would expect the Attorney General to be briefed.
Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))
The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These
responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in
accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously
an important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise
on the constitutionality and legality of legislation.
The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of
Legislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring
the legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship
to the Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards,
individual pieces of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within the
sole control of Legislative Counsel or the Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative
31
Counsel also has a direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all private member's
bills.
The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to
review legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical
issues related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.
The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely,
Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to
disregard it. The Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area
of criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions
about the legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation.
Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))
In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its
agencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the
historical powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on
the Crown's parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only
to conduct litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases
where there is a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake.
This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is
well and independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter
challenges to legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene
constitutionally protected rights.
Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))
A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of

justice in the province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for
maintaining liaison with the judiciary.
Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts
administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles
of judicial independence must be exercised in this area.
Before moving on to study the evidence please be certain that you are competent to do so.
Know the Law

Now before we scrutinize the Chair, Mr Kennedy’s report lets us have a look at the cooperation and
admitted incompetence of Mr. Andree Leduc
32
33
December 27 2007
Commission for Public Complaints Against The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
7337 137 Street, Suite 102
34
Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4
Fax 604-501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca
Attention Andree Leduc

Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
Frank Gallagher
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316
Manager, CST RET.
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317 GCCRF
Dear Andree Leduc
In response to your letter of December 20 2007 (copy attached) I thank you for admitting your
incompetence and lack of authority to deal with the issues of Government corruption and conspiracy
which are of a pressing concern to me and in my opinion should be a pressing concern to you but
obviously you are oblivious to that reality, understandable however because I have a firm grasp of it.
You have stressed once again, that the purpose of the Commission is to provide the public with an
opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of the members of the RCMP in the
performance of their duties.
I understand you have neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit you to become involved
in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.
It is important to note that I am alert to the narrow minds of government personnel and your limited
respect for the individuals of the moral majority not in the employ of the government services and
your persistence to insult our intelligence.
Let me put emphasis on the fact that I thank you as a citizen of Canada being an individual of the
public, for the opportunity to make a complaint concerning the conduct of the members of the RCMP
in the performance of their duties and in fact, as you are aware I have taken advantage of your
generosity, however I must also emphasize I am a taxpayer and I suggest you keep that in mind
should you care to continue in your endeavors.
Your admittance, and though appreciative of your integrity, is discerning that you are incompetent but
admittance is the first step to the cure.
Integrity is an exceptionally wonderful trait rare in the employ of the government and we can not
afford to lose you.
If it would give you any satisfaction I am incompetent too having no experience in dealing with a
government conspiracy when I began back on June 30 2005 even though I was aware of persistent
government corruption and conspiracy as we all are I never had substantial evidence of it, but with
confidence in my integrity and ability to think things out I set out to prove it and now confident that I
have a voluminous, and I thank you for that word because I have been stuck with “ a preponderance”
and “ a prodigious” which I thanked Karen Noakes #440 of the York Regional Police” for, to describe
the amount of irrefutable evidence I have supplied to a voluminous number of government personnel
who have refused to deal with the issues published on my web site implicating them in the
35
conspiracy.
At this moment I will accept the fact you are incompetent which you have admitted and demonstrated
and will offer you some suggestions with the endeavor to keep you out of trouble and more useful to
the Canadian people.
I have filed a complaint against two members of the RCMP for failing to investigate government
conspiracy as you are aware and have acknowledged in your letter of November 8 2007 (copy
attached)
There is little needed to investigate the complaint for all that is required to do is ask the officers
involved and they will confirm it.
On my complaint I identified my mother as witnessing the refusal by Sergeant Roy Steinebach on

October 18 2007 so I doubt there will be any denying of that which I complained about. Too simple
so far right?
What the issue will be is whether or not the RCMP had the right to refuse to investigate the evidence
which they may if it is considered trivial, frivolous, or vexatious.
I believe the complaint itself is evident that it is not trivial, Right?
Is it frivolous or vexatious?
You don’t know right?
That is why I have been forwarding the evidence to you in advance so as to provide you the
opportunity to familiarize yourself with it and to get your mind thinking in appropriate manner due
the serious nature of the issues..
Your admittance of your incompetence and inexperience to that endeavor is discerning I reiterate but
never the less you will be called upon to make that very important decision.
At some point a public hearing will be in order and it would be prudent for the Chair to assign a
competent panel to the task and to that endeavor I heartedly suggest you study the evidence published
on my web site.
With due regard to your present ineptness I advise that attentiveness to the issues in the document
Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2 will suffice to determine whether or not the members of
the RCMP who I have complained about are negligent in performance of their duties.
I have presumed you people are not members of the legal profession and that is precisely what is
required of a jury in this instance not being biased, well perhaps that is not entirely correct, however
all that is required is a sane mind of integrity although one or the other is in question due your letter
to me but it will all become clear as we proceed.
You will find that Law Society document at the top of the page on my web site
36
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
I remind you there will be no authority provided by the government conspirators to any person, or
government department or agency to take them out and likewise there will be no cooperation from
anyone under the influence of the conspiracy and in fact when they become aware of this document
will attempt to interfere with you in performance of your duty and I suspect they will be very
convincing as they continue to obstruct justice. Perhaps you have already consulted with them.
I dare say they will be successful in their initiative but at that time if you were to take the news to the
media you will be assured a prominent spot in the hearts of the moral majority and you will play a
major role in the restructuring of the system consistent with and conducive to the support of the
Charter guarantee.
Adversely the consequences are unpredictable though will certainly be detrimental to some
significant degree of your concern.
Take a few moments if needed to reason that out and then keep it firmly and prominent in mind.
Given the serious nature of the issues and our inexperience at dealing with such issues it is of the
utmost importance to get the evidence into experienced hands and most importantly responsible
hands which is an improbability due the fact the entire legal system is corrupt and involved in the
conspiracy, which at the moment I am giving you the benefit of the doubt due to the lack of
irrefutable evidence.
To that endeavor I expect full cooperation immediately consistent with your mandate, which must be
consistent with the Constitution.
I must advise that all correspondence with you will be published on my web site and failure to
respond to me in a timely manner will alter your status implicating you in the conspiracy.
The ultimate goal is obviously a Public Inquiry and I do expect full cooperation to that initiative
where it is the only viable option relative to the circumstances.
The Law Society document requires no professional experience to assess as to whether or not it
makes sense for members of the Law Society of Upper Canada to administer and enforce the law
consistent with and conducive to the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 which
includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees every individual equality in
protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law.
I suggest you make particular note of that.
Throughout my documents published on the web I have copied excerpts from the Charter but for your
convenience I provide you this.
I should mention that I am 65 years old and do not intend to spend the rest of my life tending to a
simple matter of bringing down the government conspiracy and I expect you to respect my concerns.
I must say I was quite surprised, impressed and appreciative as to how quickly you processed my
37
original complaint to the RCMP.
Back to the matter on hand, the Law Society document, after reading you will be coherent to the fact
it is an improbability that members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are required to
administer justice in accordance with the Constitution can do so when they are not required to give a
damn about the individuals guaranteed Charter rights which seriously compromises the guarantee,
wouldn’t you think?
Once you are cognizant to the facts study Lawyer Files # 1-3 found near the bottom of web site
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society which should convince you of the government
conspiracy and the need for a Public Inquiry.
So with expedience in mind with foresight, benefit of evidence they will continue in their reluctance
to investigate and being in receipt of their inane verbiage I will forward you a request for a review
and you may at that time ask the RCMP to conduct a further investigation of my complaint attentive
to the issues regarding the Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2 document and Lawyer Files #
1-3 regarding obstruction of justice in a criminal fraud committed in front of a judicator in a public
building financed to administer justice consistent with the guaranteed Charter rights.
Their response to that will be most interesting and I presume there are provisions in the RCMP Act
for a timely response.
At this time, presuming they will not investigate the government conspiracy in its entirety, a public
hearing will be in order leading to a Public Inquiry which is imminent whether or not you cooperate.
Your cooperation is inevitable sooner or later and I needn’t expand on the benefits of sooner.
Should you need any assistance you will find me most cooperative to reasonable request.
I thank you in advance and hope I have made my intentions and that which is required of you
absolutely clear.
Due to your present status of incompetence I will not burden you with further documents presently
over your heads.
We will eventually get around to them one way or another.
Frank Gallagher
PS
I am an individual of Canada and I expect equal service and benefit of your office and demand you do
not delete any further e-mails I send you which will be and are your responsibility under your
mandate.
I also advise that by deleting evidence I provide you by e-mail, which is my right is tampering and
destroying evidence pertinent to a criminal prosecution along with obstruction of justice.
I remind you I have done nothing but act responsibly and it is you who are wanting, necessitating me
to attend to the matter.
To that endeavor I will expect an immediate acknowledgement of receipt as a reply

e-mail with contents of my request attached.
38
Should that fail I will apprise you of the evidence by other means available to me.
On receipt I will expect acknowledgement by e-mail with your assurance you will cooperate in a
manner consistent with and conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and in
particular mine in efficient and effective manner with due regard to the rights of the tax payers.
These are most serious matters regarding the safety and well being of every individual in Canada and
must be dealt with due regard..
My web site and the public await your response which is of pressing concern to me and you if you are
coherent and susceptible to reason.
We will see.
It is absolutely ridiculous to use Canada Post which serves only to delay.
I am publishing everything on the web so there is no concern about privacy and confidentiality and it
would be an initiative showing your ability to think things out logically rather than stick to inane
policy due the circumstance where policy will not allow you to take affirmative action against
government corruption, conspiracy and Organized Crime as you will know when you study the
evidence.
I reiterate that you must study it to determine if it is trivia, frivolous or vexatious which it is
obviously not for the evidence is signed by government personnel and staff of the Law Society of
Upper Canada.
It’s all real, and yes you are involved with exposing it or attempting to cover it up because it most
definitely will get to a PUBLIC INQUIRY and so will you one way or another.
The consequences are your choice.
39
How would one
know when it was
received by the
Commissioner? I’ll
presume
November 16 2007
as per page 8
40
November 16 2007
a Friday so 3 days to
deliver not counting
How would one know Saturday and
when it was actually Sunday.
received?
Did it sit on someone’s
desk for a while or is it
acknowledged as it
comes in?
Obviously not the Commissioner nor is

the letter head the Commissioner’s.
I will tentatively presume this to be

standard procedure making the report
due 30 days from November 16 2007
being December 16 2007 allowing 5
days mail delivery December 21 2007
41
Received by mail
Dec.23 2007
December 31 2007 Resent by e-mail
Andree Leduc
Complaints Against RCMP
Please see attachment “Commission RCMP

Complaints Dec. 27 2007” and immediate response
required
January 2 2008 Out with the old….In with the new.
Andree
Having not received acknowledgement of receipt of e-mail I am now forced to send by fax at
undue cost to me due your failure to cooperate in a manner conducive to the well being of
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which are not being supported by government personnel,
severely compromising their safety and in direct defiance of the law and indifference to the
people who finance your services
Immediate response required …….Get up to speed……..Formal complaint coming soon

Frank Gallagher
42
Well I continued for a while into January but Andree Leduc was knocked out of the equation however
bowing consistent to the conspiracy.
Well anyway Chair Paul Kennedy was willing to give it a try, and probably accepted a little help but
certainly not from me even though I made every effort to get the truth to him.
He has acknowledged that there was plenty of evidence and lots of reiterations demonstrating
consistency in “The Spirit of the Law” without the exercise of thought, as in walking where once we
crawled and then walked and now can do it without the exercise of thoughts. I can do gum with that.
So lets have a quick look back in September when I was attempting to communicate with S.Smitt.
43
.
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]
Sent: September 25, 2008 3:15 PM
To: 'REVIEWS'
Subject: RE: Check: Correction
September 25 2008
Please make note of corrected date on page 4 of the Request Review of Complaint September 25 2008
document published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
Excerpt from page 4 follows
False statements are underlined
Paragraphs
1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to
understand the circumstances surrounding my complaint
That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report
3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s report and wishes to share with me the results.
4) He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint,
the RCMP’s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately.
He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided
to Sergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is
irrefutable to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he
refused to take the evidence I brought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that
I had been sending to Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address and I could continue to send
evidence via the same method, which I did and is all relevant up to the date I filed the complaint
with the commission November 8 2007. I presume he was instructed how to handle me before we
met on October 7 2007, (Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007)
perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent
Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the
evidence and is therefore responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul
had plenty of time to confirm whether or not the evidence was relative to the Government
Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet to be determined if Inspector Verheul
acted on his own or… consulted with his superiors.)
Please acknowledge
Frank Gallagher
From: REVIEWS [mailto:reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca]

To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Check
44
This is to acknowledge receipt of your Request for a Review. You will be receiving a
letter shortly confirming your request.
Thank you.
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
Reviews & Investigations Unit
FAX #: 613-952-8045
TELEPHONE #: 1-800-267-6637
E-MAIL ADDRESS: reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

To: REVIEWS
Subject: Check
September 23 2008 Frank Gallagher

34 Riverglen Drive
Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Keswick, On.
L4P 2P8
Canada Post: Bag Service 1722
905-476-8959
Ottawa, Ontario frank@cdf.name
K1P 0B3
Fax-613-952-8045 Manager
www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name
Re: Request Review of my Complaint

RCMP refuse to investigate
Government corruption and conspiracy
Dear Commission Representative
I have received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed by
Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area and he informs if I wish to
exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by contacting the
45
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP at Canada Post: Bag Service 1722, Fax-613-
952-8045, and
www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca
I do wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint. I have had some
difficulties communicating with Andree Leduc, Enquiries and Complaints Analyst at the 7337 137
Street, Suite 102, Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4 office so I am submitting this Request for
Review of my Complaint by both Fax-613-952-8045 and your on line form at www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca.
Andree Leduc will get the whole document by e-mail along with the rest on the AAAAALIST
All pertinent evidence regarding this Request for Review of my Complaint is published or referenced
on the “RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-
disposition affiliate web site of the Charter Democracy Force
All evidence published on this site is pertinent including correspondence with Andree Leduc of your
Surrey, British Columbia Office.
The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 implicates Inspector Robert Davis to be
in on the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and the details are explained in
document “Request Review of Complaint September 23 2008” published on the aforementioned web
site of which this is the first page.
The links to the evidence originally published on the sites referenced in my original complaint to your office
November 8 2007 were corrupted so I opened a new site CDF Documents and transferred pertinent evidence
there informing Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam and everyone else published on the AAAAALIST
of the original Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force The
CDF Documents web site can be accessed from this site. .
It would be prudent to mention that I have been providing the irrefutable evidence of Government Organized
Crime of corruption and conspiracy to Sergeant Michael Thomson of the Milton RCMP office since January 18
2006 when he responded to the evidence I originally left with Inspector Peter Goulet of the Newmarket
detachment dated November 15 2005.
On January 3 2006 Inspector P. Goulet wrote to inform the evidence was originally reviewed by members of the
Federal Enforcement Section and it was learned I was concerned about possible offences under the Canada
Business Act.
The Act falls under the investigative mandate of the RCMP Commercial Crime Section also located in
Newmarket and was being forwarded on to them for review.
I had indeed originally requested the RCMP address the relative issues regarding my former tenant Don Wilson
president and director of Bio Safe under the Canada Business Corporations Act, Part XIX Paragraph 229 (1)
having already attempted to get the York Regional Police to deal with Don Wilson under the Criminal Code and
Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but they declined to do so.
By the time I went to the RCMP with the November 15 2005 cover letter and evidence I had already tried
several government departments to address the issues that occurred June 30 2005 at the ORHT but to no avail, so
that is the reason I presented the issues in different manner under the Canada Business Act to try my luck that
way.
This is all documented on the Golden Rule for Society …Gold for Law Society web site
http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society-
46
under the heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police Compiled A – C documents now available on the
“RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” web site along with other pertinent evidence.
You must remember I was just a victim experienced in another field of endeavour with no experience in how the
police carried on business at the time and simply provided the evidence that crimes had been committed by my
former tenant and president of a company that I had invested in and thought they would be dealt with by
professional people in these matters not realizing I had to dot (t) s and cross (i) s and follow procedures I was not
aware of or experienced in.
I was under the opinion at the time that the people financed all government personnel involved in the
administration and enforcement of the law to be proficient competent responsible and irreproachable with
fortitude and conviction to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter of equal
protection and benefits consistent with the Constitution and the Police Services Act.
My opinion has never wavered.
Police Services Act

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc
Declaration of principles
1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:
2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they
serve.
It is all about common sense and the law, not aware at the time the absence of it throughout the
personnel of the system but with further thought and reason determined it was too consistent to be
incompetence and eventually proved it was deliberate organized crime of corruption and conspiracy by
members of the Law Societies beginning in the very first line of the Charter, all documented on the
web sites.
The Sergeant Michael Thomson e-mail dated January 18 2006 specifically states that I proposed an
investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of the Canada Business Act and as such investigated
the evidence
This information is all published on my web sites that RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam
investigated and states in his interim report dated May 20 2008 that he felt he should be thorough and
thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence.
Since Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area does not comprehend
the need to be competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction for the safety
and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms nor is
he competent to command a police force consistent with the Police Services Act I will just address the
issues he stated in his September 3 2008 Final Letter of Disposition, which is self-evident
47
In such serious matters of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy well documented
and filed with you on November 8 2007 and studied by Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam in a manner he
felt was thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence as he
states in his interim report dated May 20 2008, and finally completed on July 11 2008 as stated in the
letter from the Professional Standards Unit signed by Sergeant Karen Delorey, after 8 months of
studying the prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime of corruption
and conspiracy published on my web sites that had been provided to Inspector Brian Verheul, Milton
detachment via e-mail addressed to Sergeant Michael Thomson since January 18 2006 it is
incomprehensible that the final 2 page report dated September 3 2008 by Superintendent Robert Davis
only contained a little more than one page of relative text, especially since he states Staff Sergeant R.B.
MacAdam was a veteran investigator.
It states in the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP pamphlet Andree Leduc mailed
me when confirming my complaint that if the CPC carries out a further investigation an investigator
will gather all the information relevant to the complaint and will conduct interviews with me, the
RCMP members(s) involved, and any witnesses.
The pertinent evidence is published on my Charter Democracy Force web sites aforementioned and the
report by Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is now pertinent evidence having spent 8 months studying the
evidence thorough and thoughtful and of course he is a pertinent witness to attest that the report the
RCMP present at the review is in fact the report that he prepared for the investigation of the complaint.
Superintendent Robert Davis is also a pertinent witness to attest that the final report he sent me after 1
¾ months reviewing Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report is indeed the report he prepared.
I ask that you immediately request a copy of Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report to ensure no
time is allowed for a fixed new replacement report.
A copy of Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is enclosed.
It is within your competence to determine if they are consistent with each other.
Address of contents of Superintendent Robert Davis dated September 3 2008
False statements are underlined

Paragraphs
1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to
understand the circumstances surrounding my complaint
That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report
3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s report and wishes to share with me the results.
4) He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint,
the RCMP’s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately.
He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided
to Sergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is
irrefutable to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he
refused to take the evidence I brought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that
48
I had been sending to Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address and I could continue to send
evidence via the same method, which I did and is all relevant up to the date I filed the complaint
with the commission November 8 2007. I presume he was instructed how to handle me before we
met on October 7 2007,
Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007
perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent
Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the
evidence and is therefore responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul
had plenty of time to confirm whether or not the evidence was relative to the Government
Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet to be determined if Inspector Verheul
acted on his own or… consulted with his superiors.)
It is superfluous to just stick with the complaint I filed November 8 2007 against Sergeant Roy
Steinebach and Inspector Brian Verheul. They have some splainin to do as does Superintendent
Robert Davis that will inevitably lead to their superiors.
I complained of Government corruption and conspiracy and they refused to investigate, and
when Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam investigated the evidence thorough and thoughtful when
forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence, in order to determine which was relevant he
had to be thorough and thoughtful as he stated he was.
That remains to be seen but Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is self- evident he is not.
I reiterate all police have a responsibility to be consistent with the Police Services Act and the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and
benefits and it is each person’s superior that is responsible to see that they are competent
responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual as guaranteed
with particular attention to victims, attentive to any flaws in the system that should be addressed
to prevent such reoccurrences to some other individual.
Police Services Act

2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter
of
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities
they
serve.
Obviously Inspector Robert Davis has insulted my intelligence and demonstrated his
incompetence for success as either the bad or good guy.
49
You will see in many of my writings I presumed the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot had
been consulted and it was he who actually is behind the refusal to investigate along with
Minister of Public Safety and so on right up to the DOJ and higher.
5) Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s investigation revealed when I attended the Toronto North
Detachment on October 18 2007 and met with Sergeant Steinbach, it was not to make a new
complaint but rather to provide more documents with respect to the same complaint I had
previously made to the Commercial Crime Section (CCS). I was advised in 2006 that CCS
would not be investigating this complaint and I was provided with the rationale for that decision
being informed the Department of Justice had been consulted prior to responding to me.
As previously stated only the first file I provided to Inspector Peter Goulet dated November 15
2005 made reference to the Canada Business Act issues that Sergeant Michael Thomson
addressed in his report on January 18 2006.
From then on it was all about Government Organized Crime of

corruption and conspiracy and the refusal of the YRP, OPP, RCMP and
many government departments and agencies to deal with the issues
which led to the Ontario Attorney General who advises them all and he
is the “guardian of the public interest” which he refuses to guard.
5a) Sergeant Steinbach declined to take more documents and explained the CCS Intake process to
me.
I printed out the evidence to take down to him because the RCMP web site stated they do
not
take evidence by e-mail.
He refused to take the evidence stating he already had it because the evidence I had been
sending via Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address was being kept on file and he
already had a copy of the recording of the ORHT hearing that I provided with the
November
15 2005 evidence I gave toInspector Peter Goulet.
5b) He did however tell me that he felt that my complaint was too vague and over reaching
and that it did not meet the CCS Investigational mandate.
He refused to look at the evidence I brought with me and the evidence on the web sites is
not vague at all.
He did not state the evidence was vague and over reaching and the evidence irrefutably
proves his opinion as to the relevancy of Government Organized Crime of corruption and
conspiracy is valueless and I suspect that he is not all that familiar with the file and was
just acting on instructions.
5c). He also told me that there was already a file open regarding my allegations and went on to
explain that it did not necessarily mean that the RCMP was going to investigate the
complaint.
(Sergeant Steinbach told me for certain the RCMP was not going to investigate the
complaint)
6) Inspector Verheul did not deal with me directly, but he did provide direction to Sergeant
50
Thomson, my principle contact person, that if material being submitted continues to relate to
the
issues already reviewed then nothing further should be done than to place a copy of the
correspondence on the file.
As previously mentioned Inspector Verheul is responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions and when
I brought the matter to his attention prior to filing the complaint he should have looked into it and
he has had plenty of time since as he has been provided all the evidence the same as the rest of the
people whose e-mail addresses are in the AAAAAALIST document published on the original
Charter Democracy Force web site
7) In the course of his investigation Staff Sergeant MacAdam also determined that my initial
complaint involving my investment in Mr. Wilson’s company and the Ontario Rental Housing
and Tenant’s Act dispute was reviewed and that I was advised in writing that the matter was
most
appropriately handled through the civil provisions provided for in the noted statute and that no
criminal investigation would be undertaken
I presume reference is being made to Sergeant Michael Thomson’s January 18 2006 e-mail again.
He has to fill in the report somehow. Heaven knows I am not referring to reiterations being
particularly reiterative myself. I am noting the struggle to put something to paper that looks
legitimately convincing.
8) When I was not satisfied with that response I wrote back the same day and Sergeant Thomson
wrote his second letter dated February 7th 2006, further explaining that if I suspect criminal
activity, the police service with primary jurisdiction would be responsible for investigating the
allegations and it seems the Ontario Provincial Police had also reviewed my complaint and had
referred me to the York Regional Police as the police services of jurisdiction. It was established
as well that I had met with the YRP previously and was told that the matter was civil and that
they would not be conducting an investigation.
I do not seem to have a copy of that letter in my computer files, perhaps in my 3’ stack of hard copy
but it is irrelative.
The police sent me in circles as to who had the authority whereas the YRP was the original police
force of jurisdiction but they have persistently refused to look into the Government Organized Crime
of corruption and conspiracy, the same as the OPP and the RCMP whereas they all have been
provided the same evidence.
9) After careful consideration of the details surrounding my complaint, he finds no evidence that
indicates that Sergeant Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and furthermore he
supports Inspector Verheul’s directives, given the nature of the file and the documentation
being
provided.
There you have it, after careful consideration he finds no evidence that indicates that Sergeant
Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and further more he supports Inspector Verheul’s
directives.
Was it he Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area that gave the
order not to investigate? Was it an obvious decision for him? Did he need to bother consulting with
his superiors?
That is yet to be determined!!
51
10) If I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by
contacting the CPU at the Ottawa office
Of course I wish to exercise my right!!!

That is what this all about. Right?
I see Inspector Brian Verheul is retired now ( bottom of his 2nd page).
Before Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam finished the investigation he was provided a new job( See
his May 20 2008 interim report) with NCO i/c after his name as Occupational Health and Safety
Services “O” Division/ Return to Work/Medical Discharge Facilitator of Occupational Health
and Safety Services “O” Division
As predictable as the likelihood of people becoming victims with government members of the
Law Societies holding every position of authority in the legal system who are not required to give
a damn about every individuals guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits nor is
the Law Society of Upper Canada required to examine evidence provided in support of
complaints against their members.
See the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document published on the original Charter
Democracy Force web site.
CanLaw National Lawyer Referral Service confirmed this on their web site www.canlaw.com
and I copied other evidence from their site, which they were not too happy about which you will
see published on the Charter Democracy Force web site.
All evidence referred herein is published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and was e-
mailed to everyone on the aforementioned AAAAAALIST and they were provided with the web
site addresses they would be published on.
********************************************************************************
**
It is predictable you of the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP will be orchestrated
by the superiors of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy as it is apparent
they already caused Andree Leduc to not cooperate with me.
You will find that information on the “RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” web site or referenced where
you will find all the evidence stated herein, and quite probably more.
The evidence is irrefutable of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and with
the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 they are securely implicated in the
conspiracy.
Now it is your turn to provide us the irrefutable evidence of the Commission for Public Complaints
Against the RCMP for the public to see which you really have no choice but to cooperate with the
conspiracy or cooperate consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights.
Of course this document will be e-mailed to everyone on the AAAAALIST and many others.
52
I will expect acknowledgement of receipt of the first page of this document informing you where the
rest of it is published and the other pertinent evidence.
Should you have any problems with the links to the documents or web sites please do not hesitate to
contact me at frank@cdf.name
The same if you need any help understanding the evidence or should you require more evidence,
anything at all please do not hesitate to contact me.
Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force
PS
You have more than enough to demand a Public Inquiry if you can find someone you can demand.
Perhaps you can find a way to get the information to the media.
You will read throughout the correspondence every government department and agency suggesting I
get a lawyer and deal with my personal issues, as they like to say, in civil court.
The July 26 2008 Saturday Star headlined the serious situation that the Middle Class cannot afford to
access the civil courts costing $60,000 for 3 days and the media who are on the AAAALIST have also
been provided the evidence of precisely what I informed them more than three years ago which they
attempt to orchestrate themselves out of this one.
Invariably everything they do is corrupt and they have no choice but to continue in their ways when
they are confronted but the jig is up.
There is always the option of finally doing things legal consistent with the Constitution conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
That would require restructuring and come right out and fess the truth something they are not familiar
with so it could be somewhat clumsy.
From : Michael Thomson <Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

Sent : January 18, 2006 12:51:19 PM
To : <franklyone@hotmail.com>
CC : "Mona Eichmann" <Mona.Eichmann@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Subject : BioSafe Natural Products Inc./ Bio-Safe Natural TechnologiesInc.
53
Dear Mr. Gallagher:
I have reviewed the documents, forwarded to our office here, that were submitted to our
Newmarket Detachment. You have proposed an investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices
of the Canada Business Corporations Act,Chapter C-44 (CBCA) and as such, this matter has been
taken by our office for review.
A review of the matter has been completed and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been
consulted in terms of prosecution under the jurisdiction of this Act.
Unfortunately, Part XIX, and Section 229(1) CBCA and thereafter of the Act is quite specific
in the terms of the investigation and enforcement of same. This is entirely a civil procedure
that requires the Court to issue an Investigation Order and thereafter appoint an
Inspector. The Inspector has specific authorization allowing entry and examination of the
corporation's books and records. These duties are outlined in Section 130(1) CBCA. Part
XIX.1 outlines the apportioning of the award of damages, and Part XX outlines remedies,
offences and punishment.
Mr. Donald WILSON's assertions that a subpoena and/or a search warrant are required in order
to allow the shareholders to review the companies' books and records are erroneous, as
outlined in Section 21 (1-10) CBCA.
It is the judgment of DOJ and this office that this matter lies solely within the confines
of civil litigational procedures, and as such, DOJ will not consider prosecuting this matter
and no investigation will be undertaken by this office. An attempt has been made to verbally
convey this message via telephone, however the number provided appears to be the number of a
fax machine. The information provided will be kept on file for intelligence/ information
purposes only. If you have any further questions, these may be directed to the Writer at
the numbers listed below.
Yours truly,
M.J. Thomson, Sgt.

NCO i/c Central Intake & Admin. Support.
Greater Toronto Area - Commercial Crime Section,
Milton, Ontario
(905) 876-9656
(905) 876-9757 (Fax)
michael.thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sent: September 18, 2008 8:21 AM
To: 'complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca'
Subject: FW: Request Review of Complaint
September 18, 2008

Andree Leduc
I have not yet received acknowledgement of receipt of the e-mail I sent September 11 2008.
54
Please respond as to what actions you have taken regarding these most serious issues.
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Manager

To: 'complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca'
Subject: Request Review of Complaint
September 11 2008
Commission for Public Complaints Against The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
7337 137 Street, Suite 102
Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4
Fax 604-501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca
Attention Andree Leduc

Frank Gallagher
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316 Manager
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317 Charter Democracy Force
Re: Request Review of Complaint
Dear Andree Leduc
I hope you will be more cooperative than when you last wrote in December 2007 and refused to respond to my
several attempts to have you confirm that you will and make some effort to be competent when this inevitable
day arrived to request a review of my complaint against the RCMP as I am not satisfied with their deliberate
incompetence consistent with the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.
Given the evidence and particular circumstances it would ne naïve of me to believe anything other than you are
under the thumb of the major players of the conspiracy but never the less I must go through the motions
following the modus operandi of the government documenting every step of the way for both present and future
use.
.You will notice how FFF, Forthright Forthcoming and Forthwith I endeavour to be expecting the same in return
and of course when not, it is painfully obvious and though I would prefer appropriate action from you I have
learned to settle for more evidence as if I didn’t have enough already.
From the tone of my writing it is hoped you will comprehend that what concerns me does concern you one way
or another and all I can do is hope that you understand that I am a victim requesting justice as detailed on the
Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites although in reference to the evidence
originally attached to the complaints you will find it on the original Charter Democracy Force site
55
There is sufficient evidence there that demands the RCMP look into in the 15 Lawyer Files and the Mad, Glad
mostly Sad….Why document that asks many questions Why that need to be formally answered even though they
answer themselves.
I have made note of some very significant serious problems within the upper command of the RCMP in the
following pages, which includes a copy of their Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008.
I believe considering your admittance of incompetence that this is a case of rare circumstance and at
the discretion of the Chair of the CPC request the CPC become involved and conduct its own
investigation in the public interest or conduct a public interest hearing or both.
Please acknowledge receipt and your intent to cooperate
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
September 11 2008
Golden Rule
Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC

“Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself”
56
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE,
RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY …finally I began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume
was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
Jesus
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
Jonathan Swainger
University of British Columbia history professor
Edmund Morgan’s compelling book “Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and
America” opens with an assertion that the success of any form of government requires the acceptance of a
number of fictions. In democracies for example, it is necessary for the population to “believe” that the people
have a voice or…that the representatives of the people are the people”
Frank 1942 AD – 200_
Manager, Charter Democracy Force
When truth of a CONSISTENCY to a thing is the ultimate quest, the thing is self-evident even though
supported by only one statement is self sufficient, impervious to any number of CONSISTENCIES of truths that
do not maintain a CONSISTENCY with the thing .
When all is said and done and such inconsistency remains adverse to the CONSISTENCY of the thing deception
and prevarication is self-evident.
When persons develop prevarication to perfection they invariably deceive themselves making them
inane to any purpose vulnerable to sane purpose of humongous advantage to the Charter Democracy
Force maintaining CONSISTENCY to a thing fair and relevant to all of the moral society of the
Constitution of the democracy of Canada where eradication of amoral inclination is its purpose.
57
The painful obviousness of that which is predictable becomes pathetically more nauseating when proven true.
One charged with a crime can not be judged by the amoral and most definitely not by oneself.
CONSISTENCY to evade the purpose of truth

with irrelevant unfounded truths consistently
reveals the truth whether they are truths or lies
where Reality is the truth impervious to
perception yet precisely due to perception.
When ones mandate is to meet with a person

to pay them back $5 owed and finds them
lying in the street in pain a competent report
on the incident, no matter how thorough to
mandated purpose should include mention of
the victim, how he or she got there, and what
initiatives were taken to secure their safety
and wellbeing and was there any obvious
hazards that could be removed to ensure no
reoccurrence.
Due diligence to a purpose when the safety

and wellbeing of every individual is severely
jeopardized weighs heavy on the ability of an
authority assigned responsibility and the
report is self-evident
58
59
Priority
Police Services Act

2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities
they serve.
In which way does a preponderance of paper proliferated with words protect every individual as
guaranteed by the Charter?
Of what purpose are such words and those found in the Constitution if staff is without principles?
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
physical disability.
Incompetence is a relatively simple matter to deal with when competence is the quest by all concerned
Deliberate incompetence is a simpler matter to deal with when incompetence is the quest by all
concerned
When there is an obvious CONSISTENCY of incompetence it could very well be the person who
perceives the CONSISTENCY of incompetence to be obvious is personally consistently incompetent.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.
Considering every individual’s safety and well being is at stake consistent CONSISTENCY of those
people assigned the responsibility to protect every individual equally as guaranteed is mandatory either
stated or implied.
Similarly and most assuredly government personnel financed to administer and enforce the provisions
of the Constitution must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and
conviction meaning they must be aware of their legitimate purpose and the serious ramifications upon
society should the CONSISTENCY not be consistently monitored and maintained.
60
The consequences of neglect are of the most serious nature to the public interest and most assuredly the
Attorney General of Ontario is the “guardian of the public interest” as the “Roles and Responsibilities
of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site attests.
CONSISTENCY is also prerequisite in the safety and wellbeing of personnel involved in the
government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.
The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force was collected by me Frank Gallagher who
became lucidly alert on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing to the fact I had
been victimized by my former tenant DON Wilson president of a company I had invested in.
Over a period of three years I presented the irrefutable evidence of the crimes to a preponderance of
prominent government personnel, media and others whose e-mail addresses in the AAAAALIST
document are published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site
The CONSISTENCY of their do not give a damn attitude about the Constitution and the individual’s
equal guaranteed Charter rights indicative of the spirit that emanates from the Law Society of Upper
Canada demonstrated in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document is overwhelming and
pathetically incomprehensible in terms of incompetence and ignorance to legitimate purpose.
So overwhelming that stretches far beyond the realm that such incompetence could be achieved
naturally and already certain there was much more to this than meets the eye turned my efforts to
divulge the root of the problem that led me right back to that which was immediately apparent at the
beginning that the office of the Attorney General of Ontario was behind it all, being advisor to the
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing John Gerretsen who was responsible to monitor compliance
with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but demonstrated an irresponsible indifference to his
responsibility.
This is all detailed in the 15 Lawyer Files, which we are all quite familiar with by now. Right?
Well to save me time and everyone else concerned the evidence published on the Charter Democracy
Force irrefutably proves the incompetence of the entire legal system to protect every individual equally
as guaranteed by the Charter but at the same time demonstrates an uncanny CONSISTENCY to protect
every individual involved in the conspiracy from the people adverse to the moral legitimate purpose
that they have the people “believe”
So CONSISTENT and so obvious that any sane person of moral thought and reason can discern the
truth that what we have here in Canada is government organized crime personified.
The RCMP who studied the evidence since I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against
the RCMP November 8 2007 not November 7 2007 as suggested in their “Final Letter of Disposition
had to wade through the evidence which was apparently either over their heads or was simply of no
concern to them as they did their Law Society rendition of pathetic injustice oblivious to “The Spirit of
the Law” and the vital role evidence plays.
Well, the RCMP had an opportunity to show their stuff and blew it miserably incompetent to the
conspiracy and most assuredly no semblance at all to what is expected of a competent responsible
61
irreproachable entity of fortitude and conviction in continuity to support a moral society conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed equal Charter rights.
Such lame excuses to avoid addressing the major issues and even in what amounts to a one full page of
response maintains an inconsistency with actual fact, but then competence to any purpose is not
expected of them from their superiors so what you see is what you get and the public has no choice but
to forget it and move on to retain their sanity.
Perhaps all the inconsistencies are deliberately entered to draw ones attention to them and would be of
no avail to argue, petty in nature distracting from the obvious serious issues they obviously never
intend to address.
Perhaps they are intended to infuriate me so I will respond insanely providing them opportunity to
divert the issues to a mental instability.
Well, that does not work absolutely inane to competent responsible irreproachable sane moral purpose.
Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception
The truth cannot change but perceptions are vulnerable and fickle things.
They will allow you to believe you are cunning intelligent above many, provide you confidence and
arrogance…and stuff like that.
Simple fact is it will betray you.
Do not believe?
Have a serious look at the Final Letter of Disposition from the point of view of an individual of the
moral
majority who once believed their Charter rights secure and were treated fairly as if in a democracy.
The government organized crime has clearly been proven to be initiated at the top but its success is
dependent on the ignorance and cooperation of the ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE.
As the economy gets worse nature will take its course has history attests and be assured we of the
Charter Democracy Force will humongously increase our efforts to the resolve necessary to prevention
of the predictable unnecessary chaos.
One has to wonder if terrorists is just a word attached to groups who are well aware that sane peaceful
initiatives to fair sane moral purpose of sane moral thought and reason is impossible with greedy
imbeciles devoid of conscience inept to sane moral thought and reason.
It seems to me the manipulative abilities of international corporate conglomerates and the humongous
advantage the affluent and influential have illegitimately over the people of the Lower Tiers the World
Trade Center was a likely target when the people are driven insane by the insanity of it all left
unchecked.
Anyway, the people have a right to know what is published on the Charter Democracy Force web site
and with phase one now complete with the irrefutable evidence the upper echelon of the RCMP are
62
involved we can now direct our efforts full time to spreading the truth and we thank you for that for
making it so vividly clear.
This document “ReceivedSeptember102008” will be published in its appropriate place on the “RCMP
Final Letter of Disposition” web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition
I need not mention how severely disappointed we are at but nothing we had not expected and certainly
nothing we were not prepared for.
We will give the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP one more opportunity to
demonstrate their incompetence to serve the people consistent with the Constitution and of course make
a formal request to the RCMP Commissioner to investigate the government organized crime as
evidenced on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name which Robert Davis,
Superintendent, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area was kind enough to admit as did Staff
Sergeant R.B. MacAdam that you have possession of the evidence or access of all the evidence on the
web sites but have chosen to ignore it with blinders on and chose to emphasize your sole mandate was
to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately
This is how my first conversation with Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam began when he phoned me to see
if I would come down to the Newmarket office to discuss the complaint and now 10 months later the
incompetence remains..
It was about 3 weeks after he began looking into it on a part time basis he informed and at first I agreed
to go down, but when I asked if he had looked at the evidence on the web site he said no, he was just
investing the complaint against the RCMP members.
He had not yet talked to the 2 RCMP members and not looked at the evidence and he wants me to
come down.
I questioned how could he possibly determine if they acted appropriately with out looking at the
evidence and of course the Law Society of Upper Canada is of the belief their member acted
appropriately without looking at the evidence and we see a significant CONSISTENCY throughout that
evidence appears to be irrelevant when members of the Law Societies are involved as the Attorney
General who plays a major role advising all government departments and agencies.
I told him he would first have to determine if the evidence was valid to the complaint or considered
trivial, frivolous or vexatious which I cited from the Complaints Commission brochure.
You state Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is a veteran investigator which hardly supports your intended
purpose when logically in the peoples minds evidence plays a major role in investigations and if your
veteran investigators are not aware the public are in serious trouble.
OOPS: They are in serious trouble aren’t they?
All that has been noted is the pathetic incompetence of the person assigned to the investigation and for
that he gets a promotion and I can expand that to see how you made it to District Commander.
63
There can be no doubt you are aware of the conspiracy because you would have to be an imbecile not
to understand what is going on if you are familiar with the evidence.
Of course that has crossed my mind in earlier writings that for the government organized crime to be
successful persons in you positions have to be selected from the incompetent or cooperative to the
conspiracy permitting its persistent existence.
You have made reference to issues being discussed with the DOJ, which is absurd as the evidence
clearly shows the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada are major players in
the conspiracy.
I know it appears that I am addressing these issues to you in an effort to make you people understand
the error of your ways but we know you are well aware, however it is imperative the public clearly
understands and it is to that endeavour I am most attentive.
I presume your efforts are addressed similarly and I have to inform you the intended recipients of this
information are hardly as dumb as they would have to be to comprehend any reason for you not to act
on their behalf consistent with the Constitution.
Meanwhile I am requesting every recipient to jump in and act appropriately on behalf of the people in
legitimate support of the sanctity of the Canadian Constitution.
The inane dribble you offered as a competent responsible irreproachable response may well be what
you believe but as always evidence begets the truth and you people simply must familiarize yourselves
with the concept.
You state Sergeant Steinbach told me that my complaint was too vague which is utter nonsense but I
know after 10 months study of the evidence that is so overwhelming with nothing left to debate and out
of hundreds of pages of evidence you had to at least fill one page with something and why not utter
crap that comes so readily.
Given the most serious nature of the issues it is incomprehensible to suggest every (i) should be dotted
and (t) s crossed where if you were the competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and
conviction to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights you would have laid out the red carpet and
thanked me for all the investigative work I did to help you better serve the public interest and Attorney
General Chris Bentley “guardian of the public interest” should have been pleased if not for the fact he
is the major player along with the DOJ.
You mentioned I was provided with the rationale back in 2006, January as I recall and that was an
entirely different matter when after the York Regional Police demonstrated their incompetence to deal
with the issues as well as many other government personnel I thought I would try in addition to address
the matter under the Corporations Act….whatever they call it further demonstrating Don Wilson’s
character but Sergeant Thomson pulled one of your tricks emphasizing that he was addressing the
issues that I had presented back in November 2005 I believe it was, maybe early December under the
auspices of the Corporations Act …whatever but since then I have provided the RCMP a
preponderance of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime if you care to stay to pertinent
point, and it was delivered by e-mail via the Michael Thomson e-mail address and Sergeant Roy
Steinbach acknowledged they had the evidence on file including a disk recording of the Tribunal
hearing.
64
That is why he refused to accept the evidence I brought down because he stated they already had it.
Everything I am stating now is just reiterating the prodigious amount of reiterations published on the
web sites and all you have demonstrated is your incoherence to the evidence and your irresponsible
attitude towards the necessity of a responsible investigation on behalf of the people.
I have no further interest in addressing the crapola contained with your Final Letter of Disposition
when the evidence published on the web sites bares the truth and your report bares the truth of the
incompetent and irresponsible ineptness of the RCMP to protect the people as guaranteed by the
Charter when you make every effort to avoid the truth that lies within the evidence you stumbled over
looking for something to put in your one page letter of content.
Well the evidence stands for itself, not debateable and yet fools rush in to give it a try.
Gee, that segues me to the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP who were kind
enough to explain their incompetence and were determined not to get any wiser, no matter how hard I
tried.
I informed them this day would come and if they had of started getting prepared back in December
2007 they would be competently prepared so now we get to see the results.
Why would they want the public to know they are incompetent?
Don’t answer, we know don’t we?
They really are cooperative with the conspiracy but they were hired specifically for their incompetence.
Anyway I leave you all to ponder your decisions while we test the Complaints Commission.
Frank Gallagher
Manager
PS
I did make mention I am not satisfied with your incompetent irresponsible trivial, frivolous vexatious
Final Letter of Disposition didn’t I?
I suppose the obvious does not require the formality.
If I seem a little frustrated and perhaps a bit irate perhaps if we looked at the evidence we could
determine the cause and help me out.
OOPS, silly me, I keep forgetting you are not required to give a damn but when the opportunity arises
make a kind gesture.
One more time I state unless the evidence that had been provided to the RCMP up until October 18
2007 has been thoroughly examined as to its validity of the charges of government organized crime of
65
corruption and conspiracy the RCMP have demonstrated their incompetence to protect the public
interest.
Obviously the District Commander provides a good example of the incompetence that must ran
rampant throughout the force.
We cannot have that can we?
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
Well, I intended to go through the Chair of the Commission for Publics Complaints Against the
RCMP, Paul Kennedy’s report point by point, but what is the point as he has said it all having admitted
that he gave it his best shot with a careful examination of the evidence and attempting to have the
people believe that the Commission is independent of the RCMP being an agency of the federal
government being like brother and sister, brother and brother or sister and sister as you prefer whereas
the January 22 2007 letter from the DOJ clearly states the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
Canada is the chief legal advisor of all government departments and agencies who advises the Minister
of Public Safety who was Stockwell Day when he wrote his e-mail to me November 2 2007 clearly
stating he was accountable to the Public and Parliament for the RCMP.
That you Paul for clarifying where your authority came from and that word again “Threshold” that no
government department, agency, York Regional Police would explain the meaning of the word in terms
of why the evidence I provided of the criminal offences my former tenant committed on June 30 2005
at the ORHT which has caused me to write all these lengthy letters of reiteration upon reiteration.
75
Considering the humongous seriousness of the issues it is imperative that we communicate with
nothing but the truth aware of the significant role evidence plays in any investigation and
necessity of competent responsible irreproachable personnel truly unbiased absent of artistic
licence
As of January 3 2009 it will be three years since I provided RCMP Inspector Peter Goulet the
irrefutable evidence of the criminally fraudulent offenses committed by my former tenant Don
Wilson regarding shares of his company Bio Safe Natural Technologies Inc. that I was a major
share holder and had caused approximately 10 of my friends to invest in the Company having
paid out over $100,000 but the original Certificates he provided were not the proper ones and not
signed as I was informed at a meeting with a lawyer. The name of the company on my Purchase
Agreement of February 1 2004 was Bio Safe Natural Products Inc. but later when friends of mine
invested the name used on their Purchase Agreements was BIO Safe Natural Technologies, which
I later looked into to find out that he had changed the name of the company January 27 2004
Having a few other concerns I had Don sign other agreements to cover them and eventually had
him sign the April 13 2005 agreement that dealt with the serious issues of the original Purchase
Agreement where he agreed to provide us all new proper Purchase Agreements and certificates
including the 10 investors who had invested in the company listed on our Purchase Agreements
before we came on the scene.
This has been explained many times and these agreements from my understanding of what the
previous investors put into the company and I and my friends did the paper value was at least
$200,000 dollars, plus the $8,000 rent he owed me and $10,000 in personal loans.
By him denying ever seeing or signing the April 13 2005 and a later May 6 2005 agreements,
both signed with the same signature and I provided the witness to the April 13 2005, who attested
that Don signed all four pages before he signed to witness them makes it compelling evidence he
had defrauded my friends and I being an offense under section 380 (1) of the criminal code.
Paul’s first paragraph requires lengthy documents to respond to providing the truth.
It is a simple world they live in being a conspirator with the entire government legal system of
especially trained charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration all one
sided.
76
Criminal Code
The Constitution Act, 1982 enacted by the representatives of the people that came with a
guarantee signed by the provincial governments.
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees
the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such
reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be
demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
society.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the
equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in
particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour,
religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
77
I state the government refuses to support our individual guaranteed Charter rights of protection and
benefit providing an overwhelming amount of evidence to support it with many questions not answered
in the “Mad Glad mostly Sad …WHY?” document, the 15 Lawyer Files ...the ”2 part Law Society of
Upper Canada” document inconsistent with the Constitution
There is the “Threshold” matter which you refer to as to why the York Regional Police refused to
investigate the evidence.
Everyone has refused to answer the question which I presumed and the evidence shows a Two Tier
system absolutely inconsistent with the Constitution adverse to equality rights.
Then on your page 4 you go on to tell us about your limited resources to deal with such cases as the
criminal acts of fraud my former tenant committed always suggesting the public see a lawyer who has
far less resources at their disposal not having any one to ransack because you people beat them to it.
You people are provided the wherewithal to deal with these issues to protect us and in public tell us of
the great job you are doing while every victim knows the truth and cannot find help anywhere where
very few are prepared to take on the onerous and formidable challenge of extracting from the
government what belongs to them as an arm or a leg.
Their guaranteed Charter rights which you government people have irrefutably demonstrated over the
passed 3 ½ years all published on my web sites for all to see where none of you have provided any
evidence just citing this act or that clearly supporting what I state and the evidence supports that the
system is designed 180 degrees adverse to our Charter rights.
All the money wasted on all the inane, superfluous government departments, agencies designed to
protect the conspirators could be better used to eradicate them once and for all and then the people
could get on with their lives as guaranteed by the Charter.
If you can not put a system in place that protects every individual as guaranteed then the only logical
and legal thing to do is not protect everyone equally which is within your range of talents.
Once we start reasoning in that manner then why in hell do we need any of you?
It just doesn’t make a whole lot of sense when the majority of us are not masochists or sadists that we
should all have to finance you people.
To be continued because quite frankly Paul Kennedy it is absurd that I have to write all these lengthy
documents with evidence to support everything I state, reiterated upon reiteration in Dick and Jane
fashion and yet you can not Spot the fact the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy
is officially documented and published for all to see.
The July 26 2008 edition of the Toronto Saturday Star has admissions by prominent judges and Ontario
Attorney General Chris Bentley that the legal system is two tiered with the Middle Class made to pay
to support the criminal element that runs amuck due the governments ransacking of the populace
creating the poverty level that requires Legal Aid for the Law Society members to ransack which the
Law Society supports while the Middle Class that finances the system cannot afford to access the
system and never have been since long before 1967 when the Law Society Act was introduced.
78
The Attorney General administers the Law Society Act and is a bencher who appoints the Chair.
Who appointed you Chair, Paul Kennedy
The government members of the Law Society which is a special interest group interested in only
money have designed the system attentive to their interests refusing to protect the people efficiently
and effectively sending us to one of their unscrupulous members so they can extort money from us for
our legal right to access the courts as in section 24. (1) while they inanely debate superfluity that would
not exist if they structured the legal system consistent with the Constitution and the legitimate version
of the rule of law.
The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law
The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law
Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is
legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with
established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.
The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmark of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a
clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the
law.
The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law
has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"
Hallmark of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal
certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.
The DOJ January 22 2007 clearly states the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada advises
the entire federal government and implies the government is an adversary of the people who use our
money to protect them as they direct the people to a lawyer to fight them whereas I will win with the
evidence if I have more money and wherewithal than the government who the people unknowingly are
financing an assault against persons who are truly trying to stand up for them, with only the stones to
do it without a slingshot.
The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site clearly
states he is the “guardian of the public interest” and the “guardian of the rule of law” where the
evidence clearly shows he or any of the government departments, agencies or police give a damn about
the public interest and they are deliberately incompetent consistent with that most elusive concept –the
rule of law- a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define, that protects the individual and
society as a whole.
The legitimate Rule of Law published by the Wikipedia clearly defines the Canadian legal system.
designed by the members of the Law Societies who do not give a damn about every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights which the Ontario Attorney General plays a major role and having been
provided the “2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada” document tells me to go screw myself and get a
lawyer knowing full well I or anyone else cannot afford to do so.
79
You know what I think Chair Paul Kennedy
There is nothing to gain communicating with a Chair
Leonard Cohen sang the Truth years ago except for one minor flaw
Canada First
Music Please
Double Click
Democracy.m3u
Evidence is superfluous to they who fear it.
To the people of the Lower Tier who can handle the truth
http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/5652120?from_badge_documents_button=1
80
81
How long will truth survive?
As long as reality?
Download while it is still available
BLACK BOOK IV (Under Construction)
82

Black Book III

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Black Book III

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

January 1 2009

BLACK BOOK III

BLACK BOOK II (2)

BLACK BOOK II (1)

New Year Resolution?

The government conspirators have provided us the truth

“uRus Charter Democracy Force ROP”

If a group of people, an organization or multinationals…whatever, consistently operate inconsistent

by Reverse Osmosis Psychosis

Governments are corrupt beyond belief

Believe it and poof ...they are gone

The unscrupulous federal government wrote the law

for us to trust and believe to ransack the people of the

Their Modus Operandi is that of Organized Crime as

URUS Charter Democracy Force ROP

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability,

Charter: contract, licence, deed, agreement, bond, hire, rent, employ

Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Consistency: constancy, steadiness, reliability, uniformity, evenness, stability, regularity

Osmosis: the gradual, often unconscious, absorption of knowledge or

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.

publicly disclosed laws

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

Sanity must CONSISTENTLY prevail in "The Spirit of the Law"

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"

Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15

PoliceServicesAct.doc Declaration of principles

Bald and Two Faced Liars

The Fiction of the Attorney General

The Brainwashing of the People

First their minds then their bodies work for them

The cure: Do not Believe the nefarious bent

Did Parliament write the R & R of the Attorney General?

Downloaded from the Ontario web site

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General

The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

The Attorney General,

a clear separation of powers,??

Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))

Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))

Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))

Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))

Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of

Know the Law

Attention Andree Leduc

On my complaint I identified my mother as witnessing the refusal by Sergeant Roy Steinebach on

I believe the complaint itself is evident that it is not trivial, Right?

You don’t know right?

I suggest you make particular note of that.

To that endeavor I will expect an immediate acknowledgement of receipt as a reply

It is absolutely ridiculous to use Canada Post which serves only to delay.

The consequences are your choice.

Obviously not the Commissioner nor is

I will tentatively presume this to be

December 31 2007 Resent by e-mail

Please see attachment “Commission RCMP

Immediate response required …….Get up to speed……..Formal complaint coming soon

Excerpt from page 4 follows

False statements are underlined

1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

From: REVIEWS [mailto:reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca]

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP