Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marginal Claims
Some claims just aren’t that strong. Claims may be weak for a wide number of
sought, lack of evidence (or even a strong case) for experimental development, or even
financial costs not commensurate with the core science. Whatever the weaknesses, it is
also true that some of these marginal claims will have been prepared with the help of
SR&ED consultants. Perhaps the consultants are just “taking their best shot” on behalf of
a client. The question is: was this flawed or marginal claim submitted with the explicit
expectation that smaller claims receive less scrutiny than larger claims by large
corporations?
I believe it’s true that smaller claims have received less scrutiny in the past. I also
believe that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) often pays greater attention to larger
claims, on the grounds of “materiality”, which is accounting-speak for the fact that big
numbers are often more important than little ones. There may be a degree of relativity in
the way that the technical criteria have been weighed, between small to medium
businesses (SMBs) and larger corporations. Large corporations can afford the most expert
help, and they file large claims, and so the corporation is expected to demonstrate a more
stringent standard than may be demanded of an SMB that is perhaps just getting
introduced to the SR&ED program. I think there has always been a certain latitude or
variability in the application of such standards. What is “routine” for one company may
well be rocket science to another. The Science Reviewers try to sort it all out while trying
This document is the property of Bruce Madole, and is used by permission. All rights are reserved. The opinions expressed herein are personal, created for entertainment and
information purposes, and are not intended to be relied on in place of professional counsel or advice. No part of this document may be re-used, transmitted or re-transmitted
without the express prior written consent of the author, who can be contacted at: brucemadole@sympatico.ca
Copyright 2010 – Bruce Madole Marginal Claims
“Access” to the SR&ED program could easily become skewed heavily in favour
of large corporations if such technical standards are too rigidly applied. On the other
hand, how should we expect the CRA to behave if it were to become apparent that an
entire segment of the SR&ED “industry” had grown up around the creation and filing of
“marginal” claims, and with the explicit assumption that such claims would always fly
under the radar? Might this not be perceived as an abuse of the latitudes previously
granted? Might such an abuse not come to be perceived as “material” in its own way?
I think that such perceptions may well be a part of the CRA’s imminent
introduction of a manual for SR&ED review. If that is a part of the unspoken story, and I
believe it is, then small claimants (and the consultants who support them), should prepare
themselves for a bumpy ride over the next few years. (The best approach to a truly
marginal claim is probably to resist filing it in the first place, and that is a message for
small and large claimants alike.) The push for greater granularity and more consistent
scrutiny of claims will end up being more painful for smaller businesses than it is for
technical and financial, human and legislative, legal and political. All of us who benefit
from this program, and it is the best in the world, need to be sensitive to the rules and
-30-
This document is the property of Bruce Madole, and is used by permission. All rights are reserved. The opinions expressed herein are personal, created for entertainment and
information purposes, and are not intended to be relied on in place of professional counsel or advice. No part of this document may be re-used, transmitted or re-transmitted
without the express prior written consent of the author, who can be contacted at: brucemadole@sympatico.ca