You are on page 1of 20

PDHengineer.

com
Course № C-2020

Steel Beam Design by ASD/LRFD Steel


Construction Manual

To receive credit for this course

This document is the course text. You may review this material at
your leisure either before or after you purchase the course. To
purchase this course, click on the course overview page:

http://www.pdhengineer.com/pages/C-2020.htm

or type the link into your browser. Next, click on the Take Quiz button
at the bottom of the course overview page. If you already have an
account, log in to purchase the course. If you do not have a
PDHengineer.com account, click the New User Sign Up link to create
your account.

After logging in and purchasing the course, you can take the online
quiz immediately or you can wait until another day if you have not yet
reviewed the course text. When you complete the online quiz, your
score will automatically be calculated. If you receive a passing score,
you may instantly download your certificate of completion. If you do
not pass on your first try, you can retake the quiz as many times as
needed by simply logging into your PDHengineer.com account and
clicking on the link Courses Purchased But Not Completed.

If you have any questions, please call us toll-free at 877 500-7145.

PDHengineer.com
5870 Highway 6 North, Suite 310
Houston, TX 77084
Toll Free: 877 500-7145
administrator@PDHengineer.com
Steel Beam Design by
ASD/LRFD Steel Construction Manual
13th Edition

By Duane Nickols

Beams are flexural members that are subjected to shear and bending
moments. The shear and moment vary with position along the beam.
A beam’s primary function is resisting bending moments. Beams
usually have uniform loads, concentrated loads or both on them. We
will be looking at W shaped members. LRFD stands for Load and
Resistance Factor Design and was in three previous editions of the
specifications. ASD stands for Allowable Strength Design which is
similar to Allowable Stress Design that many engineers are familiar
with.

Types of loads

1
LRFD Load Combinations (ASCE 7-05)

ASD Load Combinations (ASCE 7-05)

We will analyze first and design later.

Let’s say we have a 26 foot long beam that is simply supported at


each end. It supports a live load equal to 0.60 k/ft and a dead load of
0.83 k/ft, including the weight of the beam.

LRFD

wu = 1.2 D + 1.6 L = (1.2 × 0.83 k / ft ) + (1.6 × 0.60 k / ft ) = 1.96 k / ft


wu L 1.96 k / ft × 26 ft
Vu = = = 25.43 k
2 2
wu L2 1.96 k / ft × (26 ft ) 2
Mu = = = 165.3 kip − ft
8 8

2
ASD

wa = D + L = 0.83 k / ft + 0.60 k / ft = 1.43 k / ft


wa L 1.43 k / ft × 26 ft
Va = = = 18.59 k
2 2
wa L2 1.43 k / ft × (26 ft ) 2
Ma = = = 120.8 kip − ft
8 8

Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)

Also M u ≤ φ M n and Vu ≤ φ Vn

Chapter F is Design of Members for Flexure

Allowable Strength Design (ASD)

Mn V
Also M a ≤ and Va ≤ n
Ω Ω

3
Limit States

We will look at six limit states. The first five are strength limit states
and the last is a serviceability limit state.

• Yielding has to do with the strength of the beam to resist


bending moments without failure. Yielding depends on the loads,
supports, span and the strength of the steel.
• Lateral-Torsional Buckling has to do with the twisting of the
beam in a lateral direction. If the beam is adequately braced, it
will not twist into failure.
• Web Local Buckling has to do with the strength of the web to
resist failure. This means the width to thickness ratio must fall
between certain limits so the web will not collapse or fail.
• Flange Local Buckling has to do with strength of the flange to
resist failure. This means the width to thickness ratio must fall
between certain limits so the flange will not collapse or fail.
• Shear has to do with shear failure of the beam. Chapter G
covers Design of Members for Shear.
• Deflection is a serviceability limit state. This has to do with the
beam deflecting too noticeable to people or so people feel
uncomfortable.

If the un-braced length, (Lb) <=Lp use equation F2-1.

Lateral-Torsional Buckling

4
Cb can be conservatively equal to 1.0
Sx comes from the shapes table
Lp and Lr can be found in Table 3-2 for W shapes in the AISC Manual or
you can calculate them from the following equations.

J is in the shapes table.

5
Now let’s say the beam we looked at before is a W14 x 30 and the
un-braced length is 26 feet. Fy=50 ksi, Sx=42.0 in3 and Zx=47.3 in3.

Yielding

Since Lb>Lp, it does not meet the limit state of yielding in equation
(F2-1).

M p = Fy Z x = (50 ksi ) × (47.3 in 3 ) = 2365 kip − in = 197 kip − ft


φM p = (0.9) × (197 kip − ft ) = 177 kip − ft
M r = 0.7 Fy S x = (0.7) × (50 ksi ) × (42.0 in 3 ) = 1470 kip − in = 122.5 kip − ft
φM r = (0.9) × (122.5 kip − ft ) = 110 kip − ft

6
LRFD

The Mu was equal to 165.3 kip-ft

From Table 3-2, AISC Manual

L p = 5.26 ft
Lr = 14.9 ft
φb M p = 177 kip − ft
φb M r = 110 kip − ft

Since the required moment, (Mu=165.3 kip-ft) is greater than the


design moment, (φbMr=110 kip-ft) and the un-braced length, (Lb=26
feet) is greater than Lr of 14.9 feet, this will not meet the limit state
for lateral-torsional buckling.

Now, let’s say we brace this beam in the middle and at each end. The
un-braced length (Lb = 13 feet). Interpolating between the above
values:

(13.0'−5.26' ) x
=
(14.9'−5.26' ) (177 kip − ft − 110 kip − ft )
x = 53.79 kip − ft
φb M n = 177 kip − ft − 53.79 kip − ft = 123.2 kip − ft

Now the design moment becomes 123.2 kip-ft. This is less than the
required moment, (Mu=165.3 kip-ft) so it will not work. No Good.

Now let’s say we brace this beam at each end and the quarter points.
The un-braced length, (Lb) will be 6.50 feet. Interpolating between the
above values, the design moment, φbMn is 168.4 kip-ft. This is greater
than the required moment of 165.3 kip-ft, so this will work. Just by
bracing adequately, the beam will not twist into failure (Lateral-
Torsional Bucking).

7
ASD

Again, we will brace the beam at each end and the quarter points. The
un-braced length, (Lb=6.50 feet). Remember from above, Ma=120.8
kip-ft.

M p = Fy Z x = 197 kip − ft
Mp 197 kip − ft
= = 118 kip − ft
Ω 1.67
M r = 0.7 Fy S x = 122.5 kip − ft
M r 122.5 kip − ft
= = 73.4 kip − ft
Ω 1.67

From Table 3-2, for W14 x 30 in the AISC Manual

Mp
= 118 kip − ft
Ωb
Mr
= 73.4 kip − ft
Ωb
L p = 5.26 ft
Lr = 14.9 ft

Mp
Since M a = 120.8 kip − ft > = 118 kip − ft , we need to select another
Ωb
beam.

Selecting a W16 x 31

8
From Table 3-2, AISC Manual

Mp
= 135 kip − ft
Ωb
Mr
= 82.5 kip − ft
Ωb
L p = 4.13 ft
Lr = 11.9 ft

Mn
Interpolating from the above values, = 118.96 kip − ft which is still No
Ωb
Good.

Selecting a W14 x 34

From Table 3-2, AISC Manual

Mp
= 136 kip − ft
Ωb
Mr
= 84.9 kip − ft
Ωb
L p = 5.4 ft
Lr = 15.6 ft
Mn
Interpolating from the above values for Lb=6.50 feet, = 130.5 kip − ft
Ωb
which is greater than Ma=120.8 kip-ft. This member is OK.

Conclusion

The LRFD member (W14 x 30) is lighter than the ASD member
(W14 x 34) but both are the same depth.

9
Classification of Sections for Local Buckling

• Compact
• Non-compact
• Slender-element

b bf h d − 2k
For W sections λ = = and =
t 2t f tw tw
Flange Local Buckling

b
It is compact if λ = ≤ λ p = 0.38 E
t Fy

It is non-compact if λ p ≤ λ ≤ λ r = 1.0 E
Fy

10
Web Local Buckling

h
It is compact if ≤ λ p = 3.76 E
tw Fy

h
It is non-compact if λ p ≤ ≤ λ r = 5.70 E
tw Fy

Now the W14 X 30 from LRFD, is it compact, non-compact or a


slender-element?

bf 6.73 in
λ= = = 8.74 this checks with the table
2t f ( 2 × 0.385 in)

λp = 0.38 E F = 0.38 29,000 ksi 50 ksi = 9.15 it is compact


y

11
Now let’s check the web.

h d − 2k (13.8 in − (2 × 0.785 in))


= = = 45.3 it is 45.4 in the table
tw tw 0.270 in

λp = 3.76 E F = 3.76 29,000 ksi 50 ksi = 90.6 it is compact


y

The W14 X 34 from ASD is also compact. In fact for Fy=50 ksi, most all
W sections have compact flanges. There are only about ten sections
that have non-compact flanges.

Shear Strength

Now recall, from page 2 and 3, that our Vu=25.43 kips and Va=18.59
kips.

LRFD

φVn ≥ Vu
Vn = 0.6 Fy Aw C v = 0.6 Fy dt w C v = 0.6 × 50 ksi × 13.8 in × 0.270 in × 1.0 = 112 kips
φVn = 1.00 × 112 kips = 112 kips
112 kips ≥ 25.43 kips OK

ASD

Vn
≥ Va
Ω
Vn 112 kips
= = 74.7 kips
Ω 1.5
74.7 kips ≥ 18.59 kips OK

12
Vn
Both of these values ( φVn and) are listed in Table 3-2 of the Steel
Ω
Manual. Only about eight W sections don’t meet the h/tw requirement.
The W14 x 30 from LRFD and the W14 X 34 from ASD meet the h/tw
requirement.

Deflection (serviceability)

Let’s say that our deflection limit is L/360. Since our span was 26 feet,
L/360=(26 feet X 12 in/ft)/360=0.867 inches. Deflection for the
member is based on service loads so that will be the same for LRFD
and ASD. We are using two different W sections so the deflections will
be different.

From page 3, our uniform service load wa=1.43 k/ft


For the W14 X 30 from LRFD, Ix=291 in4
For the W14 X 34 from ASD, Ix=340 in4

LRFD

5wL4 5(1430 lb / ft )( ft / 12 in)(26 ft × 12 in / ft ) 4


Δ= = = 1.74 in > 0.867 in No Good
384 EI 384(29 × 10 6 lb / in 2 )(291in 4 )
Try W18 X 40, I x = 612 in 4
5(1430 lb / ft )( ft / 12 in)(26 ft × 12 in / ft ) 4
Δ= = 0.829 in < 0.867 in OK
384(29 × 10 6 lb / in 2 )(612 in 4 )

ASD

The W14 X 34 didn’t work but the W18 X 40 will work.

Conclusion

Looking at the strength of the beam to resist bending moment we


came up with two different members. We braced the beam adequately
(Lb=6.5 ft) to resist lateral-torsional buckling. We determined the ASD
beam would be a W14 X 34. The beams were compact so there was no
flange local buckling or web local buckling. We checked the shear
strength of both beams and it was OK. The deflection turned out to be
the determining limit state. Based on deflection we would use the
same W section for both LRFD and ASD (W18 X 40).

13
Design W Section, Continuously Braced

Select an ASTM A992 W section simply supported with a span of 35


feet. The beam is continuously braced, so Lb=0 ft. The maximum
depth of the section is 21 inches. The limit on live load deflection is
L/360. The uniform dead load is 0.5 kip/ft and the uniform live load is
0.8 kip/ft.

Material properties:

ASTM A992 Fy=50 ksi Fu=65 ksi

LRFD ASD

wu = 1.2 D + 1.6 L wa = D + L
wu = (1.2 × 0.5 kip / ft ) + (1.6 × 0.8 kip / ft ) wa = (0.5 kip / ft ) + (0.8 kip / ft )
wu = 1.88 kip / ft wa = 1.30 kip / ft
wL (1.88 kip / ft ) × (35 ft ) wL (1.30 kip / ft ) × (35 ft )
Vu = = = 32.9 kip Va = = = 22.75 kip
2 2 2 2
wL2 (1.88 kip / ft ) × (35 ft ) 2 wL2 (1.30 kip / ft ) × (35 ft ) 2
Mu = = Mu = =
8 8 8 8
M u = 288 kip − ft M u = 199 kip − ft

L (35 ft ) × (12 in / ft )
Δ max = = = 1.17 in
360 360
5wL4 5(0.8 kip / ft )( ft / 12 in)(35 ft × 12 in / ft ) 4
I req = = = 794 in 4
384 EΔ max 384(29,000 ksi)(1.17 in)

The Steel Manual has many design aids. Table 3-3, W Shapes by Ix
shows a W21 X 44 with Ix=843 in4 will work. Table 3-2, W Shapes by
Zx shows a W18 X40 will work for LRFD but the Ix is too small. The
table shows a W21 X 44 will work for ASD and it will work for LRFD.
Table 3-10 shows a W18 X 40 will work for LRFD but the Ix is too
small. It shows a W21 X 44 will work for ASD and it will also work for
LRFD. Let’s select a W21 X 44.

14
M n = Fy Z x = (50 ksi )(95.4 in 3 ) = 4770 kip − in = 398 kip − ft

LRFD ASD

φM n = 0.90(398 kip = ft ) = 358 kip − ft M n 398 kip − ft


= = 238 kip − ft
Ω 1.67
φM n ≥ M u = 288 kip − ft OK Mn
≥ M a = 199 kip − ft OK
Ω

Vn = 0.6 Fy Aw C v = 0.6 Fy dt w C v = 0.6(50 ksi)(20.7 in)(0.350 in)(1) = 217 kip

φVn = 1.00( 217 kip ) = 217 kip Vn 217 kip


= = 145 kip
Ω 1.5
φVn ≥ Vu = 32.9 kip OK Vn
≥ Va = 22.75 kip OK
Ω

The Steel Manual comes with a CD. On the CD is a beam design


program. Here is the same example using that program for LRFD and
ASD.

15
16
17
18
Both design methods verify our previous calculations. This program is
very useful to check your calculations.

Summary

Steel beams can be designed with simple calculations, by use of tables


in the Steel Construction Manual or with computer programs. No
matter how you design the beams, they should be checked by another
method. We only looked at a beam uniformly loaded. If the beam has
concentrated loads, then there may be other limit states involved (J10
of the specification). These would be Flange Local Bending, Web Local
Yielding, Web Crippling, Web Sidesway Buckling, Web Compression
Buckling and Web Panel Zone Shear. This is beyond the scope of this
course. This course is to get designers interested in using the new
code by showing that it isn’t that hard. It doesn’t matter if you use
LRFD or ASD, both will result in a safe member.

19

You might also like