ABOUT COGNITION AND EDUCATION IN NEW AGE

I.D. Hakobian
The Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law,
44 Arami Str. Yerevan 375010,
ARMENIA

ABSTRACT

Two diametrically opposed types of modern cognition and education: eastern spiritual and
west scientific and technical are investigated on the level of foundations. They are revealing now
tendency to the unification and raising bridges from both sides.
Author brings up a question, whether is it possible to join these bridges, now hanging over an
abyss as two opposing positions, pretending for all-sufficiency and independence. And if it is possible,
then how to do it and where is the point of their intersection in the cognitive universe.
The study of these two systems of education shows that physics, creating now a theory of
torsion fields and opening an access to the vacuum energy and pretending to solve all problems of
planetary crisis, leads to the apocalypse in reality. Eastern spiritual science, denying radically the
materialistic science leads away into bygone pre-Christian spirituality, and in essence into anti-
Christian spiritual technique, i.e. the magic, secretly and irreconcilably fighting with Christ-the Savior.
The result is the same: the abyss between spiritual and natural science education is becoming more and
more deep.
Pure incorporeal spirit and body without soul and spirit are the subjects of study in one case
and another respectively. Actually, between these two opposing poles of cognition and education lies
not the abyss, dividing them, but the problem resolving the contradiction between them. This is the
problem of life, organic life, the problem of healing of man as spirit in flesh, the problem solved by
Act of Christ, His Life, Crucifixion and Resurrection of the dead.

I. INTRODUCTION
“God forbid us to live in the transition time” teaches ancient eastern wisdom, “since it
is difficult time of the end of the old and the beginning of the new”. When whole age is
drawing to a close, it seems that all the world is perishing and doomsday is occurring. Since
Atlantis and Noah’s flood, history is full of such prophecies. Holy Book foretells us about this
time as one, which may come suddenly, therefore we should be wide awake and be ready any
minute, because that time is very close (Matt. 24, 33). You can find about that not only in
canonic Gospels but in apocrypha too.
“Disciples said to Jesus, tell us how will be our end.
Jesus said, whether you discover the beginning in order to search the end.
Because in the place where the beginning is, there will be the end.
Blessed is who will stand in the beginning:
And he will perceive the end, and he will not taste the death” (1).
We have an occasion to live in that transition time when two milleniums of crucified
Christ have already passed and New Millenium of Resurrected Christ is just starting.
In the light of the conception of our time as the end of one age and the beginning of
the new one, crisis, enveloped the planet and recognized as global doesn’t seem so ominous
anymore, as it appears in the front of us in the predictions of modern futurologists, such us
Fukuyama, for example (“The end of history”), or of the philosopher Spengler (“The end of
Europe”), who talk about the end as final and hopeless, but not about the end as new
beginning.

1
 But that’s just a point, that it’s possible to see only the end on the level of separately
considered problems of ecology, power engineering, economics, public health… or
philosophy, psychology, and exact science with its technique. In order to see New Beginning
it’s necessary to comprehend and recognize something fundamentally new.
Whether this global crisis will bring us to the “end of history”, to “the end of the
world”, to “pralaya”, or mankind “will perceive the end and will not taste the death”, by
opening of a new page of history. This depends on the fact, whether the humanity will be able
to recognize the necessity of the transition from the age of Reason to the new age of
Consciousness (2) and will have time to accomplish that evolutionary transition from the
reasonable man to conscious one.
Although, there are so many talks today about Consciousness (they find even material
carrier of consciousness, as we’ll see it further), but we still live in the age of knowledge,
which are unconscious in its major part. The sum or integration of knowledge is a
“mechanical unity”, whether it’s a knowledge about material or spiritual worlds. It doesn’t
bring to its comprehension yet. Here we urgently need new, unified approach.
But we’ll not hurry to proceed further. Let’s consider first the question about the state
of modern Cognition foreshortened of education, in the concepts of authors, standing on the
leading edge of natural science or spiritual knowledge. It will be sufficient for our purposes to
consider the concepts of two modern authors, pretending for the word with an authority in the
question about the education of future, stated basically in two works. One of them is
“Education in the New Age” by Alice Bailey (3), and another one is the presentation of
academician of Russian Academy of Sciences Anatoly E. Akimov on scientific-pedagogical
Conference (4).
These are, in definite sense, two diametrically opposed approaches, pretending to
show the way of resolution of problem of the future education as the basis for overwhelming
the planetary crisis. One of them is based on the spiritual education, another one is on the
nature scientific.
“In the present time”, wrote Alice Bailey, “we are passing through the one of the
greatest natural transitional periods. We are setting foundation for the appearance of new kind
of human being, more developed unit inside of human family” (A. B. p.29).
“Thus”, said A. Akimov, “representing the point of natural science at the present stage
of development of humanity, new understanding of laws of Nature and the spreading of its
knowledge is unavoidable. This leads to the appearance of new technologies, being able to
solve the problems, supposed to be unsolvable.”
Let’s draw attention to the fact, that line of demarcation between spiritual and natural
scientific education is drawing from the very beginning. The first mentioned education hopes
to meet the crisis with appearance of new kind of human being, the second one puts in the
forefront new knowledge of “laws of Nature” and new technologies developed on their basis.
Let’s note right away that knowledge, and especially comprehension of “laws of
Nature” is indeed prevailing illusion, since the physical law, or the law of “lifeless” nature,
i.e. nature made soulless in order to measure, weigh or calculate the parameters of its physical
body, is merely abstraction, fixing pure necessity, existing in Nature. But there is not only
necessity in Nature, but also freedom. The possibility itself of existence of inorganic nature
and moreover organic one is based not so much on “iron” necessity of physical laws, as on
freedom, not only on conservation, but on changing, not so much on absolute symmetry, as on
its violations. It’s quite another matter, that man begins with study of laws before rising to the
level of perception of freedom. It’s quite natural process of scientific cognition. But we
shouldn’t make an absolute one of the sides of polarized world (divided into good and evil,
space and time, necessity and freedom, death and life…), where we live.

2
 Mathematical natural science divides nature into “lively” (organic nature is the subject
of biology) and “lifeless” (subject of physics). But who said, inorganic nature is not living? If
Nature would be dead, then we wouldn’t exist as a matter of principle. At times this principle
slips away from the attention of specialists, since it lies in the foundations of science about
“lifeless” nature, and physics doesn’t deal with the question of own foundations, and in
complete correspondence with its specific character, leaves the question to discretion of the
philosophy.
Nature is living from the crystal to last “quark”. All reasonable people, who give
credence to their own eyes and don’t loose an ability of contemplation know about that.
Meanwhile, physicists look into the world not directly, but through the “spectacles” of
some theoretical construction, based on the logical thinking. And they see only one, mentally
stopped “lifeless” face of nature. Well, here is how poet sees the nature, who can think not
only by mind and heart.
Not what you think the Nature is,
Not monument, not soulless face.
He has his soul, there freedom is
He has his language, love, and grace
Tutchev
It’s clear, that this remark concerns not only some physicist, but equally all naturalists,
who talk about physical laws as “laws of Nature”. They don’t recognize, that physics studies
only one and fixed, dead face of nature in complete agreement with its foundations, which are
not absolute of course, i.e. are subject to changing and development.
It seems, that science about “lively” nature should investigate another, “lively” face of
nature in contrast to physics. Alack, it’s not the case. Biology studies dismembered, i.e. killed
organism by the same scientific method of “the stopped moment” (Goethe) and investigates
its second side in bifacial phenomenon of life-death. In other words biology deals with
anatomy of life. In spite of biology doesn’t even have a notion of what’s the life (Philosophy
has this notion) biology actively invades into the holy of holies of organic nature, trying to
synthesize of living monsters from ready blocks, truly without knowing what it’s doing.
Besides biology not simply doesn’t know its foundations, but today the question about
whether biology has its own basis or wholly relies on physics is disputed (2a).

II. CONCEPTION OF EASTERN SPIRITUAL EDUCATION

And now let’s make a jump into the field of spiritual knowledge and education by
trying to examine what does mean Tibetan (playing the oracle through A. Beyli), when he
does speak about “appearance of new kind of human being”. Let’s emphasize once more that
to make transition from the field of nature scientific knowledge into the sphere of spiritual
one is impossible, because of abyss lying between them. However, remarkable feature of our
time is that bridges are raising up from both sides, though aren’t real attempts to join them.
Therefore we’ll be forced to skip from the bank of exact knowledge to the bank of spiritual
one and backwards, until we’ll discover a possibility of transition between them. Let’s raise a
following question: whether it’s possible to eliminate the abyss between these two adversarial
in ages fields of knowledge and education. And if it’s really possible, then how?
In the preface to the book of A. Beyli Oliver L. Raiser wrote: “Our main issue of
survival in this world, polarized in great extent, is based on all possible attempts to synthesize
both cultures, until we have time. If East will reject us in this time… it might become the end
of history for all of us as in the east, as in the west.” (B. p.8).
As we see, all hopes for the survival author connects with the possibility of synthesis
of west scientific-and-technical education, giving knowledge of physical laws and growing

3
our technical power beyond all measure and giving nothing in the sense of purely human
spiritual values, with eastern wisdom, forming the man himself. And if the synthesis of these
two main cultures of modern civilization will not have time to come about, then we are
threatened with “the end of history”. “The success in doctrine”, Raiser continued, “may be
provided if to shed light on four main questions of human existence.”
1. “What’s a man?”
Author, as they say, takes the bull by the horns, what causes a riposte of questions.
Namely what field has the competence to give the answer to this question? Is that
anthropology, psychology, biology, physiology? Or may be it’s in competence of philosophy
or anthroposophy, theosophy or spiritual science? On how many parts “man” got
dismembered in the cognition, and how to get a synthesis (not integration, i.e. mechanical
unification, but synthesis!) of these knowledge?
2. “What’s a physical universe (cosmos), where man lives?”
In what aspect? And again here is long and not complete list of sciences, polarized in
physical and spiritual parts.
3. “In what evolutionary processes human race has been formed in the matrix of the
nature, so man could become that self-conscious and creative individual, as he is
now?”
I.e. man already has become not only conscious in all fields of his activity, for
example, in science, but also self-conscious? Of course, not. This evolutionary transition from
reasonable man to conscious one is still in progress.
4. “What’s a best kind of society, we could propose for the most progressive self
evolution of human by knowing about universe and human nature?” (B.p.10-11).
By knowing? By the way, the greatest science of all, whenever existed is the science
about “scholar ignorance”, as it called by Nikolay Kuzansky. And when man-ignoramus, and
he is namely like that now, is trying to propose “the best kind of society” in his opinion (or
through misunderstanding) for “the progressive human self evolution”, then it’s at best is
Utopia, and at worst, as they say in the proverb, nothing is more dangerous than active
ignorance.
However, here is valuable the raising of question itself about insistent need of
synthesis of two cultures and two polarized systems of education, west, so called “academic”
scientific-technical, and eastern, spiritual, tending to educate “new kind of human being”,
because the alternative to such synthesis is “the end of history”.
“Achievements of science”, said Tibetan, “conquests of nations and the conquests of
the territories, all indicate to the method of Pisces with its idealism, its bellicosity, and its
isolation in all fields, religious, political, and economical. But the age of synthesis, inclusion
and understanding is close to the new education of Aquarius age.” (B. p.19).
While talking about the age of Pisces, Tibetan means the time, marked by Christmas.
This age was regarded by the symbol, zodiac sign of Pisces. This is the age of human Reason,
following by milleniums of Mysticism. In this period man cognizes world not by God’s gift of
the intuition, but by his own reason, by dismembering, destroying, killing the nature and
himself in it. His method and motto is divide and dominate; divide the world into the opposite
parts, break to pieces, elements and particles in order to investigate its arrangement in order to
possess it. And study not only in sense of material, physical structure, but also its spiritual
substance. The age of synthesis or new age of Aquarius had to be preceded by age of
division. And here by synthesis we should understand not only unification of knowledge
about physical world, but mainly spiritual healing of man. Since man is what he is doing. He
can’t be spiritually complete, living, while he is dismembering and killing the world in his
cognition.

4
 “The main need of pedagogical world today is the necessity of correlation of the
process of opening of human mentality with the world of sense, but not with the world of
objective phenomena. As long as the purpose of education will not be the human orientation
to the world of inner realities, we’ll not be able to overcome (italicized by me – I.H.).
improper accent of our time… As long as the fact of existence of highest intellect will not be
admitted, and place, which should be occupied by lowest specific intellect, as a servant of
highest one will not be clarified, we’ll not go away from excessive disposition to concrete
materialization…” (B. p.3).
We are still in the age of Reason (violence and division into masters and servants are
its peculiarities) and the transition period, when human rationality and reason rule along with
their offspring, materialistic science. Rudolph Steiner said about that science much more
tough than Tibetan. He called it “materialistic dragon”, which (if we’ll not be able to
withstand him) can lead up humanity to the jungle, where there isn’t salvation. “The dragon”
absolutely systematically has ascended the throne on the planet, since the age of reason and
rationality is its age and “overcome improper accent of our time” and bring down this “lowest
concrete intellect” to the level of “the servant” by only good intentions is impossible. To think
otherwise is Utopia, since “the weather” on the planet is made not by spiritual brotherhoods,
decided to appear openly from definite moment, not sects or spiritual schools and not even
church, but namely science with its technique and technology. Still poor recognized actions of
this “materialistic dragon” from definite time are apprehended as apocalyptic. To ignore its
actions or simply take and bring down to the level of “servant”, setting hopes upon spiritual
education, mentioned by Tibetan, is dangerous mistake. You see “if you live next to living
dragon, be kind to be considerate with him” (by J. Tolqien).
That technique of spiritual education mentioned by Tibetan has nothing to do with
materialistic science, thinking that it’s possible to neglect it. “Let’s always remember ”, he
said “that formal side of life, outer material expression is undoubtedly secondary for the
Guardians of God’s Plan and Those. Who produce new development” (made bold type by me
– I.H.).
This is generally accepted point of view of eastern pre-Christian mysticism,
considering human flesh and knowledge about it so “undoubtedly secondary”, minor and
inessential, that it was possible to relinquish from that “formal side of life”, and more
precisely saying, unceremoniously disregard it. But Tibetan goes far and by speaking on
behalf of “Guardians of God’s Plan”, i.e. on behalf of “Great White Lodge” talks about
benefit and necessity of violent surgical operation, performed by “Brotherhood”, which, as
Tibetan assures, quite controls the situation on the planet.
“One more surgical operation”, he said, “may be needed but not for
extermination, and result in end of the present civilization, but in order to disseminate
infection and get rid of fever… Death is not the trouble, we shouldn’t be afraid; the work of
destroyer in reality is not cruel and undesirable” (B. p.115). “Therefore thorough
extermination is allowed by Guardians of the Plan (at that, we, more mortals are not supposed
to know that plan, it’s known above) and intention of evil turns into good, since end is
foreseen from the very beginning, and consciousness sufficiently has matured and got
experienced (after “failed” Mission of Christ, in the opinion of Tibetan, as we’ll see it further
– I.H.) in order to leave the form for the sake of noticeable results in the future” (B. p.116).
Mask, as they say, starts get off the face, by exposing bared teeth of the beast of that
servant of Shiva and the advocate of new education. We should thoroughly investigate the
question about whether growing generation needs such kind of education in order to save the
world from disgraceful end.
But before addressing to that question, let’s make a remark of no small importance. In
spite of polar opposition of two systems of knowledge and education, divided by yet

5
impassable abyss, it’s possible to perceive that both have one common feature. Both nature
scientific and spiritual education disengage themselves from life, organic life, i.e. of that
state in which living man abides. Nature science dismembers nature and makes it soulless;
spiritual science cut off that part of it, which it considers as a secondary, inessential,
insubstantial, i.e. it got rid of physical body. In other words, in none of both cognition and
education there are not and can not be neither living man in flesh, nor living nature. In short,
both poles of spirit and matter study the state, called death on this sinful earth.
This is however absolutely natural process of cognition, and hence of education. In
order to investigate surrounding world and God, man had to loose paradise of integrated with
them existence, move away from them and set them in front of himself as different from him
essences and picture them.
In Holy Writ this moment in evolutionary development of man is represented
by parable about the Fall of Adam, tasted from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and as
Prodigal Son gone into the world and damned (or with mission?) for the cognition of death in
all its manifestations. Since by breaking off whole with God existence, he fell off life and
became mortal. But this parable is not only and not so much about the departure of Prodigal
Son, but as about his return.
Man, contemplating the Act of Creation, himself wanted to create,
And he got moved away from Father and was deep in creation.
(by Hermes Trismegist)
Man has the mission to let pass all creations through his reason and return them to
God as reasonable and intelligent and return himself as conscious and free son to God.
But let’s return to the education in new age in conception of Tibetan. Imperceptibly
equalizing Buddha and Christ in the rank of sons of God, and noting, that Buddha in contrast
to Christ perfectly fulfilled his mission of the Blooming (or Enlightenment, as it said by A.
Bayli) he continues further.
“Christ, due to achievement of Buddha and His own point of evolution, got a
possibility to open new age and make new aim, which with another divine principle was able
to enter in manifestation and be generally recognized. He established “the age of love”, by
giving people expression of new aspect, aspect of love” (B. p.65).
This thought has been logically completed in the another book of A. Beyli (5).
“Always during ages in the hour of greatest human need and in the response to the
expressed demands divine Sons of God (who came out from our midst, as it said indent above
– I.H. ) came under different names. Then Christ came and as if abandoned us (Tibetan and
A. Beyli are obviously among “abandoned”), leaving his work (not Mission, but work, i.e.
labor of slave – I.H.) unfinished and not accomplishing his vision of the destiny of human
race. It seemed two milleniums, that all his work failed, fell to the ground, was useless.” (B*.
p.41).
Well, what we can say about this combination of elementary spiritual illiteracy with
carelessness, coming up to the blasphemy!
Any layman, reading the Bible, knows that Christ is the Realization of Love and
Mercy. He is the Truth, and Life, and He is Light for the people. But where, just imagine,
you’ll find in the Bible that He brought and “established the age of love”? Is this wheeze
accidental or cunning trick? First, you build up a false conception, in order to smash it then
sufficiently earnestly. Or is it lucky combination of both?
Here is what Christ said about His Mission:
“Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come bring peace but a
sword. ” (Matt. 10, 34).
And these words are repeating over and over almost in all Gospels, even in apocrypha.

6
 “Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you, not at all, but rather
division” (Luke. 12, 15).
“May be people think that I came to throw peace (ειρηνη) on world (κοσμοξ), and
they do not know, that I came throw divisions, fire, sword, war… on earth?” (6).
What divisions, fire, sword, war brought on earth Son of Man? In the “Revelation” of
John Christ is pictured with his mouth went a sharp two-edged sword. This sword is the
symbol of Logos, Reason. Savior came in the most difficult time of establishing reason,
which was dissecting, dismembering, killing all, what it was touching. This two-edged
instrument of evolutionary development of mankind will have to cut up not only Macrocosm
and Microcosm, not only strike fire of his “Self” from man, this spark of son of God, but even
to crucify Christ Himself in cognition, and cut up His Teaching into thousand parts. And each
of these parts had to assert its own only truth. And namely in this dangerous age of all
dismembering and killing reason Savior brought His Love, in order mankind will “cognize the
end” of the age of the Reason and will “not taste the death”. Because to save the humanity,
entered the age of dedicatory cognition of death, was possible only by the Strength of Divine
Love.
The age of the Reason started in Ancient Greece, five centuries before Christ was
born. Namely, when Socrates, the teacher of Plato proclaimed the reason as top value,
everything should be given for that right up to the life. Since the age of the Reason, in fact, is
started from division into soul and body in order to investigate immortal soul in the pure
form. And what’s such a division into soul and body, which is the beginning of reasonable
cognition, if not a sacrifice of life, and first of all the life of Socrates himself on the altar of
the Reason.
Here it’s appropriate to remember ancient myth about killed and resurrected deity of
life, whose mysteries were ringing on all space of ancient world from Egypt to the banks of
Scandinavia. In Egypt it’s a myth about Osiris, deity of life, and Isida, the goddess of wisdom.
In the myth it’s narrated the story, how brother of Osiris Seth, or Thyphon, forced Osiris by
deception to fit sarcophagus, specially prepared for him, then killed him, dismembered his
body on fourteen parts and scattered all over the world. The goddess of wisdom with weeping
and plaints gathered parts of her lacerated husband and found them all, except phallus. But
Osiris himself defeated this monster Thyphon and resurrected from dead.
In the Greece it’s a myth about deity of life Dyonis, descended on earth right after his
reflection and torn by Titans. Let’s remember mystery action of Greek tragedy, where Dyonis
appeared in the mask of Oedipus, Prometheus, Orestus as deity of life suffering from his
fragmentation into individuals and where abstergent and clarifying, cathartic influence of the
tragedy was connected with the hope to be healed and to overcome this fragmentation.
It may be seemed that in the myth, this “concentrated image of the world” (Nitzshe) as
in mirror are reflected essence and sense of human evolution in the ratio of heavenly and
earthy, divine and human, spiritual and physical. Whether man, knowing how to read on the
language of symbol (besides language of information, which is used now by mankind) will
think, that reason and rationality somehow remind this vampire like monster Typhon and
Titans, who had rived deity of life descended from spiritual world to redeem our
fragmentation and heal us?
It seems that Christ is repeating the same mystery of killed and resurrected deity of
life of ancient world. However Mystery of Calvary has no analogs in human history and first
of all because it’s happening not in the pretersensual world, but on the physical plane, opened
in the front of eyes of all, having ability to see. Immortal God has been incarnated in earthy
human body in order to cognize the only thing, what was unknown to Omniscient and
Almighty Creator, i.e. death of flesh. Christ came as Redeemer of original sin of Adam,
division and death. He came to take Crucifixion on the cross of Spirit and Matter, but not in

7
behalf of death, but in behalf of Resurrection, and He opened to humanity the way to healing,
and resurrection from dead by His Act.
So, if we consider the Act of Christ in cognitive aspect, then we could see, that
Savior came in age of the Reason for clearly recognized Victim. The Crucifixion on the cross
of Spirit and Matter symbolically reflects and reveals the mystery of disruption in cognition
and the man himself in order to set straight his way to the healing not only by Faith, but by
Truth too.
“I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John, 14,6).
This way of crucifixion of man and the world in the cognition, indicated by Savior is
the necessary stage of evolution, as if repeating the sacrament of dedication, but not privy
dedication of individual elects anymore, but as evolutionary transition of humanity into the
new dimension of future spirituality and transition from man reasonable to man conscious,
opened for everybody.
“And the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.” Since now on
mystery of privy dedication had to become open.
“Veil of the temple” simply didn’t torn for Tibetan, and he dreams about the times,
when ancient mysteries will be restored. The education of the future, he is talking about, has
its aim educate to spiritual technique, magic, in the course of eastern pre-Christian mysticism.
“First issue of esoterist ”, he said, “is to catch a nature of energies. Learn however,
that these energies in itself are neither bad nor good. Great White Lodge, our spiritual
Hierarchy and Black Lodge use the same energies, but with different motives and issues. Both
groups are as a matter of fact groups of experienced esoterists”. (B. p.69).
Here we can draw one more parallel between two systems of education in our
polarized cognitive world: between ruling nature scientific, so called “academic” system and
the system of spiritual education, hidden until now, but decided to appear openly since
definite moment in view of extremely dangerous situation, prevalent on the planet. As we see,
main goal of both systems is the usage of energies. If the nature science realizes potentials of
physical laws in rough material world of “external” energies and forces, spiritual technique
does the same on the level of subtle “internal” energies. Man acts either in sensual physical
world, or in the sphere of pretersensual energies, whose influence is unseen for, let’s say,
spiritually uneducated. Here and there man becomes proficient in the technique of work with
energies, which we can use according to his own will, good or evil. So, his magical actions at
times have to be restrained in the boundaries of moral norms by forces of international law
and order or “the astral police”.
Will and “freedom of will” is real stumbling block and most difficult phase of human
education, since this is a not “the school” of spiritual education anymore, where man was
studying by milleniums (from Veda India to Plato Greece) in renunciation of “the illusion” of
the flesh, and not the school of nature scientific education, lasting by centuries, and which he
was studying by “abstracting” from the soul and any kind of spirituality. But this is already
coming out from “school” into the life, into the action of conscious being, the evolutionary
phase, which he is in for it. In other words, time of mystics, when human cognition was based
predominantly on the intuition, has been finished in Ancient Greece of times of Socrates and
Plato, by initiating the age of Reason and time of reasonable and rational intellectual
cognition and education, now drawing to a close.
The end, naturally, may be experienced as a “catastrophic”, difficult, and “disastrous”
particularly if we regard it as the result of “mistake”, accomplished by not somebody! By Son
of God, or as a consequence of “human egoism”, according to the interpretation of Tibetan.
Since natural end is always new beginning, and in order to mankind would be able “to
cognize the end and don’t taste the death” in this dangerous transition time, it’s necessary to
combine love with deep believe in Christ with true understanding and recognition of the

8
Mission of Savior. The end of the age of the Reason coincides with unprecedented New
Beginning, anticipated by Great Transition into the age of mankind, recovering from its
century-old disruption and resurrecting in trinity of Mystics, Reason, and Will and first time
discovering Life in his cognition since times of Adam.
Man clears the way of return to lively life, to immortality, since until now he was
familiar only with mortal life. This is the way, leading to freedom and the becoming of son of
God, the way of returning to home Prodigal Son. However this Great Transition can take
place not earlier than it will be recognized in its foundations. First and the most important
question here is the education of human will, free will, crossing with Will of God, since slave,
entrusting his will to his master, can’t inherit Kingdom of Father.
Let’s listen what said eastern mystic about “will” and “freedom of will”, who
knowingly or due to the lack of education has distorted all meaning of Act of Christ.
“Main note of the future”, he pontificates, “is in the fact, that day will come, when
initial (one may assume pre-Christian, not yet distorted by work of Christ – I.H.) idea of God
and His primordial intent (known to Shambala, but carefully hidden from simple mortals –
I.H.) will not be depressed by human free will..” (B. p.35). Do you really want to listen more
about free will?
“The problem of free will caused always mental spasms in people.” (B*. p.382).
As we see, this eastern mystic first premises us to his false understanding of the
Mission of Christ, which because of its falsity couldn’t take place, as he thinks. Christ
“abandoned us, by leaving His work unfinished”, without establishing “age of love” and so
on; and because of the consequences instead of love on the planet happened complete
divisions, wars, and other inappropriate for “the age of love” events, as a result of which in
the end of second millenium from A.D. the planet has appeared in the state of global crisis,
then “Great White Brotherhood” (or the Shambala, as it gradually becomes clear from the talk
of Tibetan) has decided to get control of the fate of humanity, and give carefully lesson to
“Christ(?)” in order to prepare him for his “second advent”, holding His “job” under vigilant
control. The aim of educational activity of Tibetan is to pave the way for the new advent, but
whom? Christ or antichrist? In flesh? Who would this time correct His first failed attempt to
save the humanity as careless student. Further it becomes even more clear that Christ is not
Divine Personality, but just went out from “our midst” and that we shouldn’t make
“inappropriate emphasis of His divinity (emphasis never made by Him)” (B. p. 46). Here
Tibetan obviously relies on them, who never opened the Bible.
“I and My Father are one” (John, 10, 30).
“… The Father is in Me, and I in Him” (John, 10, 38).
“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me”
(John, 14, 6).
Finally, we can shortly formulate the activity of that eastern spiritual teacher, as
carefully hidden, irreconcilable, and mean war against Christ, since it conducted on behalf of
Christ.
“This time”, said this antichristian mystic, “Christ will not come alone. His colleagues
will accompany Him (from KGB or CIA? – I.H.). His and Their attempt will be opposite to
the previous one (i.e. attempt of Christ!), since now every eye will see Him, every ear will
hear and every mind will judge about him” (B. p.52).
Then why new Messiah is not in hurry to come? As it appears, there are two reasons.
First, because he needs “a period of extensive training for coming” under “control of different
authorities”, as “controlled in greatly smaller extent all human beings”. Second, “… it’s
extremely difficult to get money for the promulgation of leading ideas, such as, return of
Christ…”

9
 “Therefore the second prerequisite for everybody is to give as much as he can”
(B*p.135). May we imagine, how much money is needed to train “spiritual technique”, i.e.
magic, whole army of zombie like disciples for the new coming? What coming?
Unambiguously it’s coming of antichrist!
But what about disciple?
“Disciple is “who serves” (for all system from bottom to top - I.H.), and in the end
serves to One, and by sacrificing his personal “Self” for the sake of “Self” of the One, he
gives himself for the service to others in the service to the Plan” (B*.p.358). He entrusts his
will completely to “Acolytes of Plan”, the Plan should remain hidden from him, since “it’s
way more dangerous to know too much than too little” (B*.p.171). What concerns the
problem of “freedom of the will”, God forbid even think about it, do not cause “mental
spasms” of dear teacher.
Let’s finish analysis of the conception of spiritual education of Tibetan by his own
self-appraisal, since we belong to them, “who considers the statement of Tibetan as bait for
gullible and unsuspecting, who will carry on certain work by trying to warn people about this
deceit and help to open eyes to see what we think is trickery” (B.p.123).

III. CONCEPTION OF WEST SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL

EDUCATION
While Shambala is trying to “lead humanity out from imprisoning cave of
materialism… ”, this materialism, in the person of physics of torsion fields, is full of
optimism in the hope to overcome planetary crisis by own efforts.
Physics today is discovering God, as they say, on its own ways of development. This
is extremely curious process, deserving to be well investigated in this short study.
“As far back as in Veda”, said A.E. Akimov, “existence of some primary pre matter,
giving birth to All and where All returns had been stated. It must be said, that now this
postulate is getting quite meaningful understanding in modern scientific conception of
vacuum. In the vacuum are observed phenomena of self generation of the matter”, i.e. what
“physics is not able to explain yet” (A. p.8).
Author represents schematically “seven levels of reality”, where V level is vacuum,
from where elementary particles appear and plasma, forming atoms, molecules, and so on.
Author represents VI level as the level of field matter, not having any other physical
characteristics but torsion. These are primary torsion fields, fields of rotation, massless
vortices, bearing information, transmitted instantly.
“Structurally VI level is some giant three-dimensional hologram, filling whole
Universe” (A. p.13).
The VII level, or “Absolute Nothing” describes “boundless four-dimensional empty
space with pseudo Euclidean geometry, having zero torsion and curvature. Empty, but
numbered space assumes the existence of “primary consciousness”, which is able to recognize
“Absolute Nothing” and make it ordered. It’s possible, that “primary consciousness” plays
crucial role on that level of reality. It appears in the role of active source, God, defying
analytical description” (A.p.11). “The Absolute Nothing”, author continued, ”is the
environment, having … program, the matrix of the possible … Besides the presence of the
matrices, this level inevitably should possess by will and consciousness”. (A.p.11).

10
 SUBJECTIVE PHYSICS
ABSOLUTE NOTHING

PRIMARY VACUUM

VACUUM

OBJECTIVE PHYSICS
PLASMA
(ELEMENTARY PARTICLES)

GAS

LIQUID

SOLID STATE

Fig.1 Seven levels of reality (by A.E. Akimov).

What a bold assumption! And even though and God, and Will, and Consciousness,
defy “analytical description”, the fact itself, that physics is putting, more precisely, is doing
first attempt to put hypothesis of God in the foundations of its science may perceived as
shock of the foundations! Let’s remember Laplace with his system of the universe which
“didn’t need hypothesis of God.”
One may also remember Nikolay Kuzansky with his science of “scholar ignorance”.
Feeling, rationality, reason, God. One can ascend by footsteps from the feeling to the
rationality, from the rationality to the reason. But there is no transition from the reason to
God. This is field of scholar ignorance. Here it’s out of scope of our study to go into the
details of the philosophy of Kuzansky, but in order to clarify somehow his thought, let’s
remember above mentioned myth about killed and resurrected deity of life. Not only Reason,
this Typhon of ancient myth, but even goddess of wisdom Isida herself is not able to raise

11
from dead deity of life Osiris, since Truth, Life, and God can be cognized, by gathering them
by parts, but to know is impossible. These realities of spiritual world have to be found outside
“the school”, since it’s not a knowledge about life, but the Life itself.
However physics of torsion fields, being in the phase of fabulous discoveries,
naturally can’t immediately go deep into its philosophical and spiritual foundations. Here we
are interested namely in foundations, and hence, boundaries of nature science and spiritual
science, more precisely, the possibility to eliminate the abyss between them. Nature science
builds up bridge into the spiritual world, but foundations of the bridge as a whole lean on the
basis of exact science, and that bridge hovers above abyss, without reaching another bank.
In the middle of last century Erwin Schroedinger in his book “what’s a life in the point
of a physicist” asked the following question: Whether it’s sufficient of existing laws of
physics to describe the phenomenon of life, or we need new kind of so called “unphysical”
law?
Opinions have divided into the three groups from the very beginning (7). First group
considered existing laws as enough for the description of life. The second group regarded
them evidently not enough, and quite possible that there are other laws acting in the world and
allowing to understand that phenomenon. The third group of opinions is presented by the
statement of Leon Brillouen: There is no way to understand the phenomenon of life without
resorting to “the vital origin”. Our laws of thermodynamics, especially the Second, belong to
the dead, inertial objects; life doesn’t obey to this law, and new “vital origin” had to able to
reveal the conditions. Owing to these conditions life contradicts to the Second law of
thermodynamics’ (7).
As they say, much water has flowed under the bridge since then, although this
question never got finally answered. Physicists almost forgot about that information first
time entered into the system of physical knowledge as “entropy taken with negative sign”,
“which is the measure of ordering itself”, as Schroedinger stated (7). This negative entropy
was called negentropy, measure of order, or information. In other words, information has
entered in physics as negation of entropy, negation of chaos, as pure dull structure, pure form
of knowledge, dismembered now to “two bits”.
Conceptions of A.E. Akimov, G.I. Shipov and others allow to refer their position to
the second group. As they think, before the creation of the theory of vacuum and torsion
fields, existing laws of physics were not sufficient for the explanation of the phenomenon of
life. But after the contours of Unified Field Theory became visible, such a possibility
appeared. And they will be right that discovery of so called “fifth interaction” allows to come
way closer to this problem than it does traditional physics. Namely, after the discovery of
seven levels of physical reality, hypothesis of Consciousness, Will, and God got access into
the world of exact science. It’s natural to introduce another hypothesis, that primary and
fundamental principle is life, not a death.
Such is the position of A.E. Akimov, when in the second chapter, titled “Seven Veda
levels of the universe and the theory of physical vacuum” he begins with consideration of
physical picture of reality from the VII level, “Absolute Nothing”. In other words, he starts
from the level of “primary consciousness”, or hypothesis of God, and then goes down along
the scheme down to I level “the solid state” and considers as a primary “Consciousness”, but
not “the solid state”, or the dense matter; i.e. author follows the way, accepted in spiritual
science without particular thinking about permissibility of such advancement in the system of
physical knowledge. In the meantime, the science is advancing by return from bottom to top,
from the abstraction of “solid state” to the hypothesis of God, both historically and logically.
Let’s remember, that science of New Age has began from the law of inertia, or the postulate
about “lifeless” matter, and now it raises the problem of the transition from “lifeless” to
“lively”. Here author shifts accents, starting from God, Who is life, and finishing this descent

12
by “lifeless”, or “the solid state”, object of study of science about “lifeless” nature. However,
author does it not quite wittingly, because further he runs into another extreme, by trying to
erase the difference between “lively” and “lifeless”.
“The idea of bio-field has strongly entered into our life”, he wrote, ”Since physics
today has not only clear scientific understanding, but complete experimental confirmation;
that all physical fields are getting their origin from elementary particles, and since both lively
and lifeless world are build up from the same atoms and molecules, then the existence of such
field which is present in lively matter and absent in lifeless isn’t possible, and vice versa”.
(A.p.23).
We had already occasion to discuss the question about “lively” and “lifeless” nature in
connection with laws of physics. Here is the same disagreement with “lively” and “lifeless”
matter, and it comes down to evident contradiction. Because if both organic and inorganic
worlds consist of the same atoms and molecules, then what kind of fundamental difference
between lively organism and “piece of rock” we can talk about. Or atoms and molecules are
dead in one case, and in other one they revive miraculously? Isn’t it not clear. That it’s time to
overcome this stubborn scientific prejudice about “lifeless” nature and “lifeless” matter.
Namely this identification of lively nature with scientific abstraction of “lifeless”
nature, allows author to assert, that molecules and fields of organic nature are the same as for
inorganic one. However there is sufficiently accurate demarcation line, established since XIX
age by Louis Paster (8). Paster discovered optical activity on the molecular level, distinctive
feature of only molecules of living organism. This property of living organic molecules to
rotate polarization plane of circularly polarized light to the right or to the left allows to mark
an accurate boundary between the chemistry of living organic and inorganic nature. Outside
of organism these molecules lose with time their thermodynamically non-equilibrium state,
lose optical activity, i.e. the quantity of right-rotating and left-rotating molecules goes to the
equilibrium, the solution racemizes and goes to the thermodynamic equilibrium.
“Stable thermodynamic non-equilibrium” (E. Bauer) (9) is the state, which makes the
difference between molecules of living organism from molecules of inorganic nature. (Let’s
note in parentheses that state of non-equilibrium is forbidden by the second law of
thermodynamics, and the theories of self-organization, (see concept of Ilia Prigogin and
others) start from exposure of that contradiction).
The state of asymmetric purity is the first necessary condition of vital functions of the
organism, and by losing it, organism falls sick and dies. Thus biosphere distinctly differs from
inorganic nature by asymmetric purity. It also differs by the attraction of unidirectional bio-
torsion fields, unlike electromagnetic spin-torsion fields. Torsion fields radiated by biosphere
still wait their investigators. And these studies, fraught by unprecedented cognitive surprises,
may become corner stone, laid in the basement of the bridge, which is now erected from the
side of the nature science in the direction of spiritual world. Here we are just talking about
bio-torsion fields, comprehensible for modern rough-material physical and chemical study.
What concerns bio-fields of such a being of biosphere as man, we’ll be able to talk about it
not earlier than difference between living man and its scientific model will become obvious.
By the way, the same accurate demarcation line may be drawn and on the level of
elementary particles. Our universe consists of matter, but not antimatter, and one can find
antiparticles here as rarely as, let’s say, right-rotating amino acids in the world of organic
nature.
Today, when physics is discovering God on its own ways of original development and
pretending to explain such concepts as Consciousness and Will, by forgetting that, the
problem of life itself for physics is a deep dark secret, necessity appears to return to own
origins and to begin with recognition of own foundations and boundaries, set by these
foundations. And only after that it will become clear, that laws of physics from the very

13
beginning, i.e. in their classical part (since in modern one they are localized in definite limits)
have a mission to describe nature so to say, by cinematographic method, as if fixing instantly
video taped lifeless pictures, which are used then for assembling and integration of the
physical “picture of the world” as soulless monument, as lifeless model of living nature.
Actually inorganic nature, established on the planet today, is an artificial world of
machines and mechanisms, created by man on the basis of physical laws, what he calls “laws
of nature”, because of his lack of knowledge of foundations. In fact, these laws fixing only
one, lifeless face of the nature and growing technical power beyond all measure, not only
don’t assist in the formation of a man as living, animated and spiritual being, but make a dead
model from him, having artificial intellect as ideal of mental faculties. The man is gradually
becoming a miserable appendage of that “lifeless” artificial world, made by him, and where
his role is weak-willed presser of buttons.
Man should still recognize, that he is what he is doing. And today he is killing
everything, h touches by his rationality and reason, by making “the model” from living man,
and turning living nature into dead desert of machines. And it’s natural after all that in the age
of Reason he is just growing to the cognition of inorganic, mineral nature, and foundations of
science prevent him to go further. He doesn’t investigate these foundations in accordance with
specific character of mathematical nature science, having Knowledge-Power in his
competence, and consciousness is carried out in radically different dimension of philosophy,
which can investigate the concept of consciousness in isolation from the knowledge.
Thus, first what lies ahead of science is to discover that life, organic life is forgotten
problem.
The second is to look into the abyss between the poles of the natural science and
spiritual science and recognize the measure of his “scholar ignorance”.
The third, finally is to understand that this abyss, artificially created by his reason, in
fact is the problem of life, stretched between the poles of Spirit and Matter, and the process
of its resolution is the evolutionary way of Great Transition into new dimension of
Consciousness from the “school” into the life. Since the alternative to this natural
evolutionary transition is death, but not theoretical, and not scientific-cognitive, but the very
real apocalyptic.
By putting sign of equality between “living” and “lifeless” nature, authors of the
theory of torsion fields go on further to the “consciousness”.
“At consideration of the nature of consciousness through the specific manifestations of
torsion fields, material objects, it becomes clear that consciousness itself is a special form of
the field (torsion) matter” (10).
Thus, everything is matter, including and consciousness. In the old good times of
“marxist-leninist materialism” Matter and Consciousness were considered as two polarized
poles and “main question of philosophy” was the choice and priority: what at first, what is
here primary and what is secondary. It’s clear that matter was considered as primary. Now
only matter is matter, but consciousness is matter too… and nothing more. So unprecedented
and awful triumph of materialism. Opposite bank of spiritual science is completely ruined and
devastated. Therefore and abyss is eliminated. There isn’t left neither God, nor consciousness,
nor will. All these realities of spiritual world appeared in the power of natural science. And
though in the beginning of investigation authors were noting difficulties, connected with the
possibilities of “analytical description”, however in the end all difficulties have appeared been
overcame.
“The usage of the term “self-generation” (it’s a question of generation in vacuum
electron-positron pairs and others - I.H.) indicates on the presence of processes, which physics
still (italicized by me – I.H.)” can’t explain” (A.p.8).
Then why! Yesterday it couldn’t, but today it turned out that it can.

14
 “Probably,” let’s cite author one more time, “on this level of reality (“Absolute
Nothing” – I.H.) ”primary consciousness” plays key meaning appeared in the role of active
origin, God, and defying analytical description” (my italics – I.H.).
Who said? “Consciousness is special form of field matter” (A.p.12), what we read,
“i.e. as it turned out, can be excellently analytically described.” The impression is produced,
that it’s left so little for full and final victory of materialism over the opponent, just to find
special “field form of the matter” for “love”, “faith”, and “hope”…, what else left there?
And to express all that on exact language of mathematical formulas. Striking lack of foresight,
when behind the trees of epochal discoveries, and the discovery of torsion fields and
recognition of the possibilities of physical vacuum is namely like that, they stopped to note
infinite poverty of pure dull form. None of formulas, describing the geometry or physics of
torsion field of consciousness will not make conscious their authors, i.e. aware of foundations
of his science about “lifeless” nature and limits of their possibilities, i.e. will not make them
responsible for the actions, having opened possibilities in the front of them. It’s sufficient to
remember that financing of the investigations of the torsion fields became possible only
because of unprecedented great advance in defense technologies.
“Torsion fields found first application in the military science. In eighties doctor of
phys.-math. Sciences A.E. Akimov has invented the spin-torsion generator, weapon way more
dangerous, than nuclear one. It’s started grandiose deployment of torsion technologies in the
military industry.” (11). It’s sufficient to imagine the strength of the influence of giant “ray
gun” having a power of thousand times greater than atomic bomb and able to destroy inter-
continental rockets. But what’s immeasurably more dangerous is the potential of use of
torsion weapon in peace time, since microwave radiation, purposefully sent from the satellites
to certain regions, is able to wreck their population, by unnoticeably acting on psyche and
health of people, making them go depression, making them zombie… This is monstrous
“psychotropic cudgel” in so called piece time, since “peace time” there will not be anymore if
such a weapon will be in hands of forces, tending to the domination on the planet. With the
discovery of torsion fields and the applications of torsion technologies humanity has entered
in qualitatively new age of military technique, when it became possible to make a mass
destruction of not only body of man, but his soul too.
But really is this “technological” result of the development of science about
“inorganic” nature so unexpected? Whether we should be so surprised, that with growing of
power of technique reasonable man himself is becoming more and more fragmented, “lifeless
and miserable”? As if released outside his own strength captured him and dictates him its
conditions of the existence. Gradual unnoticeable process, since the more educated in his
natural science, the more unhealthy and helpless by body and soul, called (what do you
think?) “energy-information package”. Have you idea how he calls his brain? You’ll never
guess! It’s a “biological computer of consciousness (BCC)”. It’s clear, Universe is computer
too, but “giant”.
As a result of his “achievements” in the study and artificial creation of “lifeless”
nature, man reasonable already led the planet to the threshold of the apocalypse, when nature
can’t stand such test of its essence, and man himself came up to such an extent of upset, when
he can’t live without devices, regulating from outside the mood of his soul, pardon me,
“energy-informational package”, without “harmonization of his bio-field”, without
“protection of bio-field from field information distortions” and different kinds of “field
poisoning”, and also without “ecological readjustment“ of the “field space in vicinity of man,
information-energetic and chemical cleaning of food and all properties without exclusion and
means of everyday life support, including money, clothe, medicine…, cosmetics, detergents
and so on” (A.p.72)

15
 Half a century ago Sri Aurobindo said about man, originally talented by abilities,
which he nurtures outside in the form of technique, such an artificial shoring or “crutches”, he
get so used to it with time, that he can’t live without these “crutches”. Today we can talk
about “invalid wheel chair”, he stuck tightly together with, so there is no need to spend extra
money in order to make him zombie from satellites. Making of zombies goes gradually along
with scientific technical progress.
The science, which in New time started from the postulate about inertial motion, now
threatens already to turn man himself into “the inertial system”, who thoroughly forgot that he
is what he is doing. “This inertial system keeps its state of rest or uniform rectilinear motion
until it will not be pushed by the force from the outside”. Alack, as we see, the definition of
inertial system and “zombie” basically coincide. Perhaps it’s left only to make q quotation
from “the Resume of the author, full of optimism”.
“The creation of new scientific paradigm, theory of physical vacuum and as a
consequence the construction of torsion technologies excludes apocalyptic scenario for the
Earth civilization” (A.p.58). Because “torsion technologies allow to find an exit from all dead
ends of technocratic development of the civilization in XX century” (A.p.57).
Indeed, torsion technologies can promise solution of all problems, connected with the
survival of the humanity, except the most central dead end the problem of man.
Who is he, this man reasonable, long time ago exceeded commissions of his reason
and rationality and appeared outside of their boundaries in the dark unconscious phase of
human foolishness? Who’s that man? Is he wreath of Nature and potential son of God or
soulless and spiritless machine, who became like that assembled from “two bits” lifeless
world, he created by his rationality and reason?

IV. FORGOTTEN PROBLEM OF LIFE AS THE BRIDGE BETWEEN

EAST AND WEST
So, we have considered in the main two systems of education, more precisely, two
sufficiently typical examples of modern education, eastern and western. One of the systems
lead disciple to the previous pre-Christian, as we were certain, antichrist spiritual technique,
or spiritual science; another one into the future apocalypse, fraught with not only the
destruction of its physical body, but what’s way more terrible, corruption of his soul on the
ways of natural science. Both systems purposefully turn man into “zombie”. One for the
service to Spiritual Hierarchy on behalf of Shambala, another one for the maintenance of
lifeless world of machines, and computers, in electronic webs he got so thoroughly entangled,
that he can’t distinguish his own living soul from “the energetic informational package”, and
his brain from “the biological computer of consciousness-BCC”! One system is trying to
reduce consciousness to the matter, another one, not being indebted, cut off not only “body”
as something “secondary”, and minor, and moreover preventing human evolutionary
development, materialistic science, but its subject, physical body too, by declaring “the
surgical work” of “the Destroyer” as necessary and beneficial, taking place in the name of
salvation of humanity and for better future. And against this background eastern spiritual
teacher develops leading ideas about “the synthesis of cultures of East and West”, although
it’s clear, that he has on his mind persuasion of the audience in only truth of namely eastern
spiritual education.
“To answer… the question about the type of experience, able to help a kid to complete
his development and supplementing mandatory state course of education is almost impossible,
because of huge differences between people and practical impossibility to find teachers,
working as one soul and mind” (B.p.24).

16
 As we see, it’s really impossible, and not so much because of differences between
people and deficit of teachers, as because of existence of abyss between state course of
education and that spiritual course, proposed by Tibetan. And student, getting western
scientific technical education and trying to “supplement” it with eastern spiritual education is
appearing in inevitable situation, since these two poles are in tough uncompromising
opposition and there are no means of communication between them. And if jumps above the
abyss from one bank to another and back, accompanied by lose of consciousness, will not
exhaust finally strengths of disciple, since both methods of education contradict to each other
radically, then he, stood such educational test, will start thinking about necessity of a raising
of the bridge.
Humanity is moving namely in this direction in its cognition, although not always
realizing it. Natural science in the person of physics is anxious for unified description of the
nature and through “Grand Unification” and theory of vacuum is trying to come up to
“Superunification”. And spiritual science in the person of “Antakhkarana” aims for example
at development of common thread of consciousness in disciple, unifying his spiritual centers.
However at doing that both sides are trying to approve in every way its independence and all-
sufficiency, by sacrificing soul of man and nature in the case of natural science, and his flesh
in the case of spiritual science. As we see, both approaches are diametrically opposite, but the
result is the same.
Man, this spirit in flesh, is dead in his cognition, since on one pole he is pure “lifeless”
matter, on another one is pure fleshless spirit. It becomes clear that there is not abyss between
them, but the problem. This is problem of life, stretched, crucified between poles of Spirit
and Matter, problem forgotten for the time being (2).
The problem of organic life equally was avoided by both spiritual and natural science,
as if testing the strength of man’s spirit and flesh as long as he will guess about the waning of
his cognition both spiritual, and materialistic, and he will understand finally that he is mortal
in his cognition, dead and he can revive only by standing on the way of solution of the
problem of life. Since it’s impossible to stay alive, being dead in cognition, and exist in living
nature, replacing it by dead world of machines, not realizing own actions and being
responsible for the consequences.
Modern physics is already on this way. Synergetic concepts and theories of self-
organization closely approached to the recognition of current situation, raising a problem of
transition from “lifeless” to “living”, and theories of vacuum and torsion fields, by jumping
through the problem of life, as if it doesn’t exist, are dealing with the problem of
“consciousness” and “God”.
Forgotten in cognition problem of life still lies ahead. Today it’s extremely important
fact, that physics can’t do without hypothesis of God as “primary cognition” in his
construction of physical picture of the world.
Deity of life of ancient myths is appearing to physics as the object of cognition, as
killed, dismembered by double-edged sword of Reason-Typhon, deity, cognizable by parts,
particles, elements…
It’s worth thinking about essence of raised by physics problem of transition from
“lifeless” to “living”. Whether it’s not physical aspect of rising from dead? Let’s think about
it, whether physics asks question about the possibility to resurrect dead body of the world, by
investigation of which it was busy since Galilean and Newton? Because by raising the
problem of transition from dead to living, Physics, not especially realizing it, is appearing
directly in the focus of spiritual knowledge.
The problem of life is resolved in spiritual world by the Mystery of Calvary. However
it’s not a science, not a philosophy, and not Holy Writ, but Act of Christ. In the age of
Reason Christ came in human flesh to die on the cross by Crucifixion, in order to reveal a

17
man of Old Testament man, this slave of God, the way to resurrection. This is the way to
freedom and to the becoming a son of God, who is already recognized in cognition, as
changing of times, as Great Transition from the age of Reason to the new age of
Consciousness.
Every step of the Savior presents us symbol, allowing to see as in mirror and
understand the meaning of human evolutionary development, whereas this meaning is
escaping our attention and losing without comprehension of the Act of Christ. Immortal God
came for unprecedented Sacrifice, for the cognition of death of physical body, in order to
open humanity, more and more sinking into “the dark abyss of the matter”, the way to the
Life. Since the Fall of Adam, humanity more and more was sinking into the cognition of
death. But the aim of going away of Prodigal Son from the spiritual world, is not cognition of
death, but “to open dead end, having just one, underground exit to the light” (T. Mann)
through the sinking into the dense layers of the matter, to open Great Transition to the life
and recognize the fact of being son of God and already by own conscious volitional effort to
appear on the way of return into the future spirituality.
There is no return to the past spirituality, as teachers of eastern spiritual techniques
struggle, since it’s escape, for the sake of which we are forced to sacrifice by the most
valuable gift of inheritance of the Father, by the freedom of will. And if we’ll loose this gift,
by replacing it with the mess of pottage of mechanical comfort, or with “the exodus”,
promised by Tibetan, Adam’s generation will lose the right to inherit the Kingdom of Father.
So the attempts to bring back humanity into the passed pre-Christian spirituality are in
essence, antichristian activity, or sort of the war against Christ, waged today on all levels,
from subtle-spiritual to the rough-material.
Meanwhile, the possibility is opening with the development of the cognition not only
to believe in Jesus Christ, but also comprehend, and realize the fact, that “the eye of a
needle” of transition into the new dimension, into the Kingdom of Life, discovered by Savior,
is the only way to salvation. The alternative to this Great Transition is further “free fall: and
sinking into the hell, dark kingdom of death.
“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to
destruction, and there are many who go in by it” (Matt.,7,13-14).
The problem of life appears in cognition as not filling place point, or axis, in other
projection, from where human cognition is starting and where it’s returning by finishing its
way. Life is that mystery center of the cognitive universe, bundling in horizontal projection
all now separated fields of cognition, and vertically is hierarchical axis, which connects
spiritual world with material one by intersecting with horizontal plane. In inorganic nature
this point of the intersection is Light, in organic is Life, in human is Spirit, in divine nature is
called by Holy Spirit (2).
We see the light of the symbol of the Cross on this intersection of vertical axis with
horizontal one, and the symbol of Crucified Christ on it. Humanity has outlived two
milleniums of worship to the Symbol of Crucified and killed God, in order to conjecture
finally that man himself is crucified in his cognition between poles of Spirit and Matter, and
that the deepest meaning of the symbol of Crucifixion is not in death (cross is ancient symbol
of life), lasting just two days, or two milleniums, but in Resurrection.
But mankind will be able to be healed from own century-old fragmentation only when
it will grow to such level of consciousness to come down from cross of cognitive dedicatory
death, by connecting his free will with the Will of God, and hence, by perceiving the
Impulse of Christ.
Christ came in the flesh. First time in history of humanity God dressed into the mortal
human flesh and came as Son of Man and Son of God. He came as Perfect Man and Perfect
God, without sin, “unfragmented”, “eternal”, i.e. differing from “the man, dismembered in his

18
basis from the beginning radically” (12). And we should examine with utmost clarity why
Christ is not a magician and why He is not a man, not “One of us”, as Tibetan talks about it.
Magician is the man, acting either in spiritual pretersensual world, having deal with
spiritual technique, or in the physical world, calling his science by natural science. And both
can’t even imagine what does it mean to be “unbroken, eternal” Word of God, Logos,
incarnated with the purpose to open the way for the humanity, on which mortal, sinful human
flesh is becoming Word, spiritualized. Magic is only “school” of life, when by practicing
spiritual or physical, magician can declare in proud self-conceit that he is possessing by some
secrets and he is able to work wonders, i.e. he became skilled in “theoretical mechanics” of
the spirit; natural scientist can declare, that he is possessing by “theoretical mechanics” of the
body of nature, respectively. Philosophy in the person of Hegel, for example, proudly
announces, that it gives knowledge about what is truth and life, without noticing that concepts
or ideas of life and truth are far from life as heaven is far from he earth. May you imagine
Christ, Who would say, that He knows, what’s truth and life? Nonsense, isn’t it?
I am the way, and the truth, and the life.
Since Son of God, who became flesh doesn’t separate knowledge from the doing; His
Word, Logos is not human word and logic in essence, but Word-Creation. It’s clearly
reflected in Armenian translation of the Bible, called not a Holy Writ, but God’s Breath, in
one word “Astvatsashuntsch”; and the Gospel of John is started by words: “In the beginning
was the Word-Doing”, “I skzbane bunner”, and not simply Word, which can be easily mixed
up with human word, now dispersed to “two bits”.
The process of human salvation from “the depravity”, fragmentation, mortality is
started namely from the cognition and education, since man reasonable acts first by head, and
then by other parts of his body. In the present technocratic age he is not even allowed in his
actions to be guided be heart, since he lives in the age of despotic and vampiric Reason,
dismembered the world, man and God. But the mission of pure Reason is approaching to its
end, and it should be finished not by the victory of the kingdom of death, but by the transition
into new dimension, where feeling, reason, and will start beat in one rhythm of lively life.
How then should be the education in new age of Resurrected Christ and humanity
recovering in cognition? What should be studied first, sciences about spirit or sciences about
the nature? Such question was appropriate in the age of divisions and choice, opposition and
wars, when opposite poles were divided by the abyss. Today, when human thought is
discovering the focus of all cognitive world as the problem of life, when all fields of human
cognition intersect in one foundation of Life, we should start from the whole, but not separate
parts. Not only the method of teaching and pedagogics are changing, but all system of
education.

To be continued.

19
 REFERENCES

1. The apocrypha of ancient Christian. M., 252 1969 (translated into Russian).
2. I.D. Hakobian, The problem of commensurability of science and philosophy or the
Mystery of Life, Death and Resurrection in the cognition, “Noyan Tapan”, Yerevan 2001
(in Russian).
3. A.A. Bailey, Education in the New Age, “Litan”, M., 1998 (translated into Russian).
(B.p.x)
4. A.E. Akimov, Character of Physics and technologies in the beginning of XXI century:
The presentation on scientific pedagogical Conference “The Ideas of Lively Ethics and the
Secret Doctrine in modern science and practical pedagogics”. Ekaterinburg, 1999. (A.p.x).
5. A.A. Beili, New apparition of Christ, “Eddar”, M., 1998 (translated into Russian).
(B*.p.x).
6. (1, p.252) Compare with the Drunvalo Melchizedek, The Ancient Secret of the Flower of
Life, V.2 2001 (when he talks about first act of creation).
7. I.D. Hakobian, Philosophical foundations of the unity of biological and physical
knowledge, Yerevan, p.15-40 1987.
8. (Ibid, p.11-15), see also I.D. Hakobian, Symmetry and Asymmetry in cognition, p.84-85
1980.
9. (Ibid, p.100-104).
10. A.E. Akimov, G.I. Shipov, The Consciousness, physics of torsion fields and the torsion
technologies// Consciousness and physical reality. V.1 #1-2, p.66-67 1996.
11. V.Yu. Tikhoplav, T.S. Tikhoplav, The physics of faith, “Wes”, S. Petersburg, p.129
12. (1.p.275).

20