Electoral (PET) in a reso-
the
ff#"j;t"e-Jrrfv z-, zbig' las
:::::;;;-l r,.oi n:Iryd:-*Fg
nl,r.--d.' qskinc the court to resolve
-"ti"o
t#'iJJdriitf.{tfi
"r -n""t"*"nta$-#'.*--h::P
ilT#"i"Sr-aPtoi-i""a''4.a.'Bongbon!"ry::-^J:;
due
An official copy of the
PFT rpsolution received bv
Marco6' camp states,".,.tha
Tribunal has yet to complete
the proceedrngs following
Ruleb5 of the 2010 PFf Ruhs,
which qtail iudicial Ecotmt,
revision and appreciation of
the votes cast in the
orotestanfs oilot Drovinc€s.
the figures' subilitted by
orot€stee are merelv
ipeculative. In arriving at tf'6
fi sur€s. Drotestee Dresumes
tr'%t wi be
ai her claiml
admitted by the Tribrmal.
This riremise is
fi'nriammr;llv flawed as *rc
Tribural G stil in t]le orocess
of aooreciation of *re'nrvised
balfoi and rulurg on the
respective obiecb-ons and
dairns made by the parties
j-unked the urge,rt
!!!!t+Efi-.::::
tlEreorr The Triblmal's final and r€-aoDr€ciation of ballots 'comDutations', "ln inDges foom Camarines StlI.
tallv of votes after recormt Irorn *dthree pijot prcvirrces omtdtee's Motion, she praw It also asked the Comelec
and appr€ciation has yet to .hl}m ttv the foimer senator ihar rhe Tribunal immedatelv and the Board of Election
tp coririleted and released." Marcos, ;he gained as much resolve all pending iraidanG IisDectorsof several dusbered
"I r'ri are verv pleased with as 1t000 votes. after tlre revision and r€count DftiinctsftornCamarin€sSur
this delelooftiril The PET 'Robr€do should rcsDect of the ballots. Protestee ind lloilo to explain the
has fiialli put an end to the rul€s spt bv the PET'and Dr€sented her own abE€nce of ballot images inr
R.'l'Hio's'hna.ious daim of r€f rainf rorrengaging inmind- l'omnutation of lhe total theh iuisdictions.
victory desDite the fact tllat conrlifion tar{ic.s. The PET natioi'lal votes ior Drobstant Tl-ie resolution also
the oriire aiocees had not ya has exDlained o Bth sidd ,nd Drotestee affer "after deferred action on Marcos'
conduded. She should stop rhat "ie.overv" in Drot€,st revision, recount, and re- urgent motjon calling for the
misleading the public with linso meani thai the appreciaton," claiming that teahnical examination of
her impetuous proiestant Marcos) is able ho Gi victory as Vice Prcsidert election docwnerits ftom the
Dronouncements, we ale ;Iove that his Drobest has has t e€n ionfmed. Li ef{ecl, omvinces of Larao del Sw,
?Y'nfident Etatii *le €nd. itwil inedts to push thiough based what Drotesiee seeks is the basilan, and Masuindanao
beformers€natorMato6who on the iooreciadoi of the irnmeaiate rcsolution of tlle oendins the condision of the
wilbe proclaimed," said Atty. Trilnmal ttisnnlvtheTnlbunal irlstant orotest, Protestee's 'aooreciltion of balloe. "The
\4c Rcilriguez, spol<espersc,n who will decidri whe*rer the motion' is like ise t'rllunal believes. ard so
ol brmer strlatm lefchanct Drotest witl Droceed and the Dremature." holds, the protestant's
Songbon{ Marcc, F. ;erdict w l be based on the ' The sme recoluti.rn also mrrtions with rcsoect to the
Gr]une 11, 2019, Robredo r€sulls of the aopreoation dir€cd tlle Cornmission on conduct of ' technical
tfuough her legal counsel stage where rdv'ised ard Election {Comel€c) to submit examinationonhGthirdcaus€
Attv. -Romulo }Iacalhtal recounted ballots are a comment to Marcos' of action-are Premature
souiht the immediate leviewed," added Atty. consolidated reply because the proceectrngs
reso'lution of the election Rodrisuez. ouestionine the non- under Rule 65 of the 2010
Drotest. She daimed that Th; rpcent PET Gsolution drcnoloeicn sequ€ncine of PET Rules have not vet
based on tlrerevisiqr, recount also took notic€ of Robredo s ballotim&esandExcessbinot crdcluded...," it said.
P..*<e 1