1. That the plaintiff is the son of spouses Francisca De vera Arenas and Domingo Arenas.

Admitted

2. That Francisca De Vera and Severa De Vera are sisters. And that the plaintiff Marcelo De Vera
is the son of Francisca De Vera.

Admitted

3. That Severa has seven children.

Admitted

4. That the children of Apolonio are the defendants and the defendants are nephews
and nieces of Marcelo De Vera.

Admitted

5. That Apolonio and the defendants received Php 22,000.00 each from the plaintiff with the
qualification that it only covers the cost for the transfer of the houses.

Denied… Minda Delfin did not received any money. Apolonio Tugade received the money
because he is afraid. Tinakot siya na wala silang lupa at mas maigi na kunin ang pera at umalis
sila doon sa lugar na walang kasiguraduhan kung sa kanila talaga iyon. See attached police blotter.
Ang katotohanan ay wala pang naisagawang subdivision ang lupa. At walang dokumentong
magpapatunay na ang northern portion ng lupa ay kay francisca de vera. Ni minsan ay di tumira
tumira si francisca at ang kanyang mga anak sa pinagaagawang lupa. Si Severa De Vera at
ang kanyang anak nasi Apolonio ang tumira sa nasabing lupa.

6. That Apolonio Tugade removed his house which used to seat on the northern portion
belonging to francisca and transferred to southern part with the qualification that the transfer
was if proven that the same belongs to Francisca.

Denied… Apolonio remove his house not voluntarily. He was afraid at that time. Francisca did
not owned the northern portion. Severa abd Francisca owned the land. And the land was not
yet subdivided. The land is not only 1 (one) parcel of land. The area must be subdivided well
equal in share between Severa and Francisca. AGAIN, THE LAND IS NOT YET SUBDIVIDED.

7. That Apolonio is now occupying an 800 plus square meter portion on the southern part
belonging to Severa.

Denied… Apolonio's House occupied not more than 100 sq.m. Iyong lupa na kung saan.
nakatirik ang bahay na pinaglipatan ay hindi sakop ng southern portion Sabihin na nating
kay francisca ang northern portion, ang bay kunag saan nakatirik ang lupa ni Apolonio ay sakop
pa rin ng northern portion. Muli, wala pang subdivision ang lupa. Kailangang makuha ang
 buong sukat ng lupa na pagmamay-ari ng magakapatid at saka doon hatiin ang lupa equally
at pagkasunduan nila kung sino ang nasa hilaga o timog. Kung pagbabasehan ninyo ang MOA
Memorandum of Agrreement na kung saan ay tinakot nila si Apolonio ay nagsasabi na walang
lupa si Apolonio kaya sila pinaalis doon. At magapasalamt pa raw sila dahil may lilipatan sila.

8. That the defendants did not follow their father and stand remained in the northern portion.

Admitted… Matagal nang nakatira sila Apolonio at ang kanyang mga anak at ang kanyang
mga apo. May halaga na ang bawat bahay na nakatayo doon. At bigla silang paaalisin doon
ng wala namang karapatang magpaalis. Tinakot nila ang matanda dahil sa wala siyang hawak
na mga dokumento. Ang mga titulo at dokumento ay hawak ng mga Pamilya Gomez kung
saan siila ang tuwirang nagmamayari ng lupa. Si Crucia Galsim na ina ni Severa at Francisca ay
second wife ni Rufino Gomez.

9. That during the ocular inspection conducted by tha DAR, the defendants admitted that their
father is now occupying a lot with an area of 800 plus square meters located in the southern
portion, belonging to Severa.

Denied… Ang bahay ni Apolonio na ama ng mga defendants ay hindi hihigit sa 100 sq.m. At ito
ay hindi sakop ng southern portion. The defendants did not admit that their father occupied
800 sq.m. Ang totoo ay sinasaka nila ang buong lupain doon maliban lamang sa mga
napagtayuan ng mga bahay ng mga defendants.

ll. TRUE ISSUES

1. The plaintiff do not have the right to eject the defendants from the disputed lots.
2. The plaintiff is not entitled to damages and attorney's fees.
3. The Honorable Court has jurisdiction with enough evidence.

Dapat diyan pinaguusapan muna. Ano ang buong sukat ng lupa na dapat ay paghatian
ng magkapatid na Severa at Francisca.
1. That the plaintiff is the son of spouses Francisca De vera Arenas and Domingo Arenas.

Admitted

2. That Francisca De Vera and Severa De Vera are sisters. And that the plaintiff Marcelo De Vera
is the son of Francisca De Vera.

Admitted

3. That Severa has seven children.

Admitted

4. That the children of Apolonio are the defendants and the defendants are nephews
and nieces of Marcelo De Vera.

Admitted

5. That Apolonio and the defendants received Php 22,000.00 each from the plaintiff with the
qualification that it only covers the cost for the transfer of the houses.

Denied… Minda Delfin did not received any money. Apolonio Tugade received the money
because he is afraid. Tinakot siya na wala silang lupa at mas maigi na kunin ang pera at umalis
sila doon sa lugar na walang kasiguraduhan kung sa kanila talaga iyon. See attached police blotter.
Ang katotohanan ay wala pang naisagawang subdivision ang lupa. At walang dokumentong
magpapatunay na ang northern portion ng lupa ay kay francisca de vera. Ni minsan ay di tumira
tumira si francisca at ang kanyang mga anak sa pinagaagawang lupa. Si Severa De Vera at
ang kanyang anak nasi Apolonio ang tumira sa nasabing lupa.

6. That Apolonio Tugade removed his house which used to seat on the northern portion
belonging to francisca and transferred to southern part with the qualification that the transfer
was if proven that the same belongs to Francisca.

Denied… Apolonio remove his house not voluntarily. He was afraid at that time. Francisca did
not owned the northern portion. Severa abd Francisca owned the land. And the land was not
yet subdivided. The land is not only 1 (one) parcel of land. The area must be subdivided well
equal in share between Severa and Francisca. AGAIN, THE LAND IS NOT YET SUBDIVIDED.

7. That Apolonio is now occupying an 800 plus square meter portion on the southern part
belonging to Severa.

Denied… Apolonio's House occupied not more than 100 sq.m. Iyong lupa na kung saan.
nakatirik ang bahay na pinaglipatan ay hindi sakop ng southern portion Sabihin na nating
kay francisca ang northern portion, ang bay kunag saan nakatirik ang lupa ni Apolonio ay sakop
pa rin ng northern portion. Muli, wala pang subdivision ang lupa. Kailangang makuha ang
 buong sukat ng lupa na pagmamay-ari ng magakapatid at saka doon hatiin ang lupa equally
at pagkasunduan nila kung sino ang nasa hilaga o timog. Kung pagbabasehan ninyo ang MOA
Memorandum of Agrreement na kung saan ay tinakot nila si Apolonio ay nagsasabi na walang
lupa si Apolonio kaya sila pinaalis doon. At magapasalamt pa raw sila dahil may lilipatan sila.

8. That the defendants did not follow their father and stand remained in the northern portion.

Admitted… Matagal nang nakatira sila Apolonio at ang kanyang mga anak at ang kanyang
mga apo. May halaga na ang bawat bahay na nakatayo doon. At bigla silang paaalisin doon
ng wala namang karapatang magpaalis. Tinakot nila ang matanda dahil sa wala siyang hawak
na mga dokumento. Ang mga titulo at dokumento ay hawak ng mga Pamilya Gomez kung
saan siila ang tuwirang nagmamayari ng lupa. Si Crucia Galsim na ina ni Severa at Francisca ay
second wife ni Rufino Gomez.

9. That during the ocular inspection conducted by tha DAR, the defendants admitted that their
father is now occupying a lot with an area of 800 plus square meters located in the southern
portion, belonging to Severa.

Denied… Ang bahay ni Apolonio na ama ng mga defendants ay hindi hihigit sa 100 sq.m. At ito
ay hindi sakop ng southern portion. The defendants did not admit that their father occupied
800 sq.m. Ang totoo ay sinasaka nila ang buong lupain doon maliban lamang sa mga
napagtayuan ng mga bahay ng mga defendants.

ll. TRUE ISSUES

1. The plaintiff do not have the right to eject the defendants from the disputed lots.