Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POWER2014
July 28-31, 2014, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
POWER2014-32069
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF A COMPRESSED AIR DRIVEN TESLA TURBINE
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
● The inlet was set as velocity-inlet boundary.
For the turbulent case the "turbulence
intensity is set to 5%", while
Figure 2: Velocity Magnitude
"nondimensional turbulent kinetic energy is
set to k* = 0.00375 and turbulent dissipation
rate is ε* = 2.6953e-4"
● Pressure-outlet boundary was selected for the
outlet with gauge pressure set as 0
(atmospheric pressure)
● The walls are adiabatic and discs and main
body have a no slip condition and are
"rotating at 0.005"
● Figure 3: Infection of Radial Velocity
CONVERGENCE CRITERIA
Different models took different times to solve
ranging from 4 minutes for a model having about
seven thousand quadrilateral cells to 4 days for the
model with close to 2.5 million cells (3D).
LAMINAR CASE
For the laminar case it is noticed that the flow has
very high acceleration at the inlet and outlet of the Figure 4: pressure distribution
turbine. Inflections are noticed on the profile of the
radial velocity at the centre of the disc. It is also
observed that at the middle of the gap the total
Characteristics curves of the turbine under the
pressure remains the same, this shows that no work laminar solution case are shown below
is done here. However, close to the walls a change in
pressure is observed which shows that work is done.
It is further observed that the loading coefficient and
flow rate are directly related. Thus with increasing
flow rate, the efficiency increases for a instant,
followed by a continuous fall.
Figure 11: Efficiency Turbulent Case Figure 13: Comparison with Schmid[6]
Figure 11: Efficiency Turbulent Case Figure 13: Comparison with Schmid[6]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The support from Air University and Higher
Education of Pakistan is acknowledged.
REFERENCES
[1] North, Richard, C.: „An Investigation of the Tesla Turbine”.
Thesis, University of Maryland, 1969
[2] Tesla Nikola: „Turbine”. Patent no: 1,061,206., United
States Patent Office, Nikola Tesla, of New York N. Y.,
Patented May 6, 1913;
[3] Fluent Inc.: Fluent/UNS/Rampant.„User’s Guide”, 2000
Figure 16: Efficiency, Turbulent Case [4] Fluent Inc.: Gambit. „User’s Guide”. 2000.
[5] Rice, Warren: „Tesla Turbomachinery”. Conference
CONCLUSION: Proceedings of the 4th International Tesla Symposium,
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Yugoslavia,
The actual flow is in the transition regime
September 22‑ 25, 1991
and so is very difficult to simulate with CFD [6] Schmidt D. D.: „Final Report on Biomass Boundary Layer
tools. However, the results show different Turbine Power “ Energy Innovations Small Grant, EISG Final
Report, Appendix A FAR 00-06, 2002
aspects and attributes of the flow. It is found
that the inflection point of the laminar flow
vanishes in the turbulent flow, as the
turbulent flow has a balance in the axial
direction. Experimentally the velocity
profiles cannot be measured because of the
very small disc spacing, only the static
pressures at a point can be found, but CFD
can overcome this problem. Due to the high
swirl velocity and accelerations it becomes
difficult to get a good solution, but with more
iteration a solution can be converged to one
which can demonstrate physical facts. It can