PLANNING COMMISSION

July 9th 2019

City Hall 4580 S. 2300 E.

Note: special start time and meeting rooms

PRE-MEETING ITEMS

*6:00 PM WORK SESSION & MEAL – Held in the Mt. Olympus Room, *Earlier Start Time -- All agenda items may be
discussed but no decisions or voting will be made during this portion of the meeting.

MEETING ITEMS

7:00 PM CONVENE REGULAR MEETING – Held in the Big Cottonwood Room - Public Welcome & Chair Opening
Statement

PUBLIC HEARING

1. Holladay Hills (Cottonwood Mall Site) -- Conceptual Review of Overall Subdivision of 56 acres of land –
Applicant, Steve Peterson -- The proposal will be reviewed per the previously approved 2007 Site Development
Master Plan (SDMP) and Holladay Ordinance 13.65.070(C), RM-U zone

2. Holladay Hills (Cottonwood Mall Site) -- Conceptual Site Plan -- Mixed-Use development -- Block “D” (3.6
acres) – Approximately 4835 S Highland Drive (Cottonwood Mall site) -- The proposal will be reviewed per
the previously approved 2007 Site Development Master Plan (SDMP) and Holladay Ordinance 13.65.070(C), RM-
U zone

ADJOURN

On ________ at 2:00 pm a copy of the foregoing notice was posted in conspicuous view in the front foyer of the City of Holladay City Hall, Holladay,
Utah. A copy of this notice was faxed to the Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News, newspapers of general circulation in the City by the Office of the City
Recorder. A copy was also faxed or emailed to the Salt Lake County Council, Cottonwood Heights City and Murray City. The agenda was also posted at
city hall, Holladay Library, city internet website at www.cityofholladay.com and state noticing website at http://pmn.utah.gov.

Reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities or those in need of language interpretation service can be provided upon request. For
assistance, please call 801-527-3890 at least 48 hours in advance.
TTY/TDD users should call 7-1-1
The Chair shall call the meeting to order at the appropriate time, greet the people, and read the
following statement:

• The City of Holladay Planning Commission is a volunteer citizen board whose

function is to review land use plans and other special studies, make
recommendations to the City Council on proposed zoning map and ordinance
changes, and approve conditional uses and subdivisions.

• The Planning Commission does not initiate land use applications; rather acts on
applications as they are submitted. Commissioners do not meet with applicants
except at publicly noticed meetings.

• Commissioners attempt to visit each property on the agenda, where the location,
the nature of the neighborhood, existing structures and uses related to the
proposed change are noted.

• Decisions are based on observations, recommendations from the professional

planning staff, the City’s General Plan, zoning ordinance and other reports, by all
verbal and written comments, and by evidence submitted, all of which are part of
the public record.

• Meeting procedure can be found on the back of the agenda.

Rules of the City of Holladay Planning Commission for Public Hearings

The Planning Commission Chair or Vice Chair is the Presiding Officer and will conduct
the hearing.

1. Introduction. The Presiding Officer informs those attending of the procedure

and order of business for the hearing.
2. Staff Presentation. City Staff briefly introduces the request that prompted the
public hearing. The presentation shall not last more than five minutes.
3. Sponsor Presentation. If desired, the applicant or his/her representative may
also make a presentation. The presentation shall not last more than fifteen
minutes.
4. Public Comment. The Presiding Officer asks for public comment on the
matter before the Commission. Comments are limited to three minutes and
speakers are allowed to speak only once. Speakers are requested to:
(a) Complete the Citizen Comment Form
(b) Wait until recognized before speaking
(c) Come to the microphone and state their name and address for the record
(d) Be brief and to the point
(e) Not restate points made by other speakers
(f) Address questions through the Presiding Officer
(g) Confine remarks to the topic
(h) Avoid personalities

After each citizen has spoken, Commission members may ask questions of
the participant before the Presiding Officer resumes or closes the hearing.

5. Applicant Summation/Response. Following citizen comment and questions

by the Commission, the applicant shall be given an opportunity to give up to
fifteen minutes summation and/or response prior to closing of the public
hearing.
6. Closing the Hearing. If there is no further public comment, questions by
Commission members, or final response by the applicant, the Presiding
Officer shall conclude the hearing at least ten minutes in advance of a
subsequently scheduled public hearing. The Commission may vote to extend
the public hearing past the starting time of a subsequent public hearing.
7. Consideration of Item. At the close of the public hearing, the Commission
shall consider the item, discuss its merits and vote on the matter or vote to
continue it at a future meeting.
 CITY OF HOLLADAY
Planning Commission
July 9th, 2019
Item #1

Request: CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL

Project: Holladay Hills) -- Conceptual Review of Overall Subdivision of 56 acres of land previously
approved per 2007 Site Development Master Plan (SDMP) and Holladay Ordinance
Address: Approximately 4835 South Highland Drive (Cottonwood Mall Site)
Zone: RM-U (Regional Mixed Use
Applicant: Steve Peterson, Holladay Hills, LLC
Notice: Mailed notice to property owners within 500 feet of the site on June 28, 2019
Planner: Paul Allred, Jonathan Teerlink

GOVERNING ORDINANCES:
 13.65.070(C) -- RM-U Zone
 13.10.50 -- CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISIONS SUBMISSION
 2007 SITE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN (SDMP)

REQUIRED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:

 Creation of a new subdivision plat requires review and approval by the Land Use Authority (Planning
Commission) in a three-step process; Concept, Preliminary and Final plat.
 The conceptual plat in front of the Commission this evening requires a public hearing. The
Commission should allow for ample time for the public to comment on this proposal and for
Commission, applicant and staff discussion as well.

SUMMARY

 This overall proposed development of the old Cottonwood Mall Site is outlined in the attached
overview by the applicant, Steve Peterson and is subject to the approved (2007) Site Development
Plan (SDMP).
 The attached Conceptual Subdivision proposes to follow the current SDMP, and, is not an amendment
to it.
 Some characteristics of the proposed Plat/Area are:
 There are a total of twelve (12 Blocks) of varying sizes proposed
 All roads in the development will be privately owned and operated
 The site will be a mixed use development with massing and intensity of uses away from the
abutting residential areas
 Access to the site will continue to be from the current ingress/egress points
 There will be traffic management and signalization improvements associated with the
development

HOLLADAY HILLS CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION 07/09/2019

  There will some minor street dedications as part of the platting process
 A public trail along much of the perimeter is proposed

TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTE ANAYSIS

 The City’s Technical Review Committee has examined the conceptual plat and finds good overall
compliance with the layout found in the SDMP, Page 4, Conceptual Phasing /Subdivision Plan.
 The applicant and their consultants quickly addressed the various items that the TRC indicated needed
to be corrected.
 The following are items that the TRC recommends should be corrected:
 There is a slight discrepancy in the legal description between the 2007 SDMP and the proposed
overall plat description. At a later portion of the platting process, this should be resolved.
 The proposed Plat shows a new Block “M” which is not shown in the SDMP. The TRC
recommends that the concept Plat be revised to only show the original Blocks A-L, and, that
any future division of the Blocks occur after the Final Plat is recorded through amending the
overall Plat.
 The TRC understands that some or all of “River Walk Lane” which is the right-of-way
between the buildings and the creek may or will be used for a pedestrian/bike trail and not for
general vehicular access. If such is the case, at a later stage in the plat or site plan process, it
should be noted that any such portions will be restricted to emergency/service and delivery
vehicles only.

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of the Conceptual Subdivision with the comments and corrections previously
mentioned above for the Commission to consider and adjudicate.

FINDINGS:

1) The City TRC finds that the Conceptual Subdivision for Holladay Hills complies with the
requirements for submissions, the SDMP and the RM-U Zone.
2) The required public notice and public hearing have been held
3) The applicant has held required neighborhood meeting(s)
4) Public input has been gathered and considered

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:

1) Revise the Conceptual Plat as directed by the Commission

SUPPORTING MATERIALS
 Public Notice Mailer
 Property Ownership Affidavit
 Applicant narrative from Steve Peterson
 Neighborhood Meeting note
 Zone Map – associated aerial imagery

HOLLADAY HILLS CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION 07/09/2019

  R-M/U Zone Text
 Proposed Conceptual Subdivision Plat
 Conceptual Phasing/Subdivision Plan (Page 4) of the SDMP

HOLLADAY HILLS CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION 07/09/2019

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
4580 South 2300 East
City of Holladay, Utah 84117

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING

For
Conceptual Subdivision and Site plan, “Block D”

Date: Tuesday, July 9th 2019

Time: Approximately 7:00 pm
Location: Holladay City Hall, City Council Chambers, 4580 South 2300 East
Hearing Body: Planning Commission

Notice is hereby given that the City of Holladay Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing at the
above time and location to receive comment during their review of a conceptual subdivision plan and site plan
for “Lot D” within “Holladay Hills” a 56-acre, mixed-use development proposal in the R/M-U zone located at
4835 South Highland Drive (Cottonwood Mall). Presented for review at this meeting will be a conceptual;
subdivision phasing plan, a site-wide project layout and an individual site plan for “Lot D” (3.637 acres). All
conceptual proposals will be reviewed by the Planning Commission for compliance with the SDMP (2007) and
Holladay Ordinance 13.65.070(C).

Project Name: “Holladay Hills”

Location: 4835 S Highland Dr
Request: Concept Subdivision
Plan and Concept Site
plan for “Lot D”
Applicant: Steve Peterson

If you have questions please contact the City of Holladay

Community Development Department at 801-527-3890 during
regular business hours, Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm

ATTENTION: This notice has been Mailed June 28th 2019, by order of the Community Development Department, Paul Allred, Director to all residents within an area
extending approximately 500 feet from the subject property. If you know of anyone who may not have received a notice but may have an interest in the meeting, please
pass along the information. If you are not the owner of your residence, please notify the owner regarding this matter. Thank you.
In November 1999, together as a community we incorporated the City of Holladay. In the financial
feasibility analysis to operate our City, the Cottonwood Mall site was considered a key source of revenue
for our City and assist in its financial viability.

General Growth Properties (GGP) first announced plans to redevelop the mall in July of 2007. A month
later, the Holladay City Council deemed the shopping mall blighted. GGP tore down the mall in mid-2008
as the beginning of redevelopment. Original redevelopment plans called for a Lifestyle Center to be built
around the existing Macy's store. Redevelopment of the mall halted in 2009 when GGP filed for
bankruptcy.

Millrock Capital and Woodbury Corporation in 2019 entered into a purchase agreement with the
Howard Hughes Corporation (existing Owners) to redevelop the Cottonwood Mall site based on the
current vested entitlements granted to GGP in 2007.

Holladay Hills (new name for the Cottonwood Mall site) is applying for approval under the 2007 Site
Development Master Plan (SDMP) for the Subdivision Plat and Site Plan approvals per "Block" by block
within the SDMP entitlements approved by the City of Holladay in 2007 and thereafter acknowledged,
passed and approved per resolution No. 09-26 by the City Council on July 16th, 2009.

We anticipate the development will be completed within a range of five to ten years subject to market
conditions. We are currently experiencing an overwhelming interest in all aspects of our Luxury mixed-
use Lifestyle Center.

Warm Regards,

Steve Peterson

Holladay Hills, LLC

6510 South Millrock Drive, Suite #450 Holladay, Utah 84121

www.HolladayHills.com
Holladay Hills
shopping district

CA P I TAL
www.MillrockCapital.com

Holladay Hills

Holladay, Utah
Number of Stories?
Theater part of the original plan? (Open zone = any of these uses)

Which is the highest building? Macy’s?

How tall are the condos? 75 – 80’

Will right side be open space?

Where is Block D?

Is Theater still coming in?

How large is the plaza? At least as much a 2007 sf

COMMENTS

How can we make it best?

No more nail salons, probably cannot afford the rent (by Mansell)

Prefer residence rather than a park? The agreement is for 4 single family homes, we have to modify the
agreement if it is just a park.

Are all of the resident lots the original plan?

There is no ingress or egress (only on Highland Drive) existing bridges not even fire lanes?

The residential is 614 units? Yes.

How will the Townhouses height be?

A: the parking structure 3 levels would be tucked into the hillside .

What is the time frame the hotel will be up and running? 24 months together with the Macy’s building

You guys are still going to master plan it? Yes.

Does the city need to approve the master plan? The lot plat is approved, yes, it is market driven.

How would the National Reit impact? They are just investors.

If someone donated park land would city be owners? Yes.

Loudspeakers can be heard from the Holladay Plaza occasionally that is okay, weekly is not okay.

Sustainability + Solar

Lighting: Block F, light pollution, want lights to face down.

Ren and Sandie Rice stated that the old JCPenney sign shined into their backyard.
 Chapter 13.65
REGIONAL/MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT
13.65.010: VISION STATEMENT:

The vision for the regional/mixed-use zoning district anticipates development of a vibrant community
within the greater community based on traditional neighborhood development (TND) patterns. These
traditional patterns include a variety of housing types and workplaces, together with shopping, various
services, entertainment, and gathering spaces. By bringing many of the activities of daily living into
walking distance, designing walkable streets and human scale buildings, lessening the effect of urban
heat islands by reducing asphalt surfaces and increasing landscaping, residents and visitors alike will
benefit. Lifestyle changes that include walkability, using public transit and reducing the number and
length of automobile trips, lessen traffic congestion and its associated air pollution and support a
sustainable environment throughout the whole community. Regional commercial developments are an
important commercial asset of the city's tax base and of primary importance for the economic health of
the city. (Ord. 2012-15, 9-20-2012)

13.65.020: PURPOSE:

The purpose of this chapter is to guide development within the zoning district, while allowing flexibility,
creative expression, minimize impact on surrounding properties and assure quality control within the
site. Development standards for the R/M-U zoning district will allow for overall development that
encompasses a mix of uses including residential and nonresidential uses within the same building,
and inviting public and private spaces in a manner that promotes walkability and human interaction.
Guiding building location, massing, architecture and mixture of uses is intended to produce a variety of
spaces within the site. Variety within the site will create a project that is safe, comfortable, and
interesting for pedestrians, will reduce vehicular/pedestrian conflicts and will provide ample social and
economic opportunities for those persons and businesses that occupy the land and for those who will
make the development their destination. (Ord. 2012-15, 9-20-2012)

13.65.030: SCOPE:

All development within the R/M-U zoning district is subject to the provisions and standards found
herein. Additionally, other applicable regulation within this title shall apply. A site development master
plan (SDMP) specific to any development and approved by the city council shall control the
development of all property within an R/M-U zoning district. (Ord. 2012-15, 9-20-2012)

13.65.040: MINIMUM AREA REQUIREMENT:

Any R/M-U zoning district shall be a minimum of thirty (30) contiguous acres. This requirement does
not preclude separate ownership of buildings within the zoning district. (Ord. 2012-15, 9-20-2012)

13.65.050: DEVELOPMENT OWNERSHIP:

The development shall be in single, partnership, or corporate ownership or under options to purchase
by an individual or corporate entity at the time of application, or the application shall be filed jointly by
all owners of the property. (Ord. 2012-15, 9-20-2012)

13.65.060: SITE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN (SDMP):

A. The SDMP will serve in the same way as the city's general plan does in guiding future growth in the
larger community; it is a comprehensive but flexible guide for the overall development and design
of the entire site. The SDMP summarizes the maximum contemplated extent of development and
gives a realistic indication of its mass, scale, appearance, relationship to surrounding uses as well
as how it internally functions.

B. The SDMP shall include the following elements:

1. Land use regulating plan showing the proposed distribution and types of all uses, projected
densities, etc.

2. An overall conceptual phasing/subdivision plan.

3. Open space/gathering place plan including location, size, etc.

4. Building massing and heights including proposed floor area ratio.

5. Utility capacity and availability.

6. Traffic control and circulation plans and studies including estimated traffic impacts during
construction and demand at build out with potential impacts and possible connections with mass
transit, bike and pedestrian trails facilities.

7. Overall parking plan.

8. Thoroughfare locations, types and direction of travel.

9. Street cross sections.

10. Typical examples of streetscape design including aesthetic elements.

11. Overall conceptual site lighting plan.

12. Civil engineering conceptual plans including grading, storm drainage and utilities.

13. Architectural elevations with examples of anticipated design architectural style(s).

14. Examples of anticipated building materials.

15. Environmental and energy efficiency statement of intent.

16. A general signage plan for the exterior and interior of the site.

17. Estimated statistical information for the project.

18. Estimated raw square footage of building by residential or nonresidential use, etc.
 19. Geotechnical studies or data supporting proposed level of development.

20. Other studies/information as deemed necessary by the city.

21. A site construction control and overall environmental quality control hazard mitigation and
monitoring plan. (Ord. 2012-15, 9-20-2012)

13.65.070: PROJECT APPROVAL PROCEDURES:

A. Site Development Master Plan: Prior to the issuance of any building permit and/or construction of
any new, permanent buildings within an R/M-U zoning district, excluding any temporary structures
associated with construction activities, the city shall approve a site development master plan.

1. The applicant shall submit a proposed site development master plan to the community
development director for review and recommendation by the technical review committee (TRC).

2. The TRC shall forward the application to the planning commission for review and
recommendation.

3. The planning commission shall hold a public hearing prior to making a recommendation to the
city council.

4. Approval or disapproval of a site development master site plan (SDMP) for an overall project
within the R/M-U zoning district shall be determined by the city council after receiving a
recommendation from the planning commission.

5. The city shall only approve an SDMP for those projects that comply with the vision and purpose
of this chapter, and other applicable sections of this code.

B. Development Agreement: A development agreement between the developer and the city of
Holladay shall grant specific rights pursuant to an approved site development master plan (SDMP)
and shall include and specifically address any additional development related considerations
integral to the proposal not already governed by applicable land use and planning regulations. The
following items shall specifically be addressed by the development agreement:

1. Duration of the development agreement.

2. The maximum height of buildings.

3. Land uses permitted, their minimum and maximum intensities and the manner in which they are
combined within the development site.

4. The density permitted within the development site, provided in dwelling units per acre (DUA).

5. The intensity permitted within the development site, provided as a floor area ratio (FAR).

6. Provision for reservation or dedication of land (for example, dedication of ROW or park land) if
any, by any and all parties to the development agreement.

7. Provisions relating to cost allocation, funding for infrastructure, capital improvement costs,
impact fees and the like, to be provided by any and all parties to the development agreement.
 8. Other corollary agreements, covenants or declarations of restrictions accepted, which may
encumber or otherwise affect the development site.

C. Phasing: The site development master plan is for all parcels within the R/M-U zoning district.
Construction of the project may be phased as reasonably needed by the developer. Each phase
shall be of such size, composition and arrangement that its construction, marketing and operation
is feasible as a unit independent of any subsequent phases. The planning commission shall review
and approve individual phases and/or subdivision plats of the project for compliance to the SDMP
and development agreement. Submissions for individual phases of the project shall follow the
submissions procedure as outlined in chapters 13.06 and 13.08 of this title, the SDMP and/or as
specified in the development agreement.

D. Administrative Approval: Upon approval by the planning commission of each phase of the project,
individual elements including site preparation, infrastructure improvements and specific buildings
or structure permits shall be approved by the community development director. No such approval
shall be granted unless the application meets requirements of the approved SDMP, the
development agreement and any other pertinent code or regulation.

E. Property Rezoned: For any property rezoned R/M-U, a building permit must be issued pursuant to
an approved SDMP and/or development agreement within twenty four (24) months of the adoption
of the zoning district or said zoning shall expire reverting to the previous zone designation. (Ord.
2012-15, 9-20-2012)

13.65.080: AMENDMENTS TO SITE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN:

A. Material or substantive amendments to the overall SDMP shall require an amendment to the
SDMP.

B. Community development director has the responsibility to determine if a modification is substantive.

The following are substantive amendments:

1. A proposed modification exceeds maximum allowable height, density and/or intensity.

2. Proposed modification in density (residential) or intensity (floor area ratio) which varies by ten
percent (10%) or more of that approved for a given sector (restricted, limited or open).

3. The height of an exclusively residential building is proposed to be increased by more than ten
feet (10') or ten percent (10%), whichever is less.

4. The height of any other building is proposed to be increased by more than fifteen feet (15') or
fifteen percent (15%), whichever is greater.

5. The footprint of a building is proposed to be moved by more than fifty feet (50') in any horizontal
direction.

6. Any change in the designated land use (for example, from restricted to open).
C. Upon determination that a proposal meets one or more of the criteria above, the community
development director shall forward the proposal to the planning commission for review at a public
hearing and recommendation.

D. The city council, after a public hearing, shall approve, approve with amendments or deny the
proposed modification to the SDMP. (Ord. 2012-15, 9-20-2012)
 Conceptual Phasing/Subdivision Plan

Total Land Area by Block

Commercial Use by Block

Block

- 370,672

- 278,004

Residential Uses by Block

*Phasing shown on master plan is subject to market conditions and change

Draft Date: 12/12/07 Page 4 of 28

Cottonwood
Site Development Master Plan - Regional Mixed-Use Development
These plans are instruments of professional service and are protected by Common Law, Statutory, and other Reserved Rights including
Copyright. They may not be reproduced or used for any purpose without the written consent of General Growth Properties, Inc.
 Δ=49°37'00"

HOLLADAY HILLS
R=225.79'
L=195.53' A
Δ=18°38'00" RB
R=1121.28' (P O
UB R
S 46°48'01" W 200.20' L=364.65' LI
C LA
)
NE

SUBDIVISION
S 34°14'59" E 64.50' BLOCK M
73,884 SF Δ=19°35'00" SITE
Δ=81°03'00" 4380
1.696 AC
R=821.00'
R=127.34' L=280.61'
L=180.13'
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9 & NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10,

4385
TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST,
SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN T DRI VE
R/M-U ZONE ' SUNSE S 36°24'59" E 8.50'

4390
5 97.0
'
Δ=41°24'00"
.2 BLOCK L
29 166,673 SF R=214.51' VICINITY MAP
CONCEPTUAL PLAT 9 4390
3.826 AC

4375
L=155.00'
"E
SCALE: N.T.S.

5 9
5'

49
BEVERL

.0'
4 Y PARK

4370
4°

43
4

49.0'
75
E S
N

WILSHIRE ROAD
LA BLOCK K BLOCK H
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
YIC) 294,370 SF 140,731 SF
R 6.758 AC 40
0
VE
3.231 AC TYPICAL CREEK
OPUBL

90
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 9, 4 I HIGH WATER LINE

43
EM ( DR
TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST, SALT BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF MURRAY-HOLLADAY ROAD, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 00°03'51" EAST ALONG THE

K
SECTION LINE 658.03 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MURRAY-HOLLADAY ROAD AND NORTH 89°47'36" WEST ALONG SAID CENTER

REE
LAKE BASE & MERIDIAN. FOUND SALT LAKE
M
5 T BLOCK G N 85°00'59" W 351.80'
9
COUNTY BRASS CAP MONUMENT IN ASPHALT 43 E 49.0'
BLOCK N
LINE 632.67 FEET AND SOUTH 54°39'59" EAST 83.42 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE

NS
1 EAST, SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND RUNNING THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING (2)
145,710 SF

DC
0
94,959 SF
SU

437
COURSES: (1) NORTH 54°39'59" WEST 26.07 FEET, (2) SOUTH 89°47'36" EAST 127.55 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE UTAH POWER

BEVERLY PARK
SOUTH 1219.82' (RECORD) 3.345 AC
2.180 AC AND LIGHT PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID UTAH POWER AND LIGHT PARCEL THE FOLLOWING (4) COURSES: (1) SOUTH 21°59'01" WEST
S 00°03'51"E 1219.82' (MEASURED) S 00°03'51" W 2656.58' (MEASURED) S 00°02'52" E 2657.17' (RECORD)

O
42.15 FEET, (2) SOUTH 03°30'59" EAST 72.00 FEET, (3) SOUTH 06°38'59" EAST 127.12 FEET, (4) NORTH 78°59'01" EAST 179.90 FEET TO THE

WO
SOUTH 866.82' (RECORD) BASIS OF BEARING N 00°03'51" W 2668.20' (MEASURED) N 00°02'52" W 2666.36' (RECORD PER SALT LAKE COUNTY AREA REFERENCE PLAT) WESTERLY LINE OF THE SPRING FORTH INVESTMENTS PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID SPRING FORTH INVESTMENTS PARCEL THE
S 00°03'51" E 866.82' (MEASURED) EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 9, FOLLOWING (2) COURSES: (1) SOUTH 02°59'59" EAST 8.99 FEET, (2) NORTH 78°59'01" EAST 167.85 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE

TON
49.0' TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST, SALT WESTERLY LINE OF MEMORY LANE; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING (2) COURSES: (1) SOUTH
S 00°03'51" E 658.03' (MEASURED) 439
0 LAKE BASE & MERIDIAN (FOUND PLUG) 00°00'59" EAST 38.90 FEET, (2) SOUTH 44°45'59" EAST 929.25 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF ARBOR LANE, AS PER

COT
S 00°02'52" E 657.97' (RECORD) DEDICATION PLAT RECORDED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER IN BOOK N OF PLATS ON PAGE 1; THENCE
90
S 0°00'59" E 38.90' 43
BLOCK I
ALONG SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING (10) COURSES: (1) SOUTH 46°48'01" WEST 200.20 FEET TO A
POINT OF CURVATURE, (2) SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 127.34 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL

BIG
4385
151,004 SF
4375 ANGLE OF 81°03'00" A DISTANCE OF 180.13 FEET (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 06°16'31" WEST 165.49 FEET), (3) SOUTH 34°14'59" EAST 64.50
3.467 AC S 0°36'39" E 40.93' FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE, (4) SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 1121.28 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18°38'00" A DISTANCE OF 364.65 FEET (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 24°55'59" EAST 363.05 FEET) TO A POINT OF
RODEO DRIVE

49.0'
COMPOUND CURVATURE, (5) SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF 225.79 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL

49
ANGLE OF 49°37'00" A DISTANCE OF 195.53 FEET (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 09°11'31" WEST 189.48 FEET) TO A POINT OF COMPOUND

.0'
N 78°59'01" E 167.85' CURVATURE, (6) SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 821.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF

438
19°35'00" A DISTANCE OF 280.61 FEET (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 43°47'31" WEST 279.25 FEET), (7) SOUTH 36°24'59" EAST 8.50 FEET TO A
0'
0
55.
0 POINT ON THE ARC OF A 214.51 FOOT NON-TANGENT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT (CENTER BEARS NORTH 36°24'59" WEST), (8)
4360 437 SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 214.51 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°24'00" A DISTANCE OF
5
438

4365
N 56°10'59" W 151.55' 155.00 FEET (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 74°17'01" WEST 151.65 FEET), (9) NORTH 85°00'59" WEST 351.80 FEET, (10) SOUTH 00°36'39" EAST
40.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF HIGHLAND DRIVE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE THE

LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 9 AND NW 1/4 OF SEC. 10, T2S, R1E, SLB&M
31.0'
S 2°59'59" E 8.99'
SUNSET DRIVE

FOLLOWING (8) COURSES: (1) NORTH 56°10'59" WEST 151.55 FEET, (2) NORTH 39°48'39" WEST 1124.58 FEET TO A POINT OF SPIRAL
5
43
6 437 CURVATURE, (3) NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID SPIRAL CURVE, SAID CURVE BEING CONCENTRIC WITH AND 50.00 FEET

VE
0 RADIALLY DISTANT EASTERLY FROM A 200.00 FOOT TEN-CHORD SPIRAL FOR A 4° CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 196.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS,

RI BLOCK F

4365
TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A 1381.83 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT (CENTER BEARS NORTH 54°11'10" EAST), (4)
438
0 D 201,189 SF NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 1381.83 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°02'13" A DISTANCE OF

HOLLADAY HILLS SUBDIVISION

O ' 4.619 AC 70 724.42 FEET (CHORD BEARS NORTH 20°47'43" WEST 716.15 FEET), MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE, (5)
DE 9.0 43
N 78°59'01" E 179.85' 4 NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID SPIRAL CURVE, SAID CURVE BEING CONCENTRIC WITH AND 50.00 FEET RADIALLY

RO
70 DISTANT EASTERLY FROM A 200.00 FOOT TEN-CHORD SPIRAL FOR A 4° CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 196.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A
43 POINT OF TANGENCY, (6) NORTH 01°43'40" WEST 3.89 FEET, (7) SOUTH 88°12'51" WEST 10.00 FEET, (8) NORTH 01°43'40" WEST 43.18

4835 SOUTH HIGHLAND DRIVE

BLOCK J FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MURRAY-HOLLADAY ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE

41

DO
.0'
205,600 SF THE FOLLOWING (3) COURSES: (1) SOUTH 89°47'36" EAST 144.66 FEET, (2) SOUTH 00°11'01" WEST 15.00 FEET, (3) SOUTH 89°47'36" EAST
S 6°38'59" E 127.12' 4.720 AC 682.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

W
0
437

31
NT
S 3°30'59" E 72.00'

.0'
35.
0'

O
43 CONTAINS: 56.474 ACRES AND 15 LOTS

N
0
7 5 436 TYPICAL CREEK

LA
HIGH WATER LINE

HOLLADAY CITY, UTAH

NE
BLOCK E
39.0'

4370
S 89°47'36" E 127.55' S 21°59'01" W 42.15' CH 168,367 SF 65
AN 3.865 AC 43

P.O.B. 4375 IN .0'

4365 LA 49
NE '
PUBLIC R.O.W. 58
DEDICATION
49.
0' 60 0'
43 50. 4 .
0'

4360
2
MURRAY-HOLLADAY BOULEVARD

41.

NE 11

AM
N 54°39'59" W 26.07' L A
K W

Y'
AL 9 "

S
' 3

LA
W 8
ER 4
0'

NE
9°
60

49.
43

V 3
BLOCK D RI N
158,443 SF
(PUBLIC 80' R.O.W.)

3.637 AC E
BLOCK B2 4360
RIV
67,109 SF
D .) W
1.541 AC
.0'
43
55
N D' R. O.
BLOCK B1 38 A 80
S 89°47'36" E 682.56'

K L LI
21
296,071 SF 49.
9.0
'
EE H
C NORTH
.0'
0'
6.797 AC 4
CR IG (P B
U
IVE

O
D H
O
DR

CH

NW
O
AN

EXISTING BUILDING SCALE: 1" = 100'

O

TT
DE

IN

CO 6 0
43
LA

5 G
RO

BI
5
43
NE

4360 0 50' 100' 200' 300'

BLOCK C
152,355 SF TYPICAL CREEK
3.498 AC .0'
38 HIGH WATER LINE
31.
4360

0'

A NE NOTES
ROYCE STREET KL TEN CHORD SPIRAL
AL

DESCRIPTION
39.0'

W 1. LAND USE AND DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED SDMP

R L=196.50'
IVE
2. ALL PROPOSED STREETS ARE PRIVATE.

REVISIONS
R 435
0 3. ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN.

55
43
S 0°11'01" W 15.00' PUBLIC R.O.W. BLOCK A 43
55

DEDICATION 138,830 SF
3.187 AC
49.0'

DATE
S 89°47'36" E 144.66' N 1°43'40" W 3.89'
Δ=0°01'38" LEGEND PROJECT SUMMARY

REV
R=41472.00'
GROSS PROJECT AREA: 56.474 ACRES
L=19.65' Δ=30°02'13" SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY NET PROJECT AREA: 56.378 ACRES PROJECT NO: 19346
N 01°46'10" W 438.571' (RECORD PER 15 LOTS
SALT LAKE COUNTY AREA REFERENCE PLAT) R=1381.83' SECTION LINE ZONING: R/M-U DRAWN BY: JHF
TEN CHORD SPIRAL
HOLLADAY HILLS
N 01°43'40" W 438.66' (MEASURED)
L=724.42' MONUMENT LINE/CENTER LINE OF ROAD CHECKED BY: TJD
L=196.50' LOT LINE DATE: JULY 05, 2019
S 88°12'51" W 10.00'
SUBDIVISION
ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT LINE
N 1°43'40" W 43.18' 4360 EXISTING CONTOUR LINE

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION

SHEET CONCEPTUAL PLAT
CONCEPTUAL
PLAT
OWNER / DEVELOPER 1
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9 & NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10,
STEVE PETERSON

CP-1
HOLLADAY HILLS, LLC OF TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST,
6510 S. MILLCREEK DR. #450 SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN
HOLLADAY, UT 84121 1 R/M-U ZONE
 CITY OF HOLLADAY
Planning Commission
July 9th, 2019
Item #2

Request: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN -- BLOCK “D” -- HOLLADAY HILLS MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT
Project: Holladay Hills) -- Conceptual Review of Overall Subdivision of 56 acres of land previously
approved per 2007 Site Development Master Plan (SDMP) and Holladay Ordinance
Address: Approximately 4835 South Highland Drive (Cottonwood Mall Site)
Zone: RM-U (Regional Mixed Use
Applicant: Steve Peterson, Holladay Hills, LLC
Notice: Mailed notice to property owners within 500 feet of the site on June 28, 2019
Planner: Paul Allred, Jonathan Teerlink

GOVERNING ORDINANCES:
 13.65.070(C) – Regional Mixed Use Zone (RM-U)
 13.03 – SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
 13.06 – GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES
 13.08.050 – SITE PLAN
 2007 SITE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN (SDMP)
_______________________________________________________________________________________

REQUIRED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:

 Approval of a site plan requires review and approval by the Land Use Authority (Planning Commission)
in a three-step process; Concept, Preliminary and Final plat.
 The Conceptual Site Plan process is intended to check for initial compliance with overall requirements,
give direction to the applicant and staff regarding identified deficiencies, and, to allow the applicant to
move forward with preparation of more detailed plans for consideration at preliminary and final site plan
stages.
 The conceptual site plan plat in front of the Commission this evening requires a public hearing. The
Commission should allow for ample time for the public to comment on this proposal and for Commission,
applicant and staff discussion as well.
 The Planning Commission is free to act on the matter as they see fit upon consideration of the
completeness and the quality of the information provided by the applicant, TRC and public comment.
 Any motion by the Commission on this matter must be accompanied by findings to support the decision
including references to applicable codes, plans and standards.

TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REVIEW (TRC) EXCECUTIVE SUMMARY

 The first page of the SDMP gives a great deal of direction regarding the development of the site as a
whole including minimum and maximum requirements/allowances for residential and commercial space,
etc. It will be important for the developer, Commission and TRC to track the progression of built space
with each block/phase of the overall project to make sure there is overall compliance with the stated
tolerances.
  The applicant requests approval for a conceptual site plan approval for Block “D” of the proposed
Holladay Hills mixed-use development consistent with pages 1 and 4 of the SDMP “Conceptual
Phasing/Subdivision Plan” and is not an amendment to it.
 The proposed development pattern of Block “D” includes mixed-use residential and commercial on the
same block and in the same building (portions) which complies with the 13.65, RM-U Zone, and pages 1
and 3, “Permitted Land Uses by District and Building Functions”, of the SDMP.
 The uses and building heights for this block comply with allowances of page 3, “Open District”, page 6,
“Building Massing and Heights Plan”, and page 1 of the SDMP.
 Final approval of this Block is dependent upon the approval by the City Council of a Development
Agreement which will come later in this process and is not appropriate for discussion or consideration
by the Commission.
 Details such as grading, drainage, utilities, traffic, parking and other civil engineering matters will be
considered in greater detail at the next stage; preliminary plat. However, it should be noted that many of
the details are already known and have been substantially addressed within the SDMP.

TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ISSUES

 TRC recommends approval of the Conceptual Site Plan for Block “D” upon discussion of the following
clarifications and/or revisions to the Plan and other future issues:
1. Inclusion of commercial parking calculations for the overall parking for the Block.
2. Clarification of the building elevation directions and/or street frontages.
3. Labeling the commercial space on the east side of the main building (Sheet A901)
4. Clarification details on bridges, parking stall dimensions, required setback from buildings to the
Creek (top of bank) of the previously approved Stream Protection.
5. Staff suggests that “units” be indicated instead as “dwellings” or at worst “dwelling units”.
6. Traffic circulation
7. Tracking of developed space per Block.
8. Resolution of any title issues identified in the Property Report.

SUPPORTING MATERIALS

 Applicant narrative
 Proposed Conceptual Site Plan
 Building elevations
 Permitted Land Use by District and Building Functions (Page 3 SDMP)
 Conceptual Phasing/Subdivision Plan (Page 4 SDMP)
 “Building Massing and Heights Plan” (Page 6 SDMP)
 Public notice
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
4580 South 2300 East
City of Holladay, Utah 84117

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING

For
Conceptual Subdivision and Site plan, “Block D”

Date: Tuesday, July 9th 2019

Time: Approximately 7:00 pm
Location: Holladay City Hall, City Council Chambers, 4580 South 2300 East
Hearing Body: Planning Commission

Notice is hereby given that the City of Holladay Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing at the
above time and location to receive comment during their review of a conceptual subdivision plan and site plan
for “Lot D” within “Holladay Hills” a 56-acre, mixed-use development proposal in the R/M-U zone located at
4835 South Highland Drive (Cottonwood Mall). Presented for review at this meeting will be a conceptual;
subdivision phasing plan, a site-wide project layout and an individual site plan for “Lot D” (3.637 acres). All
conceptual proposals will be reviewed by the Planning Commission for compliance with the SDMP (2007) and
Holladay Ordinance 13.65.070(C).

Project Name: “Holladay Hills”

Location: 4835 S Highland Dr
Request: Concept Subdivision
Plan and Concept Site
plan for “Lot D”
Applicant: Steve Peterson

If you have questions please contact the City of Holladay

Community Development Department at 801-527-3890 during
regular business hours, Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm

ATTENTION: This notice has been Mailed June 28th 2019, by order of the Community Development Department, Paul Allred, Director to all residents within an area
extending approximately 500 feet from the subject property. If you know of anyone who may not have received a notice but may have an interest in the meeting, please
pass along the information. If you are not the owner of your residence, please notify the owner regarding this matter. Thank you.
In November 1999, together as a community we incorporated the City of Holladay. In the financial
feasibility analysis to operate our City, the Cottonwood Mall site was considered a key source of revenue
for our City and assist in its financial viability.

General Growth Properties (GGP) first announced plans to redevelop the mall in July of 2007. A month
later, the Holladay City Council deemed the shopping mall blighted. GGP tore down the mall in mid-2008
as the beginning of redevelopment. Original redevelopment plans called for a Lifestyle Center to be built
around the existing Macy's store. Redevelopment of the mall halted in 2009 when GGP filed for
bankruptcy.

Millrock Capital and Woodbury Corporation in 2019 entered into a purchase agreement with the
Howard Hughes Corporation (existing Owners) to redevelop the Cottonwood Mall site based on the
current vested entitlements granted to GGP in 2007.

Holladay Hills (new name for the Cottonwood Mall site) is applying for approval under the 2007 Site
Development Master Plan (SDMP) for the Subdivision Plat and Site Plan approvals per "Block" by block
within the SDMP entitlements approved by the City of Holladay in 2007 and thereafter acknowledged,
passed and approved per resolution No. 09-26 by the City Council on July 16th, 2009.

We anticipate the development will be completed within a range of five to ten years subject to market
conditions. We are currently experiencing an overwhelming interest in all aspects of our Luxury mixed-
use Lifestyle Center.

Warm Regards,

Steve Peterson

Holladay Hills, LLC

6510 South Millrock Drive, Suite #450 Holladay, Utah 84121

www.HolladayHills.com
Holladay Hills
shopping district

CA P I TAL
www.MillrockCapital.com

Holladay Hills

Holladay, Utah
 BLOCK J BLOCK I

H
RT
NO
CHA
SCALE: 1" = 30'

NIN
4365

L
ANE
0 15' 30' 60' 90'
RODEO DRIVE
S 41°18'43" E 102.76'

24.5
'
BLOCK B2

24.5
'

'
6 8 .50
2
6" E

MIN ESS DR
ACC
8'3

. 26
2°5
S6

.0' W IVE
IDE
43
60

RETAIL / RESTAURANT

8.0'
SITE

43
64
N 31
E
RIV
EOD MIN. 26.0' WIDE
VICINITY MAP
ROD
°40'1
8.0'
ACCESS DRIVE
SCALE: N.T.S.

5" E
113.

LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 9 & NW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, T2S, R1E, SLB&M
PROJECT SUMMARY
75'

BLOCK D OF HOLLADAY HILLS SUBDIVISION

S 48°41'17" W 523.62'
3.637 ACRES
ZONING: R/M-U

63
43
60

4835 SOUTH HIGHLAND DRIVE

43

PARKING STRUCTURE
BLOCK E LEVEL STALLS PROVIDED

BLOCK D LEVEL 1 107 STALLS

158,443 SF LEVEL 2 139 STALLS

HOLLADAY HILLS
3.637 AC

HOLLADAY CITY, UTAH

STREET PARKING 18 STALLS

AMY'S LANE
TOTAL STALLS 264 STALLS
24.5' 24.5'
CHANIN LANE

BUILDING SUMMARY: 7 STORY

BLOCK C
62 UNIT TYPE COUNT
43
60

1 BEDROOM 90 UNITS
43

2 BEDROOM 72 UNITS

RESIDENTIAL 3 BEDROOM 12 UNITS

436 2-STORY 17 UNITS
0
N 48°41'17" E 307.35'

TOTAL UNITS 191 UNITS

24.5' 24.5'
RETAIL / RESTAURANT 10,828 SQFT

436
0 LEGEND

BLOCK BOUNDARY

MONUMENT LINE/CENTER LINE OF ROAD

ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT LINE

RETAIL / RESTAURANT RETAIL / RESTAURANT
MIN. 26.0' WIDE 4360 CONTOUR LINE
8.0'
ACCESS DRIVE

NOTES

DESCRIPTION
1. LAND USE AND DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED SDMP
2. ALL PROPOSED STREETS ARE PRIVATE.

REVISIONS
3. ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN.
40.0' CREEK
SETBACK

40.0' CREEK
SETBACK
21.0'

RIVER WALK LANE

4360

4355

DATE
TRAIL ALONG CREEK
TYPICAL CREEK MIN. 20.0' OF HARDSCAPE,
HIGH WATER LINE Δ=0°04'27" APPROPRIATE FOR
BIG COTTONWOOD CREEK EMERGENCY ACCESS.
R=9216.00'

REV
TYPICAL CREEK
L=11.95' HIGH WATER LINE OWNER / DEVELOPER
4355 STEVE PETERSON PROJECT NO: 19346
N 39°48'39" W 287.51' HOLLADAY HILLS, LLC
6510 S. MILLCREEK DR. #450 DRAWN BY: JHF
HOLLADAY, UT 84121
4360 CHECKED BY: TJD
DATE: JULY 05, 2019
Δ=0°01'38" AVOID CUTTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES. IT'S COSTLY. NOTICE!
R=41472.00'
L=19.65' HIGHLAND DRIVE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
BLOCK D
(PUBLIC 80' R.O.W.)
BEFORE YOU
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION,
PROTECTION, AND RESTORATION
CONCEPTUAL
OF ALL BURIED OR ABOVE
GROUND UTILITIES, SHOWN OR
SITE PLAN

CS-D
NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
1-800-662-4111
Holladay Hills
shopping district

CA P I TAL
www.MillrockCapital.com

Holladay Hills

Holladay, Utah
 Permitted Land Uses by District and Building Functions

(Height Exception Allowed)

Site Districts
(40’ / 3 Story Maximum)
(60’ / 4 Story Maximum)
Note: Live/Work Units are not regulated as home occupational units.
(90’ / 5 Story Maximum)

DISTRICT

Draft Date: 12/12/07 Page 3 of 28

Cottonwood
Site Development Master Plan - Regional Mixed-Use Development
These plans are instruments of professional service and are protected by Common Law, Statutory, and other Reserved Rights including
Copyright. They may not be reproduced or used for any purpose without the written consent of General Growth Properties, Inc.
 Conceptual Phasing/Subdivision Plan

Total Land Area by Block

Commercial Use by Block

Block

- 370,672

- 278,004

Residential Uses by Block

*Phasing shown on master plan is subject to market conditions and change

Draft Date: 12/12/07 Page 4 of 28

Cottonwood
Site Development Master Plan - Regional Mixed-Use Development
These plans are instruments of professional service and are protected by Common Law, Statutory, and other Reserved Rights including
Copyright. They may not be reproduced or used for any purpose without the written consent of General Growth Properties, Inc.
 Building Massing and Heights Plan

General Height Guidelines

Building Height*:
Restricted:
Maximum: 40 Feet Height
Maximum: 35 Feet Height for single family lots greater than .20 acres
Minimum: No Dwellings shall contain less than one story
Limited:
Maximum: 60 Feet Height (4 Stories)
Minimum: No Dwellings shall contain less than one story
Open:
Maximum: 90 Feet Height (5 Stories); including screening walls,
architectural features and mechanical equipment. Not to exceed 80 Feet
Height in 50% or less of Total Square Footage located in District Area
Architectural Tower Feature not subject to height restrictions
Minimum: No Dwellings shall contain less than one story
*All Height Measurements are measured on New Proposed Grade Levels and shall be
measured from the center point average of each building structure (see page 23 of the
SDMP for proposed finished grade elevations)

Draft Date: 12/12/07 Page 6 of 28

Cottonwood
Site Development Master Plan - Regional Mixed-Use Development
These plans are instruments of professional service and are protected by Common Law, Statutory, and other Reserved Rights including
Copyright. They may not be reproduced or used for any purpose without the written consent of General Growth Properties, Inc.