Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cabizon, Angelie G.
Cozo, Julien Myka
Heraña, Pamela Kaye F.
Lopez, Ryan Miguel
Tonido, Cyle
Laboratory Report #3
Industrial Quality Control
September 23, 2018
PART I - PRESENTATION OF THE CASE
The Office of Student Affairs in Xavier University has been bustling with defected IDs
that would not swipe to the machines from the gate. It is well known that software
production organizations spend a sizeable amount of their project budget to rectify the
defects introduced into the software systems during the development process. An in depth
understanding of the mechanisms that give rise to defects is an essential step towards the
regulates the behavior of other devices or systems using control loops. It can range from a
large Industrial control systems which are used for controlling processes or machines. For
process or operation. The control system compares the value or status of the process
variable (PV) being controlled with the desired value or set point (SP), and applies the
difference as a control signal to bring the process variable output of the plant to the same
value as the set point. For sequential and combinational logic, software logic, such as in
METHODOLOGY
This study involves gathering sufficient data to act as the basis of evaluation and
examination. The recorded data are subjected to examination and analysis; formalized
versions of this process are critical examination and systems analysis. The aim is to identify,
often through a structured, questioning process, those points of the overall system of work
that require improvements or offer opportunity for beneficial change. The aim here is to
identify possible actions for improvement and to subject these to evaluation in order to
develop a preferred solution. The researchers must acquire data from the Office of Student
Affairs and the University book store where the IDs are made to know certain information
regarding the study. The researchers must then identify the causes of defective IDs with the
help of IE tools and methods such as Ishikawa diagram, Surveys and other forms. After
arriving with the most probable or main reason for defective IDs the researchers must
This diagram is a product design and quality defect prevention to identify potential factors
causing an overall effect. Each cause or reason for imperfection is a source of variation. One
of the reasons why there are Identification cards that are defective is that the machine itself
have been jamming with its sticky roller delaying and distracting the analyst. This affects the
inexperienced analyst who types the wrong code causing the system to improper calibration
and information contamination. Since the demand would out pressure on time the analyst
or the person in charge will not double check the information of the ID specially barcodes
with the right inspection and trial. Also since there some students that did not follow the
rules and took the delayed step some of the ID's are in rushed that is why there are more
Data Gathered
N JUNE (4th JULY (1st JULY(2nd JULY(3rd JULY(4thweek) X R
week) week) week) week)
1 14 13 18 53 18 23.2 40
2 13 15 15 17 23 16.6 10
3 13 16 16 12 14 14.2 4
4 15 23 23 14 17 18.4 9
5 16 16 15 17 67 26.2 52
6 23 23 16 18 16 19.2 7
7 14 14 23 19 17 17.4 9
AVE 19.31429 18.71429
UCL = 27.15557
LCL= 11.473
LCLR 1.422286
UCLR 36.00629
Control Charts
R - Chart
60.0
50.0
40.0
UCL 36.0
30.0
20.0 CL 18.7
10.0
LCL 1.4
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period
Figure 1.1- Control chart for complaints in Identification Cards in Xavier University (Range)
The control chart is a graph used to study how a process changes over time. Data are
plotted in time order. A control chart always has a central line for the average, an upper line
for the upper control limit and a lower line for the lower control limit. These lines are
determined from historical data. The control chart is a graph used to study how a process
changes over time. Data are plotted in time order. A control chart always has a central line
for the average, an upper line for the upper control limit and a lower line for the lower
24.9
22.9
20.9
CL 19.31
18.9
16.9
14.9
12.9
LCL 11.47
10.9
8.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period
Figure 1.2-Control chart for complaints in Identification Cards in Xavier University (Median)
The chart contains a center line that represents the mean value for the in-control
process. Two other horizontal lines, called the upper control limit (UCL) and the lower
control limit (LCL). This shows the X-control chart for complaints in Identification Cards in
Xavier University. The upper control limit is 27.16 complaints. The center line is 19.31
Based on the data gathered, one of the reasons why there are Identification cards that
are defective is that the machine itself have been jamming with its sticky roller delaying and
distracting the analyst. This affects the inexperienced analyst who types the wrong code
causing the system to improper calibration and information contamination. Since the
demand would out pressure on time the analyst or the person in charge will not double
check the information of the ID specially barcodes with the right inspection and trial. Also
since there some students that did not follow the rules and took the delayed step some of
the ID's are in rushed that is why there are more defected IDs in the late batch.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. To make more observations to increase the accuracy rate of the study. Having more
2. Before conducting the ID processing make sure that the machine or other variation
3. Person in charge should always be active and avoid many errors. Make notes beside
5. Test IDs designed with the attribute of repeatability and universality within the
University.
APPENDIX
UCL = 27.15557
LCL= 11.473
LCLR 1.422286
UCLR 36.00629
R - Chart
60.0
50.0
40.0
UCL 36.0
30.0
20.0 CL 18.7
10.0
LCL 1.4
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period
X Chart
28.9
UCL 27.16
26.9
24.9
22.9
20.9
CL 19.31
18.9
16.9
14.9
12.9
LCL 11.47
10.9
8.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period
JUNE (4th week) - X Chart
28.9
UCL 27.2
26.9
24.9
22.9
20.9
CL 19.3
18.9
16.9
14.9
12.9
LCL 11.5
10.9
8.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period
JULY (1st week) - X Chart
28.9
UCL 27.2
26.9
24.9
22.9
20.9
CL 19.3
18.9
16.9
14.9
12.9
LCL 11.5
10.9
8.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period
JULY(2nd week) - X Chart
28.9
UCL 27.2
26.9
24.9
22.9
20.9
CL 19.3
18.9
16.9
14.9
12.9
LCL 11.5
10.9
8.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period
JULY(3rd week) - X Chart
58.9
53.9
48.9
43.9
38.9
33.9
23.9
CL 19.3
18.9
13.9
LCL 11.5
8.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period
JULY(4thweek) - X Chart
78.9
68.9
58.9
48.9
38.9
CL 19.3
18.9
LCL 11.5
8.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period