ISSUE: 20190702- Re: John Setka- the ALP and the constitution

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, what is your view about John Setka having pleaded guilty about misusing a
telecommunication item?
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, when it relate to telecommunication that ought to fall within
federal jurisdiction. Anyhow what is important is what the Framer of the Constitution embedded
in the constitution as a legal principle, being that if a man made an error and has been convicted
then once the sentence has been served the man should be allowed to take up his position within
society.
* So you do not regard it appropriate for him to be expelled from the ALP for having pleaded
guilty?
**#** I have been dealing within MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® special lifeline
service with people contemplating not only suicide but also murder even mass murder. And the
fact that John Setka may have used a mobile phone itself is to me not a major issue compared to
many contemplating hideous criminal conduct. He and his wife had an issue and we should leave
it by that, as the court made its decision.

I am amazed how Rosie Batty so to say went for the throat of John Setka because of a newspaper
article rather than to first check and verify what he really had, if anything, stated. If this is her
modus operandi then I wonder what else she did in the past to attack another person’s credibility.
.
Let it be clear when one of my sons was 11 years old his mother tried to strangle him, about an
hour after I dropped off the kids. His brother managed to push her off him and they escaped and
called me. My son had the marks on his neck and the next day a doctor provided a medical
report. Anyhow the same day at the police station she attacked another sleeping son who was on
chairs and the police officer then warned her that next time he would lock her up. Well, if a man
did the same he already would have been locked up. That night a Justice of the Peace placed the
children in my legal care. Later followed up by Children Court orders because it then was
discovered she had been torturing the children in many ways, over about a decade, even breaking
a cricket bat on one of them.

That is why this message about men not to be violent is missing the mark, because women can be
far worse and recently one allegedly committed suicide and murdered her 4 children.
That is why we should not make a message just against men, but rather have a general message
against any violence.
.
To me with Rosie Batty it is going over the top. So she attacks John Setka and then is given a job
with a hospital management. Well I wonder what kind of mentality this present.
.
QUOTE

p1 2-7-2019 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 "Clearly it's ludicrous and I think it's an example of somebody whose leadership role really needs to be challenged,
because it's not a reflection that's appropriate," she said.

"I'm quite astonished with those comments. Rather than feel, you know,
men have less rights, we have so much more to gain by recognising that
moving forward we're [moving to] a place of equality."

END QUOTE

Is this how she deals with matters?

When my former wife wanted me to stay the night but I refused she simply placed a butcher
knife onto my throat and well she achieved I was not leaving. I didn’t report it, but the children
did later, as they were horrified he did this to their father. She previously had already (while
represented by a lawyer) pleaded guilty of assault upon me. Later also, again while represented
by a lawyer, she pleaded guilty of assault upon one of our sons. As such I am not merely making
this up afterward a she made guilty pleas. And despite the violence conduct of her I did respect
her for pleading guilty each time. And John Setka pleading guilty should be respected for this.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-26/cfmeu-boss-john-setka-gets-good-behaviour-bond/11247432
Victorian CFMEU boss John Setka gets good behaviour bond over harassment charge
I honestly was pleasantly surprised his wife is seemingly supporting him. The bloke made an
error and well we should so to say not lynch him for that.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-10/rosie-batty-slams-john-setka-domestic-violence-comments/11195146
Rosie Batty slams CFMEU secretary John Setka's comments on family violence advocacy
QUOTE

The Victorian secretary of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), John Setka, has been under
pressure to resign from his role after he was charged earlier this year with using a carriage service to harass a woman.

On Friday, The Age newspaper reported that Mr Setka had told a recent meeting of the union's national executive that the
work of Ms Batty had led to men having few rights.

Mr Setka has not responded to the ABC's request for comment but told The Age his comments had been taken out of
context and he had great respect for Ms Batty.

Ms Batty, whose 11-year-old son Luke was murdered by his father in 2014, has today been appointed an Officer of the
Order of Australia for her advocacy for the prevention of family violence.

The 2015 Australian of the Year told the ABC Mr Setka's reported comments were at odds with a growing community
comprehension of discrimination faced by women.

"Clearly it's ludicrous and I think it's an example of somebody whose leadership role really needs to be challenged,
because it's not a reflection that's appropriate," she said.

"I'm quite astonished with those comments. Rather than feel, you know,
men have less rights, we have so much more to gain by recognising that
moving forward we're [moving to] a place of equality."
END QUOTE

I do not know the full story regarding Rosie Batty but I gained the understanding that she got a
court order against her husband and then seemingly nevertheless let Luke near his father. Well a
court order should not be used to manipulate once power as it appears to me too often being done
p2 2-7-2019 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
by people. If a court is requested to issue orders because there is parent who is a danger to a child
then surely the person pursuing the order should act in accordance to the court order and not
perhaps recklessly let a child to be in danger.
Whereas my former wife was time and again preventing access, once I had custody I made clear
I was going to show her how it should be done, and at no time after that was there any conflict
about her having access to the children.
Any how I wrote to John Setka a recent post, I had never any other contact with him:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-10/rosie-batty-slams-john-setka-domestic-violence-comments/11195146
QUOTE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Posted 1.16AM 15-1-2019
I have spent decades dealing with people (either gender) who were subjected to domestic
violence and had a former wife (represented by a lawyer!) pleading guilty to assault upon
me. Also in another case again represented by a lawyer pleaded guilty for nearly strangling
to death a child.
Anh other time she got again 6 months’ probation with again no conviction recorded. If a
man did the same he would beyond doubt be in prison without delay. She even threw a
sleeping child of the chairs in the police station. Another time I was woken up when a
woman had put herself unannounced on top of me to engage in sex. If a man did this it
would be called rape. When a woman does it then it is said the man was lucky.
I have been at various child care centres where women are coaching how to falsely blame
the husband of domestic violence and/or sexual abuse. One woman I assisted to gain
custody then afterwards made known she had fabricated the sexual abuse allegations
regarding the father as to ensure she would get custody.
Domestic violence can exist in many ways, not just being a physical assault. It is not
gender specific.
My wife, who is well past 80 years of age gave me the understanding that Rosie Batty is
milking the death of her son for everything she can.
As I understand it Rosie Batty had obtained a court order because of concerns that Luke
could be harmed by his father. And as I understand it despite of this she allowed Luke to go
near his father.
In my view when a court decides to issue a court order then both parties are bound to
respect this. However, I am too well aware that many women are using court orders as a
weapon against a man.
As I understand it had Rosie Batty respected the court orders and not allowed Luke to go
near his father then Luke might still be alive.
This ongoing nonsense of no violence against women and children has gone too far. The
message should be no violence against anyone. When however men are portrayed as the
perpetrators and women are the victims then it in my view results to a denial of equality for
men, in particular those men subjected to domestic violence in some form or other.
When I reported domestic violence to the police they laughed that surely I was strong
enough to hit her back. This I refused to do. Again I pursued the legal way and she pleaded
guilty!
What is needed is not to have one size of solution to just blame a man whenever there is a
problem but to deal with the origins of domestic violence of whatever sort it might be.
I am not going to go in all kinds of incidents safe to say that when a butcher knife is held to
your throat in front of the children then remaining calm is the best way to deal with
matters.
I find it sickening how men are portrayed as the evil doers when from personal experiences
I am well aware ample of women are perpetrators but because of this claim against men
they are far too often excused rather then held legally accountable.
One of my sons stated that essentially I had about 35 years ago ignored how his mother,
siblings and himself had to financial struggle after the divorce and I was nowhere to be
seen. I clarified that the court had settled the property settlement 40% for me and 60
p3 2-7-2019 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 percent for his mother because she had custody. Months later I held it better to let her have
my 40% also this so she didn’t have to sell the house. Her boyfriend was living with her.
So, somehow I was to have still funded for his mother live in boyfriend also.
And this is how women manipulate matters and deceive their children giving them a false
story so they will dislike if not hate their father. I explained that unbeknown to him and the
siblings at the time his mother actually wanted to get remarried but as she had lied
comprehensively in court I no longer trusted her and so declined to get remarried. She then
stopped access (regardless of court orders) and held the boyfriend to be now the father of
the children. In fact she stole my tools of trade, the court had awarded to me.
There are men who can be evil but so can women and it is this what should be addressed,
this as if you ignore the cause then blaming just men is never going to resolve the issue.
END QUOTE

I have been a victim of domestic violence over a long period of time but never used it to seek
revenge afterward. While misuse of telecommunication obviously shouldn’t be tolerated it was in
my view the least disturbing conduct.
* What about the ALP seeking to expel him?
**#** What a load of hypocrites. Some year ago a person provided me with details as to how
many Member of Parliament were convicted of all kind of criminal act, and if we are going to set
the bar at John Setka then many if not most politician should vacate the seats in the Parliament
they are now holding. I understand from various reports that John Setka is a person who is not
easy to go along with, but that should be considered along the line that he is in a position fighting
for the members of his union. A government should never interfere as to who should or shouldn’t
be a union leader. As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I view it is in fact none of the business of the
Federal Parliament as it is an internal state matter. I will spare you the details of what the
Framers of the Constitution stated about this. However, are we going to have those in the State
Parliament going to dictate moral issues when many of them were ripping off the taxpayers? In
my view politicians should stay out of it all and if they argue that John Setka is not good enough
to be a member of a federal political party then well let then all those politicians with criminal
convictions get out of the ALP or any other political party.
* Surely the ALP can decide who should or should not be a member?
**#** I have no issue with this but let they not be hypocrites about it. Let then expel every
member who had a criminal conviction from the party, and not use it to get rid of a union leader
who they may seek to get rid of.
* Didn’t the ACTU also push for him to be ousted, this even so they acknowledge he didn’t
make the alleged comment that were reported?

**#** It seems to be like the WMD (Weapon of Mass Destruction) nonsense. The truth no
longer is relevant. If John Setka didn’t say what Rosie Batty criticized him about then she should
apologize to him about it what she stated what I consider a smear against him.
*. You surely do not particularly like this Rosie Batty, so it seems to me.
**#** In my view what she did was unacceptable and placed her own credibility in question.
People may place her on some pedestal but to me I judge her upon the conduct she displayed to
attack a man not on what he stated but what allegedly he had stated without checking the fact.
And for the women of the ACTU leadership then so to say gang-up against John Setka I view
underline the problem we have where somehow women are not to be criticized regardless if they
act wrongly. My message would be to lay off from John Setka and face reality that violence is

p4 2-7-2019 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
not limited to a particular gender. At least John Setka by pleading guilty may be taken to have
learned a lesson and let us not crucify this man further.
If the man is a problem to his union member then it I for them to deal with him, but everyone
else I view should stay out of it.
*. You seem to speak up for John Setka as if you know him.
**#** I would do this for anyone else in a similar position. In this case we are dealing with a
man who is a union leader and we must not be armchair judges to judge him about what we may
or may not agree with as a conduct as a union leader. That is for his union members to decide. If
they support him then other should stay clear from this. It appear to me that he became the
victim of false media reporting and then severely attacked regardless of being innocent of what
he was accused of and instead of people showing consideration that he had a bit of a hard patch
in his marriage they are seeking to crucify him. As it appears to me his wife I standing by him
and let everyone respect this and likewise show consideration and stop this bullying against him.
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

p5 2-7-2019 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati