MEDIA RELEASE

(October 16, 2017)

FROM: Ronald D. Holmes

President
Pulse Asia Research, Inc.

RE: Pulse Asia Research’s September 2017 Nationwide Survey on

the Campaign Against Illegal Drugs

Pulse Asia Research, Inc. is pleased to share with you some findings on the
Campaign Against Illegal Drugs from the September 2017 Ulat ng Bayan national
survey. We request you to assist us in informing the public by disseminating this
information.

The survey fieldwork was conducted from September 24 – 30, 2017 using
face-to-face interviews.

The following are among the key developments that dominated the
headlines in the days leading up to the survey period as well as during the conduct
of the actual survey interviews:

1. The Senate Blue Ribbon Committee’s investigation into the shipment of

illegal drugs worth P 6.4 billion that slipped through the Bureau of Customs
(BOC) last May 2017 and the appearance of Davao City Vice-Mayor Paolo
Duterte and Atty. Manases Carpio before the committee on 07 September
2017 during which they denied any links to the reported drug smuggling
and corruption occurring in the BOC;

2. The refusal of former BOC Commissioner Nicanor Faeldon to attend

several hearings of the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee and his decision to
turn himself in to the Office of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms after Senator
Richard Gordon cited him for contempt for being absent in previous
hearings;
3. The filing of an ethics complaint against Senator Antonio Trillanes IV by
Senator Gordon arising from the former’s unparliamentary acts and
language as well as disorderly behavior during the 31 August 2017 on the
said drug shipment;

4. The filing of double murder charges against the Caloocan City policemen
and taxi driver implicated in the killing of Karl Arnaiz and Reynaldo de
Guzman and the sacking of virtually the entire Caloocan City police force
in the aftermath of the killing of these teenagers and a break-in and robbery
carried out by its members;

5. The statement made by President Rodrigo R. Duterte and Philippine

National Police (PNP) Chief Ronald dela Rosa denying any state policy to
kill drug suspects in the conduct of the administration’s “war on drugs”;

6. The trip to Singapore by Senator Trillanes to dispute allegations made by

President Duterte that he owns several accounts in foreign banks and the
lawmaker’s challenge to the President for the latter to sign bank waivers to
allow authorities to scrutinize his bank accounts to prove that he has no ill-
gotten wealth;

7. The threat made by President Duterte to create an independent commission

to investigate corruption within the Office of the Ombudsman after the
latter launched a fact-finding investigation into the alleged ill-gotten wealth
of the President and his family;

8. The commemoration of the 45th anniversary of the declaration of Martial

Law on 21 September 2017, with various groups staging protest actions
nationwide, as well as the observance of the 100th birthday of former
President Ferdinand E. Marcos, with his supporters holding a celebration
in the Libingan ng mga Bayani (LNMB);

9. The death of the so-called “most wanted drug lord” in Iloilo on 02

September 2017 during a shootout which ensued while the police was in
the process of serving him a warrant of arrest and the cancellation of Chief
Inspector Jovie Espenido’s transfer to Iloilo City from Ozamiz City;

10. The call made by the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines
(CBCP) for the Catholic faithful to light candles and offer prayers for 40
days for the victims of the administration’s “war on drugs”;

2
11. The suspected hazing death of a University of Santo Tomas (UST) law
student in the hands of members of the Aegis Juris Fraternity and the joint
hearing into the matter conducted by three (3) Senate Committees;

12. The approval by the House of Representatives on third and final reading of
the P 3.8 billion annual budget, with the budget of the Commission on
Human Rights (CHR) being slashed by P 115 million;

13. The confirmation by the military that Abdullah Maute, one of the leaders
of the Maute group responsible for the continuing crisis in Marawi City,
was killed during military operations in the area between 14 and 26 August
2017;

14. The arrest of Puerto Princesa City Vice-Mayor Luis Marcaida on 04

September 2017 for possession of illegal drugs found in his residence
during a raid conducted by the police and agents of the Philippine Drug
Enforcement Agency (PDEA);

15. The House Committee on Justice’s dismissal of the impeachment complaint

against Commission on Elections (COMELEC) Chairperson Andres
Bautista and the filing of an impeachment complaint against Supreme
Court Chief Justice Maria Lourdes A. Sereno;

16. The rejection by the Commission on Appointments (CA) of the

appointment of Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) Secretary Rafael
Mariano, the resignation of Department of Information and
Communications Technology (DICT) Secretary Rodolfo Salalima, and the
removal of Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA) Chief Anna Rosario
Paner;

17. The denial by the Office of the Ombudsman of the motion for
reconsideration filed by former President Benigno S. Aquino III in
connection with Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales’s 13 June 2017
order to charge him for usurpation of authority and violation of the Anti-
Graft and Corruption Practices Act arising from his decision to allow
former PNP Chief Alan Purisima, who was then under suspension, to lead
Oplan Exodus in Mamasapano, Maguindanao in January 2015;

18. The Sandiganbayan’s decisions to allow former Senator Jinggoy Estrada to

post bail for plunder and 11 violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt
Practices Act and to deny the motion for reconsideration filed by former
Makati City Mayor Jejomar Erwin Binay, Jr. in connection with the
anomalous Makati City Hall parking building project;

3
 19. In international news, the testing of a hydrogen bomb by North Korea on
03 September 2017 and its firing of an intermediate-range ballistic missile
on 15 September 2017; another terrorist attack in London which injured at
least 30 individuals which was supposedly carried out by a “detachment”
of the Islamic State (IS); the unresolved crisis in Myanmar which has seen
the continued exodus of thousands of Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar
into Bangladesh; the magnitude 7.1 earthquake that hit Mexico on 19
September 2017 which resulted in more than 270 deaths; the destruction
and deaths in the Caribbean, Cuba, Puerto Rico, and parts of the United
States caused by Hurricanes Irma and Maria; and

20. In economic and financial news, the continued strong performance of the
Philippine Stock Exchange index (PSEi) when it nearly breached the 8,300
mark as it reached another record high on 18 September 2017, closing at
8,294 points and the announcement of an increase in the minimum wage in
Metro Manila from P 481 to P 502 effective 05 October 2017.

As in our previous Ulat ng Bayan surveys, this nationwide survey is based

on a sample of 1,200 representative adults 18 years old and above. It has a ± 3%
error margin at the 95% confidence level. Subnational estimates for each of the
geographic areas covered in the survey (i.e., Metro Manila, the rest of Luzon,
Visayas and Mindanao) have a ± 6% error margin, also at 95% confidence level.
Those interested in further technical details may refer to our website
(www.pulseasia.ph)

Pulse Asia Research’s pool of academic fellows takes full responsibility for
the design and conduct of the survey, as well as for analyses it makes based on the
survey data. In keeping with our academic nature, no religious, political,
economic, or partisan group influenced any of these processes. Pulse Asia
Research undertakes Ulat ng Bayan surveys on its own without any party
singularly commissioning the research effort.

For any clarification or questions, kindly contact Ronald D. Holmes, Pulse

Asia Research President at 09189335497 (via mobile, Viber or Telegram) or at
ronald.holmes@gmail.com (via email.)

4
 Pulse Asia Research’s September 2017 Ulat ng Bayan Survey:
Media Release on the Campaign Against Illegal Drugs
16 October 2017

Public awareness of the Duterte administration’s “war on drugs” is virtually

universal (100%), with most of them (88%) expressing support for the campaign

In September 2017, awareness of the campaign against illegal drugs being carried out
by the national administration is essentially universal not only at the national level
but also across geographic areas and socio-economic classes (all at 100%). Levels of
awareness in the Philippines as a whole and in the various areas and classes have
remained unchanged year-on-year and from one quarter to another since September
2016. (Please refer to Table 1.)
Table 1
AWARENESS OF THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ILLEGAL DRUGS
September 2016 to September 2017 / Philippines
(In Percent)

Base: Total Interviews, 100%

Have you heard, read or watched

anything about the campaign LOCATION CLASS
against illegal drugs of the BAL
current administration? RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

AWARE Sep '17 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Jun '17 99 100 98 100 100 98 99 98
Mar '17 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Dec '16 98 99 98 97 97 99 98 97
Sep '16 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
NOT AWARE Sep '17 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jun '17 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 2
Mar '17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dec '16 2 1 2 3 3 1 2 3
Sep '16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Q. M ay narinig, nabasa o napanood na po ba kayo tungkol sa kampanya laban sa iligal na droga ng kasalukuyang administrasyon?

Support for the Duterte administration’s “war on drugs” is the majority sentiment
among Filipinos (88%). Basically the same levels of support obtain across geographic
areas and socio-economic groupings (84% to 94% and 80% to 89%, respectively). Only
2% of Filipinos are not supportive of the campaign while 9% are unable to say if they
support or do not support the same. Less than 1% of Filipinos are unable to state their
position on the matter, even in terms of indecision. (Please refer to Table 2.)

5
 Table 2
WHETHER OR NOT RESPONDENT SUPPORTS THE CAMPAIGN
AGAINST ILLEGAL DRUGS OF THE DUTERTE ADMINISTRATION
September 24 - 30, 2017 / Philippines
(In Percent)

Base: Aware of anti-illegal drugs campaign

Do you support or not support the LOCATION CLASS

campaign against illegal drugs of the BAL
administration of President Duterte? RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E
SUPPORT 88 84 88 85 94 80 89 88
Truly support 41 32 33 41 62 43 40 45
Support 47 51 55 44 32 37 50 43
MAY SUPPORT/MAY NOT SUPPORT 9 11 10 12 5 17 8 9
NOT SUPPORT 2 5 2 2 2 1 2 3
Not support 2 4 2 1 1 1 2 2
Truly not support 0.5 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
DON'T KNOW 0.4 1 0 1 0 2 0 1

Q42. Kayo po ba ay sumusuporta o hindi sumusuporta sa kampanya laban sa iligal na droga ng administrasyon ni Presidente Duterte?
Note: Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off or to Don't Know and Refuse responses.

The majority sentiment among Filipinos (73%) is that extrajudicial killings are
occurring in the conduct of the Duterte administration’s “war on drugs”; between
June and September 2017, agreement with this view becomes slightly more
pronounced (+6 percentage points) while disagreement eases markedly (-9
percentage points)

As regards the allegation that extrajudicial killings (EJKs) are taking place in the
course of the administration’s implementation of its “war on drugs”, 73% of Filipinos
believe this to be true – a view echoed by majorities in all areas and classes (67% to
78% and 70% to 77%, respectively). On the other hand, 20% of Filipinos do not believe
EJKs are happening in the implementation of the anti-illegal drugs campaign. Almost
one (1) in 10 Filipinos (7%) refused to answer the question. (Please refer to Table 3.)

6
 Table 3
WHETHER OR NOT RESPONDENT BELIEVES THAT EJKs ARE HAPPENING
June and September 2017 / Philippines
(In Percent)

Base: Aware of anti-illegal drugs campaign

Extrajudicial killings or EJK are killings done by people in authority such as the police or soldiers
that do not follow the rule of law.
There are allegations that in implementing the campaign against illegal drugs, EJKs occurred.
In response, the administration says there are no EJKs and if there were any deaths, these
are due to unidentified assailants who are being pursued by the authorities.

Do you believe or not believe that

extrajudicial killings or EJK are LOCATION CLASS
happening in the implementation of BAL
the campaign against illegal drugs? RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

Believe Sep'17 73 78 75 68 67 77 72 70
Jun'17 67 67 72 74 50 78 65 66
Not believe Sep'17 20 17 16 20 29 17 20 23
Jun'17 29 28 25 22 44 20 30 29
Refused to answer Sep'17 7 5 8 12 4 6 8 7
Jun'17 4 5 4 4 5 2 4 5

ANG EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLINGS O EJK AY ANG PAGPATAY NA GINAGAWA NG M GA AWTORIDAD TULAD NG M GA PULIS O SUNDALO
NANG HINDI SINUSUNOD ANG BATAS.
M AY M GA ALEGASYON NA SA PAGSASAKATUPARAN NG KAM PANYA LABAN SA ILIGAL NA DROGA AY M AY M GA NAGANAP NA EJK.
BILANG TUGON, SINASABI NG ADM INISTRASYON NA WALANG NAM ATAY DAHIL SA EJK, AT KUNG M AYROON M ANG M GA NAM ATAY,
ITO AY DAHIL SA M GA DI KILALANG SALARIN NA TINUTUGIS NG M GA AWTORIDAD.
Q. Naniniwala po ba kayo o hindi naniniwala na may nangyayaring extrajudicial killings o EJK sa pagsasakatuparan ng kampanya laban sa
iligal na droga?
Note: Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off.

During the period June to September 2017, there is a decline in the percentage of Filipinos
who do not believe EJKs are occurring in the conduct of the administration’s anti-illegal
drugs campaign. Similar movements are registered in Mindanao (-15 percentage points)
and in Class D (-10 percentage points). And while the increase in the percentage of
Filipinos who believe the allegation that EJKs are taking place in the implementation of
the “war on drugs” falls short of being considered significant (+6 percentage points), a
notable increase is recorded in Mindanao (+17 percentage points).

Nearly all Filipinos know about the case of Kian delos Santos (94%), with most of them
(76%) expressing concern that they or someone they know may meet the same fate
because of the “war on drugs”

At the national level and across geographic areas and socio-economic classes, at least nine
(9) in 10 Filipinos have heard, read, or watched something about the killing of Kian delos
Santos last 16 August 2017 (90% to 98%). More than three-quarters of those aware of this
case (76%) admit being worried that they, a member of their family, a relative, or an
acquaintance may experience the same fate as delos Santos due to the implementation of
the administration’s anti-illegal drugs campaign. This sentiment is shared by big
majorities in each geographic area and socio-economic class (74% to 84% and 71% to 81%,
respectively). Of the total figure of 76%, 43% are very worried about the possibility of this
happening to them or someone they know while 34% are somewhat worried. Around the
same percentages of Filipinos are either ambivalent on the matter (13%) or are not worried
(11%). (Please refer to Table 4.)

7
 Table 4
KIAN DELOS SANTOS
September 24 - 30, 2017 / Philippines
(In Percent)

On the eve of August 16, 2017, while the members of Northern Police District in Brgy. 160 in Caloocan
City were conducting an operation against illegal drugs, 17-year old Kian delos Santos was taken and
was repeatedly shot in an alley after allegedly resisting arrest.

Many expressed outrage over this incident because the police report is different from the CCTV
footage and statements of witnesses.

Two days after delos Santos's burial last August 26, his parents met with President Duterte.
The President vowed to bring justice to delos Santos' death if the police are proven guilty.

Have you heard, read or watched LOCATION CLASS

anything about this or not? BAL
(Base: Total Interviews, 100%) RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E
Aware 94 98 96 91 90 97 94 90
Not aware 6 2 4 9 10 3 6 10

How concerned/worried are you that what

happened to Kian delos Santos and others
similar to him may happen to you, any
member of your family, your relatives
or acquaintances because of the
operations against illegal drugs?
Would you say that you are... ?
(Base: Aware of what happened to Kian, 94%)

WORRIED 76 77 74 84 75 81 77 71
Very worried 43 42 34 61 46 34 45 39
Somewhat worried 34 35 40 24 28 47 32 32
MAY BE WORRIED/
13 8 18 10 8 9 14 13
MAY BE NOT WORRIED
NOT WORRIED 11 15 8 6 17 9 10 16
Somewhat not worried 6 7 6 3 7 5 5 9
Not worried at all 5 8 2 3 10 4 4 8

Noong gabi ng Agosto 16, 2017, habang nagsasagawa ng operasyon laban sa iligal na droga ang mga miyembro ng Northern Police District sa
Brgy. 160 sa lungsod ng Caloocan, ay dinampot ang 17-anyos na si Kian delos Santos at pinagbabaril sa isang eskinita matapos umano itong
manlaban.
M araming kumondena sa insidenteng ito dahil iba ang nakasaad sa police report at ang nakuhanang pangyayari ng CCTV sa lugar at mga
pahayag ng mga testigo.

Dalawang araw matapos ilibing si delos Santos noong Agosto 26 ay nakipagpulong ang kanyang mga magulang kay Presidente Duterte.
Ipinangako ng Presidente na mabibigyan ng hustisya ang pagkamatay ni delos Santos kung mapatunayang nagkasala ang mga pulis.
Q48. M ay narinig, nabasa o napanood na po ba kayo tungkol dito o wala pa?
Q49. Kayo po ba ay nababahala/nangangamba na maaring mangyari sa inyo, sa sinumang miyembro ng inyong pamilya, kamag-anak o kakilala
ang sinapit ni Kian delos Santos at iba pang napaslang dala ng operasyon laban sa iligal na droga? M asasabi ba niyong kayo ay... ?
Notes: (1) % WORRIED = % Very worried plus % Somewhat worried; % NOT WORRIED = % Somewhat worried plus % Not at all worried
(2) Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off.

8
Most Filipinos (58%) say the leaders of the Catholic Church should help with the
rehabilitation of drug addicts

A small majority of Filipinos (58%) would like the leaders of the Catholic Church to assist
with the rehabilitation of drug addicts as part of the administration’s “war on drugs”. This
is the preferred action of most Filipinos across areas and classes (53% to 64% and 54% to
60%, respectively). Around the same percentages of Filipinos say the leaders of the
Catholic Church should either monitor the conduct of the anti-illegal drugs campaign
(46%) or release statements expressing their concern about the deaths that have taken
place as a result of the campaign (40%). Both options have the support of most Visayans
(51% and 52%, respectively). (Please refer to Table 5.)

The third most often mentioned action among Filipinos is for the Catholic Church
leadership to assist in litigating alleged abusive law enforcers (28%). Only about one (1)
in 10 Filipinos would like for the latter to take a hands-off policy when it comes to the
“war on drugs” (13%) or to embark on an international campaign to exert pressure on the
Duterte administration to suspend “Oplan Tokhang” (11%).

Table 5
ACTIONS LEADERS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SHOULD TAKE
IN RESPONSE TO THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST ILLEGAL DRUGS
September 24 - 30, 2017 / Philippines
(In Percent)

Base: Aware of anti-illegal drugs campaign, 100%

What should the leaders of the LOCATION CLASS

Catholic Church do about the BAL
campaign against illegal drugs? RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

Help with rehabilitation of 58 64 56 53 61 54 58 60

drug addicts
Observe/Monitor the campaign 46 46 45 51 45 37 48 44
against illegal drugs
Release statements expressing 40 33 44 52 28 27 43 36
concern about the deaths
associated with the campaign
Assist in litigation against alleged 28 26 32 23 26 26 28 30
abusive law enforcers
They should not interfere with 13 5 12 13 18 13 13 11
the government’s program
International campaign to pressure 11 11 17 7 4 13 12 7
the Duterte administration to
suspend Oplan Tokhang

Q47. Ano po ang nararapat gawin ng mga pinuno ng Simbahang Katoliko sa kampanya laban sa iligal na droga?
Note: Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off.

Almost eight (8) in 10 Filipinos (77%) are aware of anti-illegal drug operations
conducted in their barangay in the past year; most of them characterize these operations
as orderly (86%) and report awareness of someone being either arrested (69%) or having
surrendered (82%) in the course of these operations

9
A huge majority of Filipinos (77%) know of anti-illegal drugs operations in their barangay
conducted by the police or local government authorities in the previous year. Majority
levels of awareness are posted across areas and classes (65% to 88% and 75% to 81%,
respectively). Awareness is more marked in Metro Manila and Mindanao (83% to 88%)
than in the Visayas (65%). Non-awareness is reported by 21% of Filipinos while 2%
refused to answer the survey probe. These figures are consistent with those recorded by
Pulse Asia Research in June 2017. The only exception is the decline in the level of
awareness in the Visayas (-16 percentage points). (Please refer to Table 6.)

In the opinion of most of those aware of anti-illegal drug operations in their barangay in
the past year (86%), these operations were conducted in an orderly manner – an
assessment shared by majorities across geographic areas and socio-economic classes (71%
to 91% and 86%, respectively). There are no significant changes between the June 2017
and September 2017 figures. In contrast, 11% of those aware of such operations in their
barangay describe these as violent. Agreement with this view ranges from 8% in the rest
of Luzon and Mindanao to 25% in Metro Manila and from 10% in Class D to 14% in Class
ABC. Between June and September 2017, the percentage of those saying these operations
were violent goes down in Class D (-8 percentage points). Meanwhile, 3% of those aware
of such operations refused to share their assessment of the manner by which these
operations were carried out.

In those areas where anti-illegal drug operations were conducted in the previous year,
82% say there were people who surrendered to the authorities while 69% report
awareness of people being arrested. Majorities in the different areas and classes are aware
of people either being arrested (64% to 73% and 63% to 70%, respectively) or surrendering
to the authorities (67% to 92% and 74% to 86%, respectively). Additionally, 21% of those
aware of anti-illegal drug operations in their barangay know of someone either being
killed (21%) or injured (14%) in the conduct of such operations. Higher levels of awareness
of people being injured are recorded in Metro Manila and the Visayas (22% to 25%) than
in the rest of Luzon (6%) while awareness of deaths related to these operations is more
pronounced in Metro Manila (40%) than in the other areas (15% to 20%).

Between June and September 2017, there is a slight increase in the overall level of
awareness of people being arrested/injured/killed or having surrendered in the conduct
of the anti-illegal drug operations across the country (+6 percentage points). Across areas
and classes, the following changes may be noted: (1) in the rest of Luzon, there is a decline
in the level of awareness of people being injured (-17 percentage points); (2) in the Visayas,
there is an increase in the percentage of those who know of someone suffering injuries
due to the operations (+12 percentage points); and (3) in the rest of Luzon, there is a drop
in the level of awareness of deaths resulting from the anti-illegal drug campaign in their
area (-15 percentage points).

Non-awareness of any of these developments is reported by basically the same

percentages in June and September 2017 (9% and 4%, respectively). Refusal to answer is
recorded at 2% and 1% for the same survey periods.

10
 Table 6
ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUG OPERATIONS
June and September 2017 / Philippines
(In Percent)

This past year, have there been

anti-illegal drug operations conducted
by the police or local government in LOCATION CLASS
your barangay? BAL
(Base: Aware of anti-illegal drug campaign) RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

Yes Sep '17 77 83 74 65 88 81 75 81

Jun '17 82 77 83 81 85 84 82 82
None Sep '17 21 16 26 27 12 18 23 18
Jun '17 17 20 16 18 14 16 17 16
Refused to answer Sep '17 2 1 0 8 0 1 2 1
Jun '17 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1

In general, what is your observation

regarding the anti-illegal drug
operation? Was it…
(Base: Those whose barangay had anti-illegal drug operations)

Orderly Sep '17 86 71 90 83 91 86 86 86

Jun '17 81 77 80 77 88 73 80 87
Violent Sep '17 11 25 8 12 8 14 10 12
Jun '17 17 20 19 18 12 24 18 12
Refused to answer Sep '17 3 4 2 6 1 0 3 2
Jun '17 2 3 2 5 0 2 2 1

To your knowledge, were there

people ARRESTED, WHO SURRENDERED,
INJURED OR KILLED in this operation?
(Base: Those whose barangay had anti-illegal drug operations)

SEPTEMBER 2017
Yes, there were 95 92 96 92 97 97 95 94
Arrested 69 73 68 64 69 63 70 68
Surrendered 82 67 82 83 92 74 83 86
Injured 14 25 6 22 16 12 12 23
Killed 21 40 15 20 19 19 20 25
None 4 7 4 7 3 3 4 6
Refused to answer 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

JUNE 2017
Yes, there were 89 86 87 87 96 91 88 92
Arrested 65 66 62 69 66 69 65 62
Surrendered 77 70 74 76 89 70 78 79
Injured 19 23 23 10 18 21 21 13
Killed 29 32 30 23 30 42 28 26
None 9 13 11 10 4 6 10 8
Refused to answer 2 2 2 3 0 3 2 0

Q. Nitong nakaraang taon, mayroon po bang naisagawa ang mga pulis o lokal na pamahalaan na operasyon laban sa iligal na droga sa
inyong barangay?
Q. Sa pangkabuuan, ano po ang inyong obserbasyon sa isinagawang operasyon laban sa iligal na droga. Ito po ba ay …?
Q. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, mayroon bang NAARESTO, SUM UKO, NASUGATAN O NAPATAY sa operasyong naganap?
Note: Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off.

11