Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
has played important dietary and medicinal roles throughout the history.
the ancient Egyptians. There is some evidence that during the earliest
Olympics in Greece, garlic was fed to the athletes for increasing stamina
Metro Manila, Laguna, cities of Baguio, Cebu, Cagayan de Oro and Davao.
In Nueva Ecija, native garlic were distributed within the province and some
were retailed by transient buyers from Bulacan and Metro Manila. Metro
estimated at almost the same level at P8.00 per kilogram. In the demand
areas, Metro Manila was noted with the highest cost per kilogram (P13.17),
followed by Cebu City (P11.97) and the lowest average cost was in Naga
City (P5.65). Net margins were highest for retailers in Nueva Ecija at
P41.90 per kilogram. Such was due to direct buying of commodity from
Norte at P2.22 per kilogram. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate
how much will be the marketing cost in selling Garlic and it’s net revenue.
a. Age;
b. Civil Status;
c. Sex;
d. Educational Attainment;
a. Sources of Supply;
e. Frequency of Display?
a. Buying Cost;
c. Transportation;
d. Labor; and
e. Fixed cost?
of net revenue?
profile?
practices?
pricing.
services about the marketing strategies that might be helpful to the Garlic
Vendors.
Garlic Vendors in the major Public Markets of Davao City in terms of net
The subject locale of the study are the major public markets of
Toril Public Markets. Sixty (60) garlic vendor are the respondents of the
study.
Definition of Terms
The following terms were defined operationally as they are used in the
study.
display.
cash or credit.
Net Revenue refers to the profit from selling Garlic after deducting
vendors in valuing the Garlic being sold. In this study, it refers to mark-
Garlic.
female
7
Vendors refers to the seller of the commodity. They are the subject
Chapter 2
This chapter includes the related literature and studies, theory base
height. Garlic is easy to grow and can be grown in mild climates. There are
from alliin (for example, allicin). Conventionally, it has been used to treat
(Rivlrn, 1998). In the medieval period, garlic was also played an important
growth habit, garlic resembles the onion. Besides onion, garlic is the most
important bulb crop grown almost all-over South Asia. It is widely used for
flavoring and seasoning dishes, pickles and sauces. Large amount of garlic
More people are discovering its culinary splendor, and producers have
et al., 2012).
2013).
Sliced draw garlic stored in 15-20% ethanol for more than 1.5 year is
along with onions, chives, and shallots (Iciek et al., 2009; Lanzotti, 2006).
Due to the chemical complexity of garlic and the use of different processing
safety.
In some Western countries, the sale of garlic preparations ranks with those
garlic and its preparations. These effects have been largely attributed to i)
consumption has soared in the United States. Americans ate 2.3 pounds
of garlic per person in 2010. Foodies are eager to try new and colorful
gourmet garlic varieties. As people learn more about the health benefits of
garlic they are demanding more of this tasty allium. In 2011, US garlic
import market for fresh garlic and shipped in 164.4 million pounds of fresh
garlic in 2011 (from USDA FAS 2011). There is a lot of room for domestic
garlic production.
on a small scale for local markets and, particularly in the U.S., by a few
large-scale producers for processing and fresh sales. About one million
hectares (2.5 million acres) of garlic produce about 10 million metric tons
of garlic globally each year, according to the United Nations Food and
than the year before - this figure reflects total revenue of producers and
the value of the global garlic market indicated an upward trend over the
period from 2007 to 2016, however, the trend pattern was not consistent
One niche market that has grown tremendously is garlic. From the
1992, New York’s Garlic crop has grown to 240 garlic farms and 265 acres
must be harvested by hand. As new crops like garlic gain popularity among
cutting the scapes (curly-cue tops) in mid-July offers the flavor of real
garlic in another form several weeks before the season's bulbs are ready.
So, they begin teaching the garlic fans shopping at market to use scapes
as garlic, too. Scapes can be cut up just like scallions to add real garlic
flavor to any dish where you would use garlic cloves. Extra scapes can be
chopped and frozen for later use. The Chinese are already accustomed to
using them as tsuan tie. Koreans know them as manil chong. We offer them
at market with anywhere from ten to twenty in a bunch for a dollar. They
want to know what they are. This provides a lead-in to explaining them,
and we always ask people to taste them before using them, because they
are not like garlic---they are garlic. "Think cloves, not chives."
market research to allow for market penetration as can be seen from the
coca cola example given, originality and quality concept are key to coming
15
the primary aspects of effective market practices that one should not do
without. Other aspects are also important and they include being clarity
of the product, striving to make consumers happy with the aim of growing
the company but avoid developing the company for the sake of its own
development and trying to show the consumer that you are not selfish,
while you mean it, but being humanistic and concerned about the
Essays, 2018).
Pricing methods are the methods that firms use to calculate the
encountered by the firms as the prices should not only be relevant as per
the current market scenario but should also meet the expenses of the firm
and help it gain profit. It must also take into account competitor’s pricing.
2008).
sell garlic at around $2.00 per pound, while some organic grocers sell
16
can go as high as $1.00 or more per bulb for specialty varieties. At the
boxes; 3-pound ropes and braids; and cases of 48 2-bulb boxes (Ford,
2015).
monitoring, there was an increase of P20 for native garlic (Sunstar, 2015).
Traders may have manipulated the prices of garlic in the market that
resulted in the sudden increase of garlic at P280 per kilo in the market in
the past few weeks. “There is really manipulation because the cost of garlic
pesos per kilo with duty. How can P 17 and 40 pesos per kilo can go up to
P 280 per kilo?,” Villar said. The Philippines produces only eight percent
of the garlic supply in the market while the rest is being imported.
“The prices are too high. If you sell it at P 100 per kilo, that’s
understandable but P 280 per kilo is too much,” said Villar, who is unable
not want to take responsibility for the garlic price increase. (Mendez,
2014).
this time, whether the product will be sourced from the domestic market
Every day, we carry out various payments in different contexts and with
different methods. For most part of the 1900s, cash and checks were the
current deposits, often more easily than could be done with checks
(Schreft, S. 2006).
Transaction stipulates that the purchaser must pay for the goods when
index theory is built on the assumption that this ideal pricing method is
and especially in that of SPPI, stray from this ideal. The closer a pricing
convey difficulties that are specific for services, so they do not deviate from
food stores display daily, others only once a week. The size of the total
purchase, the number of items and the quantity of each item bought all
store, the more is that customer exposed to the impact of sales promotional
devices used in the store. Store operations must be geared to mesh with
must keep on schedule with it. Merchandise must be available in the store
knows from experience that his volume of sales is not uniform by days of
19
the week, nor by hours of the day. The variations are very pronounced,
to sell its products, the volume and profitability of its sales depend on
the balance between supply and demand. Clearly sales cannot exceed
production on the one hand nor demand on the other, and of these two
will depend on what action is taken with regard to prices, quality and
selling effort. These three are the business firm's parameters of action.
the present century until the 1930s, price was the predominant
and in the consumer market it has dominated until recent years. Right
becomes the investor’s cost basis for calculating gain or loss when selling
charges paid for the investment, and the weighted average cost is used for
parts, and small tools and devices). Materials and supplies include also
office supplies and packaging any short term goods or material which is
different locations. Managing the material flows from raw materials and
products and services. In return, laborers receive a wage to buy the goods
and services they don't produce themselves. Those without desired skills
or abilities often don't even get paid a living wage. A living wage calculator
shows the hourly rate needed to pay for typical basic costs in a given
location.(Amadeo, K. 2018).
21
throughout the relevant range and are usually considered sunk for the
actual rent paid by the tenant or rental value of owned land, interest on
fixed capital excluding land, land revenue, cesses, taxes and depreciation
of implements and machinery.. It is constant over time and does not vary
with the changes in the levels of output. This cost exists even in the
price mark-up and place of source of the product. However, the difference
are highly correlated with their marketing costs. The positive results imply
that the higher the amount allotted for marketing costs, connotes higher
22
revenue.
23
Theory Base
your product or services over your competitor. Marketing are all the
attempted to find out if marketing practices and marketing costs affect the
Conceptual Framework
fixed costs.
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
• Age
• Sex
• Civil Status
• Educational Attainment
• Source of Financing
• Length of Experience
DEPENDENT VARIABLES
MARKETING PRACTICES
• Sources of Supply
• Mode of Delivery in MARKETING PERFORMANCE
Buying • Net Revenue
• Mode of Payment in
Buying
• Pricing Method
• Frequency of Display
MARKETING COSTS
• Buying Cost
• Supplies and Materials
• Transportation
• Labor
• Fixed Cost
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
statistical treatment.
Research Design
between two or more variables. Researchers collect data for these variables
Sources of Data
The primary data were obtained from the responses of the Garlic
market vendors in Davao City as the source of information for the study.
Sampling Technique
selected from the N units in the population in such a way that every
Part III contains the marketing cost in terms of buying cost, supplies
selling price.
comments and suggestion. After the several changes were made and
integrated the final revision was done, then the first three chapters of the
the local officials to gather data needed for the study from the vendors in
their locality. After the approval, the researcher distributed the Survey
survey. After the questionnaires retrieval, the data were then tabulated,
Statistical Treatment
interpretation of data:
practices.
Chapter 4
the study.
Demographic Profile
age. Of the 60 respondents, there are 11.7 percent on the ages 18-27 years
old, 28.3 percent are 28-37 years old, 25 percent of the respondents are
38-47 years old and 35 percent are 48 years old and above. This indicates
that most of the garlic vendors are relatively matured and belong to the
Table 1
Sex. The data on Table 2 reveals that out of the total 60 respondents,
18.3 percent of them are male and 81.7 percent are female. Therefore,
Table 2
single, 56.7 percent are married, 5 percent are separated, 8.3 percent are
Table 3
percent of the respondents are college, 61.7 percent are high school, 9
Table 4
from other sources. It indicates that majority of the respondents have self-
Table 5
13.3 percent have 7-9 years’ experience and 35 percent have 10 years and
Table 6
Marketing Practices
according to their source of supply. It shows that 16.7 percent get their
supply from wholesalers and 83.3 percent sourced it from the retailers. It
appears that majority of the vendors procure their supply of garlic from
the retailers.
Table 7
Table 8
the 100 percent of the respondents paid the commodity through cash.
Table 9
Table 10
Table 11
Marketing Cost
reveals that the buying cost, supplies and materials, transportation, labor
and fixed cost has a mean of 20,336.33, 89.63, 82.36, 26.57 and 278.14
Table 12
Marketing Performance
Table 13 reflects the net revenue of garlic vendors. It reveals that the
net revenue has a mean and standard deviation of 7,539.88 and 10,664.98
business.
Table 13
a significant value of 0.045 which is lower than 0.05. It shows that female
Table 14
variations.
frequency of display since all the respondents have uniform answers pick-
Table 15
presented in Table 16, results revealed that all the indicators of marketing
fixed costs (r=0.523) with their P-values of 0.000, 0.003, 0.014, 0.002 and
0.000; respectively.
This conforms to the study of Adame (2010), which shows that the
are highly correlated with their marketing costs. The positive results imply
that the higher the amount allotted for marketing costs, connotes higher
revenue.
Table 16
Chapter 5
Summary
data were gathered from 60 garlic vendors with the use of a survey
are on ages 48 years old and above, dominated with female, married, with
high school education, provided their own capital for business and have
majority of the respondents sourced their supply from retailer, pick-up the
commodity for cash, adopted cost-based pricing method and display the
vary significantly.
buying cost, supplies and materials, transportation, labor and fixed cost.
performance.
45
Conclusions
were drawn:
supply.
hypothesis is rejected.
46
Recommendations
and helping them cope up with the possible changes in price brought
REFERENCES
Agricultural News. (2018). Key insights into the global garlic market.
Retrieved on February 21, 2019 from
https://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/1/358/176266.html
Noble D.A. 2005. Farmers, commerce, and urban design: The spatial and
institutional constitution of the farmers market in Central Indiana.
Retrieved on April 12, 2019 from
http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/inpho/docs/Post_Har
vest_Compendium_-_Garlic.pdf
Ried K, Frank OR, Stocks NP. (2013). Aged garlic extract reduces blood
pressure in hypertensives: a dose-response trial. Retrieved on
February 11, 2019 from Eur J Clin Nutr.a;67:64–70.
USDA FAS. (2011). How to Market Garlic. Retrieved on February 23, 2019
from http://greyduckgarlic.com/how-to-market-garlic.html
51
Appendix A
LETTER OF PERMISSION
_________________
_________________
_________________
Sir/Madam,
Greetings of Peace!
Rest assured that the data collected will be treated with utmost
confidentiality and will be used for academic purposes only.
Appendix B
________________
________________
________________
Sir/Madam:
Greetings of Peace!
In connection to this, I would like to ask for your cooperation and support
by supplying the data needed in the study through filling-up the survey
questionnaire.
Respectfully yours,
RUBELINE M. BANGUNAN
Researcher
Noted by:
APPENDIX C
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions: Please supply or put a check (on the space provided in every
item which best describes your response and kindly fill out the necessary
information on the space given below.
Thank you for your valuable time and effort in answering this
questionnaire you’re highly appreciated.
55
Appendix D
LIST OF RESPONDENTS
Appendix E
STATISTICAL OUTPUT
Age
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 18-27 7 11.7 11.7 11.7
28-37 17 28.3 28.3 40.0
38-47 15 25.0 25.0 65.0
48- and above 21 35.0 35.0 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Sex
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid male 11 18.3 18.3 18.3
female 49 81.7 81.7 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
civil status
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Single 15 25.0 25.0 25.0
Married 34 56.7 56.7 81.7
Separated 3 5.0 5.0 86.7
Widow 5 8.3 8.3 95.0
live in partner
3 5.0 5.0 100.0
Educational attainment
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid college 11 18.3 18.3 18.3
HS 37 61.7 61.7 80.0
elementary 9 15.0 15.0 95.0
others 3 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Source of Financing
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid self financing 36 60.0 60.0 60.0
credit from micro
12 20.0 20.0 80.0
financing
credit from coop 3 5.0 5.0 85.0
others 9 15.0 15.0 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Marketing Practices
Sources of Supply
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid wholesaler
10 16.7 16.7 16.7
Mode of Delivery
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid pick up
60 100.0 100.0 100.0
Mode of Payment
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid cash 60 100.0 100.0 100.0
Pricing Method
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid cost based
60 100.0 100.0 100.0
Frequency of Display
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 7.00 60 100.0 100.0 100.0
59
Marketing Cost
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation
buying_cost 60 20336.3333 27436.53002
suppliesandmaterials 60 89.6277 240.03497
transportation 58 82.3581 123.25657
labor 47 26.5691 58.97670
fixed_cost 60 278.1405 520.15305
total_cost 60 20853.4485 28067.05986
Valid N (listwise) 47
Marketing Performance
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation
net_revenue 60 7539.8848 10664.97699
Valid N (listwise) 60
Descriptive
net_revenue
95% Confidence
Std. Interval for Mean
Deviatio Std. Lower Upper Maximu
N Mean n Error Bound Bound Minimum m
1.00 7 15688.235 17055.9 6446.55 -85.9242 31462.3 244.91 44540.9
7 9007 830 956 2
2.00 17 7070.0935 8246.62 2000.10 2830.06 11310.1 631.67 26240.0
622 064 96 175 0
3.00 15 5502.8773 7161.54 1849.10 1536.94 9468.80 90.67 28689.6
408 273 64 83 3
4.00 21 6659.0805 11428.3 2493.86 1456.97 11861.1 95.00 40766.6
1916 370 20 890 7
Total 60 7539.8848 10664.9 1376.84 4784.82 10294.9 90.67 44540.9
7699 261 91 405 2
ANOVA
net_revenue
Sum of
Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Between 547054456.28 3 182351485.4 1.657 .187
Groups 4 28
Within Groups 6163707857.1 56 110066211.7
81 35
Total 6710762313.4 59
65
Net Revenue
Age
Subset for alpha = 0.05
age N 1
3.00 15 5502.8773
4.00 21 6659.0805
2.00 17 7070.0935
1.00 7 15688.2357
61
Levene's Test
for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Sig. Std. Confidence
(2- Mean Error Interval of the
taile Differ Differe Difference
F Sig. t df d) ence nce Lower Upper
net_revenue Equal 10.89 .002 2.04 58 .045 7096. 3465.7 158.74 14033.
variances 4 8 2230 6173 718 69887
assumed 2
Equal 1.39 11.2 .189 7096. 5071.4 - 18222.
variances 9 95 2230 6887 4030.5 96632
not 2 2027
assumed
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 12.660.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type
I error levels are not guaranteed.
Group Statistics
Std. Std. Error
sex N Mean Deviation Mean
net_revenue 1.00 11 13335.1336 16312.35364 4918.35968
2.00 49 6238.9106 8657.20478 1236.74354
62
Descriptives
net_revenue
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Std. Lower Upper Minimu Maximu
N Mean Deviation Std. Error Bound Bound m m
1.00 15 9521.6180 12911.1397 3333.641 2371.667 16671.56 90.67 44540.9
3 94 1 89 2
2.00 34 8520.9550 10855.5182 1861.706 4733.285 12308.62 366.37 40766.6
0 01 6 44 7
3.00 3 1692.9833 2359.90001 1362.488 - 7555.300 244.91 4416.13
91 4169.333 0
3
4.00 5 1990.6240 2213.76866 990.0274 - 4739.380 95.00 5114.67
4 758.1328 8
5.00 3 1608.0933 1367.08149 789.2848 - 5004.112 488.15 3131.50
7 1787.925 0
4
Total 60 7539.8848 10664.9769 1376.842 4784.829 10294.94 90.67 44540.9
9 61 1 05 2
ANOVA
net_revenue
Mean
Sum of Squares df Square F Sig.
Between 453722651.636 4 113430662. .997 .417
Groups 909
Within 6257039661.829 55 113764357.
Groups 488
Total 6710762313.465 59
63
net_revenue
Descriptives
Education
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Std. Std. Lower Upper Minimu Maxim
N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound m um
1.00 2957.39 4019.063 1211.79 5657.438 13919.
11 257.3520 95.00
55 34 319 9 44
2.00 8919.11 11183.02 1838.47 5190.506 12647.71 44540.
37 90.67
19 266 760 5 73 92
3.00 -
6928.37 13106.11 4368.70 17002.62 40766.
9 3145.877 244.91
11 116 372 00 67
7
4.00 -
9166.42 13420.78 7748.49 42505.50 24653.
3 24172.66 939.25
00 588 434 03 34
03
Tot 7539.88 10664.97 1376.84 4784.829 10294.94 44540.
60 90.67
al 48 699 261 1 05 92
64
Descriptives
net_revenue
95% Confidence
Std. Interval for Mean
Deviatio Std. Lower Upper Maximu
N Mean n Error Bound Bound Minimum m
1.00 36 9954.61 12252.9 2042.1 5808.79 14100.4 244.91 44540.9
19 9678 6613 43 296 2
2.00 12 3712.98 8029.94 2318.0 - 8814.96 90.67 28723.8
42 186 4455 1388.99 58 0
75
3.00 3 2591.68 1649.82 952.52 - 6690.07 1204.63 4416.13
00 488 684 1506.71 22
22
4.00 9 4632.91 5075.89 1691.9 731.230 8534.59 366.37 13919.4
22 901 6634 9 36 4
Tota 60 7539.88 10664.9 1376.8 4784.82 10294.9 90.67 44540.9
l 48 7699 4261 91 405 2
net_revenue
Sources of Finance
Subset for alpha = 0.05
source_finance N 1
3.00 3 2591.6800
2.00 12 3712.9842
4.00 9 4632.9122
1.00 36 9954.6119
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.200.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type
I error levels are not guaranteed.
65
Descriptives
net_revenue
95% Confidence
Std. Interval for Mean
Deviatio Std. Lower Upper Minim
N Mean n Error Bound Bound um Maximum
1.00 15 5066.02 7059.68 1822.8 1156.50 8975.54 244.91 28689.63
53 370 0249 28 79
2.00 16 13333.3 13814.0 3453.5 5972.34 20694.2 95.00 40766.67
144 1260 0315 67 821
3.00 8 6076.12 7853.41 2776.6 - 12641.7 763.57 24653.34
50 554 0169 489.494 447
7
4.00 21 5450.50 9952.99 2171.9 919.961 9981.05 90.67 44540.92
86 026 2054 7 54
Tota 60 7539.88 10664.9 1376.8 4784.82 10294.9 90.67 44540.92
l 48 7699 4261 91 405
ANOVA
net_revenue
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Between 737637025.2 3 245879008.4 2.305 .087
Groups 92 31
Within 5973125288. 56 106662951.5
Groups 173 75
Total 6710762313. 59
465
66
net_revenue
Marketing Experience
Marketing Subset for alpha = 0.05
experience N 1
1.00 15 5066.0253
4.00 21 5450.5086
3.00 8 6076.1250
2.00 16 13333.3144
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 13.254.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used.
Type I error levels are not guaranteed.
ANOVA
net_revenue
Sum of Mean
Squares Df Square F Sig.
Between 312677578. 104225859.
3 .912 .441
Groups 536 512
Within Groups 6398084734 114251513.
56
.929 124
Total 6710762313
59
.465
N 60 60 58 47 60 60
N 60 60 58 47 60 60
N 58 58 58 47 58 58
N 47 47 47 47 47 47
N 60 60 58 47 60 60
Appendix F
Documentation
70
71
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL INFORMATION
VOLUNTEER/WORK EXPERIENCE
STUDIES CONDUCTED