Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TYPES OF MODALITY
1. Abstract:
Modality in languages can be grammatically addressed by two means: the modal system and
mood (Palmer, 1986). This paper only examines the former means, seeking to classify sentences
or clauses (most of them) with modality in Chapter XV– Nest Building, in the novel, Secret
Garden and evaluate the equivalence of the translation of the modality from English to
Vietnamese.
The texts (English and Vietnamese versions) have been attached for reference.
2. Theoretical backgrounds
2.1. Definition of modality
According to Bybee (1985), modality is what the speaker’s doing with the whole proposition
while Palmer (1986), it is the semantic information associated with the speaker’s attitude or
opinion about what is said. More clearly, Saeed (2003) states that modality, a semantic category
operating at the sentence level, is a cover term for devices for speakers to express varying
degrees of commitment or belief in a proposition.
2.2. Types of modality
The following is Palmer’s categorization of modality in the modal system.
There are two types of modality: propositional and event modality. Propositional modality
includes two types, epistemic and evidential, which deal with the speaker’s attitude towards the
truth-value or the factual status of the proposition.Event modality, however, refers to events that
are not actualized and events that have not taken place. There are two major types, deontic and
dynamic modality.
2.2.1. Epistemic
With epistemic modality, speakers express their judgment about the factual status of the
proposition or signal their degrees of knowledge.
In English, there are three kinds of epistemic modality: Speculative, Deductive and Assumptive.
Take the following sentences for examples:
John may be in his office. (Speculative)
2
2.2.3. Deontic
With deontic modality, the conditioning factors are external to the relevant individual, relating to
the obligation and permission coming from external sources, for example,
John may/can come in now. (Permission) (Permissive)
John must come in now. (Obligation) (Obligative)
Although deontic modality comes from the external sources such as laws and rules, the authority
can come from the speaker, who puts the obligation on the listener.
Another type of deontic modality is Commisive, in which the conditioning factor for the action
lies with the speaker, for example:
You shall/will have it tomorrow.
Some past tense forms can be used to weaken the degree of the modality. Must has ought to and
shoud, can and may have could and might.
For past events, might and could cannot be used to deontically but should/ought to + [HAVE +
past participle] while must + HAVE can be interpreted espitemically but never deontically.
2.2.4. Dynamic
Dynamic modality is concerned with the ability and willingness, which comes from the internal
sources, for example,
John can speak French. (Ability) – Abilitive
John will do it for you. (Willingness) – Volitive
Ability can be interpreted as the physical or mental power of individuals to do something or
possibility in a general sense. For example:
He can go now. (Deontic: Permission)
He can run a mile in five minutes. (Dynamic: Ability)
He can escape. (Dynamic: the door’s not locked)
Unlike epistemic and deontic modality, past tense forms of can and will(could and would) can be
used to refer to actions in the past. For example,
When I was young, I could run very fast.
However, if the action actually happened in the past, neither couldnor would can be employed.
For example: * The house was on fire but luckily, they could escape. The past tense forms, could
and would, can be used to express willingness and ability more tentatively, for example when
making an offer:
4
bushes bụirậmchobằngđược
3 Epistemic and she felt it must Quảthực con An omission of modality can
5 (Deductive) be quite easy to him bécảmthấyviệcđóhoàntoàndễdàngđốivới be found.
Dickon
3 Dynamic If we talk about him I can't help Nếucứbànmãivềnónhưvậy, ta
6 (Abilitive) looking at him sẽchẳngthểnàongưngnhìnnóđược.
3 Deontic We must talk of something else Ta nênnóichuyệnkhácđi
7 (Obligative)
3 Epistemic He'll like it better if us talks o' Nósẽthíchhơnnếu ta nóichuyệngìkhác
8 (Asumptive) somethin' else
3 Deontic I knowed I must say nothin' about Tôivẫnbiếtkhôngđượcphépnóibấtcứchuyệ
9 (Obligative) him an' I don't like havin' to hide ngìvềcậuấy,
things màtôithìlạikhôngthíchchegiấuđiềugì.
4 Dynamic I'll never tell about it Tôichưahềkểvớiaivềnó
0 (Volitive)
4 Dynamic Colin's so afraid of it himself that he Bảnthân Colin
1 (Volitive) won't sit up khiếpsợviệcấyđếnnỗicậuấykhôngmuốnng
ồidậynữa
4 Epistemic He says he's always thinking that if Cậuấybảocậuấyluônnghĩrằngnếuthâymột An omission of modality
2 he cáibướumọcralàcậuấysẽphátđiênvàgàokh increases the degree of
should feel a lump coming he should ócchotớikhichết confidence.
go crazy and scream himself to death
4 Deontic Eh! he oughtn't to lie there thinkin' Trờiơi! Cậuấykhôngnênnằm ì
3 (Obligative) things like that ramàtưởngtượngnhữngđiềunhưvậy
4 Dynamic I was wonderin' if us could ever get Tôiđangnghĩnếucậuấyđượcrađâythìđỡiph The omission of modality as a
4 (Volitive) him in th' humor to come out here an' ải lo chuyệncaibướumọctrênlưng result of a change in the
A sugestion lie under th' trees in his carriage perspective.
4 Dynamic I've wondered if he could keep a Tôitựnhủkhôngbiếtcậuấycógiữđượcbímật The omission of modality does
5 (Ablitive) secret không not affect the meaning.
10
4. Conclusion
Various types of modality have been flexibly employed in the text to clearly express the attitude
and opinion of the speaker towards the propositional contents. One device can operate as many
above, 22 comments are provided, in which 21 are about the failure to keep the equivalence as a
result of omissions of modality and changes in the modal devices leading to, in some cases,
serious harms to the meaning of the original sentences/clauses. Moreover, epistemic modality
seems to be more likely to be mistranslated, possibly because there are various devices of
5. Reference