Professional Documents
Culture Documents
eginning with the most fundamental, DNS. The performance of three different numerical
techniques, i.e. RANS, URANS and LES were compared by Salim et al., (2011) to determin
e their suitability in the prediction of urban airflow and pollutant dispersion process usin
g the commercial CFD code Fluent. The CFD codes were evaluated against wind tunnel e
xperimental data, and it was observed that LES although more computationally expensive
, produces the most accurate and reliable results because it resolves the turbulent mixing
process in the flow field. URANS, albeit solving for the transient solution, fails to account
for the unsteady fluctuations and hence is not an appropriate replacement for LES (Sali
m et al., 2011).
Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) DNS refers to numerical solution of the discretised u
nsteady N–S equations. DNS is still a very long way away from being used for ventilation
design, due to the extreme demands it places on computing power. This is mainly due t
o the relatively small time steps and cell dimensions that are required. In addition, very s
mall time steps are needed to simulate the fine detail of temporal changes. The advanta
ges of DNS are that it is nominally exact i.e. no empiricisms (turbulence models) are requ
ired and no similar assumptions about transition are needed. As far as is known, DNS ha
s not yet been used specifically for ventilation studies. However, it has been used to simu
late the unsteady flows generated from flow separation on bluff bodies which is one sou
rce of turbulence in rooms.
Large-eddy Simulation (LES) Large eddy simulation (LES) is a technique in which the sma
llest scales of the flow are removed through a filtering operation, and their effect modell
ed using sub grid scale models (the Reynolds
Report 664
21
decomposition is used). This allows the largest and most important scales of the turbulen
ce to be resolved, while greatly reducing the computational cost incurred by the smallest
scales. This method requires greater computational resources than RANS methods. Sever
al examples of its use for natural ventilation are given in (Etheridge, 2011). LES provides
a direct unsteady solution for all but the smaller scales of the motion. The stresses that a
re directly calculated are known as the resolved stresses and those that are derived from
semi-empirical equations are known as the modelled stresses. LES is also considerably m
ore demanding on boundary conditions, since they should be specified in unsteady form.