Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Volume 10, Issue 03, March 2019, pp. 1127–1134, Article ID: IJMET_10_03_115
Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=3
ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359
Jana Nagarjun
Assistant professor Mechanical Engineering Department, CMR Technical Campus,
Hyderabad, JNTUH, India
ABSTRACT
The present study deals with modelling of a catalytic converter system for a
compression ignition engine. Many models fabricated and tried to fit with an existing
diesel engine. Since the compatibility of a diesel engine, exhaust with DPF is essential
as the pressure gradient need to be maintained. The size of the diesel particulate filter
is also important since the fabricated model size need to be sufficient to handle the
gasses without affecting the flow and engine performance. This work consists of
checking the fuel emission after changing the existing catalytic converter with disc mesh
coated with titanium oxide, copper nitrate and cerium oxide. Since these are readily
available, are cheap, and fabrication is also easy. Hence, the cost is reduced. The
engine test results showed that the emissions reduced with the new fabricated catalytic
converter comparing with diesel and Algae biodiesel blends.
Key words: catalytic converter, carbon Monoxide, Hydro Carbons.
Cite this Article: SK. Khasim Sharif and Jana Nagarjun, Design and Modelling of
Diesel Particulate Filter to Reduce the Emissions from CI Engine, International
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 10(3), 2019, pp. 1127–1134.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=3
1. INTRODUCTION
The physical removal of diesel particulates by filtration as a means of emission control is
investigating since the early 1980s [1]. The diesel particulate filters also called as the diesel
particulate traps [2-4]. A variety of filtration media, e.g. Alumina coated wire mesh, ceramic
fibre, porous ceramic monoliths studied for removal of particulates from the exhaust gases [6].
At present, honeycomb ceramic monolith that traps the particulate matter have the gases have
the gas flow through its porous walls is the most common form diesel particulate filters [7]. The
filters termed as ceramic wall flow filters, in this, the cellular ceramic filters alternatively
plugged. The exhaust gas comes in the cells that are open at the upstream end, flows through
the porous walls to the adjacent cells [9]. The neighbouring cells are open at the opposite
downstream end, and the filtered gas exits from the opposite end to the atmosphere.
physical characteristics
Mechanical Properties
Figure 4 Casing
A low carbon stainless steel using general corrosion resistance like T304 used because of
superior strength to intergranular corrosion ensuing stress relieving. It is highly recommended
for parts, which fabricated by welding and which cannot be annealed usually limited to
temperature up to 426°C. The physical properties and thermal treatments of T304L are similar
but not identical to T304. Non-magnetic when annealed but slightly magnetic when cold-
worked.
1.3.3. Coating
A. Experimental procedure
B. Preparing Stirring Mixture and slurry
3. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 6 12 18
load(Kg)
Graph 1 Load Vs CO
Graph.1. shows CO the emissions of B0, which is initially at 0.4% and later increased to
1.6%. At 0,6,12 & 18 kg load emission of CO is comparatively increased with B0, and with
DPF at 0, 6 &12 kg load CO is decreased. At 0, 6 &12 kg load the emissions of CO of B10,
B20 with & without DPF increased but not more than B0.
B0
1.8 B0 with DPF
B10
1.6
B10 with DPF
1.4 B20
B20 with DPF
CO2 (% Volume)
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 6 12 18
load (Kg)
350
B0
B0 with DPF
300
B10
B10 with DPF
250 B20
B20 with DPF
NOx(ppm)
200
150
100
50
0
0 6 12 18
load (Kg)
25
B0
B0 With DPF
B10
20
B10 With DPF
B20
B20With DPF
15
HC(ppm)
10
0
0 6 12 18
load (Kg)
Graph 4. Load VS HC
The HC emission-using B0, B10 & B20 is shown in Graph.4. The graph indicates the
increase in the HC emissions with the expansion with a load for B0, B10&B20.
B0
B0 with DPF
B10
B10 with DPF
20
B20
B20 with DPF
15
O2(% Volume)
10
0
0 6 12 18
load (Kg)
Graph 5. Load Vs O2
Graph.5 shows that at 0, 6, 12& 18 kg load the emissions of O2 of diesel with and without
DPF is decreased. While using biodiesel, O2 emissions are declining as compared to diesel.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The BSFC and BTE observed to be good with blending of algae biodiesel with diesel, which is
close to previous research results.
The emissions of CO are low with blends and CO2 has improved with blending which is
significant sign.
The NOx emissions improved with blending and smoke emissions lowered with blending.
The decline of smoke emissions is better with algae biodiesel blends.
Significant reductions of smoke emissions are possible with DPF.
REFERENCES
[1] Engine Emissions by B.P.Pundir.
[2] Y. Uchida, S. Ichikawa, T. Harada. Durability Study on Si-Sic Material for DPF[C]. SAE
Paper 2003-01-0384.
[3] M. Harada, S. Ichikawa, A. Otsuka, et al. Durability Study on Si-SiC Material for DPF
(3)[C]. SAE Paper 2005-010582, 2005.
[4] Cheng Li, Frank Mao, Reggie Zhan, et al. Durability Performance of Advanced Ceramic
Material DPFs[C].SAE Paper 2007-01-0918, 2007.
[5] Saurabh Mathur, John H. Johnson, Jeffrey D. Naber, et al. Experimental Studies of an
Advanced Ceramic Diesel Particulate Filter[C]. SAE Paper 2008-01-0622, 2008.
[6] Motor vehicle emissions regulations and fuel specification historic review 1996-2000.
[7] Mackinven and Hublin”European Program on emissions, Fuels and Engine technology-
objective and design”, SAE paper 1996.
[8] B. J. Cooper and J. E. Thoss, “Role of NO in diesel particulate emission control,” SAE,
Warrendale, PA, SAE Paper 89040, 1989.
[9] Dianna M. Young, David L. Hickman, Garima Bhatia,et al. Ash Storage Concept for Diesel
Particulate Filters[C]. SAE Paper 2004-01-0948, 2004
[10] R. Matarresea, L. Castoldia, L. Lietti, and P. Forzatti, “Soot combustion: Reactivity of
alkaline and alkaline earth metal oxides in full contact with soot,” Catal. Today, vol. 136,
no. 1, pp. 11–17, Jul. 2008.
[11] K. Nakatani, S. Hirota, S. Takeshima, K. Itoh, T. Tanaka, and K. Domae, “Simultaneous
PM and NOx reduction system for diesel engines,” presented at the 2002 SAE World Congr.
Exhib., Detroit, MI, Mar. 2002.
[12] The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Technical Highlights, EPA420-F03-
022, 2003, p. 1.
[13] G. A. Stratakis, D. L. Psarianos and A. M. Stamatelos, “Experimental investigation of
pressure drop in porous ceramic filters.” Proc. Instn MechEngrs, Volume 216, Part D: J
Automobile Engineering.
[14] Konstandopoulos, A.G., Papaioannou, E., “Update on the science and technology of diesel
particulate filters. KonaPowder, 2008; Part. 26: 36–65.
[15] Athanasios G. Konstandopoulos, M. K., SouzanaLorentzou, Chrysa Pagkoura and
EleniPapaioannou. 2007, "Soot Oxidation Kinetics in Diesel Particulate Filters."SAE-2007-
01-1129.
[16] Konstandopoulos, A. G. 2003. "Flow Resistance Descriptors for Diesel Particulate Filters:
Definitions, Measurements and Testing." SAE-2003-01-0846.
[17] Bilal Zuberi, James J. Liu, Sunilkumar C. Pillai, et al. Advanced High Porosity Ceramic
Honeycomb Wall Flow Filters[C]. SAE Paper 2008-01-0623, 2008.