Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MGMT 300E
20 May 2019
Snap Inc. has innovative technology and a growing audience, but the company is not
successful in all areas of business. Snap Inc.’s organizational environment hinders the progress of
the company and leaves employees feeling unwelcome and bitter. The company should evaluate
and address these internal problem areas in order to create a healthier company environment.
One of the major issues faced by Snap Inc. is a sense of isolation and disconnection felt by
employees. This is in large part due to the physical setup of offices. Employees are scattered
across the neighborhood of Venice, working in various buildings such as converted beach houses.
Because employees are physically separated from one another, employees must spend time
travelling to speak with coworkers. Additionally, this distance creates mental and emotional
separation. Working apart from others can lead to feelings of isolation and segregation.
Employees may not feel as though they are working toward the same goal or that they can trust
their colleagues. Coworkers may not even have the chance to encounter each other due to the
workforce. If employees cannot easily get to know their coworkers, they are more likely to
become victims of the erosion model, which states that employees with fewer coworker bonds are
more likely to quit. In addition, lacking these links may lead employees to feel less embedded in
the company culture, which reduces continuance commitment. Affective commitment is also less
expected if individuals are not close to those that they work with. The remaining type of
company, which Snap Inc. has not appeared to focus on. Reduced organizational commitment
leads to an increase in withdrawal behaviors, which are behaviors that employees engage in to
avoid work situations. These behaviors include both physical withdrawal, such as tardiness, and
to a company. For example, a 2002 estimate found that absenteeism, a form of physical
withdrawal, costs employers about $789 per employee (Kocakülâh et al., 2011). It is ideal to have
a committed workforce that does not engage in these negative behaviors, and therefore Snap Inc.
should take steps to reduce isolation and increase the organizational commitment at the firm.
To address these problems related to employee isolation, Snap Inc. should build a central
campus facility for employees to work in. By bringing the employees together, instead of spread
out across the neighborhood, employees can be physically and emotionally closer. Transportation
times to meet with coworkers are reduced which makes work more efficient and allows for easier
collaboration, and employees can bond with others and feel more connected to their organization.
In the article “The Rise of the Corporate Campus,” Chevez and Huppatz explain, “As well as a
physical workspace, the campus [is] a symbolic, cultural and social place” and the corporate
campus suggests a sense of community (Chevez & Huppatz, 2018). By restructuring the
organization into a more connected environment, employees can feel more integrated into the
company and united toward a common purpose. And it will be easier to easier make work
connections that embed them in the company and influence organizational commitment. Many
technology companies already use this campus model. For example, Google’s sprawling
“Googleplex” campus is well known, and Apple recently opened a new campus known as Apple
Park. If Snap Inc. was to build a central campus for its employees, communication would
increase, organizational commitment would go up, and employees would be more willing to
Another major problem that Snap Inc. faces is lack of transparency. The company’s
culture promotes secrecy at the expense of communication. Employees cannot easily exchange
information and they are consistently left clueless about important projects. This model creates
frustration among employees, who sometimes don’t find out about major product updates until
they are announced to the public. The lack of communication has led to resentment by Snap
These sentiments lead to lower job satisfaction and decreased motivation. Employees are
not satisfied with their work because they have little knowledge of results due to relatively no
feedback from their work as well as low levels of responsibility of outcomes, which comes from
low levels of autonomy. In addition, job satisfaction suffers due to poor supervision satisfaction.
With constant secrets and a strict top-down leadership system, employees do not experience high
levels of satisfaction. Job satisfaction has a moderate correlation with job performance, meaning
that if employees are dissatisfied, they will perform worse. Organizational commitment also
suffers from low job satisfaction, so employees are more likely to quit or engage in behaviors
Motivation is also a concern because at Snap Inc. there is not a significant sense of
psychological empowerment. Psychological empowerment is the belief that your tasks are
contributing to a larger purpose. Snap Inc. does not spend time communicating a clear backstory
or company vision, and the constant secrecy contributes to the ambiguity of Snap’s purpose.
Without a compelling story or idea, employees are left feeling as though they are completing
mindless tasks. Therefore motivation and effort are reduced. Because motivation has a strong
correlation with job performance, it is in Snap’s best interest to find improvements in these areas.
In order to deal with these issues, Snap Inc. should reevaluate its communication methods.
The firm should focus less energy on keeping secrets and more energy on sharing the company’s
goals and aspirations. If employees are invested in the goal, they will be more willing to work
toward it. And allowing for more transparency will decrease frustration among employees and
they will feel more valued and therefore more satisfied. Snap Inc. should also consider a system
in which employees are encouraged to contribute ideas. At present, the CEO makes all product
decisions without input from those around him. In order to give employees more autonomy and
room to be creative, the company should allow individuals to participate in the idea generation
process. Employees will feel more involved and organizational commitment will rise. This
process may also result in a successful innovation that wouldn’t have been developed otherwise.
For example, Google’s well-known email service “Gmail” was developed as an employee side-
project under a system called “20% time” that encouraged company-wide innovation (Mims &
Mims, 2013). Whether successful products arise or not, offering autonomy and freedom to be
creative and communicate ideas will increase motivation and job satisfaction among Snap
employees.
Snap Inc. is developing steadily, but some of its management practices may inhibit
growth. With scattered office buildings, a culture of secrecy, and an unclear company purpose,
Snap Inc. is not cultivating a committed and satisfied workforce. In order to create a healthier
work environment that employees can thrive in, the company should build a central campus
facility and should reevaluate the company’s communication values. These changes would greatly
Chevez, A., & Huppatz, D. (2018). The Rise of the Corporate Campus. The Conversation.
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organizational Behavior (5th ed.). New
Kocakülâh, M. C., Kelley, A. G., Mitchell, K. M., & Ruggieri, M. P. (2011). Absenteeism
Problems And Costs: Causes, Effects And Cures. International Business & Economics
Lee, S. (2016). What it's Like to Work at Snapchat, One of Tech's Most Secretive
Mims, C., & Mims, C. (2013). Google's "20% time," which brought you Gmail and AdSense, is