Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IV ARTICLES
ARTICLELESS PROPER NAMES
existence (they are mark-words of nouns), we shall start with the division of
nouns into articleless Proper names (P) and articled common nouns subdivided
people), like John, Smith, and composite John Smith. Non-personal (specific
London, America, Japan, Snowdown, Etna, Christmas, Lent, July, Friday, Good
or proper names are names of specific people, places, and so forth, having
unique reference and thus not sharing the characteristics of common nouns (lack
of articles, initial capital letter). Such descriptions are not satisfactory. To arrive
at a precise definition, we must, first of all, realize that Countables (Cs) contrast
Proper names (Ps) by forming classes. For example, a boy is a singular/plural
common class-noun naming the whole class of youth who share the same
features, whereas John is a P given to a specific boy, separately. This difference
` youth (= people +
age)
boys (= people + age = sex)
John (= people + age + sex +
unique, individual features
distinguishing him from any
other boy or John)
The diagram shows that the range of each class depends on the number
of its distinguishing features: the greater the number, the smaller the range.
with the maximum number of distinctive features and the minimum range of
application confined to one specific person or entity. This makes the P so unique
further specification, viz. a to indicate one of the class (124), and the to specify
well-known as John and, although it can take the (115), by being uncountable, it
is used without a. In other words, Us are singular-form non-class nouns.
In this way, by means of the P, we have also defined C and U. That is
why the Proper name provides the key to article usage in English.
101.1. But how to account for the fact that many boys can carry the
same P "John"? The definition of the P is relevant only if both speaker and
hearer know exactly which John is meant, i.e. if both of them know his unique,
C, though still written with a capital letter. For instance, a secretary will say to
her boss: A Mr. Smith called while you were out when she informs about an
unknown caller (to her he is then one of the class of Smiths), against Mr. Smith
called while.... to mean his (and her) well-known (unique) visitor. Both
statements concern different persons; in the former case the boss’s ignorance
compels her to treat a Mr. Smith as a class-name (a certain person (cf. 124)
giving his name as Smith, i.e. out of more than one Smith, cf. 103) in exactly the
same way as A man called while you were out or as in I remember a/one John
Smith at school which indicates that there were more than one boy with the same
name and surname and I recall one of them without saying which one.
Consequently, we will say:
102. Titles
and:
and even:
Democratic Leader Robinson
the author/the poet, etc Paul Jones (compare: the Czar Nicholas, below)
Foreign titles usually follow the British usage:
Czar Nicholas. In the reverse case, we have the Czar Nicholas with Nicholas
used restrictively to the Czar (which Czar; the Czar named Nicholas, cf. 117). In
this head function the Czar becomes a non-title preceded by the definite article.
Similarly:
102.1. Emotive non-restrictive (i.e. additional, non-qualifying)
and:
dear old Emily
non-personal:
beautiful Spain
dear Poland
torrid Egypt
historic York
sunny July, etc.
Similarly:
Pitt the younger (the younger Pitt as distinct from the older one)
Henry the eighth (the eighth Henry usually written Henry VIII)
With some famous Ps tradition itself settles the sense of their modifiers;
lack of article then means a sort of title, the stands for superlative degree (cf.
118.1):
Immortal Shakespeare
moral Gower