Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What is a dissertation?
The dissertation counts for one-third of the entire degree i.e. 60 credits. It is a long
written piece of research with a minimum length of 12,000 words and a maximum
length of 15,000 words including all footnotes, references and appendices. The aim of
the dissertation is to enable students to advance their knowledge of the field covered
by their degree programme by pursuing an independent research project on a chosen
topic within the field. Students completing the dissertation will have examined a
subject in substantial depth, shown evidence of an ability to undertake sustained
critical analysis, developed and improved their research skills, and produced a long
piece of written work that demonstrates understanding of their area of study.
For further details on the College’s policy on research ethics, please see:
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/sshp/research/sshp-ethics-committee-and-procedures/proposal-
procedure
You should have up to three meetings with your supervisor. It is up to you to contact
your supervisor for meetings and you should make sure that you do so in good time.
Please note that the supervisor is under no obligation to meet you during the summer
term, which runs from July to October so it is advisable that all supervision meetings
take place before then. Nor is the supervisor required to find you a suitable topic for
the dissertation, read preliminary drafts of your work, offer you guidance or assistance
after the end of the summer term or proof read your final draft.
Additional Support
In workshop week, which is held in both the autumn and spring terms, lectures and
seminars for specific modules are replaced by general study skills sessions and other
events. A departmental dissertation workshop is held in the autumn workshop week to
provide general guidance on writing a dissertation in the field of politics. A
programme-specific workshops that offers guidance on conducting research related to
your degree programme is held in either the autumn or spring workshop week. The
Departmental Office will provide you with details of these events in due course.
Birkbeck’s Centre for Transformative Practice in Learning and Teaching also offers a
range of academic development workshops for students. Some courses are initially
only available to first year undergraduates, but other students can join a standby list.
All workshops are free of charge unless stated otherwise. Topics covered in these
modules include:
Moodle
Reading skills
Note taking
Time Management
Essay writing
Academic English
2
For more details, please see: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/learning-and-teaching/supporting-
learning/students-skills-development
Assessment Criteria
The dissertation is assessed according to the following criteria, with credit given to
the extent that:
Marking Schema
The pass mark for the dissertation is 50. Dissertations written for courses or during
examinations are marked according to the schema:
0-29: A totally inadequate dissertation, which does not specify a research question,
fails to present an argument, is largely descriptive, shows little or no knowledge of
the topic, or its intellectual context, does not refer adequately to the relevant
literature, fails to follow an appropriate methodology, and is shoddily presented
3
70-79: A dissertation of distinction quality, which addresses a well-defined
research question, displays exceptional knowledge of the literature and/or a
substantial measure of originality, and achieves a high standard of presentation.
Plagiarism
The dissertation must be your own work. Plagiarism - the presentation of another
person's thoughts or words as one's own - in the dissertation constitutes grounds for
failing the dissertation; more serious sanctions may be also applied if circumstances
warrant them. Please read the plagiarism guidelines in the annex to this document to
ensure that you understand the concept of plagiarism and why it should be avoided.
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/mybirkbeck/services/administration/assessment/exams/mitigati
ng-circumstances
Annex
4
Department of Politics
Please copy and paste this form into a new document, complete it, and upload it to the Moodle site for
your dissertation, which you can find at moodle.bbk.ac.uk.
Name:
E-mail address:
Full-time or part-time?
5
SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE, HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
BIRKBECK, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON
PROPOSAL TO CONDUCT RESEARCH
FOR ETHICAL APPROVAL
A: Your details
1. Name of investigator:
3. Department:
6. Contact email:
B: Your project
3. Research schedule
6
Date of ethics application:
4. Other organisations
Are you involving an external body (e.g. a school, charity or company) in your
data collection or for access to participants?
If yes, does that external body have their own ethics approval process?
If you are a member of academic staff applying for external funding (e.g. from
the AHRC, ESRC, etc.) are you seeking approval for:
-Outline proposal YES/NO
-Full proposal YES/NO
-Modification to your previously approved project YES/NO
If this is an application for approving a modification, please provide the title
and date of your initial application.
C. Methodology
1. Your participants:
How many?
7
Any procedure which could cause harm to the participant? YES/NO
Any participants whose physical/mental health could be put at risk? YES/NO
Actively misleading or deceiving the participants? YES/NO
Withholding information about the nature or outcome of the study? YES/NO
Any inducement or payment to take part in the study? YES/NO
Any procedure that might inadvertently cause distress? YES/NO
If you answered YES to any of these questions please details the steps you will take
to additionally safeguard your participants:
3. Where will your investigation take place? Provide details of the setting for your
interaction with participants:
4. How will you collect your data (e.g. experiments, questionnaires, interviews,
group discussion)?
5. Are you using any forms, questionnaires, interview schedules or other materials
to gather your data? If yes, please provide copies.
D. Informed consent
1. How will you explain to participants what will be involved in taking part in your
study?
If you are diverging from this practice of consent for minors please provide your
rationale and the steps you will take to gain consent.
8
3. Do your participants include vulnerable individuals or those with limited legal
capacity? YES/NO
If YES, please provide details of who else will give informed consent:
If YES, please provide details of opt in/opt out consent from parents or
guardians:
4. Are you using the Birkbeck template information and informed consent forms?
YES/NO
If NO, please provide details of how you will gain informed consent.
Please provide the information sheet and consent forms you plan to use.
E. Confidentiality
If NO, provide details of what steps will be taken to ensure that participants
understand and agree that their participation will not be kept confidential and the
reasons why?
If YES, provide details of how will you ensure the confidentiality/anonymity of your
participants:
2. How will your data be saved, shared and disseminated after the project is
completed?
G. Risk
9
Sensitive topics? YES/NO
If your research involves minors or vulnerable individuals have you had the
necessary criminal background check required?
YES/NO
If you are involving live participants, will you be alone with them? YES/NO
Might the research raise media/social/legal concern in the public domain? YES/NO
H. If you feel the proposed investigation raises other ethical issues please
outline them here.
10
I agree to carry out the study in an ethically informed way and to ensure that
participants, researcher(s) and the college are safeguarded.
YES/ NO
I agree to carry out the study in line with current Freedom of Information and
Data Protection practices, including storing and transferring data securely.
YES/NO
If you determine that this application does not raise any additional or novel ethical
issues and is deemed to be ‘routine’ you must answer YES to the following
questions.
If the answer to any of these questions is NO, or you have any concerns about the
ethics of the proposal, please send this application to your department’s ethics
officer to be handled as ‘non-routine’.
I have read the application and/or discussed its ethical implications with the
student and confirm that in my view all ethical issues have been addressed:
YES/ NO
I consider the application to be ‘routine’ because it does not raise ethical issues
beyond those of a study which has already received school ethics approval:
YES/NO
If you have signed the application off as ‘routine’ please send this form to your
departmental ethics officer to confirm approval and send to the departmental
repository.
11
If you have signed the application as ‘non-routine’ please send this form to your
department ethics officer for further consideration.
‘NON-ROUTINE’ PROJECTS
For completion by departmental ethics officers:
2. While the nature of the application is 'non-routine', I have worked with the
applicant and/or supervisor to address ethical implications and confirm that in my
view the ethical implications have been addressed, and I hereby grant approval for
the project to commence. YES/ NO
If you have replied NO, please provide details of the ethical concerns briefly here:
If you consider the application ‘routine’ or have replied ‘YES’ to question 2 above
please return this form to the investigator/supervisor who will inform the student that
the project may commence and send this form to your departmental repository.
If you have replied ‘NO’ please indicate an appropriate reviewer external to your
department (but within the college) who may be more cognisant of specific
disciplinary issues in regard to ethics and send this form to the school ethics
committee at sshpethics@bbk.ac.uk.
Email:
12
For completion by the departmental ethics officer:
2. If ‘non-routine’:
Please provide details of the ethical concerns briefly here:
Staff proposals for ethics review should be considered by the DREO. If the DREO
considers the proposal to be routine then they can sign the form to indicate this and
the research can begin. The exception is ESRC funded research which must be
reviewed by the SSHP Ethics Committee and cannot be signed off by the DREO. All
non-routine proposals must be referred to SSHP Ethics Committee by the DREO.
Email:
If NO, please detail the ethical concerns that need to be address and return
this form to the investigator/supervisor for their consideration.
If YES, please sign below to indicate that this project now has ethical approval
to commence. Send this approved form to the school ethics committee at
sshpethics@bbk.ac.uk who will inform the departmental ethics officer and
investigator/supervisor that the project may commence. This form will be sent
by the investigator/supervisor to their departmental repository.
If you consider the application ‘routine’ or have replied ‘YES’ to question 2 above
please return this form to the investigator/supervisor who will inform the student that
the project may commence and send it to their departmental repository.
13
SIGNATURE of External reviewer: Date:
14
Template information sheet and consent form
** This should be completed/modified to fit your own study**
Department of ..............
BIRKBECK
University of London
Malet Street,
London WC1E 7HX
020 7631 6000
Title of Study:
Name of researcher:
If you agree to participate you will agree a convenient time and place for me
to interview you for about an hour. You are free to stop the interview and
withdraw at any time.
Your data will kept be anonymous by …….. and will be stored ………..
15
Sample consent form
** This should be completed/modified to fit your own study**
Title of Study:
Name of researcher
I have been informed about the nature of this study and willingly consent to
take part in it.
Name
______________________________________________________________
Signed
______________________________________________________________
Date
______________________________________________________________
There should be two signed copies, one for participant, one for
researcher.
16
RESEARCH ETHICS GENERAL GUIDANCE
Ethical approval for all research. Ethical approval is required for all research
which involves human participants. This includes research where there is no
face-to-face interaction between researcher and participants (e.g., postal
questionnaires, telephone interviews, and internet surveys).
17
referral to an appropriately qualified person). As a general rule, researchers
should debrief participants at the end of the research either verbally or in
writing.
18
This document is modified from the guidelines for minimum standards of
ethical approval in psychological research, British Psychological Society
19
Department of Politics
Date:
Student Number:
Programme of Study:
Supervisor:
Title of Dissertation:
Dissemination: I agree to this coursework being made available anonymously to future students in the
Department of Politics. Yes or No (Please delete as appropriate).
20
Some Tips on Writing a Postgraduate Dissertation
A dissertation should address a well-defined research question, specified at the outset.
It should present a logically developed argument, the claims of which are supported
by evidence where necessary.
A dissertation must have an element of your own research. This can be demonstrated
by exploring previously neglected primary sources, undertaking an original theoretical
analysis or interpretation of existing literature, or using primary material to develop
your own critique of existing scholarly arguments. It is not enough simply to review
the books and articles which you have collected on the topic.
The dissertation should demonstrate not only that you can collect evidence and
consider a particular problem or topic in detail, but also that you understand how the
topic relates to the work others have done in the same field. The review of the
literature should show how the works of different authors on the topic relate to one
another and where your own work is intended to fit in, and the analysis should show
an awareness of what others who have addressed related questions have already said
(or are saying) and of the implications of their various views and positions for your
own work.
Choosing a topic
Start thinking about possible topics as early as possible. Look at relevant debates in
the literature to see how problems are framed and what arguments are made. Choose
something that interests you, since enthusiasm is an important motivating factor in
writing a good dissertation. Remember, though, that the project must be intellectually
feasible, practicable in terms of gaining access to the necessary sources and
manageable in the time available. The subject may be related to your work, but note
that the dissertation has specific academic aims and requirements which differ from
the aims and requirements of reports and studies you may be asked to prepare in the
course of your work.
Note the requirements outlined above to determine whether a topic will be suitable for
a dissertation. Consider in particular whether:
- there is a relevant academic literature which can be discussed in the literature
review and built on in developing the research;
21
- the topic allows for an original contribution, for example by using primary
sources;
- the research question is genuinely researchable; in other words, whether it can
be answered through systematic academic enquiry, as opposed to mere
assertion or speculation.
Structure
Although structure varies according to the topic and methodology chosen, a
dissertation typically consists of several parts, which should be formally indicated by
section breaks or chapters. A possible structure is as follows:
The introduction states the objectives of the dissertation, outlines the research
question, and identifies how it is intended to meet the objectives and answer
the question. In other words, the research methodology employed is described
and its appropriateness to the topic explained.
The topic is placed in its academic context by reviewing the relevant scholarly
literature and relating the research question to academic debates.
Primary and secondary source material is presented, with an appropriate
account of how primary material was gathered (e.g. how an interview schedule
was developed) and how sources might be interpreted in the light of their
authorship.
An argument or interpretation is advanced in the light of the evidence.
The conclusion presents a summary of the findings of the dissertation, relates
these to the argument outlined in the introductory chapter and states precisely
what has been demonstrated.
Each of the main sections or chapters (i.e. not including the introduction and
conclusion) should begin with a paragraph outlining its aims and content, and
conclude with a brief summary.
Present data with graphic illustrations (graphs, tables, charts, diagrams, flowcharts or
organigrams) where appropriate. Make sure that the text explains and discusses the
data. Do not consign important information to appendices; whereever possible,
integrate it into the text. All graphics must be clearly presented, be a reasonable size,
have relevant headings and acknowledge sources.
22
Remember that writing takes a long time, far longer than you may anticipate, so plan
carefully and leave plenty of time for re-drafting and a final proof-reading before the
submission deadline.
The same rules on providing text references and bibliographic information in essays
should be followed in writing the dissertation. However, due to the greater range of
material used, more thought may need to be given as to how to ensure that references
are appropriately and consistently provided. The guidelines on referencing provided
by the Department may answer some questions; otherwise, consult your supervisor.
As with essays, there are several different referencing conventions and it does not
matter which one you adopt provided that you sources are properly cited, all the
necessary information is given and consistency is maintained. However, the 'Harvard'
system is particularly recommended, not least because it is relatively simple and 'user-
friendly'.
What to avoid
23
dissertation. Its inclusion reflects an awareness that it is somehow relevant but
it is never brought to bear on the case or cases under discussion.
Poor contextualisation. The dissertation should demonstrate that you
understand how the topic relates to the work others have done in the same
field. The review of the literature should identify relevant debates and outline
the positions of the main participants in order to situate the topic of your
dissertation and the argument that you present. Do not make an argument in a
vacuum.
Uncritical use of sources. It is important to subject sources to critical
scrutiny. A wide range of sources may be used in a dissertation, but students
should demonstrate an understanding of whether a source should be treated as
authoritative and of the need to cross-check and ‘triangulate’ important
empirical claims. Academic sources should also be interrogated for logical
argument, internal coherence and strength of evidence.
24
Birkbeck Plagiarism Guidelines
What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is the most common form of examination offence encountered in
universities, partly because of the emphasis now placed on work prepared by
candidates unsupervised in their own time, but also because many students fall into it
unintentionally, through ignorance of what constitutes plagiarism. Even if
unintentional, it will still be considered an examination offence.
Example 1
Original source:
Greengross, Sally (1997), “What Patients want from their Doctors”, Choosing
Tomorrow’s Doctors, ed. Allen I, Brown PJ, Hughes P, Policy Studies Institute,
London.
25
Plagiarism:
The essential aspects of a doctor’s role today are to work as part of a team, be able
and prepared to continue to learn throughout one’s career, and, most importantly, to
take on board both care for the individual and the community.
Acceptable:
One social writer believes that the essential aspects of a doctor’s role today are to
work as part of a team, be able and prepared to continue to learn throughout one’s
career, and, most importantly, to take on board both care for the individual and the
community (Greengross, 1997).
Example 2
Original source:
The binary shape of British higher education, until 1992, suggested a simple and
misleading, dichotomy of institutions. […] Within their respective classes, universities
and polytechnics were imagined to be essentially homogeneous. Their actual diversity
was disguised. [….] The abandonment of the binary system, whether or not it
encourages future convergence, highlights the pluralism which already exists in
British Higher Education.
Scott, Peter (1995), The Meanings of Mass Higher Education, SRHE and Open
University Press, Buckingham, p43.
Plagiarism:
Prior to the removal of the binary divide between polytechnics and universities in
1992, there was a misleading appearance of homogeneity in each sector. Now there is
only one sector, the diversity of institutions is more apparent, even if convergence
may be where we’re heading.
Acceptable:
Peter Scott has argued that prior to the removal of the binary divide between
polytechnics and universities in 1992, there was a misleading appearance of
homogeneity in each sector. Now there is only one sector, the diversity of institutions
is more apparent, even if convergence may be where we’re heading. (Scott, 1994)
In each revision, the inclusion of the author’s name acknowledges whose ideas these
originally were (not the student’s) and the reference refers the reader to the full
location of the work when combined with a footnote or bibliography. Note that in the
second example, the argument was paraphrased – but even so, this is plagiarism of the
idea without acknowledgement of whose idea this really is. In writing any work,
therefore (whether for assessment or not) you should document everything that you
borrow – not only direct quotations and paraphrases but also information and ideas.
There are, of course, some common-sense exceptions to this, such as familiar
proverbs, well-known quotations or common knowledge. But you must indicate the
26
source of any appropriated material that readers might otherwise mistake for your
own. If in doubt, cite your source or sources.
Re-submission of work
Another form of plagiarism is submitting work you previously submitted before for
another assignment. While this is obviously not the same as representing someone
else’s ideas as your own, it is a form of self-plagiarism and is another form of
cheating. If you want to re-work a paper for an assignment, ask your lecture whether
this is acceptable, and acknowledge your re-working in a preface.
Copyright infringement
Finally, you must guard against copyright infringement. Even if you acknowledge the
source, reproducing a significant portion of any document (including material on the
Internet) without permission is a breach of copyright, and a legal offence. You may
summarise, paraphrase and make brief quotations (as I have done from my sources),
but more than this risks infringing copyright.
References
Modern Language Association (1998) Guide for Writers of Research Papers (4th
edition), MLA, New York
27