You are on page 1of 64

RESEARCH REPORT

ON

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY

Submitted to Pratap University, Jaipur as a Partial fulfillment of the


requirement for the award of degree

Of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA)
SESSION (2017-2019)

SUBMITTED TO: - SUBMITTED BY:-

PROF. AKANKSHA VERMA HARISH CHANDRA


MAURYANISHAT FATMA
Head of Department MBA- 4th SEM
Pratap University Roll No.: MB170011
PRATAP UNIVERSITY
Sunderpura (Chandwaji) Delhi-Jaipur Highway, Jaipur, Rajasthan 303104
CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that Mr. Harish Chandra MauryaMs. Nishat Fatma is a bonafide student of 4th

Semester of the MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (Batch 2017-19) of Pratap

University, Jaipur.

He has completed his Research Project work entitled “Employee Satisfaction Survey” Under my

guidance.

I certify that this is his original effort and has not been copied from any other source. This project has

also not been submitted in any other institute/University for the purpose of award of any degree.

This project fulfills the requirement of the curriculum prescribed by this Institute for the said course.

I recommend this project work for evaluation and consideration for the award of Degree to the

student.

Submitted To: -

Name- Name-

Department of Management Head of Department

Studies Pratap University

Pratap University
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I wish to express my deep gratitude to research guide and providing me with continuous support and

guidance. This report could not have been completed without the inputs and the words of advice

from him for which I shall always remain grateful to him.

I feel short of words and express my heartiest gratitude to my parents & all my family whose

blessing & affection have been a continuous source of inspiration.

I wish to express my appreciation to all those whom I worked with, interacted and their thoughts &

insights helped me in broadening my understanding & knowledge of working in a corporate

atmosphere.

The research project work itself gave me a insight into working of an organization & application of

some important concepts that I have been studying as a student of M.B.A.

At last but not the least, I am grateful to all those who have directly or indirectly helped me during

my work.

With immense pleasure, we are presenting “Employee Satisfaction Survey” Research Project report

as part of the curriculum of ‘Master of Business Administration.' We wish to thank all the people

who gave us unending support.

I express my profound thanks to research guide and all those who have indirectly guided and helped

us in preparation of this project.

We also like to extend our gratitude to all staff and our colleagues of College of Management, who

provided moral support, a conductive work environment and the much-needed inspiration to

conclude the project in time and a special thanks to my parents who are integral part of the project.
Thanking you.

Harish Chandra MauryaNishat Fatma


DECLARATION

To,

The Head of Department,

Pratap University

Jaipur, Rajasthan

Pin code: 303104

Respected Sir,

I declare that the project entitled “A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION

SURVEY IN ADITYA BIRLA RETAIL LIMITED(ABRL)” is the work done by me during the

period of study under the supervision. Professor, Department of Management studies. With the

best of my knowledge, a similar work has not been submitted earlier to Pratap University, Jaipur

for the fulfillment of the requirement of a course of study.

This project work is submitted on partial fulfillment of the requirement for award of the

degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION of PRATAP UNIVERSITY, JAIPUR

is my original work.

Place:

Date: Signature
I, Harish Chandra Maurya, the student of MBA- IV Semester, Pratap University, Jaipur, do

hereby declare that the Research report entitled “Employee Satisfaction Survey” is an

original work developed and submitted by me under the guidance.

The empirical findings in this project report are not copied from any report and are true and

best of my knowledge.

DATE:

PLACE:

ROLL NO.: Signature of student


COMPANY PROFILE

ADITYA BIRLA RETAIL LTD

Aditya Birla Retail Limited is the retail arm of Aditya Birla Group, a USD Corporation. The

Company ventured into food and grocery retail sector in 2007was acquisition of a south based

supermarket chain. Subsequently Aditya Birla Retail Ltd.

Expanded its presence across the country under the brand “more.” With 2 functions of market

Hypermarket & Supermarket.

Supermarket

More For you- Conveniently located in neighborhoods, more. Supermarkets catered dialy

weekly and monthly shopping needs of consumers. The product offerings includes wide range of

fresh fruits & vegetables, groceries ,personal care ,home care, global merchandise & a basic range of

apparels. Currently, there are 6000 supermarkets across the country.

Hyper market

More MEGASTORE- is a one-top shopping destination for the entire family. Best large

range of products across fruits & vegetables, groceries, FMCG products

More. MEGASTORE also has a strong emphasis on general merchandise apparels CDIT.

Currently ten hypermarkets operate under the brand more. Mega store for example Vadodara,

Mumbai, Hyderabad, Indore, rohininagar in New Delhi.

VISION AND VALUES OF THE ADITYA BIRLA RETAIL LIMITED

VISION: “To consistently provide the Indian consumer complete and difference shopping

experience and be amongst India’s Top retailers, while delivering stock return to all stakeholders”.

VALUES:

Integrity

Commitment

Passion

Seamlessness
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

At more. For you we are committed to deliver quality& value to our customers and range

of private label brands as well as commercially branded products, offering satisfaction on the quality

of the products & services offered.

More for you hosts a range of private label brands across various categories that stringent

quality norms, and are available in attractive prices and packaging premium products give you the

opportunity to enjoy the difference and quality equal to better than the market’s leading brands, but at

competitive prices.

At A Glance

With a vision is to be among the leading retail players in India. Aditya birla retil limited launched

its first supermarket, more. For you in May, 2007. Since its launch, the

More. for you has an aggressive roll out, reaching a total count of 640 stores across today.

More. For you neighborhood supermarket which takes care of your every household needs and

more. Spread across a wide range of products of food and food items ranging from basic

necessities such as fruits and vegetables, such personal care, home care, household care products,

general merchandise, and products, more. For you provide a one stop solution for your grocery

shopping. Also in store are essentials such as, inner wear, kids essentials and a pharmacy, and

mobile store. With a range of over 4000 products, we are able to fulfill your shopping needs all

under one roof, at a convenient location close to you.

The product categories available in our store

Bakery Home Needs & Home Up keep

Beauty concepts Home Décor products

Beverages Mobile store

Basic Apparels Personal care& cosmetics

Cutlery& Cookware Processed Food


Fruits &Vegetables Pharmacy

FMCG Products Ready to cook/Prepared Food

Grocery Small white Appliances

General Merchandise Staples

Home care Products Stationery

Women’s Accessories
INTRODUCTION

Employee satisfaction is a set of favorable or unfavorable feelings and emotions with which

employees view their work. Employee satisfaction is an affective attitude a feeling of relative like or

dislike something (for example, a satisfied employee may comment that “I enjoy having a variety

of tasks to do”) There is an important difference between the job related feelings of satisfaction and

two other elements of employee attitudes

The same employee may have an intellectual response to her work, stating the objective

thought (belief) that “my work is quite complex” on another occasion, the employee may voice her

behavioral intentions to a coworker (I plan to quit this job in three months). Attitudes, then, consists

of feelings, thoughts and intentions to act.

Employee satisfaction is the essential part of the employee engagement. Today employee

engagement encompasses training, development and career, immediate management, cooperation,

work environment, equal opportunity and fair treatment, leadership, performance management,

health and safety, job satisfaction, work life balance, communication, compensation, benefits,

commitment, family friendliness, fun and social activities. These are the important drivers that make

feel good and involved, leading to an increase engagement.

Employee satisfaction is essential to face the dynamic and ever-increasing challenges of

maintaining productivity of the organization by keeping their workforce constantly engaged and

motivated .in the present era of globalization, the varied and changing demands of consumers are

putting consistent pressure on the employers

To satisfy their needs and to be competitive in the business. Furthermore environmental pressures,

rising health costs and various needs of the workforce also pose a challenge for the management.

This could be overcome by creating a work environment that maintains employee satisfaction as well

as motivates people towards exceptional performance at the workplace achieving work-life balance.
Locke gives a comprehensive definition of job satisfaction as involving cognitive, effective and

evaluative reactions or attitudes and states it is "a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting

from the appraisal of one's job or job experience." Job satisfaction is a result of employees'

perception of how well their job provides those things that are viewed as important.

There are three generally accepted dimensions to job satisfaction.

First, job satisfaction is an emotional response to a job situation, as such it cannot be seen; it can only

be inferred.

Second, job satisfaction is often determined by how well outcomes meet or exceed expectations. For

example if organizational participants feel that they are working more harder than others in the

department but are receiving fewer rewards, they will probably have a negative attitude toward the

work, the boss or the co-workers. They will be dissatisfied. On the other hand, if they feel they are

being treated very well and are being paid equitably, they are likely to have a positive attitude toward

the job. They will be job - satisfied.

Third, job satisfaction represents several related attitudes.


STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION

 Shared mission and vision

 Work itself

 Compensation and benefits

 Performance appraisal

 Relationship with supervisor

 Promotions and career Development

 Build a corporate culture

 Working condition and environment

 Improvement programs of employee satisfaction

 Employers by themselves.
FACTORS DETERMINING EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION

 Factors affecting jobs are the main factors of job satisfaction, which may be challenging

work, reward systems, working conditions, colleagues, learning and personality. Skill variety

autonomy and significance are challenging tasks, which provide maximum satisfaction to

employees. Many people feel bored if a job is too simple and routine, but many employees

also enjoy simple and routine jobs.

 The job characteristics are important factors for providing satisfaction. Reward systems,

equitable rewards, equal pay for equal work, promotion avenues, etc are satisfaction factors.

Money is important to employees having unfulfilled basic needs, i.e. they require more award

and recognition.

 Fairness in promotion, unbiased attitude of management, responsibilities and social status are

the factors that are said to be providing satisfaction to employees.

 Working conditions influence employee's level of satisfaction. Under conducive working

condition, people prefer to work hard while in an adverse atmosphere people avoid work.

Working condition not only include physicals of the work but also the working relationships

in the organization. The physical conditions, for example, are the light, temperature,

willingness, etc. A clerk working under routine conditions likes to work hard in an air -

conditioned atmosphere with computer facilities. It increases the working capacity of the

employee.

 The relationships between the employees and the managers have an important bearing on job

satisfaction.
 Job satisfaction is greater in case the higher authority is sympathetic, friendly and willing to

help the employees. Employees feel satisfied when their views are listened to and regarded

by their higher authorities

 Personal attitude and perceptions are the employees' angles of satisfaction, which should be

taken into consideration while motivating people to arrive at job satisfaction

 Feedback from the job itself and autonomy are two of the major job-related motivational

factors. A recent found that career development was most important to both younger and

older employees.

 Supervision is another moderately important of job satisfaction. There seem to be two

dimensions of supervisory style that affect job satisfaction. One is employee centeredness,

which is measured by the degree to which a supervisor takes a personal interest and cares

about the employee.

 It commonly is manifested in ways such as checking to see how well the employee is doing,

providing advice and assistance to the individual, and communicating with the associate on a

personal as well as an official level . The other dimension is participation or influence, as

illustrated by managers who allow their people to participate in decisions that affect their own

jobs. In most case, this approach leads higher job satisfaction.

Friendly, cooperative co-workers or team members are a modest source of job satisfaction to

individual employees. The group, especially a "tight" team, serves as a source of support,

comfort, advice, and assistance to the individual member.

Outcomes of employee satisfaction

To society as a whole as well as from an individual employee's standpoint, job satisfaction in and of

itself is a desirable outcome. It is important to know, if at all, satisfaction relates to outcomes


variable. For example, if job satisfaction is high, will the employee perform better and the

organization be more effective? I f job satisfaction is low, will there be performance problems and

ineffectiveness? The following sections examine the most important of these.


Satisfaction and performance:

Most assume a positive relationship; the research to date indicates that there is no strong linkage

between satisfaction and performance. Conceptual, methodological, and empirical analyses have

questioned and argued against these results.The best conclusion about satisfaction and performance

is that there is, definitely a relationship. The relationship may even be more complex than others in

organization behaviour. For example, there seem to be many possible-moderating variables, the most

important of which is reward. If people receive reward they feel are equitable, they will be satisfied,

and is likely to result in greater performance effort.

Satisfaction and turnover:

Unlike that between satisfaction and performance, research has uncovered a moderately negatively

relationship between satisfaction and turnover. High job satisfaction will not, in and of itself, keep

turnover low, but it does seem to help. On the other hand, if there is considerable job dissatisfaction,

there is likely to be high turnover. Obviously, other variables enter into an Employees decision to

quit besides job satisfaction. For example, age tenure in the organization, and commitments to the

organization, may play a role. Some people cannot see themselves working anywhere else, so they

remain regardless of how dissatisfied they feel.

Another factor is the general economy, typically there will be an increase in turnover because will

being looking for better opportunities with other organization.

Satisfaction and absenteeism:

Research has only demonstrated a weak negative relationship between satisfaction and absenteeism.

As with turnover, many variables enter into the decision to stay home besides satisfaction with the

job. For example, there are moderating variables such as the degree to which people that there job

are important. For example, research among state govt. Employees has found those who believed

that there was important had lower absenteeism than did who did not feel this way. Additionally, it is
important to remember that although job satisfaction will not necessarily result in absenteeism, low

job satisfaction more likely to bring about absenteeism.

Employee satisfaction is closely relatred to Job satisfaction. In the next few paragraphs, I am going

to discuss Job satisfaction at length.

Job satisfaction describes how content an individual is with his or her job. It is a relatively recent

term since in previous centuries the jobs available to a particular person were often predetermined by

the occupation of that person’s parent. There are a variety of factors that can influence a person’s

level of job satisfaction. Some of these factors include the level of pay and benefits, the perceived

fairness of the promotion system within a company, the quality of the working conditions, leadership

and social relationships, the job itself (the variety of tasks involved, the interest and challenge the job

generates, and the clarity of the job description/requirements).

The happier people are within their job, the more satisfied they are said to be. Job satisfaction is not

the same as motivation, although it is clearly linked. Job design aims to enhance job satisfaction and

performance methods include job rotation, job enlargement and job enrichment. Other influences on

satisfaction include the management style and culture, employee involvement, empowerment and

autonomous workgroups. Job satisfaction is a very important attribute which is frequently measured

by organizations. The most common way of measurement is the use of rating scales where

employees report their reactions to their jobs. Questions relate to relate of pay, work responsibilities,

variety of tasks, promotional opportunities the work itself and co-workers. Some questioners ask yes

or no questions while others ask to rate satisfaction on 1 – 5 scale 9where 1represents “not all

satisfied” and 5 represents “extremely satisfied”).

Definitions

Job satisfaction has been defined as a pleasurable emotional state resulting from the appraisal of

one’s job; an affective reaction to one’s job; and an attitude towards one’s job. Weiss (2007) has

argued that job satisfaction is an attitude but points out that researchers should clearly distinguish the

objects of cognitive evaluation which are affect (emotion), beliefs and behaviors. This definition
suggests that we from attitudes towards our jobs by taking into account our feelings, our beliefs, and

our behaviors.

Affect Theory

Edwin A. Lockes Range of Affect Theory (1976) is arguably the most famous job satisfaction model.

The main premises of this theory is that satisfaction is determined by a discrepancy between what

one wants in a job and what one has in a job. Further, the theory states that how much one values a

given facet of work (e.e. the degree of autonomy in a position) moderates how satisfied/dissatisfied

one becomes when expectations are/are not met. When a person values a particular facet of a job, his

satisfaction is more greatly impacted both positively (when expectations are met) and negatively

(when expectations are not met), compared to one who does not value that facet. To illustrate, if

Employee A values autonomy in the workplace and Employee B is indifferent about autonomy, then

Employee A would be more satisfied in a position that offers a high degree of autonomy compared to

Employee B. this theory also states that too much of a particular facet will produces stronger feelings

of dissatisfaction the more a worker values that facet.

Dispositional Theory

Another well known job satisfaction theory is the Dispositional Theory. It is a very general theory

that suggests that people have innate dispositions that cause them to have tendencies toward a certain

level of satisfaction, regardless of one’s job. This approach became a notable explanation of job

satisfaction in light evidence that job satisfaction tends to be stable over time and across careers and

jobs. Research also indicates that identical twins have similar levels of job satisfaction. A significant

model that narrowed the scope of the Dispositional Theory was the core Self-evaluations Model,

proposed by Timorthy A. Judge in 1998. Judge argued that there are four Core Self-evaluations that

determine one’s disposition towards job satisfaction: self-esteem, general self-efficacy, locus of

control, and neuroticism. This model states that higher levels of self-esteem (the value one places on

his self) and general self-efficacy (the belief in one’s own competence) lead to higher work

satisfaction. Having an internal locus of control (believing one has control over her/his own life, as
opposed to outside forces having control) leads to higher job satisfaction. Finally, lower levels of

neuroticism lead to higher job satisfaction.

Two – Factor Theory (Motivation – Hygiene Theory)

Fredrick Herzberg’s Two factor theory (also known as Motivator Hygiene Theory) attempts to

explain satisfaction and motivation in the workplace. This theory states that satisfaction and

dissatisfaction are driven by different factors motivation and hygiene factors, respectively.

Motivating factors are those aspects of the job that make people want o perform, and provide people

with satisfaction. These motivating factors are considered to be intrinsic to the job, or the work

carried out. Motivating factors include aspects of the working environment such as pay, company

policies, supervisory practices, and other working conditions. While Herzberg’s model has

stimulated much research, researchers have been unable to reliably empirically prove the model, with

Hackman & Oldham suggesting that Herzberg’s original formulation of the model may have been a

methodological artifact. Furthermore, the theory does not consider individual differences, conversely

predicting all employees will react in an identical manner to changes in motivating/hygiene factors.

Finally, the model has been criticized in that it does not specify how motivating/hygiene factors are

to be measured.

Measuring Job Satisfaction

There are many methods for measuring job satisfaction. By far, the most common method for

collecting data regarding job satisfaction is the Likert scale (named after Rensis Likert). Other less

common methods of for gauging job satisfaction include: Yes/No questions, True/False questions,

point systems, checklist, forced choice answers. The Job Descriptive Index (JDI), created by smith,

Kendall, & Hulin (1969), job satisfaction that has been widely used. It measures one’s satisfaction in

five facets: pay, promotions and opportunities, coworkers, supervision, and the work itself. The scale

is simple, participants answer either yes, no, or decide in response to whether given statements

accurately describe one job. The Job in General Index is an overall measurement of job satisfaction.
It was an improvement to the job Descriptive Index because the JDI focused too much on individual

facets and not enough on work satisfaction in general.


OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

 To study the job satisfaction levels among the employees of Aditya Birla Retail limited

 To study the various factors affecting employee satisfaction.

 To analyses the current satisfaction level of the employees in the company.

 To study the satisfaction level of employees regarding resources provided by the manager.

 To know whether organization takes employees suggestions.

 To study about sufficient opportunities to improve employees skills.

 To study the satisfaction level of employees regarding infrastructure of the company.

 To know about supportiveness of superiors.

 To suggest measures for improvement

 To examine the importance given by employees to their work & the level of their satisfaction.

 To find out whether the changes in technology in Aditya Birla Retail Limited have been

properly matched by training & development of its manpower.

 To study the satisfaction level towards trainers.

 To increase the overall satisfaction of an employee


RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Data Collected

Primary data

It consisted of the first hand source of data collected through the questionnaires from the

respondents.

Secondary data

The theoretical foundation of the study is based on various secondary sources such as:

Internet & Booklet of Aditya Birla Retail Limited.

Research Used in this study

Descriptive Research

Descriptive Research includes survey and fact findings enquiries of different kinds. The major

purpose of descriptive research is description of the state of affairs as it exists at present.

In this study I am used the descriptive method I find the current situation of the company.
SAMPLE DESIGN

Non-probability sampling

Non-probability sampling is that sampling procedure which does not afford any basis for

estimating the probability that each item in the population has of being included in the sample.

CONVENIENCE SAMPLING

SAMPLE SIZE

Sample size 50 respondents.

Statistical Tools Used In Research

 Percentage analysis

 Chi-square

 Anova (one way)

 Correlation
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS

1.AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

NO OF

AGE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE


18 to 25 46 92.0
26to35 4 8.0
Total
50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 92% of the respondents were 18 to 25 Age group, 08% of

the respondents were 26 to 35 age group.


Age Of The Respondents

2.GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

NO OF

GENDER RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE


Male 12 24.0
Female 38 76.0
Total 50 100.0

INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 76% of the respondents were females, 24% of the

respondents were male.

Gender Of The Respondents

3. EXPERIENCE

YEAR OF NO OF

EXPERIENCE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE


BELOW 1 YEAR 33 66.0
1-2 YEARS 15 30.0
ABOVE 2 YEARS 2 4.0
Total
50 100.0
INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 66% of the respondents were below 1 year,30% of the

respondents were 1-2 yrs , 4% of the respondents were above 2yrs

Experience

4.DESIGNATION

NO OF PERCENTAG

DESIGNATION RESPONDENTS E
CSA 42 84.0
SENIOR CSA OR L1 GRADE
8 16.0
SUPERVISOR
Total 50 100.0

INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 84% of the respondents were in the designation of CSA, 16%

of the respondents were senior CSA i.e L1 Grade .

Designation

5.QUALIFICATION

NO OF

QUALIFICATION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE


SSLC 20 40.0
HSC 20 40.0
DEGREE 10 20.0
Total 50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table 40% 0f the respondents were in sslc qualified ,40% of the respondents were

hsc qualified,20% of the respondents were degree qualified.


Qualification
6. TENURE

TENURE Frequency PERCENTAGE


PERMANENT
43 86.0
TEMPORARY
7 14.0
Total
50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 86% of the respondents were permanent employees,14%

were temporary employees.

Tenure
7.MARITAL STATUS

NO OF

MARITAL STATUS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE


MARRIED
8 16.0

UNMARRIED
42 84.0

Total
50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 84% of the respondents were unmarried, 16%of the

respondents were married.

Marital Status
8.EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT COMMUNICATION AMONG STAFF IN THIS

STORE IS EFFECTIVE

NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

STRONGLY AGREE 47 94.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 01 2.0

NEUTRAL 02 4.0

DISAGREE 0 0.0

STRONGLY 0 0.0
DISAGREE

TOTAL 50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 94%of the respondents were strongly agree, 2%

of the respondents were somewhat agree , 4% of the respondents were neutral, 0% of the

respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were strongly disagree.

Employees Opinion About Communication Among Staff In This Store Is Effective


9.EMPLOYEES OPION ABOUT THEY FEEL THEY WERE VALUED PART OF THIS

STORE

SCALE NO OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS

STRONGLY AGREE 41 82.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 04 8.0

NEUTRAL 05 10.0

DISAGREE 0 0.0

STRONGLY DISAGREE 0 0.0

TOTAL 50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 82%of the respondents were strongly agree, 8% of

the respondents were somewhat agree ,10 % of the respondents were neutral, 0% of the respondents

were disagree, 0% of the respondents were strongly disagree.

Employee's opinion about them feel

They were valued part of this store


10.EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE STORE ATMOSPHERE IS GENERALLY

FRIENDLY

SCALE NO OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS

STRONGLY AGREE 33 66.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 13 26.0

NEUTRAL 04 8.0

DISAGREE 0 0.0

STRONGLY DISAGREE 0 0.0

TOTAL 50 100.0

INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 66%of the respondents were strongly agree, 26%
of the respondents were somewhat agree , 8% of the respondents were neutral, 0% of the
respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were strongly disagree.

Employee's opinion about

The store atmosphere is generally friendly


11. EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT PROMOTING RESPECT AND FAIR TREATMENT

AMONG ALL STAFF IS HIGH PRIORITY OF THIS STORE

SCALE NO OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS

STRONGLY AGREE 30 60.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 12 24.0

NEUTRAL 08 16.0

DISAGREE 0 0.0

STRONGLY DISAGREE 0 0.0

TOTAL 50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 60 %of the respondents were strongly agree,

24% of the respondents were somewhat agree , 16% of the respondents were neutral, 0% of the

respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were strongly disagree

Employees Opinion About Promoting Respect And Fair Treatment Among All Staff Is High

Priority In This Store


12.EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE STORE HAS POLICIES THAT ARE SUPPORTIVE

TO ITS STAFF

SCALE NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 28 56.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 17 34.0

NEUTRAL 05 10.0

DISAGREE 0 0.0

STRONGLY DISAGREE 0 0.0

TOTAL 50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 56 %of the respondents were strongly agree, 34%

of the respondents were somewhat agree , 10% of the respondents were neutral, 0% of the

respondents were disagree, 0% of the respondents were strongly disagree.

Employees opinion about the store has policies

That are supportive to its staff


13.EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT THE WORKLOAD IN THIS STORE IS

DISTRIBUTED EQUITABLY

SCALE NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 34 68.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 10 20.0

NEUTRAL 04 8.0

DISAGREE 0 0.0

STRONGLY 02 4.0
DISAGREE

TOTAL 50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 68%of the respondents were strongly agree, 20%

of the respondents were somewhat agree, 8% of the respondents were neutral, 0% of the

respondents were disagree, 4% of the respondents were strongly disagree.

Employee's opinion about the workload

In this store is distributed equitably

14.EMPLOYEE OPINION ABOUT THEY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS EXPECTED OF

THEM AS AN EMPLOYEE
SCALE NO OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS

STRONGLY AGREE 35 70.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 12 24.0

NEUTRAL 03 6.0

DISAGREE 0 0.0

STRONGLY 0 0.0
DISAGREE

TOTAL 50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 70% of the respondents were strongly agree, 24%

of the respondents were somewhat agree ,6% of the respondents were neutral,0% of the respondents

were disagree,0% of the respondents were strongly disagree.

Employee opinion about they know exactly

What is expected of them as an employee?

15. EMPLOYEES OPINION ABOUT HOW THEIR JOB PERFORMANCE IS MEASURED


NO OF
SCALE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

STRONGLY AGREE 33 66.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 13 26.0

NEUTRAL 04 8.0

DISAGREE 0 0.0

STRONGLY DISAGREE 0 0.0

TOTAL 50 100.0

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that 66%of the respondents were strongly agree, 26%

of the respondents were somewhat agree , 8% of the respondents were neutral,0% of the respondents

were disagree, 0% of the respondents were strongly disagree.

Employees opinion about conflict among staff

In store is managed effectively

CHI-SQUARE TEST NO : 1

AGE VS I FEEL I AM A VALUED PART OF THIS STORE


Chi-Square Tests

Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)


Pearson Chi-Square
7.847(a) 2 .020

Likelihood Ratio
5.164 2 .076
Linear-by-Linear
5.500 1 .019
Association

Ho : Null hypothesis i.e There is no relationship between age and employees feel that they

were valued part of this store

H1:Alternative hypothesis i.e there is a relationship between age and employees feel that they

were valued part of this store.

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that the chi-square value is less than 0.05.

Reject Ho .there is a relationship between age and employees feel that they were valued part of this

store.

Chi-Square Test No: 2

AGE VS PROBLEMS ARE MANAGED EFFECTIVELY IN THIS STORE WHEN THEY

ARISE
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value Df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
13.445(a) 2 .001
Likelihood Ratio 8.865 2 .012
Linear-by-Linear
7.379 1 .007
Association
N of Valid Cases
50

a 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .08.

Ho: Null hypothesis i.e there is no relationship between age and Problems are managed

effectively in this store.

H1: Alternative hypothesis i.e there is a relationship between age and problems are managed

effectively in this store.

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that the chi-square value is less than 0.05. .

Reject Ho .there is a relationship between age and problems are managed effectively in this store.

CHI-SQUARE TEST NO : 3

DESIGNATION VS DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES IN THIS STORES ARE

CONSISTENTLY ENFORCED
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value Df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
5.837(a) 2 .054
Likelihood Ratio 8.564 2 .014
Linear-by-Linear
4.941 1 .026
Association
N of Valid Cases
50

3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.28.

Ho: Null hypothesis i.e there is no relationship between Designation and disciplinary

procedures in this store are consistently enforced.

H1: Alternative hypothesis i.e there is a relationship between Designation and disciplinary

procedures in this store are consistently enforced.

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that the chi-square value is not greater than 0.05.

Reject Ho .there is a relationship between Designation and disciplinary procedures in this store are

consistently enforced.
CHI-SQUARE TEST NO: 4

QUALIFICATION VS COMMUNICATION AMONG STAFF IN THIS STORE IS

EFFECTIVE

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.787(a) 4 .044
Likelihood Ratio 8.567 4 .073
Linear-by-Linear
5.147 1 .023
Association
N of Valid Cases
50

a 6 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .20.

Ho: Null hypothesis i.e there is no relationship between Qualification and communication

among staff in this store is effective

H1: Alternative hypothesis i.e there is a relationship between Qualification and communication

among staff in this store is effective.

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that the chi-square value is less than 0.05.

Reject Ho .there is a relationship between Qualification and communication among staff in this store

is effective.

ANOVA TEST NO: 1


Oneway

Descriptive

I FEEL I AM A VALUED PART OF THIS STORE

Std. Std. 95% Confidence

N Mean Deviation Error Interval for Mean Minimum Maximum


Lower Upper

Bound Bound
18to25 46 4.78 .554 .082 4.62 4.95 3 5
26 to 35 4 4.00 1.155 .577 2.16 5.84 3 5
Total 50 4.72 .640 .091 4.54 4.90 3 5

ANOVA

I FEEL I AM A VALUED PART OF THIS STORE

Sum of Mean

Squares Df Square F Sig.


Between
2.254 1 2.254 6.069 .017
Groups
Within Groups
17.826 48 .371

Total
20.080 49

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that the anova significant value is less than 0.05.
Reject Ho, not only that the mean value is high in the 18 to 25 age group they were more feel that

valued part of this store.


ANOVA TEST NO :2

Oneway

Descriptive

PROBLEMS ARE MANAGED EFFECTIVELY IN THIS STORE WHEN THEY ARISE

Std. 95% Confidence

N Mean Deviation Std. Error Interval for Mean Minimum Maximum


Lower Upper

Bound Bound
18to25 46 4.87 .400 .059 4.75 4.99 3 5
26 to 35 4 4.25 .500 .250 3.45 5.05 4 5
Total 50 4.82 .438 .062 4.70 4.94 3 5

ANOVA

PROBLEMS ARE MANAGED EFFECTIVELY IN THIS STORE WHEN THEY ARISE

Sum of Mean

Squares Df Square F Sig.


Between
1.413 1 1.413 8.510 .005
Groups
Within Groups 7.967 48 .166
Total 9.380 49

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that the anova significant value is less than 0.05.

Reject Ho , not only that the mean value is high in the 18 to 25 age group they were more accept

problems are managed effectively in this store..


ANOVA TEST NO -3

Onaway

Descriptive

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES IN THIS STORES ARE CONSISTENTLY ENFORCED


Std. Std. 95% Confidence Minimu Maximu

N Mean Deviation Error Interval for Mean m m


Lower Upper

Bound Bound
CSA 42 4.29 .864 .133 4.02 4.55 3 5
SENIOR CSA

OR L1
8 5.00 .000 .000 5.00 5.00 5 5
GRADE

SUPERVISOR
Total 50 4.40 .833 .118 4.16 4.64 3 5
ANOVA

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES IN THIS STORES ARE CONSISTENTLY ENFORCED

Sum of Mean

Squares Df Square F Sig.


Between
3.429 1 3.429 5.383 .025
Groups
Within Groups 30.571 48 .637
Total 34.000 49

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that the anova significant value is less than 0.05.

Reject Ho. not only that the mean value is high in the designation of senior CSA. They were more

follow the disciplinary procedures in this store.


ANOVA TEST NO :4

Onaway

Descriptive

COMMUNICATION AMONG STAFF IN THIS STORE IS EFFECTIVE

Std. 95% Confidence Minimu Maximu

N Mean Deviation Std. Error Interval for Mean m m


Lower Upper

Bound Bound
SSLC 20 5.00 .000 .000 5.00 5.00 5 5
HSC 20 4.95 .224 .050 4.85 5.05 4 5
DEGREE 10 4.60 .843 .267 4.00 5.20 3 5
Total 50 4.90 .416 .059 4.78 5.02 3 5

ANOVA

COMMUNICATION AMONG STAFF IN THIS STORE IS EFFECTIVE

Sum of Mean

Squares Df Square F Sig.


Between
1.150 2 .575 3.677 .033
Groups
Within Groups 7.350 47 .156
Total 8.500 49

INFERENCE

From the above table it is inferred that the anova significant value is less than 0.05.

Reject Ho , not only that mean value is high in the sslc qualified workers ,they were more priority

to the communication among staff in this store.


QUESTIONNAIRE

Dear Respondent,

We are the students of M.B.A. and we are conducting a survey on the employee satisfaction with the

performance appraisal. You are kindly requested to give your feedback. The data collected will be

used only for academic purpose.

Please tick ( ) the relevant option:-

 Gender: 1) Male 2) Female


 Age: 1) 15-30 2) 30-50 3) 50 above
 Marital status: 1) Single 2) Married

 Education:
1) Under Matriculation
2) Intermediate
3) Graduate
4) Post Graduate
5) Other________

 Experience: 1) below 5 years 2) 5 to 10 years 3) above 10 years


Organizational Details

1. Do you enjoy your work?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly Dissatisfied

2. Are you satisfied with the infrastructure provided by your company?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly Dissatisfied

3. Do you find your HOD/superiors as being helping and supportive?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly Dissatisfied

4. Do you get sufficient opportunities to improve your skills?

A) Highly satisfied
B) Satisfied

C) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly Dissatisfied

5. Do you get regular Feedback from your supervisor regarding your performance?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly Dissatisfied

6. Whether your organization takes your suggestion seriously?

A) Frequently

B) Rarely

C) Occasionally

7. Does the mission and vision of the organization related to your individual mission and goal?

A) Always

B) Mostly

C) Sometimes

D) Rarely

E) Not at all
8. Does your manager promote innovation at job?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly Dissatisfied

9. Do you agree the regular family programmers should be organized?

A) Highly agree

B) Agree

C) Neither agree nor disagree

D) Disagree

E) Highly Disagree

10. Do you fatigue while performing your job?

A) Yes

B) No

11. Have you ever undertaken any training module?

A) Yes

B) No

12. Rate the satisfaction level towards trainers of your organization?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neutral
D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly Dissatisfied

13. Are you satisfied with the level of trust the manager shows towards the team?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neutral

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly Dissatisfied

14. Are you satisfied with the resources provided by your manager to complete your work

efficiently?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neutral

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly dissatisfied

15. In totality are you satisfied with your job?

A) Highly satisfied

B) Satisfied

C) Neutral

D) Dissatisfied

E) Highly dissatisfied
FINDINGS

 To verify the satisfaction level on working environment in the organization.

 Majority of the employees (94%) like their job in this company.

 In this study most of the respondents (78%) follow the disciplinary procedures in this

company

 There is a negative correlation between age and employees feeling valued as part of the

store .it shows the increasing age of the employees decrease the feeling of being valued to some

extent.

 There is a negative correlation between age and problems are managed effectively in this

store, it shows that the increasing age of the employees affect the effectively managed problems

in this store.

 There is a positive correlation between designation and disciplinary procedures followed in

this store. i.e As the designation increases the disciplinary procedures are strictly followed

 As the qualification increases the effective communication decreases to some extent, which

may provide that increased qualification makes lesser efforts to effective communication in this

store.

According to percentage analysis says

 96% of the employees were good opinion about the communication among the staff

 90% of the employees were feel that they were valued part of this store

 92% of the employees were good opinion about the store atmosphere is convenient and likely

to work.

 74% of the employees were satisfied about the promoting respect and fair treatment among

all staff is high priority in this store.

 90% of the respondents were good opinion about the store has policies supportive to its staff.
 78% of the respondents were follow the disciplinary procedures.

 82% of the respondents were opinion about workload and expected time completions are

reasonable.

 96% of the respondents were opinion about the workload in this store distributed equitably.

 94% of the respondent's opinion about they know exactly what is expected of them as an

employee.

 92% of the employees were highly satisfied about their job performance is measured.

 98% of the employees satisfied about conflict among staff in store is managed effectively

when they arise.

 96% of the employee's opinion about the store run effectively.

 94% of the employees were good opinion about others in this store trust me to perform their

job.

 98% of the respondents says communication with others in this store is good.

 66% of the employees were opinion about the store training is more effective.

 94% of the employees are very like their job

 98% of the employee's opinion about them like wok with people.
SUGGESTIONS

 In order to improve the skills, and performance of workers a training programmer may be

planned and implemented, specifically to the newcomers.

 To promote respect and fair treatment among all staff in this store.

 Overall employee satisfaction in this ABRL ltd is more satisfied but some areas only to

improved and concentrate. From my point of view in this study.

 External training /seminar related to technical development should be introduced in

organization to increase effectiveness of training programmer.

 HOD/superiors should support to employees.

 Sufficient opportunities should be given to employees to improve their skills.

So to motivate the employees, management should take into consideration some suggestions

given by the employees. It will help to increase the motivation and ultimately the job

satisfaction of the employees.


LIMITATIONS

As far as the LIMITATION of the project is concerned, I faced many a problem and adversities in

course of my project duration.

1. The employees hesitate to disclose the true facts in order to secure their job.

2. It is very time consuming process.


3. Samples are not true representative of the total workforce.
4. Difficulty in getting information from secondary sources.

5. Because of the size of the organization, the population of employee was large. Therefore it

was very tough on my part to conduct the survey by going to them personally.

6. It was also very disappointing for me at times when the feedback given by the employees

were below expectation.

7. The lack of cooperation by the departmental heads to which the responsibility of handling

the questionnaire was given was one of the most important factor which leaded to de

motivation and exhortation.


ANNEXURE

1. Personal Details

Name :

Age :

Gender :

Total Year of Experience :

Joining Date :

Designation :

Permanent /Temporary :

From Where they coming from :

………………km Distance

Married / unmarried

Spouse Work?

No.of.children

2. Communication among staff in this store is effective?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

3. I Feel I am valued part of this store?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

4. The stores atmosphere is generally friendly?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral


D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

5. Promoting respect and fair treatment among all staff is a high priority in this store?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

6. This store has Policies that are supportive to its staff?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

7. Disciplinary Procedures in this stores are consistently enforced?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

8. My workload and expected completion times are reasonable?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

9. The workload in this stories distributed equitably?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

10. I know exactly what is expected of me as an employee?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

11. I have clear understanding of how my job performance is measured?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

12. My store’s Leader has a clear understanding of how my job performance is measured?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree


13. Conflict among staff in store is managed effectively?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

14. Problems are managed effectively in the store when they arise?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree

15. Overall this store is run effectively?

A) strongly agree B) somewhat agree C) neutral

D) Disagree C) Strongly Disagree


BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS REFERRED

1. Prabhi G and Roja Rani Tegala Employee Engagement

(HRM Review The Icfai University aug 2009).

2. Venkoba Rao Employee Engagement in Indian ITes –BPO industry. (HRM Review

The Icfai University Jan 2008)

3. P.V Raveendra & UM Premalatha Making ‘Gems’ Through Employee Engagement. .

(HRM Review the Icfai University June 2008)

WEBSITE

 Managementstudy.com

 citehr.com

You might also like