Professional Documents
Culture Documents
t.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 ViEWS.................................................................................................................................................... 3
2 BASIC LOADS...................................................................................................................................... 26
3 LOAD COMBINATIONS........................................................................................................................ 26
4 UTILITY RATIO..................................................................................................................................... 27
5 PIPE RACK POST FOUNDATION DESIGN..........................................................................................30
6 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................................... 32
1 VIEWS
Pipe Rack T-Post
Dead Load Application
Live (Operating/Hydro) Load Application
Wind Load Application – X Dir.
Wind Load Application – Z Dir.
Seismic Load Application Application – X Dir.
Seismic Load – Z Dir.
Pipe Support at Roof
Dead Load Application
Live (Operating/Hydro) Load Application
Wind Load Application – X Dir.
Number Name
1 SL(+)X
2 SL(+)Z
3 DL
4 LL(OPE)
5 WL(+)X
6 WL(+)Z
3 LOAD COMBINATIONS
Primar
Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary L/C Name Factor
y
101 1.4 DL 3 DL 1.40
102 1.2DL+1.6LL 3 DL 1.20
4 LL(OPE) 1.60
103 1.2DL+0.8WL(+)X 3 DL 1.20
5 WL(+)X 0.80
104 1.2DL+0.8WL(+)Z 3 DL 1.20
6 WL(+)Z 0.80
105 1.2DL+1.6WL(X)+1.0LL 3 DL 1.20
5 WL(+)X 1.60
4 LL(OPE) 1.00
106 1.2DL+1.6WL(Z)+1.0LL 3 DL 1.20
6 WL(+)Z 1.60
4 LL(OPE) 1.00
107 1.2DL+1.0LL+1.0SL(+)X 3 DL 1.20
4 LL(OPE) 1.00
1 SL(+)X 1.00
108 1.2DL+1.0LL+1.0SL(+)Z 3 DL 1.20
4 LL(OPE) 1.00
2 SL(+)Z 1.00
109 0.9DL+1.6WL(+)X 3 DL 0.90
5 WL(+)X 1.60
110 0.9DL+1.6WL(+)Z 3 DL 0.90
6 WL(+)Z 1.60
111 0.9DL+1.0SL(+)X 3 DL 0.90
1 SL(+)X 1.00
112 0.9DL+1.0SL(+)Z 3 DL 0.90
2 SL(+)Z 1.00
201 DL 3 DL 1.00
202 DL+LL 3 DL 1.00
4 LL(OPE) 1.00
203 DL+WL(+)X 3 DL 1.00
5 WL(+)X 1.00
204 DL+WL(+)Z 3 DL 1.00
6 WL(+)Z 1.00
205 DL+0.7SL(+)X 3 DL 1.00
1 SL(+)X 0.70
206 DL+0.7SL(+)Z 3 DL 1.00
2 SL(+)Z 0.70
207 DL+0.75WL(+X)+0.75(LL) 3 DL 1.00
5 WL(+)X 0.75
4 LL(OPE) 0.75
208 DL+0.75WL(+)Z+0.75(LL) 3 DL 1.00
6 WL(+)Z 0.75
4 LL(OPE) 0.75
209 0.6DL+0.7SL(+)X 3 DL 0.60
1 SL(+)X 0.70
210 0.6DL+0.7SL(+)Z 3 DL 0.60
2 SL(+)Z 0.70
211 0.6DL+WL(+)X 3 DL 0.60
5 WL(+)X 1.00
212 0.6DL+WL(+)Z 3 DL 0.60
6 WL(+)Z 1.00
4 UTILITY RATIO
****************************************************
* *
* STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition *
* Version 21.00.02.43 *
* Proprietary Program of *
* Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* Date= MAR 15, 2019 *
* Time= 12:31:28 *
* *
* Licensed to: Barry-Wehmiller International *
****************************************************
1. STAAD SPACE
INPUT FILE: D:\Projects\ASM Phenoix\Pipe Suppports\T-Post_PS at Roof_VL Support at Wall_15032018.STD
2. START JOB INFORMATION
3. ENGINEER DATE 12-MAR-19
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT FEET KIP
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 0 15 0; 3 -1.5 15 0; 4 1.5 15 0; 5 10 30 0; 6 13 30 0; 7 10 32 0
9. 8 13 32 0; 9 10 30 6; 10 13 30 6; 11 10 32 6; 12 13 32 6; 13 23 0 0
10. 14 23 25 0; 18 23 14.5 0; 19 23 18.6667 0; 20 24.5 14.5 0; 21 24.5 18.6667 0
11. MEMBER INCIDENCES
12. 1 1 2; 2 2 4; 3 3 2; 4 7 11; 5 8 12; 6 7 8; 7 11 12; 8 5 7; 9 6 8; 10 9 11
13. 11 10 12; 12 13 18; 16 18 19; 17 19 14; 18 19 21; 19 18 20
14. DEFINE MATERIAL START
15. ISOTROPIC STEEL
16. E 4.28151E+06
17. POISSON 0.3
18. DENSITY 0.489024
19. ALPHA 1.2E-05
20. DAMP 0.03
21. TYPE STEEL
22. STRENGTH FY 5288.19 FU 8517.08 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
23. ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
24. E 453600
25. POISSON 0.17
26. DENSITY 0.14999
27. ALPHA 1E-05
28. DAMP 0.05
29. TYPE CONCRETE
30. STRENGTH FCU 576
31. END DEFINE MATERIAL
32. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
33. 1 TABLE ST HSST7X7X0.5
34. 2 3 TABLE ST W6X20
35. 4 TO 7 TABLE ST W6X9
36. 8 TO 11 TABLE ST PIPS30
37. 18 19 TABLE ST W6X9
38. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 2
*** NOTE: If any floor diaphragm is present in the model Wind Load definition
should be defined after Floor Diaphragm definition. Otherwise wind
load generation may be unsuccessful during analysis.
*****************************************************************************
* EQUIV. SEISMIC LOADS AS PER IBC 2012 *
* PARAMETERS CONSIDERED FOR SUBSEQUENT LOAD GENERATION *
* SS = 0.178 S1 = 0.065 FA = 1.600 FV = 2.400 *
* SDS = 0.190 SD1 = 0.104 *
*****************************************************************************
62. SELFWEIGHT 1
63. JOINT WEIGHT
64. 2 WEIGHT 1
65. MEMBER WEIGHT
66. *6 7 CON GX 0.018 0.5
67. 6 7 CON 0.667 0.5
68. *6 7 CON GZ -0.02 0.5
69. 6 7 CON 0.007 2.5
70. 6 7 CON 0.618 2.5
71. *6 7 CON GZ -0.002 2.5
72. 18 CON 0.57
73. *18 CON GZ 0.006
74. *18 CON GX -0.007
75. 19 CON 0.564
76. *19 CON GZ -0.004
77. ****
78. JOINT WEIGHT
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 3
PROBLEM STATISTICS
-----------------------------------
************************************************************
* IBC 2012 SEISMIC LOAD ALONG X : *
* CT = 0.028 Cu = 1.692 x = 0.8000 *
* TIME PERIODS : *
* Ta = 0.448 T = 0.529 Tuser = 0.000 *
* TIME PERIOD USED (T) = 0.529 *
* Cs LIMITS : LOWER = 0.010 UPPER = 0.056 *
* LOAD FACTOR = 1.000 *
* DESIGN BASE SHEAR = 1.000 X 0.054 X 17.84 *
* = 0.97 KIP *
************************************************************
************************************************************
* IBC 2012 SEISMIC LOAD ALONG Z : *
* CT = 0.028 Cu = 1.692 x = 0.8000 *
* TIME PERIODS : *
* Ta = 0.448 T = 1.274 Tuser = 0.000 *
* TIME PERIOD USED (T) = 0.758 *
* Cs LIMITS : LOWER = 0.010 UPPER = 0.039 *
* LOAD FACTOR = 1.000 *
* DESIGN BASE SHEAR = 1.000 X 0.039 X 17.84 *
* = 0.70 KIP *
************************************************************
184. PARAMETER 1
185. CODE AISC UNIFIED 2010
186. CAN 1 MEMB 1 TO 3
187. FU 8640.05 ALL
188. FYLD 5184.03 ALL
189. FYLD 5184.03 MEMB 1 TO 3
190. KY 2 MEMB 1 TO 3 12 16 TO 19
191. KZ 2 MEMB 1 TO 3 12 16 TO 19
192. METHOD LRFD
193. TRACK 0 MEMB 1 TO 3
194. CHECK CODE ALL
STEEL DESIGN
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 7
195. FINISH
************************************************************
* For technical assistance on STAAD.Pro, please visit *
* http://www.bentley.com/en/support/ *
* *
* Details about additional assistance from *
* Bentley and Partners can be found at program menu *
* Help->Technical Support *
* *
* Copyright (c) 1997-2017 Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* http://www.bentley.com *
************************************************************
6 CONCLUSION
Concluding the analysis and design of the skid structure, we can state that:
Section profiles provided for the pipe supports satisfies the stress ratio limits.