‘The Fragile Contract
University Science and the Federal Government
edited by David H. Guston and Kenneth Keniston
‘The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England(age
1994
(01904 Masiachusets Insti of Technology
All ights reserved, No patof this book may be repreduced in any form or by aay
slecronic or mechanical means (including information storage sd retell without
Permission in writing fromm the publisher
‘This book was atin New Baskerville at The MIT Pres and was printed and bound in
‘the United Sates of Ameria
Library of Congress Catalogingn Publication Duta
‘The Fragile contract / edited by Dad H. Guston and Kenneth Kenison,
ben
les bllogeaphieal references ad inden,
ISHN 020207161-1.— ISBN 0960971072 (pbk)
1. Retearch—Gorerniment polcy—United States. 2. Sclence and
state~Ulted States. "3 Universes and colleges Research
United States. 4: Research ineitater “United States Cason,
Dard 1°11 Keniston, Kenneth
iso.use7s| 994
388.97306—de20 9420557
cir
Acknowledgments
About the Authors
1 Introduction: The Social Contract for Science
David H. Guston and Kenneth Keniston
2. Universities, the Public, and the Government:
‘The State of the Partnership
Charles M. Vest
3. On Doing One’s Damnedest:
The Evolution of Trust in Scientific Findings
Gerald Holton
4 Integrity and Accountability in Research
Patricia Woolf
5 The Public Face of Science:
What Can We Learn from Disputes?
Dovothy Netkin
6 How Large an R&D Enterprise?
Daryl E. Chubin
7. Views from the Benches:
Funding Biomedical Research and the Physical Sciences
Phillip A. Sharp and Daniel Kleppner
8 Financing Science after the Cold War
Harvey M. Sapolsky
9 Indirect Costs and the Government University
Partnership
Peter Likins and Albert H, Teich
42
59
82
101
18
45
159Contents
10 Research in U.S. Universities in a Technologically
Competitive World
Eugene B. Skolnikoff
11 Conclusion: Constructive Responses to the Changing
Social Context of University-Government Relations
Dawid Hamburg
Index
194
Acknowledgments
This volume grew out of a faculty workshop at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) on the relationship between scien-
tific research universities and the federal government. The work
shop brought a wide range of speakers together with a group of
senior MIT faculty members and administrators, many of whom,
‘were charged with negotiating, maintaining, and improving just
the sorts of relationships between science and politics that were
being addressed.
“The format of the workshop wasintended to encourage extensive
interaction. Each speaker's talk was distributed to the participants
in advance of the meetings, held monthly during academic year
1991-1992, often accompanied by additional readings. The work
shops started at5 p.m, Before dinner, the speaker summarized his
or her paper, and discussion focused on questions of fact. After
dinner, one of the regular workshop participants reopened discus-
sion with prepared comments. The ensuing two hours were more
like an extended conversation than a formal question-and-answer
period, with lively and sometimes heated exchanges with the
speaker and among workshop members. A detailed summary of
tite discussion was used by the speakers to help prepare the final
versions of their papers for this volume. (The papers by Gerald
Holton and by Peter Likins and Albert H. Teich were commis:
sioned after the workshop.)
"The editors have incurred many debts during the preparation of
thisvolume. Wegratefully acknowledge thesupportofthe Carnegie