Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syllabus
Writing 2 ACE: Introduction to Academic Writing
Winter 2009
Important Dates:
January 9 (Friday)- Last day to drop Writing 2 via Gold
January 27 (Tuesday)- Portfolio One Due
February 17 (Tuesday)- Portfolio Two Due
March 12 (Thursday)- Final Portfolio Due
Course Website: Our course has its own website through UCSB’s Gaucho Space. In
order to logon to our site, go to https://gauchospace.ucsb.edu/ and click on “Login”
on the upper left-hand side of the screen. You are already a participant in our site, so
just login with your UCSB NetID as a returning user.
Course Description:
Writing 2 is an undergraduate writing course focusing on developing analytical skills,
synthesizing multiple sources, sustaining coherent arguments, and revising for clarity
of style. Reading and writing assignments are drawn from a range of academic
disciplines, including the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the
humanities. More specifically, this course will focus on the theme of “literacy in the
disciplines.” Throughout the quarter we will investigate what it means to be literate
in the specific disciplines and what literacy in that discipline signifies in a larger
cultural context.
Course Objectives:
Upon completion of Writing 2, students will be able to successfully compose college-
level essays in a variety of academic disciplines. Students will demonstrate this
mastery by critically engaging secondary sources in their texts and by integrating
summary, paraphrase, and direct quotations from these sources into their texts.
Students will also be able to obtain these secondary sources through methods of
library research and understand the strategies for the evaluation of these sources,
especially electronic sources. Moreover, students will gain an understanding of the
rules governing and the value of academic honesty and demonstrate this by correctly
citing secondary sources in their work. In addition, students will understand writing
as a process involving multiple drafts and editing. Students will demonstrate their
ability to edit based on their increasing knowledge of grammar, mechanics, and the
conventions of English usage and demonstrate their knowledge in the variation of
sentence structure, clarity of expression, and paragraph development.
Prerequisites:
To be able eligible to take Writing 2, students must have either passed the University
of California Analytical Writing Placement Exam or have passed Writing 1(or an
approved equivalent.)
Grade Breakdown:
Portfolio 1 20%
Portfolio 2 25%
Portfolio 3 30%
Final Reflection 5%
Participation: Writing Logs, freewrites, reading presentations,
and in-class participation 20%
You must complete all assignments in order to pass the class. The course is broken
up into three thematic units:
Unit 1 = Literacy of the Natural Sciences, Chapter 4 of WATW: “Science and
Technology.”
Unit 2 = Literacy of the Social Sciences, Chapter 2 of WATW: “Government and
Politics.”
Unit 3 = Literacy of the Humanities, Chapter 3 of WATW: “Art and Literacy.”
In addition, we may also read relevant academic articles in specific disciplines as well
as articles and handouts concerned with specific aspects of the writing process.
Portfolios: At the end of each unit you will turn in a portfolio. On the day the first
draft is due, please bring two copies of your first draft. Each portfolio will include:
1) a business letter addressed to me explaining the strengths of the paper, the areas
of your paper in which you would improve if you had more time, and your
assessment on the relevancy of the assignment (use Hacker C5-f for the format), 2) a
table of contents of the portfolio, 3) the peer review sheets for your essay, 4) your
first draft, and 5) your final paper. (Additional requirements will be assigned for each
portfolio.)
Writing Logs and Participation Portfolio: At the end of each class meeting,
please turn in the daily freewriting journal you have completed at the beginning of
the class meeting. These will be returned to you in a timely fashion. The complied
daily freewriting journals are not only how I take roll in this course, the entries also
make up a significant part of your participation grade, which is why I refer to the
complied journal entries as your “Participation Portfolio” (please see the sample
freewrite if you have any questions). Additionally, you will be asked to complete
Writing Logs, which are responses to the readings, on a regular basis. Each assigned
Writing Log is noted in the schedule of assignments (please see the sample Writing
Log if you have any questions). I will not remind you to complete these
assignments. It is your responsibility to turn in a freewrite for each class
meeting and a Writing Log for each assigned log in the syllabus. It is your
responsibility to retain these journals and logs in a folder and to turn this
folder in on the last day of the course.
Classroom Polices:
Attendance and Lateness: This class differs significantly from your other first-year
courses. It is largely based on in-class work and cooperative participation.
Therefore, attendance is mandatory. More than one unexcused absence can reduce
your grade by 10%. In-class work for missed days may not be made up. It is your
responsibility to find out what was missed. More than two unexcused absences
may result in a failure of the course. In addition, please make sure that you arrive to
class on time. Arriving to class more than 15 minutes late may result in an
absence for that day. Please notify me in advance if any circumstances will
keep you from meeting your attendance or other requirements
Conferences: The best way to give you immediate feedback on your writing is
through one-on-one conferencing. All students are required to have at least two
conferences with me during the quarter so we can monitor your progress in Writing 2
and help you map out your future in the class. An appointment is recommended
any time you wish to see me during office hours.
CLAS Tutoring: Our class is fortunate enough to have our very own CLAS writing
tutor. You will be expected to meet with the tutor at least three times this quarter:
one visit for every portfolio. You will make your appointments directly with the tutor,
but I will keep track of your visits and include them in your class activities grade. Our
tutor is Jamie Fujimoto and her email is jfujimoto@umail.ucsb.edu.
Cell phones: Please turn off cell phones before entering the classroom as a courtesy
to your fellow students. Note: This policy includes the use of text messaging. Any
student using cell phones in class will be asked to leave the class and marked absent
for the day.
Revision: Students will have the opportunity to revise, only once, one of the final
drafts of the first two papers assigned in the course, in order to improve their overall
grade. Specifics of the revisions, including due dates and influence on original grade,
must be agreed upon between the instructor and student before revision takes place.
Late papers: All papers will be collected on the due date at the beginning of class
on the day they are due. Late papers will not be accepted.
Resources: If you are a student with a documented disability and would like to
discuss special accommodations please contact me during office hours or by email.
For more information and support please call Disabled Students Program (DSP) 893-
2668. Additional support can be found at Counseling & Career Services at 893-4411.
More importantly, academic support, including writing tutors, is available for all UCSB
students at Campus Learning Assistance Service (CLAS) at 893-3269. I strongly
recommend making appointments at CLAS to review drafts of every essay
you turn in during this course.
A final note: Please feel free to contact me at any time during the quarter if you
have questions about the course, the campus, etc. I am a resource for you, so please
just ask me if you have a question or come see me in my office hours.
Tuesday Due: One page summary Read and annotate “Women Scientists: Are
1/13/09 of natural setting and one They Really Different” pages 423-438 and
page reflection; reading “How Should Chemists Think?” pages 438-
presentations and discuss 451. Write one Writing Log for either
essay assignment article. Read C1 in Hacker pages 3-13.
Thursday Sign up for appointment Read and annotate Einstein’s “Religion
1/15/09 with Jamie; reading and Science” pages 451-455, Russell’s
presentations; discuss “Religion and Science” pages 456-461,
essay planning—C1 in “Science and China’s Influence on the
Hacker World” pages 461-464. Write one Writing
Log on one of the three articles.
Tuesday Portfolio One due; sign Revise first draft and compile portfolio.
1/27/09 up for appointment with
Jamie; discuss readings
and essay assignment
Thursday Brainstorm essay topics; Read and annotate “The Declaration of
1/29/09 discuss critique; reading Independence” pages 53-57 and
presentation “Democracy in America” pages 57-64.
Write one Writing Log on either article.
Tuesday First draft of Portfolio Revise first draft and compile portfolio.
2/10/09 Two due-bring two
copies; sign up for
appointment with Jamie;
peer review
Thursday Self revision; reading Read Chapter 3 “Introduction” pages 271-
2/12/09 presentation; work on 274. Read and annotate “What Use is
drafts; review APA in Art?” pages 277-279, “The Cultural
Hacker. Importance of the Arts” pages 279-286
and “Understanding Indian Art” pages 293-
298. Write one Writing Log on either
“Cultural Importance” or “Indian Art.”
Tuesday Portfolio Two due; sign Revise first draft and compile portfolio.
2/17/09 up for appointment with
Jamie; discuss essay topic
Thursday Library Instruction: 9am Read and annotate “Traditional Arts of
2/19/09 Davidson Library 1575 Black Africa” pages 298-301, “Islamic Art:
Calligraphy” pages 301-304, “Introduction
to Poetry” pages 305-306, Heraud’s “Ars
Poetica” pages 310-311, and “Poetry”
pages 311-313. Write one Writing Log on
either “Traditional Arts of Black Africa,”
“Islamic Art: Calligraphy,” or all three
poems.
Tuesday Sign up for appointment Read and annotate “The United Fruit Co.”
2/24/09 with Jamie; brainstorm for pages 313-316, “We Wear the Mask”
drafts; discuss readings pages 316-318, “A Poem about
Intelligence for My Brothers and Sisters”
pages 319-320, “Woman Hanging from the
13th Floor Window” pages 323-325, and
“No Name Woman” pages 336-346.
Thursday Discuss writing about Read A1 in Hacker pages 57-66.
2/26/09 texts
Tuesday
3/3/09
Thursday First draft of Portfolio Read C4 in Hacker 24-36.
3/5/09 Three Due-bring two
copies; peer revision;
work on drafts; perfecting
paragraphs
Tuesday Sign up for appointment Revise first draft and compile portfolio.
3/10/09 with Jamie; work on drafts
Thursday Final reflection; course Revise first draft and compile portfolio and
3/12/09 evaluation; Portfolio any revisions. Compile Participation
Three Due; Portfolio.
Participation Portfolios
Due
Freewriting may seem crazy but actually it makes simple sense. Think of the
difference between speaking and writing. Writing has the advantage of
permitting more editing. But that's its downfall too. Almost everyone
interposes a massive and complicated series of editings between the time the
words start to be born into consciousness and when they finally come of the
end of the pencil or typewriter onto the page. This is partly because
schooling makes us obsessed with the "mistakes" we make in writing. Many
people constantly think about spelling and grammar as they try to write. I
am always thinking about the awkwardness, wordiness, and general
mushiness of my natural verbal product as I try to write down words.
But it's not just "mistakes" or "bad writing" we edit as we write. We also edit
unacceptable thoughts and feelings, as we do in speaking. In writing there is
more time to do it so the editing is heavier: when speaking, there's someone
right there waiting for a reply and he'll get bored or think we're crazy if we
don't come out with something. Most of the time in speaking, we settle for
the catch-as-catch-can way in which the words tumble out. In writing,
however, there's a chance to try to get them right. But the opportunity to get
them right is a terrible burden: you can work for two hours trying to get a
paragraph "right" and discover it's not right at all. And then give up. Editing,
in itself, is not the problem.
Next time you write, notice how often you stop yourself from writing down
something you were going to write down. Or else cross it out after it's been
written. "Naturally," you say, "it wasn't any good." But think for a moment
about the occasions when you spoke well. Seldom was it because you first
got the beginning right. Usually it was a matter of a halting or even a garbled
beginning, but you kept going and your speech finally became coherent and
even powerful. There is a lesson here for writing: trying to get the beginning
just right is a formula for failure--and probably a secret tactic to make
yourself give up writing. Make some words, whatever they are, and then
grab hold of that line and reel in as hard as you can. Afterwards you can
throw away lousy beginnings and make new ones. This is the quickest way to
get into good writing.
The habit of compulsive, premature editing doesn't just make writing hard. It
also makes writing dead. Your voice is damped out by all the interruptions,
changes, and hesitations between the consciousness and the page. In your
natural way of producing words there is a sound, a texture, a rhythm--a
voice--which is the main source of power in your writing. I don't know how it
works, but this voice is the force that will make a reader listen to you. Maybe
you don't like your voice; maybe people have made fun of it. But it's the only
voice you've got. It's your only source of power. You better get back into it,
no matter what you think of it. If you keep writing in it, it may change into
something you like better. But if you abandon it, you'll likely never have a
voice and never be heard.
Taken from Writing Without Teachers. New York: Oxford UP, 1973, 1-7.
Writing Logs are a required long-term part of the learning in this class. You
will be asked to complete a Writing Log for specific readings from WATW, as
outlined in our course schedule. Essentially, Writing Logs are a reflective
response to the readings. These responses can be hand-written (if it is
legible) or typed (preferably the latter) and should be at least a page.
Writing Logs can be complied in the same portfolio folder in which you write
your journal entries. Be sure to bring logs to each class meeting for larger
discussion.
Include:
You may include comments on what is of particular interest to you, how the
article has (or has not) enhanced your understanding of the topic you’ve
read, what the author discusses and whether you agree or disagree, what
you found troubling, confusing or enlightening. The focus of your response is
not as important as showing how you engaged with the reading.
Format:
Each log can either be hand-written or typed and should be at least a page in
length for each night’s assignments. Please include an appropriate heading
and includes the title of the article(s) and the author(s) in a prominent
location (note: please use discipline appropriate formatting for the publishing
information).
Jessie Munoz
March 2, 2009
WRIT 2
Bright
Figure 1
Sample of student writing log
Context
In order to become more familiar with the assigned readings as well as the
act of presenting, we will be sharing in-class, group reading presentations on
readings from the WATW text. This activity will begin to prepare you for
leading classroom discussions, which you will be asked to do many times in
your undergraduate (and graduate) career.
Task
In groups of two, please sign up to present on a collection of assigned
readings (see below). On the day the readings are assigned to the class,
your group will lead the class discussion. Your assignment is to become an
“expert reader” of this text and present it to the rest of the class.
In your group:
• Sign up for a selection of readings with the instructor
• Read the articles several times, in order to become an expert on the
readings
• Present all relevant information from the texts in a 15 minute
presentation, including:
o A summary and an analysis of each reading
o Relevant quotes to illuminate your group’s points
o Stimulating discussion questions (at least 2)
• Optional, but not required: construct a visually appealing handout to
share to the rest of the class (and bring at least 18 copies of the
handout)
Purpose
The goal of this assignment is to gain familiarity with presenting in front of
the class, as well as to continue highlighting the distinction between
summary and analysis. Additionally, reading presentations are a great way
to generate ideas for your essays.
Presentation dates (please sign up with instructor for your group’s date):
Date Readings Students
1/13/09 “Women Scientists: Are
They Really Different”
pages 423-438 and “How
Should Chemists Think?”
pages 438-451
1/15/09 Einstein’s “Religion and
Science” pages 451-455,
Russell’s “Religion and
Assignments
Unit One Literacy of the Natural Sciences:
Portfolio Checklist and Grading Rubric
Audience: High school students from your high school who have not
thought about what it means to be literate in the natural
sciences, and who could benefit from the discussion about
the socio-cultural implications of this type of literacy before
they go to college.
Format: Papers should be composed in a traditional font (Times,
Times New Roman), in 12-point font, contain a traditional
MLA header and citation style, and contain the standard
Word margins. Please proofread your document before
turning it in.
2.
3.
Portfolio Checklist: Please place a checkmark before each item. Please place all
portfolio items into a folder with your name on the front. Be sure to include this
sheet.
____Business Letter ____Table of Contents ____Pre-Essay Assignment
____Rubric
____Peer Review Sheet ____First Draft ____Final Draft
____Blue card
Total: _________/100
*5 = Advanced: strong control and skill in this area; many strengths are present; 4
= Proficient: effective control and skill; strengths outweigh weaknesses; 3 =
Developing equal number of strengths and weaknesses in this area; 2/1 = Needs
Improvement: not yet showing control or skill in this area
Total Unit One Portfolio Grade_____/120 Portfolio in Context of
Final Grade ____/20
Task: In order to continue this critical analysis I would like you to develop a
critique of a government agency, using your primary research as the
foundation of your critique. When analyzing a government agency or site,
focus on the connection between the stated goals of the agency or site, and
the actual results. Evaluate whether the agency or site is effective and/or
successful. Then, analyze what the efficacy of this agency represents in the
context of our current government. In a 5-6 page (double-spaced) essay,
please develop your argument and attempt to persuade your specific
audience to adopt/believe your argument using specific evidence from at
least two articles from the WATW text, the mission statement of your agency,
one primary source, and any other relevant secondary sources.
2.
3.
Portfolio Checklist: Please place a checkmark before each item. Please place all
portfolio items into a folder with your name on the front. Be sure to include this
sheet.
____Business Letter ____Table of Contents ____Pre-Essay Assignment
____Rubric
____Peer Review Sheet ____First Draft ____Final Draft
____Blue card
Total: _________/100
*5 = Advanced: strong control and skill in this area; many strengths are present; 4
= Proficient: effective control and skill; strengths outweigh weaknesses; 3 =
Developing equal number of strengths and weaknesses in this area; 2/1 = Needs
Improvement: not yet showing control or skill in this area
Total Unit Two Portfolio Grade_____/120 Portfolio in Context of Final Grade ____/20
Task: In order to develop this argument, I would like you to develop a genre
highlighted in your Pre-Essay Assignment into a critical synthesis, using the
techniques we have discussed in class. When synthesizing the
implications/effects an artistic genre, focus on the synthesis between your
interest/participation in the genre and the theories of at least two (2)
secondary scholarly texts of the same genre. Do the ideas/opinions of the
scholarly critics coincide with your own? Why or why not? What does your
interest/participation in this genre signify to a larger audience? What are
some of the implications of your literacy in this genre? In a 6-7 page (double-
spaced) essay, please develop your synthesis and attempt to convince your
specific audience of your argument using specific evidence from at least two
articles from the WATW text, two scholarly texts, and your own opinions and
experiences.
2.
3.
Portfolio Checklist: Please place a checkmark before each item. Please place all
portfolio items into a folder with your name on the front. Be sure to include this
sheet.
____Business Letter ____Table of Contents ____Pre-Essay Assignment
____Rubric
____Peer Review Sheet ____First Draft ____Final Draft
____Blue card
Total: _________/100
*5 = Advanced: strong control and skill in this area; many strengths are present; 4
= Proficient: effective control and skill; strengths outweigh weaknesses; 3 =
Developing equal number of strengths and weaknesses in this area; 2/1 = Needs
Improvement: not yet showing control or skill in this area
Total Unit Three Portfolio Grade_____/120 Portfolio in Context of Final Grade
____/30