Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
“Motivation is the result of processes internal or external to the individual that arouses
enthusiasm and persistence to pursue a certain course of action”. Motivated employees are
always looking for better ways to do a job. This statement can apply for corporate strategists
and to production workers who are looking for better ways to do a job. When people actively
seek new ways of doing thing, they usually find them. It is the responsibility of mangers to
make employees look for better ways of doing jobs. An understanding if the nature of
motivation is helpful in this context. A Motivated employee generally is more quality oriented.
This is true whether we are talking about a top manager spending extra time on data gathering
and analysis for a report, or a clerk taking extra care when filing important document. In either
case, the organization benefits, bi-cause individuals in and outside the organization see the
enterprise as quality conscious. A clear understanding of the way motivation works helps a
manager make his employees quality oriented.
Methods of Motivation
The chapter provides a detail description of practice of dairy in India; it covers aspects
like history, milk production, milk cattle population, feed and fodder, import-export and the
future scope of dairy in India. The dairy industry of India has grown from an almost completely
unorganized but vastly complex industry of a large magnitude to an organized industry during
the last 55 years with an annual milk production of about 29 million metric tons in the year
1979-80. India’s milk production in 2001 is forecasted at 81 million tones. In India it took
nearly 30 years to achieve self- sufficiency in milk production. The country had produced 123
million tones of milk in 2010-11, 127.9 million tons in 2011-12. The annual growth rate for
production of milk is increased about 5% in 2011-12 as compared to 2010-11. India continued
to rank third amongst the countries of the world. The first two position being held by Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics and United States of America.
The dairy development in India has twin objectives of increasing total milk supply on
commercial basis and diversifying agricultural structure by developing dairy as a
supplementary or principal occupation which would help increasing the income of the small
and marginal agriculturists and/or landless laborers. Dairy industry occupies an importance
place in Indian economy. It embraces the production of milk, its preparation for sale as well as
manufacture of dairy products.
The growth of Indian dairy section has been spectacular during the past three decades.
The Indian dairy industry is not only a vital producer of an essential food item but it also is one
of the largest employers in the country in both the rural sector as well as the semi urban and
urban region. It gives an opportunity to about eight cores families across India. Apart from the
nutritional importance of milk for human consumption, dairying provides employment to the
vest number of persons with no means of production of their own and put them to productive
work so as to enable them to contribute to the national product and earn their share in it. It
processes tremendous potential for providing employment to the massive rural population. It
can equitably distribute the gain and thus assists even the weakest sections of our society.
Further, milk is one of the few commodities which give the producer a large share of what the
consumer pays for it. Thus, dairying is a very important instrument for the up liftment of the
rural economy of our country. Dairy development on modern lives will generate additional
income and employment in rural areas itself and can act as an effective instrument for social
change in rural India.
The composition of the milk production in India has been dominated by buffalo milk
with 76 percent of the total milk production as compared to 94 percent of cow milk in the total
production of milk in the ward. The importance of cow continues as a supplier of cheap milk
as also bullocks. Livestock keeping in general and dairying in particular has been the integral
part of Indian agriculture. In additional, dairying provides a source of nutrition and additional
income to our farmers.
Inefficient and poor maintenance of large number of cattle in the context of available
resources could be responsible for the fact that although there are 12 percent more dairy
animals in India than four leading countries put together, India produces less than 12 percent of
the milk produced by these leading countries of the world.
1.2.1 DAIRY INDUSTRY IN INDIA
Dairy industry plays a dynamic role in India's agro-based economy. Dairy is now a
highly specialized field today that involves production, procurement, storage, processing and
distribution of dairy products. The dairy industry involves processing raw milk into products
such as consumer milk, butter, cheese, yogurt, condensed milk, skimmed milk powder and ice
cream, using processes such as chilling, pasteurization, and homogenization.
India is the largest producer and consumer of milk in the world. The Indian dairy sector
is characterized by a very large number of small herds. Production of milk from buffaloes
exceeds that of cows, which are considered sacred by Hindus. India has an extensive
government supported dairy cooperative structure. Milk from the small herds is collected by
the cooperatives with centralized cooling facilities and transported to the end-users in urban
centers. Most of the milk produced (over 80%) is distributed as liquid milk for home
consumption or manufacturing of traditional products .India surpassed the US in 1998 with a
production of 92 million tones to become the largest milk producing country in the world. In
2006, India's milk production crossed 100 million tones, representing 15% of world milk
production. From being milk impoverished nation to the top producer has been an astonishing
success.
The dairy scene with an anticipated milk production of 127.9 million tones, an increase
of around 5 per cent over the year 2010-11, India continued to be the Largest milk producing
nation in 2011- 12. This accounted for about 17 per cent of world milk production. More
people in India now consume milk. The 66th Round of National Sample Survey Organization
data on consumer expenditure showed that while 85 per cent of the population in urban areas
consumes milk in their homes, it is 76 per cent in rural areas.
The dairy cooperatives collected 10.5 million tones of milk, an increase of around 10
per cent as compared to 2010-11. Milk marketing by the cooperatives stood at 8.6 million
tones, an increase of around 4 per cent compared to the previous year.
Nanjil Milk Plant is a name to reckon with in today’s dairy manufacturing industry in
India. A company that associates itself with quality and latest technology, Nanjil Milk Plant has
been marketing high quality dairy products under its brand “NANJIL”, which today has
become a trusted name among dairy products. The company is owned and managed by
promoters having over 20 years’ experience in the field of dairy products and have given Nanjil
Milk its standing in the competitive markets. Setting standards of excellence in its entire range
of dairy products, Nanjil Milk is today considered a class apart even by its competitors. It’s
well known brand NANJIL MILK and NANJIL GOLD is a result of this enterprise, thus
creating a league of its own.
Our mission is to have a strong commitment towards integrity, quality and creation of
value for our clients. To deliver quality products comparable to that of global products, our
organization believes in the pursuit of excellence as its guiding force. Every business
proposition we undertake has our seal of quality commitment. Our commitment to quality,
innovation and product integrity have resulted in the trust, loyalty of our diverse clients. A
commitment that we do and we will continue to firmly stand by and deliver.
Nanjil Milk Plant is a name to reckon with in today’s dairy manufacturing industry in
India. A company that associates itself with quality and latest technology, Nanjil Milk Plant has
been marketing high quality dairy products under its brand “NANJIL”, which today has
become a trusted name among dairy products.
The consumption of milk was very low in the villages of kanyakumari district.Because
of high cost, the milk and products are not affordable to poor strata of the society. The
available of fresh milk was also a dream to the kanyakumari District.In order to provide fresh
and poor milk to the village people as well as self-employment.“THE NANJL MILK PLANT”
was established in the year of 2000.
WORKING HOURS
Total period of workers for each employee is fixed irrespective of the nature of
the job and the categories of the workmen. All the employees are required to
work 8 hours in a day.
1 shift - 6 am to 2 pm
2 shifts- 2 pm to 10 pm
3 shifts – 10 pm to 6 am
TOTAL STAFF
The Nanjil Milk Plant is located in a village is called Mulagumoodu which is 20kms
away (west) from the town of Nagercoil, the head quarters of the district.The village is linked
by the National Highway No .47
The Milk Pant is 40 km s away from (west) .Cape Comerin ,the southernmost trip of
India. It also 50kms away from Trivandrum Airport. The nearest railway station is Palliyadi
(5kms) and the nearest Harbor is Colachel (10 kms).The Nanjil Milk Pant is situated in a
Eco- friendly atmosphere.
FIRST STAGE
At first stage the Nanjil milk plant has commenced as a project through kottar
social service society (KSSS). Capturing the market was the only aim in the
beginning .The procurement and sale was the only target in the stage. The long –
term and short –term objectives were created in order to achieve the goal.
SECOND STAGE
Increasing the revenue of the farmers and empowering them to save through a
rotary fund.
Promoting economic and eco-friendly sources of energy.
Increasing the cattle population and their productive potential for a white
revolution.
Training the farmers to raise cattle in a more scientific manner and to produce
clean and quality milk.
Installing a pasteurization plant to ensure regular purchase and to promote dairy
products.
Establishing a commercial network for marketing dairy products.
Agricultural sector is a neglected sector in the Indian sub continent. Though agriculture
is the lifeline base for about 70% of the people of India, it has been sidelined by the various
governments of India. In this context the plight of marginal farmers and the agricultural
laborers is really pathetic. A large section of such people remains under the poverty line. The
situation is not better in Tamil Nadu state or in Kanyakumari district. All the more their
agonies have been intensified due to the scant rainfall and severe drought. This situation has
deeply diminished the fortunes of the farmers and reduced their revenues to a great extent.
They have been placed in utter hopelessness. At this juncture, the Integrated Dairy
Development Programme has come as a heavenly boon for them. The loan assistance,
employment offers and the self-employment opportunities have helped many a family survive
starvation. Moreover, the programme has inculcated the habit of drinking milk and which
makes the people healthy. The cattle population as well as their productivity has been
increased. Quality milk production also has been ensured. The programme has formed able
leaders from among the farmers. The programme is gradually maturing into a prestigious
institution in the pursuit of bringing about a 'WHITE REVOLUTION' in South India.
1.3.4 NANJIL MILK PLANT
Nanjil Milk Plant is a name to reckon with in today’s dairy manufacturing industry in
India. A company that associates itself with quality and latest technology, Nanjil Milk Plant has
been marketing high quality dairy products under its brand “NANJIL”, which today has
become a trusted name among dairy products.
MISSION
Our mission is to have a strong commitment towards integrity, quality and creation of
value for our clients. To deliver quality products comparable to that of global products, our
organization believes in the pursuit of excellence as its guiding force. Every business
proposition we undertake has our seal of quality commitment. Our commitment to quality,
innovation and product integrity have resulted in the trust, loyalty of our diverse clients. A
commitment that we do and we will continue to firmly stand by and deliver.
VISION
The following product by nanjil milk plant ,milk is the main product and the by-
product of milk are aslso produced.
Milk
By-products ghee
Butter milk
Butter
Khova
Yogurt(curd)
Ice-cream
Milk powder
Paneer
MILK
Contains 3.0 % fat and 8.5 % non- fat solid. Ideal for whitening tea/coffee and for the
preparation of solid curd. since the milk homogenized, Whitening capacity is more and less
amount of milk will be sufficient for whitening tea/coffee.The milk will not stick to vessels on
heating and hence washing of used vessels is easier. Fat will not settle at the top since the milk
is homogenized .Available in 500 ml sachets.
PASTEURIZED TONED MILK
Contains 3.0%fat and 8.5 % non-fat solids.fat will settle at the top of milk is kept still
for some times. Available in 500 ml sachets
Contains 1.5 % fat and 9.0 % non –fat solid, Can also whitening tea/coffee and for the
preparation of milk based drinks like fruit shakes. Fat will not settle at the top since the milk is
homogenized. Available in 500 ml
Pasteurized toned milk in which fat is 3.5 % and SNF is 8.5 % milk is also
homogenized to have smaller and uniform fat globules leading to no cream – line formation
,more full-bodied flavor &better mouth feel.
BUTTER MILK
Butter milk is in a ready to dragnets in which natural product such as ginger, salt etc.
are mind or taste. Nanjil butter milk is available in convenient 200 ml throw away packets.
BUTTER
Butter prepared from the cream of milk contains 81% fat and less than the 15.6 %
water. This is available in convenient 100 gm,200gm and 500 gm family packs. Available in
salted and unsalted varieties.
KOHA
It is prepared from milk by adding sugar and boiling it until the required final product is
thicker. It is solid under the brand name Nanjil koha.
YOGURT (CURD)
Yogurt making is a process made from milk. The Nanjil curd is solid in the quantities of
200 ml and 500 ml .
ICE CREAM
Made from pure milk (unlike many private brand who ‘frozen desserts’ “made from
cheap vegetable fats in the guise of ice – cream),this is real ice cream made available in various
flavored and packs .production hygienically in ISO 9001-2008 and HACCP certified
production facility.
MILK POWDER
Dairy whitener is a partially skimmed milk powder with added sugar. It is ideal for
preparation of various delicacies. It can also be used as a whitener from tea and coffee. The
Dairy whitener is packed under Nitrogen and has solubility and a fine granular texture.
GHEE
PANEER
Pannier also called chenna is a milk product made by congulating bold hot whole milk
with citric or lactic acid and subsequent drainage of whey. It is a fresh source of milk protein
and has flavor and smooth texture. It is used in preparation of various dishes.
II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Mehra and Mishra (1991) in their study explored the potential moderator effect
of mental health on the Intrinsic Job Satisfaction-Occupational stress relationship. The
study was conducted on 250 blue collar industrial workers of UPTRON India Ltd. The
findings of the study showed that mental health has a moderating effect on the Intrinsic
Job Satisfaction-Occupational stress relationship.
Dhar and Jain (1992) carried out an investigation amongst academicians. The
investigation explored the nature of relationship between Job Satisfaction, Job
Involvement, Age and Length of service. An important finding of the study was that Job
Involvement and Job Satisfaction are positive correlates which imply that involvement in
Job increases Job Satisfaction and vice-versa.
Syeed (1992), made an endeavour to determine the relationship between
employee Job Satisfaction and Organisational effectiveness. The sample for the study
consisted of 44 supervisors of a public sector undertaking which was randomly drawn
from a single unit of the Company. The main objective of the study was to relate
satisfaction with Organisational effectiveness along with personal attributes such as age,
education, pay, length of service etc. the study revealed that Job satisfaction facets had
more explanatory power than the personal attributes of respondents. It was clear from the
study that the Organisation through its human resource development policies and
practices created better environment for employees, resulting in greater satisfaction
which in turn enhanced Organisational effectiveness.
Rama Devi (1997) conducted a study on faculty Job Satisfaction and their
views on management of the two universities in Andhra Pradesh. The sample
consisting of 200 teaching faculty and 100 members were selected randomly from each
university and the attempt was made to measure Job Satisfaction of the faculty in
universities of Andhra Pradesh. The study found that the factors such as freedom in
job, scope for self-improvement, income and job security were causing satisfaction
while bureaucratic rules, no recognition for work and routine work were causing
dissatisfaction to them.
Sarri and Judges (2004), article provided greater understanding of the research
on employee’s attitudes and Job Satisfaction. The article identified three gaps between
Human resource practice and the scientific research in the area of employee attitudes in
general and the most focal employee attitude in particular –Job satisfaction: the causes of
employee attitudes, the result of positive or negative job satisfaction and how to measure
and influence employee attitudes. Suggestions for practitioners are provided on how to
close the gaps in knowledge and for evaluating implemented practices.
Worrell (2004) examined and described the levels of Job Satisfaction and
relationship between the variables in a national sample of school psychologists belonging
to the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP). Data were collected through
mailed survey packets including a data form including Minnesota Satisfaction
Questionnaire. 234 full time practitioners responded. Result indicated that
90% of school psychologists were satisfied or very satisfied with their jobs. The
findings showed a gradual increase in overall satisfaction when compared to 1982 and
1992 that reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their jobs. Participants in the
current sample were more satisfied with their job security, independence and creativity.
Santhapparaj (2005) studied the Job Satisfaction of the women managers working
in automobile Manufacturing Industry in Malaysia. It was based on primary survey from
200 women managers. The study investigated the relationship between specific aspects of
Job Satisfaction and the personal characteristics of women managers. It was also aimed to
retest the Herzberg’s Two-Factors theory. The correlation analysis showed that there was a
significant negative correlation between education level and pay, promotion people on
present job and job in general. The percentage of overall satisfaction was 75.59%. The
results did not support the Hezberg’s theory and concluded that no separate and distinct
factors lead to job satisfaction or dissatisfaction, but if they were together contributed to
job satisfaction or dissatisfaction. The study reveals that there was a need for change in
the Organisational culture and the management should create the
environment for social and organisational network. The factor which was relatively less
satisfied was the pay and this can be improved only through dialogue which involve cost to
the organisation and the less level of satisfaction on present job could be easily improved
by job rotation, providing challenging job and so on.
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research methodogy is a scientific and systematic to solve research problem. The
methodology adopted for different from one another.
This research was based on the primary data which is collected from the employees
through structured questionnaire.
SECONDARY DATA
The Secondary data was gathered through sources like published reports, brouchers and
journals etc from the company.
SAMPLING SIZE
Out of a total population of 450 employees belonging to various departments, the study
was carried-out by collecting data from 100 respondent.
a) chi-square
b) percentage
c) weighted average method
d) correlation analysis.
a) Could not interact with senior managers because they are always busy with their
work.
b) Due to busy with their work, co-operation of the respondent were less.
c) A minor fraction of the employees were hesitated to reveal the actual data.
IV .DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Table 4.2.1
Age
Below 40 years 53 53
40-45 years 28 28
45-50 years 17 17
Above 50 years 2 2
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
below 40 years 40-45 years 45-50 years above 50 years total
Interpretation:
From the above table found that 100 respondents 53% of them below the age of 40, 28%
of them are between 40-45, 17% of them are between 45-50,2% of them are above the age of 50.
Table 4.2.2 Gender
Male 77 77
Female 23 23
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
male female total
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that out of 100 respondents 77% of them are male
respondents and 23% of them are female respondents.
Table 4.2.3
Marital Status
Married 67 67
Unmarried 33 33
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
married unmarried total
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that out of 100 respondents 67% of them are married
and 33% of them are unmarried.
Table 4.2.4
Educational Qualification
SSLC 41 41
HSC 27 27
Diploma 20 20
Degree 12 12
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.4
Educational Qualification
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
SSLC HSC diploma degree total
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that out of 100 respondents 47% of them are SSLC
and 27% of them are HSC and 20% of them are Diploma and 12% of them are Degree.
Table 4.2.5
Work experience
Below 10 years 10 10
10-15 years 32 32
15-20 years 40 40
Above 20 years 18 18
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
below 10 years 10-15 years 15-20 years above 20 years total
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that out of 100 respondents 40% of them are having
15-20 years, 32% of them are having 10-20 years, 18% of them are having above 20 years and
10% of them are having below 10 years of work experience.
Table 4.2.6 Satisfied with current salary
Strongly Agree 26 26
Agree 34 34
Neutral 38 38
Disagree 2 2
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 26% of the respondents are strongly agree, 34%
of the respondent are agree, 38% of the respondents are neutral and 2% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.7 Co-workers wages
Strongly Agree 30 30
Agree 54 54
Neutral 8 8
Disagree 8 8
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 30% of the respondents are strongly agree, 54%
of the respondent are agree, 8% of the respondents are neutral and 8% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.8 Other people working in same field
Strongly Agree 38 38
Agree 38 38
Neutral 18 18
Disagree 6 6
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 38% of the respondents are strongly agree, 38%
of the respondent are agree, 18% of the respondents are neutral and 6% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.9 Satisfied with health benefits
Strongly Agree 30 30
Agree 44 44
Neutral 22 22
Disagree 4 4
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 30% of the respondents are strongly agree, 44%
of the respondent are agree, 22% of the respondents are neutral and 4% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.10 Company provide with necessary benefits
Strongly Agree 42 42
Agree 24 24
Neutral 26 26
Disagree 8 8
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly toptal
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 42% of the respondents are strongly agree, 24%
of the respondent are agree, 26% of the respondents are neutral and 8% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.11 Company’s benefits options
Strongly Agree 50 50
Agree 30 30
Neutral 12 12
Disagree 8 8
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 50% of the respondents are strongly agree, 30%
of the respondent are agree, 12% of the respondents are neutral and 8% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.12 Compared to other company’s benefits
Strongly Agree 36 36
Agree 46 46
Neutral 10 10
Disagree 8 8
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 36% of the respondents are strongly agree, 46%
of the respondent are agree, 10% of the respondents are neutral and 8% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.13
Flexible working hours, long lunch time, extra vacation days, time off
Strongly Agree 28 28
Agree 50 50
Neutral 12 12
Disagree 8 8
Strongly Disagree 2 2
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.13
Flexible working hours, long lunch time, extra vacation days, time off
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 28% of the respondents are strongly agree, 50%
of the respondent are agree, 12% of the respondents are neutral and 8% of the respondents are
disagree and 2% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.14
Strongly Agree 36 36
Agree 24 24
Neutral 26 26
Disagree 12 12
Strongly Disagree 2 2
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.14
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 36% of the respondents are strongly agree, 24%
of the respondent are agree, 26% of the respondents are neutral and 12% of the respondents are
disagree and 2% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.15
Job security
Strongly Agree 23 23
Agree 37 37
Neutral 24 24
Disagree 16 16
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.15
Job security
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 23% of the respondents are strongly agree, 37%
of the respondent are agree, 24% of the respondents are neutral and 16% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.16
Strongly Agree 8 8
Agree 42 42
Neutral 22 22
Disagree 18 18
Strongly Disagree 10 10
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.16
100
90
80
70
60
Column2
50
Column1
40
Series 1
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 8% of the respondents are strongly agree, 42% of
the respondent are agree, 22% of the respondents are neutral and 18% of the respondents are
disagree and 10% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.17
Strongly Agree 18 18
Agree 22 22
Neutral 10 10
Disagree 30 30
Strongly Disagree 20 20
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.17
100
90
80
70
60
Column2
50
Column1
40
Series 1
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 18% of the respondents are strongly agree, 22%
of the respondent are agree, 10% of the respondents are neutral and 30% of the respondents are
disagree and 20% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.18
Possibilities of promoted
Strongly Agree 18 18
Agree 22 22
Neutral 20 20
Disagree 30 30
Strongly Disagree 10 10
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.18
Possibilities of promoted
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 18% of the respondents are strongly agree, 22%
of the respondent are agree, 20% of the respondents are neutral and 30% of the respondents are
disagree and 10% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.19
Strongly Agree 26 26
Agree 34 34
Neutral 16 16
Disagree 12 12
Strongly Disagree 12 12
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.19
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 26% of the respondents are strongly agree, 34%
of the respondent are agree, 16% of the respondents are neutral and 12% of the respondents are
disagree and 12% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.20
Strongly Agree 34 34
Agree 30 30
Neutral 20 20
Disagree 14 14
Strongly Disagree 2 2
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.20
100
90
80
70
60
Column2
50
Column1
40
Series 1
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 34% of the respondents are strongly agree, 30%
of the respondent are agree, 20% of the respondents are neutral and 14% of the respondents are
disagree and 2% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.21
Strongly Agree 42 42
Agree 24 24
Neutral 26 26
Disagree 6 6
Strongly Disagree 2 2
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.21
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 42% of the respondents are strongly agree, 24%
of the respondent are agree, 26% of the respondents are neutral and 6% of the respondents are
disagree and 2% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.22
Supporting equipment
Strongly Agree 30 30
Agree 36 36
Neutral 28 28
Disagree 4 4
Strongly Disagree 2 2
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.22
Supporting equipment
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 30% of the respondents are strongly agree, 36%
of the respondent are agree, 28% of the respondents are neutral and 4% of the respondents are
disagree and 2% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.23
Strongly Agree 45 45
Agree 34 34
Neutral 20 20
Disagree 1 1
Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.23
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 45% of the respondents are strongly agree, 34%
of the respondent are agree, 20% of the respondents are neutral and 1% of the respondents are
disagree and 0% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.24
Strongly Agree 27 27
Agree 32 32
Neutral 29 29
Disagree 10 10
Strongly Disagree 2 2
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.24
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 27% of the respondents are strongly agree, 32%
of the respondent are agree, 29% of the respondents are neutral and 10% of the respondents are
disagree and 2% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
Table 4.2.25
Strongly Agree 21 21
Agree 43 43
Neutral 20 20
Disagree 8 8
Strongly Disagree 8 8
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
Chart 4.2.25
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree neutral disagree strongly total
agree disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it was found that 21% of the respondents are strongly agree, 43%
of the respondent are agree, 20% of the respondents are neutral and 8% of the respondents are
disagree and 8% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
4.3 WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD
Table 4.3.1
Chart 4.3.1
Interpretation
From the above table, it was found the most of the respondents find the usually nice to
come to work are satisfactory so, it is ranked I, then the opinion of feeling of self-fulfillment
must be satisfactory so it is ranked II, then most of the respondents are satisfied with the feel
about the future success with the company so it is ranked III, then the opinion of know and
understand the direction and goal most of the respondents are satisfied so it is ranked IV, most
of the respondents are satisfied with the work fulfills and basic needs so it is ranked V, most of
the respondents are satisfied with the appreciated at work place so it is ranked VI, most of the
respondents feel that the enjoy working everyday and performing are not much satisfactory so it
is ranked VII and most of the respondents feel that the changes the company leadership has made
is must be improved so it is ranked VIII.
AIM:
To test significant relationship between the age and promoted in your work.
H0: There is no significant relationship between the age and promoted in your work.
H1: There is a significant relationship between the age and promoted in your work.
Table 4.4.1
FORMULA
O - Observed frequency
E - Expected frequency
Table 4.4.2
Degree of freedom:
= (5-1) (4-1)
= 4x3
=12
X^2(0.05) = 5.6809
5.6809<11.33
Therefore H1 is accepted.
Inference:
From the result of the chi square analysis it is concluded that the Alternative hypothesis
(H1) is accepted.
4.5 KARL PEARSON’S CORRELATION OF COEFFICIENT
AIM
X- Compensation
Table 4.5.1
X Y X2 Y2 XY
FORMULA
r = 0.9
Inference
From the result see that the value of r is between 0 and 1. So there is a strong correlation
between compensation and safe for work place.
CHAPTER V
5.1 FINDINGS
Persentage of the respondents belong to the age group below 40 years.
Most of the respondents are male employees.
Most of the respondents were married.
Most of the respondents were educated.
Most of the respondents work experience 15-20 years.
Persentage of the respondents are neutral about the current salary.
Most of the respondents are agree with the co-workers wages.
Most of the respondents are strongly agree with the other people working in the same
field.
Most of the respondents are agree with the satisfied health benefits.
Most of the respondents are strongly agree with the company provide necessary benefits.
Most of the respondents are strongly agree with the understand company benefits options.
Most of the respondents are agree with the company’s benefits compared to other
company’s benefits.
Most of the respondents are agree with the flexible working hours, long lunch time, extra
vacation days, time off.
Most of the respondents are agree with the job security at working place.
Most of the respondents are disagree with the possibilities to be promoted in work.
Most of the respondents are agree with the training and re-training at work place.
Most of the respondents are neutral about the enjoy working everyday and performing at
best.
Most of the respondents are strongly agree with the work fulfills and basic needs.
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
REFERENCES
Bittel Lester R., Newstrom John W. 1992. What every supervisor should know: the
complete guide to supervisory management. USA. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Carol W. Ellis 2005. Management skills for new managers. USA. AMACOM.
QUESTIONNAIRE
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name:
2. Age:
3. Gender
a) Male ( ) b) Female ( )
5. Designation:
6. Educational Qualification:
a) SSLC ( ) b) HSC ( ) c) Diploma ( ) d) Degree ( )
SA –Strongly agree
A –Agree
N –Neutral
D –Disagree
SD –Strongly disagree
JOB SATISFACTION
SL.NO WAGES SA A N D SD
SL.NO BENEFITS SA A N D SD
SL.NO EXPECTATION SA A N D SD
MOTIVATION
SL.NO PARTICULAR SA A N D SD