Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Administration
Manila
Submitted by:
Gannaban, Rachelle
September 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
D. Conceptual Framework…...…………………………...…………………...…
F. Definition of Terms…………….…………………………………………..…
A. Materials…………………...……….…………………………………………
B. Methods…………………………………………………………………….…
C. Schematic Diagram……………………………...……………………………
D. Statistical Tools………………………………...……………………………..
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
colonization of the Spanish and Americans through the existing accounts primarily
written by the people who were present during the time, like Fray Juan de Plasencia,
an spanish missionary and a member of the Franciscan Order who wrote, Customs of
the Tagalogs, which contains the hierarchy of the Filipinos from what they call Datu
which means Chief up to the slave of some sorts who are expected to obey what the
person had been told to do so and to abide with the laws created to maintain a
harmonious and peaceful community. But, it was during the coalition of the Filipinos
and Americans, by which the Filipinos through their chosen representative, Emilio
Aguinaldo, beseech for help from the Americans in order to vanquish and conquer
their own land that was colonized by the Spanish. The Filipinos was able to attain
their independence apart from the Spaniards but it was not long enough before the
new conqueror arrived, the Americans. However, unlike the Spaniards who forbid
otherwise. The Americans did taught Filipinos to write, to speak in English language
and even the system they were using in the field of government, the democratic
In other words, it was the Americans who formally introduced to the Filipinos the idea
of leadership.
With regards to leadership, Martin Luther King gave a definition of a genuine
leader. According to him, "A genuine leader is not a searcher for consensus but a
leader is not measured by the number of his followers but, is measured by how he was
able to unite his followers as one. Thus, would result for the follower's conformity of
Based upon the research made by Kurt Lewin, a psychologist, together with
other researchers in 1939, there are 3 different kinds of styles namely: Authoritarian
The Authoritarian Leadership Style focused on both command of the leader and
control of the followers. Authoritarian leaders provide clear expectations for what
needs to be done, when it should be done and how it should be done. There is a clear
division between the leader and the followers. Authoritarian leaders make decisions
independently with little or no input from the rest of the group. The Democratic
Leadership Style, is the most effective leadership style. Democratic leaders offer
guidance to group members and at the same time, also participate in the group and
allow input from other group members. And lastly, the Laissez-faire Leadership Style,
known as the least productive of all three leadership styles. The leaders under this
type of leadership style offer little or no guidance and leave the decision-making to
For the purpose of this research, the kinds of leadership styles aforementioned
above will be correlated in connection with the variables, age, gender and socio-
economic status.
following questions:
The findings of the study may prove that the efficacy as a leader may vary
according to age, gender, and socio-economic status. This study will determine the
significant effects of the said factors in leadership styles of the college student leaders
of University of the East. The results of the study will be of great benefit to the
following:
will create a harmonious relationship between the two and unity will be their
those who wants to be a leader which leadership style would be applicable for
study.
D. Conceptual Framework
the researchers will be doing about the leadership styles in relation to age,
Tallying
Analyze data
Interpretation
Figure 1. Paradigm of the Conceptual Framework
This research paper aims to cover the answers regarding the leadership styles
in relation to age, gender and socio-economic status of the college leaders of the
University of the East - Manila. In this study, it is limited only in all college
department of tertiary level in the said university, namely, College of Arts and
is also limited to student council officers and class officers of each college
department. Furthermore, the leadership styles that will be used in the study will be
F. Definition of Terms
The following are the definitions of terms as they are used in the study:
and procedures, decides what goals are to be achieved, and directs and
or followers.
2. Democratic Leadership Style- also known as participative leadership or shared
deciding who is in the group and who gets to contribute to the decisions that
are made.
3. Laissez-Faire Leadership Style- also known as delegative leadership, is a type
of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and allow group members to
make the decisions. Leader This refers to the person who leads or commands a
k leadership style through the three leadership style namely: The Autocratic,
Autocratic leadership style and this leader always wants to command, order his
Fellowes to comply. This leader order but will not listen to his/her followers (Bass,
1990). In the other hand in Democratic leadership style the leader gives equal priority
organization (Adeyemi, 2007). In Laissez-faire leadership style the leader leaves the
subordinate free to make decision and exercise power, the leaders have least role and
participation in the discussion made by his/her group members in the organization
(Ogensanwo, 2000).
their own merits and limitations tools and none of these could be universally applied.
Depending in the situation on the followers - leaders has to choose his leadership style
in order to be effective (Bass, 1990). The objective of this study is to know if the age
and gender has factors greatly affects the leadership style of a person. The study is
focused on the workers in the sugar factory at Chitoor. In order to collect the data,
random sampling technique was used I the survey. In the sampling technique they
collect the information from the participants. With the used of 3 leadership styles the
researchers were able to analyze that the Democratic leadership style is more
dominant among the participants, Laissez-faire comes next and Autocratic leadership
style is exhibited by least number of employees. As we can see in this study 1-25 yrs.
Old 2 out of 2 are on democratic leadership style, from age 26-35 yrs. out of 21
and lastly 2 persons is on Laissez-faire leadership style. At the age of 36-45 yrs. Out
leadership style and at the age of 46 and above most of the participants of the
participants 4vwiyb the Autocratic and 18 is on Laissez-faire. And also, as we can see
out of the total 112 participants 70 of the applying Democratic Leadership style. And
with the conclusion the study indicates that out of the three leadership styles the
Democratic leadership style Is dominant with the workers of sugar factory in Chitoor
and with increasing age the workers exhibit lesser authority on their fellow workers.
The idea of leadership embarked on a new wider aspect of studies and researches
constituting various factors which can be correlated to leadership such as age, gender,
position, culture and the like, in which, this may contribute, may brought new ideas
and of significance, especially in the field of politics. Based on the study made by
Susan P. Kellett -Forsyth entitled, A study of the relationship between leadership style
and gender, Leadership is one of the numerous factors that shape world's existence.
reach necessary goals. Using the definition of Bernard Bass of Leadership, that it is
the interaction between the members of the group and that it occurs when one member
modifies the motivation and the competencies of others in the group, Susan P. Kellett
Leadership was based on the field manual of the military armies of the United States.
providing purpose, direction and motivation in which, in this definition given, there
are four factors involved namely: the leader, the led, the environment and the
leadership style of the participants consisting of thirty men and thirty-four women in
relation to gender. The sample group all in all is composed of 64 participants. Before
the methodologies was conducted, an assumption was made that the results would
Central Tendency Theorem in order to support any findings as valid. The respondents
are not randomly selected but, are those who volunteered out of their free will as
Statement and the Leader Behavior Analysis Survey, was designed to test the validity
and to determine whether women officers in the United States Army use a more
expected that the tools to provide the data to relate leadership style to gender used
would reveal the differences in leadership style that were attributable to gender
orientation and the result were expressed in terms of the study's participants'
frequency of use of the four frames (Bolman and Deal): the structural frame, the
human resources frame, the political frame and the symbolic frame. The structural
Frame is operated under the assumption that the organizations exists primarily to
accomplish established goals with coordination and control through the exercise of
authority and impersonal rules. The human resources frame focused on the people of
the organization. Stated here that people are the most critical resource in the
organization. For the political frame, this saw organizations as coalitions that included
a diverse set of individuals and interest groups. And lastly, the symbolic frame in
which organizations were judged not by what they did but by what they appeared.
As for the Leader Behavior Analysis Survey, it was used to identify the
subject’s predominant leadership style. There are four leadership styles. The S1 style
is highly directive with low supportive behavior that was mostly aligned with the
autocratic leadership style. The S2 style was both highly directive and highly
supportive. The S3 style was more analogous to a participative leadership style. And
lastly, the S4 style exhibited low directive and low supportive behavior. With the use
of these two research method, the researcher was able to make an analysis that there
was no significant differences between men and women in terms of the leadership
styles and frame analysis. Since, under structural frame, the average frequency of
frame response is 2.83 whereas, the average frequency of women is 2.73. Under
Human resources frame, the average frequency of frame response of men is 6.13 and
the average frequency of frame response of women is 5.17. Under Political frame, the
frame response of women is .35. And lastly, under Symbolic frame, the average
frequency of frame response of men is 1.6 and the average frequency of frame
response of women is 1.3. While, in terms of leadership style by gender, 60% of the
participants were rated higher in the S3 leadership style and 34% were rated higher in
the S2 leadership style. The combination of those rated higher in S1 and S4 leadership
styles is 6% of the study's population. In conclusion, men and women were very
similar in their choice of leadership styles and that, men and women made more
statements that corresponds with the human resource frame compared to other frames.
One of the recommendations is that, one may adopt the leadership styles of one's
superior and peers. More so, one may apply the research method used as well as the
may mean different things to different people. Akhtar (2012) explained that leadership
on the situation in which it is employed and conditional to how the leader and his
followers react and interact with each other. He further explained that, in
staff towards the achievement of organizational goals. According to Iqbal, Anwar, &
Haider (2015), leadership is a process by which a manager can direct, guide, and
influence the behavior and work of others toward the achievement of specific goals in
a given situation. Furthermore, the authors stressed that leadership entails the ability
of a manager to inspire the subordinates to work with confidence and zeal, it involves
persuasion and explanation as well as ability to identify, affirm, and renew the values
projecting an idealized vision. The transactional leader focuses on clarifying roles and
vision and mission, and is trustworthy and loyal. A charismatic leader also has
extraordinary talent, high self-esteem, persuasive skills, care, devotion, and extreme
influence on followers.
According to them, transformational leaders are not afraid to face challenges, they
They are innovative, possess negotiation skills, persistent, supportive, and thus,
and has an impact on the emotional temperament of the group, because of his or her
Wall, Pettibone, & Kelsey (2005) analyzed the impact of socioeconomic status on
community leadership activities than those with lower incomes. Moreover, individuals
activities than those with lower educational levels also. Female respondents were
transformational, and environmental. The autocratic leader makes the decision alone,
has total authority, and imposes his or her will. The bureaucratic leader believes in the
is successful or not. The charismatic leader leads by injecting energy and eagerness
into the team members. The democratic leader listens to the team’s ideas and analyzes
them, but has the responsibility to make the final decision. The servant leader
facilitates goal achievement by giving his or her team members what they need in
order to be productive. The laissez-faire leader is a leader that does not lead at all, he
or she fails in supervising team members, resulting in the lack of control and bad
service. The people-oriented leader is the one that promotes effectiveness and
efficiency, by supporting, training and developing the personnel; thus, increasing job
satisfaction and interest in doing the job well. The task-oriented leader focuses on the
job, and concentrates on the specific tasks assigned to each team member to fulfill a
goal. The transactional leader assigns tasks, and rewards or punishes subordinates for
effective and efficient. The environmental leader encourages team members to affect
their emotional and psychological temperament to feel they are part of the team.
A. Materials
The researchers will use a prepared questionnaire from Northouse, P.G. which
employed a 5-point scale to identify the leadership style of the respondents. the
respondents to agree to.
leadership styles. While in determining their socio-economic status, we will make use
of the social class in determining their social and economic standing in the society
according to.:
B. Methods
The selection of the college student leaders for the research sample will come
from various college departments. The selection of samples from the population of
college students will be done out of clustering. A total of six (6) college departments
were formed from clustering. From each cluster, there will be 50 college student
leaders that will be randomly selected basing on their convenience and discretion.
C. Schematic Diagram
Analysis of Data
D. Statistical Tools
After getting the scores from the answers of the respondents, we will get the
mean of the total scores from each respondent to determine the central tendency in
relation to their age, gender, and socio-economic status. The formulas\ for mean is:
After getting the mean of the score, we will determine the standard deviation
of the scores of all the respondents. The formula of the standard deviation is:
Now we have the standard deviation, we will be able to determine the z-scores
of the particular values in the curve. The formula for obtaining the z-score is: