Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Elemental analyses (C, H, N) were performed at CDRI, Lucknow. (s, 6H, phenyl–CH3 ); 7.21–7.98 (m, 12H, phenyl multiplet); 8.99
Manganese was determined by EDTA [28] after decomposing the (s, 2H, –HC N); 10.51 (s, 2H, –OHenol ); MS (EI): (Calcd. for m/z
complex with a mixture of 10 mL HNO3 , 5 mL conc. H2 SO4 and [M]+ = 504.23) [M+1]+ = 505; IR (cm−1 ), max (KBr): 3100–3600 br.
3 mL of HClO4 . Solid-state infrared spectra were recorded with a (O–H), 3051m (C–Hphenyl ), 2944–2873m (C–H), 1640 (C N), 1594vs
Perkin-Elmer IR spectrophotometer using KBr pellets at SICART, (C Ncyclic ) cm−1 .
Vallabha Vidhyanagar, Anand. 1 H NMR spectra were recorded with
JEOL-GSX-400 using CDCl3 as a solvent and TMS as an internal 2.1.1.4. H2 L4 . Yellow crystals, yield 86%; m.p. 252 ◦ C; Calcd.: C,
reference at SAIF, IIT Madras, Chennai. Mass spectra (EI) were 52.82; H, 3.80; N, 13.20. Found: C, 52.51; H, 3.18; N, 13.52. 1 H NMR
70 eV obtained on a JEOL D-300 mass spectrometer at SAIF, IIT (CDCl3 , TMS, ıppm): 2.36 (s, 6H, pyrazolone–CH3 ); 7.23–8.02 (m,
Madras, Chennai. The FAB mass spectra were recorded on a JEOL 12H, phenyl multiplet); 8.99 (s, 2H, –HC N); 10.51 (s, 2H, –OHenol );
SX 102 mass spectrometer using Argon/Xenon (6 kV, 10 mA) as MS (EI): (Calcd. for m/z [M]+ = 636.66) [M+2]+ = 639; IR (cm−1 ),
the FAB gas. The accelerating voltage was 10 kV and the spectra max (KBr): 3100–3600 br. (O–H), 3051m (C–Hphenyl ), 2944–2873m
were recorded at room temperature with using m-nitrobenzyl alco- (C–H), 1640 (C N), 1594vs (C Ncyclic ) cm−1 .
hol (NBA) as matrix. Electronic spectra in the 200–800 nm range
were obtained in DMF + methanol on “SHIMADZU” UV 160A using 2.2. Synthesis of Schiff base complexes of manganese (III)
quartz cell of 1 cm3 . Magnetic measurements were carried out at
room temperature by the Gouy method using Hg[Co(SCN)4 ] as cal- All the manganese (III) complexes of the Schiff base were
ibrant at Department of Chemistry, Vallabha Vidhyanagar, Anand. prepared by the following general method. Mn(OAc)3 ·2H2 O
Molar conductance of the Schiff base complexes was measured (2.68 g, 0.01 mol) solution in methanol (15 mL) was added to
on Systronics direct reading conductivity meter type CM - 82T. a warm (∼65 ◦ C), stirred solution of the corresponding Schiff
TGA/DTA was carried out on universal V3.0G TA instrument in H2 L1 (4.56 g, 0.01 mol) or H2 L2 (5.88 g, 0.01 mol) or H2 L3 (5.04 g,
the range 0–700 ◦ C at a heating rate of 10 ◦ C/min under nitro- 0.01 mol) or H2 L4 (6.36 g, 0.01 mol) in 25 mL 1:1 mixed solvent
gen at Department of Chemistry, Vallabha Vidhyanagar, Anand. (DMF + methanol). After the complete addition, 2 g of sodium per-
DSC was carried out on universal V3.0G TA instrument in the clorate was added and the reaction mixture refluxed for 6–7 h and
range 0–300 ◦ C at Department of Chemistry, Vallabha Vidhyana- then concentrated to half of its volume. The resulting precipitate
gar, Anand. X-ray diffraction diagrams were obtained on a Philips was filtered by suction and dried in vacuum over anhydrous CaCl2
PW 1710diffractometer (Cu/Ka; scan rate 1◦ min−1 ) with a graphite (Fig. 1).
monochromator at SICART, Vallabha Vidhyanagar, Anand.
3. Results and discussion
2.1. Synthesis of
5-oxo-3-methyl-1-p-tolyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde or The newly synthesized tetradentate ONNO donor Schiff base lig-
4-(4-formyl-5-oxo-3-methyl-pyrazol-1-yl)-benzenesulfonic acid ands H2 L1 , H2 L2 , H2 L3 and H2 L4 and complexes with manganese
[18] (III) complexes are stable at atmospheric temperature and pres-
sure. They are insoluble in organic solvents like methanol, ethanol,
2.1.1. Synthesis of Schiff base ligands (H2 L1 ), (H2 L2 ), (H2 L3 ) and and acetone while soluble in coordinating solvents such as DMF
(H2 L4 ) and DMSO and mixed solvents DMF + methanol and DMF + ethanol.
The Schiff bases were synthesized by refluxing methanolic solu- The analytical data are good agreements with the proposed struc-
tions of ethylenediamine (0.60 g, 0.01 mol) or o-phenylenediamine ture of Schiff base ligands as well as complexes. The analytical data
(1.08 g, 0.01 mol) with 5-oxo-3-methyl-1-p-tolyl-1H-pyrazole-4- are of Mn(III) complexes summarized in Table 1.
carbaldehyde (4.32 g, 0.02 mol) or 4-(4-formyl-5-oxo-3-methyl-
pyrazol-1-yl)-benzenesulfonic acid (5.64 g, 0.02 mol) in 20 mL 3.1. 1H NMR spectra
methanolic solution. A solid mass separated was collected and
washed by ether. Crystallization was done with ethanol and then The 1 H NMR spectra of Schiff base ligand (H2 L1 ), (H2 L2 ), (H2 L3 )
dried over CaCl2 . and (H2 L4 ) were carried out in DMSO-d6 at room temperature and
the important assignment is summarized as above. Ligands (H2 L1 )
2.1.1.1. H2 L1 . Yellow crystals, yield 88%; m.p. 209 ◦ C; Calcd.: C, and (H2 L3 ) show two singlet with the integration of six protons near
68.40; H, 6.18; N, 18.41. Found: C, 68.9; H, 6.18; N, 18.2. 1 H the ı ∼2.35 and ∼2.79 ppm for methyl group attached to pyrazolone
NMR (CDCl3 , TMS, ıppm): 1.4 (t, 4H, –CH2 –CH2 ); 2.35 (s, 6H, ring and phenyl ring, respectively [29]. Ligands (H2 L1 ) and (H2 L2 )
pyrazolone–CH3 ); 2.79 (s, 6H, phenyl–CH3 ); 7.32–7.98 (m, 12H, show triplet at ∼1.5 ppm for methylene proton of ethylenediamine.
phenyl multiplet); 8.90 (s, 2H, –HC N); 10.52 (s, 2H, –OHenol ); The enolic nature of all Schiff base ligand shows broad singlet at ı
MS (EI): (Calcd. for m/z [M]+ = 456.23) [M+1]+ = 458; IR (cm−1 ), ∼10.52 ppm, due to rapid exchange interaction of keto–enol tau-
max (KBr): 3100–3600 br. (O–H), 3051m (C–Hphenyl ), 2944–2873m tomerism [30]. The sharp singlet at ı ∼8.91 ppm, observed due
(C–H), 1640 (C N), 1598vs (C Ncyclic ) cm−1 . to aldehydic proton in all Schiff base ligand. The phenyl multiplet
observed in the range of ı ∼7.31–7.98 ppm. From the NMR data it
2.1.1.2. H2 L2 . Yellow crystals, yield 82%; m.p. 214 ◦ C; Calcd.: C, is observed that the present ligand shows keto–enol tautomerism
48.97; H, 4.11; N, 14.28; S, 10.90. Found: C, 48.9; H, 4.18; N, 14.2; S, as shown below.
10.76. 1 H NMR (CDCl3 , TMS, ıppm): 1.02 (t, 4H, –CH2 –CH2 ); 2.32 (s,
6H, pyrazolone–CH3 ); 7.32–7.98 (m, 12H, phenyl multiplet); 8.90 3.2. Infrared spectra
(s, 2H, –HC N); 10.52 (s, 2H, –OHenol ); MS (EI): (Calcd. for m/z
[M]+ = 588.62) [M+2]+ = 590; IR (cm−1 ), max (KBr): 3100–3600 br. The infrared spectra of the ligand show a broad band in a region
(O–H), 3051m (C–Hphenyl ), 2944–2873m (C–H), 1646 (C N), 1592vs 3100–3600 cm−1 , which may be due to (OH). Free (OH) is gen-
(C Ncyclic ) cm−1 . erally observed between 3500 and 3600 cm−1 . The low value of this
band is due to intermolecular H-bonding [29,30], which suggests
2.1.1.3. H2 L3 . Yellow crystals, yield 81%; m.p. 232 ◦ C; Calcd.: C, the presence of keto–enol tautomeric form (Fig. 2), at least in the
71.41; H, 5.59; N, 16.66. Found: C, 71.51; H, 5.18; N, 16.52. 1 H solid state. The same is also confirmed from its NMR signal at about
NMR (CDCl3 , TMS, ıppm): 2.35 (s, 6H, pyrazolone–CH3 ); 2.76 ı ∼10.52 ppm due to an enolic proton. The phenyl group shows
K.R. Surati, B.T. Thaker / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 75 (2010) 235–242 237
eff (B.M.)
4.86
4.84
4.82
4.90
(−1 cm2 mol−1 )
42
46
29
44
Mass peak m/z
570
701
617
749
11.42 (11.55)
13.84 (13.95)
10.61 (10.67)
13.02 (13.07)
M
8.19 (8.34)
8.83 (8.90)
–
–
S
14.22 (14.32)
11.21 (11.68)
13.18 (13.23)
10.76 (10.95)
N
Analysis found % (calculated %)
5.19 (5.28)
4.82 (4.88)
3.42 (3.52)
4.20 (4.04)
H
56.98 (57.28)
46.85 (46.95)
43.09 (43.41)
60.46 (60.51)
C
586.52
634.56
766.64
718.60
FW
m.p. (◦ C)
<250a
<250a
<250a
<250a
Yield (%)
69
63
68
65
Dark brown
Dark brown
Dark brown
Dark brown
Analytical data and physical properties of complexes.
Color
(CH) at 3060 cm−1 and (C C) at 1540 cm−1 . The bands at ∼1620,
∼1594, and ∼1300 cm−1 may be assigned to (C N) (azomethine),
(C N) (pyrazoline ring) [18], and (C–O) [20], respectively [31].
Decomposition point.
be lower than that of the ligand [32,33]. This may be due to the
a
deprotonation of the 5-OH group of the ligand [33]. All of the metal
238 K.R. Surati, B.T. Thaker / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 75 (2010) 235–242
Table 2
FT-IR and electronic spectral data of complexes and their assignments.
Complexes H2 O ı(H2 O) C N coord. C N (cyclic) C–O Str. d–d nm (ε) (Lit. cm−1 mol−1 ) Charge transfer band (nm)
568 (6000)
[Mn(L1 )(OAc)(H2 O)] 3479 714 1600 1592 1349 647 (5825) 232, 347
696 (5800)
566 (6070)
[Mn(L2 ) (OAc)(H2 O)] 3479 – 1612 1594 1346 648 (5860) 235, 348
690 (5820)
568 (6054)
[Mn(L3 )(OAc)(H2 O)] 3479 710 1630 1592 1354 647 (5840) 234, 347
695 (5799)
567 (6020)
[Mn(L4 )(OAc)(H2 O)] 3479 711 1625 1594 1346 645 (5862) 232, 348
695 (5810)
Table 3
The thermodynamic and decomposition parameters for complexes.
Complex Step Cp (kJ g−1 C−1 ) Ts T1 T2 Tp H* (kJ mol−1 ) S* (J K−1 mol−1 ) E* (kJ mol−1 )
Manganese (III) complexes show simple triclinic crystal sys- 3.9. Magnetic measurements
tem with six coordinates of the cell parameters: a = 14.026 Å,
b = 13.823 Å, c = 14.149 Å, ˛ = 97.7 8◦ , ˇ = 102.4 8◦ , = 88.3 8◦ . Rel- Manganese (III) complexes have magnetic moment values
ative intensity, d-spacing, angle (2
) and miller indices were which range from 4.9 to 4.84 B.M., indicating the presence of four
calculated. unpaired electrons per Mn(III) ion. These magnetic moments are
In view of the orientation effects and samples preparation error, in good agreement with Mn(III) in an octahedral configuration
we check all the complexes with different orientations. Also the [18,35,37]. All these data are summarized in Table 1.
background was minimized by taking blank.
4. Conclusion
3.8. Molar conductance On the basis of above studies the general structure of the Mn(III)
complexes is proposed as shown in Fig. 7. The Schiff base ligands
The observed molar conductances of the manganese (III) com- are behaving as O, N, N, O donor tetradentate ligands. Also the
plexes in 10−3 molar DMF solution are in the range 29–46 −1 anion OAc is coordinated with metal ion. All these studies give good
cm2 mol−1 , which are consistent with the non-electrolytic nature evidence of proposed structure.
of all the complexes [42].
Acknowledgements
References
[24] F. Marchetti, C. Pattinari, R. Pettinair, A. Cerquetella, A. Congolani, E.J. Chan, K. [33] K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Com-
Kozawa, B.W. Skelton, A.H. White, R. Wanke, M.L. Kuznetsov, L.M.D.R.S. Martins, pounds, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978, p. 242.
A.L. Pombeiro, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 8245–8257. [34] F.P. Dwyer, D.P. Mellor, Chelating Agent and Metal Chelates, Academic Press,
[25] D.D. Perrin, W.L.F. Armarego, D.R. Perrin, Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, New York, 1962.
2nd ed., Pergamon Press, 1981. [35] I.A. Patel, B.T. Thaker, Indian J. Chem. 42A (2003) 2487.
[26] A. Gordon, R. Ford, S. Khimika, A handbook of practical data, techniques and [36] A.B.P. Lever, Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1968.
references, John Wiley and Sons, Moscow, 1976. [37] I. Sakryan, N. Gunduz, T. Gunduz, Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 31 (7)
[27] O.T. Christensen, Z. Inorg. Chem. 27 (1901) 321. (2001) 1175.
[28] A.I. Vogel, A Textbook of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, ELBS & Longmans, [38] R.A.W. Johnstone, Mass Spectrometry for Organic Chemists, Cambridge Uni-
London, 1978, 434. versity Press, London, 1972.
[29] R.M. Silverstein, G.C. Bassler, T.C. Morrill, Spectrometric Identification of [39] F.W. McLafferty, Interpretation of Mass Spectra, 2nd ed., The Ben-
Organic Compounds, 5th ed., Wiley, New York, 1991. jamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Canada, 1973.
[30] R.N. Jadeja, J.R. Shah, E. Suresh, P. Paul, Polyhedron 23 (2004) 2465. [40] J.E. House, B.J. Smith, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 31 (1969) 703.
[31] Y.M. Patel, J.R. Shah, Indian J. Chem. 24A (9) (1985) 8000. [41] L.G. Azaroff, M.J. Buerger, The Powder Method in X-ray Crystallography,
[32] D.S. Raj, P.C. Shah, J.R. Shah, Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 22 (3) (1992) McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1958, p. 106.
321. [42] W.J. Geary, Coord. Chem. Rev. 7 (1971) 81.