Ribbed Slab 1

Structural Analysis and Design of a 2B+G+M+15 office Building
Ribbed slab for Ground and Mezanine floors

Floor layout
Figure 1: Mezzanine and Ground Floor layout

Ribbed Slab Section
EBCS-2,1995 on Art. 7.2.3.1(1,2) recommends the following on size of ribbed slab section.
 Ribs shall not be less than 70 mm in width; and shall have a depth, excluding any topping,
of not More than 4 times the minimum width of the rib. The rib spacing shall not exceed
1.0 m.
 Thickness of topping shall not be less than 40 mm, nor less than 1/10 the clear. Distance
between ribs
Proposed Ribbed Slab Section
Figure 2: Typical Section of the proposed slab system
Unity University Senior Essay

2018
Figure 3: Block dimensions

Verification of proposed slab section against EBCS-2 recommendation
i. Rib width provided- 80 mm and the minimum recommended is 70 mm …ok
ii. Rib depth (excluding topping) is 200 mm. minimum recommended ≤ 4 ∗
𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑟𝑖𝑏 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ = 4 ∗ 80 = 240 𝑚𝑚, ok.
iii. Rib spacing is 400 mm < 1000 mm ok
40 𝑚𝑚
iv. Topping thickness ≥ { 1 ∗ (400 − 40 − 40) = 32 𝑚𝑚 , minimum 40 mm, since 60
10
mm is provided ….ok
Since the proposed section satisfies all the requirements of EBCS-2 recommendation it is used as
it is.
Verification of proposed slab section against Deflection
The proposed slab section has a predefined overall depth of 300 mm. the depth required from
deflection should be computed to see if ribbed slab with 300 mm is applicable to the floor system
being considered.
a = 24 (for end span) [EBCS - 2,1995 Table 5.1]
fyk l
d  (0.4 + 0.6( )) * e [EBCS - 2,1995 eqn.5.3]
400 a
le  5.0 m from Figure 1
300 5 *1000 mm
d  (0.4 + 0.6( )) *  177.08mm
400 24
Overall depth(D):
Cover  15 mm [EBCS - 2,1995 Table 7.2]
And using 12 mm rebar

D  d  cover  /2  177.08mm  15mm  12mm / 2  190.08mm
Take D=200 mm
Since the provided depth, 300 mm, is greater than the minimum depth required from deflection,
the proposed section is safe against deflection.

2018
Loading
Unit weight of materials used:
cement mortar( plastering and cement screed)  23 KN/m3 EBCS  1,1995Table2.1
Reinforced concerte (Slab)  25 KN/m3 EBCS  1,1995 Table2.1
Porcelain tile Floor Finish  23 KN/m3 EBCS  1,1995 Table 2.1
Ribbed Dead Load
Material Thickness Width Unit Weight Dead load
TOPPING 0.06 0.4 25 0.6
RIB/JOIST 0.2 0.08 25 0.4
PLASTERING 0.02 0.4 23 0.18
FLOOR FINISH 0.02 0.4 23 0.18
MORTAR BED 0.03 0.4 23 0.28
PARTITION
0.4 1.5 0.6
WALL
BLOCKS 0.048 12 0.58
TOTAL DEAD LOAD 2.82
Ribbed Live Load
 Both concentrated and distributed live

loads are considered for the analysis
 Live Load from EBCS 1-1995
FOR office 3KN/M2

LL Qk/0.4m 1.2 KN/M
Ribbed Design Dead and Live load
1.3GK 3.7 KN/m
1.6qk 1.92 KN/m
1.6Qk 3.2 KN
Table 1: Dead and Live Load
Design Load
1.3Gk  1.6Q k EBCS -1,1995 Art. 1.9.4.5
𝑃𝑑 = 1.3𝐺𝑘 + 1.6𝑞𝑘 + 1.6𝑄𝑘 = 1.3 ∗ 2.82 + 1.6 ∗ 1.2 + 1.6 ∗ 2 = 5.6𝑘𝑛/𝑚 + 3.2𝐾𝑁

2018
Rib Analysis
The floor system, based on structural model, consists of two rib types; figure 1shows both. Here
after the ribs are analyzed to perform load transfer to girders and to determine the amount of
flexural and shear reinforcement required for the ribs.
Load transfer to girders is done separately for dead and live load using moment distribution
method. To obtain the design moment and shear the ribs are considered as continuous beams and
different load cases are assessed to obtain the maximum design shear and moment by varying the
location of live loads.
Rib 1
Structural model
Figure 4: Rib 1 structural model

The girder to rib connection is assumed to be pin at all locations. But to consider torsional effects
on the end girders, the ribs can be modeled with the end connections as fixed. But, in the
analysis to follow the first assumption is used.
Load Transfer to Girders
The load transfer is done by separate analysis of the dead and live load cases.
Dead Load Transfer
Figure 5: Dead load on rib

Cross Method of Moment Distribution for dead load transfer
Relative stiffness for each member
I 3 1
k54   ( )*( )  0.166
L 4 4.52
I 1
k 43  k32  k 21    0.2
L 5
Distribution factor(DF)
4

2018
Joint 5
DF54  1
Joint 4
K 45 0.166
DF45    0.454
K 45  K 43 0.166  0.2
K 43 0.2
DF43    0.546
K 45  K 43 0.166  0.2
Joint 3
K 34 0.2
DF34    0.5
K 32  K 34 0.2  0.2
K 32 0.2
DF32    0.5
K 32  K 34 0.2  0.2
Joint 2
K 23 0.2
DF23    0.5
K 23  K 21 0.2  0.2
K 21 0.2
DF21    0.5
K 23  K 21 0.2  0.2
Joint 1
DF12  1
DFcant.  0
Fixed end moment

F
M 54  0 KN  m
 ( Pd wl 2 )  (2.82 * 4.522 )
F
M 45    7.202 KN  m
8 8
( Pd wl 2 ) (2.82 * 52 )
F
M 43   M 34F  M 32F   M 23
F
 M 21
F
  M 12F    5.875 KN  m
12 12
2.82 *1.252
.   2.203 KN  m
F
M cant
2
the stiffness factor and the load on each span summarized in the table below.

2018
Distributed load Length Stiffness factor

W54 2.82 L54 4.52 K54 0.165929
W43 2.82 L43 5 K43 0.2
W32 2.82 L32 5 K32 0.2
W21 2.82 L21 5 K21 0.2
Wcanti. 2.82 Lcanti. 1.25 Kcanti. 0
Moment distribution table

Joint 5 4 3 2 1
Member 54 45 43 34 32 23 21 12 Canti.
DF 1.000 0.547 0.453 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.000 0.000
FEM 0.000 -7.202 5.875 -5.875 5.875 -5.875 5.875 -5.875 2.203
BAL 0.725 0.602 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.672
DIST 0.000 0.301 0.000 0.000 1.836
BAL 0.000 0.000 -0.150 -0.150 -0.918 -0.918
DIST -0.075 0.000 -0.459 -0.075
BAL 0.041 0.034 0.229 0.229 0.038 0.038
DIST 0.115 0.017 0.019 0.115
BAL -0.063 -0.052 -0.018 -0.018 -0.057 -0.057
DIST -0.009 -0.026 -0.029 -0.009
BAL 0.005 0.004 0.027 0.027 0.004 0.004
DIST 0.014 0.002 0.002 0.014
BAL -0.007 -0.006 -0.002 -0.002 -0.007 -0.007
SUM 0.000 -6.501 6.501 -5.495 5.495 -6.771 6.771 -2.203 2.203
End Shear
Member 54
Pd l 2 2.82 * 4.52 2
( M 54  M 45  ) (0  6.501  )
V45  2  2  7.811 KN
l 4.52
V54  Pd l  V45  2.82 * 4.52  7.811  4.935 KN
V 4.935
X o (location of span maximum moment)  54   1.75m
Pd 2.82
M MAX (span maximum)  M54  0.5 X oV54  0  0.5x1.75x4.935  4.318 KN - m
Member 43

2018
Pd l 2 2.82 * 52
( M 54  M 45  ) (6.49  5.53  )
V34  2  2  6.858 KN
l 5
V43  Pd l  V34  2.82 * 5  6.858  7.242 KN
V 7.242
Pd 2.82
M MAX (span maximum)  M 43  0.5 X oV43  6.49  0.5x2.568x7.242  2.809 KN - m
Member 32
Pd l 2 2.82 * 52
( M 32  M 23  ) (5.53  6.65  )
V23  2  2  7.274 KN
l 5
V32  Pd l  V23  2.82 * 5  7.274  6.826 KN
V 6.826
Pd 2.82
M MAX (span maximum)  M 43  0.5 X oV32  5.53  0.5x2.421x6.826  2.733 KN - m
Member 21
Pd l 2 2.82 * 52
( M 32  M 23  ) (6.65  2.2  )
V12  2  2  6.16 KN
l 5
V21  Pd l  V12  2.82 * 5  6.16  7.94 KN
V54 7.94
X o (location of span maximum moment)    2.816m
Pd 2.82
M MAX (span maximum)  M 43  0.5 X oV32  6.65  0.5x2.816 x7.94  4.529 KN - m
Reactions
Re action on Axis 5  V54  4.94 KN
Re action on Axis 4  V45  V43  7.81  7.24  15.05KN
Re action on Axis 3  V34  V32  6.85  6.79  13.64 KN
Re action on Axis 2  V45  V43  7.81  7.24  15.05KN
Re action on Axis 1  V54  6.16  3.53  9.69 KN

2018
Since the load calculation for ribbed slab is done by considering 0.4m wide strip, the reactions
determined above should be divided by 0.4 to change them into per meter loads for the girders.
4.94
𝐺𝑖𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑛 𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑠 1: − 0.4 = 12.35𝑘𝑛/𝑚
7.81 + 7.24
𝐺𝑖𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑛 𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑠 2: − = 37.625 𝑘𝑛/𝑚
0.4
6.86 + 6.83
𝐺𝑖𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑛 𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑠 3: − = 34.225𝑘𝑛/𝑚
0.4
7.27 + 7.94
0.4
6.16 + 3.56
0.4
o Live load Transfer
Following the procedure used for dead load the following reactions are obtained.
0.00 -2.77 2.77 -2.34 2.34 -2.88 2.88 -0.94 0.94
2.10 3.32 3.09 2.91 2.89 3.11 3.39 2.61 1.50
xo 1.75 xo 2.57 xo 2.41 xo 2.82

Mmax -1.83748 Mmax -1.20081 Mmax -1.14521 Mmax -1.90361
2.10
0.4
3.32 + 3.09
0.4
2.91 + 2.89
0.4
3.11 + 3.39
0.4
2.61 + 1.50
0.4

2018
Analysis of Rib 1 for design load

For rib1 the following 7 load cases are considered to obtain the maximum moment and shear for
each critical section.
Performing moment distribution method, the following bending and shear force diagram are
obtained.

2018
Case I
Shear Force Diagram

20.00 16.01 16.89
15.16
15.00 10.88 10.18
10.00
2.04 2.92
5.00 1.19
-1.75
0.00
-5.00 0.00 5.00 -1.16 10.00 15.00 -0.28 20.00 25.00
-2.01
-4.95
-10.00
-15.00
-15.12 -15.97 -14.24
-20.00 -17.57
Bending Moment Diagram

20.00 15.14 14.97
12.93
15.00
8.36
10.00
5.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0 5 10 15 20 25
-5.00
-10.00 -7.54 -7.87
-10.59 -9.80
-15.00
CASE II
Shear Force Diagram

20.00 15.28
11.93 9.16 9.86 10.18
10.00
1.32 0.00
-0.70
0.00
0.00 -3.90 5.00 10.00 -1.88 15.00 20.00 25.00
-10.00 -8.47
-9.17
-20.00 -16.52 -15.85
10

2018

20.00
10.38 10.41 11.82
8.36
10.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0 5 -1.07 10 15 -1.43 20 25
-10.00
-10.66
-12.74
-20.00
CASE III
Shear Force Diagram

20.00 16.27 17.38
8.71
10.00 5.36 3.42 4.58
2.31
-0.46 0.00
-2.92
0.00
-0.89 0.22
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
-10.00 -13.75
-11.21 -9.62
-14.86
-20.00

20.00 13.21 11.95
9.67
10.00 2.86
0.00 0.00
0.00
0 5 10 -0.68 15 20 25
-10.00 -3.92
-10.09
-20.00 -14.05
CASE IV
Shear Force Diagram

17.08 17.43
20.0010.60
8.49
10.00 3.12 3.46 4.58
-2.03 -0.68 0.00
0.00 -0.08 0.26
0.00 -5.23 5.00 10.00 15.00 -13.70
20.00 25.00
-10.00
-9.84
-20.00 -14.05
-17.85
11

2018

30.00
16.40
20.00 12.19
8.81
10.00 0.00 2.86
0.00
0.00
-1.02
-10.00 0 5 10 15 20 25
-10.05 -8.85
-20.00 -13.94
CASE V
Shear Force Diagram

14.90 16.44
20.00
9.60 10.18
10.00 5.72 2.48
0.94 0.00
0.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 -0.72 15.00 20.00 25.00
-2.26
-10.00
-10.85 -8.73
-20.00 -16.23 -14.69

20.00 14.92
15.00 11.60 10.54
8.36
10.00
5.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
-5.00 0 5 10 15 20 25
-2.03
-10.00 -4.46
-15.00 -8.65 -8.77
CASE VI
12

2018
Shear Force Diagram

30.00
18.45
20.00 13.89
11.83 9.54
10.00 4.48 4.58
-0.80 0.38 -0.07 0.00
0.00 1.28
0.00 -4.00 5.00 10.00 -3.27 15.00 20.00 25.00
-10.00
-8.79
-12.68
-20.00 -16.62 -17.24

30.00
17.29
20.00 10.83 8.93
10.00 2.86
0.00 0.00
0.00
0 -12.53 5 -1.60 10 15 20 25
-10.00 -8.35
-11.53
-20.00
CASE VII
Shear Force Diagram

20.00 16.10 14.73
9.35 10.18
10.00 5.41
2.13 0.18 0.76 0.00
-2.88
0.00
0.00 5.00
-11.16 -1.07 10.00 15.00 -2.44 20.00 25.00
-10.00 -15.03
-8.98
-20.00 -16.40

20.00 13.01
10.34 9.44 8.36
10.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0 5 10 -1.57 15 20 25
-10.00 -3.99
-9.88 -10.45
-20.00
13

2018
Moment envelope
Reaction Envelope
Design for flexure

Since the topping slab together with the ribs form a T beam system, it is designed as such where
the moment on the section causes compression at the flange and tension at the web (span/sagging
moment) and as a rectangular section for the reverse of the above case (support / hogging moment).
Design for sagging moment
The design of T beam is a trial and error matter since the location of the neutral axis determines
how the section should be designed. this parameter isn’t known without designing the section first.
Therefore, the following procedure is followed:
1. The location of the neutral axis is assumed to be within the flange and the section is design.
2. The assumption is checked. If it is okay, then the section is designed as rectangular beam with
b=bf.
3. If the assumption is not ok, the section is designed as T beam.
Sample support and span design
Span 54 Design
𝑀𝑠𝑑 = 12.737 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
Section of the rib at span is showed in the figure below
∅𝑙 12
𝑑 = 𝐷 − 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 − ∅𝑠 − = 260 − 15 − 8 − = 231 𝑚𝑚
2 2
14

2018
𝑀𝑠𝑑 12.737
𝐾𝑚 = √ 2 = √ = 24.43
𝑏𝑑 0.4 ∗ 0.2312
From design table 1a,EBCS-2, 1995 Part 2,the value of 𝑘𝑥 is obtained to determine whether the
assumption is ok.
𝑘𝑥 = 0.108
𝑥 = 𝑘𝑥 𝑑 = 0.108 ∗ 231 = 24.948 𝑚𝑚
0.8𝑥 = 0.8 ∗ 24.948 = 19.958 𝑚𝑚
0.8𝑥 < ℎ𝑓 ?,
19.958 < 60 … 𝑦𝑒𝑠
The assumption is ok; proceed with the design.
𝑘𝑠 = 3.98
𝐾𝑠 𝑀𝑠𝑑 12.737
𝐴𝑠 = = 3.98 ∗ = 219.451 𝑚𝑚2
𝑑 0.231
219.451 𝑚
𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 ∅12, # 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 = = 1.94 , 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒 2∅12
0.25 ∗ 𝜋 ∗ 122
Design for Support moment
for support moment rectangular section with width equal to rib width is considered. This section
is shown in the figure below.
Support 2
Msd = 17.92 kn − m
∅ 12
𝑑 = 𝐷 − 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 − ∅𝑠 − 2𝑙 = 260 − 15 − 8 − 2 = 231 𝑚m
d = 231 mm
17.92
Km = √ = 64.79 > 57.83
0.08 ∗ 0.2312
Design as Doubly Reinforced section
From design table 1a
𝑘𝑚 64.79
∗
= = 1.12
𝑘𝑚 57.83
12
𝑑2 15 + 8 + 2
= = 0.12
𝑑 231
𝜌 = 1.01
𝜌′ = 1.06
15

2018
k s = 4.59
𝑘𝑠′ = 0.85
Msd 17.92
As1 = k s ∗ ∗ 𝜌 = 4.59 ∗ ( ) ∗ 1.01 = 359.63 𝑚𝑚2
𝑑 0.231
Msd 17.92
As2 = k ′s ∗ ∗ 𝜌′ = 0.85 ∗ ( ) ∗ 1.06 = 69.89 𝑚𝑚2
𝑑 0.231
Using diameter 14 bars:
359.63
# of bars As1 = = 2.33 , 3∅14
0.25 ∗ π ∗ 142
Using diameter 10 bars:
69.89
# of bars As2 = = 0.889 , 1∅10
0.25 ∗ π ∗ 102
Summary of flexural design

Rib Moment kx x Check AS Ø # of bar
Span 54 12.737 0.068 15.631 Rectangular 217.238 12 2
support 4 16.401 0.541 124.946 Rectangular Double 12 Double
1
support 1 8.364 0.044 10.166 Rectangular 141.285 12 2
# of # of
Rib Moment Km/Km* d2/d Ks Ks' ρ ρ' As1 As2 As1 As2
Ø14 Ø10
support 4 16.401 1.072 0.12554 4.636 0.54 1.007 1.06 331 40.63972 3 1
2
support 3 14.920 1.022 0.12554 4.706 0.0267 1 1.06 304 1.827936 2 1
support 2 17.289 1.094 0.12554 4.606 0.76 1.01 1.06 348 60.29357 3 1
Table: summery of flexural design

Design for Shear
From the reaction envelope the maximum shear is 18.54 KN. Therefore, Vsd=18.54 KN. Since the
ribs are supported on girders, they aren’t considered to be supported on point support. Therefore,
the design shear force is the same as the shear at the center line of support(Girders).
Check whether 𝑉𝑟𝑑 is not exceeded by any 𝑉𝑠𝑑
𝑉𝑟𝑑 = 0.25𝑓𝑐𝑑 𝑏𝑑 [𝐸𝐵𝐶𝑆 − 1,1995 𝐸𝑞𝑛. 4.28]
𝑉𝑟𝑑 = 0.25 ∗ 11.33 ∗ 80 ∗ 231 ∗ 10−3 = 52.3446 𝑘𝑛
calculate 𝑣𝑐
16

2018
𝑣𝑐 = 0.25𝑘1 𝑘2 𝑓𝑐𝑡𝑑 𝑏𝑤 𝑑[𝐸𝐵𝐶𝑆 − 2,1995 𝐸𝑞𝑛. 4.29]

0.5
𝑘1 = 1 + 50𝜌 = 1 + 50 ∗ ( ) = 1.083
300
𝑘2 = 1.6 − 𝑑 = 1.6 − 0.231 = 1.369
2
0.21 ∗ (20)3
𝑓𝑐𝑡𝑑 = = 1.03
1.5
𝑣𝑐 = 0.25 ∗ 1.083 ∗ 1.369 ∗ 1.03 ∗ 80 ∗ 231 ∗ 10−3 = 7.055 𝑘𝑛
𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 18.54 𝑎𝑛𝑑 > 𝑣𝑐 provide shear reinforcement with
𝑎𝑣 𝑓𝑦𝑑 𝑑
𝑆= [𝐸𝐵𝐶𝑆 − 2,1995 𝐸𝑞𝑛. 4.31]
𝑣𝑠𝑑 − 𝑣𝑐
2 ∗ 0.25 ∗ 𝜋 ∗ 82 ∗ 260.87 ∗ 231
𝑆= ∗ 10−3 = 527.47 𝑚𝑚
18.54 − 7.055
Check the s against the maximum allowable spacing
2 2
𝑣𝑟𝑑 = ∗ 52.344 = 34.896 𝑘𝑛
3 3
2 0.5𝑑 = 0.5 ∗ 231 = 115.5 𝑚𝑚
Since 𝑣𝑠𝑑 < 3 𝑣𝑟𝑑 , 𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤ { [𝐸𝐵𝐶𝑆 − 2,1995 𝐸𝑞𝑛. 7.14]
300
Since 𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑥 < 𝑠, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 115.5 𝑚𝑚
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 ∅8 𝑐/𝑐110 𝑚𝑚
Topping reinforcement
The topping shall be provided with a reinforcement mesh providing in each direction a cross
sectional area not less than 0.001 of the section of the slab[𝐸𝐵𝐶𝑆 − 2,1995 𝐴𝑟𝑡. 7.2.3.2(3)].
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.001𝑏ℎ = 0.001 ∗ 1000 ∗ 60 𝑚𝑚 = 60 𝑚𝑚2
Using diameter 6 bars
28.27
𝑠= ∗ 1000 = 471.23 𝑚𝑚
60
Check for the maximum spacing
𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 200 𝑚𝑚
The maximum spacing governs
17

2018
Rib 2 Design
The following load cases are considered while analyzing rib 2.
Six cases shown in the above figure are analysed using moment distribution and the following
moment and reaction envelope are obtained.
18

2018
Moment envelop for rib 2
Reaction Envelop for rib 2
Flexural Design summery for rib 2
Rib Moment kx x Check AS Ø # of bar

2
# of # of
Rib Moment Km/Km* d2/d Ks Ks' ρ ρ' As1 As2 As1 As2
Ø14 Ø10
support 4 16.374 1.071 0.12554 4.636 0.54 1.007 1.06 331 40.57359 3 1
2 support 3 14.394 1.004 0.12554 4.706 0.027 1 1.06 293 1.763516 2 1
support 2 17.626 1.104 0.12554 4.606 0.76 1.01 1.06 355 61.46973 3 1
19

2018
Load on Girder
A B C D E F G H I J
6.35 5.35
1.25
5.0 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 6.4 6.2
5
GK 25.01 GK 14.95 GK 14.95 GK 14.95 GK 25.01
QK 10.64 QK 6.36 QK 6.36 QK 6.36 QK 10.64
5.25
4
GK 39.37 GK 40.49 GK 40.49 GK 40.49 GK 39.37
QK 16.75 QK 17.23 QK 17.23 QK 17.23 QK 16.75
5
RIB 1 RIB 2 RIB 2 RIB 2 RIB 2 RIB 2 RIB 2 RIB 2 RIB 1
3
GK 33.19 GK 33.65 GK 33.65 GK 33.65 GK 33.19
QK 14.13 QK 14.32 QK 14.32 QK 14.32 QK 14.13
5
2
GK 40.80 GK 40.49 GK 40.49 GK 40.49 GK 40.80
QK 17.36 QK 17.23 QK 17.23 QK 17.23 QK 17.36
5.25
1
GK 14.96 GK 14.95 GK 14.95 GK 14.95 GK 14.96
QK 6.37 QK 6.36 QK 6.36 QK 6.36 QK 6.37
20

2018

Ribbed Slab 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ribbed Slab 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Analysis and Design of a 2B+G+M+15 office Building

Ribbed slab for Ground and Mezanine floors

Figure 1: Mezzanine and Ground Floor layout

Figure 2: Typical Section of the proposed slab system

Unity University Senior Essay

Figure 3: Block dimensions

And using 12 mm rebar

Unity University Senior Essay

 Both concentrated and distributed live

FOR office 3KN/M2

Unity University Senior Essay

Figure 4: Rib 1 structural model

Figure 5: Dead load on rib

Unity University Senior Essay

Fixed end moment

Unity University Senior Essay

Distributed load Length Stiffness factor

Moment distribution table

M MAX (span maximum)  M54  0.5 X oV54  0  0.5x1.75x4.935  4.318 KN - m

Unity University Senior Essay

M MAX (span maximum)  M 43  0.5 X oV43  6.49  0.5x2.568x7.242  2.809 KN - m

M MAX (span maximum)  M 43  0.5 X oV32  5.53  0.5x2.421x6.826  2.733 KN - m

M MAX (span maximum)  M 43  0.5 X oV32  6.65  0.5x2.816 x7.94  4.529 KN - m

Unity University Senior Essay

2.10 3.32 3.09 2.91 2.89 3.11 3.39 2.61 1.50

xo 1.75 xo 2.57 xo 2.41 xo 2.82

Unity University Senior Essay

Analysis of Rib 1 for design load

Unity University Senior Essay

Shear Force Diagram

Bending Moment Diagram

Shear Force Diagram

Unity University Senior Essay

Bending Moment Diagram

Shear Force Diagram

Bending Moment Diagram

Shear Force Diagram

Unity University Senior Essay

Bending Moment Diagram

Shear Force Diagram

Bending Moment Diagram

Unity University Senior Essay

Shear Force Diagram

Bending Moment Diagram

Shear Force Diagram

Bending Moment Diagram

Unity University Senior Essay

Design for flexure

Unity University Senior Essay

Unity University Senior Essay

Summary of flexural design

Table: summery of flexural design

Unity University Senior Essay

𝑣𝑐 = 0.25𝑘1 𝑘2 𝑓𝑐𝑡𝑑 𝑏𝑤 𝑑[𝐸𝐵𝐶𝑆 − 2,1995 𝐸𝑞𝑛. 4.29]

Unity University Senior Essay

Unity University Senior Essay

Moment envelop for rib 2

Reaction Envelop for rib 2

Flexural Design summery for rib 2

Rib Moment kx x Check AS Ø # of bar

Unity University Senior Essay

Unity University Senior Essay