You are on page 1of 6

Rainfall Variability: A Tool for Crop

Planning of Udaipur Region of India

D. K. Jajoria, S. K. Sharma, G. P. Narolia


& M. L. Dotaniya

National Academy Science Letters

ISSN 0250-541X

Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett.


DOI 10.1007/s40009-014-0305-9

1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and all
rights are held exclusively by The National
Academy of Sciences, India. This e-offprint
is for personal use only and shall not be self-
archived in electronic repositories. If you wish
to self-archive your article, please use the
accepted manuscript version for posting on
your own website. You may further deposit
the accepted manuscript version in any
repository, provided it is only made publicly
available 12 months after official publication
or later and provided acknowledgement is
given to the original source of publication
and a link is inserted to the published article
on Springer's website. The link must be
accompanied by the following text: "The final
publication is available at link.springer.com”.

1 23
Author's personal copy
Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett.
DOI 10.1007/s40009-014-0305-9

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Rainfall Variability: A Tool for Crop Planning of Udaipur Region


of India
D. K. Jajoria • S. K. Sharma • G. P. Narolia •

M. L. Dotaniya

Received: 27 November 2013 / Revised: 15 April 2014 / Accepted: 16 April 2014


Ó The National Academy of Sciences, India 2014

Abstract Among the climatic elements, rainfall is the A detailed knowledge of the rainfall regime of a particular
first index, which determines the cropping pattern of an region is an important prerequisite for agricultural planning
area and the type of crop to be cultivated. Therefore, the and management. More on rain-fed agriculture, it is the
present study deals the rainfall characteristics of the single most important agro-meteorological variable influ-
Udaipur District of Rajasthan, India. The daily rainfall data encing crop production and its productivity [1]. Amount
for last 39 years (1973–2011) were analyzed to study its distribution and intensity of rainfall mainly determine the
variability and probability. The mean annual rainfall of the choice of any particular crop and agronomic practices [2].
area was 630.20 mm and it was highest (1,145 mm) in the India is a tropical country and its agricultural planning and
year 1973 followed by 978 mm in 1983. The contribution utilization of water depends on monsoon rainfall [3]. More
from winter, summer/pre-monsoon, monsoon and post- than 75 % of rainfall accruing during the monsoon season
monsoon periods was 1.08, 3.17, 89.89 and 5.86 %, with uneven both in time and space, so it is an important
respectively. Rains during June, July, August and Sep- factor to evolve the scientific rainfall analysis. Scientific
tember are more helpful to indicate the suitability crop studies on rainfall pattern and variability would enable the
growing period for profitable crop production. Each stan- farming community to adjust or modify the cropping pro-
dard meteorology week from 26th to 38th receive a rainfall gram as well as the cultural operations for the profitable
of above 20 mm, indicating the crop growing period from crop production. At Ludhiana (India) the rainfall analysis
June 4th week to September 3rd week. The study indicated for the past 95 years reported by Hundal and Kaur [4]
that the mean annual rainfall was found 630.20 mm and showed an increasing trend over normal for both annual as
monthly mean rainfall was observed to be 14.20, 74.29, well as summer season rainfall in last 30 years. Bhargava
178.52, 212.59, 100.98, 20.51 mm for May, June, July, et al. [5] was analysed rainfall variation at Roorkee region
August, September and October, respectively. of Uttarakhand and suggested appropriate crop for a par-
ticular region in a specific duration. They reported that July
Keywords Crop planning  Probability pattern  month is regarded suitable for transplanting of rice crop in
Rainfall variability Roorkee region. The rainfall based information generated
by this study is expected to be of considerable agronomic
importance for the efficient planning and management of
cropping systems. Hence the study was undertaken in
Udaipur, Rajasthan to understand the rainfall variability for
crop planning purpose.
D. K. Jajoria (&)  S. K. Sharma  G. P. Narolia
Directorate of Research, Maharana Pratap University of Udaipur, is located in the southern region of Rajasthan
Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur 313 001, India and is close to Gujarat. It lies in the northern plains of
e-mail: jajoriadinesh@gmail.com India, which witness extremes of temperature. It can drop
to a minimum of 17.2 °C in the winters while it goes up to
M. L. Dotaniya
Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Berasia Road, 31.8 °C in summers. The daily rainfall data for 39 years
Bhopal 462 038, India (1973–2011) from Agromet observatory located in

123
Author's personal copy
D. K. Jajoria et al.

100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
-20.00
-40.00
-60.00
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Fig. 1 Annual rainfall deviation from normal at Udaipur

Fig. 2 Annual rainy days 60


(C2.5 mm/day) at Udaipur y = -0.17x + 372.49
50 R² = 0.0565
40
Rainy Days

30

20

10

Years

Table 1 Monthly rainfall analysis (1973–2011) at Udaipur


Month Average SD CV (%) Mean/2 Mean 9 2 No. of No. of No. of Dry Normal Above normal
rainfall (mm) (mm) (mm) dry rainfall normal above normal month (%) rainfall rainfall month
(mm) month rainfall rainfall years month (%) (%)
years

January 003.37 7.99 231.22 1.7 6.7 32 2 5 82 5 13


February 003.42 7.73 238.25 1.7 6.8 27 7 5 69 18 13
March 000.83 2.06 249.19 0.4 1.7 29 3 7 74 8 18
April 004.97 16.05 322.72 2.5 9.9 29 6 4 74 15 10
May 014.20 21.68 152.68 7.1 28.4 23 7 9 59 18 23
June 074.29 55.50 74.71 37.1 148.6 10 25 4 26 64 10
July 178.52 72.71 40.73 89.3 357.0 1 37 1 3 95 3
August 212.59 118.91 55.93 106.3 425.2 6 31 2 15 79 5
September 100.98 129.53 128.26 50.5 202.0 14 19 6 36 49 15
October 020.51 33.22 161.97 10.3 41.0 24 8 7 62 21 18
November 013.91 35.76 257.11 7.0 27.8 31 2 6 79 5 15
December 002.51 9.31 371.15 1.3 5.0 33 4 2 85 10 5

Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, India located at magnitude and probability analysis were carried out by
27.70°N latitude and 75.55°E longitude and 582 mean sea using Weibell’s formula [7].
level were collected and used for analysis of probability P ¼ m = ð n þ 1Þ
and variability. Data was analyzed for average, coefficient
of variation and standard deviation as per methods Where P is plotting positions per cent, m is the rank of
described in Snedecor and Cochran [6]. The number of magnitude and n is the total no. of years for which analysis
drought, normal and excessive rainfall or flood months and was carried out. Rainfall probability analysis was based on
weeks in a year were listed in descending order of first order Markov Chain as done by Singh [8].

123
Author's personal copy
Rainfall Variability

The daily rainfall data for the period from 1973–2011 On the basis of above results the maize cultivar Pratap
was analyzed and the results are presented in Fig. 1. The Makka-5 and sorghum CSV-15 were sown at the end of
data revealed that the highest rainfall 1145.3 mm was June to first week of July. Rainfall received during this
received in year 1973 whereas lowest rainfall was received period was sufficient for land preparation and sowing of
in 1995 which was only 329.1 mm. The mean annual maize and sorghum crop.
rainfall was 630.20 mm with coefficient of variation of While the sowing of maize cultivars PEHM-2, Pratap
30.35 % and standard deviation is 191.25 mm. The number Makka-3 of 85–90 days and CSV-17 of sorghum was
of annual rainy days during 1973–2011 is showed in Fig. 2. done on 28th and 29th meteorological week (second to
The trend analysis of rainy days in Udaipur shows negative third week of July). Gap filling of maize completed at
trend. The highest 57 rainy days were observed in the year the fourth week of July and sowing of pulses like black
1973 in comparison of mean annual rainy days which is gram and green gram completed by 30th meteorological
only 34 days. The annual rainfall amount of 383.1 mm week.
would be expected with 90 % probability while 499.4, Sowing of horesegram completed up to the last week of
601.0, 696.2 and 769.4 mm would be expected with 75, 50, July. So it can utilize proper moisture for germination.
30 and 25 % probability, respectively. The frequency of Mustard or taramira (Eruca sativa) was taken immedi-
normal, excess and deficient months and percentage of ately after the harvest of groundnut or maize during the
normal, excess and deficient months are presented in second fortnight of October.
Table 1. August is the wettest month, which receives
The onset of south west monsoon is started in the 26th
212.59 mm of rainfall with the variability of 55.9 per cent.
meteorological week and the wettest week was 34th
The wettest month next to August is July with average
meteorological week in Udaipur, India. The July month is
rainfall 178.59 mm and it has the lowest coefficient of
regarded suitable for sowing of all summer crops like
variation i.e. 40.73 %. March is the driest month with
maize and sorghum crops in the Udaipur region. Each
major amounts of average rainfall (0.83 mm). The study
standard week from 26th to 38th receives rainfall of more
revealed that during the period of 39 years in the southwest
than 20 mm indicating favourable crop growing period
monsoon in Udaipur region starts from the last month of
from June last week to mid of September. The 50 %
June and continues up to September. During the study
probability of rainfall occurs up to last week of September
period of 39 years deficient, normal and excessive rainfall
and according to normal rainfall the moisture was available
months were 259 (55.34 %), 151 (32.26 %) and 58
option first week of October which was very important to
(12.39 %), respectively. This type of long term study on
crop planning of groundnut and maize in winter season.
rainfall pattern of a particular area in relation to crop
productivity, enhanced the potential of a region for crop
planning [9]. The sowing of the summer crops is therefore
undertaken during this period. Mean rainfall of different
weeks, its extremes and coefficient of variation have been References
also worked out. It was observed that the quantum of
rainfall received during 25th–39th week would normally be 1. Ben Nouna B, Katerji N, Mastrorilli M, 115 (2003) Using the
sufficient to sustain any summer crop within that period. CERES-maize model in asemi-arid Mediterranean environment.
Initial and conditional probability of receiving [20 mm New modelling of leaf area and water stress functions. Eur J
Agron 19(2):115–123
rainfall per week was estimated using a Markov Chain 2. Sato T, Qadir M, Yamamoto M, Endo T, Zahoor A (2013)
probability model. It enhanced the crop productivity and Global, regional, and country level need for data on wastewater
fertility of soil, in maize yield was increased two fold generation, treatment, and use. Agric Water Manage 130:1–13
compared to other crops [10]. Many crop growth models 3. Shrivastava P, Swarup A (2001) Management of wastewater for
environmental protection of freshwater resources: an approach
used this meteorological data for crop planning and pre- for tropical countries both developing and undeveloped, Inter-
diction of carbon sequestration [11] and enhanced the national Conference on Freshwater, 3–7 December, Bonn
nutrient uptake [12]. 4. Hundal SS, Kaur P (2002) Annual and Seasonal climatic vari-
The probability rainfall pattern could be utilized for ability at different locations of Punjab state. J Agromet
4(2):113–125
growing rainy season crops like maize cowpea, groundnut, 5. Bhargava AK, Singh PK, Vasu Mitra Prashad A, Jayapalan
black gram etc. in the second fortnight of June with the (2010) Rainfall variability and probability pattern for crop plan-
commencement of southwest monsoon in this region [13]. ning of Roorkee region (Uttarakhand) of India. Mausam
To utilize monsoon rain most effectively, maize can be 61(4):509–516
6. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical Methods. Oxford
substituted with other low water requiring high value crops & IBH, New Delhi
through sole or intercropping, provided, proper weed 7. Chow VT (1964) Hand book of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill
management is followed [14]. Book Co, New Delhi

123
Author's personal copy
D. K. Jajoria et al.

8. Singh PK (2005) Rainfall variability and crop planning in Sabour ions by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci, India
region of Bihar. J Agromet 7(2):284–290 Sect, B Biol Sci 83:305–309. doi:10.1007/s40011-012-0153-718
9. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. FAO 13. Rana G, Katerji N, Lazzara P, Ferrara RM (2012) Operational
Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 33. FAO, Rome determination of daily actual evapotranspiration of irrigated
10. Zwart SJ, Bastiaanssen WGM (2004) Review of measured crop tomato crops under Mediterranean conditions by one-step and
water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton, and two-step models: multiannual and local evaluations. Agric Water
maize. Agric Water Manag 69:115–133 Manag 115:285–296
11. Stricevic R, Cosic M, Djurovic N, Pejic B, Maksimovic L (2011) 14. Amrawat T, Solanki NS, Sharma SK, Jajoria DK, Dotaniya ML
Assessmentof the FAO AquaCrop model in the simulation of (2013) Phenology growth and yield of wheat in relation to ag-
rainfed and supplemental irrigated maize, sugar beet and sun- rometeorological indices under different sowing dates. Afr J
flower. Agric Water Manag 98(10):1615–1621 Agric Res 8(49):6366–6374
12. Dotaniya ML, Datta SC, Biswas, Meena BP (2013) Effect of
solution phosphorus concentration on the exudation of oxalate

123

You might also like