Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0 Introduction
1.1 Background
This report summarizes the structural analysis and design of “The Proposed Building of “Mrs
Jasu Gurung” at PMC 15 Kaski. The analysis and design has been based on the prevailing
codes that are in practice in Nepal, the National Building code of Nepal and the IS code at places.
This report consists of the design procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs made in
the design and the design output.
Configuration of the building is rectangular shaped. It consists of Three storey with Stair cover.
Maximum length of the building is 13.53m and minimum width of the building is 7.46m. Plinth
height of the building is 0.45m.
2.1 General
The structure is analyzed with Finite Element Method (FEM). Beams and columns are modeled
as frame (line) elements with sufficient and appropriate meshing. Modulus of elasticity and
poisson’s ratio for the materials used are taken accordingly. The section properties used are based
on preliminary section sizing with consideration for deflection, minimum sizing specified and
serviceability. Computation for stiffness as a whole is carried out using FEM based latest
software.
Seismic Coefficient approach is carried out and it is applied for lateral seismic force distribution
generated with NBC 105 based spectral Function for soil type-II.
For section design and check, suitable load combinations as suggested in NBC 105:1994 and if
not covered in that, IS 1853-2002 is referred with consideration of envelopes of internal forces
developed.
Foundation design is carried out to satisfy strength and stability requirements.
1
2.2 Software used: (Introduction to Analysis software)
The analysis for the structural system was carried out using SAP 2014, SAP 2014 is a product of
computers and structures Inc, Berkeley. It is a FEM based software having facility of RC Design
based on IS- 456:2000.
Structural response under limit state of serviceability is thoroughly checked. The force and
stiffness relationship resulting the deflection under various load cases and combined action of
forces are duly evaluated. Basically short- term elastic deflection due to vertical loads and lateral
deflection due to seismic forces are of major importance along with the long-term defection of
beam elements under sustained loading condition due to shrinkage and creep are also taken into
account.
Maximum vertical deflection in all beam and slab elements that resulted under vertical load of
combined effect of self, imposed dead and live load are checked for critical elements and
maintained to be within permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term deflection
due to shrinkage and creep due to sustained loads are also maintained within permissible limits
for all the elements.
2
3.0 Analysis
a.Dead Load: The Dead load comprises the loads due to the materials used in the construction
and parts or components in a building. It consists of the loads due to structural elements like
beam, column, wall, slab, staircase, etc; finishes applied in the building and some permanent
structures like water tanks etc.
b. Imposed Load: The imposed load comprises the loads due to the physical contribution
of people and the loads due to the nature of occupancy, the furniture and other equipments which
are a part of the character of the occupancy. The imposed loads on the structural system are based
on the codal provisions as specified in IS 875(part2)-1987.
c.Earthquake load: The Earthquake load is the horizontal /lateral load induced by the ground
motion due to earthquakes. The design lateral load / force is considered in two orthogonal
horizontal directions of the structures. The earthquake induced lateral loads on the structural
system are based on the codal provisions as specified in NBC 105:1994.
Considering Architectural, Economic and strength demands, reinforced cement concrete (RCC) is
used as the major structural material, the selected material also confirms the availability and ease
in construction. The concrete grade used is M20 in general but M20 for structural columns
system above ground floor also. Fe 500 is provided as longitudinal and shear reinforcement is
structural elements wherever RCC is used.
Considerations of material for loading and strength parameter are as detailed below:
Concrete
1. Grade: M20
Characteristic Compressive strength: 20 N/mm2
Unit weight: 25.0 KN/m3
Young’s modulus of elasticity (E) = 22361000 KN/m2
Brick
Unit weight: 18.85 KN/m2
NOTE: During this design, brick is not considered as structural component and hence its strength
is not considered.
Finishing
Plaster
Unit Weight: 20.4 KN/m3
3
Floor Finish:
Specification: 50mm thick screed + punning on floor
Intensity: 1.02 KN/m2
Note: Additional load is considered for partition as well
Light partition ≈ 1.0 KN/m2
115mm thick brick wall ≈ 2.0 KN/m2
The earthquake induced lateral loads are determined and used from the spectral load cases based
on NBC 105: 1994: Spectrum for Soil Type II. Lateral load thus developed is the product of
structural seismic mass, modal response and respective spectral ordinates.
3.4 Load Cases
The following load cases were used for loading during the analysis:
Dead : Self Weight of the building structural components
Finish : Weight of the finishing of the slabs and staircases (including steps)
Wall : Wall loads (including plaster)
Live : Live load in the building area elements
Rlive : Live load in the roof both accessible and inaccessible
Ex : Spectral seismic load in X-Direction
Ey : Spectral seismic load in Y-Direction
4
3.6 Assumptions
The following assumptions are taken into consideration in the seismic resistant analysis and
design of structures:
Adequate supervision and quality systems are provided during execution of the works.
Construction is carried out by personnel having the appropriate skill and experience.
Construction materials and products confirm to the pertinent codes and specifications.
The structure is adequately maintained.
The structure is used in accordance with the design brief.
An earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with maximum flood, wind, waves or
tides.
Resonance as visualized under steady state sinusoidal excitation will not occur, as the
small duration of earthquake is not enough to build up resonance amplitudes.
Subsoil does not considerably settle or slide due to earthquake at the site of structure.
Adopt 7.50 KN /m
Adopt 9.80 KN /m
5
Tota
l
weig
ht 29.62 KN
UDL to be KN/
applied = total weight/Span = 8.84 m
Adopt
8.9KN /m
4 Wall load on all 5" thk internal wall building on 4.57m span beam
For all floor having opening(3’0”X7’0”X2)
* This consideration is made for the importance factor of educational building with likely larger
occupancy number.
6
ANALYSIS OUTPUTS
7
TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios
OutputCas
e StepType StepNum Period UX UY UZ SumUX SumUY
Text Text Unitless Sec Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless
MODAL Mode 1 0.693332 0.16172 0.7213 0.000007056 16% 72%
MODAL Mode 2 0.692097 0.71545 0.16418 0.000001529 88% 89%
MODAL Mode 3 0.624759 0.01017 0.00022 6.906E-07 89% 89%
MODAL Mode 4 0.241877 0.00725 0.08404 4.545E-07 89% 97%
MODAL Mode 5 0.239336 0.08405 0.0075 0.00002141 98% 98%
MODAL Mode 6 0.2185 0.00035 0.000002909 0.00001026 98% 98%
MODAL Mode 7 0.160764 0.00332 0.01857 0.00004366 98% 100%
MODAL Mode 8 0.159476 0.01463 0.00278 0.000003882 100% 100%
MODAL Mode 9 0.144854 0.00229 0.00035 1.954E-09 100% 100%
MODAL Mode 10 0.130622 0.00014 0.00065 0.00024 100% 100%
MODAL Mode 11 0.120522 0.00047 0.00008687 0.000005198 100% 100%
MODAL Mode 12 0.101096 0.000002121 3.848E-07 0.00001181 100% 100%
8
Sample Bending Moment Diagram
9
Design of Foundation
Modeling, analysis and design is carried out using the software. However design of the individual
elements is carried out manually. Results of the design output of beams and columns given by the
software are directly used but the design of slab, staircase and foundation is checked manually.
The sample calculation of the individual elements is presented below.
The reactions in the column bases for the foundation combination are as given below
Footing Pressure,
Pmax = P/A + My/Zy + Mz/Zz
Pmax 142.97 kN/m2
Pmin = P/A - My/Zy - Mz/Zz
Pmin 158.11 kN/m2
10
Eccentricity:
Y 0.90 mt
X 1.00 mt
L 1.9 mt
2/3 L 1.27 mt
b 1.8 mt
qu 225.8114 kN/m2
Eff. qu 225.8114 kN/m2
Shear Chk.
One way Shear : At distance d from face of column.
pt assumed 0.35 %
Designed shear
0.41 N/mm2
stress
vu 182.9072
d= 284.12 mm
d provided 300.00 mm
Flexure design:
11
pressure@c 154.23 kN/m2
Moment@ad, Mad 63.51 kNm
Mu 95.26 kNm
d req 189.23 mm
M/bd2 1.06
pt 0.260 %
Ast 781 mm2/m width
provide 12# @125c/c
Ast provided 814 mm2
Input Parameters
Length of shorter span (lx) = 3.11 m
Length of longer span (ly) = 3.73 m
Support condition 4
Slab type
= 26
= 1
(assumed) = 1.4
ly/lx = 1.20
Design two way slab
12
Partition load = 5.00 KN/m2
Total dead load = 9.45 KN/m2
Dead load + Live load = 12.45 KN/m2
Design load = 18.67 KN/m2
Area of steel
Solving quadratic equation
0.0250 Ast2 + -105.0000 Ast + 20958.3414 = 0
2
0.0250 Ast + -105.0000 Ast + 28144.0585 = 0
Bottom bars Top bars
Ast = 3989.8853 mm2 Ast = 3912.2466 mm2
2
Ast = 210.1147 mm Ast = 287.7534 mm2
Spacing required
8 rods @ 239.1 mm c/c Bottom bars
10 rods @ 272.8 mm c/c Top bars
Spacing provided
8 rods @ 150.0 mm c/c Bottom bars
10 rods @ 150.0 mm c/c Top bars
13
Check for deflection
= 26 fs = 181.927 = 1
= 1 = 1.400 = 1
Input Parameters
Length of cantilever slab (L) = 1.14 m
Slab type : Cantilever
= 7
= 1
(assumed) = 1.25
14
Design point load = 8.55 KN/m2
Area of steel
Solving quadratic equation
0.025 Ast2 + -105.00 Ast + 36917.07 = 0
Top bars
Ast = 3812.69 mm2
Ast = 387.31 mm2
Spacing required
10 rods @ 202.7 mm c/c Top bars
10 rods @ 405.4 mm c/c Bottom bars
Spacing provided
8 rods @ 150.0 mm c/c Top bars
10 rods @ 150.0 mm c/c Bottom bars
15
Design of Beams and Columns
The design of beams and columns are done from the software itself. However, it is to be notified
that the limitations of the design by the software have been evaluated and the adjustments have
been made accordingly. The samples (summary) of the design through the software based on
IS456: 2000 has been presented hereunder.
Output for the Reinforcement Area (Beams and Columns)/Critical Grid
Summary of Designs
16
IS 456:2000 Column Section Design
Column1 Column2
Lateral ties
(300x300) (300x300)
17
Ground 4 - 20dia. Bars 4 - 16dia. Bars
Floor 4 - 16dia. Bars 4 - 16dia. Bars
Beam
2 – 16dia TH. 2 – 16dia TH. 2 – 16dia TH. 2 – 16dia TH.
230 x 425mm
3 – 12dia EXT. 1– 12dia TH. 1 – 12dia TH.
Tie Beam 2-16 dia TH. 2-16 dia TH. 2-16dia TH. 2-16 dia TH.
230*230mm 1-16dia TH 1-16dia TH 1-16dia TH 1-16dia TH
Strap Beam
5-16 dia TH 4-16 dia TH 5-16 dia TH 4-16 dia TH
300*450
8 mm dia. vertical
8 mm dia. vertical
Vertical stirrups@100mm c/c upto L/4
stirrups@150mm c/c at mid span
stirrups from end of support
The site supervisions & quality test of the different constructions materials of
the proposed building do not undertaken by the structural engineer(herein the
Designer). Hence any failure or error occurred with the building due to the
non – implementation of the recommendations made in this report and
18
structural drwg. Or due to improper construction will not be the responsibility
of the Structural Engineer.
The structural analysis has been completed on the assumptions that the
proposed building shall be constructed under the proper supervisions of
skilled technical person.
Also the structural engineer will not responsible for sub soil explorations at
the site. The foundation design has been completed only based on the
condition of soil strata upto one metre depth at the site of the concerned
building.
REFERENCES
1) Jain, A.K- R.C.CLimit State Design, Nem Chand & Bros, Roorkee, 1990
2) Shah & Kale- R.C.C Design, Macmillan India Limited
3) Ashok k. Jain- Advanced Structural Analysis, Nem Chand & Bros, Roorkee, 1990
4) S.S. Bhavikati-Structural Analysis- II, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
5) V.N. Vazirani- Analysis of Structures-II, Khanna Publishers
6) S. Ramamrutham-Theory of Structures, DhanpatRai Publishing Company
Codes
1) I.S. 456-2000 -Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete
2) I S. 456-1978 -Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete ( S.P.-16 )
3) S.P.34-1987 - Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement and Detailing
4) I S 1893-2003 - Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design Structure
5) NBC 105:1994, Seismic Design of Building in Nepal
6) NBC 1994 FOR Ductile Detailing for RCC Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces
7) I S 13920-1993 -Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to
Seismic forces
8) I S 875-1987 -Code of practice for Design Loads for Buildings and Structures
Part 1- Dead Loads
Part 2- Imposed Loads
Designed by
Er.Sailesh Adhikari
(NEC .Regd No.10059)
Phone no:9856061070
19