Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Previous studies have shown that site-city interaction (SCI) is important for sustainable
seismic design in a congested urban environment. However, due to its complexity, the
phenomenon is not yet fully understood. A fully integrated 3D model was developed herein to
analyze the problem using a transportation hub in Hong Kong as a testbed. The site assumes a
typical downtown layout with a central plaza, a large underground chamber surrounded by 16
high-rise buildings with deep foundations. This investigation aims to explore SCI emphasizing
soil-underground structure-soil interaction (SUSSI) and contamination of the site response
caused by the dense building cluster. To simulate visco-elastic wave propagation, a
discontinuous Galerkin spectral element code (SPEED) is employed. Key SCI effects manifest in
a wavefield propagating from the buildings and surface waves trapped in-between them. The
propagated wavefield travels up to 450 m with 20% increase in peak ground accelerations (PGA)
compared with the free field. In the center plaza, 70% increase in PGA is observed. Furthermore,
a coherency analysis was conducted to quantify the spatial variation of ground motions. The
building layout and subsurface structures govern the SCI phenomena, which highlights the
importance of realistic fully integrated modeling for sustainable urban design.
INTRODUCTION
Safety and sustainability of ever-growing metropolises are at the forefront of civil
engineering research. With the advancement in technology, the need for intellectual labor force
has been booming. Centers for economic, financial and technological industries are found in
large cities. This results in a rapid growth of urban developments and population alike.
Accordingly, cities get more and more congested. Taller buildings and larger underground spaces
are built in close proximity to accommodate the rapid growth of municipal population. From an
earthquake engineering perspective, this raises concern for the safety of high economic valued
sites, such as transportation hubs. These priority sites necessitate far-seeing urban planning and
cutting-edge design to ensure long-term safety, sustainability and possible further development.
Nevertheless, seismic design of structures is routinely carried out using conventional methods
that consider structures in isolation. As shown by post-earthquake observations of erratic damage
patterns in cities of Mexico, Japan and Italy (Flores et al. 1987; Uenishi 2011), it became
obvious that the built surrounding can significantly change both structural and site response. The
cause of such phenomenon is collectively called Site-City Interaction (SCI). To this end, seismic
design of a structure in isolation is not comprehensive and potentially unsafe. Fully integrated
analysis on the seismic response of building clusters is suggested for the resilient design of tall
buildings, i.e. simultaneous modeling of soil, above and underground structures. SCI can be
described as the cumulative effect of site response, Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction (SSSI)
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 313
and Soil-Underground Structure-Soil Interaction (SUSSI). Figure 1 shows some of the key
phenomena. Beatings are the results of the feedback vibrations from the buildings’ reaction and
their inertial effects. Resultant waves from beating can interact with the surrounding structural
environment. Conversely, they could travel outward from the building cluster, thus amplifying
the seismic demand of nearby areas. Furthermore, due to SUSSI, waves get trapped between
subsurface structures such as foundations or metro stations. These phenomena will be identified
in the present study.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 314
elliptical layout. In the following, a detailed description of SCI phenomenon is given based on
fully integrated 3D analyses. The site and the design of the numerical experiment were chosen to
study whether underground structures can modify the ground motions and whether waves get
trapped and amplified between these structures, as theorized by the authors. Furthermore, the
experiment was designed to examine questions regarding the importance of realistic site settings;
such as would the circular-like geometry of the building layout would be reflected in the
disturbed wavefield between and around the structures under a real earthquake scenario? The
case study highlights the influence of underground structures, special building layouts and
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
outward propagating waves in the outskirts of this typical downtown setting. In the end, the
authors discuss the key concerns and implications of SCI on resilient and sustainable seismic
design in a congested urban environment.
MODEL CREATION
The testbed for our simulation is Kowloon metro station in Hong Kong, a transportation hub
with one of the largest traffic and highest population density. A 12m deep metro station that
supports an additional 18-meter superstructure is located in the middle of Union Square. The
square is surrounded by 16 closely-spaced super-tall buildings, including the tallest tower of
Hong Kong (480m), the International Commerce Centre (ICC). The site is illustrated in Figure 2.
Such a building layout is typical of Hong Kong and many major cities of the world. The
Kowloon transport hub accommodates some of the most expensive real estates of the city and
it’s subjected to further development. The density, complexity, and priority of the site make it an
ideal testbed for this SCI study.
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 315
Soil domain
Soil conditions at the study site are typical of Hong Kong’s harbor front. According to
borehole data acquired from the Buildings Department of the Hong Kong Government, a 30-
meter layer of hydraulic fill is on the top of the site, followed by completely decomposed granite
(CDG) to the bedrock at around 100 meters in depth. Properties of these materials are presented
in Table 1. Based on this soil profile, a 1.8 1.80.15 km visco-elastic model was created with
5-layer of soils and a building cluster with a footprint of 1.4 km2 placed in the center. The shear
wave velocities of soils were calculated based on SPT-N values according to Wair et al. (2012).
A piecewise linear shear wave velocity profile was adopted for the soil domain to account for
effects of overburden pressure. A Poisson’s ratio of 0.33, typical for elastic soil, is adopted (i.e.
Vp=2Vs, where Vp is compression wave velocity and V s is shear wave velocity) to ensure the
stability of the absorbing boundary (Stacey 1988) prescribed on the bottom of the domain. On
the sides of the domain, Dirichlet boundary conditions are prescribed restricting movement in
vertical and ‘y' direction, while allowing displacement in the ‘x’ direction. The model is
subjected to an excitation fitting the 2475-year return period design spectra specified for Hong
Kong (Arup 2015), as shown in Figure 3, which is an outcrop motion recorded during the Chi-
Chi earthquake selected from the Design Ground Motion Library (Wang et al. 2015). The ground
motion was deconvoluted to the bedrock and applied as a vertically propagating shear wave in
the horizontal “x” direction. The predominant frequency of the acceleration is about 2.2 Hz,
while the natural frequency of the soil site is 1.1 Hz. Hence, resonance is not expected, however,
the frequency gap is small enough for significant ground motion amplification. SPEED uses
frequency proportional damping defined by the quality factor Q=Q0*(f/f0), where Q0 is the
quality factor evaluated at a reference frequency f0 . f0=4Hz is chosen as the majority of signal
energy is contained between 1 and 7 Hz. Q=20 is assigned to the soil layers, while Q=100 is
assigned for the granitic rock. Polynomial degree p=3 is selected for the basis function to ensure
at least 5 spectral points per wavelength in the soil for desired numerical accuracy up to 5 Hz.
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 316
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 317
details of calculating these parameters. The metro station is modeled as a hollow box sunk 12
meters deep into the soil. It has 1m thick walls and dimensions of 57×127×30m. Concrete
material properties are assigned to the material that gives it significant weight and stiffness.
Monitoring points are placed on the surface of each structure. As shown in Figure 4, a regular
20×20m grid of monitoring points on the soil surface and on three vertical cross-sections are
utilized to track ground motions. Six special monitoring points [1]-[6] are selected to analyze
ground motions and their spatial variability. The points in the outskirt were chosen to capture
motions 100m from the perimeter of the building cluster following the building layout’s pattern.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
While the points in the central plaza are meant to capture motions in the center of the open
spaces on each side of the metro station where the largest disturbance of the wavefield is
observed.
Meshing
Meshing is a challenging yet important procedure for complex geometries. For SEM analysis
a high-quality mesh is fundamental. The scaled Jacobian is a commonly used metric to define
mesh quality. FEM and SEM analyses necessitate a minimum value of 0.2, preferably 0.5 to
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 318
guarantee efficient and precise modeling of the displacement field. Owing to the capabilities of
SPEED to deal with non-conforming meshes, the meshing procedure is eased. Eight sub-domains
were created and meshed independently, by assigning discontinuous interfaces between the soil
and each foundation. Consequently, a very high-quality mesh is achieved for our model. The
minimum scaled Jacobian is 0.23. Moreover, 99.4% of the elements are above 0.7. An advanced
meshing software, TRELIS, was used to generate the hexahedral mesh on a CAD model of the
site and the structures. Superstructures and foundations have a mesh size ranging from 8 to 15
meters, depending on their complexity, while the soil domain is meshed with elements scaling
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
gradually from 15 meters up to 75 meters towards the domain boundaries. The mesh sizes (h)
and polynomial degrees (p) were carefully chosen in pairs to achieve the desired 5 spectral nodes
per wavelength whilst, guaranteeing the lowest possible computational cost. The final model
consists of 117,000 elements. Visualization of the subdomains, the mesh, and the soil layers are
depicted in Figure 5. Each color in Figure 5a represents a non-conforming sub-domain with
discontinuous interfaces between them.
FIG. 5. Meshed geometry, non-conforming sub-domains (a) and soil layers (b)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Time history data
During the simulation, SPEED records displacement values at 33,000 grid points as
mentioned in the previous section. Figure 6 is a snapshot of total displacements at 16.4 seconds
when peak ground displacement (PGD) occurs. Several regions displace close to the PGD value
(20 cm) at both sides of the central plaza and along a ring in the outskirts resembling the shape of
the building layout at about 30 meters from the edge of the foundations. SCI and SUSSI are
clearly present. An outward propagating wavefield can be observed in the figure. This wavefield
is strongest on –X and +Y side of the cluster. The large mass of structures B, F, G, and H
represent a greater obstacle for the propagating wave, hence the ground motion is most disturbed
in their vicinity. A significant increase in displacements can be seen amid buildings. The surface
waves get trapped and focused between the metro station and the foundations creating an
injection of energy into the soft soil in between them. The distinct patterns of the propagating
wavefield and the focused zones of motion amid buildings highlight the significance of building
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 319
layouts in fully integrated modeling. The superstructures show a flexural response that is lagging
compared to the soil response. On the other hand, all building foundations move in sync as a unit
but, the superstructures assume different modal shapes according to their dynamic properties.
The metro station mostly moves together with the base of the buildings. However, it is more
compliant with soil displacements.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 320
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
E v x, t dt
2
(2)
t0
where E is the velocity signal energy and v(x,t) is the velocity signal at monitor x integrated from
the initial time (t0) until the end (tf) of the signal. The ratio between free-field and SCI velocity
signal energies are highlighted in Figure 9. This metric clearly highlights ground motion
contamination caused by the presence of transport hub. It can be interpreted as a direct indicator
of the increased risk on structures in the area. The driving energy contained in the soil can
increase by up to 50% due to the presence of buildings. Such energy increase is observed in a
well-defined circular manner caused by beating and inertial response of the buildings. The rings
of increased energy can be observed up to 500 meters in the outskirts of the hub. A significant
increase up to 30% can also be noted amid buildings and the metro station. This observation
suggests strong SUSSI. Beating and site response jointly generate surface waves that get trapped
between underground structures. Based on motions recorded on the vertical profiles it becomes
evident that surface waves play a principal role in SUSSI. Contamination of the wavefield can
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 321
only be observed in the top 5 to 8 meters of the soil. The preceding observations might raise a
safety concern for future developments near the transport hub and secondary structures in the
center plaza.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Time (s)
FIG. 8. Comparison of acceleration and velocity histories at points [4] [5]
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 322
excitation while, energy decrease around structures is comparable. Figure 10 depicts the
amplification functions of Fourier spectra between points 2, 4, 5 and 6.
Amplifications between monitor 4 in the outskirt and 5 within the building layout is rather
significant, further stressing the importance of fully integrated SCI simulations and SUSSI.
Largest amplifications occur at 1.5, 3 and 4.7 Hz. These are vibration modes of the surface
waves based on the size of the plaza. Monitor 5 versus 6 have similar amplification pattern but
smaller peaks. Amplification between monitor 6 versus 2 is not very obvious. Not shown in the
figure, when compared with the free field motion, amplification functions of monitors 1 to 6
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
show peaks at around the same frequencies as point 5 vs 4 in Figure 10. Overall, the
amplification factors for inner monitors are larger than the ones in the outskirt.
Spatial Coherency
The spatial coherency of accelerations is examined amongst special monitoring points in
Figure 4. Such statistical methods are commonly used to quantify ground motion variability
based on recorded data to better predict the seismic demand at different locations within a region
(Huang and Wang 2015; Zerva and Zervas 2002). Here the coherency function is calculated as
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 323
(3):
sjkM f
f (3)
sjjM f skkM f
where s jkM (f) is the smoothed cross-spectral density between monitor j and k,
s jjM f and skkM f are the smoothed power spectral density at monitor j and k, respectively.
The smoothing of the spectra is performed using an 11-point Hamming window with 5-point
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
overlap between each windowing following Abrahamson (1992). To ensure our data is a 2nd
order stationary random process, the strong motion was windowed between 13 and 23 s then
cosine tapered.
Coherencies are described in Figure 11. Overall, the coherency reduces at higher frequencies.
It is observed that motions inside (5 vs 6) has slightly lower coherency than motions outside the
building layout (1 vs 2, 2 vs 3, 1 vs 3). Largest incoherency is observed between the far-field
motions (FF) and point 5, showing the effects of SCI.
CONCLUSIONS
The aim of this study was to explore SUSSI and SCI effects by realistic, fully integrated 3D
simulations of a transportation hub. Key SCI phenomena are a wavefield propagating from the
buildings and surface waves trapped in-between them. Entrapment and refraction of waves
between underground structures are demonstrated by the simulation showing the existence of
SUSSI and its importance. In the center plaza, about two-fold amplification of the free-field PGA
is observed due to SUSSI. The propagated wavefield travels up to 450m with accelerations
0.7m/s2 higher (20% increase) than the free field PGA. Distinctive patterns in velocity signal
energy ratios, between SCI and free-field case, follow the shape of the building layout in the
outskirts with a ratio between 1.25 and 1.5 up to 500 meters. This outward propagating wavefield
follows the shape of the building layout while waves in the plaza get trapped and amplified. This
suggests that the geometry of the building layout will significantly affect the propagation of
waves and their intensity. Last, a coherency analysis was conducted to quantify the spatial
variation of ground motions. The key SCI phenomena are governed by the layout of buildings
and subsurface structures, this highlights the importance of a realistic fully integrated model for
sustainable urban design. Conclusions derived from this study highlight the importance of site-
specific seismic design in a densely populated environment. Well-developed cities must ensure
the safety of the urban population and developments of high economic values. Constructions in
the neighborhood of high rise building clusters must be carefully designed with the consideration
of SCI effects. For example, less resilient secondary structures may be adversely affected by the
SCI effects. Although the building layout in this study is common in metropolises, further
realistic SCI studies should be conducted to help large cities located in seismic zones make
educated decisions regarding strategies in financial and insurance policies as well as urban
planning.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge support from Hong Kong RGC grant no. 16213615 and Intergroup
Collaborative Research Program from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
of HKUST.
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 324
REFERENCES
Abrahamson, N. (1992). "Spatial Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion for Application to
Soil-Structure Interaction." Final Report EPRI-TR--100463-TIER1.
ARUP (2015). "Seismic hazard analysis of the Hong Kong region. GEO Report No. 311, Civil
Engineering Development Department, Hong Kong SAR.
Bard, P., Chazelas, J., Guéguen, P., Kham, M., and Semblat, J. (2006). "Site-City Interaction."
Assessing and Managing Earthquake Risk, 91-114.
Dashti, S., Hashash, Y., Gillis, K., Musgrove, M., and Walker, M. (2016). "Development of
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
© ASCE
IACGE 2018
IACGE 2018 325
Stacey, R. (1988). "Improved transparent boundary formulations for the elastic-wave equation."
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 78(6), 2089-2097.
Taborda, R., and Bielak, J. (2011). "Full 3D integration of site-city effects in regional scale
earthquake simulations." Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Structural
Dynamics, Eurodyn, Leuven Belgium, 511-518.
Uenishi, K. (2011). "Multiple ground-structure interactions and dynamic collective behaviour of
a group of structures." 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN
2011, Katholike Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 490-494.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 01/20/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Wair, B. R., DeJong, J. T., and Shantz, T. (2012). Guidelines for estimation of shear wave
velocity profiles. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Wang, G., Youngs, R., Power, M., Li, Z. (2015). "Design Ground Motion Library (DGML): an
interactive tool for selecting earthquake ground motions." Earthquake Spectra, 31(2), 617-
635.
Zerva, A., and Zervas, V. (2002). "Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: an overview."
Appl.Mech.Rev., 55(3), 271-297.
© ASCE
IACGE 2018