TH ND: 2) The Results Are Related To The Test Performed at Location Shown by Client

CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED CORRIDOR BY INTEGRATING
EJIPURA MAINROAD/INNER RING ROAD JUNCTION, SONY WORLD

JUNCTION AND KENDRIYA SADAN, KARNATAKA
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING
ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
(PILE NO. P22-2)
(LOCATION: KORAMANGALA)
MAIN CLIENT : Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
CONSULTANT : Infra Support Engg. Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
CONTRACTOR : M/s. Simplex Infrastructure Ltd.

(CLIENT FOR GD) Sony World Flyover Project (C3191),
C/o. Divya Darshan Building,
# 110, Koramangala, 6th Block (2nd Floor),
Opp. Sri Krishna Sagar Restaurant,
Near Koramangala Club – 560 095
TEST AGENCY : M/s. GEO DYNAMICS

‘Anand’, 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society,
Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park,
Baroda -390 023.
Tele / Fax: +91-265-2388139, 2321205
PROJECT NO. : PDA-F155-01
DATE : August 6, 2018
Note: 1) This test report or part of the same shall not be reproduced without written permission from the GEO DYNAMICS
2) The results are related to the test performed at location shown by client
Doc. No.: F/5.10/01A/Issue No.01/Issue Date: 01-10-2017/ Amend No.:00 / Amend Date:-- / Page 1 of 16
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS
3. TEST EQUIPMENT
4. PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS
5. CAPWAP ANALYSIS
6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
7. CONCLUSIONS
TABLES
TABLE 1 : SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS
TABLE 2 : SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A : CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR PILE NO. P22-2
Rv/Nm
Project No.: PDA-F155-01 August 6, 2018
CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED CORRIDOR BY INTEGRATING EJIPURA MAINROAD/INNER

RING ROAD JUNCTION, SONY WORLD JUNCTION AND KENDRIYA SADAN, KARNATAKA
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
PILE NO. P22-2
LOCATION: KORAMANGALA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
M/s. Geo Dynamics was engaged by M/s. Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. to conduct high-strain
dynamic test on one r. c. bored pile installed at the above project site.
The aim of testing was to evaluate pile static capacity and measure the settlement. The field test
was conducted on 1st August, 2018. The Testing was conducted by Mr. Velupurugan P. This report
presents the results of dynamic pile testing and analysis performed using the Pile Driving Analyzer
(PDA) and CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program (CAPWAP). The test was conducted in accordance
with ASTM D4945.
2.0 PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS
The pile was r. c. bored pile with diameter of 1200mm, details of which are given below. The pile
was tested using 7.0 tons hammer falling height ranging from 0.5m to 2.0m.
Pile No. P22-2
Pile length below gages 8.49 m
Pile length below grade 8.29 m
Concrete Grade M35
Pile Diameter 1200mm
Hammer Weight 7.0 T
Drop Height 2.0 m
Working Load 520 T
Test Load 780 T
Soil Data Availability Not Available
Project No.: PDA-F155-01
3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT
A Pile Driving Analyzer and its associated pile top force and velocity transducers were used to
conduct the dynamic pile test.
Two strain transducers and two accelerometers were attached to the pile head. They were mounted
on opposite sides of the pile to cancel bending effects during each strike of the hammer. The
signals of strain and acceleration were conditioned and processed by PDA.
The PDA is a micro-processor based signal conditioner and digital computer. Signals of pile top
force and velocity were measured and analyzed during each strike of the pile driving hammer and
stored in the Analyzer. The pile top force and velocity-time curves were displayed on PDA screen.
The PDA onsite uses a program based on closed form Case-Goble solutions to compute static pile
capacity from the pile top force and velocity data. This is subsequently checked with the computer
program CAPWAP to confirm the static pile capacity obtained on site.
4.0 PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS
Dynamic testing on the pile was conducted by striking the pile with the hammer during the restriking
process. During testing of the pile, complete dynamic measurements were obtained for each
hammer blow delivered to the pile. The field results along with comments are summarized in Table
1. The PDA measures the total (static plus dynamic) resistance acting on the pile. The portion of
total resistance that is computed as static resistance by the Analyzer is determined by the soil
damping factor Jc set into the analyzer. A more accurate independent measure of the applicable
soil-damping factor was determined using a CAPWAP analysis.
The values measured by the PDA on field are obtained assuming that the pile is uniform throughout
its length. Also, the soil parameters like quake and damping should be assumed during the field
test. Hence the CAPWAP is mandatory for all bored piles to estimate realistic soil parameters as
well as pile profile. Typically one of the blows that is close to the test load is subjected to CAPWAP
analysis. In summary, PDA measures the field capacity while CAPWAP refines the field results and
hence field capacities measured using PDA may not match with the CAPWAP analysis.
The BETA Value (Integrity Factor) indicates change in the pile impedance and is derived from the
CAPWAP analysis. The PDA is basically used to compute capacity and the BETA factor.
Particularly for bored piles BETA may never be 100% due to inherent nature of installation. A BETA
factor less than 60% indicates a shaft with poor integrity. Such shaft may require remedial action in
the form of reduced loads, redesigning the cap or installation of additional pile as recommended by
the engineer to the project. General guidelines for the assessment of pile integrity are presented in
table below.
INTEGRITY
COMMENT
(BETA FACTOR)
100% OK
80%-99% Minor Defect
60%-80% Some Defect
< 60% Major Defect
The PDA field capacity is estimated by either RMX or RSU for an assumed Jc value and on the
assumption of uniform cross-section of the pile. RMX is the maximum Case-Goble Resistance
(Maximum Capacity) for the assume Jc value (Case Damping) at the project site. The RMX
capacity generally holds good when the pile shows a reasonable movement under the load. The
RSU capacity is applicable when there is very high skin friction and in most cases the pile
movement is nominal. Hence a more realistic estimate of the pile capacity is obtained from the
CAPWAP analysis conducted on one typical blow at the end of testing program.
5.0 CAPWAP ANALYSIS
A selected PDA field recording of force and velocity data for a blow delivered to the pile was further
analyzed using the computer software CAPWAP. The analysis involved applying the measured pile
top velocity time record to the top of a lumped-mass and spring wave equation model of the pile.
The program computes the pile top force-time record and this is then compared to the actual
measured force-time record. The pile and soil resistance model is then adjusted in an iterative
procedure until good match is obtained between measured and computed forces.
The pile and soil models can then be used to determine the estimated static load-settlement curve.
The results of CAPWAP analysis for a typical blow are briefly summarized in Table 2.
6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
6.1 Pile No. P22-2
The CAPWAP analysis results for Pile No. P22-2 showed that the pile had achieved an ultimate
capacity of 785.3 tons at the time of testing. This resistance is 1.5 times the design/working load.
The net settlement for the subject pile is 4.0mm. Note that as per HSDPT principle, the pile
achieves an ultimate capacity when the permanent set is at least 3-4mm per blow.
The CAPWAP results showed that the maximum compressive stress experienced by the pile at the
hammer impact was about 18.3 N/mm2. This stress is within the allowable stress limits. The pile
integrity was observed to be 81% at pile toe from test level which can be termed as minor
impedance reduction at that level & within limits. The pile integrity is classified as acceptable.
From CAPWAP analysis, the pile top load vs. settlement curve is obtained by simulating static
load test. The pile top settlement at 780 tons (equivalent test load for static test) is estimated to be
around 8.5mm. Please refer to static analysis in Appendix A.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
1. The CAPWAP analysis results for Pile No. P22-2 showed that the pile had achieved an
ultimate capacity of 785.3 tons at the time of testing which is more than required test load of
780.0 tons.
2. The pile integrity is classified as acceptable.
3. Note that as per HSDPT principle, the pile achieves an ultimate capacity when the
permanent set is at least 3-4mm per blow
4. The stresses in the pile were within the acceptable limits during any stage of testing.
5. This report has been prepared with generally accepted high strain dynamic pile testing
practices and as per ASTM D4945. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The
findings provided in this report are based on the result of the individual pile tested and
information made available to us.
TABLES
TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS
Height Pile Capacity (Tons) Net Total

Sr.
Pile No. of Fall Settlement Settlement Comments
No.
(m) RMX RSU (mm) (mm)
1. 0.5 320.3 50.3 0.0 4.0 --
2. 1.0 467.4 0.0 0.0 7.0 --
3. P22-2 1.5 488.3 0.0 2.0 11.0 --
4. 1.5 520.2 130.5 2.0 13.0 --
Used For
5. 2.0 798.6 209.5 2.0 9.0
Analysis
TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS
Required / Permissible
Pile No. P22-2
Limits
Pile Capacity 785.3 tons 1.5 x Design Load
Skin Friction 248.0 tons --
End Bearing 537.3 tons --
Set per blow 4.0 mm 3-4 mm
Total Displacement 13.0 mm --
Compressive Stress 18.3 N/mm2 0.85fck
Pile Integrity (80%-99% classified as

Acceptable
(Below Sensor Level) minor defect)
APPENDIX A
CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR
PILE NO. P22-2
SIMPLEX; Pile: P22-2 Test: 01-Aug-2018 16:10:
1200MM; Blow: 5 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
CAPWAP SUMMARY RESULTS
Total CAPWAP Capacity: 7853.9; along Shaft 2480.7; at Toe 5373.2 kN
Soil Dist. Depth Ru Force Sum Unit Unit Smith Quake
Sgmnt Below Below in Pile of Resist. Resist. Damping
No. Gages Grade Ru (Depth) (Area) Factor
m m kN kN kN kN/m kPa s/m mm
7853.9
1 2.1 1.9 0.9 7853.0 0.9 0.47 0.12 0.455 1.018
2 4.2 4.0 9.8 7843.2 10.7 4.62 1.22 0.455 1.021
3 6.4 6.2 559.3 7283.9 570.0 263.51 69.90 0.455 1.021
4 8.5 8.3 1910.7 5373.2 2480.7 900.21 238.78 0.455 0.988
Avg. Shaft 620.2 299.24 79.37 0.455 0.995
Toe 5373.2 4750.94 0.114 5.901
Soil Model Parameters/Extensions Shaft Toe
Case Damping Factor 0.095 0.052

Damping Type Smith
Unloading Quake (% of loading quake) 200 95
Reloading Level (% of Ru) 100 100
Unloading Level (% of Ru) 45
Resistance Gap (included in Toe Quake) (mm) 0.282
Soil Plug Weight (kN) 68.09
Soil Support Dashpot 0.500 2.444
Soil Support Weight (kN) 40.01 40.01
CAPWAP match quality = 5.14 (Wave Up Match) ; RSA = 0

Observed: final set = 4.000 mm; blow count = 250 b/m
Computed: final set = 3.164 mm; blow count = 316 b/m
max. Top Comp. Stress = 18.3 MPa (T= 21.5 ms, max= 1.000 x Top)
max. Comp. Stress = 18.3 MPa (Z= 1.1 m, T= 21.5 ms)
max. Tens. Stress = -6.04 MPa (Z= 5.3 m, T= 25.3 ms)
max. Energy (EMX) = 58.96 kJ; max. Measured Top Displ. (DMX)= 8.12 mm
Page 1 Analysis: 06-Aug-2018
EXTREMA TABLE
Pile Dist. max. min. max. max. max. max. max.
Sgmnt Below Force Force Comp. Tens. Trnsfd. Veloc. Displ.
No. Gages Stress Stress Energy
m kN kN MPa MPa kJ m/s mm
1 1.1 20656.2 -2943.1 18.3 -2.60 58.96 1.3 7.966
2 2.1 20624.4 -4056.6 18.2 -3.59 57.69 1.3 7.942
3 3.2 20160.2 -5573.4 17.8 -4.93 56.78 1.3 7.868
4 4.2 19457.5 -6267.7 17.2 -5.54 55.53 1.3 7.843
5 5.3 19097.7 -6835.8 16.9 -6.04 53.39 1.4 7.769
6 6.4 18391.5 -6509.3 16.3 -5.76 52.69 1.6 7.686
7 7.4 15772.3 -5714.2 13.9 -5.05 45.66 1.9 7.602
8 8.5 12355.1 -2351.6 10.9 -2.08 25.63 2.1 7.516
Absolute 1.1 18.3 (T = 21.5 ms)
5.3 -6.04 (T = 25.3 ms)
CASE METHOD
J = 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
RP 13547.8 11322.1 9096.5 6870.9 4645.2 2419.6 193.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
RX 13547.8 11322.1 9719.8 9719.8 9719.8 9719.8 9719.8 9719.8 9719.8 9719.8
RU 13547.8 11322.1 9096.5 6870.9 4645.2 2419.6 193.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
RAU = 8339.5 (kN); RA2 = 4397.7 (kN)
Current CAPWAP Ru = 7853.9 (kN); Corresponding J(RP)= 0.26;

RMX requires higher damping; see PDA-W
VMX TVP VT1*Z FT1 FMX DMX DFN SET EMX QUS
m/s ms kN kN kN mm mm mm kJ kN
1.32 20.97 15617.3 20186.8 20407.4 8.115 4.000 4.000 59.3 9792.3
PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Depth Area E-Modulus Spec. Weight Perim.
m cm2 MPa kN/m3 m
0.00 11309.73 44070.1 24.500 3.770
8.49 11309.73 44070.1 24.500 3.770
Toe Area 1.131 m2
Segmnt Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Compression Perim. Soil

Number B.G. Change Slack Eff. Slack Eff. Plug
m kN/m/s % mm mm m kN
1 1.06 11867.17 0.00 500.000 0.400 -0.000 0.000 3.770 0.00

2 2.12 15367.17 29.49 50.000 0.500 -0.000 0.000 3.770 0.00
3 3.18 15367.17 29.49 500.000 0.100 -0.000 0.000 3.770 0.00
4 4.25 13867.17 16.85 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000 3.770 15.00
5 5.31 11867.17 0.00 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000 3.770 15.00
6 6.37 11867.17 0.00 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000 3.770 0.00

Segmnt Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Compression Perim. Soil
Number B.G. Change Slack Eff. Slack Eff. Plug
m kN/m/s % mm mm m kN
7 7.43 11867.17 0.00 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000 3.770 10.00

8 8.49 9567.17 -19.38 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000 3.770 10.00
Pile Damping 2.0 %, Time Incr 0.253 ms, Wave Speed 4200.0 m/s, 2L/c 4.0 ms
SIMPLEX; Pile: P22-2; 1200MM; Blow: 5 (Test: 01-Aug-2018 16:10:) 06-Aug-2018

GEO DYNAMICS CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
30000 kN 30000 kN
Force Msd Force Msd
Force Cpt Velocity Msd
15000 15000
5 55 ms 5 55 ms
0 0
16 L/c 16 L/c
Pile
-15000 -15000
Load (kN) 1200

Pile Top
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 Shaf t Resistance
0.000 Bottom
900 Distribution
k N /m
600
Ru = 7853.9 kN
3.750 Rs = 2480.7 kN
300
D is p la c e m e n t (m m )
Rb = 5373.2 kN
Dy = 9.0 mm
Dx = 13.0 mm 0
7.500 Pile Force
2000 at Ru
kN
4000
11.250
6000
8000
15.000
CAPWAP(R) 2006-2 Licensed to GEO DYNAMICS

STATIC ANALYSIS
Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe
Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN mm kN mm
0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000

3 237.6 0.107 62.3 0.068
6 475.3 0.214 124.6 0.137
9 712.9 0.321 187.0 0.205
12 950.6 0.428 249.3 0.274
15 1188.2 0.535 311.6 0.342
18 1425.9 0.642 373.9 0.411
21 1663.5 0.749 436.2 0.479
24 1901.1 0.856 498.5 0.548
27 2138.8 0.963 560.9 0.616
30 2375.6 1.070 623.2 0.684
33 2600.0 1.175 685.5 0.753
36 2802.3 1.277 747.8 0.821
40 3039.8 1.407 830.9 0.913
44 3240.7 1.532 914.0 1.004
49 3438.5 1.679 1017.9 1.118
57 3664.7 1.900 1184.0 1.300
67 3872.5 2.163 1391.8 1.528
77 4080.2 2.427 1599.5 1.757
87 4287.9 2.690 1807.2 1.985
97 4495.7 2.954 2015.0 2.213
107 4703.4 3.217 2222.7 2.441
117 4911.1 3.481 2430.4 2.669
127 5118.8 3.744 2638.1 2.897
137 5326.6 4.008 2845.9 3.125
147 5534.3 4.271 3053.6 3.354
157 5742.0 4.535 3261.3 3.582
167 5949.7 4.798 3469.0 3.810
177 6157.5 5.062 3676.8 4.038
187 6362.6 5.325 3881.9 4.266
198 6573.5 5.612 4092.8 4.517
210 6785.1 5.922 4304.4 4.791
223 6992.6 6.254 4511.9 5.087
236 7177.5 6.582 4696.8 5.384
250 7351.4 6.931 4870.7 5.703
264 7499.0 7.275 5018.3 6.023
278 7620.3 7.615 5139.6 6.342
292 7715.5 7.951 5234.8 6.661
306 7784.4 8.282 5303.7 6.981
320 7827.0 8.609 5346.3 7.300
329 7840.6 8.816 5359.9 7.506
334 7843.4 8.931 5362.7 7.620
336 7843.6 8.977 5362.9 7.665
337 7853.9 9.001 5373.2 7.688


STATIC ANALYSIS
kN mm kN mm
352 7853.9 9.343 5373.2 8.030

367 7853.9 9.685 5373.2 8.372
382 7853.9 10.028 5373.2 8.715
397 7853.9 10.370 5373.2 9.057
412 7853.9 10.712 5373.2 9.399
427 7853.9 11.054 5373.2 9.741
442 7853.9 11.396 5373.2 10.083
457 7853.9 11.739 5373.2 10.426
472 7853.9 12.081 5373.2 10.768
487 7853.9 12.423 5373.2 11.110
500 7853.9 12.720 5373.2 11.407
507 7853.9 12.879 5373.2 11.566
510 7853.9 12.948 5373.2 11.635
512 7853.9 12.993 5373.2 11.680
517 7616.3 12.886 5310.9 11.612
520 7378.6 12.779 5248.6 11.543
523 7141.0 12.672 5186.2 11.475
526 6903.3 12.565 5123.9 11.407
529 6665.7 12.458 5061.6 11.338
532 6428.0 12.351 4999.3 11.270
535 6190.4 12.244 4937.0 11.201
538 5952.8 12.137 4874.7 11.133
541 5715.1 12.030 4812.3 11.064
544 5478.3 11.923 4750.0 10.996
547 5253.9 11.818 4687.7 10.927
550 5051.6 11.716 4625.4 10.859
554 4814.1 11.586 4542.3 10.768
558 4613.2 11.462 4459.2 10.677
563 4415.4 11.315 4355.3 10.562
571 4189.2 11.094 4189.2 10.380
581 3981.4 10.830 3981.4 10.152
591 3773.7 10.567 3773.7 9.924
601 3566.0 10.303 3566.0 9.696
611 3358.2 10.039 3358.2 9.467
621 3150.5 9.776 3150.5 9.239
631 2942.8 9.512 2942.8 9.011
641 2735.1 9.249 2735.1 8.783
646 2631.2 9.117 2631.2 8.669
649 2568.9 9.038 2568.9 8.601
650 2548.1 9.012 2548.1 8.578
651 2527.3 8.985 2527.3 8.555
661 2319.6 8.722 2319.6 8.327
671 2111.9 8.458 2111.9 8.099
681 1904.2 8.195 1904.2 7.871


STATIC ANALYSIS
kN mm kN mm
691 1696.4 7.931 1696.4 7.642

701 1491.3 7.668 1491.3 7.414
712 1280.4 7.381 1280.4 7.163
724 1068.8 7.072 1068.8 6.890
737 861.3 6.740 861.3 6.593
750 676.4 6.412 676.4 6.296
764 502.5 6.063 502.5 5.977
778 354.9 5.718 354.9 5.658
792 233.6 5.378 233.6 5.338
806 138.4 5.042 138.4 5.019
820 69.5 4.711 69.5 4.700
834 26.9 4.385 26.9 4.380
849 10.3 4.040 10.3 4.038

TH ND: 2) The Results Are Related To The Test Performed at Location Shown by Client

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TH ND: 2) The Results Are Related To The Test Performed at Location Shown by Client

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED CORRIDOR BY INTEGRATING

EJIPURA MAINROAD/INNER RING ROAD JUNCTION, SONY WORLD

MAIN CLIENT : Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

CONSULTANT : Infra Support Engg. Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

CONTRACTOR : M/s. Simplex Infrastructure Ltd.

TEST AGENCY : M/s. GEO DYNAMICS

PROJECT NO. : PDA-F155-01

DATE : August 6, 2018

2. PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

4. PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

TABLE 1 : SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

TABLE 2 : SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

APPENDIX A : CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR PILE NO. P22-2

CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED CORRIDOR BY INTEGRATING EJIPURA MAINROAD/INNER

2.0 PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

Pile No. P22-2

Pile length below gages 8.49 m

Pile length below grade 8.29 m

Concrete Grade M35

Pile Diameter 1200mm

Hammer Weight 7.0 T

Drop Height 2.0 m

Working Load 520 T

Test Load 780 T

Soil Data Availability Not Available

3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT

4.0 PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

5.0 CAPWAP ANALYSIS

6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

6.1 Pile No. P22-2

2. The pile integrity is classified as acceptable.

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

Height Pile Capacity (Tons) Net Total

1. 0.5 320.3 50.3 0.0 4.0 --

2. 1.0 467.4 0.0 0.0 7.0 --

3. P22-2 1.5 488.3 0.0 2.0 11.0 --

4. 1.5 520.2 130.5 2.0 13.0 --

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

Pile Capacity 785.3 tons 1.5 x Design Load

Skin Friction 248.0 tons --

End Bearing 537.3 tons --

Set per blow 4.0 mm 3-4 mm

Total Displacement 13.0 mm --

Compressive Stress 18.3 N/mm2 0.85fck

Pile Integrity (80%-99% classified as

Avg. Shaft 620.2 299.24 79.37 0.455 0.995

Toe 5373.2 4750.94 0.114 5.901

Soil Model Parameters/Extensions Shaft Toe

Case Damping Factor 0.095 0.052

CAPWAP match quality = 5.14 (Wave Up Match) ; RSA = 0

Page 1 Analysis: 06-Aug-2018

Current CAPWAP Ru = 7853.9 (kN); Corresponding J(RP)= 0.26;

PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Toe Area 1.131 m2

Segmnt Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Compression Perim. Soil

1 1.06 11867.17 0.00 500.000 0.400 -0.000 0.000 3.770 0.00

Page 2 Analysis: 06-Aug-2018

7 7.43 11867.17 0.00 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000 3.770 10.00

Page 3 Analysis: 06-Aug-2018

SIMPLEX; Pile: P22-2; 1200MM; Blow: 5 (Test: 01-Aug-2018 16:10:) 06-Aug-2018

Load (kN) 1200

CAPWAP(R) 2006-2 Licensed to GEO DYNAMICS

SIMPLEX; Pile: P22-2 Test: 01-Aug-2018 16:10: