INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: RICHARD F. TALAMERA Name of Rater: MICHAEL M. YEE

Position: Teacher I Position: Head Teacher III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Deped Cavite Date of Review: March 2019
Rating Period: June 2018 to March 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied June 2018 Quality No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services Knowledge and knowledge of to March evidence was
Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
Pedagogy content within 2019 shown
of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
and across
integration within integration within integration within integration within integration within
curriculum
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
teaching areas.
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating
7.5% rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 of 6
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 3 lessons
4 lessons using lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was using MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown supported by any 1
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other given
of the other given given MOV given MOV MOV
Timeliness MOV
Basic Education 2. Used a range June 2018 Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated using 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services of teaching to March different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was different teaching
strategies that 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 a rating of 6
7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3 learner-
4 learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was centered lessons as
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as shown evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other supported by any 1
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV of the other MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV given
given given given
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a June 2018 Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services Knowledge and range of teaching to March teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to 2019 that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative thinking
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills skills and/or other
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS HOTS as shown in
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 with a rating
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 of 6
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 3 lessons
4 lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown MOV 1 and
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV supported by any 1
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other given
given MOV given MOV given MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable Used classroom 5 4 4.500 0.337
Services Environment classroom to March management management management management evidence was management
and Diversity of structure to 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
Learners engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
groups, in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with
meanigful with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 a rating of 7
exploration, 7.5%
Submitted at least
discovery and Efficiency 4 lessons Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 3 lessons
hands-on supported by MOV lessons supported lessons supported supported by any evidence was supported by MOV 1
activities within a 1 and any 1 of the by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any of the acceptable shown and any 1 of the
range of physical other acceptable 1 of the other 1 of the other MOV other acceptable
learning MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed June 2018 Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services learner behavior to March management management management management evidence was management
constructively by 2019 strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of shown strategies of learner
applying positive learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior behavior that
and non-violent that promote that promote that promote that promote promote positive
discipline to positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- and non-violent
ensure learning- violent discipline as violent discipline as violent discipline as violent discipline as discipline as shown
focused shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV in MOV submitted
environment submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a with a rating of 6
7.5% rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
4 of the given 4 of the given 4 of the given the given strategies evidence was of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson observed in 3
4 lessons lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used June 2018 Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Environment differentiated, to March differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was Applied differentiated
and Diversity of developmentally 2019 teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies shown teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner to address learner to address learner to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown in
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 of 6
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
interests and 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
7.5%
experiences. teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown teaching strategies
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as in at least 2 lessons
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the MOV 1 and
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV supported by any 1
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services and Planning managed and to March implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was implemented
implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and and learning process
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as as shown in MOV 1
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
varied teaching 7.5% 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown sequenced teaching
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and and learning process
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as as evidently shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given supported by any 1
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV of the other given
of the other given of the other given of the other given MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in June 2018 Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable Frequently 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services and Planning collegial to March participated in participated in
participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was participated in
discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin
LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown LACs/FGDs/meeting
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to teacher/learner s to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner
discuss feedback to enrich teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
teacher/learner instruction as feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction asfeedback to enrich shown in the MOV instruction as shown
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
instruction as submitted in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted
Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated in 3
least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was LACs/FGDs/meeting
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown s as evidently shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the given
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, June 2018 Quality Developed and Developed and used Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and used 5 4 4.500 0.337
Services developed, to March used varied varied teaching and used varied used varied evidence was varied teaching and
organized and 2019 teaching and learning resources, teaching and teaching and shown learning resources,
including ICT, to
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, including ICT, to
address learning
teaching and including ICT, to goals as shown in including ICT, to including ICT, to address learning
learning address learning MOV 1 with a rating address learning address learning goals as shown in
resources, goals as shown in of 6 goals as shown in goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a of 7
address learning rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
goals.
7.5% Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable Submitted 3 varied
Submitted at least teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was teaching and
4 varied teaching learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown learning resources,
and learning including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the MOV 1 and
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV supported by any 1
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June 2018 Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable Designed, selected, 4 4 4 0.3
Services and Reporting selected, to March selected, organized selected, organized selected, organized selected, organized evidence was organized and used
organized and 2019 and used and used and used and used shown diagnostic, formative
used diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, and summative
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and assessment
summative summative summative summative summative strategies consistent
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment with curriculum
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies requirements as
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with shown in MOV 1 with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum a rating of 6
requirements. 7.5% requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3 varied
4 varied assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was assessment tools as
assessment tools as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown evidently shown in
as evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the any 1 of the
in any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored June 2018 Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable Consistently 5 5 4 4.667 0.350
Services and evaluated to March monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was monitored and
learner progress 2019 evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown evaluated learner
and achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement progress and
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV data as shown in the
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was combination of at
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown least 4 of the
acceptable MOV MOV MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 3 quarters
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica June 2018 Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Frequently showed 4 4 4 4 0.3
Services and Reporting ted promptly and to March showed prompt prompt and clear showed prompt prompt and clear evidence was prompt and clear
clearly the 2019 and clear communication of and clear communication of shown communication of
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as guardians as shown
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV in the MOV
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted a

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was combination of 3 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 3 quarters
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Frequently 4 4 4.000 0.400
Services various related to March performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was performed various
works/activities 2019 related related related work/activities that shown related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV process as shown in
10%
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 3 different
4 different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was kinds of acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL Very Satisfactory 4.124
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory RICHARD F. TALAMERA MICHAEL M. YEE ELEUTERIA M. PASIOLAN, Ed.D.
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory Teacher I Head Teacher III Public Schools Division Supervisor
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory Ratee Rater Concurrent OIC- Bulihan National High School
below 1.499 Poor Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)
Name of Employee: RICHARD F. TALAMERA Name of Rater: MICHAEL M. YEE
Position: TEACHER I Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd Cavite Date of Review: March.2019
Rating Period: June 2018- March 2019

Weight Numerical Ratings

Weight per
KRA Objectives per
KRA Q E T Ave
Objective
Objective 1 7.5% 4 4 4.000
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 4 7.5% 5 4 4.500
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4 4.000
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 9 7.5% 5 4 4.500
Objective 10 7.5% 4 4 4.000
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 5 4 4.667
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 4 4 4.000
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating

RICHARD F. TALAMERA MICHAEL M. YEE ELEUTERIA M. PASIOLAN,

Teacher I Head Teacher III Public Schools Division Super
Ratee Rater Concurrent OIC- Bulihan National Hig
Approving Authority
MMARY SHEET

HAEL M. YEE
D TEACHER III
h.2019

Score
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.337
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.337
0.300
0.350
0.300
0.400
Very Satisfactory
4.124

ELEUTERIA M. PASIOLAN, Ed.D.

 Public Schools Division Supervisor
oncurrent OIC- Bulihan National High School
Approving Authority