Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In a
prospective study of 490 cases of SCD in children and young adults, 40 percent were
unexplained [6].
Causes of SCA/SCD vary somewhat by age [8]. In young children (<2 years old),
CHD is a major cause, while primary arrhythmia and myocarditis are less common. In
adolescents and young adults, primary arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis
are more common and CHD is a less common cause of SCA/SCD. Premature
atherosclerotic coronary artery disease is an uncommon cause of SCA/SCD in
patients <25 years old. However, children and adolescents can have coronary disease
from Kawasaki disease or anomalous origin of the coronary arteries, which may cause
SCD. (See "Cardiovascular sequelae of Kawasaki disease: Management and
prognosis"and "Congenital and pediatric coronary artery abnormalities".)
The etiology of SCA/SCD in young competitive athletes may differ somewhat from
the general population. This is discussed separately. (See "Athletes: Overview of
sudden cardiac death risk and sport participation", section on 'Etiology of sudden
death'.)
WARNING SIGNS
Symptoms — Although SCA/SCD is often the initial presenting event, retrospective
studies have shown that warning signs or symptoms (eg, chest pain, fatigue,
and syncope/lightheadedness) were noted by one-quarter to more than one-half of
affected individuals prior to SCA/SCD [13-15]. The most common symptoms were
chest pain and syncope/presyncope. Other symptoms included dizziness, palpitations,
or dyspnea. It is important to note that these studies did not include matched controls,
and that these symptoms are also prevalent in the general population. In addition,
many patients (25 to 61 percent) had a family history of premature unexpected death
in other family members [14,15].
ECG findings that warrant further evaluation (which, depending on the finding, may
include review of the history and physical examination, echocardiography,
ambulatory ECG monitoring, exercise stress test, cardiac magnetic resonance
imaging, and/or or genetic testing) include the following [16]:
Observational data and simulation model studies suggest that the most cost-effective
initial screening for children and adolescents for cardiac disease is a detailed history
and physical examination alone. The addition of ECG does not appear to be cost-
effective as a screening test. (See 'Method of screening' below.)
In newborns, there is evidence that universal screening with pulse oximetry during the
birth hospitalization is effective for detecting critical congenital heart disease. This is
discussed in greater detail separately. (See "Newborn screening for critical congenital
heart disease using pulse oximetry".)
Routine health care visits — We suggest all children have regular cardiovascular
assessments performed throughout childhood during routine health care visits [18].
We prefer universal screening rather than a selective screening approach based on
preparticipation sports assessment, since many children do not participate in
organized sports and would be omitted in a selective approach.
The assessment includes reviewing the history (including family history) and a
detailed cardiovascular exam. Important aspects of the history and physical
examination may change over time in children at risk for SCA. For example, the
family history may evolve (ie, a new family member may be affected) and symptoms
of some cardiac conditions (eg, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) may not present until
adolescence.
Retrospective studies have shown that many children who experience SCA have
prodromal warning signs and symptoms and/or have a family history of sudden
and unexpected death of a family member before the age of 50 years.
(See 'Warning signs' above.)
The physical examination includes measurement of blood pressure and resting heart
rate, and cardiac auscultation to assess rate and rhythm of the heart and detect
murmurs and other abnormal heart sounds. Physical findings suggestive of underlying
cardiac disease include tachycardia, elevated blood pressure, and abnormal heart
examination (eg, heart murmur), which are discussed in detail elsewhere.
(See "Suspected heart disease in infants and children: Criteria for referral", section on
'Physical examination findings'.)
Universal versus selective screening — The incidence of SCA and SCD is low in
the general pediatric population, and it is challenging to demonstrate the effectiveness
of a universal screening program. Universal screening is costly, and in-depth
screening can provoke considerable anxiety for patients and families without clear
benefit. As a result, screening has focused on select populations who are deemed to be
at risk, such as competitive athletes. However, even in this selected group, the
incidence of SCA is low, and the impact of screening for SCA and the optimal
approach remain uncertain, as evidence is conflicted and limited. This issue is
discussed in detail separately. (See "Screening to prevent sudden cardiac death in
athletes".)
Age of screening — Effective screening to detect children at risk for SCA would
likely require repeat testing throughout childhood since the causes of SCA and their
clinical manifestations vary during childhood. For example, early screening for
primary electrical conduction defects (eg, long QT syndrome) might need to be
performed within the first year of life to detect affected infants and young children at
risk for SCD. In contrast, clinical manifestations of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are
not commonly observed until adolescence, and screening for this entity might not be
effective before 12 years of age. (See 'Etiology' above and "Hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and evaluation", section on
'Screening of first-degree relatives'.)
In a study of 7764 nonathletes and 4081 athletes between 14 and 35 years of age,
ECG screening results were categorized as normal, benign findings consistent with
training (Group 1; including sinus bradycardia, first-degree atrioventricular block,
incomplete right bundle-branch block, early repolarization, and voltage criteria for left
ventricular hypertrophy), and potentially pathologic findings (Group 2; including T
wave inversion, ST-segment depression, pathological Q waves, left or right atrial
enlargement, left- or right-axis deviation, right ventricular hypertrophy, ventricular
pre-excitation, right bundle-branch block, left bundle-branch block, long QTc, short
QTc, and Brugada-like pattern) [26]. Although Group 1 changes were more frequent
in athletes, they were also fairly common in nonathletes (87 and 49 percent,
respectively). Group 2 findings were common in both athletes and nonathletes (33 and
22 percent, respectively). Echocardiographic evaluation of all 784 nonathletes with
Group 2 findings was normal in 84 percent of patients. Only 2 percent (n = 16) of
these patients had findings consistent with a morphologically mild cardiomyopathy,
and the remaining had incidental findings that would not affect management.
In another study of >11,000 adolescent athletes (95 percent males) who underwent
comprehensive cardiac screening (including a health questionnaire, physical
examination, ECG, and echocardiography), 0.38 percent were found to have disorders
associated with SCD and 2 percent were found to have congenital or valvular
abnormalities [27]. After screening, SCD occurred in eight athletes after a mean
interval of 6.8 years, for an incidence of approximately 6.8 per 100,000 person-years.
Six of the eight athletes who suffered SCD had had normal screening results.
Because randomized trials are not feasible due the low prevalence rate of pediatric
SCA, studies using simulation modeling analysis have estimated the cost-benefits of
different screening approaches in children based on assumptions regarding the age at
screening, false-positive and false-negative rates, and costs of additional testing and
treatment, if appropriate [28,29]. These studies have demonstrated a high cost to
relative health benefit and based on these analyses, the addition of ECG does not
appear to be cost-effective.
●For patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction
<30 percent despite maximal medical therapy, placement of an implantable
cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may be considered. This is discussed separately.
(See "Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure and
cardiomyopathy", section on 'Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy'.)
●For patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with high-risk features, ICD
placement may be considered. This is discussed separately. (See "Hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy in children: Management and prognosis", section on 'ICD
therapy'.)
●For patients with certain arrhythmia syndromes (eg, long QT syndrome,
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia), beta blockers may be
used for prevention of SCD as discussed in separate topic reviews.
(See "Congenital long QT syndrome: Treatment", section on 'Beta
blockers' and "Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia", section
on 'Beta blockers'.)
Poor outcome is related to prolonged periods without cardiac output, in part because
effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not performed. In the previously discussed
study from the state of Washington, improved survival rate for children and young
adults who suffered SCA was attributed in part to the publication of new resuscitative
guidelines in 2005 and the presence of robust community-based emergency medical
services (EMS) [8]. In this study, the survival rate rose from 25 to 58 percent after the
initiation of a single shock without rhythm reanalysis.
Both the AHA and AAP support efforts to improve survival by early symptom
recognition, the use of 911 EMS, effective bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation
(CPR), and deployment and use of AEDs in the community [18,20]. In particular,
developing and implementing CPR-AED programs within schools has saved the lives
of both students and adults who have had SCA in the school setting [30].
(See "Prognosis and outcomes following sudden cardiac arrest in adults", section on
'Bystander CPR' and "Automated external defibrillators", section on 'AED allocation
strategy'.)
The decision to obtain genetic testing is based on initial test results, family history,
and the discretion of the treating cardiologist. First-degree relatives, including siblings
and parents, should also be assessed. The studies that are done on the first-degree
relatives will depend upon the diagnosis of the affected individual.
If a cardiac anatomic explanation for the SCD episode is not found (ie, autopsy-
negative sudden unexplained death), evaluation should include family screening. It's
reasonable to also perform genetic testing; however, in the absence of an overt
phenotype, genetic testing is typically negative.
A genetic counselor is a key individual in helping the family deal with the
complicated issues surrounding the unexpected death of the child and obtaining an
accurate family pedigree that will aid in the diagnosis of the underlying cardiac
defect.
REFERENCES