Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mohamed A. Al-Farsi*
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Food Research Centre, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
(Received 27 December 2000; Accepted in revised form 9 June 2002)
Summary This study was initiated to utilize a variety of low quality dates (Qish-Habash) so that high
quality syrup could be produced by modifying the clarification process of the date juice.
Five different clarification treatments were used: (1) filtration, (2) hot liming and filtration,
(3) cold liming and filtration, (4) powder-activated carbon and filtration, and (5) granular-
activated carbon and filtration. The sugar content, total soluble solids, total ash, pH,
colour and purity were analysed to determine the clarification effects. The clarified juices
produced by these treatments were evaporated under constant conditions to produce date
syrup. Filtration, and activated carbon and filtration were the most successful treatments
for the clarification of the date juice. Filtration gave the highest improvement in syrup
purity (97.7%), due to the reduction of total ash by 19.5% and colour by 44.6%. Activated
carbon removed the juice colour to give the lowest amount (60% in powder form and 57%
in granular form), as well as reducing total ash, which led to an improved syrup purity,
92.2% in powder form and 91.4% in granular form. Liming clarification had undesirable
effects, by increasing the total ash (15% in hot and 17% in cold lime), and increasing the
colouring matter produced by decomposition.
Keywords Activated carbon, filtration, liming, syrup.
International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2003, 38, 241–245 Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Clarification of date juice M. A. Al-Farsi 243
Dates
80–75% TSS
Size
reduction
0.5–1 cm thickness
Date juice
extraction
60 ˚C for 20 min
Coarse
filtration
50 µm filter paper
Fine
filtration
3 µm filter paper
Evaporation
70 ˚C under 500–600 mm Hg
Figure 1 Experiment flow diagram (TSS: total soluble solids; TS: total solids).
Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2003, 38, 241–245
244 Clarification of date juice M. A. Al-Farsi
Raw juice 0.41 ± 0.05 6.64 ± 0.4 18.60 ± 0.5 20.5 ± 0.5 6.13 ± 0.05 90.7 ± 0.5
Filtration 0.33 ± 0.05 3.68 ± 0.2 16.70 ± 0.5 17.5 ± 0.5 6.22 ± 0.05 95.4 ± 0.5
Filtration and hot liming 0.47 ± 0.05 5.70 ± 0.4 13.70 ± 0.5 18.0 ± 0.5 7.56 ± 0.04 76.1 ± 0.5
Filtration and cold liming 0.48 ± 0.05 4.36 ± 0.4 13.77 ± 0.4 16.5 ± 0.5 7.53 ± 0.05 83.4 ± 0.5
Filtration and PAC 0.38 ± 0.05 4.70 ± 0.4 16.50 ± 0.4 17.9 ± 0.5 6.14 ± 0.05 92.2 ± 0.5
Filtration and GAC 0.41 ± 0.05 2.84 ± 0.2 15.30 ± 0.5 18.5 ± 0.5 5.32 ± 0.05 82.7 ± 0.5
TSS, total soluble solids; PAC, powder-activated carbon; GAC, granular-activated carbon; IU, international units.
Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. of three determinations.
Table 2 The developed date syrup in comparison with others produced in Iraq
Treatments (%) Filtration HL-F CL-F PAC-F GAC-F Factory made Cottage made
TSS 69.3 ± 0.5 69.0 ± 0.4 69.0 ± 0.3 69.1 ± 0.5 69.0 ± 0.5 72.4 74.3
Glucose 34.5 ± 0.2 26.9 ± 0.5 30.5 ± 0.3 32.2 ± 0.5 31.1 ± 0.4 35.5 29.7
Fructose 33.2 ± 0.4 29.1 ± 0.4 29.6 ± 0.5 31.5 ± 0.3 32.0 ± 0.4 27.9 23.9
Purity 97.7 ± 0.5 81.2 ± 0.4 87.1 ± 0.5 92.2 ± 0.5 91.4 ± 0.5 88.7 75.1
*Data were obtained from Barreveld (1993). TSS, total soluble solids; HL-F, hot liming and filtration; CL-F, cold liming and
filtration; PAC-F, powder-activated carbon and filtration; GAC-F, granular-activated carbon and filtration.
Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. of three determinations.
treatment recovered the highest content of sugar pares well with syrup produced from high quality
from the date juice, followed by activated carbon. dates, by using filtration and activated carbon and
The decrease in sugar content by the liming filtration treatments. In the future, taste and
process is caused by the destruction of sugars by aroma-active components, and sensory attributes
alkalinity and the high temperature (Davidek will be examined to compare the differences in
et al., 1990). both low and high quality date syrups.
For the development of purity by clarification
treatments, filtration gave the highest improve-
References
ment in juice purity (95.4%), due to a reduction
of total ash to 0.33% and colour to 3.7, followed Barreveld, W.H. (1993). Date palm products. In: Agricul-
by powder-activated carbon and filtration treat- tural Services Bulletin. Pp. 33–40, 139. Rome, Italy: Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
ments. Benyamin, N.D. (1993). Date processing industrialisation
After the clarification treatments, the clarified and training activities. In: FAO Project Report. Pp. 1–2.
juices were evaporated to produce date syrup. Muscat, Oman: United Nations Development Pro-
Table 2 shows a comparison of the date syrup grammes.
developed by this study and others produced in Davidek, J., Velisek, J. & Pokorny, J. (1990). Chemical
Changes During Food Processing. Pp. 90–91. Amsterdam:
Iraq. It is indicated that the clarification treat- Elsevier.
ments developed are able to remove undesirable De Whalley, H.C. (1964). Methods of Sugar Analysis.
matter (pigments and fibres) and maintain high International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar
sugar recovery, which leads to improved purity of Analysis. Pp. 36–59. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
the date syrup to 97.7 and 91.4% for filtration and Kirk, R.S. & Sawyer, R. (1991). Pearson’s Composition and
Analysis of Foods. Pp. 200–202. New York: Longman
granular activated carbon and filtration, respect- Scientific & Technical.
ively, compared with other date syrup (88.7%). Mathlouthi, M. & Reiser, P. (1995). Sucrose Properties and
In conclusion, it is possible to produce high- Applications. Pp. 179–180. Glasgow: Blackie Academic
grade syrup from low quality dates, which com- and Professional.
International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2003, 38, 241–245 Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Clarification of date juice M. A. Al-Farsi 245
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (2000). Quantitative Nancy, H. & Smith, P. (1983). Cane sugar technology. In:
analysis of the dates available in the Sultanate of Oman in Proceedings of the 1982 Sugar Processing Research
1999. In: Agricultural and Fisheries Research Bulletin, Vol. Conference. Pp. 11–15. New Orland: Agriculture
1. Pp. 39–43. Muscat, Oman: Ministry of Agriculture and Research Services, United States Department of Agricul-
Fisheries. ture.
Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2003, 38, 241–245