Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sasser
IM-6/12AP
1 May 2019
The horror film ‘Split’ is the perfect example of false portrayals of mental illness in film.
The movie illustrates a character with Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) who terrorizes other
people, but those who actually experience this disorder do not present any risk of violence more
than the rest of the population. In fact, less than 4% of the individuals receiving treatment for
DID were charged with a criminal offense (“ISSTD Statement on the Movie ‘Split.’”). However,
this is not the only instance in which movies portrayed mental illnesses incorrectly. There are
various other films, news coverage, and TV shows that harm individuals suffering from mental
illnesses, such as ‘Tiny Toons Adventures’ and ‘Beauty and the Beast’, which will be discussed
further in this paper. In an attempt to boost their ratings and increase the amount of viewers,
movies and TV shows portray individuals with mental illnesses negatively and often incorrectly.
The false portrayal of mental illnesses creates stereotypes and demeaning language to describe
those with mental illnesses. There are numerous ways to combat these negative stereotypes
through strategies to eliminate stigma, future research, and networks that portray them
incorrectly. Media has the ability to create false perceptions about mental illnesses, generating a Commented [1]: intro
stigma against them, but public health campaigns can combat the stigma surrounding mental
Sources of media such as newspaper articles and television shows are extremely popular
among the general public to see entertainment and receive information from. One piece of
Shin 2
information that the media teaches their audiences is that individuals with mental illnesses are
dangerous or violent. The portrayal of these individuals in the media and different forms of
entertainment is more often negative than positive, due to the influence and hasty efforts of news
Mass media is the most influential source that disperses information about mental
illnesses for “those without personal exposure to mental illness, learn and come into contact with
issues surrounding health” (Chen 1). However, for the articles that explore the topic of mental
health, more than 50% of them were “negative in tone” (Chen 1). In addition to newspapers,
television is also a popular source for the general public to receive more information about the
topic of individuals with mental illnesses, a common theme in TV programs. In the US, ⅕th of
prime television programs depict some aspect of mental illnesses (Stuart 1). The coverage of
mental illnesses in the media and entertainment provide help for young people experiencing
mental distress (Henderson 1). Television helps influence people’s beliefs, and the wrong
message can create false judgements among those who do experience mental health conditions
Overgeneralizing the symptoms of the individuals with mental illnesses further condemns
these illnesses. When newspaper articles cover a certain mental illness, they perpetuate the idea
that those associated with the illness are “dangerous” (Wahl 2) or are “dangerous time bombs
waiting to explode” (“Stigma” 1). According to a study conducted by Wahl, “Of all [news]
stories, 26% involved accounts of crimes and/or violence perpetuated by a person with a mental
illness” (2). A similar idea occurs in TV programs; a majority of the “characters with a mental
illness hurt or kill others” (Granello 1). This popular portrayal of characters is entirely false;
“92% of people with mental health problems show no indication of ever being violent” (Granello
Shin 3
1). Not only does this stigmatize the illness, but it also affects the audience. This incorrect
depiction is concerning because television shows have become an important and prevalent aspect
of American life. Those who read an article about the dangerousness of mental illness have a
greater tendency to view those with mental illness as dangerous, anxiety provoking, and in need
of restriction (Wahl 3). Also, the most stereotypical characteristics are used to describe these
characters, isolating them from the rest of society, creating an idea in the audience that mentally
ill people are not normal and cannot function properly. Commented [5]: subidea 2 for control 1
The networks’ determination to garner more views contributes to the idea of negative
angles, lighting, and inharmonious music to appeal to the audience’s fear (Henderson 1). When
TV program creators decide to introduce a mentally ill character, they often skip over the
complexities of the illness a character might be dealing with, and instead, describe the character
using derogatory words such as “insane, mental, crazed, deranged, nut” (Frankham 1). For
example, in the animated cartoon ‘Tiny Toons Adventures’, a group of “evil villains” were
labeled as “twisted, sick or nuts”, greatly stereotyping these characters by indicating that they
were unable to control themselves. However, producers typically believe that “they won’t be
able to please everyone who has that condition” (Henderson 1), allowing them to get away with
only providing a brief generalization that fuels the common misconceptions about the illness.
There is a disconnect between the producers of a show who want to attract the most viewers, and
individuals who genuinely experience the illness, generating false information and incorrectly
These generalizations affect the mindset that many people carry about the behavior of
individuals with mental illnesses. The portrayal of these individuals suffering from mental
Shin 4
illnesses in the media and different forms of entertainment is more often negative than positive,
stemming from a lack of knowledge, which can be alleviated with proper research. Commented [7]: conclusion for control 1
information available. When mental illnesses are shown as the factors that completely controls
the actions of those who suffer from them, audiences have an inclination to believe these
portrayals, due to a lack of other exposure. These portrayals influence the opinions of the
audience, forcing them to become closed-minded. Ultimately, this causes the public to stereotype
certain illnesses. This also contributes to both a public and internal shame against mental
The word stigma originates from labels that devalued individuals of lower stature from
the ancient Greek social structure. According to Arboleda-Flórez, the label that was placed on
individuals, sitzein, demoralized their values. However it was not utilized to characterize mental
character, because “[Greeks] believed that the mentally ill carried a connotation of shame and
weakness of character,” (Arboleda-Flórez 1) which has carried on to current times and is still
found in modern societies. Those with mental illnesses were perceived as unable to contribute to
the group’s survival and as threats to their well-being. These reasons were utilized to justify
Not only does the meaning of the word ‘stigma’ for centuries contribute to the
debilitating nature of the beliefs of mental illnesses, a misunderstanding of mental illnesses also
leads to public stigma, which represents the negative beliefs, attitudes, and the common
stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination against those suffering from a mental disorder
Shin 5
(Conner 1). Stigma comprises 5 different aspects: labeling, stereotyping, separation, status loss,
and discrimination (Conner 1). Labeling distinguishes human differences in appearance and
behavior. Stereotyping results from cultural attitudes/beliefs that connect human appearances,
conditions, and behaviors to negative stereotypes. Separation holds the same idea as isolation;
individuals with an unattractive quality or a condition are separated from the rest of society and
seen as undesirable. Those who experience status loss are looked down upon and are inferior to
those who don’t suffer from a label. This leads to discrimination, which is being treated
differently by others because of a label distinguishing human differences. Commented [10]: subidea 2 for control 2
In addition to facing public stigma and judgement from other members of society,
individuals with mental health issues may suffer from internalized stigma, which significantly
impairs their thinking (Conner 1). These people, upon hearing the reactions of those who
perceive mental illnesses, often believe that they are “responsible for their condition” (Conner 1).
This results in a feeling of self-worthlessness because they are part of a stigmatized group,
creating barriers to seek help. These feelings can be internalized within the family, and people do
not consider seeking professional mental health treatment. Self-stigma does not only affect their
thinking, but also their quality of life. Corrigan states that “people with mental illness are robbed
of the opportunities that define a quality life: good jobs, safe housing, satisfactory health care,
and affiliation with a diverse group of people”. Members of stigmatized groups often have less
access to educational opportunities, well-paying jobs, and adequate health care (“Stigma” 1).
This can worsen the stress that people with mental illnesses undergo. Stigma creates unnecessary
stress for those involved, affecting the lives of marginalized groups and preventing them from
seeking easily obtainable help. In addition, stigma tends to increase the likelihood of an
individual’s relapse. A mental disorder is not visible as physical handicaps are, so many people
Shin 6
with mental disorders experience “strain trying to conceal their condition from strangers or
People have been labeling and devaluing individuals who suffer from a mental illness for
one’s status, and discrimination, stigma damages the sensible reasoning of the individuals with
mental illness. In addition, these individuals resort to extreme measures to release their problems,
resulting in internalized stigma, significantly impairing not only their thinking, but also their
There are numerous ways to approach the abundance of false information that causes
stigmatizing attitudes. This can be accomplished by looking into TV networks and producers.
With the help of mental health professionals, implementing public health campaigns can help
create forms of entertainment that depict mental illnesses correctly. Commented [13]: intro for control 3
There are 3 strategies to eliminate stigma as a whole: protest, educate, and contact.
According to Conner, protesting can help reduce public stigma by replacing “negative
stereotypical representations of people living with mental illness with more accurate and
empathic ones” (1). “Groups protest inaccurate and hostile representations of mental illness as a
way to challenge the stigmas they represent,” (Corrigan 1). Educating the public is another
method that can be used to eliminate stigma. Public education campaigns fight against stigma by
replacing myths about mental illness with facts. Education helps the public make more informed
decisions about mental illness (Corrigan 1). Lastly, specifically contacting the institutions that
produce entertainment is effective. Directly contacting these institutions allows for different
groups to view issues in another perspective and connect with individuals as normal people.
There are two reasons to the main goal of challenging misrepresentations. They are for the media
Shin 7
to stop portraying inaccurate representations of mental illness and for the public to not believe
these negative views about mental illness (Corrigan 1). Commented [14]: subidea 1 for control 3
In order to reduce the exposure to stigmatizing phrases, researchers must recognize and
change the influences behind stigmatizing ideals among children. One major influence is the
popular Disney movie, ‘Beauty and the Beast’. In this movie, the protagonist, Belle, and her
father are portrayed as mentally ill, and hurtful words are used to isolate them, such as the father
being hauled away in a “lunacy wagon” (Lawson 3). Due to the importance this movie holds as
entertainment for children, the derogatory words could allow children to view mental illness as
being different in a negative and inferior way, and as those who are very frightening. In
Lawson’s article, she identifies a few suggestions for future researchers to uncover. First, the
behaviors of the mentally ill individuals in movies and TVs should be analyzed to determine
what factors that children may pick up on and use in the future. Next, researchers should analyze
the “emotional aspect of viewing content” (Lawson). In doing this, they would be able to utilize
the reactions of the characters on both sides of stigma. Then, researchers must identify a
relationship between children’s exposure to this type of material and how it contribute to the
attitudes and behaviors of children, and with this information, researchers should address
whether correlation does equal causation for the relationship between children’s tv watching time
and the tolerance towards mental illnesses. Commented [15]: subidea 2 for control 3
Tackling the issue of the false portrayals of mental illness would become the most
effective by protesting, educating, and contacting media outlets and TV stations, with the help of
professionals directly correlated to forms of media; journalists, and mental health counselors,
who can help create effective change. Journalists play an integral role in developing news stories,
many of which further the narrative that individuals with mental illnesses are far more dangerous
Shin 8
than they really are, so they would be an important part in the plan to reduce stigma. Before
reporting information, journalists should consult several different perspectives in the mental
health field and discover effective interventions that do not merely focus on medications and
hospitals (Wahl 6). In addition, journalists should report about positive stories about recovery
and achievement, instead of the stories the display the mentally ill as unable to improve. In
addition, mental health counselors play a huge role in fighting the stigma in the media. Working
alongside the media, counselor could provide more accurate information for the media to report.
Also, mental health counselors can write to TV stations, participate in public information
campaigns, encouraging the general public to do the same. Commented [16]: subidea 3 for control 3
By utilizing the 3 strategies to eliminate stigma, not only can researchers identify ways to
reduce the stigma among young people, but journalists and mental health counselors can also
utilize them actively. Protesting, educating, and contacting the media can help creat effective
change in helping educate the public. Commented [17]: conclusion for control 3
News coverage, movies, and TV shows portray mental illnesses negatively and
incorrectly, in a hasty attempt to boost their ratings and increase the amount of viewers. This
false portrayal of mental illnesses is due to pure ignorance, which creates stereotypes and allows
not only adults to use demeaning language to describe those with mental illnesses, but also
teaches them to young children. Because mental disorders cannot be seen, they are not perceived
as an issue of important value as physical disorders. This contributes to a public stigma against
common illnesses and influences their opinions, forcing them to become close-minded and place
labels. With sensitivity to the adjectives used, portrayals in the media and entertainment can get
rid of negative stereotypes and create a stigma-free environment. Commented [18]: conclusion
Shin 9
Works Cited
Arboleda-Flórez, Julio. “What causes stigma?” World psychiatry: official journal of the World
Chen, Marian and Stephen Lawrie. “Newspaper depictions of mental and physical health”
Conner, Kyaien O., et al. "Stigma: Impact on Mental Health and People of Color." People of
Health, and Immigration, edited by Kofi Lomotey, vol. 3: Health and Wellness,
Corrigan, Patrick W, and Amy C Watson. “Understanding the impact of stigma on people with
mental illness” World psychiatry: official journal of the World Psychiatric Association
Shin 10
Frankham, Emma. “Stigmatizing Media Portrayals: What Can We Do? | NAMI: National
Granello, Darcy Haag, and Pamela S. Pauley. “Television Viewing Habits and Their
Relationship
to Tolerance Toward People with Mental Illness.” Journal of Mental Health Counseling,
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=3312971&site=eds-live.
Henderson, Lesley. “Popular Television and Public Mental Health: Creating Media
Entertainment from Mental Distress.” Critical Public Health, vol. 28, no. 1, Jan. 2018, pp.
news.isst-d.org/isstd-statement-on-the-movie-split.
Lawson, Andrea, and Gregory Fouts. “Mental Illness in Disney Animated Films.” Canadian
Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie, vol. 49, no. 5, May 2004, pp.
"Stigma." The Gale Encyclopedia of Mental Health, edited by Laurie J. Fundukian and Jeffrey
Wilson, 2nd ed., vol. 2, Gale, 2008, pp. 1104-1108. Gale Virtual Reference Library,
http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX2699900408/GVRL?u=howard_main&sid=GVRL
&xid=d09837bf.
Stuart, Heather. “Media Portrayal of Mental Illness and Its Treatments: What Effect Does It
Have
Shin 11
on People with Mental Illness?” CNS Drugs, vol. 20, no. 2, 2006, pp. 99–106. PubMed,
doi:10.2165/00023210-200620020-00002.
Wahl, Otto F. “News Media Portrayal of Mental Illness: Implications for Public Policy.”
American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 46, no. 12, Aug. 2003, pp. 1594–600. SAGE
Journals, doi:10.1177/0002764203254615.