You are on page 1of 10

Republic of the Philippines

DepEd Region III – Central Luzon


Schools Division of Tarlac Province
San Julian Sta. Maria High School
Moncada, Tarlac

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


Name of Employee MARVIN Y. ARCE Name of Rater: MELBA M. CANGCO
Position TEACHER III Position: HEAD TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SAN JULIAN – STA. MARIA HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: APRIL 29, 2018
Rating Period: S.Y. 2018 - 2019

Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score


Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Showed Showed Showed Showed No  2 COT rating
knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of acceptable sheet about
content and its content and its content and its content and its evidence knowledge of
integration integration integration integration within was shown content and its
within and within and within and and integration within
Quality
across subject across subject across subject across subject and
areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown in across subject
in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a areas with an
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 average rating of
7.
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No  2 modified DLLs
least 4 lessons lessons using lessons using of the given MOV acceptable highlighting
1. Applied using MOV 1 MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidence integration of
1. Content knowledge of and supported supported by supported by was shown content
Basic June 2018
Knowledge content within by any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the knowledge within
Education
and and across
to March 7.50%
other given other given other given and across
5 2 2 3 0.225
Services 2019
Pedagogy curriculum MOV MOV MOV subject area.
teaching areas.  Instructional
materials
highlighting
Efficiency
mastery of
content and its
integration in
other subject
areas
 Performance
tasks and test
materials
highlighting
integration of
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
content
knowledge within
and across
subject area.
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No
 COT rating sheet
were distributed were distributed were distributed were distributed acceptable
Timeliness came from 1st and
across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1 quarter evidence
2nd quarter
quarters quarters quarters was shown
Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
different different different different teaching acceptable  2 COT rating
teaching teaching teaching strategies that evidence sheet about
strategies that strategies that strategies that promote was shown teaching
promote promote promote reading, writing strategies that
Quality reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing and/or numeracy promote reading,
and/or and/or and/or skills as shown in writing and/or
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills MOV 1 with a numeracy skills
as shown in as shown in as shown in rating of 4 with an average
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating of 7.
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No  2 modified DLLs
least 4 learner- least 4 learner- least 4 learner- least 4 learner- acceptable highlighting using
centered centered centered centered lessons evidence different teaching
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidently was shown strategies that
2. Used a range of
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown shown in MOV 1 promote reading,
teaching
1. Content in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and and supported by writing and/or
Basic strategies that June 2018
Knowledge supported by supported by supported by any 1 of the other numeracy skills.
Education
and
enhance learner to March 7.50%
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV given  Instructional
5 2 3.5 0.263
Services achievement in 2019
Pedagogy other MOV other MOV other MOV materials
literacy and
given given given highlighting using
numeracy skills.
different teaching
strategies that
Efficiency
promote reading,
writing and/or
numeracy skills
 Performance
tasks and test
materials
highlighting using
different teaching
strategies that
promote reading,
writing and/or
numeracy skills
Timeliness
1. Content 3. Applied a range Used different Used different Used different Used different No  2 COT rating
Knowledge of teaching
7.50% Quality
teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable sheet about
5 2 3.5 0.263
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
and strategies to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence different teaching
Pedagogy develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical was shown strategies that
and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative develop critical
thinking, as well as thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or and creative
other higher- other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as thinking and/or
order thinking shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV other HOTS with
skills. with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of 1 with a rating an average rating
7 6 5 of 4 of 7.
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No  2 modified DLLs
least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable highlighting
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any evidence different teaching
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1of the given was shown strategies that
supported by supported by supported by MOV develop critical
any1ofthe other any1 of the any 1of the and creative
given MOV other given other given thinking and/or
MOV MOV other HOTS
 Instructional
Basic June 2018
materials
Education to March
highlighting
Services 2019
different teaching
strategies that
Efficiency develop critical
and creative
thinking and/or
other HOTS
 Performance
tasks and test
materials
highlighting
different teaching
strategies that
develop critical
and creative
thinking and/or
other HOTS
Timeliness
4. Managed Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No  2 COT rating sheet
classroom management management management management acceptable about managing
2. Learning structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence classroom
Basic Environment engage learners, June 2018 engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners was shown structure that
Education and individually or in to March 7.50% Quality in in in in engages learners 5 2 3.5 0.263
Services Diversity of groups, in 2019 activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks in various
Learners meaningful as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in activities/tasks
exploration, MOV 1 with a MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1with a with an average
discovery and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 rating of 7.
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
hands-on Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No  2 modified DLLs
activities within a least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson supported acceptable highlighting
range of physical supported by supported by evidenced by by any of the evidence various classroom
learning MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and acceptable was shown management
environments. 1 of the other 1 of the other supported by MOV strategies that
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV any 1of the engage learners in
other given activities/tasks
MOV  Instructional
materials various
highlighting
classroom
management
Efficiency
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks
 Performance
tasks and test
materials
highlighting
various classroom
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks
Timeliness
5. Managed Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher No
 2 COT rating sheet
learner behavior management management management management acceptable
about teacher
constructively by strategies of strategies that strategies of strategies of evidence
management
applying positive learner behavior engage learners learner behavior learner behavior was shown
strategies of
and non-violent that promote in that promote that promote
learner behavior
discipline to Quality positive and activities/tasks positive and positive and
that promote
ensure learning- non-violent as shown in non-violent non-violent
positive and non-
focused discipline as MOV1witha discipline as discipline as
2. Learning violent discipline
environments. shown in MOV rating of 6 shown in MOV shown in MOV
Basic Environment June 2018 with an average
submitted with submitted with submitted with a
Education and to March 7.50%
a rating of 7 a rating of 5 rating of 4
rating of 7. 5 2 3.5 0.263
Services Diversity of 2019
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No  Providing
Learners
least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the of the given acceptable motivation is
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as evidence evident as shown
as observed in as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only was shown inter-rater
Efficiency at least 4 lessons lessons 1 lesson agreement form.
lessons  Praising learners
is evident as
shown inter-rater
agreement form
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
 Setting house
rules and
guidelines is
evident as shown
inter-rater
agreement form
 Encouraging to
ask questions is
evident as shown
inter-rater
agreement form
Timeliness
6. Used Applied Applied Applied Applied No  2 COT rating sheet
differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable about
developmentally teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence differentiated
appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown teaching
learning Quality address learner address learner address learner address learner strategies to
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as address learner
address learners’ shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV diversity with an
gender, needs, with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of 1 with a rating average rating of
strengths, 7 6 5 of 4 7.
interests and Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No  2 modified DLLs
experiences. least 4 differentiated differentiated at least 4 lessons acceptable highlighting (1)
differentiated teaching teaching as observed in 3 evidence differentiation in
teaching strategies in at strategies in 2 lessons as was shown content and (2)
2. Learning strategies in at least 2 lessons lessons as observed in 2 product process
Basic Environment June 2018 least 2 lessons as evidenced by evidenced by lessons observed which takes into
Education and to March 7.50% as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and in only 1 lesson consideration the 5 5 5 0.375
Services Diversity of 2019 MOV 1 and supported by supported by differentiated strength and
Learners supported by any1ofthe other any1ofthe other teaching strategy weaknesses of the
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV in only 1 lesson as learners.
Efficiency other evidently shown  3 Instructional
acceptable MOV in any 1 of the materials
acceptable MOV highlighting
differentiation of
content and
product process
which takes into
consideration the
strength and
weaknesses of the
learners.
Timeliness
Basic 7. Planned, June 2018 Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No  2 COT rating sheet
3.
Education
Curriculum
managed and to March 7.50% Quality implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable about 5 5 5 0.375
Services implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
and developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence sequenced
Planning sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and was shown teaching and
teaching and learning process learning process learning process learning learning process
learning processes as shown in as shown in as shown in process as shown with an average
to meet MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a rating of 7.
curriculum rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No  Modified DLLs
varied teaching least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable highlighting 2
contexts. developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence developmentally
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and was shown sequenced
teaching and learning process learning process learning teaching and
learning process as evidently as evidently process as learning process
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidently shown  Instructional
shown in MOV 1 and supported and supported in any 1 of the materials
and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the given MOV highlighting 2
by any 1 of the other given other given developmentally
other given MOV MOV sequenced
MOV teaching and
learning process
Timeliness
Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No  Personal notes of
participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptable teachers of
LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ evidence LACs/FGDs/
meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to was shown meetings with
discuss discuss discuss discuss proof of
teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner attendance
feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to  Minutes in
enrich enrich enrich enrich LAC/FGC sessions
Quality
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as on use of teacher
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the and learner
8. Participated in MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted feedback to
collegial
3. enrich teaching
Basic discussions that June 2018
Curriculum practice with
Education
and
use teacher and to March 7.50%
proof of 5 5 5 0.375
Services learner feedback 2019
Planning attendance.
to enrich teaching

practice.
Participated in Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No  Submitted 2
at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ in any acceptable Personal notes of
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as 1 of the given evidence teachers of
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown MOV was shown LACs/FGDs/
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the meetings with
Efficiency
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV proof of
given MOV attendance
 Submitted 2
Minutes in
LAC/FGC sessions
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
on use of teacher
and learner
feedback to
enrich teaching
practice with
proof of
attendance.

Timeliness
June 2018 Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No
 2 COT rating sheet
to March used varied used varied used varied used varied acceptable
about varied
2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence
teaching and
learning learning learning learning was shown
learning
resources, resources, resources, resources,
resources,
including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
including ICT, to
address learning address learning address learning address
9. Selected, address learning
goals as shown goals as shown goals as shown learning goals
developed, goals with an
in MOV1witha in MOV1witha in MOV 1 with a as shown in
organized and average rating of
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
3. used appropriate 7.
Basic rating of 4
Curriculum teaching and
Education 7.50% Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No  Submitted (2) 5 5 5 0.375
and learning
Services least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and acceptable teacher-made
Planning resources, teaching and and learning and learning learning resource, evidence activity sheets
including ICT, to
learning resources, resources, including ICT, was shown  Developed 2
address learning resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as as evidently PowerPoint
goals.
including ICT, as evidently shown evidently shown shown in any of presentation
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and the acceptable  Submitted a
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by MOV lesson exemplar
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the  Used video clips
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV during the
acceptable MOV demonstration
Timeliness
Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No
selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
10. Designed,
organized and organized and organized and organized and evidence
selected,  2 COT rating sheet
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, was shown
organized and about using
formative and formative and formative and formative and
used diagnostic, diagnostic,
4. summative summative summative summative
Basic formative and June 2018 formative and
Assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
Education
and
summative to March 7.50% Quality
strategies strategies strategies strategies
summative 5 5 5 0.375
Services assessment 2019 assessment
Reporting consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
strategies strategies with an
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
consistent with average rating of
requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
curriculum 7
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
requirements.
with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of
7 6 5
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No  Submitted DLLs
least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool acceptable highlighting 4
assessment assessment assessment as evidently evidence formative
Efficiency tools as tools as tools as shown in any of was shown assessment
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown the acceptable strategies that are
in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the MOV appropriately
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV used.
Timeliness
Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No
monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated acceptable
 Consistently
evaluated evaluated evaluated learner progress evidence
monitored and
learner progress learner progress learner progress and was shown
evaluated learner
and and and achievement
Quality progress and
achievement achievement achievement using learner
achievement
using learner using learner using learner attainment data
using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data as shown in the
attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No  Submitted 1
combination of combination of combination of acceptable MOV acceptable compilation of a
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the evidence learner’s written
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV was shown work with
summary of
results and with
11. Monitored signature of
4. and evaluated parents.
Basic June 2018 Efficiency
Assessment learner progress  Submitted 3
Education
and and achievement
to March 7.50%
summative 5 5 5 5 0.375
Services 2019
Reporting using learner assessment tools
attainment data. with TOS and
frequency of
errors with
identified least
mastered skills
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No  Submitted the
were distributed were distributed were distributed were distributed acceptable first quarter
across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1 quarter evidence compilation of
quarters quarters quarters was shown work of a
learner’s written
work with
Timeliness
summary of
results and with
signature of
parents.
 Submitted the 2nd,
3rd and 4th quarter
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
summative
assessment tools
with TOS and
frequency of
errors with
identified least
mastered skills
Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No
showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and clear acceptable
and clear and clear and clear communication of evidence  Consistently
communication communication communication the learners’ was shown showed prompt
of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ needs, progress and clear
needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress and communication of
and and and achievement to the learners’
achievement to achievement to achievement to key needs, progress
key key key stakeholders, and achievement
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, including to key
including including including parents/ stakeholders,
parents/ parents/ parents/ guardians as including parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as shown in the guardians
shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
12. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Communicated Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No  Submitted test
promptly and combination of combination of 3 combination of 2 of the given MOV acceptable result from 3
4. clearly the at least 4 of the of the of the evidence samples with
Basic June 2018 acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV was shown parents’ signature
Assessment learners’ needs,
Education to March 7.50%  Submitted 3 5 5 5 5 0.375
and progress and
Services 2019 report cards with
Reporting achievement to
key stakeholders, parent’s signature
including in all quarters
supported by
parents/guardians.
minutes of
meetings
 Submitted
communication
letters to parents
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No  Submitted 1st
were distributed were distributed were distributed were distributed acceptable quarter test result
across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1 quarter evidence from 3 samples
quarters quarters quarters was shown with parents’
signature
Timeliness
 Submitted 3
report cards with
parent’s signature
in all quarters
supported by
Performance Indicators Rating Ave Score
Weight
Very
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET Satisfactory Q E T
Objective (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
minutes of
meetings
 Submitted
communication
letters to parents
during the second
and third quarter
Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No  Submitted the
performed performed performed various related acceptable required numbers
various related various related various related work/activities evidence of MOVs to show
work/activities work/activities work/activities that contribute was shown the consistency of
that contribute that contribute that contribute to the teaching performing
Quality
to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching learning process various related
learning process learning process learning process as shown in the work/activities
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted that contribute to
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted the teaching
13. Performed learning process
various related
Basic June 2018 Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No  Submitted
5. Plus works/activities
Education to March 10.00% least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the acceptable acceptable Certificate of 5 5 5 5 0.500
Factor that contribute to
Services
the teaching-
2019 kinds of of acceptable of acceptable MOV evidence Recognition
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown  Submitted
learning process.
certificate of
training
Efficiency
 Submitted
Certificate of
Speakership
 Submitted proof
of
coordinatorship
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENT 4.402
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY

MELBA M. CANGCO MARVIN Y. ARCE WILLY Q. MAMARADLO


Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like