17 views

Uploaded by api-355682710

- nemo_yr1
- Air Rockets
- Cal116 First Order Differential Equations Models Mixing Problems and Dynamics of Falling Objects
- Sounding Rocket Gust Angle of Attack3.doc
- Fluid Machinery Introduction NPTEL
- drag and lift in olympic games
- Questions
- Aerodynamic Modeling & Simulation of Hgv
- The Leading Edge by Goro Tamai - Table of Contents
- Momentum
- v46-90
- Car Aerodynamics (Lecture) - New (2)
- Rockets Risk Assesment
- F4 Note
- (UAV) - Aircraft Design
- Untitled
- 0712.3520f
- Physics Advanced Subsidiary Level Definations
- ddw2
- CFX13_07_Physics2.ppt

You are on page 1of 11

By Rachel Rosenberg

Abstract

During the rocket lab, the physics honors class was launching rockets and predicting heights of

different types of rockets to see how high the rockets would shoot up. Many steps were involved

in this process such as measuring thrust of a rocket, measuring drag force of a rocket, using a

numerical model to predict the height of the rocket, and finally launching the rocket. At the end

of the lab, the results of the height of the rocket and the predicted height of the rocket were

compared.

Measured in M A B C

Actual 44 59 103

Introduction

The rocket lab was a way to summarize everything that has been learned all the way since the

beginning of the school year up until this point. The rocket lab gave a real life experience that

ties together all of the concepts that have been learned so far this year. This project explored all

the topics of kinematics, which is the study of motion and acceleration, and dynamics, which is

the study of how forces affect kinematics such as Newton’s laws, Kepler’s Law, and the law of

conservation of momentum. Impulse is the product of the average force on an object and the

time interval over which it acts, or FΔT. Momentum is the product of the object's mass, m, and

the object’s velocity, v. Momentum is abbreviated as P. Drag Force is the resistance force

caused by the motion of a body through a fluid, such as water or air. The drag coefficient is used

to quantify the drag or resistance of an object in the equation Fdrag = KV2 . During this lab, the

drag coefficient is represented by kd. All of these terms that were just defined will play a key role

in this lab.

The impulse momentum theorem was one of the tools used to predict how high the

rockets would go when they were launched. Since impulse is defined as the force acting on an

object multiplied by the time that force acts on an object, that turns out impulse is also equal to

the change in momentum that the object is experience. One can combine impulse and momentum

and derive and equation which leads to the impulse momentum theorem. That derivation is listed

below.

During this lab, numerical iteration was also used in order to predict the height of the

rockets when launched off. This was needed because the force from the engine changes in a

complicated way as a function of time. Also, air resistance changes as the rocket’s speed

changes. Therefore it’s not possible to create an equation that can be solved algebraically in

order to find the maximum height of a rocket. It must be done using numerical iteration. During

the entire beginning of the lab, air resistance is ignored because the math was very problems. But

since the rocket is moving at such high speeds, air resistance couldn't be ignored.To solve, the

flight was broken up into lots of very short time intervals. During this section, the assumption

was made that the rocket’s velocity is constant. Since the time intervals were very short, this

wouldn’t of been an issue

Thrust Analysis

During the thrust analysis section, a rocket engine was secured into a carton container

that was set on top cart that was placed on a track. Then the engine was connected to a bunch of

wires to set off the engine in order to calculate the thrust. Finally, with the thrust the type of

engine that was used in the cart was able to be calculated. The purpose of section of the rocket

lab was to find out how much thrust the engine puts out at each tenth of a second interval. The

thrust was going to be needed to predict how high the rocket would fly when set off. The

materials that was used for this lab was a container box that was used to hold the engine, a

specific type of engine that the type was unknown, a cart, a track, and a force sensor to measure

the amount of force the rocket engine set off.

The rocket engine was placed and taped inside the box which was placed onto the cart on the

track. The cart and box had to be held

down with straps because of how

powerful the engine blast was. The

force sensor was connected to the

computer which collected all of the

data. The computer recorded data every tenth of a second for seven seconds. The sensor used a

process called triggering to collect the data because the whole event happened too quickly for the

human eye to capture. Triggering was making the sensor start it self whenever it noticed a

change in force. When the force went below -.1N, the trigger would happen and the sensor

would start. Before the engine was set off, the force gauge had to be set to zero before recording

data. This means the number of force was set to zero so we could get the most accurate data. The

force gauge was set to zero because the track was on a slight tilt. The force data was recorded

with negative numbers instead of positive numbers. This was because the equipment that was

used (the digital force gauge) sees pulling forces as positive an pushing forces as negative. This

was a pushing force because the rocket engine was pushing on the box on top of the car.

To set off the engine, one couldn’t just use a lit match and hold it up to the end of the

battery. If this happened, a hand could of been burned because of how fast the sparks would

shoot out of the rocket engine. To start the engine, a battery was connected to an igniter wire

coated in phosphorus. This wire would flame up when an electrical current went through it. A

student would connect the end of the wire to the battery, and another student would connect the

opposite end of the wire to the batter.

Impulse is found by F x ΔT. Since the x axis was time the y axis was force, the impulse was

able to be calculated by finding and calculating the area underneath the thrust (force) vs time

graph. Since the graph had a very odd shape, to find the area one would place rectangles

under the graph at each data point. Then, one would find the area of each rectangle by

multiplying the height (force) by the width (time). After finding the area of each rectangle,

the areas were added to find the area under the graph, the impulse. The impulse that was

calculated was 3.89NS.

`In order to calculate what type of rocket that was used, we had to learn about the different types

of engines. Each type has a different each impulse. A type A engine has an impulse of 2.5NS, a

type Bhas 5.0NS, a type C has an impulse of 10 NS, a type D has an impulse of 20NS, and they

keep going down the alphabet with the impulse keeps doubling. For our purposes, we used an A,

B, or C engine. Because the impulse was 3.89NS, that was closest 5.0NS, a B rocket. Below is

the graph for the thrust of each different type of rocket engine.

During the Drag Force analysis, a rocket was placed in a wind tunnel which was used to

calculate the drag force of the rocket. The purpose of this section of the rocket lab was to

determine the drag coefficient of the rockets we would be launching off would be. A drag force

is a way to determine air resistance, which is why it’s an important thing to calculate since while

launching rockets air resistance would be used. The equation for drag force is FDrag = kv². This

means the force of air resistance on an object is proportional to the square of the velocity. The

drag force needs to be calculated because if we ignore air resistance and how fast the rocket

moves there won’t accurately predict how high it will go. Drag coefficient depends on the size

and shape of an object. An object with sharp corners have larger drag coefficients than the same

size object with smoother corners. Many modern cars are designed with smooth lines and

rounded corners in order to reduce air resistance by reducing the drag force. By reducing the

drag force on cars saves gas.

The materials that were used for this section of the lab was a wind tunnel that contained a

honeycomb structure and fan, a protractor to measure the angel the rocket flew to, a rocket, and a

string to hold the rocket. The honeycomb structure was needed because the air would be very

turbulent without it. If the rocket was too turbulent, it would be almost impossible to to get a

accurate view of the angel the rocket flies to.

To solve for the drag force, it is necessary to derive an equation to solve. That derivation is listed

below:

The mass of the rocket that was being used wad 43g, or 0.043kg. The angel of that was observed

when the wind was turned on was measured three times, then found the average to get the most

accurate results. The first angle was 38°, the second angle was 34°, and the third angle was 36°.

The average of all of the three trials was 36°, which was used in the equation for drag force. The

next step was to put in 36° in the equation Fd=mgtan𝚹 to solve for the drag force. One would

put in Fd= (0.0043)(9.8)tan(36) and got a drag force .306N. The next step was to take the drag

force and put it in the equation Fd= Kdv² to solve for the drag coefficient. The velocity of the

rocket was 32m/s. After putting everything into the equation, there was a drag coefficient

of 2.99 x 10⁻⁴NxS²/m².

The other degree measured that was collected were then put into the equation for

drag coefficient to see how it compared to the average one. When 38° was placed into the

for Fd and

eventually k d, a kd of 3.2x10⁻⁴NxS²/m² came out. When 34° was placed into the

two equations, a kd of 2.8x10⁻⁴NxS²/m² appeared. The average wasn’t going to be good

enough to report for accuracy, so one listed the final kd as 2.8x10⁻⁴＜kd＜3.2x10⁻⁴. One

significant figure wouldn’t of been valued because the results wouldn't be precise or

accurate.

The importance of the of the numerical flight model section was to be able to use

physics principles and equation to be able to solve, calculate, and predict how high the

rockets would go when they will be launched off. The entries in each column of the

spreadsheet with all of the data was able to be calculated by relating thrust, drag and net

force, velocity, and final height. Each different cell had a different equation that was used

to calculate each variable that it means.

To calculate the average thrust, the equation (Thr1 + Thr2)/2 (thrust 1 plus thrust

2) divided by 2) was used. That numbers that were put in for Thrust was the thrust

measured for each time. The value for Thr1 and Thr2 is the last thrust that was used and the

current one you are on. To calculate the drag force that was used is Fd=kd * v² (the drag

coefficient multiplied by velocity squared) The value of kd was always 3.0 x 10⁻⁴. The

value of v would always be the prior v final from the first column above the one that was

being worked on. The equation for the average net force was Thravg - mg - Fd. (thrust average

minus mass time gravity minus drag force).

Solving for net impulse was solved by the

equation Fnet * 𝚫T (net force time delta

time). In this equation T was always .1

seconds. The initial velocity of every tenth of

a second was the last rows final velocity. The

final velocity was calculated by the equation

Vi+Fnet * 𝚫T/m (velocity initial plus net

force times delta t divided by the mass.

Once the final velocity was collected, the

average velocity needed to be calculated in

order to find the final velocity. The equation

for average velocity is (vi+vf)/2 (velocity

initial plus velocity final divided by 2). Now

that the average velocity was founded, the

prediction of the final height could be

calculated. The equation for final height is

hi+vavg*𝚫T (height initial plus the velocity

average times delta t. The height initial is the

height final that was used in the previous

column and delta time was equal to .1S.

On excel, with the use of spreadsheets the maximum height was able to be predicted. Each

different cell was a different equation in order to solve for the variables that was needed to find

the maximum height. Once all the data was put in and the maximum height for each tenth of a

second was recorded. In order to see what the full maximum height of the rocket was, one had to

look through all of the max height for each specific second. Once the height that was the biggest

was founded, that would be the total max height of the rocket. One would know that they found

the right max if the numbers will

go up, then finally back down,

representing the rocket is falling

back down.

Engine Type Predicted height Predicted time

During this section of the lab report, it was vital to include air resistance in the equations when

solving for the predicted height. The air resistance pushes down on the rocket that slows down

the velocity, causing the rocket to eventually stop and fall back down. Without air resistance, the

rocket, according to our calculations, would go much higher. If air resistance was ignored, the

calculation for the predicted height of how high the rocket would go would be not accurate. Air

resistance is seen most effectively on rocker C. Air resistance made much more of a difference

with a C engine because with a C engine the rocket moves at a much higher speed than it does

with the less powerful engines. When working with air resistance in rocket C, the value for the

predicted height was 296m. (air resistance is the drag force which value is .0003) However,

when the air resistance was set to zero and drag force was put in as zero, the predicted height for

rocket C was 1325m at 12 seconds. (the spreadsheet could of kept going) This shows how much

of a change a height can be if air resistance is put in or not.

The spread sheets were able to estimate how many seconds will elapse between the time

the rocket engine burns out and the time that the rocket reaches its maximum height. To find this

value, the row with the thrust at zero (this means the rocket ran out of engine to burn) and the

row with the maximum height time value are subtracted from each other. In this case, when the

thrust went to zero the time was 2.0 seconds, and the maximum height was 6.8 seconds, so the

change in delay would be 4.8 seconds.

One final aspect that was important to keep in mind during this section was how during

the calculations, the mass changing was being ignored. It was set up that the mass was constant

through the entire spreadsheet. In reality, the mass was changing. The mass of the engine

changes as its fuel is expelled because the change in mass is being ignored, it will throw off the

predictions for final height and make it less accurate.

Flight Results

To prepare for the launch off, the rockets needed some modifications to make a safer process. A

process called wadding was used in order to protect the parachute from getting burned. Wadding

was a piece of a square material pressed into the rocket. Next, the selected rocket engine (A,B, or

C) was placed inside and an igniter was inside the small hole in the bottom of the engine. A

small plastic plug was also placed on the engine’s hole to prevent the igniter from falling out. In

order to actually launch the rocket, the igniter

wires was connected to a battery in order to

ignite the engine. The battery was connected

to an igniter wire coated in phosphorus. This

wire would flame up when an electrical

current went through it.When the rockets

were launch, there was three students standing

at different sides of the rocket. Each student

was 50m away. It was necessary to use three

students to collect data because rockets rarely

go straight up and therefore one person alone

would not be able to get reliable

measurements.

The students standing at each of the line would measure the angle they saw the rocket fly

up at. The angel would then be place in the equation h=50tan𝛉 + 1.5 in order to solve for the

height. The 50 comes from the distance away from the rocket and the 1.5 is the average height of

one highschool student in meters. The derivation of that equation is shown below.

Once the rockets were launched, recall there were three students recording angels and not

just one. There was a difficulty of accurately measuring the angle when the rocket went really

high. First off, it was hard to see once the rockets went high and second, the rocket didn’t go

straight up. After each student would get the angels, the average would be found of all three and

that's what angel was used for the equation related to height. Whatever the number the protractor

got, the number 90 always had to be subtracted from it because when the protractor was at the

horizon, that would be 90 degrees in this lab.

Angle A B C

Jacob 38 50 49

Paulina 53 57 63

Donovan 36 40 75

Average 42 49 62

Each average was put into the equation h=50tan𝛉 + 1.5 solving for height. The height of rocket

A was 44m, rocket B was 59m, and rocket C was 103m.

Conclusion

When comparing the actual results of the height of the rocket to what the predicted height

was.

A B C

Actual 44 59 103

There are many possible reasons why the predictions were so off from the actual height

of the rocket launch. One is the rocket was actually losing mass from the engine fuel of the

rocket, but during all of the predictions, mass was staying constant. If mass changing was put

into the calculations, there would of been more of a accurate prediction. Another reason would

be that the rockets didn’t go straight up. In the predictions, the height was calculated for the

rocket going straight up, but in the actual lunch it went at more have a curve. One final possible

reason is there could of been human error. For the people finding the angel. It could've been

difficult to see the rocket go into the sky, one because it was cloudy, but two the rockets went

fast up and made it hard to see. What we could've done differently to get more accurate results

was launch the rockets on a day less cloudy, and also take account for the mass changing while

calculating the prediction and taking account that the rocket wasn't going to go straight up when

making a prediction.

Reflection

I really enjoyed the Rocket Lab. I think it has been my favorite activity we have done all

year in honors physics. It was so interesting to notice how every unit that we learned in physics

can come back and connect to each other. I think one of the most challenging part of the report

and lab was keeping in tack every little detail. During all the math that was used, it is so easy to

make one minor error that would mess up the entire results. This activity taught me to be extra

careful with my work and to check each equation twice for the most accurate results. This lab

was super beneficial because it gave me a real life scenario and taught me and how to use

different parts of physics to relate to one common goal. Overall, I am so glad I was able to

participate in this experience and I will always remember through my junior year.

- nemo_yr1Uploaded byLeandro Meili
- Air RocketsUploaded byamitghade
- Cal116 First Order Differential Equations Models Mixing Problems and Dynamics of Falling ObjectsUploaded bymarchelo_chelo
- Sounding Rocket Gust Angle of Attack3.docUploaded bytolomeo10
- Fluid Machinery Introduction NPTELUploaded byAbhishekVerma
- drag and lift in olympic gamesUploaded byIslam Kabil
- QuestionsUploaded bysruthivarma07
- Aerodynamic Modeling & Simulation of HgvUploaded byManjunath Pattar
- The Leading Edge by Goro Tamai - Table of ContentsUploaded byBentley Publishers
- MomentumUploaded byDesign
- v46-90Uploaded bySandeep Varma Sagi
- Car Aerodynamics (Lecture) - New (2)Uploaded byKenneth Frank
- Rockets Risk AssesmentUploaded byrl228
- F4 NoteUploaded bymoonxxzz
- (UAV) - Aircraft DesignUploaded byginno18019048
- UntitledUploaded bybluegalago
- 0712.3520fUploaded bySam
- Physics Advanced Subsidiary Level DefinationsUploaded byDeval
- ddw2Uploaded bycelmail
- CFX13_07_Physics2.pptUploaded byvicky3000
- Project 1Uploaded bySathya Seelan
- Momentum ProblemsUploaded byBeverly Moguel
- CMO 09 s2008 - Annex III BSME Course Specification.pdfUploaded bycresjohn
- Mathematics M1 EDEXCELUploaded byballpoint96
- Falcon 9 V1.1 Reverse EngineeringUploaded byPatrick Cieslak
- Introduction to Lifting Line theoryUploaded byEthan Loza
- High Speed AerodynamicsUploaded byjoy todi
- Rahul Yadav rptUploaded byRahul Yadav
- My First Experience in a Badminton CompetitionUploaded byDan Sorolla
- AD II 3 INTUploaded byManiyarasu Oppilamani

- State FeedbackUploaded byNipuna_Wickram_5399
- Algebraic Expressions 1Uploaded byHana Tyde
- Stepwise Multiple RegressionUploaded byDwi Endah Kusrini
- Lecture Notes 2Uploaded byRaja Ram
- 294638521 Introduction to Matlab PptUploaded bySanjid Elahi
- Milestones for 2 to 3 Yr OldsUploaded bykrithikanvenkat
- Linear PredictionLinear Prediction in Kalman Filter Paper in Kalman Filter PaperUploaded byFaheem Khan
- 6. Matlab TutorialUploaded byTej Swaroop
- 201.ev1.12.Lec10Uploaded byWin Radaza
- Computation2.pdfUploaded byAbdelkhalek Bouanani
- FINITE DIFFERENCE WENO SCHEMES WITH LAX–WENDROFFUploaded byxuanquilieu
- MBCQ 721 Quantitive Techniques for Mangement and Applications -NEWUploaded byusamampk
- Regresion__15226_4fps%5B1%5DUploaded byCybelle M. Lopez Valentin
- 1 IntroductionUploaded bycallmeravi81
- CalcI Complete SolutionsUploaded byFiq Den
- Two Envelopes ParadoxUploaded bydaveyboy22
- squares and rootsUploaded byapi-380857622
- ch10Uploaded byjaansyda
- Ifo Theo&Coding-Compiled-PSSUploaded byRaksha Sv
- Zoe Chatzidaki - Model Theory & Applications Algebra Analysis - 2.pdfUploaded byΧάρης Φραντζικινάκης
- Quantitative and Reasoning Training Material.pdfUploaded bymouni chowdary
- Cheat_mlUploaded byRahul Babarwal
- Probability of Winning at TennisUploaded byYuri Lookin
- WBJEE_2016_Solution_Maths.pdfUploaded bycolorado wilderness
- CSAT RemaindersUploaded bystrshirdi
- Math Investigation Inverse FunctionsUploaded bysilvermalign
- Teori Excel1Uploaded byMaya Wulandari
- M.T.a.P. Grade Six Sectoral Finals 2006Uploaded bydrumx
- 58579597 Marno Verbeek Modern Eco No Metrics WileyUploaded byMillardi Nadesul
- 2017_01_11_15_12_01Uploaded byTushar Kant