You are on page 1of 2

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY

HUMAN HISTORY AND THE EMERGENCE AND


DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE

Sustainable Development Goals (2015-2030)


1. No poverty
2. Zero Hunger
3. Good health and well-being Science Philosophical Problems
4. Quality education ● Ethical
5. Gender equality ● Epistemological- sense experience vs reason
6. Clean water and sanitation ● Metaphysical- laws, causation, explanation
7. Affordable and clean energy
8. Decent work and economic growth The Ancient Ages
9. Industry, innovation and infrastructure ● began at the end of the Iron Age, that is
10. Reduced inequalities prehistory, at it starts with the appearance of
11. Sustainable cities and communities writing around four thousand years before Christ
12. Responsible consumption and production and ends with the fall of the Western Roman
13. Climate action Empire around 500 years after Christ. During this
14. Life below water period the first civilizations arose and developed.
15. Life on land Middle Ages
16. Peace, justice, and strong institutions ● Term for Western Europe during the postclassical
17. Partnerships for the goals era
● Began with the fall of Rome and ended in the
Additional theories that could intervene in the 1400s
attainment of these goals: ● Also called the Dark Ages
● Historians once called the early middle ages the
1. Social Darwinism dark ages because they focused on the problems
- Survival of the fittest of the time: lack of central government,
- Herbert Spencer widespread disease (plague), long religious war,
- An application of the theory of natural little access to education, and lack of
selection to social, political, and technological or cultural development
economic issues. The Renaissance
- The idea: the white European race was ● It is a period from the 14th to the 17th century,
superior to others, and therefore, considered the bridge between the middle ages
destined to rule over them. and modern history.
- Darwin’s theory of natural selection: in ● It started as a cultural movement in Italy in the
nature, the strong survive and those best Late Medieval period and the later spread to the
suited to survive (adaptation) will out-live rest of Europe.
the weak.
- Social Darwinism: those with strength Philosophy
(economic, physical, technological) ● Philosophy is a way of thinking about the world,
flourish and those without are destined the universe and society. It works by asking very
for extinction basic questions about the nature of human
thought, the nature of the universe and the
2. Social Exchange Theory connections between them. The ideas in
- A psychological theory that attempts to philosophy are often general and abstract.
explain the social factors that influence Philosophy vs Science
how individuals interact within a ● Difference: the way they work and treat
reciprocal relationship. knowledge
- The basic formula for predicting behavior ● Science is concerned with natural phenomena,
while philosophy attempts to understand the
nature of man, existence, and the relationship
that exists between the two concepts, meanwhile,
- Cost-Benefit Analysis science is only concerned with the latter.
1
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY

● The criteria of “falsifiability” is a philosophical theories in the history and philosophy of


construct create dby philosophers of science in science into a whole new context.
➔ Coined the term “paradigm”
hopes of solidifying what constitutes the
“scientific method”.
Normal science vs Revolutionary science
● Natural scientists- study the physical world
- It is in this period of revolutionary science that
● Social scientists- study human behavior
theories are checked, previously held formulas
are re-analyzed and possible refutations are
METHODS OF SCIENCE
generated, for a new paradigm or paradigm shift
● Science is based on facts
to occur.
**Solving problem is scientific progress
Inductivism
- It proposes and rests on a common
PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE
understanding of the laws of the universe; there
● Knowledge is an end toward which both strive.
are laws of nature, uniformities that govern these
● Their difference is the type of knowledge that they
laws.
seek.
- Facts are observable, and that theories should be
● Science seeks knowledge of facts while
derived from these facts by observation.
philosophy seeks ultimate knowledge
(observation is using the senses, seeing is
believing)
- Observable facts are objective.

Hypothetico-deductivism
● Rejects context of discovery
● Hypothetico-deductivism asserts that “facts” are
not always observable. (facts have come to
scientists not by observation but rather by
accident, through dreams, visions and
preexisting theories)
● Rejects the notion that facts are neutral and
objective.
● Theories are confirmed, not proven, yet every
instance that lends support corroborates the
theory.

Falsificationism
● Also rejects the context of discovery
● Confirmation of hypothesis is not enough (no
specific confirmations will make nay hypothesis
true)
● A body of science must be falsifiable
● The notion of scientific progress for the
falsificationist rests on the premise that scientific
theories are tentative.

Conjecture and Refutation


● Science must continue to progress through an
open quest to put existing theories to the test,
allowing preconceived notions of “facts,”
whatever they may be, up to scientific criticism
and refutation.
➔ Thomas Kuhn famously published The
Structures of Scientific Revolutions in
1962, a publication that brought previous

You might also like