Professional Documents
Culture Documents
oh nooo
bail?
No repeat offender
whaa?
oh man...
someone he knew?
...
was he at the homless shelter?
*living
I do t think so
Don’t think so
oh man
well... i hope everyone is ok
i guess it'll be like 18 months sorta deak huh?
I wouldn’t know
Have you ever talked to someone who has beaten someone up?
...stabbed or shot someone?
Yeah why?
Yup
SUch are all offenses far more detrimental to someone than what Dino probably did...
Your argument has no base, why would you not talk to one but talk to the violent others?
But it takes a sick fuck to sexually assault someone
The other crimes are financially motivated
Ha
Yeaahhh
I see
okay
that sounds alright!
I haven't had a girlfriend (relationship) since I moved to Van 6 years ago, man.
But I'm always up for a good fuck!
Anyways, your argument still doesn't hold up. You can't cherry pick which forms of violence you allow.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Cognitive_Bias_Codex_With_Definitions
%2C_an_Extension_of_the_work_of_John_Manoogian_by_Brian_Morrissette.jpg
This is a better one:
https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/rhetological-fallacies/
So (not to be mean), your argument is representing some logical fallacies.
Which, are errors in rational, in an argument or logic.
Here are some that I find can be applied to:
"I don't like perpatrators of sexual assault, but, I don't mind perpatrators of
violent crime - for profit - tat includes the exploitation of mental disorder and substance abuse."
Hold on...there are several flaws in your logic;
You ever noticed how philosophers always need a sandwich?
...Are you misleading the conversation to avoid being incorrect in your argument?
Yeah eh
Genetics and environment, circumstance - these are the causes of abhorrent behavior.
Yeah
He just owes me a lot of money right now