You are on page 1of 3

“Globalization” MEANS growing economic and cultural interconnectedness

between different regions of the world DUE to modern transportation and


electronic communication making commercial relationships easier.

It has, no doubt, brought unanticipated benefits is a contentious globally.

It has benefitted us with the necessary good things but again brought with it
tha danger of reliance altogether.

The problems with this has crept in the form of prices and recession.

No doubt, the low costs of living from developing nations with workers
surviving on less money reason that they get easy and cheap labour from
outside of US , cheap production of goods in the developing world has
fostered economic growth and encouraged business, it has also curbed the
working in own countries removing all employment and work opportunities
and labour for own country.

The main problem with US is the decreasing job opportunities for its own
people whereby it has spelled out European countries.

Now since the scenario has cascaded all work and job opportunities from
own country e.g. they started buying TV and such articles and appliances
from other countries.

These have added suspects to environmental benefits due to which global


problem is growing at an alarming rate.

The cheap production and large economies of scale benefits add one way
to the advantages but is very harmful for the environment and nation as a
whole. However, this also disturbs a nations trade balance weakening the
economy and causing imbalances thereon.

Globalization has cultivated a mutual reliance between countries that puts


pressure on governments to make safer and healthier choices but also
leads to dangers of pollution leading to environmental concerns and
disturbing its own nation's welfare and standard of people has to be
compromised there upon.

rococo style is only one sided art work and expresses a shallow piece
of work of art dismissing the general public in its expression of art is
an over-stated dismissal.

Rococo was also condemned for its frivolous subject matter and also
tended to focus on non-serious subject matter, such as aristocrats
playing games in the countryside or lovers on picnics.

BUT at the same time it constructed meeting places for the general
public like the Churches.

the critics have misguided the picnics and such places which was
otherwise the real work of sophistication.

like for example, the figure of two men pushing women is a suttle
piece of art.

the rococo style wasn't a shallow work of art at all which rather laid
much emphasis on some serious subject matters on the common class
as well.

The rococo style is, therefore, an amazing work of art.

Rococo artists were said to have created overly elaborate, expensive


art for wealthy audiences who exploited or ignored the working class,
which is only an opinion and not more in real.

Finally, it says that the Rococo’s emphasis on the use of expensive


materials to create an illusion of opulence has also fallen into disfavor.

but again the rococo style had elaborated unique techniques and
attracted mixed media to express paintings and has epitomised the
asymmetrical designs and mix blend of colors uniquely depicting the
impressive effect.

You might also like