Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IVY4
Pergamon Copyright 0 1994 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
03hO-5442194 $6.00+0.0l1
1. FOREWORD
Developing techniques for designing efficient and cost-effective energy systems is one of the
foremost challenges energy engineers face. In a world with finite natural resources and
increasing energy demand by developing countries, it becomes increasingly important to
understand the mechanisms which degrade energy and resources and to develop systematic
approaches for improving the design of energy systems and reducing the impact on the
environment. The second law of thermodynamics combined with economics represents a very
powerful tool for the systematic study and optimization of energy systems. This combination
forms the basis of the relatively new field of thermoeconomics (exergoeconomics).
the first initials of the participating investigators. The objective of the CGAM problem is to
show how the methodologies are applied, what concepts are used and what numbers are
obtained in a simple and specific problem. In the final analysis, the aim of the CGAM
problem is the unification of thermoeconomic methodologies. This comparison is not a
competition among methodologies. Each methodology has specific fields of applications for
which it provides proven and efficient solutions.
2. INTRODUCTION
For optimization purposes, it is necessary to specify the physical and cost models of the
installation as well as the objective function to be minimized. The latter consists of the total
costs of operation at a fixed demand. The models used in the CGAM problem are realistic but
incomplete from an engineering point of view since the object of this study is to present
distinct models of thermoeconomic optimization. Therefore, it would be unreasonable to use
an excessively complicated mathematical model to describe the performance of the plant.
The CGAM problem refers to a cogeneration plant which delivers 30 MW of electricity and
14 kg/s of saturated steam at 20 bar. The structure of the cogeneration plant is shown in Fig.
1. The installation consists of a gas turbine followed by an air preheater that uses part of the
thermal energy of the gases leaving the turbine, and a heat-recovery steam generator in which
the required steam is produced. The environmental conditions are defined as To = 298.15K
a.ndP, = 1.013 bar. The fuel for the total plant is natural gas (taken as methane) with a lower
heating value (LHV) equal to 50000 kJ/kg.
In the definition of the problem, the equations that describe the behavior of the system
(physical model), the equations for calculating the capital costs of the components (economic
model) and the equations of state used to calculate the thermodynamic properties
(thermodynamic model) are considered. The decision variables selected for the optimization
are the pressure ratio P,/Pr, the isentropic efficiencies of the air compressor (qAc) and the gas
turbine (qor) and the temperatures of the air at the air-preheater exit fr,) and of the
combustion gas at the gas-turbine inlet (T4). The following models are formulated as a
function of these decision variables.
- Air
- BFWISteam
Net Power
e POWX
To’y,
iv& 30 Mw
AIR COMPRESSOR
Here we present the equations that make up the physical model of the cogeneration plant.
These are the mass and energy balances for each component of the plant.
T,= T,
3’ =
1 To,
,
II
1
T, -%Jl
=T4(l -[pq},
w0-r= figcp,g
CT, - T,),
W”, = War - WAC with W,,a = 30 Mw.
Heat-Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG):
T,, = Tg - AT, with AT, = 15 K,
4. THERMODYNAMIC MODEL
To solve the physical model and to calculate the variables of state for the cogeneration
plant, a simplified model for calculating the thermodynamic properties of the streams was
Used.
Reference environment
Pressure: atmospheric pressure P, = 1.013 bar.
Temperature: atmospheric temperature T, = 25 “C.
Reference substances: air (relative humidity = 60%) with the mole fractions
0
xO*
= 0.2059, xi, = 0.7748, x&, = 0.0003, x,&o = 0.0190. In this reference
environment, the exergy and energy values are zero for each reference substance. For energy
balance calculations, this reference-environment definition is consistent with the LHV
definition.
In this equation, f is the fuel/air molar ratio. The molecular weights of methane and air are
Mc”, = M, = 16.043 kg/kmol and M, = 28.648 kg/kmol, respectively.
exew - T.
1
- T, - T, 1nTi + R,T,lnp,*i .
T0 I 0
5. ECONOMIC MODEL
When evaluating the costs of a plant, it is necessary to consider the annual cost of fuel and
the annual cost associated with owning and operating each plant component. The expressions
for obtaining the purchase costs of the components (Z) are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Based
on these costs, the general equation for the cost rate (ii in $1~) associated with capital
investment and the maintenance costs for the ith component is
ii = ZiCRl$/(N x 3600).
Here Zi is the purchase cost of the ith component ($), CRF is the annual capital recovery
factor (CRP = 18.2%), N represents the number of hours of plant operation per year (N =
8000 h), and p is the maintenance factor (p = 1.06).
The total cost rate of operation for the installation is obtained from
5
C:T = ct in, LHV + iC1 ii,
where CT is the total cost rate of fuel and equipmeit ($/s) and Z is the purchase cost ($)
of the ith equipment item (i = AC, APH, CC, GT and HRSG).
284 ANTONIOVALERO et al
Table 1. Equations for calculating the purchase costs (Z) for the components.
Compressor’
11 + E=YC,,T, - C24)l
Combustion Chamber’
Turbine’
Air Preheated
Heat-Recovery Steam
Generato?
h,, rh,, fiti are the mass flow rates of air, gas and steam, respectively; h, and h, are
the specific enthalpies of streams 5 and 6; ATLM is the log mean temperature
difference; &., and Q, represents the rate of heat transfer in the preheater
(economizer) and evaporator, respectively. _I
Table 2. Constants used in the equations of Table 1 for the purchase cost
of the components (Table 1).
The physical and cost models of the CGAM system have five degrees of freedom
represented by the decision variables chosen (PJPi, qAc, qoT, T, and T4). The optimization
problem consists of minimizing the total operating costs of the cogeneration plant assuming a
fixed rate of electricity production of electricity for process steam. Thus, the optimization
problem can be expressed as the minimization of the objective function F, which is equal to
CT, i.e. of
F = cf m, LHV + i,, + i,, + i,, + iGT + in,
subject to the constraints imposed by the physical, thermodynamic and cost models of the
installation.
Tables 3 through 6 present the optimum values of the CGAM system variables. These
values were obtained through conventional optimization techniques. It is apparent that this
solution to the CGAM problem is unrealistic from the practical viewpoint since it require,
among others, a minimum temperature difference at the pinch of only 1.64 K (Table 5). The
mathematically optimal solution is presented here to facilitate the comparisons and discussions
in the following four papers.
In these papers, different procedures for optimizing the CGAM system are presented. They
all have in common the definition of the physical, thermodynamic and cost models plus the
objective function, which means that the same problem is solved with different procedures of
thermoeconomic optimization.
REFERENCES
Table 5. Values of selected Table 6. Gntimal cost values in the CGAM problem.
thermodynamic variables
Total Cost Rate 0.362009 $/s
in the optimal design
of the CGAM problem. Fuel Cost Rate 0.325489 $1~
NOMENCLATURE