CAN P 1579 2014 - e

CAN-P-1579:2014
Document Title (DRAFT)

CAN-P-XXXX:YYYY
Laboratory Accreditation Program
Requirements for the Accreditation of

Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories
CAN-P-1579:2014
2014-03-11
Standards Council of Canada 1 / 30

Laboratory Accreditation Program
Requirements for the Accreditation of

Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories
CAN-P-1579:2014
2014-03-11
Standards Council of Canada

270 Albert Street, Suite 200
Ottawa, ON K1P 6N7
Telephone: + 1 613 238 3222

Fax: + 1 613 569 7808
Email: info@scc.ca
Website: www.scc.ca
© Standards Council of Canada, 2014
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or
otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Standards Council of Canada.

Requirements for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories
CAN-P-1579:2014
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................3

Foreword .........................................................................................................................4
Context............................................................................................................................5
Introduction to CAN-P-1579:2014....................................................................................6
1. Scope ........................................................................................................................7
2. Normative References ...............................................................................................7
3. Definitions .................................................................................................................8
4. Management Requirements ......................................................................................9
5. Technical Requirements ..........................................................................................10
6. Evaluation of Laboratory Performance By Proficiency Testing ................................. 18
7. Physical Sample Preparation at Mineral Analysis Laboratories................................ 22
Informative References .................................................................................................25

CAN-P-1579:2014
Foreword
The Standards Council of Canada (SCC) is a Crown corporation within the Industry
Canada portfolio. With the goal of enhancing Canada's economic competitiveness and
social well-being, SCC leads and facilitates the development and use of national and
international standards, and provides accreditation services to over 500 customers,
including product certifiers, testing laboratories, and standards development
organizations. SCC represents Canada at the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) and oversees the Canadian National Committee of the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).
This Canadian Procedural (CAN-P) Document is part of series of publications issued by

the Standards Council of Canada that define the policy and operational requirements for
core programs established in support of its mandate. Requests for clarification,
amendments, or additional copies should be addressed to info@scc.ca.
Please be aware of the following directives used within this document: “shall” is used to
express a requirement that the user must satisfy to be in compliance with the CAN-P;
“should” is used to express a recommendation, or that which is advised but not required;
and “may” is used to express an optional, permissible, action that the user may
undertake within the limits of this CAN-P. Be advised that notes do not contain
requirements. The purpose of a note is to simply provide additional information.
A list of all SCC programs and accredited bodies is publicly available at www.scc.ca.

CAN-P-1579:2014
Context
The Program Specialty Area - Mineral Analysis (PSA-MA) program is operated and
managed by the SCC through its Program for Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada
(PALCAN). The assurance that a mineral analysis laboratory adheres to recognized
practices and standards can be achieved through accreditation in this program.
Accreditation under the PSA-MA program is the formal recognition by the Standards
Council of Canada of the competence of a mineral analysis laboratory to perform this
type of activity. It is not a guarantee that test results will conform to standards or
agreements between a testing laboratory and its customer’s business. Transactions
between an accredited testing laboratory and its customers are legal matters between
the two parties.
The specific requirements for mineral analysis testing were developed through the
Mineral Analysis Working Group (MAWG) that is constituted by and reports to the SCC
Working Group Secretariat. The technical basis is drawn from published principles,
practices and procedures used or promoted by national/international organizations.
This document was designed to meet International Organization for Standardization

(ISO/IEC) 17025 requirements. Rather than serving as a "stand alone" document, it is
designed to harmonize with and complement the SCC document CAN-P-4E, "General
Requirements for the Accreditation of Calibration and Testing Laboratories", which is
ISO/IEC 17025. These requirements are also based on the ISO/IEC 17043:2010
Conformity assessment – General requirements for proficiency testing. In development
of this document, the committee relied on the International Laboratory Accreditation Co-
operation (ILAC), Asia Pacific laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (APLAC) and ISO
documents and references as applicable.
Accreditation by SCC requires an on-site assessment of the laboratory as well as prior

and continued participation and satisfactory performance in the proficiency testing
scheme for each test accredited. The accreditation program is operated and managed
by the SCC through its Program for Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada (PALCAN).
PALCAN is operating in accordance with ISO/IEC Guide 58 Calibration and Testing
Laboratory Accreditation Systems - General Requirements for Operation and
Recognition.
The scope of these requirements will be evaluated periodically to respond to customer

and laboratory needs or to reflect improvements in the available science, technology or
regulatory changes.

CAN-P-1579:2014
Introduction to CAN-P-1579:2014
The general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are
described in CAN-P-4E (ISO/IEC 17025:2005). These requirements are designed to
apply to all types of calibration and objective testing and therefore need to be interpreted
with respect to the type of calibration and testing concerned and the techniques
involved. The SCC policy CAN-P documents also apply.
This Program Speciality Area – Mineral Analysis (PSA-MA) document provides an

elaboration, interpretation and additional requirements to those requirements in CAN-P-
4E that are required for laboratories involved in performing mineral analysis testing. It is
expected that where no elaborations, interpretations or additional requirements are
stipulated in this document for the elements of the standard, that the SCC PALCAN
CAN-P Policy documents and best scientific practices in the area of mineral analysis
testing will guide the assessment process.
The program is designed to ensure mineral analysis testing laboratories meet minimum
quality and reliability standards and to ensure a demonstrated uniform level of
proficiency among these mineral analysis testing laboratories. This document identifies
the minimum requirements for accreditation of laboratories supplying mineral analysis
testing services.
This document does not re-state all the provisions of CAN-P-4E and laboratories are
reminded of the need to comply with all of the relevant criteria detailed in CAN-P-4E and
the current edition of the CAN-P-1570 “PALCAN Handbook”. The main clause numbers
in this document generally follow those of CAN-P-4E, but since not all clauses require
interpretation, the numbering of clauses may not be continuous. Clauses 6 and 7 are
unique to this document.
To obtain initial accreditation by SCC under the PSA-MA program, a laboratory shall
successfully complete both a proficiency testing regimen and an on-site assessment by
technical specialists. The assessments will be conducted using standard SCC
assessment protocols such that:
• a comprehensive on-site assessment of the program will occur every two years;
and
• surveillance questionnaires, including monitoring of proficiency testing results,
will be conducted in the intervening years.
Laboratories are also reminded of the need to comply with any and all relevant statutory
or legislative requirements applicable to the jurisdiction in which they operate. With
respect to health and safety legislation, this normally requires the establishment of a
health and safety committee, or if the laboratory is small, an employee with responsibility
for overall safety, as per Section 1.5 of CAN-P-4E.
This document has been developed by a working group of interested parties in SCC’s
Mineral Analysis Laboratory Accreditation Program. It was reviewed by all interested
parties, and all comments were disseminated. SCC’s Accreditation Advisory Panel
reviewed the process for impartiality, and the document was approved by the Vice
President, Accreditation Services.

CAN-P-1579:2014
1. Scope
The PSA-MA program for mineral analysis testing laboratories applies to tests
associated with the measurement of all media used in mining exploration and
processing. This includes, but is not limited to, sediments, rocks, ores, metal
products, tailings, other mineral samples, water and vegetation. However, it cannot
cover all aspects of mineral analysis testing and shall be regarded as being
representative of this area of activity. The specific scope described below was
selected because of the market demand. This scope may be modified, depending on
market and regulatory requirements.
The Laboratory shall participate in the PTP MAL program for all accredited tests that
are included in the PTP MAL scope.
2. Normative References
The following referenced documents are essential for the application of this
document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any
amendments) applies.
a. CAN-P-4E:2005, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and

Calibration Laboratories (ISO/IEC 17025-2005). Standards Council of
Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2005).
b. CAN-P-15, Policy for the Suspension and Withdrawal of Accreditation and the
Resolution of Complaints, Disputes and Appeals Standards Council of
c. CAN-P-1570, Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories – Canada

(PALCAN), PALCAN Handbook, Standards Council of Canada, Ottawa,
Ontario, Canada (2010).
d. CAN-P-1595, Requirements for Accreditation of Laboratories Engaged in

Test Method Development & Non-Routine Testing. Standards Council of
e. CAN-P-1623, PALCAN Interpretation and Guidance on the Estimation of

Uncertainty of Measurement in Testing (APLAC T005). Standards Council of
f. CAN-P-1624, Policy for Participation in Proficiency Testing Activities.

Standards Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2012).
g. CAN-P-1625, PALCAN Policy on Guidelines and Procedures for Laboratories

with Serious and Critical Non-Conformities. Standards Council of Canada,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2006).
h. CAN-P-1626, Policy on Calibration and Measurement Traceability. Standards

Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2011).

CAN-P-1579:2014
i. CAN-P-1628, PALCAN Policy on the Use of Information Technology in

Accredited Laboratories. Standards Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada (2006).
j. CAN-P-1629, PALCAN Guidance for the Validation of Test Methods.

Standards Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2006).
k. CAN-P-1630, PALCAN Interpretations for Conducting Assessments of

Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Standards Council of Canada, Ottawa,
Ontario, Canada (2008).
l. CAN-P-1631, PALCAN Guidelines for the Use of Accreditation Body Logos

and for Claims of Accreditation Status (ILAC G14:2000). Standards Council
of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2005).
m. ILAC P9:11/2010 ILAC Policy for Participation in Proficiency Testing

Activities. ILAC, Silverwater, AUS (2010)
n. BIPM JcGM 200:2012, International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and

general concepts and associated terms (VIM). (2012). (JCGM 200:2008 with
minor corrections) V J Barwick and E Pricahrd (Eds), Eurachem Guide:
Terminology in Analytical Measurement – Introduction to VIM 3 (2011). ISBN
978-0-948926-29-7.
3. Definitions
All definitions in CAN-P-4E and VIM 3rd ed. and those applicable from ISO 17043
and ISO 9000 apply.
Scientists from different sectors often use different words for the same concept;
however, consistent definitions are essential if analysts and auditors are to
understand each other. Also, words can have several meanings and be used in
different ways. An example of this is the word “replicate” which has a generic
meaning and is used in general conversation; while, “replicate” has a specific
meaning in mining laboratories. For these terms, laboratories should clearly define
and use these terms consistently. The Eurachem Guide “Terminology in Analytical
Measurement - Introduction to VIM 3”, First Edition 2011 and the Analytical Methods
Committee Technical Briefs on terminology are good sources for these definitions.
For the purposes of this document the following definitions will be used:
3.1 Laboratory sample
The customer submitted material received by the testing laboratory or an off-site

physical sample preparation facility

CAN-P-1579:2014
3.2 Test Sample
Sample, prepared from the laboratory sample, from which the test portions are
removed for testing or for analysis.
NOTE: the test sample is the end result of physical preparation operations,
including all comminution, splitting, blending, and handling operations. The analyst
withdraws a test portion from the test sample.
4. Management Requirements
4.2 Quality system
4.2.5 Documentation shall include or make reference to the following supporting

procedures, however called:
• Test methods
• Standard operating procedures
• Work instructions, forms, spreadsheets, databases
• Protocols for method development and validation
• Internal laboratory control programs and
• Any Inter-laboratory comparisons or testing schemes as applied to each
scope of testing
4.3 Document control
CAN-P-1628 PALCAN Policy on the Use of Information Technology in Accredited

Laboratories applies when electronic mediums are used for document control.
4.4 Review of Requests, Tenders and Contracts
4.4.6 Laboratories that, as part of their accredited test(s), report test result(s) with
respect to the parent sample from “representative” prepared samples or sub-
samples received from an off-site physical sample preparation facility shall in
contracts with their customers specify the crushed top particle size and
pulverized pass criteria as required by section 6.
4.6 Purchasing Services and Supplies
4.6.2.1 When applicable, before being placed into use, reagents and standards shall be
verified against valid ones or verified by other means (ex. CRM, analytical QC
etc), and records of the verification be maintained.
4.13 Control of Records
4.13.2 Technical records shall include:
• Certificates of Analysis of Reference Materials and Reference Standards

• reagent preparation, for example, reagent preparation logs.

CAN-P-1579:2014
4.13.2.1
a) The technical records may include items such as records of

telephone/email conversations, evidence receipts, descriptions of
evidence packaging and seals, subpoenas, records of observations and
test/examination results, reference to procedures used, diagrams, print-
outs, photographs, videos etc.
b) Where instrumental analyses are conducted, operating parameters shall

be appropriately recorded.
c) The record of calculations and data transfers shall include when such
checks were carried out and by whom.
5. Technical Requirements
5.2 Personnel
5.2.1 Where test or technique specific training is given, documented acceptance

criteria shall be assigned. Whenever possible, satisfactory performance in the
analysis of quality control samples or correlation of results with those obtained
by other trained staff shall be used. The observation of the relevant tests or
analyses by an experienced officer is acceptable where a quantitative
assessment is not possible. The appropriate sign off shall be recorded.
Qualifications generally required in a mineral analysis testing laboratory are as

follows:
• key supervisors: appropriate degree, diploma, or equivalent and at least 3

years laboratory experience
• analysts: appropriate technical diploma or equivalent and variable years
laboratory experience depending on technical complexity of duties, which
is relevant to the test(s) being accredited
When an individual has not performed a test or technique for an extended

period of time, usually a year, the individual must demonstrate competence
before performing analysis of customer samples.
Some jurisdictions may have additional legislated requirements. The Quality

Manual or other QS documents shall reflect these requirements.
5.2.4 The job descriptions shall be dated and signed by each incumbent to
demonstrate their agreement and comprehension of the job description.
5.2.5 The Laboratory shall verify the credentials of its employees.
Laboratories shall provide cross training where appropriate.
Records shall be sufficiently detailed to provide evidence that staff performing

particular tasks have been properly trained and that their subsequent ability to
perform these tests has been formally assessed.

CAN-P-1579:2014
5.3 Accommodation and environmental conditions
5.3.1 Accommodations and environmental conditions will depend on the type and
volume of work being performed, and may include (as required):
• adequate lighting at work areas

• adequate power
• sufficient appropriately grounded outlets which are free of surges and
have voltage regulators in use
• back-up emergency power supply availability
• sufficient sinks with hot and cold running water
• suitable reagent water supply
• vacuum source which is able to maintain sufficient vacuum
• adequate bench space
• adequate floor area
• controlled temperature in specific laboratory areas as required
• controlled humidity in specific laboratory areas as required
• appropriate air quality in specific laboratory areas as required;
o ensure the laboratory is well ventilated (once single flow
ventilation, where appropriate) and
o have controls in place to limit exposure to dust and/or fumes
and/or oil and
o ensure the air is suitable for sample aeration and/or purging
• sufficient fume hoods, able to maintain appropriate face velocity
• appropriate refrigerated storage, including freezer storage, available for
samples and other materials
• measures to avoid cross contamination in areas in which trace levels of
contaminants in the work environment are evaluated and analyzed.
5.3.2 The laboratory shall have procedures for monitoring, controlling and recording
environmental conditions where applicable, such as:
• acceptable dust control

• acceptable lighting
• cleanliness of the laboratory, especially the sample preparation work area
• replenishment of consumables used in reagent water and/or dilution water
treatment records/monitoring. For example, the automatic alarms related
to Millipore water systems.
• water quality characteristics as required, especially conductivity on a daily
or as used basis and corrective actions taken for non-conformance
• temperature
• humidity
5.3.3 Special care is needed in mineral analysis testing laboratories involved in the
analysis or determination of trace levels of minerals, especially in the physical
preparation areas. Physical separation of high-level and low-level work is
required. Where special areas are set aside for this trace level work, access to
these areas shall be restricted and the work undertaken carefully controlled.
Appropriate records shall be kept to demonstrate this control. It may also be

CAN-P-1579:2014
necessary to carry out ‘environmental monitoring’ of equipment, work areas,

clothing and consumables.
5.3.4 A record shall be retained of all visitors to the operational areas of the laboratory.
5.3.5 Procedures shall be in place to ensure that the use of materials used in cleaning
and/or pest control do not cause interference with testing.
5.4 Test and calibration methods and method validation
5.4.2 Selection of Methods
Method verification is the confirmation that the laboratory can properly operate a
standard method. Method verification can be achieved by following the process
set out in ISO/IEC 21748 and the AOAC Guide “How to Meet ISO 17025
Requirements for Method Verification” available from the AOAC website:
http://www.aoac.org/accreditation/accreditation.htm
NOTE: see also CAN-P-1630 interpretative note.
NOTE: see also CAN-P-1595 Requirements for Accreditation of Laboratories

Engaged in Test Method Development & Non-Routine Testing.
NOTE: see also CAN-P-1629 PALCAN Guidance for Validation of Test Methods
5.4.5 Validation of Methods
In Mineral Analysis the method validation should meet the following

requirements:
a. The purpose of the method must be established. This will include the
analyte, the matrix, concentration range, the measurement uncertainty, and
whether the method is qualitative or quantitative.
b. The method validation requirements must be established. This will include
as appropriate the following analytical parameters to be validated:
• Limit of detection
• Limit of quantitation
• Selectivity
• Concentration Range
• Bias (Accuracy, Recoveries)
• Precision (Repeatability, Intermediate Precision)
• Ruggedness
• Measurement Uncertainty (see section “Estimation of uncertainty
of measurement”)
c. The acceptance criteria for the analytical parameters must be established.

The acceptance criteria must be associated with fitness for purpose.
d. The experiments needed to prove that the requirements of the method are
fulfilled must be planned, documented and approved.

CAN-P-1579:2014
e. The experiments are performed to collect the objective evidence that the
acceptance criteria have been met.
f. The raw data, calculations, and supporting evidence, for example, spectra,
shall be documented and kept in a validation file. This can be accomplished
in different ways with LIMS being the most common storage location for
data and the specific LIMS location is referenced in the validation file.
g. A check that the method meets the acceptance criteria shall be made
based on the validation experiments performed.
h. The validation shall include a statement that the method is fit for purpose
and must be approved by the authorized personnel.
NOTE: The Eurachem Guide “Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods - A

Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics” document is a
valuable resource for method validations.
5.4.6 Estimation of uncertainty of measurement
There are many approaches to estimating uncertainty. In mineral analysis

measurement uncertainty can be estimated from the duplicates and/or replicates
created at appropriate steps in the analytical process, such as at the sampling (if
applicable), crushing, pulverizing, and measurement steps. The uncertainty from
the bias determination can be estimated from multiple analyses of a reference
material and must include the uncertainty of the reference value. If the analyses
of the reference material are taken from a long period of time, the long term
uncertainty component is included.
A table, such as follows, can illustrate these data sources and the uncertainty
components they cover.
Table of Uncertainty Components included in each data source.
Volume Conditions Same Different Bias Bias

Sampling Sub Decom- Same Different Sample
Data Source Weighing Manipu- (Temperature instrument Instrument from from
(field) sampling position Analyst Analyst Matrix
lations humidity, etc) Same day Day COA Lab
Duplicates
X X X X X X X X X
from Field
Duplicates*
X X X X X X X X
at Crushing
Replicates
X X X X X X X
at Weighing
CRM short
X X X X X X
term
CRM long
X X X X X X
term
CRM u X X
PT studies
X X X X X X
(long term)

CAN-P-1579:2014
The table quickly reveals that the data sources include multiple uncertainty
components, and that there is overlap. The uncertainty estimates for each data
source can be compared to determine if this overlap is significant (ideally less
than 1/3 of the largest uncertainty component). Finally, the uncertainty from the
uncertainty components can be combined to estimate the overall uncertainty. The
data may be accumulated and manipulated in a spreadsheet format.
NOTE: see also the Eurachem guide “Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical

Measurement” available from:
http://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam
NOTE: see also “GUM: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement”,

available from:
http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html
5.4.7 It is not necessary or reasonable to check the calculation and or transfer of every
test result. Evidence that a representative sampling of test results is taken, and
only those, are checked for calculation and or data transfer, will be required for
review of compliance to this requirement by the technical assessor.
5.6 Measurement Traceability
Refer to CAN-P-1626:2011 – Policy on Calibration and Measurement Traceability

used by Accredited Testing Laboratories for determining the acceptability of
calibration sources.
5.6.2.2 Testing
If the uncertainty component from use of volumetric glassware is significant, the

glassware shall be calibrated as follows. Class “A” glassware does not need to
calibrated before being placed into use, non-class “A” glassware must be
calibrated before being placed into use, and both must be calibrated at
appropriate intervals over the long term.
Method calibration procedures shall include use of an independent calibration

check standard to monitor calibration stability/accuracy. A check at the end of run
shall be made to confirm calibration stability/accuracy throughout the run. The
instrument response from samples shall not exceed the calibration range.
5.6.3 Reference Standards and Reference Materials
Reference and calibration materials or standards of stated purity or certification

will be obtained from a reliable source as outlined in CAN-P-1626 and 1627.
These materials or standards shall be traceable to national or international (for
example CanmetMining (CMIN), NIST) sources where possible. If such materials

CAN-P-1579:2014
or standards are not certified, the laboratory will develop procedures for verifying
their suitability as outlined in CAN-P-1627.
5.6.3.2 Reference Materials
In-house reference materials can be made traceable to Certified Reference

Materials by running them in tandem and documenting the results providing the
procedures in CAN-P-1626 and 1627 are followed. This shall be repeated with a
frequency that will be determined by the stability of the reference materials or
standards. Acceptable uncertainty will be documented.
5.6.3.3 Transport and Storage
It is preferable that reference materials and reagents be labelled directly on the

container. However, if that is not possible (for example due to the small size of
the container) the label must include a unique identifier for the reference material
or reagent and the laboratory must have a system, such as a file or log, to make
the required information readily available.
For reagents and for reference and calibration materials or standards the
following information must be readily available.
• content (e.g. identity, concentration)

• hazard warning, where applicable,
• expiration date if appropriate
• supplier
• grade (if applicable)
• supplier lot number or batch number
• date received, date opened, prepared or verified
• identity of analyst who opened the material, if needed
• identity of analyst who prepared or verified the material,
• dilutions used for preparation
• reference to the record of preparation
• storage conditions, where appropriate.
If these materials or standards have expired they may be used as QC material or

in-house reference materials provided they have been demonstrated to be fit for
use.
5.7 Sampling
The laboratory shall monitor the reliability of its sampling and sub sampling to
ensure any sub-sample taken (e.g. from a crushed rock split) is reliably and
demonstrably representative of the original sample submitted.
The records referenced on test sample containers must be retained for the life of
the test sample and must be readily available.
Record requirements for physical sample preparation are described in section 7.

CAN-P-1579:2014
5.8 Handling of Test and Calibration Items
Test sample container labels must uniquely identify the sample unambiguously
such that the audit trail may be maintained.
Containers used for holding test samples must be reasonably robust to withstand
normal laboratory handling and storage to minimize material loss, cross
contamination and alteration.
Containers used for holding test samples should not be made of materials that
could contaminate the test sample material or promote chemical reactions on the
test sample.
Containers used for holding test samples should be of construction that minimizes
the risk of segregating and / or selectively retaining in a non-random manner
substances that make up the test sample.
5.9 Assuring the quality of tests and calibration results
5.9.1 Appropriate quality control procedures shall include, but not be limited to:
• appropriate level of quality control effort (i.e., duplicate samples, replicate

samples, replicate tests, measurand spikes, method blanks and)
• use of control charting and the analysis of these charts such that short
and long term trends are detected
• and/or analysis of independently prepared check samples.
5.9.2 The range of quality control activities to be incorporated into mineral analysis
testing protocols on a routine basis may include, but is not limited to, the use of:
• control charting of reference material results

• duplicate and replicate tests
• range control charting of duplicate sample and replicate sample analysis
results
• independent checks (verification) by other authorized personnel
• independent checks on commercial calibration solutions
5.9.3 Accreditation by SCC in this PSA requires the laboratory demonstrate

competence for each test and measurand in its scope by continued participation
and satisfactory performance proficiency testing outlined in clause 6 of this
document.
The following requirements are for tests and analytes in the scope of
accreditation only.
For some specialized tests the CanmetMining (CMIN) proficiency testing scheme
does not provide samples, does not include all analytes, or there is no proficiency
testing program. Therefore, other mechanisms, listed below in decreasing
preference, shall be used to evaluate the laboratory performance.

CAN-P-1579:2014
a. Participate in a round robin, such as a study qualifying a reference material

or qualifying the method. A round robin is an existing study run by an
organization external to the laboratory. (This is the highest preference
or best option if no 17025 accredited PT program is available).
b. Perform an interlaboratory comparison. This study may or may not be
organized by the laboratory itself.
c. If an interlaboratory comparison is not possible, perform an intralaboratory
comparison, for example the laboratory arranges for several people to
analyze the same sample.
d. Perform a study within the laboratory that demonstrates the method
continues to work. An example of this is a spike recovery.
e. Comparison with another method.
f. Use Quality control parameters (such as use of CRM, use of in-house RM,
replicate testing, re-testing of samples or retained items, and correlation of
results for different characteristics of the sample.) [This is the least
preferred alternative.]
The lab must be able to demonstrate they attempted to meet these requirements
by actively looking for a round robin, and then tried to contact other laboratories
to see if they would participate in interlaboratory comparison, etc. down the list of
preferences.
The frequency for these mechanisms is ideally twice annually. All analytes should
be covered by the program over a two year period.
However, it is recognized the complexity of some activities is such that twice

annually is not practicable. For these cases, the laboratory must specify and
justify a frequency. The justification can be based on the complexity of the
method, the logistics of distributing samples, the complexity of the data analysis,
etc
In all cases the reference materials used in the studies must match the matrix
and behavior of actual samples as much as possible.
5.10 Reporting the results
5.10.2 Certificates of Analysis are often used for legal purposes. As such, information
contained in these reports is directed by the appropriate laws of the land.
j. The actual signature of the person authorizing the report need not be on
the report, but shall be maintained on file. An electronic signature is
sufficient, provided that the laboratory has procedures in place to guard
against improper use of the electronic signature.
k. The test report shall contain a clear statement to the effect that the test
results relate only to the items tested as received by the laboratory
(Section 5.10.2 in ISO/IEC 17025 includes the provision “where relevant”
but for CAN P 1579 there shall be no exceptions.)
5.10.6 Test reports shall identify tests that were subcontracted but laboratories are not
required to identify the subcontractor on the test report.

CAN-P-1579:2014
6. Evaluation of Laboratory Performance By Proficiency Testing

6.1 General Requirements
This section contains the specific requirements for the evaluation of mineral
analysis laboratory performance by proficiency testing (PT); it describes the
Proficiency Testing Program Program-Mineral Analysis Laboratories (PTP-MAL)
program; and also describes requirements for participating in other PT programs.
The Laboratory reports to the SCC prior to each assessment all the Proficiency
testing programs to which they subscribe.
If no proficiency testing program exists, the laboratory shall follow the requirements
in CAN-P 4E 5.9 and section 5.9 in this document. During the assessment, the
technical assessor will:
• evaluate the laboratory’s justification for following 5.9 to demonstrate

proficiency, and
• examine the laboratory’s performance.
The SCC MAWG, in consultation with SCC, has designated CanmetMining (CMIN)
to manage the CAN-P-1579 Proficiency Testing Scheme (PTP-MAL) in
accordance with SCC CAN-P-4E requirements, ISO/IEC 17043, and these
requirements.
The proficiency testing provider shall follow ISO/IEC 17043.
6.2 Multi-Analyte Methods
A method may be used to determine more than one measurand. The proficiency
testing program needs to cover all measurands included in the scope of
accreditation. For example, if the method uses ICP to determine 30 elements, PT
is needed for each of the 30 elements.
In some cases it may be difficult to include all measurands in a PT program, for

example, no PT program may exist for some measurands or PT programs will
include different measurands in successive rounds. In such cases, the laboratory
needs to follow the requirements in 5.9; however, in addition they may group
measurands together according to certain characteristics common to the group,
such as volatility, solubility. distribution, wavelength, sensitivity, or mass and use
one measurand as a surrogate for others that behave similarly. The justification for
this grouping shall be documented.
6.3 Laboratory Responsibilities
All procedures associated with the handling and testing of proficiency testing items
by the laboratory shall be carried out to the greatest extent possible in a manner
identical to routine method(s) of testing used for testing customer samples.
Laboratories shall analyze the proficiency testing items using the test method listed
in their Scope of Accreditation. If their scope contains more than one accredited
test method or analytical technique for the same measurand (e.g. zinc in sediment

CAN-P-1579:2014
by AD2/FAA and also by AD3/ICPE and/or by AD3/ICP-MS) then each accredited

test shall have its own proficiency testing result.
If the proficiency testing sample concentration for any measurand falls below the
test method detection limit the laboratory shall clearly indicate that to the
proficiency testing coordinator. This result will be considered to meet the
requirement for having participated in the PT round.
In the case where the concentration is outside the range for the accredited
method, the laboratory will not be required to analyze the PT item. The Lab should
report to the PTP Coordinator that the item is outside the accredited method range.
For example, a mineral concentrate sample will not be done using an exploration
test method.
Although laboratories will be required only to respond formally to Unsatisfactory

ratings, i.e. |z|>3, it is recommended that laboratories receiving Questionable
ratings (2<|z|<3) investigate and take action if needed.
Laboratories shall keep all proficiency testing provider final reports documents
relating to their scope under this PSA-MA for a minimum of 3 years. They shall
provide copies of any preliminary reports or final reports to the SCC when
requested by the SCC.
6.4 PTP-MAL
6.4.1 General
CanmetMining (CMIN) will recommend a proficiency testing coordinator to the

SCC MAWG. The SCC MAWG will assign a secretariat for the PT program.
6.4.2 Prior to becoming accredited
Prior to becoming accredited, a laboratory shall successfully complete two

successive proficiency testing rounds for each test for which accreditation is
requested. The laboratory must successfully complete the first round before
applying for accreditation and the second successive round must be successfully
completed before accreditation is granted.
6.4.3 After becoming accredited
Once accredited, the laboratory shall maintain demonstrated satisfactory

performance in the designated proficiency testing scheme, for each accredited
test on the scope.
For the PTPMAL Program this requires:
a. participation in a minimum of two proficiency testing rounds annually for

each accredited test
b. each proficiency testing round contains sample sets generally consisting
of four samples. These sample sets will generally have four [except for Pt

CAN-P-1579:2014
and Pd which should generally have two] different concentrations

spanning the normal target concentration range outlined below.
c. there will generally be eight proficiency testing results per year required
per accredited test. This is subject to the multi-element situation
described above.
6.4.4 Laboratory reporting to SCC secretariat
For any unsatisfactory measurand result, laboratories shall provide to the SCC
MAWG Secretariat, evidence the corrective action report (CAR) has been
initiated. This shall be submitted within 10 working days from the first date of
receiving the preliminary report from the proficiency testing provider.
Laboratories failing to accurately report their performance in any proficiency

testing round within this timeline may be subject to suspension.
6.4.5 SCC Secretariat responsibilities
SCC will assign a secretariat to the PTP-MAL program.
6.4.6 How SCC interacts with PTP-MAL provider
The SCC arranges a formal agreement with the PTP-MAL provider. This could
take the form of a Memorandum of Understanding, or any such agreement
acceptable to both parties.
6.4.7 SCC Evaluation of CAR
The corrective action report (however named) will be assessed by the Secretariat
using the same criteria as applies at an on-site assessment. If the content of the
report is not acceptable the Secretariat will follow-up with the laboratory.
The SCC tracks laboratories that have unsatisfactory performance to ensure that
they file CARs in a timely way.
6.4.8 SCC role in suspensions, etc.
Any appeal by a laboratory regarding the assessment of reported results by the

proficiency testing coordinator will be administered by SCC as explained in CAN-
P-15.
6.4.9 CanmetMining (CMIN) responsibilities
CanmetMining (CMIN) will recommend a proficiency testing coordinator to the

SCC MAWG.
The proficiency testing coordinator has no responsibility for monitoring the

laboratory’s proficiency testing performance as related to maintenance of SCC
accreditation. This is the sole responsibility of the SCC MAWG Secretariat.

CAN-P-1579:2014
6.4.10 Suspension
Requirements and Actions that may lead to suspension
If a Laboratory fails two consecutive rounds the laboratory may choose voluntary
withdrawal or the SCC may take actions to suspend following CAN-P-15. SCC
will consider several factors in determining whether the suspension of a test from
the scope of an accredited laboratory is necessary:
a. unsatisfactory performance in two consecutive rounds

b. failure to participate in a proficiency testing round
c. failure to take immediate corrective action on unsatisfactory proficiency
testing performance
d. failure to properly correct the unsatisfactory proficiency testing
performance in a timely manner
e. failure to report unsatisfactory proficiency testing results to the SCC
MAWG Secretariat within the timelines set above
f. failure to accurately report unsatisfactory performance
g. failure to treat PT items as routine samples
6.4.11 PTP-MAL Proficiency Testing Measurand List
The most recent list of items is listed at:
http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/minerals-metals/technology/proficiency-testing-
program/3185#desc
(Date of Issue: 2008-07-08)
Measurand Target Concentration Range Target Concentration Range

(Alternate units)
Gold 100 ppb to 15 g/metric ton 100 µg/kg to 15 mg/kg
Silver 1000 ppb to 1000 ppm 1000 µg/kg to 1000 mg/kg
Copper 1000 ppb to 2% 1000 µg/kg to 2%w/w
Lead 1000 ppb to 2% 1000 µg/kg to 2%w/w
Zinc 1000 ppb to 3% 1000 µg/kg to 3%w/w
Cobalt 1000 ppb to 0.1% 1000 µg/kg to 0.1%w/w
Nickel 1000 ppb to 2% 1000 µg/kg to 2%w/w
Palladium 100 ppb to 3 ppm 100 µg/kg to 3 mg/kg
Platinum 100 ppb to 3 ppm 100 µg/kg to 3 mg/kg

CAN-P-1579:2014
NOTE:
• The Canadian Certified Reference Material Project (CCRMP) –
CanmetMining (CMIN) is the currently designated Proficiency Testing
Provider for this proficiency testing scheme.
• This list of minerals and normal target concentration ranges may change
from time to time by agreement between CanmetMining (CMIN) and the SCC
MAWG. Amendments may be obtained, on request, from either the SCC
MAWG or from the documentation provided by CanmetMining (CMIN)
concerning the current proficiency testing program.
• This list is the normal target concentration range for the measurands within
each sample. However, in order to prepare representative samples generally
within these ranges, the proficiency testing coordinator may, at their sole
discretion, exceed (higher or lower) these limits on an individual
measurand(s) in an individual sample. Hence it may happen that not all
measurands in all 4 samples within a specific proficiency testing cycle will fall
within these exact target concentration ranges.
6.5 Other PT Programs
6.5.1 Prior to becoming accredited
Prior to becoming accredited, a laboratory shall successfully complete two

successive proficiency testing rounds for each test for which accreditation is
requested. The laboratory must successfully complete the first round before
applying for accreditation and the second successive round must be successfully
completed before accreditation is granted.
If this frequency is not attainable, then the SCC should be consulted to determine
an acceptable approach.
6.5.2 After becoming accredited
Once accredited, in order to remain accredited, the laboratory shall maintain

demonstrated satisfactory performance in the designated proficiency testing
scheme, for each accredited test on their scope. The proficiency testing data and
results will be examined by the auditor during the accreditation assessment.
7. Physical Sample Preparation at Mineral Analysis

Laboratories
7.1 General sample reduction assessment criteria
Physical sample preparation refers to the process in which bulk or other samples
have undergone any size reduction processes to provide an appropriate,
representative sub-sample. The reduction process may take place on-site or off-
site.

CAN-P-1579:2014
If the laboratory is analyzing sub-samples received from an off-site sample

reduction facility, then 5.10.2 (k) of CAN-P-4E applies - where relevant, a
statement to the effect that the results relate only to the items tested or calibrated.
7.1.1 The record of the laboratory sample mass on receipt and the test sample mass
after physical preparation must be maintained.
7.1.2 The assessment of the size reduction processes shall include the laboratory
demonstrating to the Technical Assessor the following:
a. The sample is crushed to the appropriate top particle size as specified in
the contract (e.g. 90% <10 mesh).
b. The pulp material is pulverized to pass the criteria specified in the
contract (e.g. 90% <150 mesh).
c. Items a) and b) may be documented by keeping a log book of regular
screen tests of the crushed and pulverized material on a regular basis.
7.1.3 There is a clear demonstration that all routinely used sieves employed have been
certified, are properly maintained, checked and cleaned at appropriate intervals.
7.1.4 Sieves are critical pieces of equipment and must meet the general requirements
of CAN-P-1627. The laboratory shall periodically confirm the sieves are suitable
for use. This may be done a few ways:
a. By use of particle size certified reference materials (CRM) or

b. By comparison to a “reference sieve” that is kept for the purpose of
checking against the sieves in use
c. Sieves with openings smaller than 0.15 mm are more easily damaged.
These should be checked more often than those with larger openings.
Sieves with openings greater than 2 mm require less frequent checking.
These are more robust and defects are generally obvious by visual
inspection.
7.2 Required documentation includes:
7.2.1 The manufacture’s certificate of compliance (stating their conformance to ISO

9001 and the manufacturing requirements of ASTM E11 and ISO 565 3310-1
7.2.2 The laboratory records “date the sieve was put into use”. (This information could
be recorded directly on the certificate.)
7.2.3 The laboratory records "date the sieve was removed from use". (This information
could be recorded directly on the certificate.)
7.2.4 The laboratory has developed and implemented a procedure(s) for use and
maintenance of sieves in the physical sample preparation area that meets the
following requirement:
7.2.5 Sieves are cleaned, usually via air hose, in between each sample and further
cleaning by other means if air cleaning fails to remove sample.
7.2.6 The sieves are regularly inspected for damage, for example, tears.

CAN-P-1579:2014
7.2.7 Proper maintenance can be demonstrated by recording cleanings in the log book
and recording observations that the sieve is not damaged.
7.3 Duplicates in Sample Preparation
The data from the duplicates is used to estimate the precision of the operation
being duplicated. This can be done through use of standard deviation, range,
relative standard deviation, etc. For this discussion the standard deviation is used.
7.4 Specific off-site sampling assessment criteria
For samples reduced off-site, the accredited test method must contain a clear
statement that the “physical preparation of samples” encompasses all processes
including those sample reduction processes from off-site physical sample
preparation facilities.
The assessment of the off-site preparation of samples for these specific accredited
test methods shall include the laboratory demonstrating to the Technical Assessor
the following requirements in addition to those mentioned above:
7.4.1 The log book of regular screen tests of the crushed and pulverized material shall
be accessible to the accredited laboratory, either electronically or by hard copy.
7.4.2 The off-site physical sample preparation facility has developed and implemented
a procedure for use and maintenance of sieves in the sample reduction area and
this procedure shall be accessible to the accredited lab.
7.5 Failure to meet specific off-site sampling assessment criteria
If the laboratory is unable to demonstrate during the assessment that all the
requirements for off-site facilities are met, the Laboratory will be required to
provide this evidence in response to the assessment finding. The laboratory may
elect to have SCC conduct an assessment at all or representative off-site physical
sample preparation facilities at the full cost to the laboratory.
7.6 Scope listings and test reports
For mineral analysis laboratories that choose to include off-site physical sample
preparation, then the use of off-site physical sample preparation shall be clearly
identified on their Scope of Accreditation. In the "Notes" section of the Scope there
shall be a statement similar to the following:
"The physical sample preparation involving accredited test methods as listed on

the scope of accreditation may be performed at .... (name) ...... laboratory or at
off-site physical sample preparation locations that are monitored regularly for
quality control and quality assurance practices."

CAN-P-1579:2014
Informative References
The following is an extensive list of recommended references:
• APLAC PT 002 Issue No. 6, 03/08 APLAC Testing Interlaboratory Comparisons.

APLAC, Abbotsford, AUS (2010). Available from www.aplac.org.
• APLAC PT 003 Issue No. 15, 11/10 APLAC Proficiency Testing Directory.
APLAC, Abbotsford, AUS (2010). Available from: www.aplac.org.
• APLAC PT 006 Issue No. 2, 09/10 Proficiency Testing Frequency Benchmarks.
APLAC, Abbotsford, AUS (2010). Available from: www.aplac.org.
• Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Traceability in Chemical Measurement. A guide to
achieving comparable results in chemical measurement. (2003) Available from
www.eurachem.org.
• Eurachem Guide: The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods. A Laboratory
Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics(1998) (ISBN 0-948926-12-0)
Available from www.eurachem.org.
• CITAC/Eurachem Guide: Guide to Quality in Analytical Chemistry. An Aid to
Accreditation (2002). Available from www.eurachem.org.
• Eurachem/CITAC Guide:, Quality Assurance for Research and Development and
Non-routine Analysis. (2008). ISBN 978-0-948926-29-7. Available from
www.eurachem.org.
• Eurachem/CITAC Guide:, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement.
(2000). ISBN 0-948926-15-5. Available from www.eurachem.org.
• V J Barwick and E Pricahrd (Eds), Eurachem Guide: Terminology in Analytical
Measurement – Introduction to VIM 3 (2011). ISBN 978-0-948926-29-7. Available
from www.eurachem.org.
• ISO 3534-1:2006, Statistics - Vocabulary and Symbols - Part 1: General
statistical terms and terms used in probability. ISO, Geneva (2006).
• ISO 5725-1:1994/Cor 1:1998, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement
methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions. ISO, Geneva
(1998).
methods and results - Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability
and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. ISO, Geneva (2002).
methods and results - Part 3: Intermediate measures of the precision of a
standard measurement method. ISO, Geneva (2001).
• ISO 5725-4:1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods
and results - Part 4: Basic methods for the determination of the trueness of a
standard measurement method. ISO, Gevena (1994).
methods and results - Part 5: Intermediate measures of the precision of a
standard measurement method. ISO, Geneva (2005).

CAN-P-1579:2014

methods and results - Part 6: Use in practice of accuracy values. ISO, Geneva
(2001).
• ISO 7870-1:2007, Control Charts – Part 1: General guidelines. ISO, Geneva
(2007).
• ISO 7870-2:2013, Control Charts – Part 2: Shewhart control charts. ISO, Geneva
(2013).
• ISO 7870-3:2012, Control Charts – Part 2: Acceptable control charts. ISO,
Geneva (2012).
• ISO 7870-4:2011, Control Charts – Part 4: Cumulative sum charts. ISO, Geneva
(2011).
• ISO 7873:1993, Control charts for arithmetic average with warning limits. ISO,
Geneva (1993).
• ISO 9000:2005, Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary.
ISO, Geneva (2005).
• ISO Guide 30:1992, Terms and definitions used in connections with reference
materials. ISO, Geneva (1992).
• ISO Guide 33:2000, Uses of certified reference materials. ISO, Geneva (2000)
• ISO 21748:2010, Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and
trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation. ISO, Geneva (2010).
• ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004, Standardization and related activities – General
vocabulary. ISO, Geneva (2004).
• ISO/IEC Guide 98-1:2009, Uncertainty of measurement – Part 1: Introduction to
the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva (2009)
• ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, Uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Guide to the
expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). ISO, Geneva (2008)
• ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, International vocabulary of metrology - Basic and
general concepts and associated terms (VIM).ISO, Geneva (2007).
• ISO Standard 13528:2005, Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by
interlaboratory comparisons. ISO, Geneva (2005).
• ISO/IEC 17025:2005. General requirements for the competence of testing and
calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva (2005)
• ISO/IEC 17043:2010, Conformity assessment – General requirements for
proficiency testing. ISO, Geneva (2010).
• Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). ISO, Geneva
(1993). ISBN 92-67-10188-9. (Reprinted 1995: Reissued as ISO Guide 98-3
(2008), available from www.bipm.org as JCGM 100:2008).
• Harmonised Guidelines for Internal Quality Control in Analytical Chemistry
Laboratories, (Technical Report) 1995 - Pure & Appl. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 4, pp
649-666, 1995. Available from www.iupac.org.

CAN-P-1579:2014
• Harmonized Guidelines for Single-laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis,

(IUPAC Technical Report) 2002 - Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 74, No. 5, pp 835-855,
2002. Available from www.iupac.org.
• Nomenclature, Symbols, Units and Their Usage in Spectrochemical Analysis – II.
Data Interpretation, (IUPAC) 1975- Pure & Appl. Chem. Vol. 45, pp. 99-103,
1976. Available from www.iupac.org.
• Taylor, John K. (1987) Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements. Chelsea,
MI: Lewis Publishers, p85, 1987.
• ASTM Standard E178-08, 2008, “Standard Practice for Dealing with Outlying
Observations”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008,
DOI:10.1520/E0178-08.
• UKAS M3003, The Expression of Uncertainty and Confidence in Measurement,
Edition 3, UKAS, Feltham, UK (2012). Available from www.ukas.com.
• The International Harmonized Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of Analytical
Chemistry Laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report) Prepared for publication by
Michael Thompson, Stephen L.R. Ellison, Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 78, No. 1, pp
145-196, 2006. Available from www.iupac.org.
• AMC Technical Brief, Terminology – the key to understanding analytical science.
Part 2: Sampling and sample preparation, Editor M Thompson, Analytical
Methods Committee AMCTB No 19 March 2005. Available from www.rsc.org.
• BIPM JcGM 200:2012, International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general
concepts and associated terms (VIM). (2012). (JCGM 200:2008 with minor
corrections).
• V J Barwick and E Pricahrd (Eds), Eurachem Guide: Terminology in Analytical
Measurement – Introduction to VIM 3 (2011). ISBN 978-0-948926-29-7.
• Eurachem/CITAC Guide CG4: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical
Measurement, (2012). Available from www.eurachem.org.
• Neubauer, Dean V. (Ed), (2010), MNL 7 Manual on Presentation of Data and
Control Chart Analysis: 8th Edition, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2010.
• ASTM Standard E2587–12, “Standard Practice for Use of Control Charts in
Statistical Process Control”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012,
DOI: 10.1520/E2587-12, www.astm.org.
• M.L. Jane Weitzel and Wesley M. Johnson (2013) Application of ISO/IEC 17025
Technical Requirements in Industrial Laboratories – Method Validation. Available
from www.friesenpress.com.

CAN P 1579 2014 - e

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CAN P 1579 2014 - e

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CAN-P-1579:2014

Document Title (DRAFT)

Laboratory Accreditation Program

Requirements for the Accreditation of

Standards Council of Canada 1 / 30

Requirements for the Accreditation of

Standards Council of Canada

Telephone: + 1 613 238 3222

© Standards Council of Canada, 2014

Standards Council of Canada 1 / 27

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................3

Standards Council of Canada 3 / 27

This Canadian Procedural (CAN-P) Document is part of series of publications issued by

Standards Council of Canada 4 / 27

This document was designed to meet International Organization for Standardization

Accreditation by SCC requires an on-site assessment of the laboratory as well as prior

The scope of these requirements will be evaluated periodically to respond to customer

Standards Council of Canada 5 / 27

This Program Speciality Area – Mineral Analysis (PSA-MA) document provides an

Standards Council of Canada 6 / 27

a. CAN-P-4E:2005, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and

c. CAN-P-1570, Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories – Canada

d. CAN-P-1595, Requirements for Accreditation of Laboratories Engaged in

e. CAN-P-1623, PALCAN Interpretation and Guidance on the Estimation of

f. CAN-P-1624, Policy for Participation in Proficiency Testing Activities.

g. CAN-P-1625, PALCAN Policy on Guidelines and Procedures for Laboratories

h. CAN-P-1626, Policy on Calibration and Measurement Traceability. Standards

Standards Council of Canada 7 / 27

i. CAN-P-1628, PALCAN Policy on the Use of Information Technology in

j. CAN-P-1629, PALCAN Guidance for the Validation of Test Methods.

k. CAN-P-1630, PALCAN Interpretations for Conducting Assessments of

l. CAN-P-1631, PALCAN Guidelines for the Use of Accreditation Body Logos

m. ILAC P9:11/2010 ILAC Policy for Participation in Proficiency Testing

n. BIPM JcGM 200:2012, International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and

3.1 Laboratory sample

The customer submitted material received by the testing laboratory or an off-site

Standards Council of Canada 8 / 27

3.2 Test Sample

4.2.5 Documentation shall include or make reference to the following supporting

4.3 Document control

CAN-P-1628 PALCAN Policy on the Use of Information Technology in Accredited

4.4 Review of Requests, Tenders and Contracts

4.6 Purchasing Services and Supplies

4.13 Control of Records

4.13.2 Technical records shall include:

• Certificates of Analysis of Reference Materials and Reference Standards

Standards Council of Canada 9 / 27

a) The technical records may include items such as records of

b) Where instrumental analyses are conducted, operating parameters shall

5.2.1 Where test or technique specific training is given, documented acceptance

Qualifications generally required in a mineral analysis testing laboratory are as

• key supervisors: appropriate degree, diploma, or equivalent and at least 3

When an individual has not performed a test or technique for an extended

Some jurisdictions may have additional legislated requirements. The Quality

5.2.5 The Laboratory shall verify the credentials of its employees.

Laboratories shall provide cross training where appropriate.

Records shall be sufficiently detailed to provide evidence that staff performing

Standards Council of Canada 10 / 27

5.3 Accommodation and environmental conditions

• adequate lighting at work areas

• acceptable dust control

Standards Council of Canada 11 / 27

necessary to carry out ‘environmental monitoring’ of equipment, work areas,