Detailed Site Investigation PDF

DONALD CANT WATTS CORKE
DETAILED SITE
INVESTIGATION REPORT
Calvary Ryde Retirement Community Centre
678 VICTORIA ROAD, RYDE, NSW
Report E23061 AB
13 March 2017
REPORT DISTRIBUTION
Detailed Site Investigation

678 Victoria Road, Ryde NSW
EI Report No.: E23061 AB_Rev0

Date: 13 March 2017
Copies Recipient
1 Soft Copy (PDF – Secured, issued by email) Donald Cant Watts Cork
Level 1, 14 Martin Place,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
Original (Saved to Digital Archives) El Australia

Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street,
PYRMONT NSW 2009
Author Technical Reviewer
Emmanuel Woelders Nathan Foster

Environmental Scientist Senior Environmental Scientist
Revision Details Date Amended By
0 Original 13 March 2017 -
© 2017 EI Australia (EI)

This report is protected by copyright law and may only be reproduced, in electronic or hard copy format, if it is
copied and distributed in full and with prior written permission by EI.
Detailed Site Investigation P a g e |i
Report No. E23061 AB_Rev0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
Donald Cant Watts Cork engaged EI Australia (EI) to conduct a Detailed Site Investigation (DSI) for
the property located at 678 Victoria Road, Ryde NSW (‘the site’). This environmental assessment
was completed as part of a development application to City of Ryde Council to allow site development
for an aged care facility classed as classed as residential, with basement car parking, recreational
open spaces and driveways.
Objectives
The main objectives of the assessment were to:
 Evaluate the potential for site contamination on the basis of historical land uses, anecdotal and
documentary evidence of possible pollutant sources;
 To investigate the degree of any potential contamination by means of limited intrusive sampling
and laboratory analysis, for relevant contaminants;
 Evaluate potential risks that identified impacts may pose to human health and the environment;
and
 Where site contamination is confirmed, make recommendations for the appropriate

management of any contaminated soils and/or groundwater.
Findings
 The site comprised an irregular shaped block, covering a total area of approximately 15,894 m .
2
The site is bound by Victoria Road to the north, The Gardens high-rise residential development
to the east and south, with the existing Calvary Ryde Retirement Community to the west;
 Soil sampling and analysis were conducted at twenty five (25) test bore locations. Sampling
regime was considered to be appropriate for investigation purposes and comprised
judgemental and systematic (triangular grid) sampling patterns, with allowance for structural
obstacles (e.g. building walls, underground and overhanging services and other physical
obstructions in use by existing operating businesses);
 The sub-surface layers comprised of granular and cohesive fill materials underlain by residual
Silty Clay and weathered Shale bedrock;
 Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 4.116 to 8.815 meters top of casing;
 Results of soil samples collected from soil test boreholes reported EIL/ESL excess nickel
levels at BH102_0.1-0.2 (83 mg/kg), BH102_1.0-1.1 (63 mg/kg), BH109_0.1-0.2 (57 mg/kg),
BH110_0.1-0.2 (54 mg/kg), BH110_0.5-0.6 (40 mg/kg), BH113_0.1-0.2 (53 mg/kg),
BH115_0.1-0.2 (64 mg/kg) and BH123_0.1-0.2 (37 mg/kg), excess zinc levels at BH106_0.1-
0.2 (240 mg/kg) and excess benzo(α)pyrene levels at BH112_0.1-0.2 (1 mg/kg);
 Asbestos was reported at reported in shallow fill at BH112;

Detailed Site Investigation P a g e | ii
 95% UCL calculations were conducted for nickel, zinc and benzo(α)pyrene for samples
collected from proposed grassed and landscaping areas and was calculated to be below of
their corresponding EIL criteria;
 Results of groundwater samples collected from monitoring well reported in excess of the
adopted groundwater investigation criteria at BH105W for cadmium (0.8μg/L), copper (13 μg/L),
mercury (4.7 μg/L), nickel (90 μg/L) and zinc (750 μg/L), BH117W for nickel (5 μg/L) and zinc
(26 μg/L) and BH120W for copper (2 μg/L), nickel (8 μg/L) and zinc (120μg/L). These
concentrations were considered to be within natural background concentrations for an
urbanised environment;
 The following data gaps were identified in this DSI will require closure during the remediation
phase of works, prior to site excavation:
 Further investigation to ascertain the spatial extent of asbestos contamination in soils

surrounding BH112; and
 The condition of soils beneath existing site structures, inaccessible during this
investigation.
Conclusions and Recommendations

Based on the findings of this report and with consideration of the Statement of Limitations (Section
12), localised asbestos contamination was reported at one testing location. Overall, EI consider that
the environmental condition of the site can be made suitable for the proposed development classed
as residential, with basement car parking, recreational open spaces and driveways, after carrying out
the recommendations described below:
 A Hazardous Materials Survey (HMS) should be completed prior to demolition of existing

structures, to ensure that hazardous materials that may have been used within the existing
buildings are adequately managed during demolition to prevent the spreading of contamination,
if present. The HMS should be conducted once all buildings have been vacated by current
users to enable access to all parts of the buildings and allow for an adequate survey;
 A Remedial Action Plan (RAP) should be prepared in accordance with the OEH (2011)
Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites prior to the commencement of site
works. The RAP will provide details of the methodology and procedures required for effective
site remediation, which may include:
 Further investigation, prior to site excavation and remedial works, to close data gaps
identified during the DSI;
 Outline the remediation requirements for contamination identified during this DSI and
other contamination that may be identified during data gap closure investigations;
 Provide the requirements and procedure for waste classification assessment, in order to
enable classification of site soils to be excavated and disposed off-site during the
proposed basement excavation and remedial works, in accordance with the Waste
Classification Guidelines (EPA, 2014); and
 Provide a SAQP for the validation of remediation activities performed on-site.

Detailed Site Investigation P a g e | iii
 Validate soils in accordance with the RAP to ensure that any contamination is remediated or
managed by assessing against the respective EPA thresholds and guidelines; and
 Preparation of a final site validation report by a qualified environmental consultant, concluding

that the site has been remediated to allow the proposed development for commercial and
residential purposes.
Detailed Site Investigation P a g e | iv
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 1
1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1
1.3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 1
1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 2
1.5 SCOPE OF W ORKS 2
2. SITE DESCRIPTION 4
2.1 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION, LOCATION AND PHYSICAL SETTING 4
2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USE 4
2.3 REGIONAL SETTING 5
2.4 GROUNDWATER BORE RECORDS AND GROUNDWATER USE 6
2.5 SITE W ALKOVER INSPECTION 6
3. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 8
3.1 OVERVIEW OF REPORTS 8
3.2 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS 8
4. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 11
4.1 CHEMICAL HAZARDS AND CONTAMINATION SOURCES 11
4.2 CHEMICALS OF CONCERN 11
4.3 POTENTIAL SOURCES, EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS 11
4.4 DATA GAPS 13
5. SAMPLING, ANALYTICAL AND QUALITY PLAN (SAQP) 14
5.1 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO) 14
5.2 DATA QUALITY INDICATORS 18
6. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 19
6.1 SAMPLING RATIONALE 19
6.2 INVESTIGATION CONSTRAINTS 19
6.3 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 19
6.4 SOIL INVESTIGATION 21
6.5 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION 22
7. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 25
8. RESULTS 26
8.1 SOIL INVESTIGATION RESULTS 26
8.2 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION RESULTS 27
8.3 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS 28
9. SITE CHARACTERISATION 31
9.1 ASBESTOS RISK 31
9.2 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION 31
9.3 REVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 31
10. CONCLUSIONS 32
11. RECOMMENDATIONS 34
12. STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS 35
REFERENCES
ABBREVIATIONS
Detailed Site Investigation P a g e |v
TABLES (In Text)

TABLE 2-1 SITE IDENTIFICATION, LOCATION AND ZONING 4
TABLE 2-2 SURROUNDING LAND USES 4
TABLE 2-3 REGIONAL SETTING INFORMATION 5
TABLE 3-1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION WORKS AND FINDINGS 8
TABLE 4-1 PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 12
TABLE 5-1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES 15
TABLE 5-2 DATA QUALITY INDICATORS 18
TABLE 6-1 ADOPTED INVESTIGATION LEVELS FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER 20
TABLE 6-2 SUMMARY OF SOIL INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY 21
TABLE 6-3 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY 22
TABLE 8-1 GENERALISED SUBSURFACE PROFILE 26
TABLE 8-2 MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 27
TABLE 8-3 GROUNDWATER FIELD DATA 27
TABLE 8-4 SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS 28
TABLE 8-5 SUMMARY OF UCL CALCULATION 30
TABLES
TABLE T1 SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TABLE T2 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION RESULTS
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 LOCALITY PLAN
FIGURE 2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLANS
APPENDIX B BOREHOLE LOGS
APPENDIX C FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPENDIX D CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND SAMPLE RECEIPT FORMS
APPENDIX E LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
APPENDIX F QA/QC ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX G LABORATORY QA/AC POLICIES AND DQOS
APPENDIX H 95% UCL CALCULATION
Detailed Site Investigation P a g e |1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Mr Zaid Zeino of Donald Cant Watts Cork engaged EI Australia (EI) to conduct a Detailed Site
Investigation (DSI) for site characterisation purposes for a mixed use development, located at 678
Victoria Road, Ryde NSW (‘the site’).
As shown in Figure 1, the site is located approximately 6 km northwest of the Sydney Central
Business District, within the Local Government Area of City of Ryde Council. The site covers an
2
approximate area of 15,894 m (as shown in Figure 2) and is located in the eastern corner portion of
the Lot 1012 in DP 836977 allotment, which covers a total approximate area of 7.71 ha and houses
the greater Calvary Ryde Retirement Community Village.
This report is provided in support of a Development Application (DA) to City of Ryde Council and for
the purpose of enabling the developer to meet its obligations under the Contaminated Land
Management Act 1997 (CLM Act), for the assessment and management of contaminated soil and/or
groundwater.
A Preliminary Site Investigation (Ref. E23061 AA, dated 27 September 2016) and Geotechnical
Assessment Report (Ref. E23061 GA, Dated 29 August 2016) have also being completed by EI for
the site. These documents should be read in conjunction with this report.
1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

Based on the architectural drawings prepared by Boffa Robertson Group Architects, (Project No.
1602, dated March 2017), EI understand that site will be redeveloped as an aged care facility, which
will involving the following works:
 Demolition of the three Mary Potter Nursing Home buildings;

 Conversion of the existing Chapel building into a community centre;
 Construction of a three-storey mixed residential care (RCF) and independent living units (ILU)
building, with a single-level basement for car parking, services and storage; and
 Development of gardens and green open space areas, with two driveways surrounding the
building.
Proposed land uses for the site are classed as residential, with basement car parking, recreational
open spaces and driveways, surrounding the building footprint area. Site drawings of the proposed
development are included in Appendix A.
1.3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

The following regulatory framework and guidelines were considered during the preparation of this
report:
 ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine
Water Quality;
 DECCW (2009) Guidelines for Implementing the Protection of the Environment Operations
(Underground Petroleum Storage Systems) Regulation 2008, (UPSS Guidelines);
 DEC (2007) Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Groundwater Contamination;
 EPA (1995) Sampling Design Guidelines;
 EPA (2014) Technical Note: Investigation of Service Station Sites;
 NEPC (2013) Schedule B(1) Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater;
 NEPC (2013) Schedule B(2) Guideline on Site Characterisation;
 Contaminated Land Management Act 1997;
 State Environment Protection Policy 55 (SEPP 55) – Remediation of Land, and
 OEH (2011) Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites.
1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives of this investigation were to:
 Review of the PSI (EI, 2016) for the site which assessed the potential for contamination on the
basis of historical land uses, anecdotal and documentary evidence of possible pollutant
sources;
 To investigate the degree of any potential contamination by means of limited intrusive sampling
and laboratory analysis, for relevant contaminants;
 Evaluate potential risks that identified impacts may pose to human health and the environment;
and
 Where site contamination is confirmed, make recommendations for the appropriate

management of any contaminated soils and/or groundwater.
1.5 SCOPE OF WORKS

In order to achieve the above objectives the scope of works was as follows:
1.5.1 Desktop Study

 Review of the previous PSI (EI, 2016);
 Review of existing underground services on site.
 A review of relevant topographical, geological, hydrogeological and soil landscape maps for the
project area;
1.5.2 Field Work & Laboratory Analysis

 A detailed site walkover inspection;
 Drilling of boreholes at twenty five(25) locations (BH101 to BH125) across accessible areas of
the site;
 Installation of three (3) groundwater monitoring well to a maximum depth of 9.0 m (or prior
refusal), constructed to standard environmental protocols to investigate potential groundwater
contamination;
 Multiple level soil sampling within fill and natural soils and one round of groundwater sampling
from the constructed groundwater monitoring well; and
 Laboratory analysis of selected soil and groundwater samples for relevant analytical
parameters as determined from the site history survey and field observations during the
investigation programme.
1.5.3 Data Analysis and Reporting

A DSI report would also be prepared to document desk study findings, the conceptual site model,
data quality objectives, investigation methodologies and results. The report would also provide a
record of observations made during the detailed site walkover inspection, borehole and monitoring
well construction logs and a discussion of laboratory analytical results in regards to potential risks to
human health, the environment and the aesthetic uses of the land.
2. SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION, LOCATION AND PHYSICAL SETTING
The site identification details and associated information are presented in Table 2-1, while the site
locality is shown in Figure 1.
Table 2-1 Site Identification, Location and Zoning
Attribute Description
Street Address 678 Victoria Road, Ryde NSW
Location Description The site covers an irregular shaped area bounded by Victoria Road to the north,
The Gardens high-rise residential development to the east and south, with the
existing Calvary Ryde Retirement Community to the west.
Approximate coordinates for the eastern corner of the site under GDA94-MGA56
are: Easting: 325277.602, Northing: 6256527.518
(Source: http://maps.six.nsw.gov.au).
2
Site Investigation Area Approx. 15,894 m
Lot and Deposited Plan (DP) The site is located in the eastern corner (part) of Lot 1012 DP 836977
State Survey Marks The nearest State Survey (SS) mark, SS166804, is located approximately 200 m
south of the eastern corner of the site, and 20 m south-east of the eastern site
boundary in Wallumai Place.
(Source: http://maps.six.nsw.gov.au).
Local Government Authority City of Ryde Council
Parish Hunters Hill
County Cumberland
Current Zoning R2 – Low Density Residential
(Ryde Local Environment Plan, 2014)
Current Land Uses Aged care facility
2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USE

The site is situated within an area of mixed land uses and current uses. Current uses of surrounding
land are described in Table 2-2.
Table 2-2 Surrounding Land Uses
Direction Land Use Description Sensitive Receptors (&

distance from site)
North Victoria Road, then a car parking facility and low-density Residential homes (approx. 30
residential properties beyond. m away from the site)
South High to low density residential uses and high-rise residential Residential flat dwellings
apartment buildings. adjacent to the south boundary.
East A motor vehicle sales yard. Residential units (immediately
adjacent to the site)
West Hyson Green, recreational space and the existing residential Residential units (immediately
buildings of the Calvary Ryde Retirement Community. west of the site)
2.3 REGIONAL SETTING

Regional topography, geology, soil landscape and hydrogeological information are summarised in
Table 2-3.
Table 2-3 Regional Setting Information
Topography The regional topography slopes gently (around 5 – 15 degrees) towards Burrows
Park, the nearest part of which is located about 200 m northeast of the site.
Site Drainage As the site was somewhat sealed by overlying buildings, driveways and concrete
slab walkways at the time of investigation, stormwater was expected to drain via a
network of sealed, onsite drains gutters to the municipal stormwater system. Excess
run-off is expected to enter street gutters on nearby streets in the form of overland
flow.
It is anticipated that stormwater collected in the area ultimately drains to Buffalo
Creek, which is located about 230 m northeast of the site.
Regional Geology Information on regional sub-surface conditions, referenced from the Department of
Mineral Resources Geological Map Sydney 1:100,000 Geological Series Sheet 9130
(DMR 1983) indicates the site to be underlain by Ashfield Shale. Ashfield Shale
consists of black to dark grey shale and laminite. This map profile does not take into
account the soil derived from in-situ weathering of the underlying rock and any filling
that have previously been undertaken at the site and its surrounds.
Soil Landscapes The Soil Conservation Service of NSW Soil Landscapes of the Sydney 1:100,000
Sheet (Chapman and Murphy, 2002) indicates that the site overlies an Erosional
Landscape – Glenorie (gy).
The geology comprises of undulating to rolling rises and low hills on Wianamatta
Group shales. Limitations are high soil erosion hazard, localised impermeable highly
plastic subsoil, moderately reactive. Soils are identified as moderately deep Red
Podzolic Soils on crests, moderately deep Red and Brown Podzolic Soils on upper
slopes, deep Yellow Podzolic Soils on lower slopes and Humic Gleys, Yellow
Podzolic Soils and Gleyed Podzolic Soils along drainage lines.
Acid Sulfate Soil Risk The site lies within an area mapped as “No Known Occurrence” of ASS materials on
the Prospect / Parramatta River Acid Sulfate Soil Risk Map Edition Two (1:25,000
scale; Murphy, 1997). The corresponding map class description is “Acid sulfate soils
are not known or expected to occur in these environments”.
Based on the findings of the field investigation, the site was underlain by residual
clay and shale, and failed to demonstrate field indicators for actual or potential ASSs,
as listed in the ASSMAC (1998) manual (Ref. Table 2.3, Section 2, ASSs
Assessment Guidelines). The need for further Acid Sulphate soil management was
therefore considered unwarranted and the risks associated with Acid Sulfate soils
were considered negligible.
Likelihood & Depth of Field observations during intrusive investigation indicated that the thickness of fill /
Filling top soil layer present on site ranged from approximately 0.2 to 3.0 m.
Typical Soil Profile Previous Geotechnical Investigation (Ref .E23061 GA) undertaken by EI on the site
indicated a soil profile of fill (various from 0.2 to 3.0 m) overlying Silty CLAY
(approximately 2.5 to 6.1 m thick). Weathered shale bedrock was encountered at
approximately 7.2 to 10 mBGL.
Depth to Groundwater Previous investigations undertaken by EI (Ref .E23061 GA) on the site indicated a
groundwater levels ranging from 2.0 to 6.5 mBGL.
Nearest Surface Water In view of the local topography, however, the nearest natural surface water body is
Feature & Buffalo Creek, which is located about 230 m north-east of the site and approximately
Inferred groundwater 2 km by stream to Lane Cove River, further to the east.
flow direction Groundwater is inferred to flow to the northeast
2.4 GROUNDWATER BORE RECORDS AND GROUNDWATER USE

An online search of registered groundwater bores was conducted by EI on the 23 February 2017
through the NSW Office of Water (Ref. http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/water.stm). There no
registered bores within about 1 km of the site.
2.5 SITE WALKOVER INSPECTION

EI staff made a number of observations during the PSI (EI, 2016) and similar observations were
made investigation drilling on the 8-10 of February 2017. The recorded observations are summarised
below:
 The site was currently operating as a retirement village, comprising three building structures
scattered across the eastern developed portion of the site. The eastern half of the site was
observed to consist of undeveloped, open green space area.
 Site building structures comprised a one storey building built over a concrete slab-on-grade, of
brick veneer and tiled roof construction to the south-east, and three concrete-rendered with
aluminium roofing, hexagonally shaped buildings to the north-east. Structures were observed to
be well maintained and in good condition.
 Site observations indicated the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACM) within the eaves
throughout the hexagonally shaped buildings and on the panels above the windows on the brick
veneer building facing O’Regan Avenue. Other hazardous materials observed included
fluorescent light fittings, air conditioning units and hot water systems found close to exterior
building structures.
 A stormwater storage tank was situated on the eastern side of site structures on the deep planting
area next to Hyson Green.
 Two concrete stormwater culverts were noted on the eastern side of the site on the undeveloped
grassland area, stagnant water was noted to be ponding at the end of the drainage systems.
 As the site sloped generally to the north-east, various areas of the site associated with site
structures and the main site driveway were observed to be benched, indicating appreciable filling
of parts of the site. It is uncertain as to whether this material was sourced directly from the site, or
has been imported as backfill for the establishment of site grades.
 The laundry of the retirement village was situated on the southern building of the site, five
commercial large capacity (100 kg) washing machines / dryers were observed with associated
vent pipes. The use of dry-cleaning or other solvent chemicals could not be determined during
the site visit.
 Observations identified general waste bins situated on the western side of the grassland area off
O’Regan Avenue, and clinical waste skip bins on the loading dock adjacent to the southern
hexagonally shaped building.
 Some minor filling was also noted east of the Hyson Green area and beneath deep planting areas
adjacent to building structures.
 O’Regan Avenue was paved with asphaltic-concrete and was generally in good condition, with
minimal cracking and deformation observed. Some minor, localised, surficial oil staining was
observed on car park surfaces along the main access driveway.
 A sewer main traversing the site was noted to the north of the site off O’Regan Avenue.
 Evidence of underground petroleum storage systems (UPSS) was not observed during the site
walkover on any part of the site.
Photographs from the site walkover from the PSI can be viewed in the PSI report (EI, 2016).
3. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
3.1 OVERVIEW OF REPORTS
Previous environmental investigation of the site was recorded under the report:
 Stage 1 Environmental Site Assessment, 642-678 Victoria Road and 82 Princes Street, Ryde
NSW (EIS, Ref E28051kPrpt, dated 25 February 2015).
 Preliminary Site Investigation, 678 Victoria Road, Ryde NSW (EI Australia, Ref E23061, dated 27
September 2016).
3.2 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS
Table 3-1 Summary of Previous Investigation Works and Findings
Assessment Details Project Tasks and Findings
EIS (2015) Stage 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
Work Objectives The objective of the Stage 1 ESA:

 Identify past and present potentially contaminating activities and potential
contamination sources;
 Identify potential contamination types (i.e. potential contaminants of concern –PCC);
 Prepare a preliminary conceptual site model (PCSM); and
 Provide a preliminary assessment of the potential for site contamination and a
discussion of the potential contamination-related constraints at the site.
Areas of Environmental There are some areas of environmental concern outlined by EIS. The following are:
Concern  Fill Material: Ares of the site appear to be used to achieve existing levels. The
sources of these materials are unknown. The fill may have been imported from
various sources and can contain elevated concentrations of contaminants.
 Former Agricultural Land Use: The site has been used as market garden or
agricultural purposes between the early 1900s and 1960s. The use of pesticides
during this period could have resulted in potential contamination.
 Hazardous Building Material: The aerial photographs indicate that former buildings
constructed in the early 1900s at the site were demolished in the 1990s. The use of
hazardous building material in the former buildings could have resulted in potential
contamination.
Discussion and EIS Consider that the assessment objectives have been addressed.
Conclusions Based on the scope of work undertaken, EIS provide the following conclusions:
 EIS consider that the areas of concern identified at the site pose a potential
contamination risk. Based on the limited information, EIS assess the risk to be low to
moderate; and
 The potential risk to the site receptors cannot be ruled out without undertaking an
intrusive investigation.
EIS note that the site has been used for agricultural purposes and has included filling at
the very least to create building platforms. Both of these issues will require further
investigation.
There remains a risk of asbestos at the site associated with former building demolition
works. Further investigation of this issue will be required.
Off-site disposal of soil/fill is likely to be required as part of the proposed development
works. A waste classification assessment will be required to classify this material for
disposal.
EIS consider the site can be made suitable for the prosed aged care developed provided
the following additional work is undertaken to better assess the risks:
 Undertake an intrusive ESA in accessible areas of the site including targeting
specific areas of concerns; and
 Undertake a waste classification assessment for the off-site disposal of material
excavated for the proposed development.
EI (2016) Preliminary Site Investigation
Work Objectives The primary objective of this PSI was to provide a qualitative assessment of the
environmental conditions of the site, by appraising the potential for site contamination on
the basis of field observations, historical land uses, and previous environmental
investigation findings, anecdotal and historical documentary evidence.
Scope of Works  A review of relevant hydrogeological and soil landscape maps for the site and
surrounding areas;
 A review of a previous Phase 1 Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment;
 Search of historical aerial photographs archived at NSW Land and Property
Information in order to review previous site use and potential, historical sources of
contamination;
 A search through the NSW EPA / Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) Land
Information records to confirm that there are no statutory notices current on the site
under the Contaminated Land Management Act (1997) or Protection of the
Environment Operations Act (1997);
 Detailed site walkover inspection that was conducted across the site, including
inspection of the existing building structures for the presence of hazardous building
materials,
 Preparation of a PSI report to document all works conducted, including field
observations, records search and data review findings, with a preliminary
assessment of potential areas of environmental concern in regards to risks to human
health, the environment and the aesthetic enjoyment of the land.
Detailed Site Investigation P a g e | 10
Findings  Historical land uses included agricultural activities, imported filling from unknown
sources, and potential storage and handling of cleaning chemicals, which may have
contributed contamination to the site;
 No evidence was found to indicate the presence of underground storage tanks
(USTs) on the site;
 The site and surrounding properties are not reported as being subject to regulation in
relation to any environmental impacts, based on searches of the NSW EPA/OEH
public registers;
 A search through SafeWork NSW records relating to historical storage of hazardous
chemicals revealed that no records pertaining to the site were held;
 A number of areas of potential concern were identified during a detailed site
walkover inspection, as follows:
 Potential presence of fill materials imported from unknown off-site source(s) and
containing soils of unknown quality; and
 Presence of hazardous building materials, including asbestos-containing materials
within building structures and fittings, potential lead-based paints and electrical
capacitors containing PCBs.
 The site is located in an area where Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) are not known to occur.
 Based on the findings of this PSI, EI considers that further investigation is warranted
to characterise environmental conditions and site suitability for the proposed land
uses of residential and recreational open space.
Recommendations
The following recommendations are provided to enable the assessment of site
suitability for the proposed residential and recreational open space land uses:
 A Hazardous Materials Survey (HMS) should be carried out on the existing

structures prior to the commencement of site works. The HMS should be
prepared to assist with the development of appropriate control measures that
may need to be employed during the proposed works to protect workers’ health
and to prevent spreading of hazardous materials, which may result in residual
contaminant levels in site soils.
 A Detailed Site Investigation (DSI) involving small diameter manual auger

drilling, sampling of fill and natural soil at systematically distributed, grid-based
locations, with laboratory analysis to characterise subsurface environmental
conditions, thus addressing the data gaps identified by this PSI.
 Should DSI findings indicate the presence of contaminants in soil, groundwater

sampling and a risk assessment may be recommended to determine if the
identified concentrations pose a risk to site users and/or the surrounding
environment. Should unacceptable risk(s) be determined to exist, then remedial
action will be recommended, commencing with the preparation of a site-specific
site remedial action plan (RAP).
 Should the DSI fail to identify evidence of soil and/or soil vapour impacts, a clear
concluding statement may be provided in the DSI report to indicate the suitability
of the site for commercial/residential land use. In this case the report may be
attached to a development application to City of Ryde Council, in support for the
proposed development.
 Any materials being removed from the site during the course of site
redevelopment should be classified for off-site disposal in accordance with the
EPA (2014) Waste Classification Guidelines.
Should future modifications to the development proposal require ground excavation
and / or groundwater dewatering, then a Groundwater Dewatering Management Plan
to guide the management of groundwater during basement construction, if required.
4. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

In accordance with NEPM (2013) Schedule B2 – Guideline on Site Characterisation and to aid in the
assessment of data collection for the site, EI previously developed a preliminary conceptual site
model (CSM) in the PSI (EI, 2016), assessing plausible pollutant linkages between potential
contamination sources, migration pathways and receptors. The CSM provides a framework for the
review of the reliability and useability of the data collected and to identify data gaps in the existing site
characterisation.
4.1 CHEMICAL HAZARDS AND CONTAMINATION SOURCES

On the basis of site history and search findings (summarised in Section 3), EI consider potential
chemical hazards and onsite contamination sources to be as follows:
 Fill of unknown origin and quality imported to the site and used as backfill;
 Hazardous building materials within existing site structures;
 Potential use of cleaning products; and
 Application of pesticides during agricultural activities and beneath the building slab and at the
perimeter of buildings.
4.2 CHEMICALS OF CONCERN

Based on the findings of the site contamination appraisal the chemicals of concern (COC) at the site
are considered to be:
 Soil – heavy metals (HMs), total recoverable hydrocarbons (TRH), polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), the monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (MAH) compounds benzene,
toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX), organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides
(OCP/ OPP), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), phenols, and asbestos.
 Groundwater – HMs, TRH, BTEX, PAH and volatile organic compounds (VOC), including
chlorinated VOC (VOCC).
4.3 POTENTIAL SOURCES, EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS

Potential contamination sources, exposure pathways and human and environmental receptors that
were considered relevant for this assessment are summarised along with a qualitative assessment of
the potential risks posed by complete exposure pathways in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model
Potential Potential Sensitive Receptor Migration & Potential Risk of

Sources Contaminants Exposure Complete Exposure
Pathways Pathway
Imported Fill HM, TRH, PAH, Site Workers during Dermal Contact Low to Moderate
BTEX, demolition and construction Ingestion
OCP/OPP, PCB, Future site residents
Phenols, Inhalation
Asbestos Adjacent land users
Groundwater Seepage into the Low

subsurface soils,
bedrock, and
groundwater.
Pesticide Use HM, OCP/OPP Site Workers during Dermal Contact Low to Moderate
demolition and construction Ingestion
Future site residents Inhalation
Groundwater Seepage into the Low

subsurface soils,
bedrock, and
groundwater.
Surfaces on HM, Asbestos Site Workers during Dermal Contact Low

existing demolition and construction Ingestion
structures Future site residents Inhalation
Adjacent site users
Groundwater HM seepage into Low

the subsurface
soils, bedrock, and
groundwater.
Deleterious Lead, Asbestos, Site Workers during Dermal Contact Moderate

materials Synthetic demolition and construction Ingestion
within the Mineral Fibres, Future site residents
existing PCBs Inhalation
structures Adjacent site users
Offsite HM, TRH, Site Workers during Dermal Contact Low to Moderate
Contamination BTEX, PAH, demolition and Ingestion
BTEX, VOC remediation.
Inhalation
Future site residents
Adjacent site users
Groundwater Seepage into the Low to Moderate

subsurface soils,
bedrock, and
groundwater.
4.4 DATA GAPS

Based on information from the site walkover inspection and site history review, EI consider a
programme of intrusive investigation is required to address the following data gaps:
 Potential presence of onsite contamination from identified sources (as listed in Section 4.1);
 The degree and extent of onsite contamination, if any; and
 Potential presence of any contamination from unknown onsite and offsite sources.
The data gaps identified above are addressed in the following DSI sections.
5. SAMPLING, ANALYTICAL AND QUALITY PLAN (SAQP)

The SAQP plays a crucial role in ensuring that the data collected as part of this, and ongoing
environmental works carried out at the site are representative, and provide a robust basis for site
assessment decisions. This SAQP includes the following:
 Data quality objectives, including a summary of the objectives of the ESA;
 Investigation methodology including media to be sampled, details of analytes and parameters

to be monitored and a description of intended sampling points;
 Sampling methods and procedures;
 Field screening methods;
 Analysis Methods;
 Sample handling, preservation and storage; and
 Analytical QA/QC.
5.1 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO)

In accordance with the US EPA (2006) Data Quality Assessment and the DEC (2006) Guidelines for
the NSW Site Auditor Scheme, the process of developing Data Quality Objectives (DQO) was used by
the EI assessment team to determine the appropriate level of data quality needed for the specific data
requirements of the project. The DQO process that was applied for this assessment is documented in
Table 5-1.
Table 5-1 Summary of Project Data Quality Objectives
DQO Steps (NSW DEC, 2006) Details
1. State the Problem  The site is to be developed into an aged care facility classed as residential, with basement car parking, recreational
Summarise the contamination problem that will open spaces and driveways, surrounding the building footprint area.
require new environmental data, and identify the  Historical information and site inspection observations (EIS, 2015 and EI, 2016) identified the potential for
resources available to resolve the problem; contamination to be present in the soil and/or groundwater, contributed by uses onsite (Section 4.1).
develop a conceptual site model
 A preliminary conceptual model has been developed, and is present in Section 3.
 The investigation sampling must provide supportive information on the environmental conditions of the site to
determine the site’s suitability for the proposed development.
2. Identify the Goal of the Study (Identify the Based on the objectives outlined in Section 1.4, the decisions that need to be made are
decisions)  Has the nature, extent and source of any soil, vapour and/or groundwater impacts onsite been defined?
Identify the decisions that need to be made on  What impact do the site specific, geological, and hydrogeological conditions have on the fate and transport of any
the contamination problem and the new impacts that may be identified?
environmental data required to make them
 Does the level of impact coupled with the fate and transport of identified contaminants represent an unacceptable risk
to identified human and/or environmental receptors on or offsite?
 Does the collected data provide sufficient information to allow the selection and design of an appropriate remedial
strategy, if necessary?
3. Identify Information Inputs (Identify inputs Inputs to the decision making process include:
to decision)  Qualitative site information presented in EIS (2015) and EI (2016);
Identify the information needed to support any  Areas of concern identified during the site inspection prior to intrusive investigations;
decision and specify which inputs require new
environmental measurements  National and NSW EPA guidelines endorsed under the NSW Contaminated Land Management Act 1997;
 The investigation scope of works, present in Section 1.5;
 Intrusive investigation and soil and groundwater sampling to verify the presence of onsite contamination and to
evaluate the potential risks to sensitive receptors; and
 Laboratory analysis of collected soils and groundwater samples.
At the end of the assessment, a decision must be made regarding whether the soils and groundwater are suitable for the
proposed development, or if additional investigation or remedial works are required to make the site suitable.
4. Define the Boundaries of the Study  Lateral – The works will be conducted within the site investigation area demarcated in Figure 2, located with the
Specify the spatial and temporal aspects of the allotment cadastral site boundaries;
environmental media that the data must  Vertical – From existing ground surface, underlying fill and natural soil horizons, and the underlying water-bearing
represent to support decision zone, to a maximum depth of 8.5 mBGL; and
 Temporal – Results are valid on the day of data and sample collection and remain valid as long as no changes occur
on site or contamination (if present) does not migrate on site or on to the site from off-site sources
5. Develop the Analytic Approach (Develop a The decision rules for the investigation were:
decision rule)  If the concentrations of contaminants in the soil and/or groundwater data exceed the land use criteria; then assess the
To define the parameter of interest, specify the need to further investigate the extent of impacts on site; and
action level, and integrate previous DQO outputs  Decision criteria for QA/QC measures are defined by the Data Quality Indicators (DQI) in Table 5-2.
into a single statement that describes a logical
basis for choosing from alternative actions
6. Specify Performance or Acceptance Specific limits for this project are to be in accordance with the National and NSW EPA guidance, and appropriate indicators
Criteria (Specify limits on decision errors) of data quality and standard procedures for field sampling and handling. This should include the following points to quantify
Specify the decision-maker’s acceptable limits on tolerable limits:
decision errors, which are used to establish  The null hypothesis for the investigation is that:
performance goals for limiting uncertainties in the  The 95 % Upper Confidence Limits (UCL) of the mean for contaminants of concern exceed relevant residential,
data recreational, or commercial / industrial land use criteria across the site.
 Sampling on a 25 m grid will allow detection of a circular hotspot with a nominal diameter of 29.5 m with 95 %
certainty;
 The acceptance of the site will be based on the probability that
 The 95 % UCL of the mean of the data will satisfy the given site criteria. Therefore a limit on the decision error will
be 5 % that a conclusive statement may be incorrect; and
 The standard deviation of the results is less than 50% of the relevant remediation acceptance criterion; and
 No single results exceeds the remediation acceptance criteria by 250 % or more; and
 Soil concentrations for chemicals of concern that are below investigation criteria made or approved by the NSW EPA
will be treated as acceptable and indicative of suitability for the proposed land use(s); and
 If contaminant concentrations in groundwater exceed the adopted criteria, further investigation will be considered
prudent. If no contamination is detected in groundwater, further action will not be warranted.

2
7. Develop the Detailed Plan for Obtaining  Based on the site area (15,894 m ) twenty five sampling points will be completed (as per NEPM, 2013).
Data (Optimise the design for obtaining data)
 Soil sampling locations were set using a systematic sampling pattern across the accessible areas of the site.
Identify the most resource-effective sampling and
 An upper soil profile sample (soil extracted immediately beneath the concrete hardstand / pavement / ground level) will
analysis design for general data that are
be collected at each borehole location and tested for chemicals of concern, to assess the conditions of fill layer, and
expected to satisfy the DQOs
impacts from activities above ground. Further sampling would also be carried out at deeper soil layers. These samples
would be selected for testing based on field observations (including visual and olfactory evidence, as well as soil
vapour screening in headspace samples) whilst giving consideration to characterise the subsurface soil stratigraphy.
 Three groundwater monitoring wells would be installed to characterise groundwater quality within the site.
 Written instructions will be issued to guide field personnel in the required fieldwork activities.
5.2 DATA QUALITY INDICATORS

To ensure that the investigation data collected was of an acceptable quality, the investigation data set
was assessed against the data quality indicators (DQI) outlined in Table 5-2, which related to both
field and laboratory-based procedures. The assessment of data quality is discussed in Section 7.
Table 5-2 Data Quality Indicators
Data Quality Data Quality Indicator Acceptable Range

Objective
Accuracy Field – Trip blank (laboratory prepared) < laboratory limit of reporting
Laboratory – Laboratory control spike and matrix spike (LOR)
Prescribed by the laboratories
Precision Field – Blind replicate and spilt duplicate < 30 % relative percentage
Laboratory – Laboratory duplicate and matrix spike difference (RPD [%])
duplicate Prescribed by the laboratories
Representativeness Field – Trip blank (laboratory prepared) < laboratory limit of reporting
Laboratory – Method blank (LOR)
Prescribed by the laboratories
Completeness Completion (%) -

6. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
6.1 SAMPLING RATIONALE
With reference to the preliminary CSM described in Section 4, soil and groundwater investigation
works were planned in accordance with the following rationale:
 Sampling of fill and natural soils at twenty five (25) test bore locations located systematically
across the site using a grid-based sampling pattern to characterise in-situ soils to assess the
presence of soil contamination;
 Sampling groundwater during a single groundwater monitoring event (GME) at three (3)
monitoring wells located close to the up gradient and down gradient site boundaries, to assess
for potential groundwater impacts; and
 Laboratory analysis of representative soil and groundwater samples for the identified chemicals
of concern.
6.2 INVESTIGATION CONSTRAINTS

The number of test bores drilled during the investigation phase did not achieve the planned
investigation scope due to a number of physical obstructions, which comprised:
 Limited access to internal areas of the existing buildings; and
 Limited head-clearance for the mechanical drilling rig.
6.3 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

The assessment criteria proposed for this project are outlined in Table 6-1. These were selected from
available published guidelines that are endorsed by national or state regulatory authorities, with due
consideration of the exposure scenario that is expected for various parts of the site, the likely
exposure pathways and the identified potential receptors.
Table 6-1 Adopted Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater
Environmental Adopted Rationale

Media Guidelines
Soil NEPM, 2013 Soil Health-based Investigation Levels (HILs)

Soil HILs, EILs, Samples are to be assessed against the NEPM 2013 HIL-B
HSLs, ESLs & thresholds for residential sites with minimal opportunities for soil
Management access.
Limits for TPHs Soil Health-based Screening Levels (HSLs)
The NEPM 2013 Soil HSL-A&B thresholds for residential sites for
vapour intrusion would be applied to assess for potential human
health impacts from residual vapours resulting from petroleum,
BTEX, and Naphthalene.
WADOH (2009) assessment criteria, as presented in NEPC
(2013) were not adopted as part of this investigation. For
preliminary asbestos screening performed as part of this
investigation the limit of reporting (LOR) of <0.01 w/w%, and
presence / absence of asbestos reported by the analytical
laboratory, are adopted.
Management Limits for Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Should the ESLs and HSLs be exceeded for petroleum
hydrocarbons, soil samples would also assessed against the
NEPM 2013 Management Limits for the TRH fractions F1 – F4 to
assess propensity for phase-separated hydrocarbons (PSH), fire
and explosive hazards & adverse effects on buried infrastructure
Ecological Investigation Levels (EILs)
Soil samples are also assessed against the NEPM 2013 EILs for
arsenic, copper, chromium (III), nickel, lead, zinc, DDT and
naphthalene, which have been derived for protection of terrestrial
ecosystems. EILs only apply to the top 2 m of soil (root zone).
Most conservative values were adopted
Ecological Screening Levels (ESLs)
Soil samples are assessed against the NEPM 2013 ESLs for
selected petroleum hydrocarbons & TRH fractions for protection
of terrestrial ecosystems. ESLs only apply to the top 2m of soil
(root zone).
Groundwater NEPM, 2013 GILs Groundwater Investigation Levels (GILs) for Marine Water
for Marine Waters NEPM 2013 provides GILs for typical, slightly-moderately
Groundwater HSLs disturbed aquatic ecosystems, which are based on the ANZECC
for Vapour & ARMCANZ 2000 Trigger Values (TVs) for the 95% level of
Intrusion protection of aquatic ecosystems; however, the 99% TVs were
applied for the bio-accumulative metals cadmium and mercury.
The marine criteria were considered relevant as the closest
potential surface water receptor was Buffalo Creek with leads to
the Lane Cover river which is tidal and a marine ecosystem. .
Due to the ANZECC (2000) criteria for petroleum hydrocarbons
being below the laboratory limit of reporting, the PQL for each
TRH fraction was adopted as the GIL for aquatic ecosystems, as
per the guidance provided in DEC (2007) Guidelines for the
Assessment and Management of Groundwater Contamination.
Health-based Screening Levels (HSLs)
The NEPM 2013 groundwater HSLs for vapour intrusion were
used to assess for potential human health impacts from residual
vapours resulting from petroleum, BTEX and naphthalene
impacts. The HSL A thresholds for residential sites were applied
for groundwater.
For the purposes of this investigation, the adopted soil assessment criteria are referred to as the Soil
Investigation Levels (SILs) and the adopted groundwater assessment criteria are referred to as the
Groundwater Investigation Levels (GILs). SILs and GILs are presented alongside the analytical
results in the corresponding summary tables, which are discussed in Section 8.
6.4 SOIL INVESTIGATION

The soil investigation works conducted at the site are described in Table 6-2. Test bore locations are
illustrated in Figure 2.
Table 6-2 Summary of Soil Investigation Methodology
Activity/Item Details
Fieldwork The site investigation was conducted on 8-10 of February 2017 and comprised 25
test bores and installation of three groundwater wells.
Drilling Method & All borehole were drilled using a solid flight auger drilling rig, expect for BH103,
Investigation Depth BH107, BH108, BH113, BH114 and BH119, which were hand augured. Final bore
depths of the solid flight boreholes were between 2.0 – 8.5 mBGL and final depths
of the hand augured boreholes were between 0.35 – 1.10 mBGL. BH103, BH107
and BH119 refused in fill material.
Groundwater monitoring well were installed between 6.1 to 8.1 mBGL.
Soil Logging Drilled soils were classified in the field with respect to lithological characteristics
and evaluated on a qualitative basis for odour and visual signs of contamination.
Soil classifications and descriptions were based on Unified Soil Classification
System (USCS) and Australian Standard (AS) 4482.1-2005. Bore logs are
presented in Appendix B.
Field Observations No visual signs of contamination were observed and no suspicious odours were
(including visual and detected in any other the other samples during any stage of the field investigation
olfactory signs of programme.
potential contamination)
Soil Sampling  Soil samples were collected using a dry grab method (unused, dedicated nitrile
gloves) & placed into laboratory-supplied, acid-washed, solvent-rinsed glass
jars.
 Blind field duplicates was separated from the primary samples and placed into
glass jars.
 A small amount of duplicate was collected from each soil samples and placed
into zip-lock bag for Photo-ionisation Detector (PID) screening.
 A small amount of duplicate was separated from all fill samples and placed into
a zip-lock bag for asbestos analysis.
Decontamination Drilling Equipment - The drilling rods were decontaminated between sampling
Procedures locations with potable water until the augers were free of all residual materials.
Sampling Equipment - The stainless steel hand trowel was wiped clean using
unused paper between near-surface sampling points, except where residue was
observed after sampling, in which case the trowel was washed with a potable
water/phosphate-free detergent mixture, then rinsed with potable water and wiped
with unused paper. Sampling gloves were replaced between sampling locations.
Sample Preservation Samples were stored in a refrigerated (ice-filled) chest, whilst on-site and in transit
to the laboratory. All samples were submitted and analysed within the required
holding period, as documented in laboratory reports discussed in a later section.
Management of Soil Soil cuttings were used as backfill for completed boreholes.
Cuttings
Quality Control & A number of soil samples were submitted for analysis of previously-identified
Laboratory Analysis COPC by SGS Laboratories (SGS). QA/QC testing comprised intra-laboratory
duplicates (‘field duplicates’) tested blind by SGS and an inter-laboratory field
duplicate tested blind by Envirolab Services (Envirolab). All samples were
transported under strict Chain-of-Custody (COC) conditions and COC certificates
and laboratory sample receipt documentation were provided to EI for confirmation
purposes.
Soil Vapour Screening To supplement the soil vapour assessment, field screening for potential VOCs in
collected soil headspace samples was conducted using a portable Photo-ionisation
Detector (PID) fitted with a 10.6 eV lamp. PID measurements were recorded in the
field and are presented in the respective summary tables of results and the
borehole logs presented in Appendix B.
6.5 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION

The groundwater investigation works conducted at the site are described in Table 6-3. Monitoring well
locations are illustrated in Figure 2.
Table 6-3 Summary of Groundwater Investigation Methodology
Fieldwork Groundwater monitoring wells were installed and developed on 8-10 February
2017; whereas, water level gauging, well purging, field testing and groundwater
sampling was conducted on 21 February 2017. A previous groundwater monitoring
well was installed by EI (2015) during geotechnical investigations at the site on 5
August 2015.
Well Construction Test bores were converted to groundwater monitoring wells as follows:
 BH105W – drilled to 6.2 m depth, screen length 3.1-6.2 mBGL;
 BH117W – drilled to 8.5 m depth, screen length 5.1 to 8.1 mBGL ; and
 BH120W – drilled to 8.5 m depth, screen length 5.1 to 8.1 mBGL.
Drilled by Geosense using a Hanjin D&B. Well construction details are tabulated in
Table 8-2 and documented in the bore logs presented in Appendix B. Wells were
installed to screen the shale bedrock.
Well Construction Well construction was in general accordance with the standards described in
(continued) NUDLC, 2012 and involved the following:
 50 mm, Class 18 uPVC, threaded, machine-slotted screen and casing, with
slotted intervals in shallow wells set to screen to at least 500 mm above the
standing water level to allow sampling of phase-separated hydrocarbon
product, if present;
 Base and top of each well was sealed with a uPVC cap;
 Annular, graded sand filter was used to approximately 300 mm above top of
screen interval;
 Granular bentonite was applied above annular filter to seal the screened
interval;
 Drill cuttings were used to backfill the bore annulus to just below ground level;
and
 Surface completion comprised a steel road box cover set in neat cement and
finished flush with the concrete slab level.
Well Development Well development was conducted for each well directly following installation. This
involved agitation within the full length of the water column using a dedicated,
HDPE, disposable bailer, followed by removal of water and accumulated sediment
using a 12V, HDPE submersible bore pump (Proactive Environmental, model
Super Twister). Pumping was continued until no further reduction in suspended
sediment was observed (i.e. after removal of several well volumes).
Well Gauging & Inferred Monitoring wells BH105W, BH117W, and BH120W were gauged for standing water
Groundwater Flow level (SWL, depth to groundwater) prior to well purging at the commencement of
Direction the GME on 21 February 2017. All measured SWLs are shown in Table 8-3. A
transparent HDPE bailer was used to visually assess for the presence PSH prior to
the commencement of well purging. PSH was not detected in either well.
Groundwater monitoring wells were not surveyed and therefore an accurate
groundwater flow direction was not established. However based on the site
topography and closest surface water body groundwater is inferred to flow to the
northeast.
Well Purging & Field No volatile organic odours were detected during any stage of well purging.
Testing Measurements of water quality parameters was conducted repeatedly during well
purging and were recorded onto field data sheets (Appendix C) once water quality
parameters stabilised. Field measurements for Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Electrical
Conductivity (EC) and pH of the purged water were also recorded during well
purging. Purged water volumes removed from each well and field test results are
summarised in Table 8-3.
Groundwater sampling Groundwater monitoring wells (BH105W and BH120W) were purged and sampled
using low-flow/minimal drawdown sampling method with a MicroPurge kit (MP15)
and a portable MicroPurge pump following well gauging.
The MicroPurge system incorporates a low density poly-ethylene (LDPE) pump
bladder, and a Teflon-lined LDPE sample delivery tube. The system used for this
investigation employed pressurised carbon dioxide gas to regulate groundwater
flow. Pump pressure and pumping cycles were adjusted accordingly to regulate
extraction flow rate, and to avoid causing excessive drawdown of water level during
the sampling process.
Field measurement of water quality parameters was conducted continuously on
purged groundwater with a water quality meter (Hanna Multi Parameter 9829)
positioned within an open flow-through cell. Groundwater parameters tested in the
field were Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Electrical Conductivity (EC), Redox,
Temperature and pH. The measured parameters were recorded onto a field data
sheet, along with the purged water volume at the time of measurement.
Groundwater sampling was performed when three consecutive readings of
groundwater parameter indicated stabilisation; as per the specified ranges detailed
below:
 Electrical Conductivity: ± 3 % of the read value;
 Redox: ± 20 mV;
 DO: ± 20 % of the read value; and
 pH: ± 0.2 pH unit.
Total water volume purged and stabilised groundwater parameters at each
groundwater monitoring well are summarised in in Table 8-3.
Due to the relatively small volume of water in BH117M, groundwater sample from
BH117M were collected using a transparent, dedicated, HDPE bailer fitted with a
low-flow, discharge valve for sample decanting. The low-flow discharge method is
used to minimise potential loss of volatile compounds; however, no volatile organic
odours were detected during well purging or groundwater sampling.
Decontamination  Decontamination was not required as sampling equipment was stored and
Procedure transported prior to use in factory-sealed, plastic sleeves, while each bailer was
dedicated to each individual well;
 All sample containers were supplied by the laboratory for the particular project
and only opened once immediately prior to sampling;
 While ice was used to keep the samples cool, all melt water was continuously
drained from the Esky to prevent cross-contamination of samples; and
 The water level probe and water quality kit probes were washed in a solution of
potable water and Decon 90 and then rinsed with potable water between
measurements/wells.
Sample Preservation Sample containers were supplied by the laboratory with the following preservatives:
 One, 1 litre amber glass, acid-washed and solvent-rinsed bottle;
 Two, 40 ml glass vials, pre-preserved with dilute hydrochloric acid, Teflon-
sealed; and
 One, 250 mL, HDPE bottle, pre-preserved with dilute nitric acid (1 mL).
Samples for metals analysis were field-filtered using 0.45 µm pore-size filters. All
containers were filled with sample to the brim then capped and stored in ice-filled
chests, until completion of the fieldwork and during sample transit to the laboratory.
Quality Control & All groundwater samples were submitted for analysis of previously-identified
Laboratory Analysis chemicals of concern by SGS Laboratories (SGS). QA/QC testing comprised intra-
laboratory duplicates (‘field duplicates’) tested blind by SGS and an inter-laboratory
field duplicate tested blind by Envirolab Services (Envirolab). All samples were
transported under strict Chain-of-Custody (COC) conditions and COC certificates
and laboratory sample receipt documentation were provided to EI for confirmation
purposes.
Sample Transport After sampling, refrigerated sample chests were transported to SGS Australia Pty
Ltd using strict Chain-of-Custody (COC) procedures. Inter-laboratory duplicate
(ILD) samples were forwarded to Envirolab Services Pty Ltd (Envirolab) for QA/QC
analysis. A Sample Receipt Advice (SRA) was provided by each laboratory to
document sample condition upon receipt. Copies of SRA and COC certificates are
presented in Appendix D.
7. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT

The assessment of data quality is defined as the scientific and statistical evaluation of environmental
data to determine if these data meet the objectives of the project (Ref. USEPA, 2006). Data quality
assessment includes an evaluation of the compliance of the field sampling and laboratory analytical
procedures and an assessment of the accuracy and precision of these data from the laboratory
quality control measurements obtained.
The data quality assessment process for this assessment included a review of analytical procedures
to confirm compliance with established laboratory protocols and an assessment of the accuracy and
precision of analytical data from a range of quality control measurements. The QC measures
generated from the field sampling and analytical program were as follows:
 Suitable records of fieldwork observations including borehole logs;
 Relevant and appropriate sampling plan (density, type, and location);
 Use of approved and appropriate sampling methods;
 Preservation and storage of samples upon collection and during transport to the laboratory;
 Complete field and analytical laboratory sample COC procedures and documentation;
 Sample holding times within acceptable limits;
 Use of appropriate analytical procedures and NATA-accredited laboratories; and
 Required LOR (to allow for comparison with adopted IL);
 Frequency of conducting quality control measurements;
 Laboratory blanks;
 Field duplicates;
 Laboratory duplicates;
 Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs);
 Surrogates (or System Monitoring Compounds);
 Analytical results for replicated samples, including field and laboratory duplicates and inter-
laboratory duplicates, expressed as Relative Percentage Difference (RPD); and
 Checking for the occurrence of apparently unusual or anomalous results, e.g. laboratory results
that appear to be inconsistent with field observations or measurements.
The findings of the data quality assessment in relation to the soil investigations at the site are
discussed in detail in Appendix F. QA/QC policies and DQOs are presented in Appendix G.
On the basis of the analytical data validation procedure employed the overall quality of the soil
analytical data produced for the site were considered to be of an acceptable standard for interpretive
use.
8. RESULTS
8.1 SOIL INVESTIGATION RESULTS
8.1.1 Site Geology and Subsurface Conditions
The general site geology encountered during the drilling of the soil investigation boreholes and
installation of monitoring wells may be described as a layer of anthropogenic filling overlying cohesive
residual soils, with Ashfield Shale at depth. The geological information obtained during the
investigation is summarised in Table 8-1 and borehole logs from these works are presented in
Appendix B.
Table 8-1 Generalised Subsurface Profile
Layer Description Depth to top & bottom of

layer (mBGL)
Surface Asphalt 0.00 - 0.07
Concrete 0.00 - 0.18
Fill Silty CLAY; low to medium plasticity, pale brown, brown, pale red- 0.00 - 3.50
pale grey, pale red mottled grey, brown, mottled red, with some fine,
fine grained sand and extremely weathered shale fragments, sub-
angular to angular gravels and rootlets.
Gravelly SAND; fine grained, pale brown/pale grey, grey, red/brown, 0.07 - 1.80
with fine to coarse, sub-angular gravels.
SAND; medium to coarse grained, grey. 3.50 - 4.10+
Sandy CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown, sand is fine grained. 0.17 - 0.40
Silty Gravelly CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown, brown, with fine 0.00 - 1.40
to coarse, sub-angular to angular gravels and rootlets.
Silty SAND; fine grained, pale brown, brown, trace of low to medium 0.00 - 0.80
plasticity clay and fine, with sub-angular gravels and rootlets.
Silty Sandy CLAY; low to medium plasticity 1.80 - 2.90
Residual Silty Sandy CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown, with fine grained 0.4 - 0.5
Soil sand and extremely weathered shale fragments.
Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red to grey, red/brown 0.30 - 5.20
mottled red/grey, red/brown-pale brown, with shale fragments.
Bedrock SHALE; pale brown to pale grey, grey, inferred extremely 0.50 - 8.50+
weathered.
Notes:
+ Termination depth of borehole
8.1.2 Field Observations and PID Results

Soil samples were obtained from the test bores at various depths ranging between 0.1 to 4.1 mBGL.
All examined soil samples were evaluated on a qualitative basis for odour and visual signs of
contamination (e.g. hydrocarbon odours, oil staining, petrochemical filming, asbestos fragments, ash,
charcoal, etc.) and the following observations were noted:
 No visual or olfactory evidence of hydrocarbon impacts were noted at any of the borehole
locations investigated during this assessment;
 No fibrous cement sheeting, ash, charcoal, or slag was observed in any of the examined fill
soils; and
 VOC concentrations ranging from 0.7 to 5.3 parts per million (ppm) were detected in soil
samples which were field-screened using a portable PID fitted with a 10.9 eV lamp. The PID
results are shown in the borehole logs (Appendix B).
8.2 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION RESULTS
8.2.1 Monitoring Well Construction

Three groundwater monitoring wells were installed in a triangular pattern at the site (BH105W,
BH117W and BH120W). Well construction details for the installed groundwater monitoring wells are
summarised in Table 8-2.
Table 8-2 Monitoring Well Construction Details
Well ID Drilled Bore Depth (mBGL) Screen Interval (mBGL) Lithology Screened
BH105W 6.2 3.1-6.1 SHALE
BH117W 8.50 5.1-8.1 SHALE
BH120W 8.50 5.1-8.1 SHALE
Notes:
mBGL - metres below ground level.
8.2.2 Field Observations and Water Test Results

A GME was conducted on all wells in 21 February 2017. On this date, standing water levels (SWLs)
were measured within each well prior to well purging, the results of which were recorded with well
purge volumes and field-based water test results. It is important to know water quality parameters
were not taken for BH117W due to low volume of water in the well. A summary of the recorded field
data is presented in Table 8-3 and copies of the completed Field Data Sheets are included in
Appendix C.
Table 8-3 Groundwater Field Data
Well ID SWL Purge DO Field Field EC Temp Redox Turbidity/ Odours

o
(mBTOC) Volume (L) (mg/L) pH (S/cm) ( C) (mV)
BH105W 4.116 0.5 1.23 5.17 2,890 34.38 108.5 Low to Medium
Turbidity/ No
Odour
BH117W 8.815 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA Low to Medium

Turbidity/ No
Odour
Well ID SWL Purge DO Field Field EC Temp Redox Turbidity/ Odours

o
(mBTOC) Volume (L) (mg/L) pH (S/cm) ( C) (mV)
BH120W 6.391 0.5 1.81 5.91 1,584 25.39 70.2 Low to Medium
Turbidity/ No
Odour
Notes:
GME – Groundwater monitoring event.
SWL – Standing Water Levels as measured from TOC (top of well casing) prior to groundwater sampling.
mBTOC – metres below top of well casing.
RL (TOC) – Reduced Level, elevation at TOC in metres relative to Australian Height Datum (mAHD).
L – litres (referring to volume of water purged from the well prior to groundwater sample collection).
EC – groundwater electrical conductivity as measured onsite using portable EC meter.
S/cm – micro Siemens per centimetre (EC units).
DO – Dissolved Oxygen in units of milligrams per litre (mg/L)
NA – Not Analysed
All groundwater parameters (pH, EC and DO) were tested on site.
With reference to Table 8-3, the field pH data indicated that the groundwater was slightly acidic (pH
ranged from 5.17 to 5.91). Electrical Conductivity (EC) measurements were recorded in the range
1,584 to 2,890 µS/cm indicating that the groundwater was marginal in terms of water salinity.
8.3 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
8.3.1 Soil Analytical Results

A summary of laboratory results showing test sample quantities, minimum/maximum analyte
concentrations and samples found to exceed the SILs, is presented in Table 8-4. More detailed
tabulations of results showing the tested concentrations for individual samples alongside the adopted
soil criteria are presented in Tables T1 at the end of this report. Completed documentation used to
track soil sample movements and laboratory receipt (i.e. COC and SRA forms) are copied in
Appendix D and all laboratory analytical reports for tested soil samples are presented in Appendix E.
Table 8-4 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
No. of primary Analyte Min. Conc. Max. Conc. Sample locations exceeding
samples (mg/kg) (mg/kg) investigation levels
Hydrocarbons
45 F1 TRH C6–C10 <25 <25
45 F2 TRH >C10–C16 <25 100
45 F3 TRH >C16–C34 <90 220
45 F4 TRH >C34–C40 <120 <120
45 Benzene <0.1 <0.1
45 Toluene <0.1 <0.1
45 Ethyl benzene <0.1 <0.1
45 Total xylenes <0.3 <0.3
45 Benzo(a)pyrene <0.1 1.0 Sample Exceeding EIL Criteria:
BH122_0.1-0.2 (1 mg/kg)
OCPs
24 Aldrin & Dieldrin <0.3 <0.3
24 Chlordane <0.1 <0.1
24 DDT+DDD+DDE <0.6 <0.6
No. of primary Analyte Min. Conc. Max. Conc. Sample locations exceeding
samples (mg/kg) (mg/kg) investigation levels
24 Heptachlor <0.1 <0.1
Heavy Metal
45 Arsenic <3 10
45 Cadmium <0.3 0.6
45 Chromium (Total) 74 4.9
45 Copper 85 5.8
45 Lead 260 7
45 Mercury <0.05 0.13
45 Nickel 83 0.6 Samples Exceeding EIL Criteria:
BH102_0.1-0.2 (83 mg/kg)
BH102_1.0-1.1 (63 mg/kg)
BH109_0.1-0.2 (57 mg/kg)
BH110_0.1-0.2 (54 mg/kg)
BH110_0.5-0.6 (40 mg/kg)
BH113_0.1-0.2 (53 mg/kg)
BH115_0.1-0.2 (64 mg/kg)
BH123_0.1-0.2 (37 mg/kg)
45 Zinc 240 7.2 Sample Exceeding EIL Criteria:
BH106_0.1-0.2 (240 mg/kg)
PCBs
24 Total PCBs <1 <1
Asbestos
24 Asbestos No Asbestos Sample Exceeding HSL Criteria:
asbestos detected BH112_0.1-0.2 (>0.01 %w/w)
detected
8.3.2 Soil Statistical Calculation (Nickel, Zinc and Benzo(α)pyrene in Fill)

The 95% upper confidence level (UCL) was calculated for the concentration of nickel, zinc and
benzo(α)pyrene in fill material at the site. The UCL for nickel, zinc and benzo(α)pyrene in fill at the site
could be calculated and applied due to the following:
 The highest concentration was less than 250 % of the nominated soil investigation level; and
 The standard deviation was less than 50 % of the nominated soil investigation level.
The UCL for nickel, zinc and benzo(α)pyrene in fill was calculated using the program ProUCL (version
5.1). The suggested UCL for use was 95 % Students-t UCL with the reported nickel concentration
equal to 22.29 mg/kg, zinc concentration equal to 52.05 mg/kg, and benzo(α)pyrene concentration
equal to 0.298 mg/kg . This reported nickel, zinc and benzo(α)pyrene concentrations is less than the
adopted EIL (35 mg/kg for nickel, 140 mg/kg for zinc and 1 mg/kg in benzo(α)pyrene). The UCL
calculations for are included in Appendix H.
It must be noted that and only fill samples collected from proposed grassed and landscaping areas
were calculated for the 95 % UCL, whilst for samples collected from proposed road, building and
basement areas were excluded.
Table 8-5 Summary of UCL Calculation
Analyte Standard Max. Conc. 95 % mean UCL

Deviation (mg/kg)
Nickel 16.2 57 22.29
Zinc 40.24 240 52.05
Benzo(α)pyrene 0.212 1 0.298
8.3.3 Groundwater Analytical Results

Laboratory analytical results for groundwater samples are summarised in Tables T2 and T3, which
also include the adopted GILs. Completed documentation used to track groundwater sample
movements and laboratory receipt (COC and SRA forms) are copied in Appendix G. Copies of the
laboratory analytical reports are attached in Appendix H.
With reference to Table T2, concentrations in excess of the adopted GILs were identified for:
 BH105W for cadmium (0.8μg/L), copper (13 μg/L), mercury (4.7 μg/L), nickel (90 μg/L) and zinc
(750μg/L),
 BH117W for nickel (5 μg/L) and zinc (26 μg/L); and
 BH120W for copper (2 μg/L), nickel (8 μg/L) and zinc (120μg/L).
No TRHs, BTEX, PAHs, Phenols, VOC (including Naphthalene) concentrations exceeded the GILs.
9. SITE CHARACTERISATION
9.1 ASBESTOS RISK
Asbestos was identified in laboratory examined fill soil sample BH112_0.1-0.2 as a 5 mm x 3 mm
fibre-cement fragment, collected during the field investigation at BH112. Given the small size of the
fibre-cement fragment reported, and the limitations associated with investigation methodology
adopted in this DSI (i.e. borehole) for identifying asbestos in soils, the potential for buried ACM and
friable asbestos to occur in the subsurface fill materials could not be excluded. It is recommended that
supplementary investigation is completed in the vicinity of BH112, prior to site excavation works, to
ascertain the presence of additional asbestos contamination. Investigative works should be completed
by test pit excavation, with soil sample analysis completed to quantify the amount of asbestos present
in soil (as per WADOH, 2009).
In addition, asbestos may be present within the existing building structure and it is recommended that
a hazardous materials survey (HMS) is undertaken prior to any demolition works on site. The HMS
should be conducted once all buildings have been vacated by current users to enable access to all
parts of the building and allow for an adequate survey;
9.2 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION

Elevated metals (cadmium, copper, mercury, nickel and zinc) were reported in the groundwater
samples collected. Concentrations of these heavy metals are likely to be representative of
background groundwater concentrations as the highest concentrations were generally reported within
the up-hydraulic gradient well (BH105W), however elevated concentrations were noted in onsite
groundwater monitoring wells.
Overall the groundwater quality presents a low risk to human health as there is no beneficial use of
groundwater, both at the site and in close proximity due to the low yield and elevated salinity of the
Ashfield Shale aquifer.
9.3 REVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

On the basis of investigation findings the CSM discussed in Section 3 was considered to
appropriately identify contamination sources, migration mechanisms and exposure pathways, as well
as potential onsite and offsite receptors. Previously known data gaps, have largely been addressed;
however, the following remaining data gaps need to be addressed during the remediation phase of
works, post-demolition of site structures:
 Further investigation to ascertain the spatial extent of asbestos contamination in soils

 The condition of soils beneath existing site structures, inaccessible during this investigation.
10. CONCLUSIONS
The property located at 678 Victoria Road, Ryde NSW was the subject of a Detailed Site Investigation
that was conducted in order to assess the nature and degree of on-site contamination associated with
current and former uses of the property. Based on the findings of this assessment it was concluded
that:
 The site comprised an irregular shaped block, covering a total area of approximately 15,894 m .
2
The site is bound by Victoria Road to the north, The Gardens high-rise residential development
to the east and south, with the existing Calvary Ryde Retirement Community to the west;
 Soil sampling and analysis were conducted at twenty five (25) test bore locations. Sampling
regime was considered to be appropriate for investigation purposes and comprised
judgemental and systematic (triangular grid) sampling patterns, with allowance for structural
obstacles (e.g. building walls, underground and overhanging services and other physical
obstructions in use by existing operating businesses);
 The sub-surface layers comprised of granular and cohesive fill materials underlain by residual
Silty Clay and weathered Shale bedrock;
 Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 4.116 to 8.815 meters top of casing;
 Results of soil samples collected from soil test boreholes reported EIL/ESL excess nickel
levels at BH102_0.1-0.2 (83 mg/kg), BH102_1.0-1.1 (63 mg/kg), BH109_0.1-0.2 (57 mg/kg),
BH110_0.1-0.2 (54 mg/kg), BH110_0.5-0.6 (40 mg/kg), BH113_0.1-0.2 (53 mg/kg),
BH115_0.1-0.2 (64 mg/kg) and BH123_0.1-0.2 (37 mg/kg), excess zinc levels at BH106_0.1-
0.2 (240 mg/kg) and excess benzo(α)pyrene levels at BH112_0.1-0.2 (1 mg/kg);
 Asbestos was reported at reported in shallow fill at BH112;
 95% UCL calculations were conducted for nickel, zinc and benzo(α)pyrene for samples
collected from proposed grassed and landscaping areas and was calculated to be below of
their corresponding EIL criteria;
 Results of groundwater samples collected from monitoring well reported in excess of the
adopted groundwater investigation criteria at BH105W for cadmium (0.8μg/L), copper (13 μg/L),
mercury (4.7 μg/L), nickel (90 μg/L) and zinc (750 μg/L), BH117W for nickel (5 μg/L) and zinc
(26 μg/L) and BH120W for copper (2 μg/L), nickel (8 μg/L) and zinc (120μg/L). These
concentrations were considered to be within natural background concentrations for an
urbanised environment;
 The following data gaps were identified in this DSI will require closure during the remediation
phase of works, prior to site excavation:
 Further investigation to ascertain the spatial extent of asbestos contamination in soils

 The condition of soils beneath existing site structures, inaccessible during this
investigation.
Based on the findings of this report and with consideration of the Statement of Limitations (Section
12), localised asbestos contamination was reported at one testing location. Overall, EI consider that
the environmental condition of the site can be made suitable for the proposed development classed
as residential, with basement car parking, recreational open spaces and driveways, after carrying out
the recommendations described in Section 11.
11. RECOMMENDATIONS
In view of the findings of this investigation and in accordance with published standards and guidance
(NEPM 2013 guidelines) it is considered that the site can be made suitable for the proposed
development classed as residential, with basement car parking, recreational open spaces and
driveways, subject to the implementation of the following recommendations:
 A Hazardous Materials Survey (HMS) should be completed prior to demolition of existing

structures, to ensure that hazardous materials that may have been used within the existing
buildings are adequately managed during demolition to prevent the spreading of contamination,
if present. The HMS should be conducted once all buildings have been vacated by current
users to enable access to all parts of the buildings and allow for an adequate survey;
 A Remedial Action Plan (RAP) should be prepared in accordance with the OEH (2011)
Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites prior to the commencement of site
redevelopment works. The RAP will provide details of the methodology and procedures
required for effective site remediation, which may include:
 Further investigation, prior to site excavation and remedial works, to close data gaps
identified during the DSI;
 Outline the remediation requirements for contamination identified during this DSI and
other contamination that may be identified during data gap closure investigations;
 Provide the requirements and procedure for waste classification assessment, in order to
enable classification of site soils to be excavated and disposed off-site during the
proposed basement excavation and remedial works, in accordance with the Waste
Classification Guidelines (EPA, 2014); and
 Provide a SAQP for the validation of remediation activities performed on-site.
 Validate soils in accordance with the RAP to ensure that any contamination is remediated or
managed by assessing against the respective EPA thresholds and guidelines; and
 Preparation of a final site validation report by a qualified environmental consultant, concluding

that the site has been remediated to allow the proposed development for commercial and
residential purposes.
12. STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS

The findings presented in this report are the result of discrete and specific sampling methodologies
used in accordance with best industry practices and standards. Due to the site-specific nature of soil
sampling from point locations, it is considered likely that all variations in subsurface conditions across
a site cannot be fully defined, no matter how comprehensive the field investigation program.
While normal assessments of data reliability have been made, EI assumes no responsibility or liability
for errors in any data obtained from previous assessments conducted on site, regulatory agencies
(e.g. Council, EPA), statements from sources outside of EI, or developments resulting from situations
outside the scope of works of this project.
Despite all reasonable care and diligence, the ground conditions encountered and concentrations of
contaminants measured may not be representative of conditions between the locations sampled and
investigated. In addition, site characteristics may change at any time in response to variations in
natural conditions, chemical reactions and other events, e.g. groundwater movement and or spillages
of contaminating substances. These changes may occur subsequent to EI’s investigations and
assessment.
EI’s assessment is based upon the results of the site investigation and the program of surface and
subsurface sampling, screening and chemical testing which was set out in the proposal (EI ref.
P13880.4), and as agreed to by the Client on 22 February 2017. Neither EI, nor any other reputable
consultant, can provide unqualified warranties, nor does EI assume any liability for site conditions not
observed or accessible during the time of the investigations.
This report was prepared for Donald Cant Watts Cork and no responsibility is accepted for use of any
part of this report in any other context or for any other purpose or by other third parties. This report
does not purport to provide legal advice.
This report and associated documents remain the property of EI subject to payment of all fees due for
this assessment. The report shall not be reproduced except in full and with prior written permission by
EI.
REFERENCES
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water
Quality, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture
and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, October 2000.
Australian Standard (2005) Table E1 – Minimum sampling points required for site characterisation, in
Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil – Part 1:
Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds, Standards Australia, AS 4482.1-2005, p45.
Bouwer, H. (1978) Groundwater Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Limited, 480 p.
Chapman, G.A. and Murphy, C.L. (1989) Soil Landscapes of the Sydney 1:100 000 sheet, Soil
Conservation Service of NSW, Sydney, September 1989.
DEC (2006) Soil Investigation Levels for Urban Development Sites in NSW, in Guidelines for the NSW
Site Auditor Scheme, 2nd Edn., NSW Dept. of Environment and Conservation, DEC 2006/121,
April 2006.
DEC (2007) Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Groundwater Contamination, Dept. of
Environment and Conservation, New South Wales, DEC 2007/144, June 2007.
DMR (1983) Sydney 1:100,000 Geological Series Sheet 9130 (Edition 1) Geological Survey of New
South Wales, Department of Mineral Resources.
EPA (1995) Sampling Design Guidelines Environment Protection Authority of New South Wales,
Contaminated Sites Unit, EPA 95/59, September 1995.
EPA (2014) Technical Note: Investigation of Service Station Site Environment Protection Authority of
New South Wales, EPA 2014/0315, April 2014.
EPA (2014) Waste Classification Guidelines, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water,
New South Wales,
Murphy CL (1997) Acid Sulfate Soil Risk of the Botany Bay Sheet Department of Land and Water
Conservation, Sydney, Second Edition. Supplied by the Sydney South Coast, Geographical
Information Systems Unit.
NEPM (2013) Schedule B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater, Schedule B2
Guideline on Site Characterisation and Schedule B4 Guideline on site-specific health risk
assessments, National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure
1999, National Environmental Protection Council, December 1999, Amendment 2013.
OEH (2011) Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites, NSW Office of Environment
and Heritage (OEH), OEH 2011/0650, 23 p
USEPA (2006) Data Quality Assessment: A Reviewers Guide – EPA QA/G-9R. USEPA Office of
Environmental Information, EPA/240/B-06/002, February 2006.
WADOH (2009) Guidelines for the Assessment, Remediation and Management of Asbestos-
Contaminated Sites in Western Australia. Published by the Western Australian Department of
Health, May 2009.
ABBREVIATIONS
ACM Asbestos-containing materials
ASS Acid sulfate soils
ANZECC Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council
ARMCANZ Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand
B(α)P Benzo(α)Pyrene (a PAH compound), - B(α)P TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient
BH Borehole
BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene
COC Chain of Custody
DA Development Application
DEC Department of Environment and Conservation, NSW (see OEH)
DECC Department of Environment and Climate Change, NSW (see OEH)
DECCW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, NSW (see OEH)
DNAPL Dense, non-aqueous phase liquid
DO Dissolved Oxygen
DP Deposited Plan
EC Electrical Conductivity
Eh Redox potential
EIL Ecological Investigation Levels
EPA Environment Protection Authority
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
ESL Ecological Screening Levels
F1 TRH C6 – C10 less the sum of BTEX concentrations (Ref. NEPM 2013, Schedule B1)
F2 TRH >C10 – C16 less the concentration of naphthalene (Ref. NEPM 2013, Schedule B1)
GIL Groundwater Investigation Level
GME Groundwater Monitoring Event
HIL Health-based Investigation Level
HM Heavy Metals
HSL Health-based Screening Level
km Kilometres
LNAPL Light, non-aqueous phase liquid (also referred to as PSH)
LOR Limit of Reportingm Metres
MAH Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
mAHD Metres Australian Height Datum
mBGL Metres Below Ground Level
mg/L Milligrams per litre
µg/L Micrograms per litre
mV Millivolts
MW Monitoring well
NATA National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia
NEPC National Environmental Protection Council
NEPM National Environmental Protection Measures
NSW New South Wales
OCP Organochlorine Pesticides
OEH Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW (formerly DEC, DECC, DECCW)
OPP Organophosphorous Pesticides
PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyls
pH Measure of the acidity or basicity of an aqueous solution

PSH Phase-separated hydrocarbons (also referred to as LNAPL)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit (limit of detection for respective laboratory instruments)
QA/QC Quality Assurance / Quality Control
RAP Remediation Action Plan
SAQP Sampling and Analysis Quality Plan
SIL Site Investigation Levels
SRA Sample receipt advice (document confirming laboratory receipt of samples)
SWL Standing Water Level
TDS Total dissolved solids (a measure of water salinity)
TCLP Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure
TRH Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (non-specific analysis of organic compounds)
UCL Upper Confidence Limit of the mean
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
UPSS Underground Petroleum Storage System
UST Underground Storage Tank
VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds (specific organic compounds which are volatile)
VOCC Volatile Organic Chlorinated Compounds)
WADOH Western Australian Department of Health
FIGURES
SITE
SITE
Drawn: D.R. Figure:

Donald Cant Watts Corke (DCWC)
Approved:
Date:
N.F.
16-02-17
678 Victoria Road, Ryde, NSW
1
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street, PYRMONT 2009
Ph (02) 9516 0722 Fax (02) 9518 5088
Approx Scale: N.T.S. Site Locality Plan Project: E23061 AA
Map Source: Boffa Robertson Group, job number/drawing: 1602/DA01 (Feb 2016)
LEGEND Figure:
Approximate Site Boundary
Drawn: D.R. Donald Cant Watts Corke (DCWC)
Approximate Investigation Area
Approximate Proposed Building Outline
Approximate Borehole Location
Approved: N.F.
2
Approximate Monitorig Well/Borehole Location Proposed Sampling Locations
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street, PYRMONT 2009 Date: 16-02-17 Project: E23061 AB_Rev0
Ph (02) 9516 0722 Fax (02) 9518 5088
Map Source: Boffa Robertson Group, job number/drawing: 1602/DA01 (Feb 2016)
LEGEND Figure:
Approximate Site Boundary
Drawn: D.R. Donald Cant Watts Corke (DCWC)
Approximate Investigation Area
Approximate Proposed basement outline
Approximate Borehole Location
Approved: N.F.
3
Approximate Monitorig Well/Borehole Location Soil and Groundwater Exceedance Plan
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street, PYRMONT 2009 Date: 16-02-17 Project: E23061 AB_Rev0
Ph (02) 9516 0722 Fax (02) 9518 5088
TABLES
Table T1 - Summary of Soil Analytical results
Heavy Metals PAHs BTEX TRH
Sampling Date
Total PCBs
Asbestos
OCPs
OPPs
Carcinogenic PAHs
Sample ID
Benzo(α)pyrene
(as B(α)P TEQ)
Ethylbenzene
Total Xylenes
Naphthalene
F3 (>C16-C34)
F4 (>C34-C40)
Total PAHs
Benzene
Toluene
#
As Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Ni Zn F12 F23
Soil Invesitgation Results

BH101 0.1-0.2 8 0.3 14 26 21 <0.05 13 22 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH101 1.5-1.6 5 <0.3 7 30 17 <0.05 2.3 17 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH102 0.1-0.2 <3 <0.3 29 35 7 <0.05 83 41 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH102 1.0-1.1 10 0.3 19 33 15 <0.05 63 31 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH102 3.5-3.6 4 <0.3 13 6.5 8 <0.05 9.3 8.3 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH103 0.1-0.2 6 <0.3 12 16 22 <0.05 3.2 33 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 100 220 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH104 0.2-0.3 3 <0.3 7.6 12 17 <0.05 1 11 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH105W 0.2-0.3 10/02/2017 <3 <0.3 8.1 10 18 <0.05 0.6 12 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH106 0.1-0.2 8 0.8 25 85 260 0.13 7.9 240 0.7 0.5 4.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 32 120 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH106 0.5-0.6 7 0.4 26 35 65 <0.05 3.7 57 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 43 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH107 0.1-0.2 9 <0.3 14 18 23 <0.05 3.2 30 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 25 140 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH108 0.1-0.2 8 0.5 26 70 61 0.06 4.5 78 0.4 0.2 1.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH108 0.5-0.6 10 0.5 35 16 25 <0.05 2.5 15 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH109 0.1-0.2 5 0.3 71 22 14 <0.05 57 40 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH109 0.5-0.6 5 <0.3 23 11 23 <0.05 11 9.3 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH110 0.1-0.2 5 0.3 72 26 14 <0.05 54 47 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH110 0.5-0.6 6 0.3 66 19 17 <0.05 40 32 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
9/02/2017
BH111 0.1-0.2 6 <0.3 9.5 29 22 <0.05 6.4 51 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 100 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH111 1.0-1.1 8 0.6 34 30 35 <0.05 6.6 34 0.6 0.4 4.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH112 0.1-0.2 3 <0.3 7.7 13 18 <0.05 5.6 41 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND >0.01
8/02/2017
BH112 0.5-0.6 5 <0.3 18 10 21 <0.05 3.4 23 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH113 0.1-0.2 4 <0.3 12 35 16 <0.05 53 75 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
10/02/2017
BH114 0.1-0.2 7 0.3 18 63 65 0.06 5.3 94 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH115 0.1-0.2 4 <0.3 74 26 13 <0.05 64 49 <0.3 <0.1 1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH115 0.5-0.6 9/02/2017 8 <0.3 27 19 19 <0.05 18 21 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH116 0.1-0.2 9 0.4 29 15 29 <0.05 4.6 22 <0.3 0.1 0.9 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 32 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH117W 0.1-0.2 6 <0.3 12 32 23 <0.05 26 35 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH117W 1.0-1.1 8/02/2017 9 <0.3 20 11 25 <0.05 3.7 19 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH117W 2.5-2.6 7 0.3 32 11 24 <0.05 5.1 18 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH118 0.1-0.2 5 <0.3 13 16 14 <0.05 21 27 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH118 2.0-2.1 10/02/2017 8 <0.3 22 14 25 <0.05 3 17 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH119 0.1-0.2 3 <0.3 4.9 5.8 8 <0.05 3.9 25 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH120W 0.1-0.2 8 <0.3 13 20 160 <0.05 6.2 44 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 49 210 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH120W 0.5-0.6 8/02/2017 9 0.5 29 20 63 <0.05 5 54 0.4 0.2 2.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 95 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH120W 1.5-1.6 8 0.6 35 16 52 <0.05 5.3 36 0.5 0.3 3.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH121 0.5-0.6 7 0.4 27 21 45 <0.05 4.7 33 0.9 0.6 7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH122 0.1-0.2 4 <0.3 54 15 34 <0.05 9.1 49 1.4 1 12 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH122 1.0-1.1 6 <0.3 39 12 22 <0.05 8.2 20 0.7 0.5 4.7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH123 0.1-0.2 4 <0.3 9.9 38 22 <0.05 37 72 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
9/02/2017
BH124 0.1-0.2 10 0.4 25 21 43 0.06 5.1 43 0.5 0.3 3.9 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 130 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
BH124 1.5-1.6 6 0.3 32 13 31 <0.05 5.2 17 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH124 3.3-3.4 6 0.4 17 27 19 <0.05 1.1 7.2 <0.3 <0.1 <0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 NA NA NA NA
BH125 0.1-0.2 8 0.5 28 19 59 <0.05 5.9 52 0.5 0.3 3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <25 <25 <90 <120 ND ND ND <0.01
95% UCL Calculaiton
NT NT NT NT NT NT 22.29 52.05 NT 0.298 NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT
SILs
HIL B - Residential with minimal opportunities 100
100 20 6,000 300 40 400 7,400 3 NR 300 600 NR 1
for soil access Cr(VI)
HSL A & HSL B - Residential Source depths (0 m to <1 m. BGL) 3 0.5 160 55 40 45 110
Soil texture classification –Sand 1 Source depths (1 m to <2 m. BGL) NL 0.5 220 NL 60 70 240
EILs / ESLs - urban residential and public open

NR NR 205 90 1,260 NR 35 140 NR 0.7 NR 170 50 85 70 105 180* 120* 300 180 NR NR NR
space 1 4
Management Limits – Residential, parkland

and public open space 700 1000 2500
Coarse grained soil texture 1
Asbestos contamination HSL – Residential B

0.04
Bonded ACM (%w/w)
Asbestos contamination HSL for

0.001
Non Bonded / Friable Asbestos (%w/w)
Notes: All results are recorded in mg/kg

Highlighted values indicates concentration exceeds Human Health Based Soil Criteria for Asbestos
HIL B NEPC 1999 Amendment 2013 ‘HIL B” Health Based Investigation Levels applicable for residential exposure settings with minimal opportunities for soil access, including dwellings with fully and permanently paved yard space such as high rise buildings and apartments.
# Thresholds are for Chromium VI. It is assumed all detected Chromium is Chromium (VI), as Chromium (III) would be too unstable to exist under normal circumstances.
NR No current published criterion.
NL Not Limiting’ If the derived soil vapour limit exceeds the soil concentration at which the pore water phase cannot dissolve any more of the individual chemical
ND ‘Not detected’ i.e. all concentrations of the compounds within the analyte group were found to be below the laboratory limits of detection.
NT ‘Not Tested’ i.e. the sample as not analysed.
1 Coarse Grained soil values were applied, being the most conservative of the material types.
Table T2 – Summary of Groundwater Investigation Results
Heavy Metals PAHs BTEX VOCs Phenols TPHs
Benzo(α)pyrene
Total Phenols
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
Total VOCs
Total PAHs
m/p-xylene
Benzene
o-xylene
Toluene
Sample Identification
As Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Ni Zn F1 F2 F3 F4
BH105W <1 0.8 <1 13 <1 4.7 5 90 750 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <10 <0.01 <50 <60 <500 <500
BH117W <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 5 26 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <10 <0.01 <50 <60 <500 <500
BH120W <1 0.1 <1 2 <1 <0.1 8 120 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <10 <0.01 <50 <60 <500 <500
GILs
1
HSL - A & B Residential NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Dri NR NL 800 NL NL NL NR NR 1,000 1,000 NR NR
GIL 2
24 (AsIII) 3 0.7 27 (Cr III) 1.3 4.4 0.1 7 15 NR NR 50 500 NR 140 3 350 3 250 3 NR 400 50 4 60 4 500 4 500 4
(Marine Water)
Notes:
All values are μg/L unless stated otherwise NR = No current publish criterion
F1 = TPH C6-C10 less the sum concentration of BTEX
F2 = TPH C>10-C16 less the concentration of Naphthalene
F3 = TPH C>16-C34
F4 = TPH C>34-C40
1 =NEPC (2013) Table 1A(4) Groundwater HSL A & B for vapour intrusion at the contaminant source depth ranges in sand 2m to <4m
2 = NEPM (2013) Groundwater Investigation Levels for marine water quality, based on ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000)
3 = In lack of a criteria the NEPM (2013) GILs for fresh water quality (moderately disturbed system) have been used
4 = In lack of a criteria the laboratory PQL has been used
5=Concentration from Dupicate Sample GWQD1 of Primary Sample BH105W
Highlighted indicates analyte concentration value exceeding marine water criteria
APPENDIX A
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLANS
P R O P O S E D
For :
LCM Health Care

Level 18, 68 Pitt Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000
Tel : (02) 9258 1718 Website : www.calvarycare.org.au
Level 1, 14 Martin Place, SYDNEY NSW 2000

Tel : (02) 9922 4500 Website : www.dcwc.com.au
br
br br boffa robertson group

Architecture, Health Planning, Project Management DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RE-ISSUE
br
Suite 7, Level 1 Epica, 9 Railway Street

Chatswood, NSW 2067
Tel : (02) 9406 7000. Fax : (02) 9406 7099
March, 2017
Email : brgroup@brgr.net
1602 DA00
C This document, information and design concepts shown in it are copyright to
Boffa Robertson Group. Any inconsistencies between drawn information and
current Codes and Standards are to be notified immediately.
BRICK LEGEND
RESIDENCE
TILE ROOF
Boundary line
Trees to be retained
S T R E E T Trees to be removed
P R I N C E S
03'
B O U N D A /
R
/ /
Y / / / /
50"
/ / / / / / / / /
57.40 Walls & driveway
to be removed
/
165.81
/
/
/
/
Buildings to be
/
/
ROOF
/
ROOF B O U N D A R Y 50"
/
52.07 03'
Y
53.09 57.50
/
ROOF 57.10
52.91 ROOF
demolished
/
55.72
/
49.40 55.71 73.15
/
R
/
UNIT NO. 47-48
A
WORKSHOP 1 + 2 STOREY
Existing buildings to
/
UNIT NO. 131-138
/
BRICK + TILE ROOF

D
ROOF BRICK + TILE ROOF

38.1
remain
/
ROOF 62.12 2 STOREY ROOF 56.80
B
ROOF
58.48 BRICK + TILE ROOF
N
61.04
/
61.08
UNIT NO. PARKING UNDER
O
/
/
ROOF
45.99
/
/
52.09 ROOF
Reduced Level
U
139-146
U
52.01 ROOF
/
ROOF
/
58.54
/
59.77
N
2 STOREY
/
O
ROOF / / / /
ROOF
/
BRICK + TILE ROOF
/
52.89 55.74
D
PARKING UNDER ROOF
/
B
MAIN VISITOR
/
57.43
/
CARPARK
/
2 1
/
R
/
FL 52.50
/
/
/
ROOF
/
56.11 54.00 /
Y
/
ROOF
/
ROOF 53.23
75
/
46.84 52.87 ROOF /
.
55.50
82
55.62
/
/
/
ROOF
/
12.12 ROOF ROOF 55.61

57.21
/
52.19
51
UNIT NO. 123-130
'
ROOF
/
49.25
2 STOREY
/
ROOF
53.60
BRICK + TILE ROOF
/
ROOF PARKING UNDER ROOF

58.23
50.59
ROOF
FL 47.48 51.50 MARIAN
/
49.34 ROOF
HOSTEL
UNIT NO. 56.95
44
ROOF
.17
52.89 ROOF GREVILLEA LODGE

115-122 ROOF
D
ROOF ROOF ROOF

58.39 58.38 SINGLE STOREY
/
ROOF 52.89 55.77 59.98

20
110 111
/
P
55.61 ROOF BRICK + TILE ROOF

2 STOREY
'
54.24 ROOF
/
BRICK + TILE ROOF ROOF ROOF 59.94 FL 53.06
54.59 58.39 ROOF
8
PARKING UNDER
/
/
ROOF ROOF 58.40
FL 46.68
4
/
60.00
/
61.41
ROOF
/
7
ROOF ROOF
/
58.38 ROOF 63.81
49.26
1
/
55
61.37 ROOF
/
46.00 62.12
"
ROOF ROOF
3
DALTON
/
62.65 57.86
MARIAN
3
ROOF
/
/
49.34
1012 ROOF
58.38 HOUSE HOSTEL
/
ROOF
/
ROOF
ROOF
DP 836977 TWO STOREY 62.97
/
59.80 ROOF
46.46 ROOF ROOF ROSE COTTAGE
/
55.78 BRICK + TILE ROOF 63.80
/
ROOF
7.71 Ha 61.48
58.39 FL 52.98 SINGLE STOREY
/
BRICK + TILE ROOF
112
/
/
ROOF FL 51.26
/
/
46.46 ROOF ROOF
V
58.38 55.51 52.83
/
UNIT NO. XAVIER
/
ROOF
ROOF ROOF
/
/
52.78
107-114 ROOF
APARTMENTS 58.36 59.56
I
/
/
52.75
UNIT NO. 160-175 ROOF
2 STOREY ROOF
MARIAN
/
62.12
/
MULTI STOREY
C
BRICK + TILE ROOF 51.73 ROOF
/
BRICK + TILE ROOF
PARKING UNDER 58.38
HOSTEL
/
ROOF PARKING UNDER

FL 41.00
1131 RL 47.13 MAGNOLIA LODGE
/
46.44 FL 53.02 ROOF
T
ROOF
/
61.45 61.17ROOF ROOF SINGLE STOREY
/
58.37
/
60.03
UNIT NO. ROOF
62.80 ROOF
ROOF BRICK + TILE ROOF
O
/
/
ROOF 60.03 62.85 FL 50.21
/
ROOF
105-106 62.40
/
46.48
/
1 & 2 STOREY ROOF
R
MAINTENANCE
/
/
BRICK + RL 47.03 ROOF 59.54
TILE ROOF WORKSHOP ROOF
56.45 FL
/
/
1 1 STOREY 58.40 52.98
/
GARAGE ROOF
I
RENDERED
114 1132
/
ROOF 58.20
B
BRICK
/
BRICK 60.03 ROOF
MARIAN
11
ROOF ROOF 62.67 48.50
04
DP 858637 DP 847133 DP 1017414 TILE ROOF FL 44.12 60.79
/
/
A
6.7
58.40
'
O
25
HOSTEL
/
/
GARAGE RL 46.95 FL
/
BRICK 47.17
U
ROOF
WARATAH HOUSE 49.08
B
/
TILE ROOF UNIT NO. ROOF 60.81
/
ROOF SINGLE STOREY
/
O
N
58.21
/
RL 46.77
150-159 62.39 BRICK + TILE ROOF
/
FL 49.21
/
RL 46.93
U
ROOF MULTI STOREY
D
ROOF /
/
58.19 BRICK + TILE ROOF 61.14
/
/
N
/
PARKING UNDER
UNIT NO.
A
GARAGE 38.40
/
/
/
/
R
D
BRICK
/
103-104
/
ROOF
R
TILE ROOF 61.09

/
/
A
106
1 & 2 STOREY
O
/
/
/
BRICK +
.19
UNIT NO.
Y
ROOF
R
TILE ROOF 43.50 57.17
/
/
/
14'
94,99,100
Y
/
A
15
/
/
1 & 2 STOREY
/
"
/
BRICK + G
/
B AR
/
TILE ROOF TIL RICK AGE
D
UNIT NO.
/
GARAGE GARAGE ER
/
GAZEBO
BRICK OO
BRICK
68-70
/
TILE ROOF
UNIT NO.
/
TILE ROOF TILE ROOF F
/
1 & 2 STOREY
101-102
/
BRICK +
1 & 2 STOREY TILE ROOF
/
/
GARAGE BRICK + GARAGE FL 45.99
UNIT NO.
/
BRICK BRICK
DP 53675 TILE ROOF
/
TILE ROOF
TILE ROOF
89-90 HYSON GREEN
/
UNIT NO.
/
1 & 2 STOREY
/
45.00
93,97,98 BRICK +
/
/
1 & 2 STOREY TILE ROOF
UNIT NO.
/
BRICK + GARAGE
/
30"
BRICK
/
TILE ROOF
TILE ROOF 86-87
/
17
UNIT NO.
.95
1 & 2 STOREY
/
CHAPEL
/
BRICK +
65-67
/
TILE ROOF 45.99
/
1 & 2 STOREY
/
GARAGE /
BRICK +
/
GARAGE BRICK
/
GARAGE TILE ROOF
/
BRICK TILE ROOF
/
GA BRICK
TILE ROOF
BR RAGE
/
40.66 TILE
/
TIL ICK ROOF 45.00
/
37.55 RO E
/
UNIT NO. OF UNIT NO.
17.
/
/
92,95,96 71-73
95
/
UNIT NO.
/
1 & 2 STOREY 1 & 2 STOREY GARAGE 42.02
/
BRICK
53-54
/
BRICK + BRICK +
TILE ROOF TILE ROOF TILE
/
UNIT NO. ROOF 1 & 2 STOREY
/
BRICK +
83-85 TILE ROOF
/
1 & 2 STOREY GARAGE

/
BRICK + BRICK UNIT NO.

MARY POTTER MARY POTTER
/
TILE ROOF TILE

51-52
/
B
ROOF
NURSING HOME NURSING HOME
/
/
1 & 2 STOREY
17.9
37.21
UNIT NO.
O
BRICK +
/
GARAGE
/
5
TILE ROOF
BRICK
62-64
/
/
U
TILE GARAGE
GARAGE 1 & 2 STOREY GARAGE P
/
ROOF BRICK GARAGE

BRICK BRICK + BRICK
N
TILE
/
/
TILE ROOF TILE ROOF TILE BRICK FL 42.51

ROOF TILE
/
/
/
ROOF
/
/
D
38.52 ROOF
GAZEBO 0m 5 10 20 30 40 50m
A
UNIT NO.
GARAGE
BRICK UNIT NO. S C A L E: 1:650
55-56
R
TILE ROOF
1010
23.90
80-82 1 & 2 STOREY
Y 10
DP 836975 1 & 2 STOREY

UNIT NO. BRICK +
5B
85.
BRICK + TILE ROOF

'
TILE ROOF 77-79 UNIT NO. GARAGE

GARAGE
O
1 & 2 STOREY BRICK 4 Re-issue to Council 09.03.17
74-76 TILE ROOF BRICK
/
BRICK +
1 & 2 STOREY TILE ROOF MARY POTTER
U
TILE ROOF 3 DA submission 22.09.16
/
BRICK +
TILE ROOF MATERNAL NURSING HOME
/
N
2 Preliminary Issue 08.06.16
HEART 46.03
/
D
CONVENT 1 Preliminary Issue 01.03.16
/
32.23 UNIT NO. BRICK + TILE ROOF

/
A
59-61 GARAGE FL 42.79 No. Amendment Date
15R
BRICK
UNIT NO.
.2
1 & 2 STOREY
/
TILE
BRICK + ROOF
57-58
/
TILE ROOF Project
Y
1 & 2 STOREY
/
BRICK +
CALVARY RYDE RCF & ILU
05"
/
TILE ROOF
/
678 Victoria Road, Ryde

/
GARAGE P
GARAGE 44.00
/
36.00 BRICK
BRICK
TILE Drawing
18.235
TILE
ROOF
/
ROOF
EXISTING / DEMOLITION PLAN
/
43.16
/
324.2 /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / // // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
B O U N D A R Y 25'
/
/
B O U N D A R Y B O U N D A R Y
1010
DP 836975
Calvary Ryde
1010 Retirement Community
DP 836975

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
Date FEB 2016 Job No. : Drawing

Scale 1:650 @ A1
Drawn JK 1602 / DA01
Amendment 4
BRICK LEGEND
RESIDENCE
Boundary line
P R I N C E S
B O U N D A R Y Walls & driveway

to be removed
B O U N D A R Y Buildings to be
Y
demolished
R
UNIT NO. 47-48

A
WORKSHOP Existing buildings to

UNIT NO. 131-138
D
remain
B
N
UNIT NO.
O
Existing building
U
139-146
U
N
O
converted to
D
B
Community Centre
A
R
Y
Proposed driveway
UNIT NO. 123-130

Proposed building
MARIAN
HOSTEL
UNIT NO.
115-122
GREVILLEA LODGE
DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS
SITE AREA
RCF ILU TOTAL

DALTON MARIAN
1012 HOUSE HOSTEL BASEMENT FLOOR
DP 836977 ROSE COTTAGE
7.71 Ha - CAR PARKING
112 - SERVICES
UNIT NO. XAVIER
107-114 APARTMENTS
GROUND FLOOR
MARIAN
HOSTEL FIRST FLOOR
1131 MAGNOLIA LODGE
V
UNIT NO. SECOND FLOOR
105-106
I
THIRD FLOOR
C
1132 TOTAL
B
T
DP 1017414 MARIAN
O
HOSTEL
O
U
WARATAH HOUSE
B
UNIT NO.
O
N
R
150-159
PARKING
U
D
I
N
UNIT NO.
A
A
103-104 CAR PARKING 64 SPACES
R
A
UNIT NO.
Y
R
P
D
PORTE COCHERE (AMBULANCE BAY) 1 SPACE
R
94,99,100
Y
R
O
I
P
V
O W
E
R
UNIT NO. TOTAL CAR PARKING 65 SPACES
S A
E
68-70
D
UNIT NO.
O
Y
101-102
A
UNIT NO.
DP 53675 89-90 HYSON GREEN
UNIT NO. EXISTING BUILDING RESIDENT ACCOMMODATION (RCF)
D
93,97,98 CONVERTED TO
UNIT NO. GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR
86-87 COMMUNITY
UNIT NO. CENTRE
65-67 14 x1Bed= 14 Beds 45 x1Bed= 45 Beds 45 x1Bed= 45 Beds
3 x 2Bed= 6 Beds 3 x 2Bed= 6 Beds

UNDERCROFT
UNIT NO. UNIT NO. Sub Total : 14 Sub Total : 51 Sub Total : 51
92,95,96 71-73 UNIT NO.
53-54 TOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTS = 116
UNIT NO.
83-85
UNIT NO. RESIDENT ACCOMMODATION (ILU)
ST. JOSEPH'S ST. MARGARET'S
51-52
B
WING WING 1B 1B+S 2B 2B+S 3B 3B+S Total

UNIT NO.
O
62-64
U
GROUND RL.44.50 GROUND FLOOR 1 3 2 2 - 1 9

N
D
THIRD FLOOR - 2 3 4 3 - 12
A
B
UNIT NO. UNIT NO.
O
55-56
R
1010 80-82 TOTAL 1 5 5 6 3 1 21
U
Y
DP 836975 UNIT NO. E D
N
O S A Y
O P
77-79 UNIT NO. W
D
P R I V E
ST. ANNE'S D R
A
74-76
R
WING 3 Preliminary Issue 11.08.16
O
PROPOSED
Y
MATERNAL
U
HEART RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY /
N
RL
UNIT NO. INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS

.44
.20
No. Amendment Date
D
59-61
UNIT NO. GROUND RL.44.50
A
57-58 GROUND RL.44.50 Project
R
Y
Drawing
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PREVIOUS DA SUBMISSION
BUILDING LINE
SERVICE ROAD
324.2
B O U N D A R Y 25' B O U N D A R Y
1010
DP 836975
Calvary Ryde
DP 836975

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
0m 5 10 20 30 40 50m Tel. (02) 9406 7000
S C A L E: 1:650 Fax. (02) 9406 7099
7 Re-issue to Council 09.03.17
6 DA submission 22.09.16 Date MAR 2016 Job No. : Drawing
5 Preliminary Issue 08.09.16 Scale 1:650 @ A1
4 Preliminary Issue 26.08.16 Drawn AL 1602 / DA02
No. Amendment Date Amendment 7
BRICK LEGEND
RESIDENCE
Boundary line
P R I N C E S
B O U N D A R Y Walls & driveway

to be removed
B O U N D A R Y Buildings to be
Y
demolished
R
UNIT NO. 47-48

A
WORKSHOP Existing buildings to

UNIT NO. 131-138
D
remain
B
N
UNIT NO.
O
Existing building
U
139-146
U
N
O
converted to
D
B
Community Centre
A
R
Y
Proposed driveway
UNIT NO. 123-130

Proposed building
MARIAN
HOSTEL
UNIT NO.
115-122
GREVILLEA LODGE
DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS
SITE AREA
RCF ILU TOTAL

DALTON MARIAN
1012 HOUSE HOSTEL BASEMENT FLOOR
DP 836977 ROSE COTTAGE
7.71 Ha - CAR PARKING
112 - SERVICES
UNIT NO. XAVIER
107-114 APARTMENTS
GROUND FLOOR
MARIAN
HOSTEL FIRST FLOOR
1131 MAGNOLIA LODGE
V
UNIT NO. SECOND FLOOR
105-106
I
THIRD FLOOR
C
1132 TOTAL
B
T
DP 1017414 MARIAN
O
HOSTEL
O
U
WARATAH HOUSE
B
UNIT NO.
O
N
R
150-159
PARKING
U
D
I
N
UNIT NO.
A
A
103-104 CAR PARKING 64 SPACES
R
A
UNIT NO.
Y
R
P
D
PORTE COCHERE (AMBULANCE BAY) 1 SPACE
R
94,99,100
Y
R
O
I
P
V
O W
E
R
UNIT NO. TOTAL CAR PARKING 65 SPACES
S A
E
68-70
D
UNIT NO.
O
Y
101-102
A
UNIT NO.
DP 53675 89-90 HYSON GREEN
UNIT NO. EXISTING BUILDING RESIDENT ACCOMMODATION (RCF)
D
93,97,98 CONVERTED TO
UNIT NO. GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR
86-87 COMMUNITY
UNIT NO. CENTRE
65-67 14 x1Bed= 14 Beds 45 x1Bed= 45 Beds 45 x1Bed= 45 Beds
3 x 2Bed= 6 Beds 3 x 2Bed= 6 Beds

UNDERCROFT
UNIT NO. UNIT NO. Sub Total : 14 Sub Total : 51 Sub Total : 51
92,95,96 71-73 UNIT NO.
53-54 TOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTS = 116
UNIT NO.
83-85
UNIT NO. RESIDENT ACCOMMODATION (ILU)
51-52
B
WING WING 1B 1B+S 2B 2B+S 3B 3B+S Total

UNIT NO.
O
62-64
U
GROUND RL.44.50 GROUND FLOOR 1 3 2 2 - 1 9

N
D
THIRD FLOOR - 2 3 4 3 - 12
A
B
UNIT NO. UNIT NO.
O
55-56
R
1010 80-82 TOTAL 1 5 5 6 3 1 21
U
Y
DP 836975 UNIT NO. E D
N
O S A Y
O P
77-79 UNIT NO. W
D
P R I V E
ST. ANNE'S D R
A
74-76
R
WING 3 Preliminary Issue 11.08.16
O
PROPOSED
Y
MATERNAL
U
HEART RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY /
N
RL
UNIT NO. INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS

.44
.20
No. Amendment Date
D
59-61
A
57-58 GROUND RL.44.50 Project
R
Y
Drawing
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PREVIOUS DA SUBMISSION
BUILDING LINE
SERVICE ROAD
324.2
B O U N D A R Y 25' B O U N D A R Y
1010
DP 836975
Calvary Ryde
DP 836975

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
0m 5 10 20 30 40 50m Tel. (02) 9406 7000
S C A L E: 1:650 Fax. (02) 9406 7099
6 DA submission 22.09.16 Date MAR 2016 Job No. : Drawing
5 Preliminary Issue 08.09.16 Scale 1:650 @ A1
4 Preliminary Issue 26.08.16 Drawn AL 1602 / DA02
No. Amendment Date Amendment 7
MARIAN current Codes and Standards are to be notified immediately.
HOSTEL
WARATAH HOUSE
SUMMER
B
WINDS
O
U
N
D
A
R
LOW WINTER
Y
AFTERNOON
UNIT NO. SUN
68-70
HYSON GREEN EXISTING BUILDING

CONVERTED TO
COMMUNITY
CENTRE
UNIT NO.
65-67
P
D
R
R
O
I
P
V
O
E
S
W
SUMMER UNDERCROFT
E
A
AFTERNOON
D
Y
SUN
UNIT NO.
53-54

UNIT NO. WING WING
51-52
UNIT NO.
V
62-64
I
GROUND RL.44.50
C
UNIT NO.
T
LOW WINTER
55-56 MORNING
SUN
O
E D
P O S A Y
B O
O W
ST. ANNE'S P R I V E
R
D R
WING
PROPOSED
U N
I
MATERNAL RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY /
INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS
D A
HEART
A
CONVENT RL
R Y
UNIT NO.
.44
.20
59-61
GROUND RL.44.50
57-58
R
O
0m 2 5 10 20m
A
S C A L E: 1:350
D
2 DA submission 22.09.16
No. Amendment Date
Project
SERVICE ROAD CALVARY RYDE RCF & ILU
324.2 678 Victoria Road, RYDE
B O U N D A R Y 25' B O U N D A R Y SUMMER Drawing

MORNING SITE ANALYSIS
SOUTHERLIES SUN
1010 Calvary Ryde

Retirement Community
DP 836975

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
OCCASIONAL Email : brgroup@brgr.net
SUMMER
BREEZES Date FEB 2016 Job No. : Drawing
Scale 1:350
Drawn JK 1602 / DA03
Amendment 3
Mary Potter Nursing Home KITCHEN / LAUNDRY

Converted to
COMMUNITY CENTRE SERVICE / PLANT
LIFT LOBBY
STAFF
MAIN SWITCH / COMMS
STORE
BASEMENT FLOOR AREA
RCF SERVICE
0 NO. of PARKING 65
86
17
V
I C
Line of
building
above
T
O
21
R
Line of
building
20
Tree Protection
above
I A
area
19
22
18
23
17
24
16
25
R
15
26
O
14
OSD Tank
27
B
13
Duct riser
A
over
28
O
12
D
U
Upstream
11
59
OSD Tank
10
N
58
29
09
Line of building
57
D
above
56
A
08
30
55
R
07
54
31
Y
06
32
53
05
04
52
02
33
01
51
0m 2 5 10 15m
34
6000
S C A L E: 1:200
35
50
48
49
36
RK 8 DA submission 22.09.16
CARPA
47
ENTRY 7 Detention tank added 15.09.16
11930
46
38
45
39
40
41
42
No. Amendment Date
43
2050
Project
44
Drawing
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
7870
Calvary Ryde
25'
Tree Protection Suite 7, Level 1 Epica, 9 Railway Street
Chatswood NSW 2067
area
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
Date NAR 2016 Job No. : Drawing

Scale 1:200 @ A1
Drawn AL 1602 / DA04
Amendment 9
15
69
8
7
5
9
3
2 0m 2
S C A L E: 1:200
5 10 15m

9 Detention tank added 15.09.16
4 8 Preliminary Issue 08.09.16
No. Amendment Date
Project
Drawing
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
18210
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
Date MAR 2016 Job No. : Drawing

Scale 1:200 @ A1
Amendment 11
RCF - BEDROOM - SINGLE
RCF - BEDROOM - LARGE
RCF - BEDROOM - PREMIUM
RCF - BEDROOM - DOUBLE
STORE
69
15 DIRTY UTILITY/ CLEAN UTILITY
DINING / LOUNGE / SITTING
FIRST FLOOR AREA
V
SECOND FLOOR AREA
I C
RCF(BEDROOM) S L P D TOTAL
FIRST FLOOR 27 15 3 3 48
T
SECOND FLOOR 27 15 3 3 48
O
TOTAL NO.
of BEDROOM
54 30 6 6 96
TOTAL NO. 54 30 6 12 102
R
of BEDS
I A
B
O
R
U
O
N
A
D
D
A
R
Y
2440
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

2
2
2

2
2
2
2
2
2

2

2

2

12955
2

2
2
2
No. Amendment Date
Project
Drawing
FIRST & SECOND FLOOR PLAN
17730
11970
7870
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale 1:200 @ A1
Amendment 9
ILU - 1 BED / 1 BED + STUDY
NY
O
LC
BA
THIRD FLOOR AREA
d
C'p
GE
2
GARDEN (third Floor)
G
UN
D
m
IN
x3
m
BE
LO
N
x6
2m
DI
4m
3.
f
NY
Re
x2 H
m
T
PLANT ROOM (third Floor)
BA
S D
P
9m
LC
O
BE
m
EN H
1.
W
P
BA
RY - KITC
q.
O
m
W
.3
2
x3
97
m
o.
S
.5
GE
m 2
St
+
x2 H
E
UN
ILU (1 storey) 1B+S 2B 2B+S 3B TOTAL
m
D
TC
.9
.2
.8
.
L'D
.m
x7
x2
LO
10 E
KI
1m
7m
5m
Sq
B
4.
1.
3.
x 1 TH
NG
m
2
2
.9
f
BA
Re
NO. of Unit 2 3 4 3 12
NI
2m
DI
1
m
D
.6
V
x5
BE
Y
8m
UD
o.
3.
St
ST
2
m
D
.3
x5
3. E
Y
B
m
Y
6
TR
I C
TR
EN
2
EN
D
m
x3
m
BE
.2
S
m
2m
S
x2
.6
EN
NY
EN
3.
x2
6m
ILU No. ILU Type Balcony Area
2m
2.
O
x1 Y
1
x2 H
6m
m
R
LC
m
T
D
.3
.
L'D
x6
BA
BE
BA
9m
6m
9m
P
1.
2.
3.
10 3 BED
FT
O
M
W
LI
BE .9m GE
T
S
N
x 7 UN
D+
HE
11
LO
1 BED + S
m
TC
.9
.
4m
x2
.m
KI
3m
Sq
NG
3.
O
2
98
NI
12 2 BED + S
f
Re
1
4
DI
m
RL BY
41
LO FT
D
.6
x5
BE
B
6.
LI
Y
8m
UD
.5
RE
3.
13 3 BED
.
ST
O
o
St
ST
R
Y
TR
14 3 BED
EN
D
m
m
x3
.2
.6
BE
S
x2
x2
EN
2m
2 N
NY
6m
m
E
3.
I A
.2
2.
O
15 2 BED
RY
TH
m
LC
.6
2
x2
L'D
x1
1 A
BA
R
m
B
6m
AI
.9
2.
ST
O
M
W
W
16 1 BED + S
BE GE
1
. S
m
EN
D
.3
N
Sq D+
m
x6
BE
.
U
.9
o
CH
6m
x7
St
LO
.9
3.
17
1m
2 BED + S
x2
3. I T
.m
x 1 TH
4.
m
m
K
.8
3
BA
NG
2m
2
98
NI
f
Re
1
m
18
Y
2 BED + S
DI
8 D
.6
TR
x5
3. E
B
m
EN
UD
2
f
m
Re
o.
D
.7
ST
x4
St
BE
B
19 2 BED + S
8m
N
E
TR
3.
ow
G
HE
O
UN
EN
m
m
nd
TC
.5
.7
x4
x2
LO
wi
KI
1m
4m
P
20 2 BED
m
gh
7.
3.
.2
S
NY
O
x2
EN
R
Hi
NY
.
BE
6m
.m
W
O
RY
2.
O
LC
RY
Sq
m
LC
.6
21 2 BED
.6
L'D
x2
BA
L'D
x1
97
BA
6m
TR
6m
1.
2.
EN
M
S
W
O
G
+
TH
m
.6
E
IN
x2
77 ED
m G
BA
N
.
3m
UN
DI
Y
2.
q.
UD
B
x6
LO
S
6m
ST
1
4.
A
NG
1
RY
NI
4m ED
m
m
L'D
o.
.5
9
5.
DI
x2
St
B
x
D
M
1m
W
2.
D
-E TCH
d
P
Cp
m
O
.4
KI
W
f
Re
8m N
x3
2.
A
R
NY
BALCO
indow
Y
High w
NY
BALCO E BEDx 4.32m NY
LOUx 6.N2mG BALCO
BEDx 4.22m
3.7m
4.3m
3.1m
NY BEDx 5.16m
BALCO
3 BED
3.7m
E
LOUNG BED 2
GA CIL L
RD ITY
.m.
O FA TIA
116 Sq
4m 3m
4m x 7. 3.2m x
EN
RO ARE DEN
DINxIN G BEDx 5.16m DINING NG
LOxU5.8m
E
S
C SI
NGE
3.6m 3.7m
+
2 BED KITCH
3.4m 4m
RE
LOUx 4m BATH Sto. WM
WO
F
BED4.9m1 3.9m
+S . 2m -EN
99 Sq.m
1.9m x
P
1 BED
P
4m x
NSx 2.2m
E6m ATx H
B9m 2.2m
L'DRx 2.Y2m Ref
x 3.8m
3m
DINING
. 1. 1.6m
81 Sq.m EN
2.
KITCH
3 BED
P
E
STUDY DINING ENTRY
3.3m x
2.2m WO
BL
NY .
BALCO
WO
L'DR1.Y6m .m
122 Sq
A
4
STAIR
Ref
HEN
O FIC
2.3m x
NSx 2.2m KITC Sto.
TR N
P E6m WM
HEN x 2.9m
Sto.
NO
RO AF
2. 3.2m
KITC
F
ATx H
B1m 2.1m
x 2.7m
3.7m
ENTRY Ref ENTRY LIFT LIFT 2
3.
KITCH
WO Ref Sto. ATx H
B9m OVER
BED5m3
WO
L'DRx 1.Y6m NSx 2.6m 1.9m
E2m
ENTRY
WM WM 1.
-EN P
L'DRx 2.Y1m
WM
2.6m WO
P 2. 4m x 3. RUN
x 3.1m Ref
L'DxR2.Y6m
3m Cpd
Ref WM 2.1m 0m 2 5 10 15m
E Sto. EN
LOUx 5.N6mG Sto. KIT3.C4mHx 2.7m
1.6m
S C A L E: 1:200
shelf
4.7m Sto. L2.'D RY1m

1m x 2.
ENTRY
B'FAST ENTRY NSx 2.6m
E2m
2 BED BEDx 4.23m
.
3 BED 99 Sq.m
3.4m
BED6m1
LE
2.
DINING
AB
. LIFT E 4m x
1 20 Sq.m BAxT1.H LOUNG DINING
7 Re-issue to council 09.03.17
STORE
O FIC
4.5m
7.1m x
TR ON
8m
2m
NSx 2.6m
E2m
RO AF
Sto. ATx H LIFT 6 DA submission 22.09.16
F
B9m 2.
LOBBY
1.9m
1.
BED 1
T
.414 5 Preliminary Issue 08.09.16
BEDx 4.27m
AN
RL. 56 Louvre 3.6m x
6.3m
BEDx 3m3
PL
3.8m
3.9m
BED4.22m 3 Preliminary Issue 08.06.16
3.4m x
BED6m1
NY
4m x
BALCO 2 Preliminary Issue 20.04.16
Cpd
STAIR
No. Amendment Date
Project
E
BL
A
O FIC
TR N
NO
RO AF
F
Drawing
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
ST
AI
R
3
Calvary Ryde
B O U N D A R Y
Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale 1:200 @ A1
Amendment 7
Roof
overhang
Roof
overhang
Balcony
below
Roof
overhang
V
I C
Balcony
below
LIFT
OVERRUN Roof
T
overhang
O
Roof
overhang
R
17
03
0
I A
Balcony
below
Roof
overhang Roof
overhang
B
12
00
R
U
O
N
A
D
D
A
00
12
Roof overhang
R
Balcony
below
Y
Balcony
below
Roof overhang
Balcony
g from
below verhan
720 O l roof above
e ta
the m
ROOF GARDEN -
refer to Landscape
0
drawings for details
60
ROOF
17030
0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200
LIFT
0
60
OVERRUN
Roof 4 Re-isuue to Council 09.03.17

overhang PLANT
1200
2 Roof design modified 15.09.16

No. Amendment Date
1360
Roof Project
overhang
Pergola
0
60
Drawing
ROOF PLAN
ROOF
Calvary Ryde
B O U N D A R Y

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
Date SEP 2016 Job No. : Drawing

Scale 1:200 @ A1
Amendment 4
9
-
8
-
7
-
4
- 6
-
Stair shaft & Lift

CR overrun beyond CR CR KEY PLAN
Ceiling Level BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 PC1
BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 ML ML
RL. 59.114 AD ML W ML W W ML ML W W ML ML W ML W W W ML W W ML W W ML W ML W
2700
3rd. Floor BR1 BR1

6111
RL. 56.414 PC1

BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 BR1 BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 BR1 BR1 PC1
8m height line
4114
ML W W W W W W W W
ML ML ML ML ML ML W W W ML ML ML ML
2nd. Floor
14111
BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 BR1 BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 BR1 BR1 PC1
RL. 52.300
3600
ML W W W W W W W W
ML ML ML ML ML ML W W W ML ML ML ML
1st. Floor
PC1 PC1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1
RL. 48.700 BR1 PC1
4200
W AD W ML W AD ML W W ML W AD AD W W W ML W ML W ML W
Ground Floor EGL
EGL
RL. 44.500 FGL FGL FGL
Glass Porte
3300
Cochere over
FGL
Basement Floor
RL. 41.200
LEGEND
AD ALUMINIUM FRAMED DOORS
W WINDOWS
ELEVATION 1 BR1 RENDERED & PAINTED WALL -
COLOUR 1
BR2 RENDERED & PAINTED WALL -

COLOUR 2
CR CORRUGATED PREFINISHED
METAL ROOFING
DP DOWN PIPE
EGL EXISTING GROUND LINE
FC FIBRE CEMENT CLADDING
FGL FINISHED GROUND LINE
ML METAL LOUVRE
MLD METAL LOUVRE DOOR
PC1 PRE FINISHED WALL CLADDING

COLOUR 1

COLOUR 2
RS ROLLER SHUTTER
RW RETAINING WALL
0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200
Ceiling Level
RL. 59.114
3rd. Floor
5214
2 DA Submission 22.09.16
RL. 56.414 1 Preliminary Issue 08.06.16
No. Amendment Date
4114
13214
2nd. Floor Project
RL. 52.300
3600
1st. Floor Drawing
RL. 48.700
ELEVATIONS 1 & 2
4200
Ground Floor
RL. 44.500
3300
Basement Floor
RL. 41.200
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
ELEVATION 2 AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
Date JUNE 2016 Job No. : Drawing

Scale 1:200
Amendment 3
9
-
8
-
7
-
4
- 6
-
Ceiling Level
KEY PLAN
RL. 59.114
2700
3rd. Floor
7349
RL. 56.414
4114
2nd. Floor
15349
RL. 52.300
3600
1st. Floor
RL. 48.700
4200
Ground Floor
RL. 44.500
3300
Basement Floor
RL. 41.200
LEGEND
W WINDOWS
ELEVATION 3 BR1 RENDERED & PAINTED WALL -

COLOUR 1

COLOUR 2
METAL ROOFING
DP DOWN PIPE
ML METAL LOUVRE

COLOUR 1

COLOUR 2
RS ROLLER SHUTTER
RW RETAINING WALL
Stair shaft & Pergola on the roof Pergola Stair shaft

Lift overrun refer to Landscape
drawings
CR CR CR CR CR 0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200
Ceiling Level BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 PC1 PC1 BR1 BR1 BR1
PC1
W BR1 ML
RL. 59.114 W W W W AD AD W W W W ML 3 Re-issue to Council 09.03.17
2700
BR1 BR1
3rd. Floor BR1
7602
RL. 56.414 PC1 PC1 BR1 BR1 BR1 PC1 PC1 PC2 BR1 PC1 PC1 PC1 PC1
BR1 No. Amendment Date
4114
W W
W W W AD AD W W W W W W W W AD W W W
Project
2nd. Floor 8m height line BR1 CALVARY RYDE RCF & ILU
15601
PC1 BR1 BR1 BR1 PC1 PC1 PC2 BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 PC1 PC1 678 Victoria Road, Ryde
RL. 52.300
W W
3600
W W W AD AD W W W W W W W W AD W W W
Drawing
1st. Floor PC1 BR1 ELEVATIONS 3 & 4
RL. 48.700 PC1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 PC2 BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 PC1 PC1
4200
W W W W AD AD W AD W W MLD W W W W W AD W W W
Ground Floor BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2
EGL
RL. 44.500 BR2 BR2 PC1 PC1 PC1
3300
FGL BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2

Basement Floor RS RS MLD MLD
Canopy over FGL FGL EML
RL. 41.200 FGL

Calvary Ryde
Canopy over

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
ELEVATION 4 Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale 1:200
Amendment 3
9
-
8
-
7
-
4
- 6
-
CR Stair shaft Stair shaft
Ceiling Level KEY PLAN

PC1
RL. 59.114 W W W ML ML
2700
ILU
3rd. Floor PC2 BR1 PC1 BR1
RL. 56.414 PC1 PC1

4114
COR. RCF - 1 BED-S

W W W W W W W AD W W W
2nd. Floor
7000
RL. 52.300 PC1 PC2 BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1
3600
COR. RCF - 1 BED-S W W W W W W W AD W W W W

1st. Floor 8m height line
15000
RL. 48.700 PC1 PC2 BR1 PC1 BR1 PC1 PC1
4200
ACTIVITY GYM AD
AD W W W W W W W W
Ground Floor BR2 BR2
RL. 44.500 EGL

3300
Basement Floor CARPARK FGL

FGL ML
RL. 41.200 EGL
EGL
Garden
Canopy over
LEGEND
W WINDOWS

COLOUR 1

ELEVATION 5 COLOUR 2
METAL ROOFING
DP DOWN PIPE
ML METAL LOUVRE

COLOUR 1

COLOUR 2
RS ROLLER SHUTTER
RW RETAINING WALL
0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200

No. Amendment Date
Project
Drawing
ELEVATIONS 5 & 6
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
ELEVATION 6 Date Job No. : Drawing

JUNE 2016
Scale 1:200
Amendment 3
9
-
8
-
7
-
4
- 6
-
KEY PLAN
LEGEND
W WINDOWS

COLOUR 1

ELEVATION 7 ELEVATION 8 COLOUR 2
METAL ROOFING
DP DOWN PIPE
ML METAL LOUVRE

COLOUR 1

COLOUR 2
RS ROLLER SHUTTER
RW RETAINING WALL
0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200

No. Amendment Date
Project
Drawing
ELEVATIONS 7, 8 & 9
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
ELEVATION 9 Date Job No. : Drawing

JUNE 2016
Scale 1:200
Amendment 3
F
-
H
-
BOUNDARY
CHANGE IN
DIRECTION
NEIGHBOURING BUILDING
RL.66.50
D C B A I
-
RL.65.485 - - - -
Roof Plan
RL. 64.885 KEY PLAN
3100
Level 7
RL. 61.785
3100
Ceiling Level
Level 6
RL. 59.114
2700
RL. 58.685
3000
3rd. Floor PLANT
Level 5
RL. 56.414
RL. 55.685
4115
8 STOREY
3000
1 BED ENS ST. CORR. ENS 1 BED GROUND FLOOR RL. 40.685
2nd. Floor Level 4
7100
RL. 52.300 RL. 52.685
3000
15100
3600
1 BED ENS ST. CORR. ENS 1 BED Level 3

1st. Floor
RL. 49.685
3000
RL. 48.700
Level 2
4200
1 BED ENS ST. CORR. ENS 1 BED RL. 46.685
3000
Ground Floor
Level 1
RL. 44.500
3300
CARPARK Footpath RL. 43.685
3000
Basement
Basement
Floor Floor
RL.40.685 Ground Floor
RL. 41.200
RL. 40.685
3000
Basement 1
RL. 37.685
2985
Basement 2
RL. 34.700
SECTION A
BOUNDARY
RL.66.50
RL.65.485
Roof Plan
RL. 64.885 0m 2 5 10 15m
3100
S C A L E: 1:200
Level 7
RL. 61.785
3100
Ceiling Level
Level 6 3 DA submission 22.09.16
RL. 59.114 LIFT
2700
OVER RL. 58.685
3000
3rd. Floor ROOF GARDEN RUN 1 Preliminary Issue 26.05.16
Level 5 No. Amendment Date

RL. 56.414
RL. 55.685 Project
1785
4115
8 STOREY
3000
LIFT
DINING DINING LIFT 8m height line GROUND FLOOR RL. 40.685 CALVARY RYDE RCF & ILU
2nd. Floor Level 4
LOBBY 678 Victoria Road, Ryde
RL. 52.300 RL. 52.685
3000
Drawing
8970
3600
9785
DINING DINING LIFT LIFT

Level 3 SECTIONS A & B
LOBBY
1st. Floor
RL. 49.685 SHEET 1
3000
RL. 48.700
Level 2
4200
ENTRY LIFT LIFT

LOBBY RL. 46.685
3000
Ground Floor
Level 1
RL. 44.500
3300
CARPARK LIFT LIFT SERVICE LOBBY RL. 43.685
3000
Basement Floor LOBBY
RL. 41.200 Calvary Ryde
RL. 40.685 Retirement Community
3000
Basement 1
RL. 37.685
2985
Basement 2
Chatswood NSW 2067
RL. 34.700 AUSTRALIA
SECTION B Tel. (02) 9406 7000

Fax. (02) 9406 7099
Date APR 2016 Job No. : Drawing

Scale 1:200
Drawn WW / AL 1602 / DA13
Amendment 4
F
-
BOUNDARY
H
CHANGE IN
-
DIRECTION
RL.66.50
RL.65.485
Roof Plan
Plant
RL. 64.885
3100
Level 7 D C B A I
-
- - - -
RL. 61.785
3100
Ceiling Level KEY PLAN
Level 6
RL. 59.114
2700
RL. 58.685
3000
3rd. Floor
Level 5
7150
RL. 56.414
8m height line RL. 55.685
4115
8 STOREY
3000
GROUND FLOOR RL. 40.685
2nd. Floor Level 4
15150
RL. 52.300 RL. 52.685
3000
3600
Level 3
1st. Floor
RL. 49.685
3000
RL. 48.700
EXIST.
ST. ANNE'S WING
Level 2
4200
RL. 46.685
3000
Ground Floor Footpath
DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
Level 1
RL. 44.500
3300
RL. 43.685
3000
Basement Floor
RL. 41.200
RL. 40.685
3000
Basement 1
RL. 37.685
2985
Basement 2
RL. 34.700
BOUNDARY
0m 2 5 10 15m
Plant S C A L E: 1:200

Ceiling Level 2 Preliminary Issue 08.06.16
RL. 59.114 ILU - 2 BED + S CORR. LIFT
2700
No. Amendment Date

3rd. Floor
5085
6575
Project
6505
RL. 56.414
8m height line CALVARY RYDE RCF & ILU
4115
BALC. RCF - 1 BED-S ENS CORR. ST. LIFT 678 Victoria Road, Ryde
13085
2nd. Floor
14575
Drawing
RL. 52.300 Existing St. Anne's wing
to be demolished
SECTIONS C, D & E
3600
BALC. RCF - 1 BED-S ENS CORR. ST. LIFT SHEET 2

1st. Floor
RL. 48.700 EXIST.

ST. ANNE'S WING
4200
ILU - 3 BED + S CORR. LIFT

Footpath
Ground Floor
RL. 44.500
3300
PLANT / DRY COOL

Basement Floor STORE CARPARK LIFT STORE ROOM STORE CORR. Calvary Ryde
RL. 41.200

Chatswood NSW 2067
SECTION D AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale 1:200
Amendment 4
F
-
H
-
PLANT
D C B A I
-
- - - -
KEY PLAN
2700
2 BED + S CORR. STO. STAIR 2
6185
6815
7300
8m height line
4115
15300
8m height line 1 BED-L ENS CORR. LDY. STAIR 2
14380
14815
8m height line
3600
1 BED-L ENS CORR. LDY. STAIR 2
Courtyard to
STAIR 2 Landscape architect's
DRIVEWAY
4200
Existing ground line drawings for details

ILU ENTRY ST.
3300
PLANT STAIR 2
SECTION G
0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200

3rd. Floor No. Amendment Date
RL. 56.414 Project
4115

2nd. Floor
8m height line Drawing
RL. 52.300
SECTIONS F,G & H
3600
1st. Floor SHEET 3
RL. 48.700
4200
Ground Floor
RL. 44.500
VICTORIA ROAD
3300
Basement Floor
Calvary Ryde
RL. 41.200 Retirement Community
SECTION H Suite 7, Level 1 Epica, 9 Railway Street

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale 1:200
Amendment 4
BOUNDARY
RL.66.50
RL.65.485
DALTON HOUSE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY &

Ceiling Level
RL.59.22
RL.58.48 Roof garden

RL. 59.14 ILU - to Landscape architect's
2700
1 BED+S drawings for details PLANT

3rd. Floor
RL. 56.414
4115
8 STOREY
Exist. St. Margaret's wing VOID DINING CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR SITTING / GROUND FLOOR RL. 40.685
2nd. Floor EXIST. CHAPEL to be demolished ACTIVITY
RL. 52.300 RL.51.33

3600
1st. Floor
DINING CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR SITTING /
ACTIVITY
8m height line
RL. 48.700 Exist. CHAPEL
RL.47.17 Floor RL. 45.99 DENSE VEGETATION
TIMBER GAZEBO
4200
DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY CAFETERIA

RL. 45.68 RL.45.68 ENTRY STORE SERVICE CORRIDOR QUIET /
Ground Floor 2 STOREY BRICK UNITS 2 STOREY BRICK UNITS XAVIER APARTMENTS MULTI STOREY BRICK UNITS CORRIDOR SITTING
RL. 44.500
3300
CARPARK CARPARK CARPARK

Basement Floor
RL.40.685
RL. 41.200
SECTION THROUGH SITE (EAST TO WEST)

SCALE 1:650
DALTON HOUSE
Ceiling Level
RL. 59.14
2700
3rd. Floor
RL. 56.414
4115
2nd. Floor EXIST. CHAPEL

RL. 52.300 RL.51.33
3600
1st. Floor
RL. 48.700 Exist. CHAPEL

Floor RL. 45.99
TIMBER GAZEBO
4200
RL. 45.68 RL.45.68
Ground Floor MULTI STOREY BRICK UNITS

RL. 44.500
3300
Basement Floor
RL. 41.200
SECTION THROUGH SITE

PART 1 SCALE 1:200
RL.66.50
RL.65.485
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY & 0m 2 5 10 15m

S C A L E: 1:200
Roof garden
ILU - to Landscape architect's 1 Preliminary Issue 26.05.16
1 BED+S drawings for details PLANT No. Amendment Date
Project
8 STOREY
Exist. St. Margaret's wing VOID DINING CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR SITTING / GROUND FLOOR RL. 40.685 678 Victoria Road, Ryde
to be demolished ACTIVITY
Drawing
SITE SECTION (SECTION I)
DINING CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR SITTING /
8m height line SHEET 4
ACTIVITY
DENSE VEGETATION
DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY CAFETERIA
ENTRY STORE SERVICE CORRIDOR QUIET /
CORRIDOR SITTING
CARPARK CARPARK CARPARK

Calvary Ryde
RL.40.685 Retirement Community

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
SECTION THROUGH SITE
PART 2 SCALE 1:200 Date APR 2016 Job No. : Drawing
Scale 1:200
Amendment 4
Exist. Exist. Exist.

St. MARY POTTER St. MARY POTTER St. MARY POTTER
NURSING HOME NURSING HOME NURSING HOME
VIC
VIC
PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED
TOR
TOR
BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING
IA
IA
ROA
ROA
D
D
B O U N D A R Y B O U N D A R Y B O U N D A R Y
SHADOW DIAGRAM - 9 AM SHADOW DIAGRAM - 12 PM SHADOW DIAGRAM - 3 PM

3 Shadow with trees 30.09.16
No. Amendment Date
Project
Drawing
SHADOW DIAGRAM - JUNE 21 WINTER
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale 1:750
Drawn JN 1602 / DA17
Amendment 4
STAGING PLAN
PHASE A PHASE B
1. Cut off exist. driveway 5. Build proposed building
each side including basement
exist. MARY POTTER
2. Build temporary roundabout exist. MARY POTTER
6. Build new landscape
NURSING HOME
to allow access to exist. NURSING HOME
separation to eastern
V I
V I
Mary Potter building boundary
C T
C T
3. Build temporary turning bay 7. Demolish temporary turning
O R
O R
exist.
exist. 4. Demolish all of St. Anne's exist.
exist.
bay
I A
I A
St. JOSEPH'S WING St. JOSEPH'S WING
St.MARGARET'S WING St.MARGARET'S WING
wing and link corridors
R O
R O
B O
B O
A D
A D
U N
U N
exist. exist.
St.ANNE'S WING St.ANNE'S WING
D A
D A
R Y
R Y
LEGEND
Boundary line
6
Demolition line
Existing Building, driveway
Demolition building, driveway
Proposed building, driveway
Proposed basement
Completed works
PHASE C PHASE D
8. Demolish St. Joseph's 10. Demolish temporary
& St. Margaret's wings roundabout
Mary potter
converted to
COMMUNITY CENTRE
of Mary Potter building
Mary potter
converted to
COMMUNITY CENTRE
11. Build proposed driveway
9. convert existing building & complete landscape
V I
V I
to new mary potter works
C T
C T
0m 10 20 30 50 60m
community centre
O R
O R
I A
I A
Refer to No. Amendment Date
Project
Temporary Access Plan
R O
R O
B O
B O
A D
A D
U N
U N
Drawing
STAGING PLAN
D A
D A
R Y
R Y
Calvary Ryde
B O U N D A R Y

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale 1:800 @ A1
Amendment 3
TEMPORARY ACCESS PLAN

CONSTRUCTION 1 CONSTRUCTION 2
1. Vacate residents from 4. Build temporary hoarding
St. Anne's wing and pedestrian pathway
exist. MARY POTTER
2. Build temporary turning bay exist. MARY POTTER
access to proposed building
NURSING HOME
at cut-off roadway NURSING HOME
5. Use new driveway to
V I
V I
3. Build temporary roundabout basement level
C T
C T
and access to
O R
O R
exist.
exist. Mary Potter building exist.
exist. NOTE: Independent Living Unit
I A
I A
St. JOSEPH'S WING St. JOSEPH'S WING
St.MARGARET'S WING St.MARGARET'S WING
will not be commissioned

until completion
R O
R O
B O
B O
A D
A D
U N
U N
exist.
St.ANNE'S WING
D A
D A
R Y
R Y
LEGEND
Boundary line
Demolition line
Access Sign
Existing Building, driveway
Demolition building, driveway
Proposed building, driveway
Proposed basement
Completed works
CONSTRUCTION 3 COMPLETION
6. Vacate the rest of Mary 7. Complete works to new
Potter nursing home Mary Potter Community Centre
uilding Mary potter
converted to
COMMUNITY CENTRE
8. Complete works to ILUs to
create new entries
V I
V I
C T
C T
0m 10 20 30 50 60m
O R
O R
I A
I A
sioned No. Amendment Date
Project
R O
R O
B O
B O
A D
A D
U N
U N
Drawing
TEMPORARY ACCESS PLAN
D A
D A
R Y
R Y
Calvary Ryde
B O U N D A R Y

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale 1:800 @ A1
Amendment 2
BUILDING 1 - MID WINTER
SHADOW DIAGRAM - 1 PM SHADOW DIAGRAM - 2 PM SHADOW DIAGRAM - 3 PM
Existing building
converted to
Community Centre
BUILDING 1 - EQUINOX
PROPOSED
RCF & ILU

No. Amendment Date
BUILDING 2 BUILDING 1 Project

Drawing
SHADOW DIAGRAM - BUILDING 1
SHADOW DIAGRAM - 2 PM SHADOW DIAGRAM - 3 PM KEY PLAN MID WINTER / EQUINOX
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale NTS
Amendment 1
BUILDING 2 - MID WINTER
SHADOW DIAGRAM - 1 PM SHADOW DIAGRAM - 2 PM SHADOW DIAGRAM - 3 PM
Existing building
converted to
Community Centre
BUILDING 2 - EQUINOX
PROPOSED
RCF & ILU

No. Amendment Date
BUILDING 2 BUILDING 1 Project

Drawing
SHADOW DIAGRAM - BUILDING 2
SHADOW DIAGRAM - 2.30 PM SHADOW DIAGRAM - 3 PM KEY PLAN MID WINTER / EQUINOX
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099

Scale NTS
Amendment 1
P
D
R
R
O
I
P
V
O
E
S
W
E
A
D
Y
PUBLIC
WC ENTRY
FLOWERS CHAPEL
PASTORAL
D.O.N CARE
OFFICE RECEPTION
STORE TEA ROOM
V
MEETING SPACE
FHR
I
MORT. EX.FHR
C
HOLDING
HAIRDRESSER
T
KITCHEN
MALE
O
STAFF WC
PLANT
STORE ROOM
R
KITCHEN
STORE
STORE CO
I
RR STO
ID 3
OR
I DOR BULK
A
2 R STORE
C OR
LAUNDRY
FEMALE
CLNR
STAFF WC
STAFF
DINING
WALKWAY 2
WALKWAY 1
MEDICATION
R
B
LOUNGE MEDICATION
ED
NURSE
O
STATION
NURSE
A
UTILITY
COURTYARD STATION DINING
WARD 8 UTILITY
D
FHR LINEN
LINEN FHR
DOCTOR / Existing St. Joseph's wing
THERAPIST & St. Margaret's wing
to be demolished
WARD 7
shown dotted
BATHROOM 2 WARD 14
WC
WARD 9 LOUNGE
SHOWER BAYS
& TOILETS
CLNR
BATH
CLNR WARD 6
ST BATH
JO SPA
SE CLNR
WARD 10 P H'S SHOWER
W DIVERSIONAL ROOM
WING
IN THERAPY
G WARD 2
ET'S
R
RGA WARD 5
WARD 12 CORRI
MA
-DOR 7 ST
COURTYARD WARD 3
WARD 11
PRELIMINARY
WARD 4
LINK 1
B
LINK 2
0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200
O
Existing St. Anne's wing
to be demolished
CORRIDOR
U
WARD 19
PASTORAL
N
CARE WARD 17
WC
No. Amendment Date
EDB
D
WARD 15 HWU WARD 31
CLEAN WARD 25
FHR STO WARD 21 WARD 29
BATH
BATH UTILITY LOUNGE AIR Project
FHR
A
LOCK WARD 23 CALVARY RYDE RCF & ILU
EDB
WARD 27 CLNR
FIP NURSE
ENTRY CORRIDOR STATION
BATH 678 Victoria Road, Ryde
WC BATH
R
FHR BATH
Drawing
STO
ST ANNE'S WING
Y
MARY POTTER COMMUNITY CENTRE -
NAL BATH WARD 16
BATH
WARD 20
BATH
WC SERVERY DIRTY BATH
CORRIDOR
SOLARIUM
PROPOSED
RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY /
DEMOLITION PLAN
UTILITY BATH
WARD 18
A D
WARD 26
WARD 30
BATH
INDEPENDENT LIVING UNIT
Y
WARD 14
W E
WARD 22 DINING WARD 28 GROUND RL.44.50

S
ROOM
WARD 24
O
WARD 32
E
Calvary Ryde
P
V
R O
I
R
P
D

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
Date JAN 2017 Job No. : Drawing

Scale 1:200 @ A1
Amendment 1
P
D
R
R
O
I
P
V
O
E
S
W
E
A
D
Y
WC /
SHR
CRAFT CHAPEL
exist. RL.45.99
GYM
PASTORAL
CARE
V
CHAPEL
EXPANSION WC
I
AREA
C
WC
SKYLIGHT LIBRARY
T
WC
TEA
O
R
SKYLIGHT
RECEPTION
UNDERCROFT
I
A
SKYLIGHT
SKYLIGHT
R
RL.44.70
Screens Screens Screens
O
A
D
PRELIMINARY
B
0m 2 5 10 15m
S C A L E: 1:200
O
U
N
No. Amendment Date
D
E D Project
O S A Y
A
P CALVARY RYDE RCF & ILU
R O E W 678 Victoria Road, Ryde
P I V
R
Existing St. Anne's wing
D R to be demolished Drawing
Y
MARY POTTER COMMUNITY CENTRE -
PROPOSED PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY /
INDEPENDENT LIVING UNIT
GROUND RL.44.50
Calvary Ryde

Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9406 7000
Fax. (02) 9406 7099
Date JAN 2017 Job No. : Drawing

Scale 1:200 @ A1
Amendment 1
APPENDIX B
Borehole Logs
BOREHOLE: BH101
Project Proposed Residential Care Facility & Units
Location 678 Victoria Road, Ryde, NSW Sheet 1 OF 1
Position Refer to Figure 2 Date Started 10/2/17
Job No. E23061 Contractor Geosense Drilling Pty Ltd Date Completed 10/2/17
Client Donald Cant Watts Corke (DCWC) Drill Rig Hanjin D&B Logged JH Date:
Inclination -90° Checked Date:
Drilling Sampling Field Material Description
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty CLAY; low to medium plasticity, pale brown, with FILL
BH101_0.10.2 ES some fine, sub-angular to angular gravels, no odour.
0.30 PID = 3.2 ppm
From 0.3m, red mottled pale brown/grey.
BH101_0.5-0.6 ES
QD3 QT3
PID = 3.7 ppm
1 BH101_0.9-1.0 ES
PID = 2.1 ppm
GWNE
AD/T
- D -
BH101_1.5-1.6 ES
1.70 PID = 1.9 ppm
- SHALE; pale brown to pale grey, inferred extremely WEATHERED ROCK
weathered, no odour.
2 BH101_1.9-2.0 ES
PID = 2.3 ppm
BH101_2.9-3.0 ES
3.00 PID = 1.7 ppm
3
Hole Terminated at 3.00 m
Target Depth Reached.
Backfilled with Drilling Spoil.
EIA LIB 1.03.GLB Log IS AU BOREHOLE 3 E23061 BOREHOLE LOGS.GPJ <<DrawingFile>> 16/02/2017 12:30 8.30.004 Datgel Lab and In Situ Tool - DGD | Lib: EIA 1.03 2014-07-05 Prj: EIA 1.03 2014-07-05
10
This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.
BOREHOLE: BH102
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
-
DT
- ASPHALT: 70mm thick. PAVEMENT

BH102_0.1-0.2 ES - FILL
PID = 3.8 ppm FILL: Gravelly SAND; fine grained, pale brown/pale grey, with
fine to coarse, sub-angular gravels, no odour.
0.50
BH102_0.5-0.6 ES - FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown, with fine,
PID = 3.5 ppm sub-angular to angular gravels, no odour.
1
BH102_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 3.9 ppm
BH102_1.5-1.6 ES
PID = 2.1 ppm
GWNE
AD/T
- 2 -
BH102_2.0-2.1 ES D
PID = 3.8 ppm
BH102_2.5-2.6 ES
PID = 2.7 ppm
3
BH102_3.0-3.1 ES
PID = 2.9 ppm
3.50
BH102_3.5-3.6 ES - FILL: SAND; medium to coarse grained, grey, no odour.
PID = 2.5 ppm
BH102_4.0-4.1 ES
4 4.10 PID = 3.1 ppm

Potential Drainage Pipe.
10
BOREHOLE: BH103
Job No. E23061 Contractor EI Australia Date Completed 10/2/17
Client Donald Cant Watts Corke (DCWC) Drill Rig Hand Auger Logged JH Date:
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL
GWNE
FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, brown, with fine,

HA
- BH103_0.1-0.2 ES sub-angular to angular gravels and rootlets, no odour. D -

0.35 PID = 4.2 ppm
Refusal.
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH104
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- CONCRETE HARDSTAND
DT
0.18 CONCRETE: 180mm thick. -

BH104_0.2-0.3 ES - FILL: Sandy CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown, sand is FILL
0.40 PID = 3 ppm fine grained, no odour.
0.50 CI RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty Sandy CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown, with fine
- WEATHERED ROCK
BH104_0.6-0.7 ES grained sand and extremely weathered shale fragments, no
PID = 2.9 ppm odour.
GWNE
SHALE; pale brown to pale grey, inferred extremely

AD/T
- 1 weathered, no odour. -
D
BH104_1.7-1.8 ES
PID = 2.1 ppm
2.00
2
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH105W

PIEZOMETER DETAILS
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
ID Static Water Level
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
MOISTURE
BH105W
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
BH105W
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- Gatic Cover
DT
0.17 CONCRETE: 170mm thick. -

- in Concrete
BH105W_0.2-0.3 ES FILL: Sandy CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown, sand is
0.40 PID = 2.9 ppm fine grained, no odour.
CI-
CH Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red to grey, with
0.70 BH105W_0.6-0.7 ES shale fragments, no odour.
PID = 3.1 ppm - SHALE; pale red to grey, inferred extremely weathered, no
odour.
1
BH105W_1.2-1.3 ES Cuttings
PID = 3.7 ppm
50 mm uPVC
Casing
BH105W_2.2-2.3 ES
PID = 1.9 ppm
Bentonite
GWNE
3
AD/T
- -
D
3.50
From 3.5m, pale grey, inferred distinctly to slightly weathered.
Sand
50 mm uPVC
Screen
6
6.20 Collapse
Refusal.
Borehole Converted into Monitoring Well.
10
BOREHOLE: BH106
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty Gravelly CLAY; medium plasticity, brown, with fine FILL
BH106_0.1-0.2 ES to coarse, sub-angular to angular gravels and rootlets, no
0.40
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red-pale
BH106_0.5-0.6 ES grey, no odour.
PID = 4.3 ppm
0.90
GWNE
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red/brown mottled RESIDUAL SOIL
AD/T
- 1 M -
CH red/grey, no odour.
BH106_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 2.1 ppm
1.40
From 1.4m, pale grey mottled orange.
BH106_2.0-2.1 ES
2 2.10 PID = 1.7 ppm
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH107
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, brown, with fine, FILL
GWNE
0.20 BH107_0.1-0.2 ES
HA
- sub-angular to angular gravels and rootlets, no odour. M -

PID = 2.3 ppm -
0.40 FILL: Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red-pale
grey, no odour.
Refusal.
1
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH108
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty SAND; fine grained, brown, with sub-angular FILL
BH108_0.1-0.2 ES gravels and rootlets, no odour.
0.35 PID = 2.8 ppm
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red/brown-pale brown, RESIDUAL SOIL
GWNE
CH
HA
- 0.60 BH108_0.5-0.6 ES no odour. M -

PID = 1.9 ppm From 0.6m, red to red/brown mottled pale grey.
BH108_1.0-1.1 ES
1 1.10 PID = 2.2 ppm
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH109
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
-
DT

BH109_0.1-0.2 ES - FILL
PID = 3.8 ppm FILL: Gravelly SAND; fine grained, grey, with fine,
- sub-angular, no odour.
FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown to pale red
0.70 BH109_0.5-0.6 ES mottled grey, no odour.
PID = 2.1 ppm CI- RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale brown to pale grey
CH
GWNE
mottled red/brown, no odour.

AD/T
- 1 BH109_0.9-1.0 ES -
PID = 2.3 ppm D
1.60
- SHALE; pale brown to pale grey, inferred extremely WEATHERED ROCK
BH109_1.9-2.0 ES weathered, no odour.
2.00 PID = 3.1 ppm
2
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH110
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
-
DT

BH110_0.1-0.2 ES - FILL
0.30 PID = 5.3 ppm FILL: Sandy GRAVEL; fine, sub-angular to angular, dark grey,
- with fine grained sand, no odour.
BH110_0.5-0.6 ES FILL: Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale brown to
PID = 4.1 ppm brown, trace of fine, sub-angular to sub-rounded gravels, no
odour.
0.90
1 CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red/brown mottled RESIDUAL SOIL
GWNE
BH110_1.0-1.1 ES CH
AD/T
- red/grey, no odour. -
PID = 2.2 ppm D
1.70
- SHALE; pale red to grey, inferred extremely weathered, no WEATHERED ROCK
odour.
2
BH110_2.1-2.1 ES
PID = 2.5 ppm
2.30
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH111
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty SAND; fine grained, pale brown, trace of low to FILL
BH111_0.1-0.2 ES medium plasticity clay and fine, sub-angular to angular
PID = 3.7 ppm gravels, no odour.
BH111_0.5-0.6 ES
0.80 PID = 3.2 ppm
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown to brown, no
1 odour.
BH111_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 2.8 ppm
1.30
From 1.3m, pale brown to brown, with red banding.
GWNE
AD/T
- BH111_1.5-1.6 ES D -
PID = 3.2 ppm
1.80
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red to red, no RESIDUAL SOIL
2 CH odour.
BH111_2.0-2.1 ES
PID = 1.9 ppm
3 BH111_3.0-3.1 ES
3.20 PID = 1.8 ppm
10
BOREHOLE: BH112
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty Gravelly SAND; fine to coarse grained, brown to FILL
BH112_0.1-0.2 ES dark brown, with fine sub-angular to angular gravels,no odour.
PID = 4.2 ppm M
0.50
BH112_0.5-0.6 ES - FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, red with grey bands, no
0.90
1 From 0.9m, red/grey.
BH112_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 2.9 ppm
GWNE
1.50
AD/T
- -
BH112_1.5-1.6 ES CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red, no odour. RESIDUAL SOIL
PID = 2.8 ppm CH
D
2.00
2
From 2.0m, red mottled grey.
BH112_2.8-2.9 ES
3.00 PID = 1.8 ppm
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH113
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty SAND; fine grained, brown, with sub-angular FILL
BH113_0.1-0.2 ES gravels and rootlets, no odour.
PID = 3.9 ppm
0.40
GWNE
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red mottled pale RESIDUAL SOIL
HA
- BH113_0.5-0.6 ES CH M -
PID = 4.2 ppm grey/pale brown, no odour.
BH113_1.0-1.1 ES
1 1.10 PID = 2.9 ppm
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH114
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty SAND; fine grained, brown, with medium, FILL
BH114_0.1-0.2 ES sub-angular to sub-rounded gravels and rootlets, no odour.
0.30 PID = 5.3 ppm
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red-pale grey, no RESIDUAL SOIL
GWNE
BH114_0.4-0.5 ES CH odour.
HA
- PID = 3.1 ppm D -
BH114_1.0-1.1 ES
1 1.10 PID = 3 ppm
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH115
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
-
DT

BH115_0.1-0.2 ES - FILL
0.30 PID = 3.9 ppm FILL: Sandy GRAVEL; fine, sub-angular to angular, dark grey,
- with fine grained sand, no odour.
FILL: Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale brown to
BH115_0.5-0.6 ES brown, trace fine, sub-angular to sub-rounded gravels, no
1
BH115_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 3.2 ppm
1.30
GWNE
AD/T
- CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red/brown mottled - RESIDUAL SOIL
D
CH red/grey, no odour.
BH115_1.5-1.6 ES
PID = 1.2 ppm
BH115_2.5-2.6 ES
PID = 2.2 ppm
2.80
3 Target Depth Reached.
10
BOREHOLE: BH116
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown to brown, with FILL
BH116_0.1-0.2 ES rootlets, no odour.
PID = 3.7 ppm
0.60
BH116_0.5-0.6 ES
PID = 2.2 ppm From 0.6m, brown.
1
BH116_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 2.9 ppm
1.30
GWNE
AD/T
- CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red to grey, no D - RESIDUAL SOIL
CH odour.
BH116_1.5-1.6 ES
PID = 4.7 ppm
2
2.20
- SHALE: pale red to pale grey, inferred extremely weathered, WEATHERED ROCK
no odour.
BH116_2.5-2.6 ES
PID = 3.2 ppm
2.80
3 Target Depth Reached.
10
BOREHOLE: BH117W

PIEZOMETER DETAILS
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
MOISTURE
BH117W
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
BH117W
LOG
DEPTH Stickup = 0.95m
RL
0
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, brown, with trace fine,
BH117W_0.1-0.2 ES sub-angular to sub-rounded gravels, no odour.
PID = 5.3 ppm M
0.50
BH117W_0.5-0.6 ES - FILL: Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red/orange
PID = 4.2 ppm mottled grey, with trace fine, sub-angular to angular gravels,
no odour.
1.00
1
BH117W_1.0-1.1 ES - FILL: Gravelly SAND; fine to coarse grained, red/brown, with
PID = 3.7 ppm fine, sub-angular sandstone gravels, no odour.
BH117W_1.5-1.6 ES
PID = 3.1 ppm D-
1.80 M
- FILL: Silty Sandy CLAY; low to medium plasticity,
2 Cuttings
BH117W_2.0-2.1 ES
PID = 2.7 ppm
BH117W_2.5-2.6 ES 50 mm uPVC
PID = 1.9 ppm Casing
2.90
3 CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red, mottled pale grey,
BH117W_3.0-3.1 ES CH no odour.
PID = 1.7 ppm
4
BH117W_4.0-4.1 ES
GWNE
PID = 1.8 ppm

AD/T
- - Bentonite
5
5.20
- SHALE: red/brown to grey, inferred extremely weatheted, no
odour.
Sand
50 mm uPVC
Screen
Collapse
8.50
9
10
BOREHOLE: BH118
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty SAND; fine grained, brown, trace medium, D- FILL
0.20 BH118_0.1-0.2 ES M
sub-angular to sub-rounded gravels and rootlets, no odour.
PID = 2.1 ppm -
FILL: Silty Gravelly CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown
mottled red/orange, with fine, sub-angular to angular gravels,
BH118_0.5-0.6 ES no odour.
PID = 4.7 ppm
1 1.10 BH118_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 3.2 ppm From 1.1m, brick fragments.
1.40
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red to
BH118_1.5-1.6 ES red/brown motted orange, no odour.
PID = 1.9 ppm
GWNE
AD/T
- -
D
2
BH118_2.0-2.1 ES
PID = 2.7 ppm
2.30
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red, no odour. RESIDUAL SOIL
CH
BH118_2.5-2.6 ES
PID = 2.2 ppm
BH118_3.5-3.6 ES
3.60 PID = 2.5 ppm
10
BOREHOLE: BH119
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL
GWNE
FILL: Silty SAND; fine grained, brown, trace medium,

HA
- BH119_0.1-0.2 ES sub-angular to sub-rounded gravels and rootlets, no odour. M -

0.35 PID = 2.9 ppm
Refusal.
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH120W

PIEZOMETER DETAILS
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
MOISTURE
BH120W
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
BH120W
LOG
DEPTH Stickup = 0.95m
RL
0
- FILL: Silty Gravelly SAND; fine grained, pale brown to brown,
BH120W_0.1-0.2 ES with fine, sub-angular to sub-rounded gravels and rootlets, no
0.40
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, brown mottled red, no
BH120W_0.5-0.6 ES odour.
0.80 QD1 QT1
PID = 2.1 ppm - FILL: Silty CLAY; low plasticity, pale brown, with trace fine
1 grained sands, no odour.
BH120W_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 3.2 ppm
BH120W_1.5-1.6 ES
PID = 1.8 ppm
2 Cuttings
BH120W_2.0-2.1 ES
PID = 1.5 ppm
BH120W_2.4-2.5 ES
PID = 1.8 ppm 50 mm uPVC
2.70 Casing
CI Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, red/orange, mottled grey, no
odour.
3 BH120W_2.9-3.0 ES
PID = 1.1 ppm
3.30
From 3.3m, red, with pale grey banding.
4
BH120W_4.0-4.1 ES
GWNE
PID = 1.2 ppm

AD/T
- - Bentonite
4.50
From 4.5m, red mottled grey.
5.00
5
- SHALE; grey, inferred extremely weathered, no odour.
Sand
50 mm uPVC
Screen
7.00
7
From 7.0m, grey to pale brown.
Collapse
8.50
9
10
BOREHOLE: BH121
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, brown, trace fine gravels FILL
BH121_0.1-0.2 ES and rootlets, no odour.
PID = 3.7 ppm
0.10 m M
BH121_0.5-0.6 ES
0.80 QD2 QT2
PID = 3.1 ppm CI- RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red to red, no
GWNE
CH
AD/T
- 1 odour. -
BH121_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 2.8 ppm
1.40
From 1.4m, red to pale grey. D
BH121_2.0-2.1 ES
2 2.10 PID = 3.3 ppm
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH122
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty Gravelly SAND; fine grained, brown, with fine, FILL
BH122_0.1-0.2 ES sub-angular to angular gravels, no odour.
PID = 0.7 ppm M
0.50
BH122_0.5-0.6 ES - FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, brown, with fine,
0.70
PID = 1.1 ppm sub-angular to angular gravels, no odour.
From 0.7m, medium to high plasicity, red/brown.
1
BH122_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 0.9 ppm
1.30
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red mottled grey, RESIDUAL SOIL
GWNE
AD/T
- CH no odour. -
BH122_1.5-1.6 ES
PID = 3.3 ppm
D
BH122_2.4-2.5 ES
PID = 1.7 ppm
3.00
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH123
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty SAND; fine grained, brown to dark brown, trace FILL
BH123_0.1-0.2 ES fine, sub-angular gravels and rootlets, no odour.
PID = 1.4 ppm
0.40
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red/brown, no
BH123_0.5-0.6 ES odour. M
PID = 2.3 ppm
1
1.20
GWNE
AD/T
- CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, red/grey, no odour. - RESIDUAL SOIL
CH
BH123_1.4-1.5 ES
PID = 1.7 ppm
D
2
BH123_2.4-2.5 ES
2.50 PID = 2.4 ppm
3
10
BOREHOLE: BH124
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown to brown FILL
BH124_0.1-0.2 ES mottled pale grey, trace fine gravels and rootlets, no odour.
PID = 2.9 ppm
BH124_0.5-0.6 ES
PID = 3.5 ppm
1
BH124_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 2.7 ppm
1.30
From 1.3m, pale red mottled orange.
BH124_1.5-1.6 ES
GWNE
PID = 3.8 ppm

AD/T
- D -
2
BH124_2.0-2.1 ES
2.20 PID = 3.2 ppm
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale red to red, no RESIDUAL SOIL
CH odour.
BH124_2.3-2.4 ES
PID = 2.1 ppm
2.80
From 2.8m, red to pale grey.
3
BH124_3.3-3.4 ES
3.50 PID = 2.7 ppm
10
BOREHOLE: BH125
CONSISTENCY
USCS SYMBOL
PENETRATION
RECOVERED
RESISTANCE
CONDITION
STRUCTURE AND
MOISTURE
SAMPLE OR
GRAPHIC
METHOD
DENSITY
(metres)
WATER
FIELD TEST
DEPTH
OBSERVATIONS
LOG
DEPTH
RL
0
- FILL: Silty CLAY; medium plasticity, pale brown to brown FILL
BH125_0.1-0.2 ES mottled pale grey, trace fine gravels and rootlets, no odour.
PID = 4.9 ppm
BH125_0.5-0.6 ES
PID = 3.3 ppm
1
BH125_1.0-1.1 ES
PID = 3.2 ppm
GWNE
AD/T
- BH125_1.5-1.6 ES M -
PID = 4.1 ppm
1.80
CI- Silty CLAY; medium to high plasticity, pale brown, no odour.
2 CH
BH125_2.0-2.1 ES
PID = 2.9 ppm
BH125_2.9-3.0 ES
3 3.10 PID = 3.8 ppm
10
APPENDIX C
Field Data Sheets
APPENDIX D
Chain of Custody and Sample Receipt Forms
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE SE161954
CLIENT DETAILS LABORATORY DETAILS
Contact Joel Heininger Manager Huong Crawford

Client EI AUSTRALIA Laboratory SGS Alexandria Environmental
Address SUITE 6.01 Address Unit 16, 33 Maddox St
55 MILLER STREET Alexandria NSW 2015
PYRMONT NSW 2009
Telephone 61 2 95160722 Telephone +61 2 8594 0400

Facsimile (Not specified) Facsimile +61 2 8594 0499
Email joel.heininger@eiaustralia.com.au Email au.environmental.sydney@sgs.com
Project E23061 - 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde NSW Samples Received Mon 13/2/2017
Order Number E23061 Report Due Mon 20/2/2017
Samples 53 SGS Reference SE161954
SUBMISSION DETAILS
This is to confirm that 53 samples were received on Monday 13/2/2017. Results are expected to be ready by Monday 20/2/2017. Please quote
SGS reference SE161954 when making enquiries. Refer below for details relating to sample integrity upon receipt.
Samples clearly labelled Yes Complete documentation received Yes

Sample container provider SGS Sample cooling method Ice Bricks
Samples received in correct containers Yes Sample counts by matrix 48 Soil, 5 Water
Date documentation received 13/2/2017 Type of documentation received COC
Samples received in good order Yes Samples received without headspace Yes
Sample temperature upon receipt 7.2°C Sufficient sample for analysis Yes
Turnaround time requested Standard
Unless otherwise instructed, water and bulk samples will be held for one month from date of report, and soil samples will be held for two months.
COMMENTS
75 soil samples have been placed on hold.

Two samples received labelled as BH102_2.5-2.6 (Jar + Bag).
To the extent not inconsistent with the other provisions of this document and unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing by SGS, all SGS services are rendered in
accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sgs.com/en/terms-and-conditions as at the date of this document. Attention
is drawn to the limitations of liability and to the clauses of indemnification.
SGS Australia Pty Ltd Environment, Health and Safety Unit 16 33 Maddox St Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia t +61 2 8594 0400 www.sgs.com.au
ABN 44 000 964 278 PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia f +61 2 8594 0499
Member of the SGS Group

CLIENT DETAILS
Client EI AUSTRALIA Project E23061 - 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde NSW
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic
Total Recoverable Metals
TRH (Total Recoverable

Hydrocarbons) in Soil
OC Pesticides in Soil
OP Pesticides in Soil
Hydrocarbons in Soil
Volatile Petroleum
VOC’s in Soil
in Soil/Waste
PCBs in Soil
No. Sample ID
001 BH101 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
002 BH101 1.5-1.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
003 BH102 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
004 BH102 1.0-1.1 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
005 BH102 3.5-3.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
006 BH103 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
007 BH104 0.2-0.3 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
008 BH105W 0.2-0.3 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
009 BH106 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
010 BH106 0.5-0.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
011 BH107 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
012 BH108 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
013 BH108 0.5-0.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
014 BH109 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
015 BH109 0.5-0.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
016 BH110 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
017 BH110 0.5-0.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
018 BH111 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
019 BH111 1.0-1.1 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
020 BH112 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
021 BH112 0.5-0.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
022 BH113 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
023 BH114 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
024 BH115 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
The above table represents SGS' interpretation of the client-supplied Chain Of Custody document.
The numbers shown in the table indicate the number of results requested in each package.
Please indicate as soon as possible should your request differ from these details .
Testing as per this table shall commence immediately unless the client intervenes with a correction .
15/02/2017 Page 2 of 8
CLIENT DETAILS
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Total Recoverable Metals

OC Pesticides in Soil
OP Pesticides in Soil
Hydrocarbons in Soil
Volatile Petroleum
VOC’s in Soil
in Soil/Waste
PCBs in Soil
No. Sample ID
025 BH115 0.5-0.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
026 BH116 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
027 BH117W 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
028 BH117W 1.0-1.1 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
029 BH117W 2.5-2.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
030 BH118 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
031 BH118 2.0-2.1 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
032 BH119 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
033 BH120W 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
034 BH120W 0.5-0.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
035 BH120W 1.5-1.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
036 BH121 0.5-0.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
037 BH122 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
038 BH122 1.0-1.1 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
039 BH123 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
040 BH124 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
041 BH124 1.5-1.6 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
042 BH124 3.3-3.4 - - 26 - 7 10 12 8
043 BH125 0.1-0.2 28 13 26 11 7 10 12 8
044 QD1 - - - - 7 10 12 8
045 QD2 - - - - 7 10 12 8
048 QTB3 - - - - - - 12 -
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
15/02/2017 Page 3 of 8
CLIENT DETAILS
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
VOC’s in Soil
No. Sample ID
050 QTS3 12
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
15/02/2017 Page 4 of 8
CLIENT DETAILS
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Fibre Identification in soil
Moisture Content
Mercury in Soil
No. Sample ID
001 BH101 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
002 BH101 1.5-1.6 - 1 1
003 BH102 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
004 BH102 1.0-1.1 - 1 1
005 BH102 3.5-3.6 - 1 1
006 BH103 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
007 BH104 0.2-0.3 2 1 1
008 BH105W 0.2-0.3 2 1 1
009 BH106 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
010 BH106 0.5-0.6 - 1 1
011 BH107 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
012 BH108 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
013 BH108 0.5-0.6 - 1 1
014 BH109 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
015 BH109 0.5-0.6 - 1 1
016 BH110 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
017 BH110 0.5-0.6 - 1 1
018 BH111 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
019 BH111 1.0-1.1 - 1 1
020 BH112 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
021 BH112 0.5-0.6 - 1 1
022 BH113 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
023 BH114 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
024 BH115 0.1-0.2 2 1 1
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
15/02/2017 Page 5 of 8
CLIENT DETAILS
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Fibre Identification in soil
Moisture Content
VOCs in Water
Mercury in Soil
No. Sample ID
025 BH115 0.5-0.6 - 1 1 -
026 BH116 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
027 BH117W 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
028 BH117W 1.0-1.1 - 1 1 -
029 BH117W 2.5-2.6 - 1 1 -
030 BH118 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
031 BH118 2.0-2.1 - 1 1 -
032 BH119 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
033 BH120W 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
034 BH120W 0.5-0.6 - 1 1 -
035 BH120W 1.5-1.6 - 1 1 -
036 BH121 0.5-0.6 - 1 1 -
037 BH122 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
038 BH122 1.0-1.1 - 1 1 -
039 BH123 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
040 BH124 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
041 BH124 1.5-1.6 - 1 1 -
042 BH124 3.3-3.4 - 1 1 -
043 BH125 0.1-0.2 2 1 1 -
044 QD1 - 1 1 -
045 QD2 - 1 1 -
046 QTB1 - - - 12
047 QTB2 - - - 12
048 QTB3 - - 1 -
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
15/02/2017 Page 6 of 8
CLIENT DETAILS
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
VOCs in Water
No. Sample ID
049 QTS2 12
051 QR1 12
052 QR2 12
053 QR3 12
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
15/02/2017 Page 7 of 8
CLIENT DETAILS
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Trace Metals (Dissolved)

Hydrocarbons) in Water
Hydrocarbons in Water
Mercury (dissolved) in
in Water by ICPMS
Volatile Petroleum
Water
No. Sample ID
051 QR1 1 7 9 8
052 QR2 1 7 9 8
053 QR3 1 7 9 8
15/02/2017 Page 8 of 8
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE
Client Details
Client EI Australia
Attention Joel Heninger
Sample Login Details

Your Reference E23061, 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde
Envirolab Reference 161762
Date Sample Received 13/02/2017
Date Instructions Received 13/02/2017
Date Results Expected to be Reported 20/02/2017
Sample Condition
Samples received in appropriate condition for analysis YES
No. of Samples Provided 3 Soils
Turnaround Time Requested Standard
Temperature on receipt (°C) 20.0
Cooling Method Ice Pack
Sampling Date Provided YES
Comments
Samples will be held for 1 month for water samples and 2 months for soil samples from date of
receipt of samples
Please direct any queries to:
Aileen Hie Jacinta Hurst

Phone: 02 9910 6200 Phone: 02 9910 6200
Fax: 02 9910 6201 Fax: 02 9910 6201
Email: ahie@envirolabservices.com.au Email: jhurst@envirolabservices.com.au
Sample and Testing Details on following page

svTRH (C10-C40) in
C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Acid Extractable
metals in soil
vTRH(C6-
On Hold
Sample Id
Soil
QT1 ✓ ✓ ✓
QT2 ✓ ✓ ✓
QT3 ✓
The ’✓’ indicates the testing you have requested. THIS IS NOT A REPORT OF THE RESULTS.

PYRMONT NSW 2009

Project E23061 - 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde NSW Samples Received Tue 21/2/2017
Order Number E23061 Report Due Tue 28/2/2017
Samples 7 SGS Reference SE162232
SUBMISSION DETAILS
This is to confirm that 7 samples were received on Tuesday 21/2/2017. Results are expected to be ready by Tuesday 28/2/2017. Please quote
SGS reference SE162232 when making enquiries. Refer below for details relating to sample integrity upon receipt.

Samples received in correct containers Yes Sample counts by matrix 7 Water
Unless otherwise instructed, water and bulk samples will be held for one month from date of report, and soil samples will be held for two months.
COMMENTS
To the extent not inconsistent with the other provisions of this document and unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing by SGS, all SGS services are rendered in
accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sgs.com/en/terms-and-conditions as at the date of this document. Attention
is drawn to the limitations of liability and to the clauses of indemnification.

CLIENT DETAILS
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Trace Metals (Dissolved)

Total Phenolics in Water

Hydrocarbons in Water
Mercury (dissolved) in
in Water by ICPMS
Volatile Petroleum
VOCs in Water
Water
No. Sample ID
001 BH105W 1 22 1 7 9 79 8
002 BH117W 1 22 1 7 9 79 8
003 BH120W 1 22 1 7 9 79 8
004 GWQD1 1 - - 7 9 12 8
005 GWQR1 1 - - 7 9 12 8
006 GWTS1 - - - - - 12 -
007 GWTB1 - - - - - 12 -
21/02/2017 Page 2 of 2
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE
Client Details
Client EI Australia
Attention Joel Heininger
Sample Login Details

Your Reference E23061, 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde
Envirolab Reference 162326
Date Sample Received 22/02/2017
Date Instructions Received 22/02/2017
Date Results Expected to be Reported 01/03/2017
Sample Condition
Samples received in appropriate condition for analysis YES
No. of Samples Provided 1 Water
Turnaround Time Requested Standard
Temperature on receipt (°C) 8.8
Cooling Method Ice Pack
Sampling Date Provided YES
Comments
Samples will be held for 1 month for water samples and 2 months for soil samples from date of
receipt of samples
Please direct any queries to:
Aileen Hie Jacinta Hurst

Phone: 02 9910 6200 Phone: 02 9910 6200
Fax: 02 9910 6201 Fax: 02 9910 6201
Email: ahie@envirolabservices.com.au Email: jhurst@envirolabservices.com.au
Sample and Testing Details on following page

svTRH (C10-C40) in
Metals in Water -
C10)/BTEXN in
Dissolved
vTRH(C6-
Water
Water
Sample Id
GWQT1 ✓ ✓ ✓
The ’✓’ indicates the testing you have requested. THIS IS NOT A REPORT OF THE RESULTS.
APPENDIX E
Laboratory Analytical Reports
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Accreditation No. 2562

PYRMONT NSW 2009

Project E23061 - 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde NSW SGS Reference SE161954 R0
Order Number E23061 Date Received 13/2/2017
Samples 53 Date Reported 20/2/2017
COMMENTS
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. NATA accredited laboratory 2562(4354).
No respirable fibres detected in all soil samples using trace analysis technique.
Sample #20: Asbestos found in 5x3mm cement sheet fragments.
Asbestos analysed by Approved Identifiers Ravee Sivasubramaniam and Yusuf Kuthpudin .
SIGNATORIES
Bennet Lo Huong Crawford Kamrul Ahsan

Senior Organic Chemist/Metals Chemist Production Manager Senior Chemist
Ly Kim Ha Ravee Sivasubramaniam

Organic Section Head Hygiene Team Leader

20/02/2017 Page 1 of 38
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SE161954 R0
VOC’s in Soil [AN433] Tested: 14/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH101 1.5-1.6 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH102 1.0-1.1 BH102 3.5-3.6
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
PARAMETER UOM LOR SE161954.001 SE161954.002 SE161954.003 SE161954.004 SE161954.005
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3 BH106 0.1-0.2 BH106 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.5-0.6 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
BH110 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.5-0.6 BH111 0.1-0.2 BH111 1.0-1.1 BH112 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
20/02/2017 Page 2 of 38
VOC’s in Soil [AN433] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH112 0.5-0.6 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH117W 1.0-1.1 BH117W 2.5-2.6 BH118 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
BH118 2.0-2.1 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.5-0.6 BH120W 1.5-1.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
BH121 0.5-0.6 BH122 0.1-0.2 BH122 1.0-1.1 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
20/02/2017 Page 3 of 38
VOC’s in Soil [AN433] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH124 1.5-1.6 BH124 3.3-3.4 BH125 0.1-0.2 QD1 QD2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017 9/2/2017
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
QTB3 QTS3
SOIL SOIL
- -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017
PARAMETER UOM LOR SE161954.048 SE161954.050
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 [95%]
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 [93%]
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 [95%]
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 [97%]
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 [95%]
Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 -
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 -
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 -
20/02/2017 Page 4 of 38
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil [AN433] Tested: 14/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH101 1.5-1.6 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH102 1.0-1.1 BH102 3.5-3.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3 BH106 0.1-0.2 BH106 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.5-0.6 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
BH110 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.5-0.6 BH111 0.1-0.2 BH111 1.0-1.1 BH112 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
BH112 0.5-0.6 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH117W 1.0-1.1 BH117W 2.5-2.6 BH118 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
20/02/2017 Page 5 of 38
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil [AN433] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH118 2.0-2.1 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.5-0.6 BH120W 1.5-1.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
BH121 0.5-0.6 BH122 0.1-0.2 BH122 1.0-1.1 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
BH124 1.5-1.6 BH124 3.3-3.4 BH125 0.1-0.2 QD1 QD2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017 9/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
20/02/2017 Page 6 of 38
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN403] Tested: 14/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH101 1.5-1.6 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH102 1.0-1.1 BH102 3.5-3.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3 BH106 0.1-0.2 BH106 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 28 <20 <20 20 32
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 220 <45 <45 82 51
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 110 <45 <45 61 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 100 <25 <25 32 43

TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 100 <25 <25 32 43
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 220 <90 <90 120 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 350 <110 <110 160 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 320 <210 <210 <210 <210
BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.5-0.6 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 93 45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 98 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 140 <90 <90 <90 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 190 <110 <110 <110 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
20/02/2017 Page 7 of 38
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN403] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH110 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.5-0.6 BH111 0.1-0.2 BH111 1.0-1.1 BH112 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 58 <45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 65 <45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 100 <90 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 120 <110 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
BH112 0.5-0.6 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH117W 1.0-1.1 BH117W 2.5-2.6 BH118 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 26 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 56 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 32 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 32 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
20/02/2017 Page 8 of 38
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN403] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH118 2.0-2.1 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.5-0.6 BH120W 1.5-1.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 150 70 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 130 47 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 49 <25 <25
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 <25 <25 49 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 210 95 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 280 120 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 260 <210 <210
BH121 0.5-0.6 BH122 0.1-0.2 BH122 1.0-1.1 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 49 <45 <45 70

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 <45 <45 65
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 130

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 140
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
BH124 1.5-1.6 BH124 3.3-3.4 BH125 0.1-0.2 QD1 QD2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017 9/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
20/02/2017 Page 9 of 38
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN420] Tested: 14/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH101 1.5-1.6 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH102 1.0-1.1 BH102 3.5-3.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3 BH106 0.1-0.2 BH106 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6 0.1

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.7 0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.5 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.5 0.1

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.5 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.6 <0.2
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.7 <0.3
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.7 <0.2
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 4.3 <0.8
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 4.3 <0.8
20/02/2017 Page 10 of 38
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN420] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.5-0.6 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 <0.2 0.3 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 0.4 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 0.3 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 1.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 1.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
BH110 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.5-0.6 BH111 0.1-0.2 BH111 1.0-1.1 BH112 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6 <0.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.7 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 <0.1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.5 <0.2
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.6 <0.3
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.6 <0.2
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 4.1 <0.8
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 4.1 <0.8
20/02/2017 Page 11 of 38
BH112 0.5-0.6 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 1.0 <0.8
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH117W 1.0-1.1 BH117W 2.5-2.6 BH118 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 0.2

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 0.9 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 0.9 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
20/02/2017 Page 12 of 38
BH118 2.0-2.1 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.5-0.6 BH120W 1.5-1.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.2

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.3
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.3
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.4
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.3
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2

Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.3 0.4
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.4 0.5
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.3 0.5
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 2.1 3.2
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 2.1 3.2
BH121 0.5-0.6 BH122 0.1-0.2 BH122 1.0-1.1 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 1.4 0.2 <0.1 0.6

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 1.1 2.4 0.8 <0.1 0.6

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 1.0 1.9 0.9 <0.1 0.7
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 1.2 1.0 0.6 <0.1 0.4
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 1.1 0.9 0.5 <0.1 0.3
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.7 1.1 0.5 <0.1 0.5
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.4 <0.1 0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.5 <0.1 0.3
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.3 <0.1 0.2
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.2 <0.1 0.2

Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 0.8 1.3 0.6 <0.2 0.4
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 0.9 1.4 0.7 <0.3 0.5
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 0.9 1.4 0.7 <0.2 0.5
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 7.0 12 4.7 <0.8 3.9
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 7.0 12 4.7 <0.8 3.9
20/02/2017 Page 13 of 38
BH124 1.5-1.6 BH124 3.3-3.4 BH125 0.1-0.2
SOIL SOIL SOIL

- - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
PARAMETER UOM LOR SE161954.041 SE161954.042 SE161954.043
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.4

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.5
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.4
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2

Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.4
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.5
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.4
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 3.0
Total PAH (NEPM/WHO 16) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 3.0
20/02/2017 Page 14 of 38
OC Pesticides in Soil [AN420] Tested: 14/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
20/02/2017 Page 15 of 38
OC Pesticides in Soil [AN420] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH106 0.1-0.2 BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
20/02/2017 Page 16 of 38
BH111 0.1-0.2 BH112 0.1-0.2 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
20/02/2017 Page 17 of 38
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH118 0.1-0.2 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
20/02/2017 Page 18 of 38
BH122 0.1-0.2 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2 BH125 0.1-0.2
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

- - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
PARAMETER UOM LOR SE161954.037 SE161954.039 SE161954.040 SE161954.043
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
20/02/2017 Page 19 of 38
OP Pesticides in Soil [AN420] Tested: 14/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
BH106 0.1-0.2 BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017
Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
BH111 0.1-0.2 BH112 0.1-0.2 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017
Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
20/02/2017 Page 20 of 38
OP Pesticides in Soil [AN420] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH118 0.1-0.2 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017
Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
BH122 0.1-0.2 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2 BH125 0.1-0.2
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

- - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
20/02/2017 Page 21 of 38
PCBs in Soil [AN420] Tested: 14/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
BH106 0.1-0.2 BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017
Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
BH111 0.1-0.2 BH112 0.1-0.2 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017
Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
20/02/2017 Page 22 of 38
PCBs in Soil [AN420] Tested: 14/2/2017 (continued)
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH118 0.1-0.2 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017
Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
BH122 0.1-0.2 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2 BH125 0.1-0.2
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

- - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1
20/02/2017 Page 23 of 38
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil/Waste Solids/Materials by ICPOES [AN040/AN320] Tested: 16/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH101 1.5-1.6 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH102 1.0-1.1 BH102 3.5-3.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 8 5 <3 10 4
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 14 7.0 29 19 13

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 26 30 35 33 6.5
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 21 17 7 15 8
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 13 2.3 83 63 9.3
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 22 17 41 31 8.3
BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3 BH106 0.1-0.2 BH106 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 6 3 <3 8 7
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.8 0.4
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 12 7.6 8.1 25 26
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 16 12 10 85 35
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 22 17 18 260 65
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 3.2 1.0 0.6 7.9 3.7
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 33 11 12 240 57
BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.5-0.6 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 9 8 10 5 5
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 <0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 14 26 35 71 23

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 18 70 16 22 11
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 23 61 25 14 23
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 3.2 4.5 2.5 57 11
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 30 78 15 40 9.3
BH110 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.5-0.6 BH111 0.1-0.2 BH111 1.0-1.1 BH112 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.3 0.6 <0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 72 66 9.5 34 7.7

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 26 19 29 30 13
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 14 17 22 35 18
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 54 40 6.4 6.6 5.6
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 47 32 51 34 41
20/02/2017 Page 24 of 38
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil/Waste Solids/Materials by ICPOES [AN040/AN320] Tested: 16/2/2017 (continued)
BH112 0.5-0.6 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3 <0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 18 12 18 74 27

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 10 35 63 26 19
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 21 16 65 13 19
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 3.4 53 5.3 64 18
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 23 75 94 49 21
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH117W 1.0-1.1 BH117W 2.5-2.6 BH118 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.4 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 29 12 20 32 13

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 15 32 11 11 16
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 29 23 25 24 14
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 4.6 26 3.7 5.1 21
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 22 35 19 18 27
BH118 2.0-2.1 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.5-0.6 BH120W 1.5-1.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.5 0.6
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 22 4.9 13 29 35
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 14 5.8 20 20 16
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 25 8 160 63 52
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 3.0 3.9 6.2 5.0 5.3
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 17 25 44 54 36
BH121 0.5-0.6 BH122 0.1-0.2 BH122 1.0-1.1 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.4 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.4
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 27 54 39 9.9 25
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 21 15 12 38 21
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 45 34 22 22 43
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 4.7 9.1 8.2 37 5.1
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 33 49 20 72 43
20/02/2017 Page 25 of 38
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil/Waste Solids/Materials by ICPOES [AN040/AN320] Tested: 16/2/2017 (continued)
BH124 1.5-1.6 BH124 3.3-3.4 BH125 0.1-0.2 QD1 QD2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017 9/2/2017
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 32 17 28 24 27
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 13 27 19 18 19
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 31 19 59 61 40
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 5.2 1.1 5.9 5.4 5.0
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 17 7.2 52 57 28
20/02/2017 Page 26 of 38
Mercury in Soil [AN312] Tested: 16/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH101 1.5-1.6 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH102 1.0-1.1 BH102 3.5-3.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3 BH106 0.1-0.2 BH106 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13 <0.05
BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.5-0.6 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
BH110 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.5-0.6 BH111 0.1-0.2 BH111 1.0-1.1 BH112 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
BH112 0.5-0.6 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH117W 1.0-1.1 BH117W 2.5-2.6 BH118 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
BH118 2.0-2.1 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.5-0.6 BH120W 1.5-1.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
20/02/2017 Page 27 of 38
Mercury in Soil [AN312] Tested: 16/2/2017 (continued)
BH121 0.5-0.6 BH122 0.1-0.2 BH122 1.0-1.1 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06
BH124 1.5-1.6 BH124 3.3-3.4 BH125 0.1-0.2 QD1 QD2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017 9/2/2017
Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.10
20/02/2017 Page 28 of 38
Moisture Content [AN002] Tested: 15/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH101 1.5-1.6 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH102 1.0-1.1 BH102 3.5-3.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 9.0 10 2.3 8.3 5.2
BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3 BH106 0.1-0.2 BH106 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 13 7.1 7.3 18 21
BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.5-0.6 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 18 18 27 14 15
BH110 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.5-0.6 BH111 0.1-0.2 BH111 1.0-1.1 BH112 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 11 14 13 24 11
BH112 0.5-0.6 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.5-0.6

- - - - -
8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 19 21 14 9.3 14
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH117W 1.0-1.1 BH117W 2.5-2.6 BH118 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 18 13 12 21 12
BH118 2.0-2.1 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.5-0.6 BH120W 1.5-1.6

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017 8/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 15 7.1 13 16 15
20/02/2017 Page 29 of 38
Moisture Content [AN002] Tested: 15/2/2017 (continued)
BH121 0.5-0.6 BH122 0.1-0.2 BH122 1.0-1.1 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 16 12 18 20 15
BH124 1.5-1.6 BH124 3.3-3.4 BH125 0.1-0.2 QD1 QD2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017 9/2/2017
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 16 18 14 16 17
QTB3
SOIL
-
10/2/2017
PARAMETER UOM LOR SE161954.048
% Moisture %w/w 0.5 <0.5
20/02/2017 Page 30 of 38
Fibre Identification in soil [AN602] Tested: 17/2/2017
BH101 0.1-0.2 BH102 0.1-0.2 BH103 0.1-0.2 BH104 0.2-0.3 BH105W 0.2-0.3

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Asbestos Detected No unit - No No No No No
Estimated Fibres* %w/w 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
BH106 0.1-0.2 BH107 0.1-0.2 BH108 0.1-0.2 BH109 0.1-0.2 BH110 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017
BH111 0.1-0.2 BH112 0.1-0.2 BH113 0.1-0.2 BH114 0.1-0.2 BH115 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 9/2/2017
Asbestos Detected No unit - No Yes No No No
Estimated Fibres* %w/w 0.01 <0.01 >0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
BH116 0.1-0.2 BH117W 0.1-0.2 BH118 0.1-0.2 BH119 0.1-0.2 BH120W 0.1-0.2

- - - - -
9/2/2017 8/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 8/2/2017
BH122 0.1-0.2 BH123 0.1-0.2 BH124 0.1-0.2 BH125 0.1-0.2
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

- - - -
9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017
Asbestos Detected No unit - No No No No
Estimated Fibres* %w/w 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
20/02/2017 Page 31 of 38
VOCs in Water [AN433] Tested: 15/2/2017
QTB1 QTB2 QTS2 QR1 QR2
WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER

- - - - -
8/2/2017 9/2/2017 9/2/2017 8/2/2017 9/2/2017
Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 [96%] <0.5 <0.5
Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 [96%] <0.5 <0.5
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 [99%] <0.5 <0.5
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1 <1 [97%] <1 <1
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 [101%] <0.5 <0.5
Total Xylenes µg/L 1.5 <1.5 <1.5 - <1.5 <1.5
Total BTEX µg/L 3 <3 <3 - <3 <3
Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5
QR3
WATER
-
10/2/2017
PARAMETER UOM LOR SE161954.053
Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Total Xylenes µg/L 1.5 <1.5
Total BTEX µg/L 3 <3
Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
20/02/2017 Page 32 of 38
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water [AN433] Tested: 15/2/2017
QR1 QR2 QR3
WATER WATER WATER

- - -
8/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40 <40 <40
Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50
20/02/2017 Page 33 of 38
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN403] Tested: 16/2/2017
QR1 QR2 QR3
WATER WATER WATER

- - -
8/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 <60 <60 <60
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 <500 <500 <500
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 <500 <500 <500
TRH C10-C36 µg/L 450 <450 <450 <450
TRH C10-C40 µg/L 650 <650 <650 <650
20/02/2017 Page 34 of 38
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS [AN318] Tested: 15/2/2017
QR1 QR2 QR3
WATER WATER WATER

- - -
8/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017
Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 100 <5 <5
20/02/2017 Page 35 of 38
Mercury (dissolved) in Water [AN311(Perth)/AN312] Tested: 16/2/2017
QR1 QR2 QR3
WATER WATER WATER

- - -
8/2/2017 9/2/2017 10/2/2017
Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
20/02/2017 Page 36 of 38
METHOD SUMMARY SE161954 R0
METHOD METHODOLOGY SUMMARY
AN002 The test is carried out by drying (at either 40°C or 105°C) a known mass of sample in a weighed evaporating
basin. After fully dry the sample is re-weighed. Samples such as sludge and sediment having high percentages of
moisture will take some time in a drying oven for complete removal of water.
AN020 Unpreserved water sample is filtered through a 0.45µm membrane filter and acidified with nitric acid similar to
APHA3030B.
AN040/AN320 A portion of sample is digested with nitric acid to decompose organic matter and hydrochloric acid to complete the
digestion of metals. The digest is then analysed by ICP OES with metals results reported on the dried sample
basis. Based on USEPA method 200.8 and 6010C.
AN040 A portion of sample is digested with Nitric acid to decompose organic matter and Hydrochloric acid to complete the
digestion of metals and then filtered for analysis by ASS or ICP as per USEPA Method 200.8.
AN311(Perth)/AN312 Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Waters: Mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution
to elemental mercury. This mercury vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption
spectrometer or mercury analyser. Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration
standards. Reference APHA 3112/3500.
AN312 Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Soils: After digestion with nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide and hydrochloric acid ,
mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution to elemental mercury. This mercury
vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption spectrometer or mercury analyser .
Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration standards. Reference APHA
3112/3500
AN318 Determination of elements at trace level in waters by ICP-MS technique, in accordance with USEPA 6020A.
AN403 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons: Determination of Hydrocarbons by gas chromatography after a solvent
extraction. Detection is by flame ionisation detector (FID) that produces an electronic signal in proportion to the
combustible matter passing through it. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) are routinely reported as four
alkane groupings based on the carbon chain length of the compounds: C6-C9, C10-C14, C15-C28 and C29-C36
and in recognition of the NEPM 1999 (2013), >C10-C16 (F2), >C16-C34 (F3) and >C34-C40 (F4). F2 is reported
directly and also corrected by subtracting Naphthalene ( from VOC method AN433) where available.
AN403 Additionally, the volatile C6-C9 fraction may be determined by a purge and trap technique and GC /MS because of
the potential for volatiles loss. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) follows the same method of analysis after
silica gel cleanup of the solvent extract. Aliphatic/Aromatic Speciation follows the same method of analysis after
fractionation of the solvent extract over silica with differential polarity of the eluent solvents .
AN403 The GC/FID method is not well suited to the analysis of refined high boiling point materials (ie lubricating oils or
greases) but is particularly suited for measuring diesel, kerosene and petrol if care to control volatility is taken. This
method will detect naturally occurring hydrocarbons, lipids, animal fats, phenols and PAHs if they are present at
sufficient levels, dependent on the use of specific cleanup /fractionation techniques. Reference USEPA 3510B,
8015B.
AN420 (SVOCs) including OC, OP, PCB, Herbicides, PAH, Phthalates and Speciated Phenols (etc) in soils, sediments
and waters are determined by GCMS/ECD technique following appropriate solvent extraction process (Based on
USEPA 3500C and 8270D).
AN420 SVOC Compounds: Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) including OC, OP, PCB, Herbicides, PAH,
Phthalates and Speciated Phenols in soils, sediments and waters are determined by GCMS /ECD technique
following appropriate solvent extraction process ( Based on USEPA 3500C and 8270D).
AN433 VOCs and C6-C9 Hydrocarbons by GC-MS P&T: VOC`s are volatile organic compounds. The sample is presented
to a gas chromatograph via a purge and trap (P&T) concentrator and autosampler and is detected with a Mass
Spectrometer (MSD). Solid samples are initially extracted with methanol whilst liquid samples are processed
directly. References: USEPA 5030B, 8020A, 8260.
AN602 Qualitative identification of chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite in bulk samples by polarised light microscopy (PLM)
in conjunction with dispersion staining (DS). AS4964 provides the basis for this document. Unequivocal
identification of the asbestos minerals present is made by obtaining sufficient diagnostic `clues`, which provide a
reasonable degree of certainty, dispersion staining is a mandatory `clue` for positive identification. If sufficient
`clues` are absent, then positive identification of asbestos is not possible. This procedure requires removal of
suspect fibres/bundles from the sample which cannot be returned.
AN602 Fibres/material that cannot be unequivocably identified as one of the three asbestos forms, will be reported as
unknown mineral fibres (umf).
AN602 AS4964.2004 Method for the Qualitative Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Samples, Section 8.4, Trace Analysis
Criteria, Note 4 states:"Depending upon sample condition and fibre type, the detection limit of this technique has
been found to lie generally in the range of 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 parts by weight, equivalent to 1 to 0.1 g/kg."
20/02/2017 Page 37 of 38
AN602 The sample can be reported “no asbestos found at the reporting limit of 0.1 g/kg” (<0.01%w/w) where AN602
section 4.5 of this method has been followed, and if-
(a) no trace asbestos fibres have been detected (i.e. no ‘respirable’ fibres):
(b) the estimated weight of non-respirable asbestos fibre bundles and /or the estimated weight of asbestos in
asbestos-containing materials are found to be less than 0.1g/kg: and
(c) these non-respirable asbestos fibre bundles and /or the asbestos containing materials are only visible under
stereo-microscope viewing conditions.
FOOTNOTES
* NATA accreditation does not cover - Not analysed. UOM Unit of Measure.
the performance of this service. NVL Not validated. LOR Limit of Reporting.
** Indicative data, theoretical holding IS Insufficient sample for analysis. ↑↓ Raised/lowered Limit of
time exceeded. LNR Sample listed, but not received. Reporting.
Samples analysed as received.

Solid samples expressed on a dry weight basis.
Where "Total" analyte groups are reported (for example, Total PAHs, Total OC Pesticides) the total will be calculated as the sum of the individual
analytes, with those analytes that are reported as <LOR being assumed to be zero. The summed (Total) limit of reporting is calculated by summing
the individual analyte LORs and dividing by two. For example, where 16 individual analytes are being summed and each has an LOR of 0.1 mg/kg,
the "Totals" LOR will be 1.6 / 2 (0.8 mg/kg). Where only 2 analytes are being summed, the " Total" LOR will be the sum of those two LORs.
Some totals may not appear to add up because the total is rounded after adding up the raw values.
If reported, measurement uncertainty follow the ± sign after the analytical result and is expressed as the expanded uncertainty calculated using a
coverage factor of 2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%, unless stated otherwise in the comments section of this report.
Results reported for samples tested under test methods with codes starting with ARS -SOP, radionuclide or gross radioactivity concentrations are
expressed in becquerel (Bq) per unit of mass or volume or per wipe as stated on the report. Becquerel is the SI unit for activity and equals one
nuclear transformation per second.
Note that in terms of units of radioactivity:
a. 1 Bq is equivalent to 27 pCi
b. 37 MBq is equivalent to 1 mCi
For results reported for samples tested under test methods with codes starting with ARS -SOP, less than (<) values indicate the detection limit for
each radionuclide or parameter for the measurement system used. The respective detection limits have been calculated in accordance with ISO
11929.
The QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QAQC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here :
http://www.sgs.com.au/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/ Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service available on request and accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/terms-and-conditions. The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues
defined therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company 's findings at the time of its intervention only
and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to
a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
This report must not be reproduced, except in full.
20/02/2017 Page 38 of 38
STATEMENT OF QA/QC SE161954 R0
PERFORMANCE

PYRMONT NSW 2009

Order Number E23061 Date Received 13 Feb 2017
Samples 53 Date Reported 20 Feb 2017
COMMENTS
All the laboratory data for each environmental matrix was compared to SGS' stated Data Quality Objectives (DQO). Comments
arising from the comparison were made and are reported below.
The data relating to sampling was taken from the Chain of Custody document and was supplied by the Client.
This QA/QC Statement must be read in conjunction with the referenced Analytical Report.
The Statement and the Analytical Report must not be reproduced except in full.
All Data Quality Objectives were met with the exception of the following:
Extraction Date TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water 1 item
Duplicate Total Recoverable Metals in Soil/Waste Solids/Materials by ICPOES 1 item
Matrix Spike Mercury in Soil 1 item
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS 1 item
SAMPLE SUMMARY

Samples received in correct containers Yes Sample counts by matrix 48 Soil, 5 Water

20/2/2017 Page 1 of 52
HOLDING TIME SUMMARY SE161954 R0
SGS holding time criteria are drawn from current regulations and are highly dependent on sample container preservation as specified in the SGS “Field Sampling Guide for
Containers and Holding Time” (ref: GU-(AU)-ENV.001). Soil samples guidelines are derived from NEPM "Schedule B(3) Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially
Contaminated Soils". Water sample guidelines are derived from "AS/NZS 5667.1 : 1998 Water Quality - sampling part 1" and APHA "Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater" 21st edition 2005.
Extraction and analysis holding time due dates listed are calculated from the date sampled, although holding times may be extended after laboratory extraction for some
analytes. The due dates are the suggested dates that samples may be held before extraction or analysis and still be considered valid.
Extraction and analysis dates are shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria. If the sampled
date is not supplied then compliance with criteria cannot be determined. If the received date is after one or both due dates then holding time will fail by default.
Fibre Identification in soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN602

Sample Name Sample No. QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 LB118914 10 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 10 Feb 2018 17 Feb 2017 10 Feb 2018 20 Feb 2017
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 LB118914 09 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 09 Feb 2018 17 Feb 2017 09 Feb 2018 20 Feb 2017
Mercury (dissolved) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311(Perth)/AN312

QR1 SE161954.051 LB118785 08 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 08 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017 08 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017
Mercury in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312

BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 LB118796 10 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 10 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017 10 Mar 2017 17 Feb 2017
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 LB118796 09 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 09 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017 09 Mar 2017 17 Feb 2017
20/2/2017 Page 2 of 52
Mercury in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312

QD1 SE161954.044 LB118798 08 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 08 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017 08 Mar 2017 17 Feb 2017
QD2 SE161954.045 LB118798 09 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 09 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017 09 Mar 2017 17 Feb 2017
Moisture Content Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN002

20/2/2017 Page 3 of 52
Moisture Content (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN002

QD1 SE161954.044 LB118707 08 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 22 Feb 2017 15 Feb 2017 20 Feb 2017 16 Feb 2017
QD2 SE161954.045 LB118707 09 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 23 Feb 2017 15 Feb 2017 20 Feb 2017 16 Feb 2017
QTB3 SE161954.048 LB118707 10 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 24 Feb 2017 15 Feb 2017 20 Feb 2017 16 Feb 2017
OC Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 LB118680 10 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 24 Feb 2017 14 Feb 2017 26 Mar 2017 17 Feb 2017
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 LB118680 09 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 23 Feb 2017 14 Feb 2017 26 Mar 2017 17 Feb 2017
QD1 SE161954.044 LB118682 08 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 22 Feb 2017 14 Feb 2017 26 Mar 2017 17 Feb 2017
OP Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

20/2/2017 Page 4 of 52
OP Pesticides in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

20/2/2017 Page 5 of 52
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

PCBs in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

20/2/2017 Page 6 of 52
PCBs in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

Total Recoverable Metals in Soil/Waste Solids/Materials by ICPOES Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320

BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 LB118804 10 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 09 Aug 2017 16 Feb 2017 09 Aug 2017 17 Feb 2017
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 LB118804 09 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 08 Aug 2017 16 Feb 2017 08 Aug 2017 17 Feb 2017
20/2/2017 Page 7 of 52
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil/Waste Solids/Materials by ICPOES (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320

QD1 SE161954.044 LB118806 08 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 07 Aug 2017 16 Feb 2017 07 Aug 2017 17 Feb 2017
QD2 SE161954.045 LB118806 09 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 08 Aug 2017 16 Feb 2017 08 Aug 2017 17 Feb 2017
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318

QR1 SE161954.051 LB118743 08 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 07 Aug 2017 15 Feb 2017 07 Aug 2017 16 Feb 2017
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403

20/2/2017 Page 8 of 52
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403

QR1 SE161954.051 LB118777 08 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 15 Feb 2017 16 Feb 2017† 28 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017
QR2 SE161954.052 LB118777 09 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 16 Feb 2017 16 Feb 2017 28 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017
VOC’s in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433

QTB3 SE161954.048 LB118684 10 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 24 Feb 2017 14 Feb 2017 26 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017
QTS3 SE161954.050 LB118684 10 Feb 2017 13 Feb 2017 24 Feb 2017 14 Feb 2017 26 Mar 2017 16 Feb 2017
VOCs in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433

20/2/2017 Page 9 of 52
VOCs in Water (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433

Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433

Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433

20/2/2017 Page 10 of 52
20/2/2017 Page 11 of 52
SURROGATES SE161954 R0
Surrogate results are evaluated against upper and lower limit criteria established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). At least two of three routine level soil
sample surrogate spike recoveries for BTEX /VOC are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not been developed and within the established control limits for charted
surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as an acceptance criterion. Water sample surrogate spike recoveries are to be within 40-130%. The presence of emulsions,
surfactants and particulates may void this as an acceptance criterion.
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end
of this report for failure reasons.

Parameter Sample Name Sample Number Units Criteria Recovery %
Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 60 - 130% 79
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 75
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 78
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 76
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 75
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 85
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 77
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 80
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 82
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 98
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 83
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 87
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 83
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 84
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 85
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 79
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 83
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 83
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 80
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 72
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 95
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 87
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 86
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 82

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 60 - 130% 88
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 110
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 86
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 86
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 90
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 74
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 88
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 88
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 88
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 88
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 72
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 86
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 84
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 96
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 88
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 90
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 90
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 84
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 100
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 72
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 84
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 86
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 88
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 88
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 60 - 130% 104
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 108
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 102
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 106
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 100
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 86
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 102
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 96
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 100
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 102
20/2/2017 Page 12 of 52

BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 96
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 92
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 102
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 94
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 96
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 96
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 96
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 116
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 84
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 96
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 96
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 100
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 102

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 70 - 130% 88
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 70 - 130% 86
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 70 - 130% 110
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 70 - 130% 86
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 70 - 130% 86
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 70 - 130% 86
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 70 - 130% 86
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 70 - 130% 90
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 70 - 130% 74
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 70 - 130% 90
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 70 - 130% 88
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 70 - 130% 88
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 70 - 130% 84
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 70 - 130% 88
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 70 - 130% 102
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 70 - 130% 88
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 70 - 130% 106
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 70 - 130% 72
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 70 - 130% 88
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 70 - 130% 86
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 70 - 130% 84
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 70 - 130% 84
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 70 - 130% 96
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 70 - 130% 88
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 70 - 130% 86
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 70 - 130% 90
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 70 - 130% 90
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 70 - 130% 96
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 70 - 130% 90
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 70 - 130% 84
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 70 - 130% 90
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 70 - 130% 100
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 70 - 130% 72
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 70 - 130% 90
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 70 - 130% 88
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 70 - 130% 88
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 70 - 130% 84
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 70 - 130% 90
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 70 - 130% 86
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 70 - 130% 88
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 70 - 130% 94
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 70 - 130% 88
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 70 - 130% 88
20/2/2017 Page 13 of 52

BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 70 - 130% 108
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 70 - 130% 98
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 70 - 130% 100
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 70 - 130% 102
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 70 - 130% 106
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 70 - 130% 100
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 70 - 130% 86
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 70 - 130% 100
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 70 - 130% 102
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 70 - 130% 96
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 70 - 130% 94
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 70 - 130% 100
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 70 - 130% 106
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 70 - 130% 102
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 70 - 130% 118
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 70 - 130% 80
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 70 - 130% 106
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 70 - 130% 96
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 70 - 130% 96
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 70 - 130% 92
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 70 - 130% 102
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 70 - 130% 94
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 70 - 130% 98
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 70 - 130% 96
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 70 - 130% 96
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 70 - 130% 102
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 70 - 130% 106
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 70 - 130% 96
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 70 - 130% 100
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 70 - 130% 116
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 70 - 130% 84
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 70 - 130% 100
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 70 - 130% 100
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 70 - 130% 110
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 70 - 130% 96
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 70 - 130% 106
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 70 - 130% 96
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 70 - 130% 100
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 70 - 130% 110
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 70 - 130% 96
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 70 - 130% 102
d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 70 - 130% 88
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 70 - 130% 88
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 70 - 130% 116
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 70 - 130% 90
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 70 - 130% 88
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 70 - 130% 90
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 70 - 130% 96
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 70 - 130% 94
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 70 - 130% 76
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 70 - 130% 94
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 70 - 130% 94
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 70 - 130% 94
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 70 - 130% 94
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 70 - 130% 90
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 70 - 130% 108
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 70 - 130% 92
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 70 - 130% 110
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 70 - 130% 72
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 70 - 130% 96
20/2/2017 Page 14 of 52

d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 70 - 130% 94
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 70 - 130% 90
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 70 - 130% 86
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 70 - 130% 98
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 70 - 130% 90
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 70 - 130% 90
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 70 - 130% 90
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 70 - 130% 94
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 70 - 130% 98
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 70 - 130% 94
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 70 - 130% 88
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 70 - 130% 94
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 70 - 130% 104
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 70 - 130% 76
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 70 - 130% 98
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 70 - 130% 94
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 70 - 130% 94
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 70 - 130% 88
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 70 - 130% 94
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 70 - 130% 90
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 70 - 130% 94
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 70 - 130% 100
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 70 - 130% 92
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 70 - 130% 92

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 60 - 130% 79
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 75
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 78
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 76
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 75
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 85
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 77
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 80
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 82
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 98
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 83
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 87
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 83
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 84
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 85
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 79
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 83
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 83
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 80
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 72
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 95
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 87
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 86
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 82

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 60 - 130% 72
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 60 - 130% 74
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 77
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 60 - 130% 71
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 60 - 130% 71
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 75
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 73
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 71
20/2/2017 Page 15 of 52
VOC’s in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433

BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 60 - 130% 73
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 73
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 72
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 60 - 130% 72
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 77
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 60 - 130% 70
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 76
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 60 - 130% 80
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 74
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 60 - 130% 77
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 74
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 60 - 130% 77
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 71
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 72
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 74
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 60 - 130% 78
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 74
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 77
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 60 - 130% 72
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 60 - 130% 70
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 74
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 60 - 130% 71
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 79
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 71
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 60 - 130% 78
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 60 - 130% 71
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 60 - 130% 73
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 71
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 60 - 130% 76
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 77
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 77
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 60 - 130% 76
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 60 - 130% 77
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 79
QD1 SE161954.044 % 60 - 130% 70
QD2 SE161954.045 % 60 - 130% 74
QTB3 SE161954.048 % 60 - 130% 74
QTS3 SE161954.050 % 60 - 130% 109
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 60 - 130% 88
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 60 - 130% 91
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 96
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 60 - 130% 85
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 60 - 130% 88
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 90
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 90
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 92
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 88
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 60 - 130% 89
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 98
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 79
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 60 - 130% 82
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 100
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 60 - 130% 88
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 94
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 60 - 130% 82
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 97
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 60 - 130% 79
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 81
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 60 - 130% 77
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 91
20/2/2017 Page 16 of 52

BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 91
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 60 - 130% 83
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 87
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 88
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 60 - 130% 90
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 60 - 130% 82
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 90
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 60 - 130% 90
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 90
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 87
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 60 - 130% 85
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 60 - 130% 92
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 60 - 130% 80
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 92
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 60 - 130% 81
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 86
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 91
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 60 - 130% 99
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 60 - 130% 95
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 88
QD1 SE161954.044 % 60 - 130% 86
QD2 SE161954.045 % 60 - 130% 90
QTB3 SE161954.048 % 60 - 130% 97
QTS3 SE161954.050 % 60 - 130% 84
d8-toluene (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 60 - 130% 84
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 60 - 130% 87
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 92
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 60 - 130% 81
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 60 - 130% 84
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 80
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 80
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 82
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 82
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 60 - 130% 83
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 90
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 74
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 60 - 130% 71
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 92
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 60 - 130% 79
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 88
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 60 - 130% 73
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 91
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 60 - 130% 71
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 74
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 60 - 130% 72
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 86
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 85
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 85
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 60 - 130% 74
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 81
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 79
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 60 - 130% 84
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 60 - 130% 75
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 81
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 60 - 130% 83
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 83
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 82
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 60 - 130% 78
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 60 - 130% 85
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 60 - 130% 71
20/2/2017 Page 17 of 52

BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 60 - 130% 74
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 78
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 85
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 60 - 130% 93
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 60 - 130% 85
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 80
QD1 SE161954.044 % 60 - 130% 81
QD2 SE161954.045 % 60 - 130% 82
QTB3 SE161954.048 % 60 - 130% 86
QTS3 SE161954.050 % 60 - 130% 83
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) BH101 0.1-0.2 SE161954.001 % 60 - 130% 86
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 60 - 130% 86
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 90
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 60 - 130% 81
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 60 - 130% 85
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 83
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 85
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 88
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 86
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 60 - 130% 87
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 94
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 77
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 60 - 130% 76
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 96
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 60 - 130% 84
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 91
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 60 - 130% 77
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 93
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 60 - 130% 73
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 78
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 60 - 130% 72
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 86
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 86
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 84
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 60 - 130% 78
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 84
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 83
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 60 - 130% 83
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 60 - 130% 77
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 88
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 60 - 130% 85
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 87
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 86
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 60 - 130% 82
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 60 - 130% 91
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 60 - 130% 75
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 87
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 60 - 130% 80
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 80
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 84
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 60 - 130% 95
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 60 - 130% 90
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 80
QD1 SE161954.044 % 60 - 130% 83
QD2 SE161954.045 % 60 - 130% 81
QTB3 SE161954.048 % 60 - 130% 92
QTS3 SE161954.050 % 60 - 130% 80

Parameter Sample Name Sample Number Units
20/2/2017 Page 18 of 52

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) QTB1 SE161954.046 % 40 - 130% 85
QTB2 SE161954.047 % 40 - 130% 77
QTS2 SE161954.049 % 40 - 130% 104
QR1 SE161954.051 % 40 - 130% 79
QR2 SE161954.052 % 40 - 130% 76
QR3 SE161954.053 % 40 - 130% 80
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) QTB1 SE161954.046 % 40 - 130% 90
QTB2 SE161954.047 % 40 - 130% 93
QTS2 SE161954.049 % 40 - 130% 79
QR1 SE161954.051 % 40 - 130% 98
QR2 SE161954.052 % 40 - 130% 93
QR3 SE161954.053 % 40 - 130% 102
d8-toluene (Surrogate) QTB1 SE161954.046 % 40 - 130% 94
QTB2 SE161954.047 % 40 - 130% 93
QTS2 SE161954.049 % 40 - 130% 89
QR1 SE161954.051 % 40 - 130% 95
QR2 SE161954.052 % 40 - 130% 87
QR3 SE161954.053 % 40 - 130% 93
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) QTB1 SE161954.046 % 40 - 130% 93
QTB2 SE161954.047 % 40 - 130% 95
QTS2 SE161954.049 % 40 - 130% 81
QR1 SE161954.051 % 40 - 130% 102
QR2 SE161954.052 % 40 - 130% 97
QR3 SE161954.053 % 40 - 130% 108

BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 60 - 130% 74
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 77
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 60 - 130% 71
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 60 - 130% 71
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 75
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 73
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 71
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 73
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 60 - 130% 73
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 73
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 72
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 60 - 130% 72
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 77
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 60 - 130% 70
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 76
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 60 - 130% 80
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 74
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 60 - 130% 77
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 74
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 60 - 130% 77
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 71
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 72
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 74
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 60 - 130% 78
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 74
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 77
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 60 - 130% 72
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 60 - 130% 70
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 74
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 60 - 130% 71
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 79
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 71
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 60 - 130% 78
20/2/2017 Page 19 of 52
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 60 - 130% 71
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 60 - 130% 73
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 71
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 60 - 130% 76
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 77
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 77
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 60 - 130% 76
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 60 - 130% 77
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 79
QD1 SE161954.044 % 60 - 130% 70
QD2 SE161954.045 % 60 - 130% 74
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 60 - 130% 91
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 96
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 60 - 130% 85
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 60 - 130% 88
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 90
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 90
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 92
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 88
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 60 - 130% 89
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 98
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 79
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 60 - 130% 82
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 100
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 60 - 130% 88
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 94
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 60 - 130% 82
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 97
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 60 - 130% 79
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 81
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 60 - 130% 77
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 91
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 88
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 91
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 60 - 130% 83
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 87
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 88
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 60 - 130% 90
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 60 - 130% 82
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 90
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 60 - 130% 90
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 90
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 87
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 60 - 130% 85
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 60 - 130% 92
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 60 - 130% 80
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 92
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 60 - 130% 81
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 86
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 91
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 60 - 130% 99
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 60 - 130% 95
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 88
QD1 SE161954.044 % 60 - 130% 86
QD2 SE161954.045 % 60 - 130% 90
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 60 - 130% 87
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 92
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 60 - 130% 81
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 60 - 130% 84
20/2/2017 Page 20 of 52

BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 80
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 82
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 82
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 60 - 130% 83
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 90
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 74
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 60 - 130% 71
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 92
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 60 - 130% 79
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 88
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 60 - 130% 73
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 91
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 60 - 130% 71
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 74
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 60 - 130% 72
BH113 0.1-0.2 SE161954.022 % 60 - 130% 86
BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 85
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 85
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 60 - 130% 74
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 81
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 79
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 60 - 130% 84
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 60 - 130% 75
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 81
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 60 - 130% 83
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 83
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 82
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 60 - 130% 78
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 60 - 130% 85
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 60 - 130% 71
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 84
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 60 - 130% 74
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 78
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 85
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 60 - 130% 93
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 60 - 130% 85
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 80
QD1 SE161954.044 % 60 - 130% 81
QD2 SE161954.045 % 60 - 130% 82
BH101 1.5-1.6 SE161954.002 % 60 - 130% 86
BH102 0.1-0.2 SE161954.003 % 60 - 130% 90
BH102 1.0-1.1 SE161954.004 % 60 - 130% 81
BH102 3.5-3.6 SE161954.005 % 60 - 130% 85
BH103 0.1-0.2 SE161954.006 % 60 - 130% 83
BH104 0.2-0.3 SE161954.007 % 60 - 130% 85
BH105W 0.2-0.3 SE161954.008 % 60 - 130% 88
BH106 0.1-0.2 SE161954.009 % 60 - 130% 86
BH106 0.5-0.6 SE161954.010 % 60 - 130% 87
BH107 0.1-0.2 SE161954.011 % 60 - 130% 94
BH108 0.1-0.2 SE161954.012 % 60 - 130% 77
BH108 0.5-0.6 SE161954.013 % 60 - 130% 76
BH109 0.1-0.2 SE161954.014 % 60 - 130% 96
BH109 0.5-0.6 SE161954.015 % 60 - 130% 84
BH110 0.1-0.2 SE161954.016 % 60 - 130% 91
BH110 0.5-0.6 SE161954.017 % 60 - 130% 77
BH111 0.1-0.2 SE161954.018 % 60 - 130% 93
BH111 1.0-1.1 SE161954.019 % 60 - 130% 73
BH112 0.1-0.2 SE161954.020 % 60 - 130% 78
BH112 0.5-0.6 SE161954.021 % 60 - 130% 72
20/2/2017 Page 21 of 52

BH114 0.1-0.2 SE161954.023 % 60 - 130% 86
BH115 0.1-0.2 SE161954.024 % 60 - 130% 84
BH115 0.5-0.6 SE161954.025 % 60 - 130% 78
BH116 0.1-0.2 SE161954.026 % 60 - 130% 84
BH117W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.027 % 60 - 130% 83
BH117W 1.0-1.1 SE161954.028 % 60 - 130% 83
BH117W 2.5-2.6 SE161954.029 % 60 - 130% 77
BH118 0.1-0.2 SE161954.030 % 60 - 130% 88
BH118 2.0-2.1 SE161954.031 % 60 - 130% 85
BH119 0.1-0.2 SE161954.032 % 60 - 130% 87
BH120W 0.1-0.2 SE161954.033 % 60 - 130% 86
BH120W 0.5-0.6 SE161954.034 % 60 - 130% 82
BH120W 1.5-1.6 SE161954.035 % 60 - 130% 91
BH121 0.5-0.6 SE161954.036 % 60 - 130% 75
BH122 0.1-0.2 SE161954.037 % 60 - 130% 87
BH122 1.0-1.1 SE161954.038 % 60 - 130% 80
BH123 0.1-0.2 SE161954.039 % 60 - 130% 80
BH124 0.1-0.2 SE161954.040 % 60 - 130% 84
BH124 1.5-1.6 SE161954.041 % 60 - 130% 95
BH124 3.3-3.4 SE161954.042 % 60 - 130% 90
BH125 0.1-0.2 SE161954.043 % 60 - 130% 80
QD1 SE161954.044 % 60 - 130% 83
QD2 SE161954.045 % 60 - 130% 81

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) QR1 SE161954.051 % 40 - 130% 79
QR2 SE161954.052 % 40 - 130% 76
QR3 SE161954.053 % 40 - 130% 80
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) QR1 SE161954.051 % 60 - 130% 98
QR2 SE161954.052 % 60 - 130% 93
QR3 SE161954.053 % 60 - 130% 102
d8-toluene (Surrogate) QR1 SE161954.051 % 40 - 130% 95
QR2 SE161954.052 % 40 - 130% 87
QR3 SE161954.053 % 40 - 130% 93
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) QR1 SE161954.051 % 40 - 130% 102
QR2 SE161954.052 % 40 - 130% 97
QR3 SE161954.053 % 40 - 130% 108
20/2/2017 Page 22 of 52
METHOD BLANKS SE161954 R0
Blank results are evaluated against the limit of reporting (LOR), for the chosen method and its associated instrumentation, typically 2.5 times the statistically determined
method detection limit (MDL).
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.

Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB118785.001 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001

LB118796.001 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05
LB118797.001 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05
LB118798.001 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05

LB118680.001 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) % - 71
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
20/2/2017 Page 23 of 52
OC Pesticides in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

LB118682.001 Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

LB118680.001 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) % - 90
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) % - 78
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
20/2/2017 Page 24 of 52

LB118682.001 Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

LB118680.001 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) % - 88
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) % - 90
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
20/2/2017 Page 25 of 52

LB118682.001 Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

LB118680.001 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1
LB118681.001 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
LB118682.001 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

LB118804.001 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 <3
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 <0.3
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 <1
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 <1
20/2/2017 Page 26 of 52
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil/Waste Solids/Materials by ICPOES (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320

LB118806.001 Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 <1

LB118743.001 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 <1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 <1
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5

LB118680.001 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110
LB118681.001 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100
LB118682.001 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100

LB118777.001 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200

LB118676.001 Monocyclic Aromatic Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Hydrocarbons Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) % - 86
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) % - 86
d8-toluene (Surrogate) % - 76
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) % - 75
Totals Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6
20/2/2017 Page 27 of 52


LB118700.001 Monocyclic Aromatic Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Hydrocarbons Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5

LB118676.001 TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20
LB118677.001 TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20
LB118684.001 TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20

LB118700.001 TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40
20/2/2017 Page 28 of 52
DUPLICATES SE161954 R0
Duplicates are calculated as Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit
(SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR
Where the Maximum Allowable Difference evaluates to a number larger than 200 it is displayed as 200.
RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of
this report for failure reasons.

Original Duplicate Parameter Units LOR Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE161954.008 LB118796.014 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 200 0
Moisture Content Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN002

SE161954.010 LB118707.011 % Moisture %w/w 0.5 21 21 35 1
SE161954.020 LB118707.022 % Moisture %w/w 0.5 11 13 38 15
SE161954.030 LB118707.033 % Moisture %w/w 0.5 12 11 39 9
SE161954.040 LB118707.044 % Moisture %w/w 0.5 15 13 37 13
SE161954.048 LB118707.051 % Moisture %w/w 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 200 0

SE161954.008 LB118680.027 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.11 0.115 30 2
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.057 200 0
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.065 194 0
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
20/2/2017 Page 29 of 52

SE161954.018 LB118680.028 Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
SE161954.040 LB118681.025 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
20/2/2017 Page 30 of 52

SE161954.040 LB118681.025 Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
SE161964.009 LB118682.023 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
20/2/2017 Page 31 of 52

SE161954.008 LB118680.027 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0.05 200 0
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.01 200 0
Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.44 30 2
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.54 30 8
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.06 200 0
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0.05 200 0
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.05 200 0
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
SE161954.040 LB118681.025 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 200 0
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 200 0
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 200 0
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 200 0
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0

SE161954.008 LB118680.027 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.01 200 0
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
20/2/2017 Page 32 of 52

SE161954.008 LB118680.027 Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.03 200 0
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.03 200 0
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.1 141 0
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.09 148 0
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.06 200 0
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.04 200 0
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.07 197 0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.02 200 0
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.04 200 0
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.03 200 0
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.03 200 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 0.242 134 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 0.121 175 0
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 0.1 200 0
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.46 30 2
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.44 30 2
SE161954.018 LB118680.028 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.02 200 0
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.02 200 0
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.05 184 0
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.06 184 0
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.06 200 0
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.05 200 0
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.08 197 0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.02 200 0
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.03 200 0
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.04 200 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 0.121 175 0
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 0 200 0
SE161954.026 LB118681.027 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.01 200 0
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.01 200 0
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.05 200 0
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.06 197 0
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.14 99 7
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.17 89 0
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.12 113 0
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.09 148 0
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.12 107 15
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 130 0
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.1 125 10
20/2/2017 Page 33 of 52

SE161954.026 LB118681.027 Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.09 135 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 0.134 152 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 0.2 0.19 112 1
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 0.9 0.75 128 11
SE161954.040 LB118681.025 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 155 0
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 197 0
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 0.6 0.6 46 8
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.2 113 46
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.6 0.8 44 24
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.7 0.8 43 1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0.4 0.4 57 3
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 0.3 0.3 60 3
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.5 0.4 54 19
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 80 10
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 81 5
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 91 6
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 0.4 0.4 56 3
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 0.5 0.5 66 3
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 3.9 4.3 49 9
SE161964.009 LB118682.023 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 0.01 200 0
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 0 0 200 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 0 0 200 0
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 0.242 0.242 134 0
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 0 0 200 0

Original Duplicate Parameter Units LOR
20/2/2017 Page 34 of 52

SE161954.008 LB118680.026 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1 0 200 0
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 0.115 30 2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
SE161954.040 LB118681.025 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1 <1 200 0
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 0 30 1
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
SE161964.009 LB118682.023 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
20/2/2017 Page 35 of 52

SE161964.009 LB118682.023 Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 0 0 200 0
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 0 0 200 0

SE161954.010 LB118804.014 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 7 9 42 23
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.4 0.4 105 5
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 26 27 32 5
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 35 33 31 7
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 65 62 32 3
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 3.7 3.3 44 11
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 57 54 34 5
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.6 0.6 80 2
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 30 34 32 12
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 35 39 33 11
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 6.6 6.2 38 6
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 34 39 35 12
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.3 0.4 118 13
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 11 12 34 1
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 24 23 34 2
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 5.1 4.6 40 10
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 18 14 42 24
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 135 0
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 12 24 33 63 ②
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 22 22 35 1
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 8.2 8.9 36 8
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 20 23 39 14
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 0.4 0.4 103 0
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 19 21 33 5
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 40 44 32 9
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 5.0 4.5 40 11
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 28 30 37 8

SE161973.005 LB118743.014 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 6.725 6.795 30 1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 0.035 0.036 200 0
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 6.362 6.322 31 1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 27.034 26.652 19 1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 0.447 0.446 200 0
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 19.292 19.653 20 2
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 94.124 94.782 20 1
SE161994.001 LB118743.027 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 9.813 9.883 25 1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 0.005 0.003 200 0
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 0.362 0.34 200 0
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 0.298 0.28 200 0
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 0.022 0.013 200 0
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 0.703 0.934 137 0
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 3.309 3.397 164 0
20/2/2017 Page 36 of 52

SE161954.008 LB118680.027 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 0 200 0
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 0 200 0
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 0 200 0
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 0 200 0
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 0 200 0
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 0 200 0
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 0 200 0
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 <25 0 200 0
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 0 200 0
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 0 200 0
SE161954.018 LB118680.028 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 0 200 0
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 58 59 107 2
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 65 67 98 3
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 0 200 0
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 120 126 118 2
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 104 200 0
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 100 104 117 1
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 0 200 0
SE161954.026 LB118681.027 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 26 18 121 26
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 56 62 106 10
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 0 200 0
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 0 200 0
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 80 166 0
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 116 200 0
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 32 24 119 25
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 32 24 119 25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 92 133 2
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 0 200 0
SE161954.040 LB118681.025 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 70 72 93 3
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 65 69 97 6
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 200 0
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 140 140 110 4
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 193 0
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 130 130 100 5
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 200 0
SE161954.043 LB118682.024 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 0 200 0
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 46 136 2
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 56 125 22
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 0 200 0
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 102 152 0
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 95 200 0
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 95 138 5
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 0 200 0
SE161964.009 LB118682.023 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 0 0 200 0
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 0 0 200 0
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 0 0 200 0
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 0 0 200 0
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 0 0 200 0
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 0 0 200 0
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 0 0 200 0
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 0 0 200 0
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 0 0 200 0
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 0 0 200 0
20/2/2017 Page 37 of 52

SE161954.053 LB118777.022 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50 0 200 0
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200 0 200 0
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200 0 200 0
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200 0 200 0
TRH C10-C36 µg/L 450 <450 0 200 0
TRH C10-C40 µg/L 650 <650 0 200 0
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 <60 0 200 0
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 <500 0 200 0
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 <500 0 200 0

SE161954.010 LB118676.014 Monocyclic Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Aromatic Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Polycyclic Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
VOCs
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 4.3 50 2
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.5 4.6 50 2
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.2 4.2 50 1
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 3.7 3.7 50 2
Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 200 0
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 200 0
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
VOCs
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 200 0
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
VOCs
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 200 0
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
VOCs
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 200 0
SE161954.045 LB118684.014 Monocyclic Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Aromatic
20/2/2017 Page 38 of 52

SE161954.045 LB118684.014 Monocyclic Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.01 200 0
Aromatic Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.01 200 0
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.03 200 0
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.02 200 0
Polycyclic Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.01 200 0
VOCs
Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 0.05 200 0
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 0.07 200 0

SE161954.053 LB118700.018 Monocyclic Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0.07 200 0
Aromatic Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0.42 157 0
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0.02 200 0
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1 0.06 200 0
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0.02 200 0
Polycyclic Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0.04 200 0
VOCs
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.4 5.57 30 3
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.1 5.28 30 3
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.6 5.32 30 14
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.0 4.43 30 10

SE161954.010 LB118676.014 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0
VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
SE161954.020 LB118676.025 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0
SE161954.030 LB118677.014 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0
SE161954.040 LB118677.025 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0
SE161954.045 LB118684.014 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 0 200 0
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 0 200 0
20/2/2017 Page 39 of 52

SE161954.045 LB118684.014 Surrogates d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.5 4.37 30 3
VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 -0.07 200 0

SE161929.001 LB118700.017 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 0 0 200 0
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 0 0 200 0
VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.5 0.01 0.01 200 0
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 -0.03 -0.04 200 0
SE161954.053 LB118700.018 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50 0 200 0
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40 0 200 0
VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0.07 200 0
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50 -0.59 200 0
20/2/2017 Page 40 of 52
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES SE161954 R0
Laboratory Control Standard (LCS) results are evaluated against an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into the control during the sample
preparation stage, producing a percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For
more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.
Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.

Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB118796.002 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 0.19 0.2 70 - 130 97
LB118797.002 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 0.21 0.2 70 - 130 103
LB118798.002 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 0.20 0.2 70 - 130 98

LB118680.002 Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 80
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 86
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 80
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.2 60 - 140 79
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.2 60 - 140 79
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 76
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.14 0.15 40 - 130 93
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 101
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 114
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 105
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 116
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 114
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 101
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 114
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 105
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 116
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 114

LB118680.002 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 1.5 2 60 - 140 76
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 1.6 2 60 - 140 78
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 2.1 2 60 - 140 106
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 1.6 2 60 - 140 81
Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 86
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.5 40 - 130 94
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 1.5 2 60 - 140 77
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 1.8 2 60 - 140 92

LB118680.002 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 4.0 4 60 - 140 99
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 3.4 4 60 - 140 85
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 4.1 4 60 - 140 102
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 4.1 4 60 - 140 103
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 4.2 4 60 - 140 106
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 5.0 4 60 - 140 125
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 4.4 4 60 - 140 109
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 4.6 4 60 - 140 114
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 88
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 86
20/2/2017 Page 41 of 52

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 4.0 4 60 - 140 101
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 4.2 4 60 - 140 105
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 3.5 4 60 - 140 87
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 4.2 4 60 - 140 105

LB118680.002 Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 0.5 0.4 60 - 140 115
LB118681.002 Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 0.5 0.4 60 - 140 123
LB118682.002 Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 0.5 0.4 60 - 140 123

LB118804.002 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 50 50 80 - 120 100
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 51 50 80 - 120 102
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 50 50 80 - 120 99
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 50 50 80 - 120 101
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 50 50 80 - 120 99
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 51 50 80 - 120 102
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 51 50 80 - 120 101
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 48 50 80 - 120 97
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 49 50 80 - 120 99
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 49 50 80 - 120 98
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 48 50 80 - 120 96
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 50 50 80 - 120 100
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 49 50 80 - 120 99
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 51 50 80 - 120 102
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 50 50 80 - 120 101
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 51 50 80 - 120 102
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 50 50 80 - 120 100
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 52 50 80 - 120 103
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 50 50 80 - 120 101

LB118743.002 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 19 20 80 - 120 97
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 20 80 - 120 100
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 101
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 103
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 107
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 101
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 20 20 80 - 120 101
20/2/2017 Page 42 of 52

LB118680.002 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 42 40 60 - 140 105
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 40 60 - 140 103
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 40 60 - 140 100
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 42 40 60 - 140 105
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 40 60 - 140 103
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 20 60 - 140 100
LB118681.002 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 40 40 60 - 140 100
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 40 60 - 140 110
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 40 60 - 140 93
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 40 60 - 140 105
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 20 60 - 140 95
LB118682.002 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 49 40 60 - 140 123
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 49 40 60 - 140 123
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 45 40 60 - 140 113
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 40 60 - 140 118
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 20 60 - 140 115

LB118777.002 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 1000 1200 60 - 140 83
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 1200 1200 60 - 140 104
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 1300 1200 60 - 140 109
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 1100 1200 60 - 140 92
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 1300 1200 60 - 140 107
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 700 600 60 - 140 117

LB118676.002 Monocyclic Benzene mg/kg 0.1 2.3 2.9 60 - 140 81
Aromatic Toluene mg/kg 0.1 1.9 2.9 60 - 140 67
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 2.0 2.9 60 - 140 68
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 4.7 5.8 60 - 140 81
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 2.0 2.9 60 - 140 70
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.0 5 60 - 140 81
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.0 5 60 - 140 79
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.1 5 60 - 140 82
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.5 5 60 - 140 110
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 4.6 5.8 60 - 140 79
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 2.0 2.9 60 - 140 67
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 5.4 5.8 60 - 140 94
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 2.3 2.9 60 - 140 81

Sample Number Parameter Units LOR
20/2/2017 Page 43 of 52

LB118700.002 Monocyclic Benzene µg/L 0.5 51 45.45 60 - 140 112
Aromatic Toluene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 114
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 114
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 100 90.9 60 - 140 113
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 114
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.4 5 60 - 140 87
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.5 5 60 - 140 89
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 94
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.2 5 60 - 140 104

LB118676.002 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 24.65 60 - 140 89
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 23.2 60 - 140 79
VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 7.25 60 - 140 125
LB118677.002 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 24.65 60 - 140 85
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 23.2 60 - 140 76
LB118684.002 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 24.65 60 - 140 94
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 23.2 60 - 140 84

LB118700.002 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 940 946.63 60 - 140 99
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 770 818.71 60 - 140 94
VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 630 639.67 60 - 140 98
20/2/2017 Page 44 of 52
MATRIX SPIKES SE161954 R0
Matrix Spike (MS) results are evaluated as the percentage recovery of an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into a field sub -sample during the
sample preparation stage. The original sample 's result is subtracted from the sub -sample result before determining the percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the
percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA/QC plan (ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.
Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the
end of this report for failure reasons.

QC Sample Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result Original Spike Recovery%
SE161954.051 LB118785.004 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 0.0080 <0.0001 0.008 100

SE161926.002 LB118796.004 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 0.47 0.46 0.2 7④
SE161954.018 LB118797.004 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 0.18 <0.05 0.2 80
SE161954.035 LB118798.004 Mercury mg/kg 0.05 0.18 <0.05 0.2 75

QC Sample Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Original Spike Recovery%
SE161954.023 LB118681.026 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.2 101
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.2 100
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.2 114
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.2 106
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.2 122
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0.2 119
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.13 - 84
SE161964.002 LB118682.022 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 0 0.2 80
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 0 0.2 91
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0 0.2 112
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 0 - -
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 0 0.2 87
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 0 0.2 103
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 0 - -
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0 0.2 121
20/2/2017 Page 45 of 52

SE161964.002 LB118682.022 Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 0 - -

SE161954.023 LB118681.026 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 2 83
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 - -
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 2 95
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 2 87
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 - -
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 2 94
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 - 96
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 - 100

SE161954.002 LB118680.026 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 98
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 92
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 100
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 101
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 102
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 117
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 104
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 106
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 <0.2 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 - -
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 - -
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 - 90
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 - 84
SE161954.023 LB118681.026 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 106
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 101
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 107
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 110
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 117
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 4 111
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.2 4 112
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
20/2/2017 Page 46 of 52

SE161954.023 LB118681.026 Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.1 - -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 119
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 <0.2 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 <0.3 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 <0.2 - -
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 - -
SE161964.002 LB118682.022 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 0 4 101
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 0 4 120
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 0 4 96
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 0 4 82
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0 4 90
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 4 105
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 4 103
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 - -
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 - -
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 - -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 - -
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 4 122
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 0 - -
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 0.01 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=0 TEQ 0.2 0 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR TEQ (mg/kg) 0.3 0.242 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs, BaP TEQ <LOR=LOR/2 TEQ (mg/kg) 0.2 0.121 - -
Total PAH (18) mg/kg 0.8 0 - -

SE161954.023 LB118681.026 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0.4 120
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 - -
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1 - -
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 - 83
SE161964.002 LB118682.022 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 0 - -
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 0 - -
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 0 0.4 112
20/2/2017 Page 47 of 52

SE161964.002 LB118682.022 Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 0 - -
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 0 - -

SE161952.001 LB118806.004 Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 51 6 50 90
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 45 0.3 50 90
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 72 26 50 92
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 66 21 50 90
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 55 13 50 85
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 67 22 50 90
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 45 <0.3 50 90
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 54 7.7 50 93
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 60 13 50 94
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 60 18 50 84
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 51 5.6 50 91
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 86 41 50 89

SE161948.001 LB118743.004 Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 680 670 20 50 ④

SE161954.023 LB118681.026 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 40 115
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 40 123
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 40 113
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 - -
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 - -
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 - -
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 40 120
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 <25 - -
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 40 123
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 - -
SE161964.002 LB118682.022 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 0 40 108
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 0 40 123
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 0 40 115
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 0 - -
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 0 - -
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 23 - -
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 0 40 110
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 0 - -
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 23 40 78
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 0 - -

SE161671A.00 LB118684.004 Monocyclic Benzene mg/kg 0.1 2.1 <0.1 2.9 72
2 Aromatic Toluene mg/kg 0.1 1.8 <0.1 2.9 60
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 1.8 <0.1 2.9 62
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 4.3 <0.2 5.8 74
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 1.9 <0.1 2.9 64
Polycyclic Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - -
VOCs
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 3.6 4.3 - 72
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 3.8 4.6 - 76
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.0 4.5 - 79
20/2/2017 Page 48 of 52

SE161671A.00 LB118684.004 Surrogates Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.4 3.8 - 107
2 Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 6.2 <0.3 - -
Total BTEX mg/kg 0.6 12 <0.6 - -
SE161954.001 LB118676.004 Monocyclic Benzene mg/kg 0.1 2.4 <0.1 2.9 82
Aromatic Toluene mg/kg 0.1 2.0 <0.1 2.9 68
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 4.7 <0.2 5.8 81
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 2.0 <0.1 2.9 69
VOCs
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.4 3.6 - 108
Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 6.8 <0.3 - -
SE161954.021 LB118677.004 Monocyclic Benzene mg/kg 0.1 2.1 <0.1 2.9 72
Aromatic Toluene mg/kg 0.1 2.3 <0.1 2.9 78
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 4.0 <0.2 5.8 68
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 1.9 <0.1 2.9 63
VOCs
Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 5.8 <0.3 - -

SE161954.051 LB118700.019 Monocyclic Benzene µg/L 0.5 51 <0.5 45.45 113
Aromatic Toluene µg/L 0.5 51 <0.5 45.45 112
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 51 <0.5 45.45 113
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 97 <1 90.9 107
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 51 <0.5 45.45 112
Polycyclic Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 57 <0.5 - -
VOCs
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.0 5.1 - 79
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.0 4.9 - 80
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.6 4.7 - 93
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.5 3.9 - 109

SE161671A.00 LB118684.004 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 24.65 82
2 TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 23.2 73
VPH F Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 2.1 <0.1 - -
Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 7.25 118
SE161954.001 LB118676.004 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 24.65 87
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 23.2 74
SE161954.021 LB118677.004 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 24.65 83
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 23.2 75
20/2/2017 Page 49 of 52

SE161954.021 LB118677.004 Surrogates d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 3.8 3.9 - 76

SE161954.051 LB118700.019 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 990 <50 946.63 104
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 780 <40 818.71 96
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.0 5.1 - 79
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.0 4.9 - 80
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.6 4.7 - 93
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.5 3.9 - 109
VPH F Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.5 51 <0.5 - -
Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 680 <50 639.67 107
20/2/2017 Page 50 of 52
MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES SE161954 R0
Matrix spike duplicates are calculated as Relative Percent Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The original result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike. The Duplicate result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike duplicate.

QC Sample Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Duplicate
SE161954.002 LB118680.026 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 -
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 -
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 -
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 -
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 -
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 -
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 -
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) - Naphthalene mg/kg 25 -
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 -
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 -
20/2/2017 Page 51 of 52
FOOTNOTES SE161954 R0
QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QA /QC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here :
http://www.sgs.com.au/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/ Technical Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022 QA QC Plan.pdf
* NATA accreditation does not cover tthe performance of this service .

- Sample not analysed for this analyte.
IS Insufficient sample for analysis.

LNR Sample listed, but not received.
LOR Limit of reporting.
QFH QC result is above the upper tolerance.
QFL QC result is below the lower tolerance.
① At least 2 of 3 surrogates are within acceptance criteria.

② RPD failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
③ Results less than 5 times LOR preclude acceptance criteria for RPD.
④ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to matrix interference.
⑤ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to the presence of significant concentration of analyte (i.e. the
concentration of analyte exceeds the spike level).
⑥ LOR was raised due to sample matrix interference.
⑦ LOR was raised due to dilution of significantly high concentration of analyte in sample.
⑧ Reanalysis of sample in duplicate confirmed sample heterogeneity and inconsistency of results.
⑨ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
⑩ LOR was raised due to high conductivity of the sample (required dilution).
† Refer to Analytical Report comments for further information.
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service, available on request and accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/terms-and-conditions. The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined
therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained herein reflects the Company 's findings at the time of its intervention only and
within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a
transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
20/2/2017 Page 52 of 52
ANALYTICAL REPORT

PYRMONT NSW 2009

COMMENTS
No respirable fibres detected in all soil samples using trace analysis technique.
Sample #20: Asbestos found in 5x3mm cement sheet fragments.
Asbestos analysed by Approved Identifiers Ravee Sivasubramaniam and Yusuf Kuthpudin .
SIGNATORIES
Bennet Lo Huong Crawford Kamrul Ahsan

Senior Organic Chemist/Metals Chemist Production Manager Senior Chemist
Ly Kim Ha Ravee Sivasubramaniam

Organic Section Head Hygiene Team Leader
20/02/2017 Page 1 of 4
SE161954 R0
ANALYTICAL REPORT
RESULTS
Fibre Identification in soil Method AN602
Laboratory Client Sample

Matrix Date Sampled Fibre Identification
Reference Reference Description
SE161954.001 BH101 0.1-0.2 Soil 130g Clay 10 Feb 2017 No Asbestos Found <0.01
SE161954.003 BH102 0.1-0.2 Soil 256g Sand, Soil, 10 Feb 2017 No Asbestos Found <0.01
Rocks
SE161954.006 BH103 0.1-0.2 Soil 136g Clay, 10 Feb 2017 No Asbestos Found <0.01
Sand, Soil, Organic Fibres Detected
Rocks
Sand, Rocks
SE161954.008 BH105W 0.2-0.3 Soil 152g Clay, 09 Feb 2017 No Asbestos Found <0.01
Sand, Rocks
Rocks
SE161954.011 BH107 0.1-0.2 Soil 81g Clay, Sand, 10 Feb 2017 No Asbestos Found <0.01
Soil, Rocks Organic Fibres Detected
Rocks
SE161954.014 BH109 0.1-0.2 Soil 160g Clay, Soil, 10 Feb 2017 No Asbestos Found <0.01
Rocks
Soil, Rocks
Sand, Soil,
Rocks
SE161954.020 BH112 0.1-0.2 Soil 129g Clay, 08 Feb 2017 Chrysotile Asbestos Found >0.01
Sand, Soil,
Rocks
Rocks Organic Fibres Detected
Rocks
Sand, Soil,
Rocks
Soil, Rocks
SE161954.027 BH117W 0.1-0.2 Soil 102g Clay, 08 Feb 2017 No Asbestos Found <0.01
Sand, Soil,
Rocks
Sand, Soil,
Rocks
Rocks
SE161954.033 BH120W 0.1-0.2 Soil 140 Clay, Sand, 08 Feb 2017 No Asbestos Found <0.01
Soil, Rocks Organic Fibres Detected
Rocks
Rocks
Sand, Rocks
20/02/2017 Page 2 of 4
SE161954 R0
ANALYTICAL REPORT
RESULTS
Fibre Identification in soil Method AN602
Laboratory Client Sample

Matrix Date Sampled Fibre Identification Est.%w/w*
Reference Reference Description
Sand, Soil,
Rocks
20/02/2017 Page 3 of 4
SE161954 R0
METHOD SUMMARY
AN602 Qualitative identification of chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite in bulk samples by polarised light microscopy (PLM)
in conjunction with dispersion staining (DS). AS4964 provides the basis for this document. Unequivocal
identification of the asbestos minerals present is made by obtaining sufficient diagnostic `clues`, which provide a
reasonable degree of certainty, dispersion staining is a mandatory `clue` for positive identification. If sufficient
`clues` are absent, then positive identification of asbestos is not possible. This procedure requires removal of
suspect fibres/bundles from the sample which cannot be returned.
AN602 Fibres/material that cannot be unequivocably identified as one of the three asbestos forms, will be reported as
unknown mineral fibres (umf).
AN602 AS4964.2004 Method for the Qualitative Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Samples , Section 8.4, Trace Analysis
Criteria, Note 4 states:"Depending upon sample condition and fibre type, the detection limit of this technique has
been found to lie generally in the range of 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 parts by weight, equivalent to 1 to 0.1 g/kg."
AN602 The sample can be reported “no asbestos found at the reporting limit of 0.1 g/kg” (<0.01%w/w) where AN602
section 4.5 of this method has been followed, and if-
(a) no trace asbestos fibres have been detected (i.e. no ‘respirable’ fibres):
(b) the estimated weight of non-respirable asbestos fibre bundles and/or the estimated weight of asbestos in
asbestos-containing materials are found to be less than 0.1g/kg: and
(c) these non-respirable asbestos fibre bundles and/or the asbestos containing materials are only visible under
stereo-microscope viewing conditions.
FOOTNOTES
Amosite - Brown Asbestos NA - Not Analysed

Chrysotile - White Asbestos LNR - Listed, Not Required
Crocidolite - Blue Asbestos * - NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service .
Amphiboles - Amosite and/or Crocidolite ** - Indicative data, theoretical holding time exceeded.
(In reference to soil samples only) This report does not comply with the analytical reporting recommendations in the Western Australian Department
of Health Guidelines for the Assessment and Remediation and Management of Asbestos Contaminated sites in Western Australia - May 2009.
Sampled by the client.
Where reported: 'Asbestos Detected': Asbestos detected by polarised light microscopy, including dispersion staining.
Where reported: 'No Asbestos Found': No Asbestos Found by polarised light microscopy , including dispersion staining.
Where reported: 'UMF Detected': Mineral fibres of unknown type detected by polarised light microscopy, including dispersion staining. Confirmation
by another independent analytical technique may be necessary.
Even after disintegration it can be very difficult, or impossible, to detect the presence of asbestos in some asbestos -containing bulk materials using
polarised light microscopy. This is due to the low grade or small length or diameter of asbestos fibres present in the material, or to the fact that very
fine fibres have been distributed intimately throughout the materials.
defined therein.
20/02/2017 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 161762
Client:
EI Australia
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
Pyrmont
NSW 2009
Attention: Joel Heninger
Sample log in details:

Your Reference: E23061, 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde
No. of samples: 3 Soils
Date samples received / completed instructions received 13/02/17 / 13/02/17
Analysis Details:
Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.
Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.
Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.
Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.
Report Details:
Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 20/02/17 / 17/02/17
Date of Preliminary Report: Not Issued
NATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.
Results Approved By:
Envirolab Reference: 161762 Page 1 of 9

Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E23061, 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Our Reference: UNITS 161762-1 161762-2
Your Reference ------------ QT1 QT2
-
Date Sampled ------------ 8/02/2017 9/02/2017
Type of sample Soil Soil
Date extracted - 14/02/2017 14/02/2017

Date analysed - 16/02/2017 16/02/2017
TRHC 6 - C 9 mg/kg <25 <25
TRHC 6 - C 10 mg/kg <25 <25
vTPH C6 - C 10 less BTEX mg/kg <25 <25
(F1)
Benzene mg/kg <0.2 <0.2
Toluene mg/kg <0.5 <0.5
Ethylbenzene mg/kg <1 <1
m+p-xylene mg/kg <2 <2
o-Xylene mg/kg <1 <1
Total +ve Xylenes mg/kg <1 <1
naphthalene mg/kg <1 <1
Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene % 96 95

Revision No: R 00
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil

-
Date Sampled ------------ 8/02/2017 9/02/2017
Date extracted - 14/02/2017 14/02/2017

Date analysed - 15/02/2017 15/02/2017
TRHC 10 - C 14 mg/kg <50 <50
TRHC 15 - C 28 mg/kg <100 <100
TRHC 29 - C 36 mg/kg <100 <100
TRH >C10-C 16 mg/kg <50 <50
TRH >C10 - C 16 less mg/kg <50 <50
Naphthalene (F2)
TRH >C16-C 34 mg/kg <100 <100
TRH >C34-C 40 mg/kg <100 <100
Total +ve TRH (>C10-C40) mg/kg <50 <50
Surrogate o-Terphenyl % 102 103

Revision No: R 00
Acid Extractable metals in soil

-
Date Sampled ------------ 8/02/2017 9/02/2017
Date prepared - 14/02/2017 14/02/2017

Date analysed - 15/02/2017 15/02/2017
Arsenic mg/kg 8 5
Cadmium mg/kg <0.4 <0.4
Chromium mg/kg 28 27
Copper mg/kg 17 18
Lead mg/kg 53 38
Mercury mg/kg <0.1 <0.1
Nickel mg/kg 6 5
Zinc mg/kg 41 23

Revision No: R 00
Moisture
-
Date Sampled ------------ 8/02/2017 9/02/2017
Date prepared - 14/02/2017 14/02/2017

Date analysed - 15/02/2017 15/02/2017
Moisture % 17 15

Revision No: R 00
Method ID Methodology Summary

Org-016 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS.
Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1
Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.
Note, the Total +ve Xylene PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve Xylenes"
is simply a sum of the positive individual Xylenes.
Org-003 Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by
GC-FID.
F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater
(HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis.
GC-FID.
Note, the Total +ve TRH PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve TRH" is
simply a sum of the positive individual TRH fractions (>C10-C40).
Metals-020 Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.
Metals-021 Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.
Inorg-008 Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 °C for a minimum of 12 hours.

Revision No: R 00
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike %
Sm# Recovery
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Soil
Date extracted - 14/02/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 14/02/2017

017
Date analysed - 16/02/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 16/02/2017
017
TRHC 6 - C 9 mg/kg 25 Org-016 <25 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 96%
Benzene mg/kg 0.2 Org-016 <0.2 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 89%
Toluene mg/kg 0.5 Org-016 <0.5 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 99%
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 97%
m+p-xylene mg/kg 2 Org-016 <2 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 98%
o-Xylene mg/kg 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 100%
naphthalene mg/kg 1 Org-014 <1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]
Surrogate aaa- % Org-016 100 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 106%
Trifluorotoluene
Sm# Recovery
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Date extracted - 14/02/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 14/02/2017

017
017
TRH >C10-C 16 mg/kg 50 Org-003 <50 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 108%
Surrogate o-Terphenyl % Org-003 96 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 98%
Sm# Recovery
Acid Extractable metals Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
in soil
Date prepared - 14/02/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 14/02/2017

017
017
Arsenic mg/kg 4 Metals-020 <4 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 115%
Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 Metals-020 <0.4 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 106%
Chromium mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 109%
Copper mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 109%
Lead mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 103%
Mercury mg/kg 0.1 Metals-021 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 87%
Nickel mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 101%
Zinc mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-3 103%

Revision No: R 00
Report Comments:
Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this job
Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job
INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not tested
NR: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required
<: Less than >: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample

Revision No: R 00
Quality Control Definitions

Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,
glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples.
Duplicate : This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample
selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.
Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix
spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist.
LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank
sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.
Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds
which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.
Laboratory Acceptance Criteria

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency
to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix
spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.
Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted
during sample extraction.
Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.
For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.
Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140%
for organics (+/-50% surrogates) and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics
and speciated phenols is acceptable.
In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples
respectively, the sample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.
When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs),
the analysis has proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse
within the THT or as soon as practicable.
Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity
of the analysis where recommended technical holding times may have been breached.
Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.

Revision No: R 00
ANALYTICAL REPORT

PYRMONT NSW 2009

Order Number E23061 Date Received 21/2/2017
Samples 7 Date Reported 27/2/2017
COMMENTS
SIGNATORIES
Andy Sutton Huong Crawford Kamrul Ahsan

Senior Organic Chemist Production Manager Senior Chemist
Ly Kim Ha
Organic Section Head

27/02/2017 Page 1 of 13
VOCs in Water [AN433] Tested: 22/2/2017
BH105W BH117W BH120W GWQD1 GWQR1

- - - - -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017
Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Total Xylenes µg/L 1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5
Total BTEX µg/L 3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) µg/L 5 <5 <5 <5 - -
Chloromethane µg/L 5 <5 <5 <5 - -
Vinyl chloride (Chloroethene) µg/L 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 - -
Bromomethane µg/L 10 <10 <10 <10 - -
Chloroethane µg/L 5 <5 <5 <5 - -
Trichlorofluoromethane µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1 - -
Acetone (2-propanone) µg/L 10 <10 <10 <10 - -
Iodomethane µg/L 5 <5 <5 <5 - -
1,1-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Acrylonitrile µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) µg/L 5 <5 <5 <5 - -
Allyl chloride µg/L 2 <2 <2 <2 - -
Carbon disulfide µg/L 2 <2 <2 <2 - -
trans-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
MtBE (Methyl-tert-butyl ether) µg/L 2 <2 <2 <2 - -
1,1-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Vinyl acetate µg/L 10 <10 <10 <10 - -
MEK (2-butanone) µg/L 10 <10 <10 <10 - -
cis-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Bromochloromethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Chloroform (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
2,2-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,1,1-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,1-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Carbon tetrachloride µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Dibromomethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene,TCE) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
2-nitropropane µg/L 100 <100 <100 <100 - -
Bromodichloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
MIBK (4-methyl-2-pentanone) µg/L 5 <5 <5 <5 - -
cis-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
trans-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,1,2-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Dibromochloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
2-hexanone (MBK) µg/L 5 <5 <5 <5 - -
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethylene,PCE) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Chlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Bromoform (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1 - -
Styrene (Vinyl benzene) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2,3-trichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1 - -
27/02/2017 Page 2 of 13
VOCs in Water [AN433] Tested: 22/2/2017 (continued)

- - - - -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Bromobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
n-propylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
2-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
4-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
tert-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
sec-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,3-dichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
p-isopropyltoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
n-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Hexachlorobutadiene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - -
Total VOC µg/L 10 <10 <10 <10 - -
27/02/2017 Page 3 of 13
GWTS1 GWTB1
WATER WATER
- -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017
Benzene µg/L 0.5 [78%] <0.5
Toluene µg/L 0.5 [86%] <0.5
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 [77%] <0.5
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 [79%] <1
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 [84%] <0.5
Total Xylenes µg/L 1.5 - <1.5
Total BTEX µg/L 3 - <3
Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 - <0.5
Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) µg/L 5 - -
Chloromethane µg/L 5 - -
Vinyl chloride (Chloroethene) µg/L 0.3 - -
Bromomethane µg/L 10 - -
Chloroethane µg/L 5 - -
Trichlorofluoromethane µg/L 1 - -
Acetone (2-propanone) µg/L 10 - -
Iodomethane µg/L 5 - -
1,1-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 - -
Acrylonitrile µg/L 0.5 - -
Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) µg/L 5 - -
Allyl chloride µg/L 2 - -
Carbon disulfide µg/L 2 - -
trans-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 - -
MtBE (Methyl-tert-butyl ether) µg/L 2 - -
1,1-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 - -
Vinyl acetate µg/L 10 - -
MEK (2-butanone) µg/L 10 - -
cis-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 - -
Bromochloromethane µg/L 0.5 - -
Chloroform (THM) µg/L 0.5 - -
2,2-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 - -
1,2-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 - -
1,1,1-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 - -
1,1-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 - -
Carbon tetrachloride µg/L 0.5 - -
Dibromomethane µg/L 0.5 - -
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene,TCE) µg/L 0.5 - -
2-nitropropane µg/L 100 - -
Bromodichloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 - -
MIBK (4-methyl-2-pentanone) µg/L 5 - -
cis-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 - -
trans-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 - -
1,1,2-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 - -
Dibromochloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 - -
2-hexanone (MBK) µg/L 5 - -
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) µg/L 0.5 - -
Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethylene,PCE) µg/L 0.5 - -
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 - -
Chlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
Bromoform (THM) µg/L 0.5 - -
cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 - -
Styrene (Vinyl benzene) µg/L 0.5 - -
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 - -
1,2,3-trichloropropane µg/L 0.5 - -
trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 - -
27/02/2017 Page 4 of 13
GWTS1 GWTB1
WATER WATER
- -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) µg/L 0.5 - -
Bromobenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
n-propylbenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
2-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 - -
4-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 - -
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
tert-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
sec-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
1,3-dichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
p-isopropyltoluene µg/L 0.5 - -
n-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane µg/L 0.5 - -
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
Hexachlorobutadiene µg/L 0.5 - -
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 - -
Total VOC µg/L 10 - -
27/02/2017 Page 5 of 13
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water [AN433] Tested: 22/2/2017

- - - - -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40
Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
27/02/2017 Page 6 of 13
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN403] Tested: 23/2/2017

- - - - -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017
TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 <60 <60 <60 <60 <60
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500
TRH C10-C36 µg/L 450 <450 <450 <450 <450 <450
TRH C10-C40 µg/L 650 <650 <650 <650 <650 <650
27/02/2017 Page 7 of 13
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN420] Tested: 23/2/2017
BH105W BH117W BH120W
WATER WATER WATER

- - -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017
Naphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
1-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluorene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Chrysene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total PAH (18) µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1
27/02/2017 Page 8 of 13
Total Phenolics in Water [AN289] Tested: 23/2/2017
BH105W BH117W BH120W
WATER WATER WATER

- - -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017
Total Phenols mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
27/02/2017 Page 9 of 13
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS [AN318] Tested: 22/2/2017

- - - - -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017
Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 0.8 <0.1 0.1 0.8 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 13 <1 2 12 <1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 90 5 8 95 <1
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 750 26 120 760 <5
27/02/2017 Page 10 of 13
Mercury (dissolved) in Water [AN311(Perth)/AN312] Tested: 24/2/2017

- - - - -
21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017 21/2/2017
Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0047 <0.0001
27/02/2017 Page 11 of 13
AN020 Unpreserved water sample is filtered through a 0.45µm membrane filter and acidified with nitric acid similar to
APHA3030B.
AN289 Analysis of Total Phenols in Soil Sediment and Water: Steam distillable phenols react with 4-aminoantipyrine at pH
7.9±0.1 in the presence of potassium ferricyanide to form a coloured antipyrine dye analysed by Discrete
Analyser. Reference APHA 5530 B/D.
AN311(Perth)/AN312 Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Waters: Mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution
to elemental mercury. This mercury vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption
spectrometer or mercury analyser. Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration
standards. Reference APHA 3112/3500.
AN318 Determination of elements at trace level in waters by ICP-MS technique, in accordance with USEPA 6020A.
AN403 Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons: Determination of Hydrocarbons by gas chromatography after a solvent
extraction. Detection is by flame ionisation detector (FID) that produces an electronic signal in proportion to the
combustible matter passing through it. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) are routinely reported as four
alkane groupings based on the carbon chain length of the compounds: C6-C9, C10-C14, C15-C28 and C29-C36
and in recognition of the NEPM 1999 (2013), >C10-C16 (F2), >C16-C34 (F3) and >C34-C40 (F4). Where F2 is
corrected for Naphthalene, the VOC data for Naphthalene is used.
AN403 Additionally, the volatile C6-C9/C6-C10 fractions may be determined by a purge and trap technique and GC /MS
because of the potential for volatiles loss. Total Recoveerable Hydrocarbons - Silica (TRH-Silica) follows the same
method of analysis after silica gel cleanup of the solvent extract. Aliphatic/Aromatic Speciation follows the same
method of analysis after fractionation of the solvent extract over silica with differential polarity of the eluent
solvents.
AN403 The GC/FID method is not well suited to the analysis of refined high boiling point materials (ie lubricating oils or
greases) but is particularly suited for measuring diesel, kerosene and petrol if care to control volatility is taken. This
method will detect naturally occurring hydrocarbons, lipids, animal fats, phenols and PAHs if they are present at
sufficient levels, dependent on the use of specific cleanup /fractionation techniques. Reference USEPA 3510B,
8015B.
AN420 (SVOCs) including OC, OP, PCB, Herbicides, PAH, Phthalates and Speciated Phenols (etc) in soils, sediments
and waters are determined by GCMS/ECD technique following appropriate solvent extraction process (Based on
USEPA 3500C and 8270D).
AN433 VOCs and C6-C9 Hydrocarbons by GC-MS P&T: VOC`s are volatile organic compounds. The sample is presented
to a gas chromatograph via a purge and trap (P&T) concentrator and autosampler and is detected with a Mass
Spectrometer (MSD). Solid samples are initially extracted with methanol whilst liquid samples are processed
directly. References: USEPA 5030B, 8020A, 8260.
27/02/2017 Page 12 of 13
FOOTNOTES
* NATA accreditation does not cover - Not analysed. UOM Unit of Measure.
the performance of this service. NVL Not validated. LOR Limit of Reporting.
** Indicative data, theoretical holding IS Insufficient sample for analysis. ↑↓ Raised/lowered Limit of
time exceeded. LNR Sample listed, but not received. Reporting.

Where "Total" analyte groups are reported (for example, Total PAHs, Total OC Pesticides) the total will be calculated as the sum of the individual
analytes, with those analytes that are reported as <LOR being assumed to be zero. The summed (Total) limit of reporting is calculated by summing
the individual analyte LORs and dividing by two. For example, where 16 individual analytes are being summed and each has an LOR of 0.1 mg/kg,
the "Totals" LOR will be 1.6 / 2 (0.8 mg/kg). Where only 2 analytes are being summed, the " Total" LOR will be the sum of those two LORs.
Some totals may not appear to add up because the total is rounded after adding up the raw values.
If reported, measurement uncertainty follow the ± sign after the analytical result and is expressed as the expanded uncertainty calculated using a
coverage factor of 2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%, unless stated otherwise in the comments section of this report.
Results reported for samples tested under test methods with codes starting with ARS -SOP, radionuclide or gross radioactivity concentrations are
expressed in becquerel (Bq) per unit of mass or volume or per wipe as stated on the report. Becquerel is the SI unit for activity and equals one
nuclear transformation per second.
Note that in terms of units of radioactivity:
a. 1 Bq is equivalent to 27 pCi
b. 37 MBq is equivalent to 1 mCi
For results reported for samples tested under test methods with codes starting with ARS -SOP, less than (<) values indicate the detection limit for
each radionuclide or parameter for the measurement system used. The respective detection limits have been calculated in accordance with ISO
11929.
defined therein.
This report must not be reproduced, except in full.
27/02/2017 Page 13 of 13
STATEMENT OF QA/QC SE162232 R0
PERFORMANCE

PYRMONT NSW 2009

COMMENTS
All the laboratory data for each environmental matrix was compared to SGS' stated Data Quality Objectives (DQO). Comments
arising from the comparison were made and are reported below.
The data relating to sampling was taken from the Chain of Custody document and was supplied by the Client.
This QA/QC Statement must be read in conjunction with the referenced Analytical Report.
The Statement and the Analytical Report must not be reproduced except in full.
All Data Quality Objectives were met (within the SGS Alexandria Environmental laboratory).
SAMPLE SUMMARY

Samples received in correct containers Yes Sample counts by matrix 7 Water

27/2/2017 Page 1 of 14

BH105W SE162232.001 LB119296 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 21 Mar 2017 24 Feb 2017 21 Mar 2017 24 Feb 2017
GWQD1 SE162232.004 LB119296 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 21 Mar 2017 24 Feb 2017 21 Mar 2017 24 Feb 2017
GWQR1 SE162232.005 LB119296 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 21 Mar 2017 24 Feb 2017 21 Mar 2017 24 Feb 2017
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

BH105W SE162232.001 LB119209 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 28 Feb 2017 23 Feb 2017 04 Apr 2017 27 Feb 2017
GWQD1 SE162232.004 LB119209 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 28 Feb 2017 23 Feb 2017 04 Apr 2017 27 Feb 2017
GWQR1 SE162232.005 LB119209 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 28 Feb 2017 23 Feb 2017 04 Apr 2017 27 Feb 2017
Total Phenolics in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN289


BH105W SE162232.001 LB119195 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 20 Aug 2017 22 Feb 2017 20 Aug 2017 24 Feb 2017
GWQD1 SE162232.004 LB119195 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 20 Aug 2017 22 Feb 2017 20 Aug 2017 24 Feb 2017
GWQR1 SE162232.005 LB119195 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 20 Aug 2017 22 Feb 2017 20 Aug 2017 24 Feb 2017


GWTS1 SE162232.006 LB119188 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 28 Feb 2017 22 Feb 2017 03 Apr 2017 23 Feb 2017
GWTB1 SE162232.007 LB119188 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 28 Feb 2017 22 Feb 2017 03 Apr 2017 23 Feb 2017

GWTS1 SE162232.006 LB119188 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 28 Feb 2017 22 Feb 2017 03 Apr 2017 23 Feb 2017
GWTB1 SE162232.007 LB119188 21 Feb 2017 21 Feb 2017 28 Feb 2017 22 Feb 2017 03 Apr 2017 23 Feb 2017
27/2/2017 Page 2 of 14

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 48
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 46
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 42
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 60
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 62
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 62
d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 46
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 42
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 42

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 120
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 128
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 127
GWQD1 SE162232.004 % 40 - 130% 111
GWQR1 SE162232.005 % 40 - 130% 109
GWTS1 SE162232.006 % 40 - 130% 103
GWTB1 SE162232.007 % 40 - 130% 120
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 92
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 98
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 102
GWQD1 SE162232.004 % 40 - 130% 117
GWQR1 SE162232.005 % 40 - 130% 114
GWTS1 SE162232.006 % 40 - 130% 116
GWTB1 SE162232.007 % 40 - 130% 121
d8-toluene (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 100
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 107
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 106
GWQD1 SE162232.004 % 40 - 130% 112
GWQR1 SE162232.005 % 40 - 130% 111
GWTS1 SE162232.006 % 40 - 130% 112
GWTB1 SE162232.007 % 40 - 130% 115
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 79
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 84
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 89
GWQD1 SE162232.004 % 40 - 130% 116
GWQR1 SE162232.005 % 40 - 130% 115
GWTS1 SE162232.006 % 40 - 130% 109
GWTB1 SE162232.007 % 40 - 130% 117

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 110
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 116
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 110
GWQD1 SE162232.004 % 40 - 130% 111
GWQR1 SE162232.005 % 40 - 130% 109
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 60 - 130% 103
BH117W SE162232.002 % 60 - 130% 110
BH120W SE162232.003 % 60 - 130% 115
GWQD1 SE162232.004 % 60 - 130% 117
GWQR1 SE162232.005 % 60 - 130% 114
d8-toluene (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 96
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 101
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 107
GWQD1 SE162232.004 % 40 - 130% 112
GWQR1 SE162232.005 % 40 - 130% 111
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) BH105W SE162232.001 % 40 - 130% 99
BH117W SE162232.002 % 40 - 130% 106
BH120W SE162232.003 % 40 - 130% 111
GWQD1 SE162232.004 % 40 - 130% 116
27/2/2017 Page 3 of 14
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433

Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) GWQR1 SE162232.005 % 40 - 130% 115
27/2/2017 Page 4 of 14

LB119296.001 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001

LB119209.001 Naphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
1-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Fluorene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Chrysene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

LB119208.001 Total Phenols mg/L 0.01 <0.01

LB119195.001 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 <1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 <1
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5

LB119209.001 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200

LB119188.001 Fumigants 2,2-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,2-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
cis-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
trans-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Halogenated Aliphatics Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) µg/L 5 <5
Chloromethane µg/L 5 <5
Vinyl chloride (Chloroethene) µg/L 0.3 <0.3
Bromomethane µg/L 10 <10
Chloroethane µg/L 5 <5
Trichlorofluoromethane µg/L 1 <1
Iodomethane µg/L 5 <5
27/2/2017 Page 5 of 14

LB119188.001 Halogenated Aliphatics 1,1-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) µg/L 5 <5
Allyl chloride µg/L 2 <2
trans-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,1-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
cis-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Bromochloromethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,2-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,1,1-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,1-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Carbon tetrachloride µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Dibromomethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene,TCE) µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,1,2-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,3-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethylene,PCE) µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 <1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,2,3-trichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 <1
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Hexachlorobutadiene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Halogenated Aromatics Chlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Bromobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
2-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
4-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,3-dichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Monocyclic Aromatic Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Hydrocarbons Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Styrene (Vinyl benzene) µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) µg/L 0.5 <0.5
n-propylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
tert-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
sec-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
p-isopropyltoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
n-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Nitrogenous Compounds Acrylonitrile µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Oxygenated Compounds Acetone (2-propanone) µg/L 10 <10
MtBE (Methyl-tert-butyl ether) µg/L 2 <1
Vinyl acetate µg/L 10 <10
MEK (2-butanone) µg/L 10 <10
MIBK (4-methyl-2-pentanone) µg/L 5 <5
2-hexanone (MBK) µg/L 5 <5
Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Sulphonated Carbon disulfide µg/L 2 <2
Compounds
Trihalomethanes Chloroform (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Bromodichloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5
27/2/2017 Page 6 of 14

LB119188.001 Trihalomethanes Dibromochloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Bromoform (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5

LB119188.001 TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40
27/2/2017 Page 7 of 14

SE162233.029 LB119296.012 Mercury µg/L 0.0001 -0.0102 0.0072 200 197

SE162009.002 LB119208.004 Total Phenols mg/L 0.01 0.02787 0.01217 200 0

SE162232.005 LB119195.011 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5 <5 200 0

SE162232.001 LB119188.013 Fumigants 2,2-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,2-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
cis-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
trans-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Halogenated Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) µg/L 5 <5 0 200 0
Aliphatics Chloromethane µg/L 5 <5 0 200 0
Vinyl chloride (Chloroethene) µg/L 0.3 <0.3 0 200 0
Bromomethane µg/L 10 <10 0 200 0
Chloroethane µg/L 5 <5 0 200 0
Trichlorofluoromethane µg/L 1 <1 0 200 0
Iodomethane µg/L 5 <5 0 200 0
1,1-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) µg/L 5 <5 0 200 0
Allyl chloride µg/L 2 <2 0 200 0
trans-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,1-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
cis-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Bromochloromethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,2-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,1,1-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,1-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Carbon tetrachloride µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Dibromomethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene,TCE) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,1,2-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,3-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethylene,PCE) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 <1 0 200 0
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,2,3-trichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 <1 0 200 0
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Hexachlorobutadiene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Halogenated Chlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Aromatics Bromobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
2-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
4-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
27/2/2017 Page 8 of 14

SE162232.001 LB119188.013 Halogenated 1,3-dichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Aromatics 1,4-dichlorobenzene µg/L 0.3 <0.3 0 200 0
1,2-dichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Monocyclic Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Aromatic Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1 0 200 0
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Styrene (Vinyl benzene) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
n-propylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
tert-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
sec-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
p-isopropyltoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
n-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Nitrogenous Acrylonitrile µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Compounds
Oxygenated Acetone (2-propanone) µg/L 10 <10 0 200 0
Compounds MtBE (Methyl-tert-butyl ether) µg/L 2 <2 0 200 0
Vinyl acetate µg/L 10 <10 0 200 0
MEK (2-butanone) µg/L 10 <10 0 200 0
MIBK (4-methyl-2-pentanone) µg/L 5 <5 0 200 0
2-hexanone (MBK) µg/L 5 <5 0 200 0
Polycyclic Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
VOCs
Sulphonated Carbon disulfide µg/L 2 <2 0 200 0
Compounds
Trihalomethan Chloroform (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
es Bromodichloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Dibromochloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Bromoform (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0

SE162232.001 LB119188.013 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50 0 200 0
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40 0 200 0
VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50 0 200 0
27/2/2017 Page 9 of 14

LB119209.002 Naphthalene µg/L 0.1 26 40 60 - 140 66
Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.1 32 40 60 - 140 80
Acenaphthene µg/L 0.1 30 40 60 - 140 75
Phenanthrene µg/L 0.1 32 40 60 - 140 80
Anthracene µg/L 0.1 37 40 60 - 140 93
Fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 39 40 60 - 140 99
Pyrene µg/L 0.1 44 40 60 - 140 111
Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.1 34 40 60 - 140 84
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 80
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 82
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.5 0.5 40 - 130 102

LB119208.002 Total Phenols mg/L 0.01 0.24 0.25 80 - 120 94

LB119195.002 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 101
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 20 80 - 120 100
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 103
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 103
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 105
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 20 20 80 - 120 101

LB119209.002 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 950 1200 60 - 140 79
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 1100 1200 60 - 140 91
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 1300 1200 60 - 140 105
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 1000 1200 60 - 140 85
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 1200 1200 60 - 140 100
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 670 600 60 - 140 111

LB119188.002 Halogenated 1,1-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 50 45.45 60 - 140 109
Aliphatics 1,2-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 50 45.45 60 - 140 110
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene,TCE) µg/L 0.5 49 45.45 60 - 140 109
Halogenated Chlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 50 45.45 60 - 140 109
Aromatics
Monocyclic Benzene µg/L 0.5 50 45.45 60 - 140 109
Aromatic Toluene µg/L 0.5 50 45.45 60 - 140 109
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 50 45.45 60 - 140 110
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 100 90.9 60 - 140 110
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 50 45.45 60 - 140 109
Trihalomethan Chloroform (THM) µg/L 0.5 50 45.45 60 - 140 109
es
LB119188.002 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 930 946.63 60 - 140 99
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 760 818.71 60 - 140 93
VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 640 639.67 60 - 140 100
27/2/2017 Page 10 of 14

SE162228.005 LB119296.004 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 0.0083 <0.0001 0.008 104

SE162009.002 LB119208.009 Total Phenols mg/L 0.01 0.02787 0.25 89

SE162232.003 LB119188.014 Fumigants 2,2-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
cis-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
trans-1,3-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Halogenated Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) µg/L 5 <5 - -
Aliphatics Chloromethane µg/L 5 <5 - -
Vinyl chloride (Chloroethene) µg/L 0.3 <0.3 - -
Bromomethane µg/L 10 <10 - -
Chloroethane µg/L 5 <5 - -
Trichlorofluoromethane µg/L 1 <1 - -
Iodomethane µg/L 5 <5 - -
1,1-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 94
Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) µg/L 5 <5 - -
Allyl chloride µg/L 2 <2 - -
trans-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,1-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
cis-1,2-dichloroethene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Bromochloromethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2-dichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 106
1,1,1-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,1-dichloropropene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Carbon tetrachloride µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Dibromomethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene,TCE) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 101
1,1,2-trichloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,3-dichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethylene,PCE) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 <1 - -
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2,3-trichloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene µg/L 1 <1 - -
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Hexachlorobutadiene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Halogenated Chlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 98
Aromatics Bromobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
2-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
4-chlorotoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,3-dichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Monocyclic Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 91
Aromatic Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 108
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 104
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1 90.9 101
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 103
27/2/2017 Page 11 of 14

SE162232.003 LB119188.014 Monocyclic Styrene (Vinyl benzene) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Aromatic Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
n-propylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
tert-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
sec-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
p-isopropyltoluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
n-butylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Nitrogenous Acrylonitrile µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Compounds
Oxygenated Acetone (2-propanone) µg/L 10 <10 - -
Compounds MtBE (Methyl-tert-butyl ether) µg/L 2 <2 - -
Vinyl acetate µg/L 10 <10 - -
MEK (2-butanone) µg/L 10 <10 - -
MIBK (4-methyl-2-pentanone) µg/L 5 <5 - -
2-hexanone (MBK) µg/L 5 <5 - -
Polycyclic Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
VOCs
Sulphonated Carbon disulfide µg/L 2 <2 - -
Compounds
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.4 - 83
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.1 - 104
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.3 - 103
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 6.3 - 109
Trihalometha Chloroform (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 45.45 92
nes Bromodichloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Dibromochloromethane (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Bromoform (THM) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -

SE162232.004 LB119188.014 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50 946.63 85
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40 818.71 82
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.8 - 107
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.9 - 111
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.6 - 106
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.5 - 104
VPH F Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.5 <0.5 - -
Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50 639.67 88
27/2/2017 Page 12 of 14
MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES SE162232 R0
Matrix spike duplicates are calculated as Relative Percent Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The original result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike. The Duplicate result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike duplicate.
No matrix spike duplicates were required for this job.
27/2/2017 Page 13 of 14
QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QA /QC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here :
http://www.sgs.com.au/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/ Technical Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022 QA QC Plan.pdf
* NATA accreditation does not cover tthe performance of this service .

- Sample not analysed for this analyte.
IS Insufficient sample for analysis.

LNR Sample listed, but not received.
LOR Limit of reporting.
QFH QC result is above the upper tolerance.
QFL QC result is below the lower tolerance.
① At least 2 of 3 surrogates are within acceptance criteria.

② RPD failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
③ Results less than 5 times LOR preclude acceptance criteria for RPD.
④ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to matrix interference.
⑤ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to the presence of significant concentration of analyte (i.e. the
concentration of analyte exceeds the spike level).
⑥ LOR was raised due to sample matrix interference.
⑦ LOR was raised due to dilution of significantly high concentration of analyte in sample.
⑧ Reanalysis of sample in duplicate confirmed sample heterogeneity and inconsistency of results.
⑨ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
⑩ LOR was raised due to high conductivity of the sample (required dilution).
† Refer to Analytical Report comments for further information.
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service, available on request and accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/terms-and-conditions. The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined
therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained herein reflects the Company 's findings at the time of its intervention only and
within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a
transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
27/2/2017 Page 14 of 14
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 162326
Client:
EI Australia
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
Pyrmont
NSW 2009
Attention: Joel Heininger
Sample log in details:

Your Reference: E23061, 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde
No. of samples: 1 Water
Date samples received / completed instructions received 22/02/17 / 22/02/17
Analysis Details:
Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.
Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.
Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.
Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.
Report Details:
Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 1/03/17 / 1/03/17
Date of Preliminary Report: Not Issued
NATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.
Results Approved By:

Revision No: R 00
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Water
Our Reference: UNITS 162326-1
Your Reference ------------ GWQT1
-
Date Sampled ------------ 21/02/2017
Type of sample Water
Date extracted - 22/02/2017

Date analysed - 23/02/2017
TRHC 6 - C 9 µg/L <10
TRHC 6 - C 10 µg/L <10
TRHC 6 - C 10 less BTEX µg/L <10
(F1)
Benzene µg/L <1
Toluene µg/L <1
Ethylbenzene µg/L <1
m+p-xylene µg/L <2
o-xylene µg/L <1
Naphthalene µg/L <1
Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane % 104
Surrogate toluene-d8 % 96
Surrogate 4-BFB % 98

Revision No: R 00
svTRH (C10-C40) in Water

-
Date Sampled ------------ 21/02/2017
Date extracted - 23/02/2017

TRHC 10 - C 14 µg/L <50
TRHC 15 - C 28 µg/L <100
TRHC 29 - C 36 µg/L <100
TRH >C10 - C 16 µg/L <50
TRH >C10 - C 16 less µg/L <50
Naphthalene (F2)
TRH >C16 - C 34 µg/L <100
TRH >C34 - C 40 µg/L <100
Surrogate o-Terphenyl % 92

Revision No: R 00
Metals in Water - Dissolved

-
Date Sampled ------------ 21/02/2017
Date digested - 23/02/2017

Arsenic - Dissolved mg/L <0.05
Cadmium - Dissolved mg/L <0.01
Chromium - Dissolved mg/L <0.01
Copper - Dissolved mg/L 0.02
Lead - Dissolved mg/L <0.03
Mercury - Dissolved mg/L <0.0005
Nickel - Dissolved mg/L 0.1
Zinc - Dissolved mg/L 0.8

Revision No: R 00
Method ID Methodology Summary

Org-013 Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS.
GC-FID.
Metals-020 Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.
Metals-021 Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.

Revision No: R 00
Sm# Recovery
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Water
Date extracted - 22/02/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 22/02/2017

017
Date analysed - 23/02/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 23/02/2017
017
TRHC 6 - C 9 µg/L 10 Org-016 <10 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 100%
Benzene µg/L 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 99%
Toluene µg/L 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 98%
Ethylbenzene µg/L 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 99%
m+p-xylene µg/L 2 Org-016 <2 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 101%
o-xylene µg/L 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 103%
Naphthalene µg/L 1 Org-013 <1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]
Surrogate % Org-016 103 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 102%
Dibromofluoromethane
Surrogate toluene-d8 % Org-016 95 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 99%
Surrogate 4-BFB % Org-016 96 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 107%
Sm# Recovery
svTRH (C10-C40) in Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Water
Date extracted - 23/02/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 23/02/2017

017
017
TRH >C10 - C 16 µg/L 50 Org-003 <50 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 128%
Surrogate o-Terphenyl % Org-003 84 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 106%
Sm# Recovery
Metals in Water - Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Dissolved
Date digested - 23/02/2 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 23/02/2017

017
017
Arsenic - Dissolved mg/L 0.05 Metals-020 <0.05 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 111%
Cadmium - Dissolved mg/L 0.01 Metals-020 <0.01 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 120%
Chromium - Dissolved mg/L 0.01 Metals-020 <0.01 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 115%
Copper - Dissolved mg/L 0.01 Metals-020 <0.01 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 116%
Lead - Dissolved mg/L 0.03 Metals-020 <0.03 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 114%
Mercury - Dissolved mg/L 0.0005 Metals-021 <0.000 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 96%
5
Nickel - Dissolved mg/L 0.02 Metals-020 <0.02 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 114%

Revision No: R 00
Sm# Recovery
Metals in Water - Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Dissolved
Zinc - Dissolved mg/L 0.02 Metals-020 <0.02 [NT] [NT] LCS-W1 117%

Revision No: R 00
Report Comments:
Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this job
Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job
INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not tested
NR: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required
<: Less than >: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample

Revision No: R 00
Quality Control Definitions

Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,
glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples.
Duplicate : This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample
selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.
Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix
spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist.
LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank
sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.
Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds
which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.
Laboratory Acceptance Criteria

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency
to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix
spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.
Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted
during sample extraction.
Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.
For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.
Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140%
for organics (+/-50% surrogates) and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics
and speciated phenols is acceptable.
In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples
respectively, the sample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.
When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs),
the analysis has proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse
within the THT or as soon as practicable.
Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity
of the analysis where recommended technical holding times may have been breached.
Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.

Revision No: R 00
APPENDIX F
QA/QC Assessment
F1 QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM
F1.1 INTRODUCTION
For the purpose of assessing the quality of data presented in this Contaminant Delineation
Report, EI collected field QC samples for analysis. The primary laboratory, SGS Australia Pty Ltd
(SGS) and secondary laboratory, Envirolab Services Pty Ltd (Envirolab) also prepared and
analysed internal QC samples. Details of the field and laboratory QC samples, with the allowable
data acceptance ranges are presented in Table F-1.
Table F-1 Sampling Data Quality Indicators
QA/QC Measures Data Quality Indicators
Precision – A quantitative Data precision would be assessed by reviewing the performance of blind field
measure of the variability (or duplicate sample sets, through calculation of relative percentage differences
reproducibility) of data (RPD). Data precision would be deemed acceptable if RPDs are found to be
less than 30%. RPDs that exceed this range may be considered acceptable
where:
 Results are less than 10 times the limits of reporting (LOR);
 Results are less than 20 times the LOR and the RPD is less than 50%; or
 Heterogeneous materials or volatile compounds are encountered.
Accuracy – A quantitative Data accuracy would be assessed through the analysis of:
measure of the closeness of  Method blanks, which are analysed for the analytes targeted in the primary
reported data to the “true” value samples;
 Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate sample sets;
 Laboratory control samples; and
 Calibration of instruments against known standards.
Representativeness – The To ensure the data produced by the laboratory is representative of conditions
confidence (expressed encountered in the field, the laboratory would carry out the following:
qualitatively) that data are  Blank samples will be run in parallel with field samples to confirm there are
representative of each medium no unacceptable instances of laboratory artefacts;
present onsite
 Review of relative percentage differences (RPD) values for field and
laboratory duplicates to provide an indication that the samples are
generally homogeneous, with no unacceptable instances of significant
sample matrix heterogeneities; and
 The appropriateness of collection methodologies, handling, storage and
preservation techniques will be assessed to ensure/confirm there was
minimal opportunity for sample interference or degradation (i.e. volatile loss
during transport due to incorrect preservation / transport methods).
Completeness – A measure of Analytical data sets acquired during the assessment will be evaluated as
the amount of useable data from complete, upon confirmation that:
a data collection activity  Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for sampling protocols were
adhered to; and
 Copies of all COC documentation are presented, reviewed and found to be
properly completed.
It can therefore be considered whether the proportion of “useable data”
generated in the data collection activities is sufficient for the purposes of the
land use assessment.
QA/QC Measures Data Quality Indicators
Comparability – The Given that a reported data set can comprise several data sets from separate
confidence (expressed sampling episodes, issues of comparability between data sets are reduced
qualitatively) that data may be through adherence to SOPs and regulator-endorsed or published guidelines
considered to be equivalent for and standards on each data gathering activity.
each sampling and analytical In addition the data will be collected by experienced samplers and NATA-
event accredited laboratory methodologies will be employed in all laboratory testing
programs.
F1.2 CALCULATION OF RELATIVE PERCENTAGE DIFFERENCE (RPD)

The RPD values were calculated using the following equation:
|𝐶𝑂 − 𝐶𝑅 |
𝑅𝑃𝐷 = × 100
[(𝐶𝑂 + 𝐶𝑅 )⁄2]
Where:
CO = Concentration obtained for the primary sample; and
CR = Concentration obtained for the blind replicate or split duplicate sample.
F2 FIELD QA/QC DATA EVALUATION

The field quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) soil and groundwater samples collected
during the investigations were as follows:
 Blind field duplicates;
 Inter-laboratory duplicates;
 Trip blanks;
 Trip spikes; and
 Rinsate blanks.
Analytical results for tested soil and groundwater QA/QC samples, including calculated RPD
values between primary and duplicate samples, are presented in Table F-2 and Table F-3,
respectively.
F2.1 SOIL INVESTIGATION & SOIL VALIDATION

F2.1.1 Blind Field Duplicates
Sample QD1 was collected from the primary sample BH120W_0.5-0.6 on 8 February 2017.
Sample QD2 was collected from the primary sample BH121_0.5-0.6 on 9 February 2017.
The preparation of the BFD samples involved the collection of a bulk quantity of soil from the
same sampling point without mixing, before dividing the material into identical sampling vessels.
The duplicate samples were then presented blind to the primary laboratory (SGS) to avoid any
potential analytical bias. BFD soil samples were analysed for TRHs, BTEX, and selected heavy
metals. Calculated RPD values were found to be within the Data Acceptance Criteria (Appendix
G, Table J1), except for Mercury (66.67%). The reported groundwater concentrations mercury
was within ten times the laboratory LOR and was deemed to be acceptable.
F2.1.2 Inter-Laboratory Duplicate

Sample QT1 was collected from the primary sample BH120W_0.5-0.6 on 8 February 2017.
Sample QT2 was collected from the primary sample BH121_0.5-0.6 on 9 February 2017.
The triplicate samples were then presented blind to the secondary laboratory (Envirolab) to avoid
any potential analytical bias. BFD soil samples were analysed for TRHs, BTEX, and selected
heavy metals. Calculated RPD values were found to be within the Data Acceptance Criteria.
F2.1.3 Trip Blank

Three trip blank (QTB1, QTB2 and QTB3) samples were prepared and analysed by the primary
laboratory for BTEX. Analytical results for this sample were below the laboratory LOR, indicating
that ideal sample transport and handling conditions were achieved.
F2.1.4 Trip Spike

Two trip spike (QTS2 and QTS3) samples were submitted to the primary laboratory for BTEX
analysis, the results for which were reported within the RPD acceptance levels for trip spike
recovery. It was therefore concluded that satisfactory sample transport and handling conditions
were achieved.
F2.1.5 Rinsate Blank

Three rinsate blank (QR1, QR2 and QR3) samples were submitted to the primary laboratory for
TRH, BTEX, and selected heavy metal analysis, the results for which were reported below
laboratory LOR except for QR1 with concentrations of zinc equal to 100 mg/kg. This doesn’t
disregard the results received as it doesn’t exceed investigation criteria levels.
F2.2 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION

F2.2.1 Blind Field Duplicates
Sample GWQD1 was collected from the primary sample BH105W on 21 February 2017.
The preparation of BFD samples involved the decanting of the groundwater collected from the
respective monitoring well into two separate groups of appropriately labelled sampling
containers. Volumes were split equally between the groups of sampling bottles such that the
sample contained in each individual bottle, contained a similar proportion of each water volume.
Sample mixing did not occur prior to decanting, in order to preserve the concentrations of
volatiles potentially present within the sample. The duplicate sample was then presented blind to
the primary laboratory (SGS) to avoid any potential analytical bias. The BFDs were analysed for
TRHs, BTEX, selected heavy metals, PAHs and VOCs. The RPD values calculated for all the
analytes tested were found to be within the Data Acceptance Criteria (DAC), except for Mercury
(191.67%). Even though it exceeds the reported groundwater concentrations mercury was
greater than the ten times the laboratory LOR, EI still has recommended additional groundwater
monitoring.
F2.2.2 Inter-Laboratory Duplicate

Sample GWQT1 was collected from the primary sample BH105W on 21 February 2017.
The preparation of the ILD sample was identical to the BFD sample, as described above,
however, was not analysed at the Inter-Laboratory.
F2.2.3 Trip Blanks

One trip blank (GWQTB1) samples was prepared by the primary laboratory, were analysed for
BTEX and VOCs by the primary laboratory during groundwater testing. TB results were reported
below the laboratory LOR, indicating that ideal sample transport and handling conditions were
achieved.
F2.2.4 Trip Spikes

One trip spike (GWQTS1) sample was submitted to the primary laboratory for BTEX analysis, the
results for which were all reported within the RPD acceptance levels for trip spike recovery. It
was therefore concluded that satisfactory sample transport and handling conditions were
achieved.
F2.2.5 Rinsate Blanks

One rinsate blank (GWQR1) sample was submitted to the primary laboratory for TRH, BTEX,
and selected heavy metal analysis, the results for which were reported below laboratory LOR.
F3 LABORATORY QA/QC
F3.1 LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
To undertake all analytical testing, EI commissioned SGS as the primary laboratory and
Envirolab as the secondary laboratory. SGS and Envirolab, both established analytical
laboratories which operate in accordance with the guidelines set out in ISO/IEC Guide 25
“General requirements for the competence of calibration and testing laboratories”, conducted all
respective analyses using National Association Testing Authorities (NATA)-registered
procedures.
In relation to contingencies, should the pre-determined DQOs not be achieved, in accordance
with each laboratory’s QC policy (Appendix K), respective tests would be accordingly repeated.
Should the results again fall outside the DQOs, then sample heterogeneity may be assumed and
written comment will be provided to this effect on the final laboratory certificate. The laboratory
QA/QC reports are included in Appendix K.
F3.2 SAMPLE HOLDING TIMES

Sample holding times were within the laboratory DQOs, which were consistent with standard
environmental protocols as tabulated in Appendix K, Tables I1 and I2.
F3.3 TEST METHODS AND PRACTICAL QUANTITATION LIMITS (PQLS)

Practical Quantitation Limits for all tested parameters during the assessment of soils and
groundwater are presented in Appendix K, Tables I1 and I2.
F3.4 METHOD BLANKS

Concentrations of all parameters in method blanks during the assessment were below the
laboratory PQLs and were therefore within the DAC.
F3.5 LABORATORY DUPLICATE SAMPLES

The Laboratory Dulicate Samples (LDS) for the analysis batches showed calculated RPDs that
were within acceptable ranges and conformed to the DAC.
F3.6 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES

The Laboratory Control Samples for the analysis batches were within acceptable ranges and
conformed to the DAC.
F3.7 MATRIX SPIKES

All matrix spikes for the respective sample batches were within acceptable ranges and
conformed to the DAC, with the exception of zinc in soil due to matrix interference.
I3.8 SURROGATE
Recovery results for all surrogate samples conformed to the DAC.
F3.9 CONCLUDING REMARK

Based on the laboratory QA/QC results EI considers that although a small number of
discrepancies were identified, which in could be attributed to the non-homogenous nature of the
submitted samples, the data generally confirms that the analytical results for the various phases
of laboratory testing were valid and useable for interpretation purposes.
Report No. E23061 AA_Rev0
Table I1 - Summary of Soil RPD Data
TRH BTEX Heavy Metals
Chromium (Total)
identification
Description
F3 (>C16 - C34)
F4 (>C34 - C40)
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
Sample
Cadmium
Benzene
Mercury
Toluene
Arsenic
Copper
Nickel
Lead
F2**
Zinc
F1*
Intra-laboratory Duplicate - Soil Investigation
BH120W_0.5-0.6 FILL - Silty CLAY <25 <25 95 <120 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 9 0.5 29 20 63 <0.05 5.0 54
QD1 BFD <25 <25 <90 <120 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 9 0.4 24 18 61 <0.05 5 57
RPD 0.00 0.00 5.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.22 18.87 10.53 3.23 0.00 7.69 5.41
BH121_0.5-0.6 FILL - Silty CLAY <25 <25 <90 <120 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 7 0.4 27 21 45 <0.05 4.7 33
QD2 BFD <25 <25 <90 <120 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 7 0.4 27 19 40 0.1 5 28
RPD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 11.76 66.67 6.19 16.39
Inter-laboratory Duplicate - Soil Investigation
BH120W_0.5-0.6 FILL - Gravelly SAND <25 <25 95 <120 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 9 0.5 29 20 63 <0.05 5.0 54
QT1 BFD <25 <50 <100 <100 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 8 <0.4 28 17 53 <0.1 6 41
RPD 0.00 NA 5.13 NA NA NA NA NA 11.76 22.22 3.51 16.22 17.24 NA 18.18 27.37
BH121_0.5-0.6 FILL - Silty CLAY <25 <25 <90 <120 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 7 0.4 27 21 45 <0.05 4.7 33
QT2 BFD <25 <50 <100 <100 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 5 <0.4 27 18 38 <0.1 5 23
RPD 0.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 33.33 0.00 0.00 15.38 16.87 NA 6.19 35.71
Trip Blank
QTB1 Water - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 - - - - - - - -
QTB2 Water - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 - - - - - - - -
QTB3 Soil - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 - - - - - - - -
Trip Spike
QTS2 Water - - - - [96%] [96%] [99%] NT - - - - - - - -
QTS3 Soil - - - - [95%] [93%] [95%] NT - - - - - - - -
Rinsate Blanks
QR1 De-ionised water <50 <60 <500 <500 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <1 100
QR2 De-ionised water <50 <60 <500 <500 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <1 <5
QR3 De-ionised water <50 <60 <500 <500 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <1 <5
NOTE: All results are reported in mg/kg (soil) or µg/L (water)
66.67 RPD calculated by halving detection limit exceeds 30-50% range referenced from AS4482.1 (2005)
52.87 RPD exceeds 30-50% range referenced from AS4482.1 (2005)
Table I2 - Summary of Groundwater RPD Data
TRH BTEX Heavy Metals
Chromium (Total)
identification
Description
F3 (>C16 - C34)
F4 (>C34 - C40)
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
Sample
Cadmium
Benzene
Toluene
Mercury
Arsenic
Copper
Nickel
Lead
F2**
Zinc
F1*
Intra-laboratory Duplicate - Groundwater Investigation
BH105W Groundwater <50 <60 <500 <500 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 <1 0.8 <1 13 <1 <0.1 90 750
GWQD1 BFD <50 <60 <500 <500 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 <1 0.8 <1 12 <1 4.7 95 760
RPD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 191.67 5.41 1.32
Inter-laboratory Duplicate - Groundwater Investigation
BH1M Groundwater <50 <60 <500 <500 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 <1 0.8 <1 13 <1 <0.1 90 750
QT1 ILD NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT
RPD NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Trip Blank
GWQTB1 De-ionised water - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 - - - - - - - -
Trip Spikes
GWQTS1 Groundwater - - - - [78%] [86%] [77%] NT - - - - - - - -
Rinsate Blanks
GWQR1 De-ionised water <50 <60 <500 <500 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <1 <5
NOTE: All results are reported in mg/kg (soil) or µg/L (water)
66.67 RPD calculated by halving detection limit exceeds 30-50% range referenced from AS4482.1 (2005)
66.67 RPD exceeds 30-50% range referenced from AS4482.1 (2005)
APPENDIX G
Laboratory QA/AC Policies and DQOs
Table QC1 - Containers, Preservation Requirements and Holding Times - Soil
Maximum
Parameter Container Preservation
Holding Time
Acid digestible metals and
Glass with
metalloids - Total and TCLP Nil 6 months
Teflon Lid
(As,Cd.,Cu,Cr,Ni,Pb,Zn)
Glass with
Mercury Nil 28 days
Teflon Lid
Glass with 4oC, zero
TPH / BTEX / VOC / SVOC / CHC 14 days
Teflon Lid headspace
Glass with
PAHs (total and TCLP) 4 oC 1 14 days
Teflon Lid
Glass with
Phenols 4 oC 1 14 days
Teflon Lid
Glass with
OCPs, OPPs and total PCBs 4 oC 1 14 days
Teflon Lid
Sealed Plastic
Asbestos Nil N/A
Bag
Table QC2 - Containers, Preservation Requirements and Holding Times - Water
Container Maximum
Parameter Preservation
Volume (mL) Holding Time
Field filtration 0.45Pm
Heavy Metals 125mL Plastic 6 months
HNO3 / 4oC
125mL Amber
Cyanide pH > 12 NaOH / 4oC 6 months
Glass
TPH (C6-C9) / BTEX / VOCs SVOCs
4 x 43mL Glass HCl / 4oC 1 14 days
/ CHCs
TPH (C10-C36) / PAH / Phenolics

3 x 1L Amber Glass None / 4oC 1 28 days
OCP / OPP / TDS / pH
1
Notes: = Extraction within 14 days, Analysis within 40 days.
Table QC3 - Analytical Parameters, PQLs and Methods - Soil
Parameter Unit PQL Method Reference
Metals in Soil
Arsenic - As1 mg / kg 1 USEPA 200.7
Cadmium - Cd1 mg / kg 0.5 USEPA 200.7
Chromium - Cr1 mg / kg 1 USEPA 200.7
Copper - Cu1 mg / kg 1 USEPA 200.7
Lead - Pb1 mg / kg 1 USEPA 200.7
Mercury - Hg2 mg / kg 0.1 USEPA 7471A
Nickel - Ni1 mg / kg 1 USEPA 200.7
Zinc - Zn1 mg / kg 1 USEPA 200.7
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPHs) in Soil
C6-C9 fraction mg / kg 25 USEPA 8260
BTEX in Soil
Benzene mg / kg 1 USEPA 8260
Toluene mg / kg 1 USEPA 8260
Ethylbenzene mg / kg 1 USEPA 8260
m & p Xylene mg / kg 2 USEPA 8260
o- Xylene mg / kg 1 USEPA 8260
Other Organic Contaminants in Soil
PAHs mg / kg 0.05-0.2 USEPA 8270
CHCs mg / kg 1 USEPA 8260
VOCs mg / kg 1 USEPA 8260
SVOCs mg / kg 1 USEPA 8260
OCPs mg / kg 0.1 USEPA 8140, 8080
OPPs mg / kg 0.1 USEPA 8140, 8080
PCBs mg / kg 0.1 USEPA 8080
Phenolics mg / kg 5 APHA 5530
Asbestos
Presence /
Asbestos mg / kg AS4964-2004
Absence
Notes:
1. Acid Soluble Metals by ICP-AES
2. Total Recoverable Mercury
Table QC4 - Analytical Parameters, PQLs and Methods - Groundwater
Parameter Unit PQL Method Parameter Unit PQL Method
Heavy Metals Chlorinated Hydrocarbons (CHCs)
Antimony - Sb Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 1,2-dichlorobenzene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8260B
Arsenic - As Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 1,3-dichlorobenzene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8260B
Beryllium - Be Pg/L 0.5 USEPA 200.8 1,4-dichlorobenzene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8260B
Cadmium - Cd Pg/L 0.1 USEPA 200.8 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8260B
Chromium - Cr Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8260B
Cobalt - Co Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 Hexachlorobutadeine Pg/L 1 USEPA 8260B
Copper - Cu Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 1,1,2-trichloroethane Pg/L 1 USEPA 8260B
Lead - Pb Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 Hexachloroethane Pg/L 10 USEPA 8270D
Mercury - Hg Pg/L 0.5 USEPA 7471A Other CHCs Pg/L 1 USEPA 8260B
Molybdenum - Mo Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Nickel - Ni Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 Aniline Pg/L 10 USEPA 8260B
Selenium - Se Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 2,4-dichloroaniline Pg/L 10 USEPA 8260B
Silver - Ag Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 3,4-dichloroaniline Pg/L 10 USEPA 8260B
Tin (inorg.) - Sn Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 Nitrobenzene Pg/L 50 USEPA 8260B
Nickel - Ni Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 2,4-dinitrotoluene Pg/L 50 USEPA 8260B
Zinc - Zn Pg/L 1 USEPA 200.8 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene Pg/L 50 USEPA 8260B
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPHs) Phenolic Compounds
USEPA 8220A /
C6-C9 fraction Pg/L 10 Phenol Pg/L 10 USEPA 8041
8000
C10-C14 fraction Pg/L 50 USEPA 8000 2-chlorophenol Pg/L 10 USEPA 8041
C15-C28 fraction Pg/L 100 USEPA 8000 4-chlorophenol Pg/L 10 USEPA 8041
C29-C36 fraction Pg/L 100 USEPA 8000 2, 4-dichlorophenol Pg/L 10 USEPA 8041
BTEX 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Pg/L 10 USEPA 8041
Benzene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8220A 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol Pg/L 10 USEPA 8041
Toluene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8220A Pentachlorophenol Pg/L 10 USEPA 8041
Ethylbenzene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8220A 2,4-dinitrophenol Pg/L 10 USEPA 8041
m- & p-Xylene Pg/L 2 USEPA 8220A Miscellaneous Parameters
o-Xylene Pg/L 1 USEPA 8220A Total Cyanide Pg/L 5 APHA 4500C&E-CN
Polyciclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Fluoride Pg/L 10 APHA 4500 F-C
PAHs Pg/L 0.1 USEPA 8270 Salinity (TDS) mg/L 1 APHA 2510
Benzo(a)pyrene Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8270 pH units 0.1 APHA 4500H+
OrganoChlorine Pesticides (OCPs) OrganoPhosphate Pesticides (OPPs)
Aldrin Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Azinphos Methyl Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8141
Chlordane Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Chloropyrifos Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8141
DDT Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Diazinon Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8141
Dieldrin Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Dimethoate Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8141
Endosulfan Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Fenitrothion Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8141
Endrin Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Malathion Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8141
Heptachlor Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Parathion Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8141
Lindane Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Temephos Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8141
Toxaphene Pg/L 0.001 USEPA 8081 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Individual PCBs Pg/L 0.01 USEPA 8081
Table QC5 - QC Sample Data Acceptance Criteria
QC Sample Type Method of Assessment Acceptable Range
Field QC
Blind Duplicates and The assessment of split duplicate is undertaken by The acceptable range depends upon the levels
Split Samples calculating the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) of detected:
the duplicate concentration compared with the
primary sample concentration. The RPD is defined - 0-150% RPD (when the average
as: concentration is <5 times the
LOR/PQL)
| X1 - X2 |
RPD = 100 x ___________________ - 0-75% RPD (when the average
mean ( X1, X2) concentration is 5 to 10 times
the LOR/PQL)
Where: X 1 and X2 are the concentrations
- 0-50% RPD (when the average
of the primary and duplicate samples.
concentration is >10 times the
LOR/PQL)
Rinsate & Each blank is analysed as per the

Analytical Result <LOR/PQL
Trip Blanks original samples.
The Trip Spike is analysed after

Laboratory prepared returning from the field and the %
70 - 130%
Trip Spike recovery of the known spike is
calculated.
Laboratory QC
Laboratory Duplicates Assessment of Lab Duplicate RPD as per Blind Lab Duplicate RPD < 15% (Inorganics) Lab
Duplicates and Duplicate RPD < 30% (Organics) for sample results
Split Samples. > 10 LOR
Surrogates Assessment is undertaken by determining at least 2 SS recoveries to be within 70-130%

the percent recovery of the known surrogate spike subject to matrix effects (Organics)
(SS) or addition to the sample.
C-A 80-120% (Inorganics / Metals)

Matrix Spikes % Recovery = 100 x _______________ 60-140% (Organics)
Laboratory Control B 10-140% (SVOC and Speciated Phenols)
Samples
Where: A = Concentration of analyte determined If the result is outside the above ranges, the
in the original sample; result must be <3x Standard Deviation of the
B = Added Concentration; and Historical Mean (calculated over the past
C = Calculated Concentration. 12 months).
Sample Matrix Spike

Recovery RPD <30% (Inorganics & Organics)
Duplicates
CCV must be within ±15% (inorganics)

Calibration Check Standars Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV)
CCV must be within ±25% (inorganics)
Reagent, Method & Calibration Each blank is analysed as per the

Analytical Result <LOR/PQL
Check Blanks original samples.
Note: PQL - Laboratory Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) or the minimum detection limit for a particular analyte.
LOR = Limit of Reporting
QA/QC
AUSTRALIA PLAN
- ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - MANAGEMENT PLAN
QA QC PLAN
Approved: T. Pilbeam
SGS Environmental Services is accredited by NATA for Chemical Testing (Reg.No.2562) and Quality
System compliance to ISO/IEC 17025. The QC parameters contained within are designed to meet NEPM
1999 requirements.
Quality Control samples included in any analytical run are listed below.
Reagent/Analysis Blank Sample free reagents carried through the preparation/extraction/digestion

(BLK) procedure and analysed at the beginning of every sample batch analysis. A
reagent blank is prepared and analysed with every batch of samples plus with
Method Blank (MB) each new batch of solvent prior to use.
Sample Matrix Spike Sample replicates spiked with identical concentrations of target analyte(s). The
(MS) & Matrix Spike spiking occurs during the sample preparation and prior to the
Duplicate (MSD) extraction/digestion procedure. They are used to document the precision and
bias of a method in a given sample matrix. Where there is not enough sample
available to prepare a spiked sample, another known soil/sand or water may be
used. A duplicate spiked sample is analysed at least every 20 samples.
Surrogate Spike (SS) At least one but up to three surrogate compounds are added to all samples
requiring analysis for organics prior to extraction. Used to determine the
extraction efficiency. They are organic compounds which are similar to the
target analyte(s) in chemical composition and behaviour in the analytical
process, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Where
possible they are surrogate compounds recommended by the USEPA.
Control Matrix Spike To ensure spike recoveries can be determined for every batch of samples a
(CMS) control matrix is spiked with identical concentrations of target analyte(s) and
then analysed. These results allow recoveries to be determined in the event
that the matrix spikes are unusable (eg. matrix spikes performed on heavily
contaminated samples). These are analysed at least every 20 samples.
Internal Standard (IS) Added to all samples requiring analysis for organics (where relevant) after the
extraction process; the compounds serve to give a standard of retention time
and response, which is invariant from run-to-run with the instruments. Where
possible they are standard compounds recommended by the USEPA.
Lab Duplicates (D) A separate portion of a sample being analysed that is treated the same as the
other samples in the batch. One duplicate is processed at least every 10
samples.
Lab Control Prepared from a source independent of the calibration standards. At least one
Standards/Samples control standard is included in each run to confirm calibration validity.
(LCS) Thereafter they are analysed at least every one in 20 samples plus at the end of
each analytical run. This data is not reported.
Continuous Calibration A calibration check standard or CCV and blank are run after every 20 samples
Verification (CCV) or of an instrumental analysis run to assess analytical drift.
Calibration Check Calibration Standards are checked old versus new with a criteria of ±10%
Standard & Blank
8QFRQWUROOHGGRFXPHQWZKHQSULQWHG 5HI03$8>(19@484$4&3ODQGRFYHU3DJHRI

QA/QC
AUSTRALIA PLAN
QA QC PLAN
Quality Assurance Programs are listed below:
Statistical analysis of Quality control data is plotted on control charts using the APHA procedure with
Quality Control data warning and control limits at 2 and 3 standard deviations respectively. See also
(SQC) QMS Procedure “Statistical Quality Control”.
Certified Reference Certified Reference Materials and Standards are regularly analysed. These
Materials (CRM/SRM) materials/standards have certified reference values for various parameters.
Regular proficiency test samples are analysed by our laboratories. SGS

Environmental participates in a number of programs. Results and proficiency
Proficiency Testing
status are compiled and sent to participating laboratory post data interpretation.
Failure to comply with acceptable values result in further investigations.
SGS Environmental Services has schedules in the Quality Systems to

Inter-laboratory & Intra-
participate in Inter/Intra laboratory testing conducted internally and by other
laboratory Testing
parties.
Failure to meet the internal acceptance criteria will result in sample batch
repeats dependent upon investigation outcomes. For data to be accepted:
Inorganics (water samples)
• For all inorganic analytes the Reagent & Method Blanks must be less
than the LOR.
• The Calibration Check Standards or Continuous Calibration
+
Verification (CCV) must be within 15%.
• Control Standards must be 80-120% of the accepted value.
• The Calibration Check Blanks must be less than the LOR.
• Lab Duplicates RPD to be <15%*. Note: If client field duplicates do not
meet this criteria it may indicate heterogeneity and shall be noted on
the data reports for QC samples.
Data Acceptance Criteria • Sample (and if applicable Control) Matrix Spike Duplicate recovery
RPD to be <30%.
+
Unless otherwise specified in • Where CRMs are used, results to be within 2 standard deviations of
the method or method manual the expected value.
the following general criteria
Inorganics (soil samples)
apply to all inorganic tests.
• For all inorganic analytes the Reagent & Method Blanks must be less
All recoveries are to be than the LOR.
reported to 3 significant • The Calibration Check Standards or Continuous Calibration
figures. +
Verification (CCV) must be within 15%.
• Control Standards must be 80-120% of the accepted value.
• The Calibration Check Blanks must be less than the LOR.
• Lab duplicate RPD to be <30%* for sample results greater than 10
times LOR.
• Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD) recovery RPD to be
<30%. In the event that the matrix spike has been applied to samples
whose matrix or contamination is problematic to the method then
these acceptance criteria apply to the Control Matrix Spike (CMS/D).
• Where CRMs are used, results to be within ± 2 standard deviations of
the expected value.

QA/QC
AUSTRALIA PLAN
QA QC PLAN
Organics
• Volatile & extractable Reagent & Method Blanks must contain levels
less than or equal to LOR.
• The Calibration Check Standards or Continuous Calibration
+
Verification (CCV) must be within 25%. Some analytes may have
specific criteria.
• Control Standards (LCS/CMS) and Certified Reference Materials
(CRM) recoveries are to be within established control limits or as a
default 60-140% unless compound specific limits apply.
• Retention times are to vary by no more than 0.2 min.
Data Acceptance Criteria
• At least two of three routine level soil sample Surrogate Spike (SS)
recoveries are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not
Unless otherwise specified in been developed and within the established control limits for charted
the method or method manual surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as acceptance criterion. Any
the following general criteria recoveries outside these limits will have comment.
apply to all organic tests.
• Water sample Surrogates Spike (SS) recoveries are to be within 40-
All recoveries are to be 130%. The presence of emulsions, surfactants and particulates may
reported to 3 significant void this as an acceptance criterion. Any recoveries outside these
figures. limits will have comment.
• Lab Duplicates (D) must have a RPD <30%*.
• Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD) recovery RPD to be
<30%. In the event that the matrix spike has been applied to samples
whose matrix or contamination is problematic to the method then
these acceptance criteria apply to the Control Matrix Spike (CMS/D).
* O n l y i f r e s u l t s a r e a t l e a s t 1 0 t i m e s t h e L O R o t h e r wi s e n o a c c e p t a n c e c r i t e r i a f o r R P D ’ s a p p l y .
A p p l i c a t i o n o f m o r e s t r i n g e n t c r i t e r i a s h a l l b e a p p l i e d f o r c l e a n wa t e r s a m p l e f r o m wa t e r b o a r d s a n d a n y
o t h e r n o m i n a t e d c l i e n t c o n t r a c t s . N o m i n a l 1 0 xL O R c r i t e r i a a r e d r o p p e d t o 5 xL O R wh e r e s p e c i f i e d .

Matrix do not readily equate to definitive recovery due to inherent matrix interferences and thus do not
h a v e r e c o v e r y c o m p l i a n c e v a l u e s s e t . A s a g u i d e i n o r g a n i c r e c o v e r i e s s h o u l d b e b e t we e n 7 0 - 1 3 0 % a n d
for organics 60-130%
Batc h Str uc tur e Sum m ar y
An analytical batch is nominally considered as 20 samples or smaller. As a standard template the following
should be used as a guide according to the above Quality Control Types:
1 MB 16 UNK_DUP
2 STD1 17 MS
3 STD2 18 MS_DUP
4 STD3 19 UNK 11
5 LCS 20 UNK 12
6 BLK 21 UNK 13
7 UNK 1 22 UNK 14
8 UNK 2 23 UNK 15
9 UNK 3 24 UNK 16
10 UNK 4 25 UNK 17
11 UNK 5 26 UNK 18
12 UNK 6 27 UNK 19
13 UNK 7 28 UNK 20 (SS if applicable)
14 UNK 8 29 UNK_DUP
15 UNK 9 30 CCV
16 UNK 10 (SS if applicable) 31 CRM / SRM / CMS / LCS

APPENDIX H
95% UCL Calculation
A B C D E F G H I J K L
UCL Statistics for Uncensored Full Data Sets
1
2
User Selected Options
3
Date/Time of Computation 27/02/2017 5:30:42 PM
4
From File AA E23061_Table T1_Soil Analytical Results_a.xls
5
Full Precision OFF
6
Confidence Coefficient 95%
7
Number of Bootstrap Operations 2000
8
9
10
Nickel
11
12
General Statistics
13
Total Number of Observations 33 Number of Distinct Observations 31
14
Number of Missing Observations 0
15
Minimum 0.6 Mean 13.44
16
Maximum 57 Median 6.2
17
SD 16.2 Std. Error of Mean 2.819
18
Coefficient of Variation 1.205 Skewness 1.789
19
20
Normal GOF Test
21
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.692 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
22
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.931 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
23
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.298 Lilliefors GOF Test
24
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.154 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
25
Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
26
27
Assuming Normal Distribution
28
95% Normal UCL 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness)
29
95% Student's-t UCL 18.22 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 19.01
30
95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 18.36
31
32
Gamma GOF Test
33
A-D Test Statistic 1.544 Anderson-Darling Gamma GOF Test
34
5% A-D Critical Value 0.776 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
35
K-S Test Statistic 0.197 Kolmogrov-Smirnoff Gamma GOF Test
36
5% K-S Critical Value 0.158 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
37
Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
38
39
Gamma Statistics
40
k hat (MLE) 0.995 k star (bias corrected MLE) 0.925
41
Theta hat (MLE) 13.5 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 14.53
42
nu hat (MLE) 65.7 nu star (bias corrected) 61.06
43
MLE Mean (bias corrected) 13.44 MLE Sd (bias corrected) 13.97
44
Approximate Chi Square Value (0.05) 44.09
45
Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0419 Adjusted Chi Square Value 43.35
46
47
Assuming Gamma Distribution
48
95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50)) 18.61 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 18.93
49
50
Lognormal GOF Test
51
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.95 Shapiro Wilk Lognormal GOF Test
52
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.931 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
53
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.124 Lilliefors Lognormal GOF Test
54
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.154 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
55
Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
56
57
Lognormal Statistics
58
Minimum of Logged Data -0.511 Mean of logged Data 2.018
59
Maximum of Logged Data 4.043 SD of logged Data 1.091
60
61
Assuming Lognormal Distribution
62
95% H-UCL 22.29 90% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 22.16
63
95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 26.19 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 31.79
64
99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 42.77
65
66
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
67
Data appear to follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level
68
69
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCLs
70
95% CLT UCL 18.08 95% Jackknife UCL 18.22
71
95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 18.03 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 19.96
72
95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 18.28 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 18.13
73
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 19.45
74
90% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 21.9 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 25.73
75
97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 31.05 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 41.49
76
77
Suggested UCL to Use
78
95% H-UCL 22.29
79
80
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
81
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and Iaci (2002)
82
and Singh and Singh (2003). However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets.
83
For additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
84
85
ProUCL computes and outputs H-statistic based UCLs for historical reasons only.
86
H-statistic often results in unstable (both high and low) values of UCL95 as shown in examples in the Technical Guide.
87
It is therefore recommended to avoid the use of H-statistic based 95% UCLs.
88
Use of nonparametric methods are preferred to compute UCL95 for skewed data sets which do not follow a gamma distribution.
89
90
91
Zinc
92
93
General Statistics
94
95
96
97
Maximum 240 Median 33
98
99
100
101
Normal GOF Test
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
Gamma GOF Test
114
115
5% A-D Critical Value 0.759 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
116
117
5% K-S Critical Value 0.151 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
118
Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
119
120
Gamma Statistics
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50) 51.52 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 52.05
130
131
Lognormal GOF Test
132
133
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.934 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
134
135
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.15 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
136
Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
137
138
139
Minimum of Logged Data 2.116 Mean of logged Data 3.466
140
Maximum of Logged Data 5.481 SD of logged Data 0.696
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
Data appear to follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 52.05
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
Benzo(α)pyrene
168
169
General Statistics
170
171
172
173
Maximum 1 Median 0.05
174
175
176
177
Normal GOF Test
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
Gamma GOF Test
190
191
5% A-D Critical Value 0.776 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
192
193
5% K-S Critical Value 0.153 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
194
Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
195
196
Gamma Statistics
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50)) 0.194 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 0.197
206
207
Lognormal GOF Test
208
209
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.934 Data Not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
210
211
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.15 Data Not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
212
Data Not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
213
214
215
Minimum of Logged Data -2.996 Mean of logged Data -2.538
216
Maximum of Logged Data 0 SD of logged Data 0.913
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
Data do not follow a Discernible Distribution (0.05)
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
95% Chebyshev (Mean, Sd) UCL 0.298
236
237
238
239
240
241
242

Detailed Site Investigation PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detailed Site Investigation PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DONALD CANT WATTS CORKE

Detailed Site Investigation

EI Report No.: E23061 AB_Rev0

Original (Saved to Digital Archives) El Australia

Author Technical Reviewer

Emmanuel Woelders Nathan Foster

Revision Details Date Amended By

0 Original 13 March 2017 -

© 2017 EI Australia (EI)

The main objectives of the assessment were to:

 Where site contamination is confirmed, make recommendations for the appropriate

 Asbestos was reported at reported in shallow fill at BH112;

 Further investigation to ascertain the spatial extent of asbestos contamination in soils

Conclusions and Recommendations

 A Hazardous Materials Survey (HMS) should be completed prior to demolition of existing

 Provide a SAQP for the validation of remediation activities performed on-site.

 Preparation of a final site validation report by a qualified environmental consultant, concluding

TABLES (In Text)

1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

 Demolition of the three Mary Potter Nursing Home buildings;

1.3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

 EPA (1995) Sampling Design Guidelines;

 EPA (2014) Technical Note: Investigation of Service Station Sites;

 NEPC (2013) Schedule B(2) Guideline on Site Characterisation;

 Contaminated Land Management Act 1997;

 State Environment Protection Policy 55 (SEPP 55) – Remediation of Land, and

 OEH (2011) Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites.

1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

 Where site contamination is confirmed, make recommendations for the appropriate

1.5 SCOPE OF WORKS

1.5.1 Desktop Study

 Review of existing underground services on site.

1.5.2 Field Work & Laboratory Analysis

1.5.3 Data Analysis and Reporting

Table 2-1 Site Identification, Location and Zoning

Street Address 678 Victoria Road, Ryde NSW

2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USE

Table 2-2 Surrounding Land Uses

Direction Land Use Description Sensitive Receptors (&

2.3 REGIONAL SETTING

Table 2-3 Regional Setting Information

2.4 GROUNDWATER BORE RECORDS AND GROUNDWATER USE

2.5 SITE WALKOVER INSPECTION

3.2 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS

Table 3-1 Summary of Previous Investigation Works and Findings

Assessment Details Project Tasks and Findings

EIS (2015) Stage 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)

Work Objectives The objective of the Stage 1 ESA:

Assessment Details Project Tasks and Findings

EI (2016) Preliminary Site Investigation

Assessment Details Project Tasks and Findings

 A Hazardous Materials Survey (HMS) should be carried out on the existing

 A Detailed Site Investigation (DSI) involving small diameter manual auger

 Should DSI findings indicate the presence of contaminants in soil, groundwater

4. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

4.1 CHEMICAL HAZARDS AND CONTAMINATION SOURCES

4.2 CHEMICALS OF CONCERN

4.3 POTENTIAL SOURCES, EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS

Table 4-1 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model

Potential Potential Sensitive Receptor Migration & Potential Risk of

Groundwater Seepage into the Low

Groundwater Seepage into the Low

Surfaces on HM, Asbestos Site Workers during Dermal Contact Low