Professional Documents
Culture Documents
fall ill from these every year. Many die as a result of consuming unsafe food. FBDs
can also affect economic development through the tourism, agricultural and
food export industries. The South-East Asia Region has the second highest
burden of FBDs after the African Region, with more than 150 million cases and
175 000 deaths annually.
Burden of
foodborne diseases
in the South-East Asia Region
ISBN 978-92-9022-503-4
Acronyms................................................................................................................ v
Annexes
iii
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Acronyms
CA Codex Alimentarius
DALY disability-adjusted life-year
ETEC enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli
EPEC enteropathogenic Escherichia coli
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
FBDs foodborne diseases
FERG Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group
GEMS Global Environmental Monitoring System
HAV hepatitis A virus
IHR (2005) International Health Regulations (2005)
INFOSAN International Food Safety Authorities Network
NTS non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica
POPs persistent organic pollutants
sp., spp. species (sing. and plural)
WHO World Health Organization
v
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Introduction: Foodborne diseases
Food is an essential requirement for humans but it can also be a vehicle of disease
transmission if contaminated with harmful microbes (bacteria, viruses or parasites) or
chemicals/toxins. Globally, billions of people are at risk of foodborne diseases (FBDs)
and millions fall ill every year. Many also die as a result of consuming unsafe food.
Foodborne illnesses are mainly caused due to food contamination with harmful
bacteria, viruses, parasites, toxins or chemicals. Microbial and chemical risks could
be introduced at the farm level (e.g. using water contaminated by industrial waste
or poultry farm waste for irrigation of crops). Similarly, such risks may emerge during
processing, transportation or storage of food and food products.
While many FBDs may be self-limiting, some can be very serious and even result
in death. These diseases may be more serious in children, pregnant women and those
who are older or have a weakened immune system. Children who survive some of
the more serious FBDs may suffer from delayed physical and mental development,
impacting their quality of life permanently. Food allergy is another emerging problem.
A brief description of major FBDs of public health importance is presented in Annex 1.
FBDs are more critical in developing countries due to various reasons, such as use
of unsafe water for cleaning and processing of food, poor food production processes
and food handling, absence of adequate food storage infrastructure, and inadequate
or poorly enforced regulatory standards. The tropical climate in many countries in the
Region also favours the proliferation of pests and naturally occurring toxins and increase
the risk of contracting parasitic diseases including worm infestations.
FBDs can also affect economic development through the tourism, agriculture
and food export industries. In a globalized world, FBDs do not recognize borders. A
local incident can quickly become an international emergency due to the speed and
range of product distribution, impacting health, international relations and trade. A
brief description of foodborne diseases is presented in Annex 1.
1
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Foodborne infections
When certain disease-causing microbes (bacteria, viruses or parasites) contaminate
food, they can cause foodborne illness, often called “food poisoning”. Foods that are
contaminated may not look, taste or smell any different from foods that are safe to eat.
Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella and Escherichia coli (also called E. coli) are the
common bacteria that cause foodborne illnesses. Salmonella is the most common cause
of foodborne illnesses and meat, egg and seafood are common food sources for much
illnesses. Some foodborne bacteria like Listeria monocytogenes can even grow inside
the refrigerator in ready-to-eat food. Staphylococcus aureus bacteria grow in food and
produce toxins that cause staphylococcal food poisoning. Viruses that commonly cause
foodborne illnesses are norovirus and hepatitis A virus (HAV), which can be transmitted
through contaminated water as well as contaminated surfaces.
Foodborne bacteria are often naturally present in food and under the right
conditions, a single bacterium can grow into millions of bacteria in a few hours. These
bacteria multiply rapidly on foods with lots of protein or carbohydrates when food
temperature is between 5 °C and 60 °C, which is often known as the “food danger
zone”. Therefore, most foodborne illnesses and outbreaks are reported during the
summer months.
Bacteria grow and multiply on some types of food more easily than on others. The
types of foods that bacteria prefer include meat, poultry, dairy products, eggs, seafood,
cooked rice, prepared fruit and salads. These foods are more likely to be infected by
foodborne bacteria but other foods could also be infected or cross-contaminated by
them if appropriate food safety measures are not taken during preparation, storage,
transportation and handling .
The symptoms of FBDs range from mild and self-limiting (nausea, vomiting and
diarrhoea with or without blood) to debilitating and life-threatening (such as kidney
and liver failure, brain and neural disorders, paralysis and potentially cancers) leading
to long periods of absenteeism from work and premature death. After eating tainted
food, abdominal cramps, diarrhoea and vomiting can start as early as one hour or
within three days depending on the foodborne pathogen, type of toxin and level of
food contamination.
2
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Chemicals and toxins in food
Food adulteration and falsification are still a problem in countries of the WHO South-
East Asia Region where informal food production and distribution systems are deeply
entrenched at the community level. Adulteration of food is normally observed in its
most crude form where prohibited substances are either added or used to partly or
wholly substitute healthy ingredients or to artificially create the impression of freshness
in stale food. Adulterants may be in solid form, of chemicals, or liquid and made up
of colouring substances. Poisonous colouring agents like auramine, rhodomine b,
malachite green and Sudan red are applied on food items for colouring, brightness
and freshness. This can damage the liver and kidneys sometimes. These agents also
cause stomach cancer, asthma and bladder cancer. Colouring agents such as chrome,
tartazine and erythrosine are used in spices, sauces, juices, lentils and oils, causing
cancer, allergy and respiratory problems. The calcium carbide of industrial grade used
for fruit ripening by unscrupulous traders may contain toxic impurities such as traces
of arsenic and phosphorous, which can be quite harmful for the health and can lead
to various ailments..
Dioxins are byproducts of industrial processes but could also result from natural
phenomena such as volcanic eruptions and forest fires. Human exposure is primarily
through food – mainly meat and dairy products, fish and shellfish. These toxins
accumulate in humans, especially in body fat. Dioxins are toxic to the thyroid gland and
inhibit sperm production, and prolonged exposure leads to accumulation in the body.
The dioxin concentration in breast milk fat directly reflects its concentration in body fat.
Most natural toxins found in fish are produced by species (spp.) of naturally
occurring marine algae. They accumulate in fish when they feed on the algae or
on other fish that have fed on the algae. Ciguatera fish poisoning is associated with
consumption of toxin-contaminated subtropical and tropical reef fish. Unfortunately,
3
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
these toxins are not destroyed by normal cooking or processing. Naturally occurring
cyanogenic glycosides are found in raw or unprocessed cassava (Manihot esculenta),
which can cause nerve damage or death if consumed in quantity.
Food poisoning from the consumption of poisonous wild mushrooms has been
reported frequently during the monsoon season in countries of the South-East Asia
Region. In some episodes, whole families have lost their lives due to consumption of
poisonous wild mushrooms. The majority of fatal mushroom poisoning occurs due to
ingestion of Amanita phalloides – the death cap – due to its high content of Amatoxin, a
potent cytotoxin. Fatal poisoning is usually associated with delayed onset of symptoms,
which are very severe and have a toxic effect on the liver, kidney and nervous system.
Unfortunately, cases remain undiagnosed, under-reported and unpublished as these
happen in rural communities.
Food allergy
Food allergy is an abnormal response to a food triggered by the body’s immune system.
Individuals with food allergies develop symptoms by eating foods that for the vast
majority of the population are part of a healthy diet. Food allergy is a growing problem.
The prevalence of food allergies in the general population has been roughly estimated
to be around 1–3% in adults and 4–6% in children.
Peanut or groundnut allergy occurs early in life (<five years of age) and is believed
to be lifelong. Egg and milk allergies are most common food allergies among infants but
are often outgrown. More than 70 foods have been described as causing food allergies.
Several studies indicate that 75% of allergic reactions among children are due to a
limited number of foods, namely egg, peanuts, milk, fish and nuts. Fruits, vegetables,
nuts and peanuts are responsible for most allergic reactions among adults.
Food allergies are a concern for both the allergic individual and also all involved
in supplying and preparing food, including family and friends, caterers, restaurants
and the food industry. There is no cure for food allergies, so it is important to avoid
the food that cause the allergy. Having the correct information to eat, order food and
shop wisely can make a big difference. People with food allergies have to be extremely
careful about what they eat. Eating away from home is often risky for an allergic person.
Food allergic individuals need to know what to avoid eating. They are dependent
on reliable and easy-to-find information about the ingredients of the foods they buy.
Food labelling is, therefore, very important to those with food allergies as there can be
potentially serious consequences.
4
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Global burden of foodborne
diseases
Foodborne diseases (FBDs) are an important cause of illness and death around the
world. However, the extent and cost of unsafe food, and especially the burden due to
chemical and parasitic contaminants in food, is still not fully known. Epidemiological
data on FBDs and laboratory capacity to detect the cause of FBDs are not available
widely, particularly in the developing world. As a result, many foodborne outbreaks
often go unrecognized, unreported or uninvestigated.
A major problem in addressing food safety concerns is the lack of accurate data/
information regarding the extent and cost of FBDs. Lack of comprehensive data and
information on the burden of FBDs makes it challenging for policy-makers to set public
health priorities and allocate resources. Therefore, the World Health Organization
(WHO) has taken an initiative to carry out an estimation of the global burden of FBDs
and generation of evidence-based data and information that will enable policy-makers
to prioritize and allocate resources for food safety.
Objectives
WHO Department of Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodborne Diseases together with
its partners launched the initiative to estimate the global burden of FBDs in 2006.
The primary goal of the initiative is to enable policy-makers and other stakeholders
to set appropriate, evidence-based priorities in the area of food safety. After an initial
consultation, WHO established a Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference
Group (FERG) in 2007 to lead the initiative. These objectives were to:
•• strengthen the capacity of Member States to conduct the burden of
foodborne disease assessments and to increase the number of Member
States that have undertaken a burden of foodborne disease study;
5
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
•• provide estimates on the global burden of FBDs according to age, sex and
regions for a defined list of causative agents of microbial, parasitic and
chemical origin;
•• increase awareness and commitment among Member States for the
implementation of food safety standards; and
•• encourage Member States to use burden of foodborne disease estimates for
cost-effective analyses of prevention, intervention and control measures.
Methodology
These objectives were addressed through the establishment of six task forces, each
pursuing on groups of hazards or select aspects of the methodology. Together with the
WHO Secretariat, these task forces commissioned systematic reviews and other studies
to provide the data from which burden estimates could be calculated.
The six WHO regions were divided into 14 subregions as shown in Figure 1, based
on five categories considering child and adult mortality rates, as follows:
•• Category A: very low child and adult mortality
•• Category B: low child mortality and very low adult mortality
•• Category C: low child mortality and high adult mortality
•• Category D: high child and adult mortality
•• Category E: high child mortality and very high adult mortality
6
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Figure 1: Categorization of subgroups under WHO regions for estimation of global
burden of foodborne diseases
The list of countries that were divided into 14 subregions is available in Annex 3. A
country can obtain national estimates by referring to estimates for the subregion to
which it belong.
In addition to providing global and regional estimates, the initiative also sought
to promote actions at a national level. This involved capacity-building through national
foodborne disease burden studies, and encouraging the use of information on the
burden of disease in setting evidence-informed policies. A suite of tools and resources
were created to facilitate national studies on the burden of foodborne diseases and
pilot studies were conducted in four countries (Albania, Japan, Thailand and Uganda).
7
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Table 1: Hazards and foodborne diseases considered in studies
Hazards Foodborne diseases
Diarrhoeal disease Virus (1) Norovirus
agents Bacteria (7) Campylobacter sp., Enteropathogenic E.
coli (EPEC), Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC),
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, Non-typhoidal
Salmonella enterica, Shigella sp., Vibrio cholerae
(V. cholerae)
Protozoa (3) Cryptosporidium sp., Entamoeba histolytica,
Giardia sp.
Invasive infectious Virus (1) Hepatitis virus A (HAV)
disease agents Bacteria (5) Brucella sp., Listeria monocytogenes,
Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), Salmonella
paratyphi A (S. paratyphi A), Salmonella typhi
(S. typhi)
Protozoan (1) Toxoplasma gondii
Helminths Cestodes (3) Echinococcus granulosus, Echinococcus
multilocularis, Taenia solium (T.solium)
Nematodes (2) Ascaris sp., Trichinella sp.
Trematodes (5) Clonorchis sinensis, Fasciola sp., Opisthorchis
sp., Paragonimus sp., intestinal fluke
Chemicals Toxins and poisons (3) Aflatoxin, Cassava cyanide, Dioxin
8
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Figure 2: Burden of foodborne illness
1 in 10 people in the world fall ill every year due to eating contaminated food
Source: FERG Report (2015)
The global burden of FBDs is considerable with marked regional variations. The
burden of FBDs is borne by individuals of all ages, but particularly children under five
years of age and persons living in low-income regions of the world. Nearly 40% of the
foodborne disease burden was among children under five years of age with 18 million
DALY lost due to foodborne diarrhoeal disease agents, particularly NTS and EPEC.
Other foodborne hazards with a substantial contribution to the global burden included
S. typhi and T. solium.
Data gaps were a major hurdle to making estimates of the foodborne disease
burden in these national studies. The global and regional estimates provided by
FERG offer an interim solution until improved surveillance and laboratory capacity is
developed.
It is likely that the true number of illnesses and deaths resulting from FBDs
worldwide is even higher because:
•• many cases of food poisoning go unrecognized and untreated,
•• there are gaps in the collection and reporting of data (especially in
developing countries) on the burden of FBDs,
•• there are other causes beyond the 31 hazards included in this report,
especially in the chemical domain,
•• for certain foodborne hazards, there is still considerable uncertainty
regarding their clinical impact. Current estimates only included symptoms
for which sufficient evidence existed.
9
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
WHO is focusing its efforts on supporting national policy-makers and governments
in improving surveillance of FBDs to obtain a clearer picture of the unique local
challenges and implement the right strategies to prevent, detect and manage foodborne
risks.
An important goal of the FERG initiative and the next step in the process is to
encourage and support countries in undertaking foodborne burden of disease studies,
using consistent WHO tools and processes. Therefore, a guide to national burden of
foodborne diseases study has been briefly mentioned in Annex 2.
10
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Foodborne diseases in the WHO
South-East Asia Region
Home to a quarter of the world’s population, the WHO South-East Asia Region has
the second highest burden of FBDs per population among WHO regions. It has more
than half of the global infections and deaths due to typhoid fever or hepatitis A.
Based on data (2010) from the FERG report, the annual burden of FBDs in the
South-East Asia Region includes more than:
•• 150 million illnesses
•• 175 000 deaths
•• 12 million DALYs.
Figure 3: Top 10 causes of foodborne illnesses in the WHO South-East Asia Region
Campylobacter species
Shigella species
Enterotoxigenic E. coli
Non-typhoidal S. enterica
Norovirus
Enteropathogenic E. coli
Hepatitis A virus
Entamoeba histolytica
Ascaris species
Salmonella typhi
11
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
As shown in Figure 3, Campylobacter sp. was the leading cause of foodborne illness
with an estimated more than 20 million cases every year in the Region. This was followed
by Shigella sp. and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli with more than 19 million cases
each. At the fourth spot, NTS was estimated to cause more than 16 million infections.
In aggregate terms, E. coli and S. spp. were the leading causes of foodborne
illnesses. Norovirus and hepatitis A virus also caused significant diseases in the Region.
Amoebiasis caused by Entamoeba histolytica and worm infestation by Ascaris sp. were
the leading parasitic causes of illness due to contaminated food.
Among the parasites, the pork tapeworm (T. solium) was estimated to cause more
than 6800 deaths annually. Despite being the leading cause of foodborne illness in the
Region, Campylobacter sp. caused only 6700 deaths here.
12
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Going by the estimated burden of FBDs in terms of DALYs in the Region as shown
in Figure 5, S. typhi is the leading cause of ill-health, disability or early death and leads
to the highest number of DALYs (nearly 2.3 million). S. paratyphi A that causes a similar
illness was also estimated to be responsible for more than half a million DALYs every year.
Viral causes of foodborne diseases – norovirus and hepatitis A virus were estimated
to be responsible for nearly 1.3 million and 870 000 DALYs every year.
The pork tapeworm was responsible for nearly 670 000 DALY and Campylobacter
sp. and cholera led to 600 000 and 530 000 DALY respectively.
13
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Figure 6: Under-five children suffering from diarrhoea in the
WHO South-East Asia Region
The Region contributes to one third of the global deaths due to diarrhoea in
children under five years of age that could be prevented.
Figure 7: Top 10 causes of foodborne illnesses in children under five years of age in
the South-East Asia Region
Enterotoxigenic E. coli
Enteropathogenic E. coli
Campylobacter spp.
Shigella spp.
Norovirus
Non-typhoidal S. enterica
Ascaris spp.
Giardia spp.
Hepatitis A virus
Entamoeba histolytica
In children under five years of age (as shown in Figure 7), the top three causes of
foodborne illnesses were ETEC (nearly 11 million cases), EPEC (nearly 7.3 million cases)
and Campylobacter sp. (nearly 7 million cases).
Shigella sp., norovirus and NTS caused 5.2, 5 and 4.4 million illnesses respectively
and hepatitis A virus caused nearly 1.4 million cases in children under five years of age.
14
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Figure 8: Top 10 causes of deaths due to foodborne illnesses in children under five
years of age in the South-East Asia Region
Enteropathogenic E. coli
Salmonella typhi
Norovirus
Non-typhoidal S. enterica
Enterotoxigenic E. coli
Campylobacter spp.
Hepatitis A virus
Shigella spp.
Salmonella paratyphi A
Taenia solium
As shown in Figure 8, the top three causes of death due to FBDs in children
under five years of age in the Region were EPEC (nearly 7400), S. typhi (6600) and
norovirus (4000).
Other major causes of death in children under five years of age were estimated
to be NTS (3663 deaths), ETEC (3532 deaths), Campylobacter spp. (3322 deaths) and
hepatitis A virus (2805 deaths).
Figure 9: Top 10 causes of DALYs due to foodborne illnesses in children under five
years of age in the South-East Asia Region
Enteropathogenic E. coli
Salmonella typhi
Norovirus
Non-typhoidal S. enterica
Enterotoxigenic E. coli
Campylobacter spp.
Hepatitis A virus
Shigella spp.
Dioxin
Ascaris spp.
0 100 000 200 000 300 000 400 000 500 000 600 000 700 000 800 000
15
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
In terms of DALY due to FBDs in children under five years of age (as shown in
Figure 9), the leading cause was EPEC (nearly 674 000 DALY), followed by S. typhi
(610 000 DALY) and norovirus (nearly 364 000 DALY).
Other causes of DALYs include NTS, ETEC, Campylobacter sp. hepatitis A virus,
Shigella sp. and dioxin. Interestingly, dioxin was estimated to have a significant impact
in children under five years of age in the Region with more than 160 000 DALYs. It
was based on the result of breast milk testing for a persistent organic pollutants (POPs)
study carried out in India under the Global Environmental Monitoring System (GEMS).
16
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Conclusions and action points
The most comprehensive report to date on the impact of contaminated food on health
and well-being is titled ‘Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases’. These
estimates are the result of a decade of work, including inputs from more than 100
experts from around the world. Based on what we know now, it is apparent that the
global burden of FBDs is considerable. The FERG report highlights the global threat
posed by FBDs in the context of globalization of the food trade. Unsafe food endangers
everyone and billions of people are at risk.
The global burden of FBDs is considerable with marked regional variations. The
burden of FBDs is borne by individuals of all ages, and particularly children under five
years of age and persons living in low-income regions of the world. These estimates
are conservative; further studies are needed to address the data gaps and limitations
of this study. The considerable difference in the burden of foodborne disease between
low- and high-income regions suggests that a major proportion of the current burden
is avoidable and that control methods do exist.
The report highlights that action to reduce illnesses and deaths from FBDs must
be tailored according to regional and national needs as the types of contaminants and
reasons for their prevalence differ across the world. The report will support policy-
makers in implementing the right strategies to prevent, detect and manage foodborne
risks to improve food safety.
The report will enable governments achieve the Sustainable Development Goal
2 for food security and nutrition (target 2.1: “By 2030, end hunger and ensure access
by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including
infants, to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round”). The achievement of Goal
3 (Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages); Goal 1 (End Poverty
in all its forms everywhere) and Goal 8 (Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable
17
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all) will also
be cited through promoting the safety of food supply domestically and internationally.
The report also reinforces the need for governments, the food industry and
individuals to do more to make food safe and prevent foodborne illnesses and
intoxications. Safe drinking water, good hygienic practices and improved sanitation
are keys for preventing foodborne illnesses and intoxications.
The majority of FBDs and deaths are preventable. Food safety is a public health
priority and governments should develop policies and regulatory frameworks to establish
and implement effective food safety systems. Food safety systems should ensure that
food producers and suppliers along the whole food chain operate responsibly and
supply safe food to consumers.
Food safety is a shared responsibility. All food operators and consumers should
understand the roles they must play to protect their health and that of the wider
community. All stakeholders can contribute to improvements in food safety throughout
the food chain by incorporating these estimates into policy development at the national
and international levels.
Think globally, act locally: while there is no single, global solution to the problem
of FBDs, a strengthened food safety system in one country will positively impact the
safety of food in other countries. There is need for coordinated, cross-border action
across the entire food supply chain.
Coordinated action at the global, regional and national levels is needed to address
risks of FBDs and ensure food safety. Education and training are needed on prevention
of FBDs among food producers, suppliers, handlers and the general public, including
women and school children.
Key action points towards ensuring food safety in the Region include the conduct
of national studies on the burden of FBDs, strengthening of laboratory capacity to be
able to detect FBDs, and strengthening the surveillance of FBDs, including the collation
of local data to validate regional estimates and translation of estimates of FBDs into
food safety policy.
18
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
2015 clearly illustrates that most Member States have limited capacity for surveillance,
assessment and management of priority food safety events. Therefore, the WHO
Regional Office for South-East Asia is providing technical support to Member States
to evaluate existing national foodborne disease surveillance systems, including risk
assessment and the management of food safety events, and to identify action plans to
improve surveillance, assessment and management of priority FBDs and food safety
events.
WHO is working with governments and partners to reduce the level of food
contamination throughout different stages of the food-chain. These stages include
the point of final consumption to the levels at which the exposure to pathogens and
contaminants does not pose significant risks for human health.
WHO promotes the use of international platforms such as the joint WHO-FAO
(Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) International Food Safety
Authorities Network (INFOSAN) to ensure effective and rapid communication during
food safety emergencies. WHO also works closely with other international organizations
to ensure food safety along the entire food-chain, from production to consumption,
in line with the Codex Alimentarius (CA). CA is a collection of international food
standards, guidelines and codes of practice covering all main foods and steps in the
food supply chain.
FBDs are preventable. WHO is promoting the important role that everyone can
play to promote food safety through systematic disease prevention and awareness
programmes. WHO’s Five Keys to Safer Food explains the basic principles that each
individual should know all over the world to prevent FBDs:
(1) Keep clean
–– thoroughly wash raw fruits and vegetables with tap water.
–– keep clean hands, kitchen and chopping board all the time.
(2) Separate raw and cooked food
–– do not mix raw food and ready-to-eat food.
–– do not mix raw meat, fish and raw vegetables.
(3) Cook thoroughly
–– thoroughly cook all meat, poultry and seafood, especially shellfish.
–– reheat all leftovers until they are steaming hot.
19
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
(4) Keep food at safe temperatures
–– refrigerate cooked food within two hours of preparation.
–– never defrost food at room temperature; defrost frozen food in the
refrigerator, cold water or the microwave.
(5) Use safe water and raw materials
–– use safe drinking water for food preparation.
–– check use-by dates and labels while buying packed food.
20
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Annex 1
Classification of foodborne diseases1
2
Etiologic agent or Incubation Signs and Specimens to
Disease Food implicated Contributing factors
cause period (latency) symptoms be obtained
1. Initial or major signs and symptoms of the upper digestive tracts (nausea, vomiting)
1.1 Incubation period tends to be less than 1 hour
Fungal agents
Poisoning by Possibly resin-type From 30 minutes Nausea, vomiting, Many varieties of Vomit Ingestion of unknown
mushrooms of the substances found to 2 hours retching, diarrhoea, wild mushrooms toxic varieties of
group that causes in some types of abdominal pains mushrooms, through
gastrointestinal irritation mushrooms confusion with other
edible varieties
Chemical agents
Antimony poisoning Antimony in From a few Vomiting, abdominal Very acid food and Vomit, stool and Use of utensils that
enamelled iron minutes to 1 hour pains, diarrhoea beverages urine contain antimony,
utensils storage of very acid
food in enamelled iron
utensils
Cadmium poisoning Cadmium in plated From 15 to 30 Nausea, vomiting, Very acid foods Vomit, stool, Use of utensils that
utensils minutes abdominal pains, and drinks, candies urine and blood contain cadmium,
diarrhoea, shock and other cake storage of very acid
decorations food in containers that
contain cadmium,
ingestion of foods that
contain cadmium
1 Adapted and modified from Instituto Panamericano de Protección de Alimentos y Zoonosis (INPPAZ) – Pan American Health Organization WHO
2 Samples should be collected from any of the listed foods that have been ingested during the incubation period of the disease.
3 Carbon monoxide poisoning can resemble some of the diseases included in this category. Patients who have been inside a closed automobile with the motor running or who have been in heated rooms with poor
23
24
Etiologic agent or Incubation Signs and Specimens to
Disease Food implicated Contributing factors
cause period (latency) symptoms be obtained
Diarrheal shellfish Okadaico acid From 1/2 to 12 Diarrhoea, nausea, Mussels, clams, Gastric rinse Shellfish caught in water
poisoning (DSP) and other toxins hours, usually 4 abdominal pains oysters with high concentration
produced by hours of Dynophysis spp.
dinoflagellates of
the Dinophysis spp.
1.3 Incubation period usually from 7 to 12 hours
Fungal agents
Poisoning caused by Cyclopeptides From 6 to 24 Abdominal pains, Amanita phalloides, Urine, blood, Ingestion of certain
mushrooms of the and gyromitrine hours feeling of fullness, A. verna, Galerina vomit spp. of Amanita,
cyclopeptide and found in certain vomiting, prolonged autumnalis. Galerina and Giromitra
Giromitra groups mushrooms diarrhoea, loss Esculenta giromitra mushrooms, ingestion
of strength, (false colmenilla) of unknown varieties of
thirst, muscle and similar spp. of mushrooms, confusion
cramps, rapid mushrooms of toxic mushrooms with
and weak pulse, edible varieties
collapse, jaundice,
25
26
Etiologic agent or Incubation Signs and Specimens to
Disease Food implicated Contributing factors
cause period (latency) symptoms be obtained
2.3 Incubation period from 3 to 30 days
Rickettsial agent
Q Fever Coxiella burnetii 2-3 weeks (3-30 Chills, headache, Raw milk from Serum Consumption of raw
days) malaise, myalgia and infected cattle or milk, direct contact
sweets goats, direct contact with aborted materials,
with contaminated inadequate disinfection
materials and disposal of aborted
materials
3. Initial or major signs and symptoms of the lower digestive tract (abdominal pains, diarrhoea)
3.1 Incubation period usually from 7 to 12 hours
Bacterial agents
Gastroenteritis Exoenterotoxin of B. From 8 to 16 Nausea, abdominal Foods made Stool Inadequate refrigeration,
by Bacillus cereus cereus, organisms in hours (average of pains, diarrhoea from grains, rice, storage of food at warm
(diarrheal type) the soil 12 hours) custard, sauces, temperatures (bacterial
meatballs, sausages, incubation), preparation
The FERG’s report on the global burden of foodborne diseases highlights the worldwide
threat of FBDs and emphasizes the need for all national governments, the food industry
and individuals to work together to make food safe and prevent FBDs. The report also
highlights that action to reduce the impact, illnesses and deaths due to FBDs needs to
be adapted based on national needs as the types of food contaminants and reasons
for their prevalence differ in various regions and countries.
The anticipated uses of the results from the burden of foodborne disease studies
are:
(1) prioritization of food safety as an issue within a country.
(2) prioritization of specific food safety issues within a country.
(3) provision of a baseline against which to evaluate future food safety
interventions,
(4) providing assistance with harmonization of international trade and regulatory
standards,
42
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
(5) assessment of equivalence of food safety controls for import and export risk
assessments (e.g. within the context of Codex Alimentarius).
The following tools and documents, developed by the FERG, shall help national
governments in undertaking the studies to estimate the disease burden of FBDs in
countries.
This has been developed to help policy-makers identify the most prevalent FBDs in
their regions based on which they could develop appropriate actions to address them
in their countries. By looking at the burden of foodborne diseases in different regions
of the world, the report may also help countries identify relevant lessons on how to
control certain FBDs. The regional burden shall also help prioritize foodborne risks
in countries of the SEA Region and the need for further national studies needed to
quantify them accurately.
This document describes a protocol for the measurement of the burden of FBDs and
provides information on DALY calculations. It also provides a detailed description of
how incidence data may be derived from different data sources and underreporting
and under-ascertainment, as sources of uncertainty, are explained in detail. Researchers
aiming to undertake the burden of foodborne disease studies in their countries can use
this protocol developed under the framework of FERG.
43
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
3. FERG priority setting tool (WHO, 2012)
This prioritization tool is intended to assist with the identification of agents relevant to the
national burden of foodborne disease study. Agents that will be addressed by the FERG
in its global and regional burden of foodborne disease studies have been categorized
into two groups: (i) global agents of importance in all countries (should be considered
by all national burden studies), and (ii) local agents, which are of importance in some
specific countries or regions, especially in the case of parasitic hazards.
The tool provides key questions to help countries in determining which foodborne
hazards are relevant for their national burden of FBDs study. The list of local agents
may be complemented by additional local agents not addressed by FERG but which
may still be relevant to the national study.
The list of priority pathogens for a specific national burden of foodborne disease
study consists of all “global” and a selection of the “local” agents addressed by FERG and
possibly complemented with other agents that are of particular relevance to the country.
As a part of the FBDs burden protocol to be used in country studies, this guidance
document provides a checklist for participating countries to take stock of existing data
required for the national study and is intended to be an aid to data gathering. However,
it is neither comprehensive nor exhaustive.
44
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
(3) Food consumption and contamination data
–– Qualitative and quantitative description of food consumption;
–– Qualitative and quantitative description of food contamination.
This guidance document contains four appendices, which contain additional useful
information for the countries undertaking a national burden of foodborne disease study:
Each of the three agent-specific task forces has generated a list of specific information
needed for its priority agents and corresponding data sources. These task force data
sheets may guide countries in their data collection process.
Relevant online databases and search engines for scientific and grey literature and
online survey catalogues.
The data sources, identified by the Source Attribution Task Force, will be used for
the compilation of a global Food Consumption Atlas. These specific data sources can
contribute to the assessment of national food consumption patterns.
Where possible, estimates will be made for five-year age groups and separately for
males and females. The recommended age groups presented in this appendix coincide
with the age groups in the Global Burden of Diseases 2010.
This manual addresses the situation analysis/context mapping exercise. The objective
is to provide countries undertaking a national burden of foodborne disease study with
a guide to situation analysis/context mapping and knowledge translation to support
the use of burden of disease information in policy-making.
45
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
6. FERG workplan matrix for the Country Study Monitoring Matrix
(WHO, 2013)
This is a matrix to assist the countries to monitor the progress of their studies and is
intended to be customized and adapted based on specific country workplans. The
country study monitoring matrix consists of two main sections: content and process of
the monitoring exercise. The content section consists of five items – activity, specific
tasks, activity leader, timelines and final deliverable/output; and the process section
consists of four items – monitoring lead, dates for monitoring and reporting, target
audience and comments.
This is a draft outline to assist countries to prepare a final report of the country study
to estimate the burden of FBDs.
46
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Annex 3: Categorization of
subgroups under WHO regions
Subregion WHO Member States
AFR D Algeria; Angola; Benin; Burkina Faso; Cameroon; Cape Verde; Chad; Comoros;
Equatorial Guinea; Gabon; Gambia; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Liberia;
Madagascar; Mali; Mauritania; Mauritius; Niger; Nigeria; Sao Tome and Principe;
Senegal; Seychelles; Sierra Leone; Togo.
AFR E Botswana; Burundi; Central African Republic; Congo; Côte d'Ivoire; Democratic
Republic of the Congo; Eritrea; Ethiopia; Kenya; Lesotho; Malawi; Mozambique;
Namibia; Rwanda; South Africa; Swaziland; Uganda; United Republic of
Tanzania; Zambia; Zimbabwe.
AMR A Canada; Cuba; United States of America.
AMR B Antigua and Barbuda; Argentina; Bahamas; Barbados; Belize; Brazil; Chile;
Colombia; Costa Rica; Dominica; Dominican Republic; El Salvador; Grenada;
Guyana; Honduras; Jamaica; Mexico; Panama; Paraguay; Saint Kitts and Nevis;
Saint Lucia; Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; Suriname; Trinidad and Tobago;
Uruguay; Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of).
AMR D Bolivia (Plurinational State of); Ecuador; Guatemala; Haiti; Nicaragua; Peru.
EMR B Bahrain; Iran (Islamic Republic of); Jordan; Kuwait; Lebanon; Libyan Arab
Jamahiriya; Oman; Qatar; Saudi Arabia; Syrian Arab Republic; Tunisia; United
Arab Emirates.
EMR D Afghanistan; Djibouti; Egypt; Iraq; Morocco; Pakistan; Somalia; South Sudan;
Sudan; Yemen.
EUR A Andorra; Austria; Belgium; Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Denmark; Finland;
France; Germany; Greece; Iceland; Ireland; Israel; Italy; Luxembourg; Malta;
Monaco; Netherlands; Norway; Portugal; San Marino; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden;
Switzerland; United Kingdom.
EUR B Albania; Armenia; Azerbaijan; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Georgia;
Kyrgyzstan; Montenegro; Poland; Romania; Serbia; Slovakia; Tajikistan; The
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; Turkey; Turkmenistan; Uzbekistan.
EUR C Belarus; Estonia; Hungary; Kazakhstan; Latvia; Lithuania; Republic of Moldova;
Russian Federation; Ukraine.
SEAR B Indonesia; Sri Lanka; Thailand.
SEAR D Bangladesh; Bhutan; Democratic People's Republic of Korea; India; Maldives;
Myanmar; Nepal; Timor-Leste.
WPR A Australia; Brunei Darussalam; Japan; New Zealand; Singapore.
WPR B Cambodia; China; Cook Islands; Fiji; Kiribati; Lao People's Democratic Republic;
Malaysia; Marshall Islands; Micronesia (Federated States of); Mongolia; Nauru;
Niue; Palau; Papua New Guinea; Philippines; Republic of Korea; Samoa;
Solomon Islands; Tonga; Tuvalu; Vanuatu; Viet Nam.
47
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Notes:
(1) The subregions are defined on the basis of child and adult mortality as
described by Ezzati et al.4 Stratum A = very low child and adult mortality;
Stratum B = low child mortality and very low adult mortality; Stratum C =
low child mortality and high adult mortality; Stratum D = high child and
adult mortality; and Stratum E = high child mortality and very high adult
mortality. The use of the term subregion here and throughout the text does
not identify an official grouping of WHO Member States and the subregions
are not related to the six official WHO regions, which are AFR = African
Region; AMR = Region of the Americas; EMR = Eastern Mediterranean
Region; EUR = European Region; SEAR = South-East Asia Region; WPR
= Western Pacific Region.
(2) South Sudan was re-assigned to the WHO African Region in May 2013. As
this study relates to time periods prior to this date, estimates for South Sudan
were included in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.
4 Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ, Comparative Risk Assessment Collabo- rating Group (2002) Selected major risk
factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 360 (9343):1347–1360. PMID: 12423980.
48
Burden of foodborne diseases in the South-East Asia Region
Globally, billions of people are at risk of foodborne diseases (FBDs) and millions
fall ill from these every year. Many die as a result of consuming unsafe food. FBDs
can also affect economic development through the tourism, agricultural and
food export industries. The South-East Asia Region has the second highest
burden of FBDs after the African Region, with more than 150 million cases and
175 000 deaths annually.
Burden of
foodborne diseases
in the South-East Asia Region
ISBN 978-92-9022-503-4