Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Education
REGION X
Division of Lanao del Norte
RAMAIN INTEGRATED SCHOOL
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
KRA
Very Satisfactory
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
Education Knowledge and of content within and to March of content and its of content and its of content and its
Services Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 integration within integration within integration within
teaching areas. and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown in
inMOV1witha rating inMOV1witha rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 2. Used a range of AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
Education teaching strategies to March of content and its of content and its of content and its
Services that enhance learner 2019 integration within integration within integration within
achievement in literacy and across subject and across subject and across subject
and numeracy skills. areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown in
inMOV1witha rating inMOV1witha rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 3. Applied a range of AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different
Education teaching strategies to to March teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
Services develop critical and 2019 that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
creative thinking, as and creative and creative and creative
well as other higher- thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
order thinking skills. other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Education Environment classroom structure to March management management management
Services and Diversity of to engage learners, 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that
Learners individually or in engage learners engage learners engage learners
groups, in in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks
meaningful as shown in MOV as shown in as shown in MOV
exploration, 1 with a rating of MOV1witha rating 1 with a rating of
discovery and 7 of 6 5
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
within a range of
physical learning
environments. Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2
least 4 lessons lessons lessons as
supported by supported by evidenced by
MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and
of the other of the other supported by any
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV 1of the other
given MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 5. Managed learner AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher
Education behavior to March management management management
Services constructively by 2019 strategies of strategies that strategies of
applying positive learner behavior engage learners learner behavior
and non-violent that promote in activities/tasks that promote
discipline to ensure positive and non- as shown in positive and non-
learning- focused violent discipline MOV1witha rating violent discipline
environments. as shown in MOV of 6 as shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 6. Used AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied
Education differentiated, to March differentiated differentiated differentiated
Services developmentally 2019 teaching teaching teaching
appropriate learning strategies to strategies to strategies to
experiences to address learner address learner address learner
address learners’ diversity as diversity as diversity as
gender, needs, shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
and experiences.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2
least 4 differentiated differentiated
differentiated teaching teaching
teaching strategies in at strategies in 2
strategies in at least 2 lessons lessons as
least 2 lessons as evidenced by evidenced by
as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and supported by supported by
supported by any any1ofthe other any1ofthe other
1 of the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Education and Planning managed and to March implemented implemented implemented
Services implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and
and learning learning process learning process learning process
processes to meet as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
curriculum 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
requirements and 7 6 5
varied teaching
contexts.
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Education collegial discussions to March participated in participated in participated in
Services that use teacher and 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/
learner feedback to meetings to meetings to meetings to
enrich teaching discuss discuss discuss
practice. teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 9. Selected, AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Education developed, to March used varied used varied used varied
Services organized and used 2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and
appropriate teaching learning learning learning
and learning resources, resources, resources,
resources, including including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
ICT, to address address learning address learning address learning
learning goals. goals as shown goals as shown goals as shown
in MOV1witha in MOV1witha in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
KRA
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed,
Education and Reporting selected, organized to March selected, selected, selected,
Services and used diagnostic, 2019 organized and organized and organized and
formative and used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
summative formative and formative and formative and
assessment summative summative summative
strategies consistent assessment assessment assessment
with curriculum strategies strategies strategies
requirements. consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 11. Monitored and AUG. 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Education evaluated learner to March monitored and monitored and monitored and
Services progress and 2019 evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner
achievement using progress and progress and progress and
learner attainment achievement achievement achievement
data. using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
KRA
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 12. Communicated AUG 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Education promptly and clearly to March showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt
Services the learners’ needs, 2019 and clear and clear and clear
progress and communication of communication of communication of
achievement to key the learners’ the learners’ the learners’
stakeholders, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
including and achievement and achievement and achievement
parents/guardians. to key to key to key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Performance Indicators
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
(4)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed AUG. 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Education various related to March performed performed performed
Services works/activities that 2019 various related various related various related
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities
teaching-learning that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to
process. the teaching the teaching the teaching
learning process learning process learning process
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Norte
D SCHOOL
s Rating
Actual Results Score
Poor
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Showed knowledge No acceptable
of content and its evidence was
3 2 2 2.5 0.1875
integration within shown
and
across subject 4
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 4
Submitted any 1 No
of the given MOV acceptable
evidence was
shown
5
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Showed knowledge No acceptable
of content and its evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
integration within shown
and
across subject 4
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 4
s Rating
Submitted 1 No acceptable
lesson as evidence was
evidenced by any shown
1of the given MOV 3
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Used classroom No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
management evidence was
strategies that shown
engage learners
in
activities/tasks 4
as shown in
MOV 1with a
rating of 4
Submitted 1 No acceptable
lesson supported evidence was
by any of the shown
acceptable
MOV 4
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Applied teacher No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
management evidence was
strategies of shown
learner behavior
that promote
positive and
non-violent
discipline as 4
shown in MOV
submitted with a
rating of 4
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Applied No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
differentiated evidence was
teaching shown
strategies to
address learner
diversity as 3
shown in MOV
1 with a rating
of 4
Submitted any 1 No acceptable
at least 4 lessons evidence was
as observed in 3 shown
lessons as
observed in 2
lessons observed
in only 1 lesson
differentiated
teaching strategy
in only 1 lesson
as evidently 3
shown in any 1 of
the acceptable
MOV
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Planned and No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
implemented evidence was
developmentally shown
sequenced
teaching and
learning 4
process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally evidence was
sequenced shown
teaching and
learning
process as
evidently shown
in any 1 of the 4
given MOV
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
participated in evidence was
LAC/FGD/ shown
meeting to
discuss
teacher/learner
feedback to 4
enrich
instruction as
shown in the
MOV submitted
Participated in 1 No acceptable
LAC/FGD/ in any evidence was
1 of the given shown
MOV
4
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Developed and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
used varied evidence was
teaching and shown
learning
resources,
including ICT, to
address 5
learning goals
as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 4
s Rating
Actual Results Score
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Designed, No acceptable 3 3 3 3 0.225
selected, evidence was
organized and shown
used diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with 4
curriculum
requirements as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of
Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool evidence was
as evidently shown
shown in any of
the acceptable
3
MOV
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Rarely monitored No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
and evaluated evidence was
learner progress shown
and
achievement
using learner
attainment data 4
as shown in the
MOV submitted
Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was
shown 4
s Rating
Actual Results Score
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Rarely showed No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
prompt and clear evidence was
communication of shown
the learners’
needs, progress
and
achievement to
key
stakeholders,
including 4
parents/
guardians as
shown in the
MOV submitted
Submitted any 1
of the given MOV
4
s Rating
Poor Actual Results Score
Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Rarely performed No acceptable 3 3 3 0.3
various related evidence was
work/activities shown
that contribute
to the teaching
learning process
as shown in the 5
MOV submitted
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about knowledge of content within and
across curriculum teaching areas
1. Applied knowledge of
content within and across 3. Instructional materials highlighting
curriculum teaching areas. mastery of content and its integration in
other subject areas
Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with
appropriate instructional materials
appended
2. Certificate of Training
3. Certificate of Speakership
4. Committee involvement
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersons hip
TION TEMPLATE
Description of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A
Division of QUEZON
Your School Here
Your District Here
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results
KRA
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Collaborated with June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed-action No acceptable
Education colleagues in the March 2019 completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
4 4 4 4
Services conduct and disseminated action research with colleagues. colleagues shown
application of research research with colleagues.
to enrich knowledge of colleagues.
content and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 3. Developed and June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Education applied effective March 2019 effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
4 4 4
Services teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking as creative thinking as creative thinking as creative thinking as
well as other higher- well as other HOTS well as other HOTS well as other HOTS well as other HOTS
order thinking skills. as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
Timeliness
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 5. Exibited effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Exibited effective Exibited effective Exibited effective Exibited effective No acceptable 4 4 4
Education and constructive to March and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was
Services behavior 2019 behavior behavior behavior behavior shown
management skills management management management management
by applying positive skills by applying skills by applying skills by applying skills by applying
and non-violent positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
discipline to ensure violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
learning- focused to ensure to ensure to ensure to ensure
environments. learning- focused learning- focused learning- focused learning- focused
environments. as environments. as environments. as environments. as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Efficiency Applied atleast 7 Applied atleast 7 Applied atleast 7 Applied atleast 7 No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 8. Review with June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable 3 3 3
Education colleagues, teacher to March collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
Services and learner 2019 reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of shown
feedback to plan, teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
facilitate and enrich feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
teaching practice. evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 9. Advised and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 4 4 4
Education guided colleagues in to March advised advised advised colleagues in the evidence was
Services the selection, 2019 colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the selection, shown
organization, selection, selection, selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development and
use of appropriate development and development and development and appropriate use
teaching and appropriate use appropriate use appropriate use of teaching and
learning resources, of teaching and of teaching and of teaching and learning
including ICT, to learning learning learning resources as
address specific resources as resources as resources as shown in the
learning goals. shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Worked June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 3 3 3
Education and Reporting collaboratively with to March reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
Services colleagues to review 2019 collaboratively collaboratively collaborativel y assessment tools shown
the design, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues
selection, with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues as shown in the
organization and as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
use of a range of MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
effective diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
strategies consistent least 4 assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool evidence was
with curriculum assessment tools as evidently as evidently as evidently shown
requirements. as evidently shown in any of shown in any of shown in any of
shown in any of the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable
the acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 11. Interpreted June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4
Education collaboratively to March collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the shown
evaluation strategies interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
of attainment data to assessment data assessment data assessment data assessment data
support learner as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
progress and
achievement.
Score
0.3
Score
Score
0.3
Score
0.3
Score
0.3
Score
0.3
Score
Score
0.225
Score
Score
0.3
Score
0.225
Score
0.3
Score
0.225
Score
0.3
Score
0.225
Score
0.5
3.8
SATISFACTORY
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Your School Here
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV
2. Collaborated with
colleagues in the conduct
and application of research
2. Collaborated with 3. Certified completed collaborative research
colleagues in the conduct focused on enriching knowledge of content and
and application of research pedagogy
to enrich knowledge of
content and pedagogy.
4. Proof of dissemination of research findings
with colleagues
1. Providing motivation
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof of
communication using other modalities (e.g.
email, SMS, etc.) and corresponding evidence
of improvement
7. Certificate of Training
13. Performed various
related works/activities
that contribute to the 8. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning
process.
9. Committee involvement
12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
ATION TEMPLATE
Description of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Salaman Central Elementary
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat
Feedback:
RATEE
blic of the Philippines
artment of Education
Region XII
ion of Sultan Kudarat
ral Elementary School
n I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat
RATEE
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Central Elementary School
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat