INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: JOSEPH C. INOCENCIO Name of Rater: CHARITO B. MANUMBAS

Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BULACAN Date of Review: NOVEMBER 9, 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied June 2018 - Quality
Services Knowledge and knowledge of March 2019
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
7.5% MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range June 2018 - Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using
Services of teaching March 2019 different teaching different teaching different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range June 2018 - Quality Used different Used different Used different
Services Knowledge and of teaching March 2019 teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 - Quality
Services Environment classroom March 2019 Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
management management management
and Diversity of structure to
strategies that strategies that strategies that
Learners engage learners,
engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
groups, in
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meanigful
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed June 2018 - Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
Services learner behavior March 2019 management management management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4

of the given of the given of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2
4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used June 2018 - Quality Applied Applied
Applied
Services Environment differentiated, March 2019 differentiated differentiated
differentiated
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies teaching strategies
teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner to address learner
to address learner
learning diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 - Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and March 2019 implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in June 2018 - Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Planning collegial March 2019 participated in participated in participated in
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, June 2018 - Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services developed, March 2019 used varied used varied used varied
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5
goals.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied
7.5%
varied teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June 2018 - Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
Services and Reporting selected, March 2019 organized and used organized and used organized and used
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied

varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and June 2018 - Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services evaluated learner March 2019 monitored and monitored and monitored and
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner
achievement progress and progress and progress and
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters
 Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica June 2018 - Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally
Services and Reporting ted promptly and March 2019 showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and
clearly the clear communication of clear
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs,
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a

combination of at
least 4 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV
were distributed
across 4 quarters
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 - Quality Consistently
Services various related March 2019 performed various
works/activities related
that contribute to work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning
process as shown
10% in the MOV
submitted
combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
the acceptable the acceptable
MOV MOV
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed
across 3 quarters across 2 quarters
Frequently Occasionally
performed various performed various
related related
work/activities that work/activities that
contribute to the contribute to the
teaching learning teaching learning
process as shown process as shown
in the MOV in the MOV
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory JOSEPH C. INOCENCIO CHARITO B
Teacher III School
below 1.499 Poor Ratee R
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
CHARITO B. MANUMBAS
PRINCIPAL I
NOVEMBER 9, 2018

ING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable 4 COT rating sheets about 5 5 5.000 0.375
knowledge of content
evidence was
within and across subject
Showed knowledge shown areas with an average
of content and its RPMS rating of 5
integration within
and across subject
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4
Submitted any 1 of No acceptable 4 DLLs and instructional
materials developed
the given MOV evidence was highlighting integration of
shown content knowledge within and
across subject areas

Facilitated using No acceptable 4 COT rating sheets about 5 5 5.000 0.375

teaching strategies that
different teaching evidence was enhance learner
strategies that shown achievement in literacy
promote reading and numeracy skills with
writing and/or an average RPMS rating
of 5
numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable 4 DLLs and instructional

materials used in teaching
learner-centered evidence was highlighting learner-
lessons as shown centered strategies that
evidently shown in promote literacy and/or
any of the other numeracy skills
given MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Used different No acceptable 4 COT rating sheets about 5 5 5.000 0.375
teaching strategies to
teaching strategies evidence was develop critical and creative
that develop critical shown thinking, as well as other
and creative higher-order thinking skills
with an average RPMS
thinking skills rating of 5
and/or other HOTS
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable 4 DLLs and instructional

materials used in teaching
as evidenced by evidence was highlighting learner-centered
any of the other shown strategies that develop critical
and creative thinking, and/or
given MOV other HOTS

No acceptable 4 COT rating sheets about 5 5 5.000 0.375

Used classroom evidence was
managing classroom
management structure that engages
shown learners in various activities
strategies that with an average RPMS
engage learners in rating of 5
activities/tasks as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
4 DLLs highlighting various
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable classroom management
supported by any of evidence was strategies that engage learners
in activities/tasks in different
the acceptable shown physical learning environments
MOV

Applied teacher No acceptable 4 COT rating sheets about 5 5 5.000 0.375

teacher management of
management evidence was learner behavior with an
strategies of learner shown average RPMS rating of 5
behavior that
promote positive
and non-violent
discipline as shown
in MOV submitted
with a rating of 4

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 4 of the given

strategies as observed in
the given strategies evidence was the 4 lessons
as observed in only shown
1 lesson
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Applied No acceptable COT rating sheets about 5 5 5.000 0.375
using differentiated,
differentiated evidence was developmentally appropriate
teaching strategies shown learning experiences with an
to address learner average RPMS rating of 5
diversity as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Submitted any 1 No acceptable 4 DLLs and instructional

materials developed
differentiated evidence was highlighting differentiation in
teaching strategy in shown content, product, process,
learning environment or others
only 1 lesson as according to learners' gender,
evidently shown in needs, strengths, interests
and experiences
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

Planned and No acceptable 4 COT rating sheets about 5 5 5.000 0.375

using developmentally
implemented evidence was sequenced teaching and
developmentally shown learning process with an
sequenced average RPMS rating of 5
teaching and
learning process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable 4 DLLs and instructional

materials developed
developmentally evidence was highlighting
sequenced shown developmetally sequenced
teaching and instruction that meet
learning process as curriculum goals and
varied teaching contexts
evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely participated No acceptable 7 personal notes on 5 5 5.000 0.375
in LAC/FGD/ evidence was LACs with proof of
meeting to discuss shown attendance
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated in 7

LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was LACs
as evidently shown shown
in any 1 of the
given MOV

Developed and No acceptable 4 COT rating sheets 5 5 5.000 0.375

used varied evidence was about using
teaching and shown diagnostic, formative
learning resources, and summative
including ICT, to assessment
address learning startegies with an
goals as shown in average RPMS
MOV 1 with a rating rating of 5
of 4

Submitted any No acceptable 4 DLLs with

teaching and evidence was apprropriate
learning resource, shown instructional
including ICT, as materials appended
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Designed, selected, No acceptable 4 COT rating sheets 5 5 5 0.375
organized and used evidence was about using
diagnostic, shown diagnostic, formative
formative and and summative
summative assessment
assessment strategies with an
strategies average RPMS
consistent with rating of 5
curriculum
requirements as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

4 varied assessment tools : Formative

Submitted 1 No acceptable Assessment in DLL, Diagnostic Tests and

assessment tool as evidence was Summative Tests with TOS reviewed by

principal and with sample accomplishes

evidently shown in shown answer sheets, and Performace Tasks with

Rubrics reviewed by the principal and with

any of the sample accomplished rubrics.

acceptable MOV

4 quarters compilation of learner's

Rarely monitored No acceptable written work with summary of results 5 5 5 5.000 0.375
and evaluated evidence was and with signature of
parents,summative assessment tools
learner progress shown with TOS and frequency of errors with
identified least mastered skills, Class
and achievement records/grading sheets and DLLs
showing index of mastery
using learner
attainment data as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted a combination

of 4 of the acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was MOV
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV were

distributed across 4
was completed in evidence was quarters
only 1 quarter shown
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely showed No acceptable 3 samples of corrected 5 2 5 4 0.300
test papers of the same 3
prompt and clear evidence was learners in the same
communication of shown learning area with parents'
the learners’ needs, or guardians' signature
progress and and date of receipt across
4 quarters
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 1 of the given

MOV
the given MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV were

distributed across 4
was completed in evidence was quarters
only 1 quarter shown
Rarely performed No acceptable 5 various related 5 5 5.000 0.500
work/activities performed
various related evidence was
that contribute to the
work/activities that shown teaching learning process
contribute to the across 4 quarters
teaching learning
process as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted a 5 different

kinds of acceptable MOV
the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

Outstanding 4.925
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

CHARITO B. MANUMBAS MINA GRACIA L. ACOSTA, CESE

School Principal I OIC-Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: JOSEPH C. INOCENCIO

Position: TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BULACAN
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 5
Objective 3 7.5% 5
Objective 4 7.5% 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5
Objective 6 7.5% 5
Objective 7 7.5% 5
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5
Objective 9 7.5% 5
Objective 10 7.5% 5
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5
Objective 12 7.5% 5
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5

JOSEPH C. INOCENCIO CHARITO B. MANUMBAS

Teacher III School Principal I
Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ient Teacher)

Name of Rater: CHARITO B. MANUMBAS

Position: PRINCIPAL I
Date of Review: NOVEMBER 9, 2018

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5 5.000 0.375
2 5 4.000 0.300
5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating Outstanding
Adjectival Rating 4.925

ARITO B. MANUMBAS MINA GRACIA L. ACOSTA, CESE

School Principal I OIC-Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Approving Authority
 PART II: COMPETENCI
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development.
2 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into account personal goals and
values congruent to that of the organization.

3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
5
4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.

Professionalism and Ethics

1 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and
employee (RA 6713).

2 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her actions and decisions.

3 Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, good grooming and
communication. 5
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, improves systems and help others
improve their effectiveness.

Result Focus
1 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2 Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational needs before personal
needs.

3 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures correctly and consistently.
Able to produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no
supervision required.

4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise
ways of meeting goals set. 5
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples may include doing
something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, costumer satisfaction, morale, without
setting any specific goal.

5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
ART II: COMPETENCIES

Teamwork
1 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.

2 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the organization.

3 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.

4
4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.

5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish organizational goals and
objectives.

Service Orientation
1 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2 Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer service issues and concerns.

3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
5
4 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions.

5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will further enhance service
delivery.

Innovation
1 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests
bettter ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).

2 Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on improving personal productivity to create
higher value and results.

3 Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and organization.
5
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with
minimal resources.

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS 4.83

 PART IV

STRENGTHS DEVELOPMENT NEEDS

A. Functional Competencies
Objective 1, KRA 1 Objective 12, KRA 4
To apply knowledge of content within and across To communica te promptly and clearly the
curriculum teaching areas. learners’ needs, progress and achievement to
Objective 5, KRA 2 key stakeholders, including parents/
To manage learner behavior constructively by guardians.
applying positive and non-violent discipline to
ensure learning-focused environment
Objective 13, KRA 5
To perform various related works/activities that
contribute to the teaching-learning process.

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Self-Management Teamwork particularly on working
Professionalism and Ethics constructively and collaboratively with others
Result Focus and across organizations to accomplish
Service Orientation organizational goals and objectives.
Innovation

Feedback:
JOSEPH C. INOCENCIO
Teacher III
Ratee
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
ACTION PLAN
(Recommended Developmetal Intervention) TIMELINE
LEARNING INTERVENTION
OBJECTIVES

Improve current practices regarding Requesting a LAC Session about communica May 2019
commincating learner's needs, progress and ting promptly and clearly the learners’ needs,
achievement to key stakeholders specifically progress and achievement to key stakeholders,
with parents/ guardians. including parents/ guardians.

Attending in a LAC Session about communica

ting promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, June 2019
progress and achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ guardians.

Coaching and mentoring.

Year-round

Work with others in accomplishing Learning how to work with others instead of Year-round
organizational goals and objectives. doing school reports alone through coaching.
CHARITO B. MANUMBAS MINA G
School Principal I OIC-Asst. Sch
Rater
 RESOURCES
TIMELINE NEEDED

May 2019 PPST RESOURCE PACKAGE : MODULE 12

School Head

Local Funds
June 2019

Year-round

Year-round School Head

Local Funds
 MINA GRACIA L. ACOSTA, CESE
OIC-Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority
ERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: JOSEPH C. INOCENCIO JOSEPH C. INOCENCIO
Position: TEACHER III TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BULACAN BULACAN
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019 May 2018 to April 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

MFOs KRAs Objectives Objectives

Basic Education 1. Content Objective 1, KRA 1 Objective 1, KRA 1

Services Knowledge and To apply knowledge of content within To apply knowledge of content within
Pedagogy and across curriculum teaching areas. and across curriculum teaching areas.
Objective 5, KRA 2
To manage learner behavior
constructively by applying positive and
non-violent discipline to ensure
learning-focused environment
Objective 13, KRA 5
To perform various related
works/activities that contribute to the
teaching-learning process.

Basic Education Objective 2, KRA 1

Services To use a range of teaching strategies
that enhance learner schievement in
literacy and numeracy skills
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Objectives

Basic Education 1. Content Objective 3, KRA 1

Services Knowledge and To apply a range of teaching strategies
Pedagogy to develop critical and creative thinking,
as well as other higher order thinking
skills.

Basic Education 2. Learning Objective 4, KRA 2

Services Environment To manage classroom structure to
and Diversity of engage learners, individually or in
Learners groups, in meanigful exploration,
discovery and hands-on activities within
a range of physical learning
environments.

Basic Education Objective 5, KRA 2

Services To manage learner behavior
constructively by applying positive and
non-violent discipline to ensure
learning-focused environment
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Objectives

Basic Education 2. Learning Objective 6, KRA 2 Objective 6, KRA 2

Services Environment To use differentiated, developmentally To use differentiated, developmentally
and Diversity of appropriate learning experiences to appropriate learning experiences to
Learners address learners’ gender, needs, address learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and experiences. strengths, interests and experiences.

Basic Education 3. Curriculum Objective 7, KRA 3 Objective 7, KRA 3

Services and Planning To plan, manage and implement
developmentally sequenced teaching
and learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and varied
teaching contexts.
To plan, manage and implement
developmentally sequenced teaching
and learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and varied
teaching contexts.

MFOs KRAs Objectives Objectives

Basic Education 3. Curriculum Objective 8, KRA 3 Objective 8, KRA 3

Services and Planning To participate in collegial discussions To participate in collegial discussions
that use teacher and learner feedback that use teacher and learner feedback
to enrich teaching practice. to enrich teaching practice.
 to enrich teaching practice. to enrich teaching practice.

Basic Education Objective 9, KRA 3 Objective 9, KRA 3

Services To select, develop, organize and use To select, develop, organize and use
appropriate teaching and learning appropriate teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to address resources, including ICT, to address
learning goals. learning goals.

MFOs KRAs Objectives Objectives

Basic Education 4. Assessment Objjective 10, KRA 4 Objjective 10, KRA 4

Services and Reporting To design, select, organize and use To design, select, organize and use
diagnostic, formative and summative diagnostic, formative and summative
assessment strategies consistent with assessment strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements. curriculum requirements.
Basic Education Objective 11, KRA 4 Objective 11, KRA 4
Services To monitor and evaluate learner To monitor and evaluate learner
progress and achievement using learner progress and achievement using learner
attainment data. attainment data.

MFOs KRAs Objectives Objectives

Basic Education 4. Assessment Objective 12, KRA 4 Objective 12, KRA 4

Services and Reporting To communicate promptly and clearly To communicate promptly and clearly
the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ guardians. including parents/ guardians.

Basic Education 5. Plus Factor Objective 13, KRA 5

Services To perform various related
works/activities that contribute to the
teaching-learning process.
 ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor Poor