TABLE.

1 Test for normality of data

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
CFP .340 70 .000 .637 70 .000
Age .290 70 .000 .809 70 .000
Status .340 70 .000 .637 70 .000
Gender .399 70 .000 .617 70 .000

Table 1 shows the normality of the data. It shows the significant value of CFP, age, status,
and gender is .000, therefore, I conclude that the data provided is not normally distributed.

Table CFP:

A B C D E F
Chi-Square .671 .149 2.869 2.827 2.551 .995
Df 1 1 1 1 1 1
Asymp. Sig. .413 .699 .090 .093 .110 .318

Table 2 shows the difference between the perception of the respondents in the effectiveness of two
Child Friendly Programs in minimizing problems among children and youth in terms of CFP. It
shows that all of the perceptions of the respondents has no difference in their perception (p-
value>.05), therefore, failed to reject null hypothesis

Table Age:

A B C D E F
Chi-Square 2.309 7.850 4.656 6.607 4.963 5.943
Df 6 6 6 6 6 6
Asymp. Sig. .889 .249 .589 .359 .549 .430
Table 3: The age of the respondent has no significant difference in perception in effectiveness of
two child friendly programs in minimizing problems among children and youth. Because as we
can see all if their Pvalue is > 0.05 so reject the HO: there is no significant difference.

Table Gender:

A B C D E F
Chi-Square .004 .470 2.339 .373 5.257 .726
Df 1 1 1 1 1 1
Asymp. Sig. .948 .493 .126 .541 .022 .394

Table 2: shows the difference between the perception of the respondents in the effectiveness of
two Child Friendly Programs in minimizing problems among children and youth in terms of their
gender. It shows that the column A (Home Life Services), B (Spiritual Recreational Services), C
(Educational Program), D (Health and Nutrition Services), and F (Livelihood and Skills Training
Program ) has no difference in their perception (p-value>.05), while column E (Psychological
and Social Services) has a significant difference (p-value<.05). it means that the psychological
and social services has an influence in the effectiveness of two child friendly program in
minimizing problems among children and youth.

Table Status:

Test Statisticsa,b
A B C D E F
Chi-Square .718 .062 .614 .001 .002 .064
df 1 1 1 1 1 1
Asymp. Sig. .397 .803 .433 .975 .961 .801

Table 3: effectiveness of the program according to their status ( patient and stuff) has no
difference between perception and respondents in effectiveness of two child friendly programs in
minimizing problems among children and youth. Because as we can see all if their Pvalue is >
0.05 so reject the HO: there is no significant difference.