Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Condition Indices
Carlos M. Chang, Ph.D., P.E.
Office:A-205
Phone: 915-747-8301
e-mail: cchangalbitres2@utep.edu
Indices
Subjective ratings that reflect the attitude of
the rater/developer about some observable
attribute
Types of Indices
Function of Types of Condition Measures &
Indicators
Maintenance Needs
Functional Adequacy
Safety
Structural/Engineering Adequacy
Sub-portions of above
Combinations of above
3
1
Types of Indices
Individual damage type index
Cracking index
Skid index
Combined type index
Pavement distress index
Bridge safety index
Overall Combined index
Sewer index
Pavement quality index 4
Usage Levels
Individual Index
Used at any level
Combination Indices
Primarily network or higher level
2
Index
Quantified scale
Communication tool
Too Fine
Smaller than rates discrimination
So smooth that
no improvement
would produce
noticeable results
So rough that
continuing would
risk damage to
vehicle or injury to 9
occupants
3
PSI Rating
10 Superior
9 Excellent
8
Very Good
7
Good
6
OK
5
Fair
4 Almost Fair
3 Poor
2 Very Poor
1
Failed
0
10
CI Rating
100
Excellent
85
Very Good
70
Good
55
Fair
40
Poor
25
Very Poor
10
Failed 11
0
Example Indices
PSI - Functional
PCI - Engineering
12
4
PRESENT SERVICEABILITY
INDEX (PSI)
Developed at AASHO Road Test
14
15
5
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI)
Developed by U. S. Army and Air Force
Panel of pavement maintenance engineers rated
pavements giving the present condition rating
(PCR)
Regression analysis used to develop relation
between PCR and observed distress
Found nonlinearity in deducts for multiple
occurrences
16
Deduct Curves
Reduction of PCI value if only one distress
type-severity combination present
18
6
For One Distress Type-Severity Combination
Quantity 19
100 q =1 2 3 4
Corrected CDV
Deduct
Value q = Number of entries with
TDV deduct value over 5 points
0
0 100 200
Total Deduct Value
Step 5. Compute Pavement Condition Index,
PCI=100-CDV, for each sample unit inspected. 20
Step 6. Determine Pavement Condition Rating.
Alligator Cracking
100
80 H
De duct V alue
M
60 L
40
20
0
0.1 1 10 100
Distress Density - Percent
21
7
Block Cracking
100
80
De duct V alue
H
60
40 M
L
20
0
0.1 1 10 100
Distress Density - Percent
22
Deduct Values
Not additive
23
24
8
Developing Indices:
Postulate Your Model
What are you trying to measure
25
26
Benefits of Indices
Combine much information into a single
number
Facilitates direct comparisons
Among sections
Over time
Permits mathematical manipulations
Projected condition
Masks minor differences
27
9
Conclusions
Indices are useful tools
Primarily at network and higher levels
Reflect the view of the developing group
28
10