Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
That conformably with section 3 (b) of the said A.M. No. 12-8-8-
SC, I also state that it was ATTY. NATHANIEL CLARUS who conducted
the examination of the undersigned affiant at Room 508 5th floor Sugbutel
building North Reclamation Area, Cebu City;
That, I hereby state under the pain of perjury that in answering the
questions asked of me, as appearing herein below, I am fully conscious
that I did so under oath, and that I may face criminal liabilities for false
testimony or perjury;
Q1.) Who are you and why have you come here?
A1.) I am RANDY V. MIASCO and I am here to ask for
assistance in filing a criminal case against RINO P. NAVAJA, of
legal age, Filipino citizen, and is a resident of Upper Laguerta,
Lahug Cebu City;
Q6.) Could you describe how bad the impact was to both the
multicab and the minibus?
A6.) Yes. The impact was so bad the right side of the body of
the multicab was crumpled and wrecked. On the other hand, the
minibus ended up with a dented bumper; photographs of the
damage mentioned are respectfully attached as Annex “D”;
Q7.) What do you think could be the reason why the incident
happened?
A7.) The incident happened in broad daylight, and it surely was
not raining that day to make the road slippery. Therefore, it
cannot be said that part of the incident was attributable to
external factors other than the manner of driving between me
and the driver of the minibus. Also, I am certain that the incident
is not imputable to me as the driver of the multicab, as I was
driving at a low speed cautious and conscious of the traffic rules
and signs in that area. However, I cannot say the same for
RINO P. NAVAJA. He was driving really fast and very
recklessly. It must be emphasized that RINO P. NAVAJA is
employed as a driver for ELSA A. LIM’S transportation
business. He is therefore well aware and conscious of the traffic
rules and regulations and is expected to be proficient in driving.
Considering this fact, his actions and judgments while driving
that time should be considered voluntary and made in full
consciousness; yet he chose to maneuver the vehicle recklessly
and very negligently;
Q8.) What steps did you take at that time in order to apprehend
and hold the person driving the Isuzu Minibus answerable to the
damage caused?
A8.) The incident was reported to the police who thereafter
issued a Report stating that RINO P. NAVAJA was at fault as he
was maneuvering the said vehicle in a very fast speed in clear
disregard of the Traffic Rules and Regulations, a copy of the
Police Report is attached in this Affidavit as Annex “E”;
Q9.) What injuries have the three of you suffered due to the
incident?
A9.) I and my father PEDRO A. MIASCO suffered multiple
injuries and were later condined at the University of Cebu
Medical Center to which a copy of the Certificate of
Confinement are respectfully attached as Annex “F” and “F-1”.
However, my brother RENIMAR V. MIASCO was confined in
the said hospital but later died on August 27, 2018. A copy of
RENIMAR V. MIASCO’S Certificate of Confinement and his
Certificate of Death are respectfully attached as Annex “G” and
“G-1”;
Q11): Will you confirm and affirm the truthfulness and veracity
of your testimony?
A11): Yes, I do;
---------END OF STATEMENT—————
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand below this 19th day
of February 2019 at Cebu City, Philippines.
RANDY V. MIASCO
Affiant
ATTESTATION
NATHANIEL N. CLARUS
Affiant
ROLL NO., 38708