Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jared Agyemang
6368716
PSYC 4P71
Brock University
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 2
Abstract
Prejudice and discrimination explore the changes in attitude and treatment a person may show
another person or group of people in an opposing race. There are many reasons that can explain
or hint to why people might be racist. In the psychology of prejudice and discrimination, many
theories are explored including: Social Identity Theory (SIT), Conflict Theory, Group Relative
Deprivation Theory, Terror Management Theory (TMT), Social Role Theory, and
Developmental Intergroup Theory. These theories talk about how we as people shape the world
around us and ourselves, whether as children or adults. And they also talk about how we as
people are protective of our identities, beliefs, and resources that we have shaped our world with.
Although there are some conflicts, most of these theories tie very well together when attempting
to explain the motives behind racism. But overall, further research can always be done because
the education can eventually teach people why they may have racist thoughts or feelings, but
ultimately can teach people how to reduce it. Because “me” or “us” vs. “them” is a concept we
don’t need to develop just because someone is of a different race than ourselves.
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 3
Introduction
Prejudice is an attitude directed toward people because they are members of a specific
social group (Kite and Whitley Jr, 2016). Similarly, discrimination is treating a person differently
from others based solely or primarily on the person’s membership in a social group (2016).
Psychology research looks at prejudice and discrimination together in order to discover the
nature of the two, while analyzing the “why” and “how” these topics play a role in society and in
the different or various types of people’s lives. Also, after understanding the essence of prejudice
and discrimination, psychology—if possible—aims to reduce and even prevent prejudice and
discrimination in the areas it effects. Although there are many things that prejudice and
discrimination can affect including: religion, age, class, or sex, a big category it has a major
impact on is race. The negative affect prejudice and discrimination has on race, results in racism.
And racism is a form of prejudice and discrimination, that involves negative actions, words,
thoughts and feelings directed towards ssomeone of a different race, based on the belief that
one's own race is superior (or the idea that certain races are inferior or superior to another race or
races). With there being so many theories in the psychology of prejudice and discrimination, the
possibility of some standing out as explanations as to why someone or a group of people might
be racist to another person or group of people is really high. The goal of this paper is to discuss
some of these theories of prejudice and discrimination, explore how they might explain the
nature of racism, and to critically analyze their strengths, weaknesses, and how they can be used
or tested by researchers.
Social Identity Theory (SIT), explains prejudice by viewing the link between people’s
self-concepts and their membership in the different groups they see as important to them (2016).
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 4
Due to the fact that people see these groups as an extension of themselves, they try to ensure the
status of these groups by favoring ingroup members over outgroup members in various situations
(2016). This could be a main indicator of racism because these types of feelings not only create
bias, but a competitive nature that allows one to think it is “me/us” vs. “them”. And in that
mindset, one may directly or indirectly favour their own race, over an outgroup race, wanting to
White viewers’ judgments, researchers wanted to examine the relationship between aversive
racism and social identity theory (Mastro, Behm-Morawitz and Kopacz, 2008). The researchers
predicted that after viewing the depictions, greater in-group identification would occur as well as
the fact that higher self-esteem would be reported for those exposed to the outgroup, opposite of
those exposed to the ingroup (2008). And although it is not to be overstated, the researchers
found just that. Viewers’ racially driven responses emerged largely during the television
depictions, and they identified more with the in-group and also enhanced their self-esteem
(2008).
The Social Identity theory can be a strong explanation for the cause of racism because of
categorization. Due to the fact that people find it necessary to group people, objects, and events
together to process what they see and know, it is almost an innate to group oneself into a
category distinct of other groups of people and possibly races. However, a weakness of this
theory is that associating as a part of a group doesn’t automatically make it superior or inferior to
another, that is a mental process that people add on their own. And grouping people into
categories does not always have to be in the broad category of race, because different races can
be in the same category but for something more specific (i.e., a student). So Social Identity
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 5
Theory can affect the views on race, but certainly could not be reason of prejudice and
Relative deprivation theory is a concept that stems from people’s perceived unfair
treatment. This is because they feel deprived relative to what they had in the past or relative to
people who have the resource they believe they deserve (2016). So when looking at it in terms of
race, if people blame a group for their unfair treatment (group relative deprivation theory), they
develop negative feelings toward members of that group (2016). In a 1972 study conducted by
Reeve Vanneman and Thomas Pettigrew, data was collected to observe economic gains of White
people to compare and see if they felt like their gains were less than other White people
(personally deprived) and if it felt less than Black people (group deprivation) as well (2016).
Bannerman and Pettigrew found a modest relationship between group relative deprivation and
prejudice with 54% of the White people high in group relative deprivation expressing negative
attitudes toward Black people, and 42% of Whites who were low in group relative deprivation.
And although the White respondents in these surveys were objectively better off than the Black
people, 42% of them still considered themselves “losing out” to the Black people, and it was they
Group relative deprivation theory is a good possible explanation for racism because
hostility can arise towards another group due to the fact that a member or members of the
opposing group feels like they deserve better. Even if they don’t “deserve” it, status is an
important part of people’s identities, so not wanting to be a part of the weaker, lesser, or lower
group could fuel these type of feelings—eventually leading to racism. Also, feelings of being
more highly benefited than other groups can also cause prejudice. So rather than feeling angry
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 6
because the other group has deprived them of something, people derogate or devalue the other
group to justify them being better off (2016). However, a weakness of this theory is the sense of
because the perspective of being treated “unfair”. Ironically, the unfair treatment is most likely to
affect the opposing group, who is probably not to blame for anybody’s deprivation.
Realistic or Group Conflict Theory states that people come to dislike members of other
groups because they see those opposing groups as competition with their own group for needed
resources (2016). People want to maximize their rewards or want them and their own group to be
superior when it comes to life in general, so anybody who is not a part of their group has an
equal chance of being discriminated or getting a prejudiced response from them. In the text,
examples of this were stated to be seen when it came to wars or even colonization. One of
Germany’s reasons for starting World War II was to increase the living space for Germany’s
increasing population (2016). And then in the Americas, European settlers continually pushed
back Native American populations to acquire access to farmland, minerals, and other natural
resources (2016).
because it explains why a group of people may feel the need to compete against another,
especially in a society. It is probably a theory with more historic value, because in modern times
there is a more equal opportunity when it comes to resources. At the same time that is the
theories weakness—the conflicts are not necessarily group vs. group anymore, and whether or
not there is “scarcity” of resources it does not necessarily spark a racial feud between two
groups. It may just only affect an individual personally, who may blame a certain group for
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 7
exploiting that resource (i.e., blaming a certain group of immigrants for coming into the country
Terror Management Theory (TMT) is the proposition that people’s desire to promote and
defend their belief and value systems results in prejudice (2016). Also, as one’s awareness of
mortality increases, their adherence to the ingroup’s cultural values increase as well. And then
they may express prejudice against groups they see as challenging those views as a way of
deflecting (their eventual death) (2016). In a study using Terror Management Theory to
understand interpretations of race related events between Whites and Blacks, researchers found
that the theory suggests that by virtue of Blacks’ and Whites’ diverse experiences (personal,
vicarious, and historical), they may construct meaning of the world differently and, therefore,
embrace different beliefs and interpretations in response to the same event (Parker et al. 2015).
This similarity can be seen for almost every even that either sparked or contributed to the “Black
Lives Matter movement in America. The tragic shooting of a young black male is interpreted
differently by everyone, even if they both see it as wrong. For White’s it is something that should
not happen to anyone, which is most likely why they retorted back with the phrase “all lives
matter”, whereas Blacks felt like it was more targeted and about race, in which people were
dying simply because of their skin color. Throughout these incidents, Blacks tended to keep their
views, not only for justice, but also fear that it could happen to them our anyone else they knew
in their ingroup. Although it was not a main topic of the movements, there was a racial divide in
which either of the parties felt prejudice or discriminated against, due to the hostility and debates
Terror Management theory is a possibly a good explanation for racism because it points
out the deep, psychologically protective mentality that people have for their own beliefs and
values. How one sees the world enables them to imbue their worlds with value, meaning, and
structure (2015). Alternative worldviews from one’s own view can also be threatening, because
they suggest the possibility that a person’s own worldview may not be absolutely correct, which
could undermine one’s confidence in his/her own conceptualization of the world (2015). With
alternative views being such a big threat to a person, it is enough to cause dislike or hate out of
fear and the need to protect one’s beliefs. However, a weakness to this theory explaining racism
is the fact that threatening someone’s beliefs or view leads more to the dislike of religion, rather
than the race of the person itself. Recalling the “Black lives matter” example, the essence of the
issue was fighting for Black people’s right to life, safety, and justice—which everyone has a
right to so naturally it shouldn’t be opposed. But usually, the only time someone’s personal
views get opposed is when it is a matter of religion, and if it is an opposing worldview (like
homophobia for example), it is more of an isolated incident with another person and not their
Social Role Theory is the proposition that, when we observe others, we pay attention to
the social roles they occupy and in turn come to associate the characteristics of the role with
these same individuals (2016). Although this theory is typically used to point out the prejudice
and discrimination towards genders and the stereotypes that go along with them, it can also be
used to explain one’s racist views. This is because people develop illusory correlations, which is,
incorrectly linking two characteristics, like race and personality, to identify a person (2016).
Jefferey Sherman, a researcher and his colleagues, found that stereotypes of social groups can be
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 9
formed in the absence of any real group differences and the process by which this happens can
explain why minority-group members are viewed more negatively than majority-group members
(2016). So, for example, negative stereotypes like “Latinos are dirty”, or “Black people are lazy”
are stereotypical perceptions that other groups develop over time because of what was once
perceived before. For what may have started as something to describe an individual, it has
transformed into a definition to describe a whole group of people. Usually these stereotypes are
assumptions, but overall, these negative stereotypes in turn can cause a person to be
The Social Role Theory is a decent indicator for the explanation because people can sometimes
mentally fit or associate certain races of people into specific roles in society, based on their
characteristics or stereotypes. Whether its traits or behaviours, there are some stereotypes fit
better or define certain groups over others. However, a weakness of the theory is that it heavily
relies on stereotypes, and there aren’t as many “roles” that define different race groups, as there
are when it comes to roles about gender, age, or occupations etc. Also, social roles aren’t always
negative, and although they do tend to form stereotypes, there are some that are positive or not as
Developmental Intergroup Theory is a theory that is focuses on children. It states that the
children simply try to understand the world they live in and the rules by which that world
operates (2016). Similar to social identity theory, the process of categorization takes place when
children look at races of others and even when looking at themselves. This can cause ingroup
favoritism, which is also found in adults, where children tend to attribute positive traits to their
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 10
own groups (2016). And rarely, children can be explicitly taught prejudice, similar to social
learning theory (2016). In a study looking at the intergroup bias in childhood, it was found that
children favour ingroup members and it doesn’t decline with age (Monteiro, de França and
Rodrigues, 2009). Also, researchers found that a significant percentage of children tried to justify
their bias in terms of disliking the out-group member or the out-group as a whole. And their
justifications supported the idea that the focus of children’s racial attitudes (in-group vs out-
group) is probably more “status and context related” than development-dependent (2009).
Despite this, the fact that prejudice in children can be fueled by the mental process of something
like status alone is a bit alarming. But at the same time, it makes sense as to why it is a fair
explanation for eventual racism because ingroup bias and favouritism start early. However, a
weakness in this theory as an explanation for racism is the implication that prejudice is almost
innate or developed innately. Children aren’t born into prejudice, hate, or discrimination but
mentally categorize their world in a way that they are taught to. So even if they develop
favouritism for their ingroup, any negative feelings towards an outgroup could probably be
indirect.
The biggest conflict between theories is between Developmental Intergroup Theory and
Social Role Theory and the rest of them (TMT, SIT, Conflict Theory, Group Relative
Deprivation Theory). This is because the first two imply that (if they have an effect on racism)
they are things you either learn about and process on your own, whereas the latter imply that who
you are, what you believe, and your entire ingroup is threatened, and prejudice and
discrimination is the defensive response to counteract these threats. In fact, three of the latter
theories (SIT, Conflict Theory, and Relative Deprivation Theory) connect together using the
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 11
concept of threat in a bigger theory known as the “Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice”
(ITTP). Perceptions of realistic threat can derive from intergroup conflict and feelings of group
relative deprivation, and perceptions of symbolic threat can derive from social identity processes
(2016). Overall, the ITTP might deem as the most reasonable explanations for the cause or why
In regard to the theories that are a part of the ITTP, shortcomings that can be addressed
can be the question of why the threats always have to involve the “ingroup” and not just the
individual. Whether it is identity, or beliefs, or even competition for resources, sometimes racism
can be personal experiences or threats involving the outgroup. In regard to Social Role Theory, it
can further explore the roles of different races in society. If not specifically as in jobs, then class
and status of people (actual or perceived) and see if that has an effect on racism. And in regard to
addressed. Perhaps there are some cases where the ingroup isn’t always the same race, or some
cases where children don’t categorize “other” children as the “other”. It is an area to explore that
When looking at testing advantages, more studies can try to view situations where people feel
their identity, beliefs, or resources are threatened. And can also try to view the social roles of
races as well as how children process other children or people not classified in the same group as
them. Although it may be difficult, there’s always more room to explore why prejudice and
discrimination with race is a big problem, and through this research ways to prevent or reduce it
Conclusion
Overall, there are many theories that can possibly stand on its own as a good explanation
for why there is racism or that someone is racist. Although it could be because how we perceive
social roles as adults, or how we favorite our ingroups over outgroups as children, the threat of
our identities, beliefs, and resources are the more reasonable explanations as to why people are
possibly racist. The overall need to protect ourselves as individuals or within the groups that we
belong to is sometimes an internal drive or response we cannot stop. However, it is not an excuse
to negatively treat someone or have a negative attitude towards them just because they are a
different race. Hopefully more research can be done within the psychology of prejudice and
discrimination in order to change people’s perspective and reduce racism, after they get to root of
the problem. Also, hopefully more research can be done to explore even more theories as to why
racism exists, why people are racism, and what can be done by people to prevent it.
ANALYZING THEORIES EFFECT ON RACE 13
References
Kite, M. and Whitley Jr, B. (2016). Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination. 3rd ed. New
York: Routledge.
Latinos: The Implications of Aversive Racism and Social Identity Theory. Human
Monteiro, M., de França, D. and Rodrigues, R. (2009). The development of intergroup bias in
childhood: How social norms can shape children's racial behaviours. International
Parker, A., & Taylor, M. J. (2015). Through a different lens: use of terror management theory to
https://proxy.library.brocku.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=
rue&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.460185802&site=eds-live&scope=site